ParaView 5.0.1 RC2 for Win-64 has been tested with my big EnSight case. I loaded case successfully and created slice and vectors (glyphs) on it, no any issues occured. Great thanks for debugging!
Meanwhile, I noticed that the color bar behavior is not as good as it was in version 4.3. The color bar doesn't adjusts automatically to round numbers (like my boss like to see in my reports :)), although it uses correct fonts (it's known that version 4.3 didn't enlarge color bar fonts in many cases despite of user's choice). But it's not a bug and scale can be adjusted by hand (it's done much more faster than in CFD Post that slowly rebuilds contour on every change on number of ticks, ParaView does it almost instantly). I read some discussions a bit and I suppose that the current behavior of color vr is a "common choice". 2016-03-21 8:34 GMT+03:00 Andrew <antech...@gmail.com>: > > *Utkarsh,* > Thanks for notification. I will try this version as soon as possible. > > 2016-03-21 4:41 GMT+03:00 Utkarsh Ayachit <utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com>: > >> Andrew, >> >> ParaView 5.0.1-RC2 binaries are now available for download. Please >> give them a try and let me know if are still seeing the Ensight issue. >> >> Thanks >> Utkarsh >> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit >> <utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com> wrote: >> > The binaries have not yet been generated. You'll have to use RC2, not >> > RC1 for this fix. >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:52 AM, Andrew <antech...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello. >> >> I recieved an email about corrected ParaView-5.0.1 and decided to test >> the >> >> latest available official release for Win64: >> >> ParaView-5.0.1-RC1-Qt4-OpenGL2-Windows-64bit.zip >> >> I tried the same big EnSight case and the same error appeared (stat >> failed). >> >> Should be this release "patched" or it's not corrected yet and I >> should wait >> >> for another version? >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> 2016-03-09 23:42 GMT+03:00 Utkarsh Ayachit < >> utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com>: >> >>> >> >>> This merge request should address this issue: >> >>> >> >>> https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/merge_requests/1320 >> >>> >> >>> Once it's tested, reviewed etc. it'll be merged and I'll have it >> >>> updated in ParaView release 5.0.1 as well. >> >>> >> >>> Utkarsh >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit >> >>> <utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com> wrote: >> >>> > I didn't but I didn't have to :). Your investigation lead me to in >> the >> >>> > right direction -- it just wasn't FILE_OFFSET_BITS that was the >> issue. >> >>> > It was the fact that on Windows the stat function is different, >> >>> > period. I am hoping to push a fix in for 5.0.1. >> >>> > >> >>> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:32 AM, Andrew <antech...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> Utkarsh Ayachit, >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Hello. Did you try the trick with EnSight geometry file reader? >> Thanks. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> 2016-03-03 17:51 GMT+03:00 Utkarsh Ayachit >> >>> >> <utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com>: >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> > About test file. It's simple, IMHO. Generate any garbage file or >> >>> >>> > take >> >>> >>> > any >> >>> >>> > existing big file. Rename it to have the geometry file name for >> any >> >>> >>> > small >> >>> >>> > EnSight case. Feed this case to ParaView 5.0 under Windows x64 >> (I >> >>> >>> > use >> >>> >>> > Win7). >> >>> >>> > The parsing doesnt start so the file contents doesnt matter. It >> only >> >>> >>> > wants >> >>> >>> > to open file and stops because of stat() error, even ifstream() >> is >> >>> >>> > not >> >>> >>> > engaged. >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Cool! Yea, that's a nitfy little test case :). I'll give it a try. >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Utkarsh >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> >>> >> Powered by www.kitware.com >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at >> >>> >> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: >> >>> >> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Search the list archives at: >> http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: >> >>> >> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Powered by www.kitware.com >> >> >> >> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at >> >> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html >> >> >> >> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: >> >> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView >> >> >> >> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView >> >> >> >> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: >> >> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview >> >> >> > >
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
