I don't know how comfortable I feel with that. I've never liked "scoring" art. It's hard, for instance, to score composition, since no one seems to be able to agree if there are even rules of composition, and even those who say there are such rules admit that sometimes they have to be or can be broken.
I like subjective comments. If anyone making such comments wants to take it upon themselves to use their own scoring system, then so be it. But, if we have scoring for everyone, then we have "winners and losers", and I don't think PUG's about that. If someone wants their photo rated that way, they can submit it to photo.net. My 2 cents, anyway... cheers, frank Kathleen wrote: > I love looking at all of the PUG monthly photos, but I do not feel qualified > to comment on the photos insofar as offering praise, criticism, or > suggestions for improvement. What I think would work, if it would be > possible, is if there were some sort of a rating system (number 1-5, 5 being > the best) for the technical components such as composition that one could > rate each photo as they viewed it. Perhaps there could be 2 or 3 different > technical things, and then there could be a place for people to check if the > photo is one of their top 3 or 5 favorite photos. This would not take long > and could be done while viewing the photos. Probably that would be hard to > set up. The scoring would be something that just PUG members could access, > and the end of each month, the ratings for the top 10 or so could be posted. > Just a thought . . . probably not doable. > > Kathy L. -- "Hell is others" -Jean Paul Sartre
