On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 10:16:16AM +0000, fujii.y...@df.mitsubishielectric.co.jp wrote: > 2. Approach 2 > (1) Advantages > (a) No need to add partial aggregate functions to the catalogs for each > aggregation > (2) Disadvantages > (a) Need to add non-standard keywords to the SQL syntax. > > I did not choose Approach2 because I was not confident that the disadvantage > mentioned in 2.(2)(a) > would be accepted by the PostgreSQL development community. > If it is accepted, I think Approach 2 is smarter. > Could you please provide your opinion on which > approach is preferable after comparing these two approaches?
I didn't know #2 was possible, but given the great number of catalog entries, doing it in the SQL grammar seems cleaner to me. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you.
