RE: Scope of the House of Justice -VERY LONG

2005-02-02 Thread Susan Maneck
In The thirteenth Glad-Tidings and The eighth Ishraq,
Baha'u'llah refers to The MEN of God's House of Justice as the
Trustees of God.

Dear Sandra,

Keep in mind that originally Abdu'l-Baha applied this passage when asked why
women were excluded from the Chicago House of Justice. It was later He
restricted its application to the Universal House of Justice.

In the Aqdas, referencing previous epistles Baha'u'llah
enjoins upon the Trustees of  the House of Justice either to
choose one language from among those now existing or to adopt
a new one ...

I'll grant you that this is likely to be a function of the Universal House
of Justice alone.

In Tablets of Baha'u'llah, while reiterating earlier passages
in the Aqdas and other Tablets;  Baha'u'llah said:  ...all
affairs are committed to the care of just kings and presidents
and of the Trustees of the House of Justice.  As kings and
presidents are equated with the Trustees, it leaves little
doubt in my mind that He intends the *Universal* House of
Justice and not any of the Local Spiritual Assemblies or
future Local Houses of Justice.

But why wouldn't it apply to Secondary Houses of Justice?

And, again from Tablets of Baha'u'llah, He said:  ...the
Trustees are then to take from him that which is required for
their instruction, if he be wealthy, and if not the matter
devolveth upon the House of Justice.  [for the education of
children]  Again, the education of children may well have
roots in the local community - however, this statement speaks
to taxation.

So why wouldn't local Houses of Justice be in charge of taxation?
Abdu'l-Baha seems to place them in charge of the local storehouses.

Also, in Tablets, the Trustees of God's House of Justice are
again paired with the chiefs and rulers of the world...
not likely Baha'u'llah is referring to Local Houses of Justice
there.

Again, there are all kinds of levels of Houses of Justice. And they are all
considered 'rulers in Baha.

In God Passes By, Shoghi Effendi states that in the Aqdas,
Baha'u'llah: ordains the institution of the House of
Justice, defines its functions, fixes its revenues, and
designates its members as the Men of Justice, the Deputies
of God, the Trustees of the All-Merciful ...  And indeed He
does! [page 26

And elsewhere the term 'Trustees of the all-Mericful applied to lesser
institutions as well.

With regard to the Iqan quote:  Ultimately, the Local and
National Assemblies must rely on the Universal House of
Justice  *expound meanings*, and *unravel mystery* and, it's
been established that Baha'u'llah designated ...the men of
God's House of Justice as the Trustees of God.

Sandra, that the function of the Authoritative Interpreters and the
Manifestations not the Universal House of Justice.
I believe in most if not all the quotes I gave, the words
*Trustees* or *House of Justice* or *Universal House of
Justice* are all in combination with a personal pronoun -
making the title or designation - *specific* to one/singular
institution.

Huh? What personal pronouns are you talking about?

  It's been a long time since I've had any formal
education in English.  I'm open to correction if I'm wrong.

 I don't see him adopting a convention of capitalizing
references to the Universal House of Justice. 

Can you provide a sentence from any of the Guardian's writings
or translations where he did NOT capitalize Universal House of
Justice ?  I'm still looking for one...

I said *references* to the Universal House of Justice, not the name
Universal House of Justice which is capitalized by virtue of being a
proper name. But so are Houses of Justice generically.

warmest, Susan


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Scope of the House of Justice -VERY LONG

2005-01-30 Thread Sandra Chamberlain
Susan: Is that what your argument is based on, 
capitalization? Because as far as I know there is not any 
convention whereby Baha'is are supposed to use upper case 
letters to refer to the Universal House of Justice and lower 
case when referring to other institutions. The only difference 
between those passages using caps or not using caps as far as 
I can tell is that the former  are translated by the Guardian 
and the latter are later translations. 

Dear Susan,
Considering that I wasn't stating my opinion and and defining 
my personal logic in an attempt to persuade, I would have to 
say No to your question.  I don't view this as a great 
debate with a winner and loser.  I view this as consultation 
with a view to gaining new insights; and no vested interest in 
anyone accepting or rejecting my opinion.

Actually, whenever, I have a curiosity about a particular 
topic I research for constancy in the writings.  Having done 
that - I'm personally convinced that my initial understanding 
still holds...  (for me at least!)

Would you agree that in the English language words which are 
are capitalized enable the reader to distinguish, in context, 
the significance of the capitalization.  For instance: God or 
god.

I trust the Guardian intended to convey the distinctive nature 
of the title when capitalizing *Trustees*.  He knew the value 
of nuances contained in the English language and utilized the 
language as a tool - I suspect it was an exercise he relished. 
World Order was the first Baha'i book I read and I still find 
it totally amazing as an example of the vast range of the 
English language with regard to clarity.

I do hope Ahang can find time to track the scope of the House 
of Justice through the text.  I think it's an important topic 
to pursue and gain a better understanding of the progression 
of the vision from Baha'u'llah, to Abdu'l-Baha and then the 
Guardian.

Lovingly,  Sandra
__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Scope of the House of Justice -VERY LONG

2005-01-30 Thread Susan Maneck

Considering that I wasn't stating my opinion and and defining
my personal logic in an attempt to persuade, I would have to
say No to your question.
  I don't view this as a great
debate with a winner and loser.

Dear Sandra,

Sorry if I came down too hard in that last post.  I'm using the term
argument in the sense of a fact or assertion offered as evidence that
something is true.

You wrote:

Would you agree that in the English language words which are
are capitalized enable the reader to distinguish, in context,
the significance of the capitalization.  For instance: God or
god.

