--On Wednesday, May 12, 2004 15:39:54 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This is the whole discussion we had back in January/February about
forcing -Kpthread for *ALL* libpq using programs, or dynamically
determining if the image already is linked -Kpthread, or not supporting
threads at all on UW.

Oh, that business :-(. AFAIR we did not much care for any of the proposed alternatives. Have you thought of any new options?

At this point I'd settle for saying that --enable-thread-safety on
Unixware will generate a library that requires -Kpthread.  This is
kinda grungy but it seems that any more-pleasant solution would
require a disproportionate amount of work.
If I did the work for the dlsym() stuff would you and the rest of core@
accept it?



regards, tom lane



-- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature



Reply via email to