God is used a proper noun when it is capitalized if that is what you mean.
But I'm not sure what you mean by enabling 'the reader to distinguish, in
context, the significance of the capitalization.'

I trust the Guardian intended to convey the distinctive nature
of the title when capitalizing *Trustees*.

Okay, but as I mentioned the only time he capitalized it was in that passage
from the Iqan which does not refer to the members of any House of Justice,
local or universal. The other passages you cited are not translated by the
Guardian. The other cases are ones where he uses it in caps as a title in
GPB and the World Order letters. I don't see any consistency in where he
uses or doesn't use caps in conection with those texts. In any case, my
point, is that you are ascribing a meaning to those texts which doesn't
follow either from the rules of English grammar or from the Guardian's own
usage. I don't see him adopting a convention of capitalizing references to
the Universal House of Justice.

warmest, Susan


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Scope of the House of Justice -VERY LONG

2005-01-30 Thread howard green

Dr. G. Thanks, the unsubscribe request went through
From: "Richard H. Gravelly" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: "Baha'i Studies" bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
To: "Baha'i Studies" bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Subject: Re: Scope of the House of Justice -VERY LONG
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:58:01 -0800



The compilation is excellent Sandra.Thank you much.

Richard.


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu





RE: Scope of the House of Justice -VERY LONG

2005-01-29 Thread Susan Maneck

I'm in complete agreement with Brent's understanding and I
feel that is supported by numerous references from
Baha'u'llah's Writings where the *Trustees* are a direct
reference the the [Universal] House of Justice.

Dear Sandra,

Some of those passage you cite would refer only to the Universal House of
Justice and some to Houses of Justice in general. I don't think that the
term 'trustee' is any hint as to which He is referring to. All members of
any elected institution are 'Trustees of the Merciful.'

warmest, Susan


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Scope of the House of Justice -VERY LONG

2005-01-29 Thread Sandra Chamberlain
Susan:  Some of those passage you cite would refer only to 
the Universal House of Justice and some to Houses of Justice 
in general. I don't think that the term 'trustee' is any hint 
as to which He is referring to. All members of any elected 
institution are 'Trustees of the Merciful.' 

Dear Susan,
Perhaps the quote below is one you are thinking of:
5. The Lord hath ordained that in every city a House of 
Justice be established wherein shall gather counsellors to the 
number of Baha, and should it exceed this number it does not 
matter... It behoveth them to be the trusted ones of the 
Merciful among men and to regard themselves as the guardians 
appointed of God for all that dwell on earth. It is incumbent 
upon them to take counsel together and to have regard for the 
interests of the servants of God, for His sake, even as they 
regard their own interests, and to choose that which is meet 
and seemly. Thus hath the Lord your God, the Gracious, the 
Pardoner, commanded you. Beware lest ye put away that which is 
clearly revealed in His Tablet. Fear God, O ye that perceive. 
(Baha'u'llah, Synopsis and Codification of the Kitab-i-Aqdas, 
p. 13)

and this one also:
To repudiate the validity of the assemblies of the elected 
ministers of the Faith of Bahá'u'lláh would be to reject those 
countless Tablets of Bahá'u'lláh and 'Abdu'l-Bahá wherein They 
have extolled the station of the trustees of the Merciful, 
enumerated their privileges and duties, emphasized the glory 
of their mission, revealed the immensity of their task, and 
warned them of the attacks they must needs expect from the 
unwisdom of their friends as well as from the malice of their 
enemies. It is surely for those to whose hands so priceless a 
heritage has been committed to prayerfully watch lest the tool 
should supersede the Faith itself, lest undue concern for the 
minute details arising from the administration of the Cause 
obscure the vision of its promoters, lest partiality, 
ambition, and worldliness tend in the course of time to 
becloud the radiance, stain the purity, and impair the 
effectiveness of the Faith of Bahá'u'lláh.  (Shoghi Effendi, 
The World Order of Baha'u'llah, p. 9)

Now, if I were not aware of the Guardian's persnickety 
precision in his English translations, I might agree that all 
the previous post references referred to any Baha'i House of 
Justice.  However, I have no doubt that the Guardian 
understood the capitalization of proper nouns.  Having said 
that;  I did notice that there were two quotes from the 
Guardian, which I included before, where the word *trustees* 
was not capitalized.  I will also concede that there is a 
margin of error involved from written work to printed text... 
But, taking that into consideration does not outweigh my gut 
feeling.

In closing, I took a swim OCEAN and found no other references 
besides the two quoted here that literally ties the phrase 
trustees of the Merciful to Local Houses of Justice.  I view 
'Trustees of the Merciful' [as written] to be a specific title 
or phrase that constitutes the distinctive designation of this 
particular legislative body.

Lovingly, Sandra

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Scope of the House of Justice -VERY LONG

2005-01-29 Thread Smaneck




In a message dated 1/29/2005 6:55:36 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  "Now, if I were not aware of the Guardian's persnickety precision 
  in his English translations, I might agree that all the previous post 
  references referred to any Baha'i House of Justice. However, I have 
  no doubt that the Guardian understood the capitalization of proper 
  nouns."
  
  Dear Sandra, 
  
  Is that what your argument is based on, capitalization? Because as 
  far as I know there is not any convention whereby Baha'is are supposed to use 
  upper case letters to refer to the Universal House of Justice and lower case 
  when referring to other institutions. The only difference between those 
  passages using caps or not using caps as far as I can tell is that the former 
  are translated by the Guardian and the latter arelater translations. The 
  one exception I see is that passage from the Iqan and I don't think that is 
  referring to the members of the House of Justice at all. That strikes me 
  rather as a reference to the Manifestation and the authorized interpreters. 
  
  
  warmest, Susan 
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu