Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Countdown to your lab!
Of course nobody can say what their OEQs were without breaking NDA. The ones I got were hard for me because I was weak in those areas. I did not feel that all of them were 'CCNP' level questions but that is my opinion. I'm not weak in those areas any longer. I sat for my test back on August 26th. I failed because of the OEQs, I am pretty sure I passed the lab portion based on the percentages in my score report. I wish I had given myself a little more time for this test; I did not anticipate how demanding my work schedule would be over the last 3 months - as such I am a little further behind the ball than I would like to be. Still, I am far more prepared than I was last time. The problem is, there are more variables now than there were last time too. So it could be that I am in just as bad a shape now, even though I know more as I was back in August. It just depends on my karma I guess. =-) Whatever happens - happens, I'll give it my best shot and we'll see how it works out. I should be sleeping. =-) -Original Message- From: erik.fairbanks@fe.navy.mil [mailto:erik.fairbanks@fe.navy.mil] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 11:07 PM To: mich...@thelipseys.com; ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Countdown to your lab! Mike, How long ago did you make your last lab attempt? I took mine on the 31st of August and my OEQs were very fair - just as advertised. If you had been actually studying for the lab, they weren't a big deal. I managed to botch up my lab attempt in a whole other bunch of ways...hahaha I am still trying to figure out what those ways were, but that is a whole different story! Regardless, good luck and STAY CALM! :) -Erik -Original Message- From: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Michael Lipsey Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 9:56 AM To: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Countdown to your lab! Thanks guys, I appreciate the support. It was a decent drive up to San Jose from LA - a little windy but not bad. I listened to my IP Expert lectures focusing on the things that I felt I needed to. I think it was helpful. Overall, I know what I know pretty well but being that they had added what they added to the blue print - well I'm worried about 'CCIE Lab Karma' in that I'll get tested on that which I know the least. =-) Plus, I'm still completely freaked out about the OEQs which are what got me last time. I have not heard a single passing story yet which is not encouraging. All of the feedback we have seen so far - none of it has made me feel more confident. Such is life. I'll let you know how it goes after. =-) -Mike -Original Message- From: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ccie_rs-requ...@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 12:25 PM To: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Subject: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 45, Issue 153 Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ccie_rs-requ...@onlinestudylist.com You can reach the person managing the list at ccie_rs-ow...@onlinestudylist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest... Today's Topics: 1. Countdown to your lab! (nickst...@yahoo.com) 2. Re: Countdown to your lab! (Joe Astorino) 3. Re: Countdown to your lab! (Kim Pedersen) 4. RS Lab8 Question 8.8 (Jay Zitcovich (jzitcovi)) -- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:04:06 + From: nickst...@yahoo.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Countdown to your lab! To: mich...@lipsey.yahoo.com Cc: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Message-ID: 373451874-1256662798-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-111356415 7...@b da694.bisx.prod.on.blackberry Content-Type: text/plain Countdown! Hey Michael I know tomorrow is the day of your lab. go nail it! I just realized you could be in another time zone...but still go get it! Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -- Message: 2 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:32:45 -0400 From: Joe Astorino jastor...@ipexpert.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Countdown to your lab! To: nickst...@yahoo.com Cc: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com, mich...@lipsey.yahoo.com Message-ID: d77cbc750910271132i713bc18dh1d3f34bd11624...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Ditto! We will all be thinking of you dude...I hope you are the FIRST we hear about passing CCIE v4.0 : ) Best of luck, and can't wait to hear about your experience. On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:04 PM, nickst...@yahoo.com wrote: Countdown! Hey Michael I know tomorrow is the day of
Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Countdown to your lab!
At least you aren't taking your lab at RTP! Those dudes start EARLY out there (7:30) and it is East Coast time. I feel sorry for the folks traveling from the West Coast to take it - must be brutal. Well, good luck!! Let us know how it goes! p.s. Does the proctor in San Jose talk about his massive truck and livestock during the lunch break? Haha (RTP joke for anyone who has been there) -Original Message- From: Michael Lipsey [mailto:mich...@thelipseys.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 3:22 PM To: Fairbanks, Erik J. CTR USN NCSTFE-N3; ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Countdown to your lab! Of course nobody can say what their OEQs were without breaking NDA. The ones I got were hard for me because I was weak in those areas. I did not feel that all of them were 'CCNP' level questions but that is my opinion. I'm not weak in those areas any longer. I sat for my test back on August 26th. I failed because of the OEQs, I am pretty sure I passed the lab portion based on the percentages in my score report. I wish I had given myself a little more time for this test; I did not anticipate how demanding my work schedule would be over the last 3 months - as such I am a little further behind the ball than I would like to be. Still, I am far more prepared than I was last time. The problem is, there are more variables now than there were last time too. So it could be that I am in just as bad a shape now, even though I know more as I was back in August. It just depends on my karma I guess. =-) Whatever happens - happens, I'll give it my best shot and we'll see how it works out. I should be sleeping. =-) -Original Message- From: erik.fairbanks@fe.navy.mil [mailto:erik.fairbanks@fe.navy.mil] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 11:07 PM To: mich...@thelipseys.com; ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Countdown to your lab! Mike, How long ago did you make your last lab attempt? I took mine on the 31st of August and my OEQs were very fair - just as advertised. If you had been actually studying for the lab, they weren't a big deal. I managed to botch up my lab attempt in a whole other bunch of ways...hahaha I am still trying to figure out what those ways were, but that is a whole different story! Regardless, good luck and STAY CALM! :) -Erik -Original Message- From: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Michael Lipsey Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 9:56 AM To: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Countdown to your lab! Thanks guys, I appreciate the support. It was a decent drive up to San Jose from LA - a little windy but not bad. I listened to my IP Expert lectures focusing on the things that I felt I needed to. I think it was helpful. Overall, I know what I know pretty well but being that they had added what they added to the blue print - well I'm worried about 'CCIE Lab Karma' in that I'll get tested on that which I know the least. =-) Plus, I'm still completely freaked out about the OEQs which are what got me last time. I have not heard a single passing story yet which is not encouraging. All of the feedback we have seen so far - none of it has made me feel more confident. Such is life. I'll let you know how it goes after. =-) -Mike -Original Message- From: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ccie_rs-requ...@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 12:25 PM To: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Subject: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 45, Issue 153 Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ccie_rs-requ...@onlinestudylist.com You can reach the person managing the list at ccie_rs-ow...@onlinestudylist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest... Today's Topics: 1. Countdown to your lab! (nickst...@yahoo.com) 2. Re: Countdown to your lab! (Joe Astorino) 3. Re: Countdown to your lab! (Kim Pedersen) 4. RS Lab8 Question 8.8 (Jay Zitcovich (jzitcovi)) -- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:04:06 + From: nickst...@yahoo.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Countdown to your lab! To: mich...@lipsey.yahoo.com Cc: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Message-ID: 373451874-1256662798-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-111356415 7...@b da694.bisx.prod.on.blackberry Content-Type: text/plain Countdown! Hey Michael I know tomorrow is the day of your lab. go nail it! I just realized you could be in another time zone...but still go get it! Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Countdown to your lab!
Mike Karma is based on hard work. Rewards always come after hard work. Keep up hard study. You can do it!!! From: mich...@thelipseys.com To: erik.fairbanks@fe.navy.mil; ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:21:44 -0700 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Countdown to your lab! Of course nobody can say what their OEQs were without breaking NDA. The ones I got were hard for me because I was weak in those areas. I did not feel that all of them were 'CCNP' level questions but that is my opinion. I'm not weak in those areas any longer. I sat for my test back on August 26th. I failed because of the OEQs, I am pretty sure I passed the lab portion based on the percentages in my score report. I wish I had given myself a little more time for this test; I did not anticipate how demanding my work schedule would be over the last 3 months - as such I am a little further behind the ball than I would like to be. Still, I am far more prepared than I was last time. The problem is, there are more variables now than there were last time too. So it could be that I am in just as bad a shape now, even though I know more as I was back in August. It just depends on my karma I guess. =-) Whatever happens - happens, I'll give it my best shot and we'll see how it works out. I should be sleeping. =-) -Original Message- From: erik.fairbanks@fe.navy.mil [mailto:erik.fairbanks@fe.navy.mil] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 11:07 PM To: mich...@thelipseys.com; ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Countdown to your lab! Mike, How long ago did you make your last lab attempt? I took mine on the 31st of August and my OEQs were very fair - just as advertised. If you had been actually studying for the lab, they weren't a big deal. I managed to botch up my lab attempt in a whole other bunch of ways...hahaha I am still trying to figure out what those ways were, but that is a whole different story! Regardless, good luck and STAY CALM! :) -Erik -Original Message- From: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Michael Lipsey Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 9:56 AM To: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Countdown to your lab! Thanks guys, I appreciate the support. It was a decent drive up to San Jose from LA - a little windy but not bad. I listened to my IP Expert lectures focusing on the things that I felt I needed to. I think it was helpful. Overall, I know what I know pretty well but being that they had added what they added to the blue print - well I'm worried about 'CCIE Lab Karma' in that I'll get tested on that which I know the least. =-) Plus, I'm still completely freaked out about the OEQs which are what got me last time. I have not heard a single passing story yet which is not encouraging. All of the feedback we have seen so far - none of it has made me feel more confident. Such is life. I'll let you know how it goes after. =-) -Mike -Original Message- From: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ccie_rs-requ...@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 12:25 PM To: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Subject: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 45, Issue 153 Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ccie_rs-requ...@onlinestudylist.com You can reach the person managing the list at ccie_rs-ow...@onlinestudylist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest... Today's Topics: 1. Countdown to your lab! (nickst...@yahoo.com) 2. Re: Countdown to your lab! (Joe Astorino) 3. Re: Countdown to your lab! (Kim Pedersen) 4. RS Lab8 Question 8.8 (Jay Zitcovich (jzitcovi)) -- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:04:06 + From: nickst...@yahoo.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Countdown to your lab! To: mich...@lipsey.yahoo.com Cc: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Message-ID: 373451874-1256662798-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-111356415 7...@b da694.bisx.prod.on.blackberry Content-Type: text/plain Countdown! Hey Michael I know tomorrow is the day of your lab. go nail it! I just realized you could be in another time zone...but still go get it! Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -- Message: 2 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:32:45 -0400 From: Joe Astorino jastor...@ipexpert.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Countdown to your lab! To: nickst...@yahoo.com Cc: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com, mich...@lipsey.yahoo.com Message-ID:
Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] My lab v4.0 experience, for those of you dying to know
Hi Raj, During the troubleshooting lab you do at Cisco you will have access to ALL commands. It might though that in a particular question you are prohibited to use some show commands. We do that in some of our labs so we force you to use a different troubleshooting method. This will teach you how to troubleshoot your network, even if the show run looks fine. So keep in mind, it could be prohibited although I think it's a small chance in the real lab. Again our labs are designed to teach you right :-) -- Regards, Rick Mur CCIE2 #21946 (RS / Service Provider) Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com On 27 okt 2009, at 14:11, Dande Rajasekhar (drajasek) wrote: Guys, One quick question.I saw in ipexpert labs that we should not use show run during debugging/troubleshooting.Is it so ? In real lab does that matter whether we resolve the teacat or it too matters how we resolve it.For example: Does the script expect us to use so and so show command(may be we might have used debug command) ? -raj From: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_rs- boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Rick Mur Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 3:27 AM To: Steve Shaw Cc: jmangaw...@gmail.com; ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] My lab v4.0 experience,for those of you dying to know Great feedback!! I hear that the lab is quite fair from most people. I guess it's just the new environment and way of working which causes too much stress or confusion. I think Cisco did a great job in making it a fair exam, which focuses way more on the core technologies and troubleshooting than just knowing every stupid little command :-) I'm convinced that you will pass the next time! Keep up this spirit! -- Regards, Rick Mur CCIE2 #21946 (RS / Service Provider) Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com On 26 okt 2009, at 22:37, Steve Shaw wrote: Awesome feedback. Thanks! On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 5:09 PM, pra pa patelpr...@hotmail.com wrote: with all toppings!!! :-) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:06:24 -0500 From: jmangaw...@gmail.com To: nickst...@yahoo.com; ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] My lab v4.0 experience, for those of you dying to know Haha, yep. In my case, a $1400 slice of pizza! On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:01 PM, nickst...@yahoo.com wrote: Wow. Good feedback I just read your entire post so I need to digest it. It sounds like you are very close and sound very upbeat on your temporary defeat. At least you know have a gameplan on how to attack. 1400 dollar sandwich strikes again! Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: jmangawang jmangaw...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:39:42 To: CCIE OSLccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] My lab v4.0 experience, for those of you dying to know ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Windows 7: It helps you do more. Explore Windows 7. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] My lab v4.0 experience, for those of you dying to know
I can say that I didn't have any restrictions on what commands I could or couldn't use. The lab does state that you are graded on getting a working solution and that you shouldn't make large sweeping changes, I.e. Replace RIP with OSPF. I don't remember the exact wording, but that was th general idea. Most of my fixes were only a couple lines but sometimes on more than one device. -Original Message- From: Rick Mur r...@ipexpert.com Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 7:12 AM To: Dande Rajasekhar draja...@cisco.com Cc: Steve Shaw sha...@gmail.com; jmangaw...@gmail.com; ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] My lab v4.0 experience,for those of you dying to know Hi Raj, During the troubleshooting lab you do at Cisco you will have access to ALL commands. It might though that in a particular question you are prohibited to use some show commands. We do that in some of our labs so we force you to use a different troubleshooting method. This will teach you how to troubleshoot your network, even if the show run looks fine. So keep in mind, it could be prohibited although I think it's a small chance in the real lab. Again our labs are designed to teach you right :-) -- [The entire original message is not included] ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] My lab v4.0 experience, for those of you dying to know
Great feedback!!! Too bad you did not make it ... I hope next time will be better for you ... and the slice of pizza will not be that expensive. -- Regards, Iwan Hoogendoorn CCIE #13084 (RS / Security / SP) Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:39 PM, jmangawang jmangaw...@gmail.com wrote: Well, I took the v4.0 lab last week and even though I walked out knowing I failed, I was actually quite impressed with the test as a whole. I took my test in San Jose, mostly so that I could take advantage of gaining 2 extra hours (I live in Central time zone). First time I took my test, I went to RTP and lost an hour which really took a toll, since I had to wake up earlier also. Anyway, I did get my full 8 hours of sleep the night before, ate a decent breakfast and went on to Building C. There were two other candidates, one taking RS, the other taking SP. I chatted it up with the other RS candidate for about 20 minutes talking mostly about what I had read about regarding the new test format. If you haven't done so already, read these posts: http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/46561 and https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/8262. One other thing, I won't mention any specific topics that I got on my exam due to NDA, but I'll describe as best as I can the overall look and feel, as well as my impressions. The proctor took us to the lab room around 8:20am, gave us our seating assignments, then gave me and the other RS candidate an extra 5 minute set of instructions on how to log into the new web interface. Then we sat down and started our test. For those of you interested, you get 2 sheets of writing paper, and a 3rd sheet that has login info for the troubleshooting/lab config portion. You're in a half-height cubicle with one neighbor. You get a hodge podge of colored pencils and a really nice widescreen monitor. I use a 20 widescreen at work and these were way bigger, maybe 24? I don't know. But they were nice. The core knowledge/OEQs (open-ended questions) are 4 questions of which you must get 3 correct or you fail the whole exam. The proctor told us to use short, concise answers. He said it's because they don't like to read really long answers (that's not official, just something he said). When I failed the v3.0 test back in August, it was because of these OEQs. I made it a point to read any/everything in the Cisco Documentation site that pertained to a v4.0 Blueprint topic. I also made it a point to do as many show commands during my lab work, just so I'd know what I was look at. That definitely paid off because I got 1 question which I knew without thinking about, 2 others where I was 90% certain, and 1 which I had never seen before. Needless to say, I passed the section and I didn't even think twice about those questions once I started the troubleshooting section. Word of advice: Read the questions several times before answering. On the 2 that I was 90% sure of, I actually had written a different answer the first time, but based on specific words in the question/diagram, I ended up changing them. I'm glad I did. Next came the troubleshooting section. You have to bring us IE and log into a webpage using the 3rd piece of paper on your desk. Once in, you're given an opportunity to view screenshots of what the new interface looks like. Basically, the main page of the new interface is a full diagram of the network topology with menu buttons across the top. For the troubleshooting section, one menu opens a popup window showing one ticket at a time, another is a popup showing all tickets listed on a page, another is a control panel to reboot/restore configs on routers(troubleshooting only), another is some documentation about what to do/not do, and then there is the end exam button. The first menu also has diagrams showing things like BGP, routing, cabling, MPLS, etc. There's also a countdown timer in the upper right corner of the main page during the troubleshooting section, but not in the lab configuration portion. To bring up the console of one of the routers, just click on the picture within the diagram and SecureCRT opens up. One annoying thing is that if you have several router consoles up, then you click on the trouble ticket window, the main page covers up your console windows. This is described in more detail in one of the review links I posted up top. The troubleshooting section itself is not too bad, but can be a bit overwhelming at first. Keep in mind that you are learning a new interface and trying to understand a new topology and you only have 2 hours to do it in. You really need to keep calm, and focused, and not spend too much time figuring out how the topology is set up. Rather, go through the tickets, find the devices referenced in the tickets, and work the specific issues. I found most of my fixes were reasonably simple. As with any
Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] My lab v4.0 experience, for those of you dying to know
Here is the reasoning for NOT using show run while learning how to troubleshoot, if you learn to use the appropriate show and debug commands, you should find the trouble much quicker than if you have to rely on reading through the entire configuration on several routers. Something that has helped me is to try on debug commands before I begin configuring something. This allows me to see what is actually happening in a normal working environment. Then when I have problems in my network, I can run debugs and have better understanding of what is broken and why. Same with using tools like show ip ospf interface and show frame-relay map. If you rely on reading through the entire show run, you risk missing something. It's a lot easier in my opinion to review just the relevant output. Justin On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Jason jmangaw...@gmail.com wrote: I can say that I didn't have any restrictions on what commands I could or couldn't use. The lab does state that you are graded on getting a working solution and that you shouldn't make large sweeping changes, I.e. Replace RIP with OSPF. I don't remember the exact wording, but that was th general idea. Most of my fixes were only a couple lines but sometimes on more than one device. -Original Message- From: Rick Mur r...@ipexpert.com Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 7:12 AM To: Dande Rajasekhar draja...@cisco.com Cc: Steve Shaw sha...@gmail.com; jmangaw...@gmail.com; ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] My lab v4.0 experience,for those of you dying to know Hi Raj, During the troubleshooting lab you do at Cisco you will have access to ALL commands. It might though that in a particular question you are prohibited to use some show commands. We do that in some of our labs so we force you to use a different troubleshooting method. This will teach you how to troubleshoot your network, even if the show run looks fine. So keep in mind, it could be prohibited although I think it's a small chance in the real lab. Again our labs are designed to teach you right :-) -- [The entire original message is not included] ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Justin G. Mitchell http://www.google.com/profiles/jgmitchell ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] R S version 4
Good luck with your attempt! -- Regards, Iwan Hoogendoorn CCIE #13084 (RS / Security / SP) Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Tunde Kushimo kush...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Fabio, Many thanks for the wonderful lab experience share, i appreciate it alot. The information will help me shape myself for my attemp coming up early next year. Best of on your next Lab. Frm Tunde Kushimo Converged Internetwork Solutions. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_RS] 'help'
en conf t hostname HUB int lo0 ip add 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 int s0 enc frame no shu no frame inverse-arp ip add 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0 frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.2 102 b frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.3 103 b router eigrp 100 no auto net 172.16.1.1 0.0.0.0 net 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 en conf t hostname SPOKE1 int lo0 ip add 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 int s0 enc frame no shu no frame inverse-arp ip add 172.16.1.2 255.255.255.0 frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.1 201 b frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.3 201 b router eigrp 100 no auto net 172.16.1.2 0.0.0.0 net 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0 Hi I have done below config in a very simple hub and 2 spoke connection.Eigrp neighbor did not come up between hub and spoke.When I remove net 2.2.2.2 under router eigrp it came up.what was wrong?Can someone help me in order to undestand? Many thanks. en conf t hostname SPOKE2 int lo0 ip add 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.0 int s0 enc frame no shu no frame inverse-arp ip add 172.16.1.3 255.255.255.0 frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.1 301 b frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.2 301 b router eigrp 100 no auto net 172.16.1.3 0.0.0.0 net 3.3.3.3 0.0.0.0 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] 'help'
Did you turn off split horizon? Since you are not using sub- interfaces, the router isnt going to send out any networks that it heard on the same interface... Try turning off split horizon... That might fix the issue. no ip split-horizon eigrp # HTHs a little On Oct 28, 2009, at 8:55 AM, Mustafa Yadav wrote: en conf t hostname HUB int lo0 ip add 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 int s0 enc frame no shu no frame inverse-arp ip add 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0 frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.2 102 b frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.3 103 b router eigrp 100 no auto net 172.16.1.1 0.0.0.0 net 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 en conf t hostname SPOKE1 int lo0 ip add2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 int s0 enc frame no shu no frame inverse-arp ip add 172.16.1.2 255.255.255.0 frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.1 201 b frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.3 201 b router eigrp 100 no auto net 172.16.1.2 0.0.0.0 net 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0 Hi I have done below config in a very simple hub and 2 spoke connection.Eigrp neighbor did not come up between hub and spoke.When I remove net 2.2.2.2 under router eigrp it came up.what was wrong?Can someone help me in order to undestand? Many thanks. en conf t hostname SPOKE2 int lo0 ip add 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.0 int s0 enc frame no shu no frame inverse-arp ip add 172.16.1.3 255.255.255.0 frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.1 301 b frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.2 301 b router eigrp 100 no auto net 172.16.1.3 0.0.0.0 net 3.3.3.3 0.0.0.0 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] 'help'
Mustafa, That doesn't sound quite right. Are you saying that EIGRP neighbor will not come unless you remove network 2.2.2.2 from the spoke? Or are you saying the route is not advertised to the other spoke? On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Mustafa Yadav mustafa.ya...@gmail.comwrote: en conf t hostname HUB int lo0 ip add 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 int s0 enc frame no shu no frame inverse-arp ip add 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0 frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.2 102 b frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.3 103 b router eigrp 100 no auto net 172.16.1.1 0.0.0.0 net 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 en conf t hostname SPOKE1 int lo0 ip add 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 int s0 enc frame no shu no frame inverse-arp ip add 172.16.1.2 255.255.255.0 frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.1 201 b frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.3 201 b router eigrp 100 no auto net 172.16.1.2 0.0.0.0 net 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0 Hi I have done below config in a very simple hub and 2 spoke connection.Eigrp neighbor did not come up between hub and spoke.When I remove net 2.2.2.2 under router eigrp it came up.what was wrong?Can someone help me in order to undestand? Many thanks. en conf t hostname SPOKE2 int lo0 ip add 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.0 int s0 enc frame no shu no frame inverse-arp ip add 172.16.1.3 255.255.255.0 frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.1 301 b frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.2 301 b router eigrp 100 no auto net 172.16.1.3 0.0.0.0 net 3.3.3.3 0.0.0.0 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Bryan Bartik CCIE #23707 (RS), CCNP Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] 'help'
HUB# 00:06:47: EIGRP: Sending HELLO on Loopback0 00:06:47: AS 100, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 00:06:47: EIGRP: Received HELLO on Loopback0 nbr 1.1.1.1 00:06:47: AS 100, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 00:06:47: EIGRP: Packet from ourselves ignored 00:06:49: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, changed state to down i am getting above error.I do nt undestand how loopback int get hello packet.did I make something wrong. On 10/28/09, Bryan Bartik bbar...@ipexpert.com wrote: Mustafa, That doesn't sound quite right. Are you saying that EIGRP neighbor will not come unless you remove network 2.2.2.2 from the spoke? Or are you saying the route is not advertised to the other spoke? On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Mustafa Yadav mustafa.ya...@gmail.comwrote: en conf t hostname HUB int lo0 ip add 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 int s0 enc frame no shu no frame inverse-arp ip add 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0 frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.2 102 b frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.3 103 b router eigrp 100 no auto net 172.16.1.1 0.0.0.0 net 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 en conf t hostname SPOKE1 int lo0 ip add 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 int s0 enc frame no shu no frame inverse-arp ip add 172.16.1.2 255.255.255.0 frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.1 201 b frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.3 201 b router eigrp 100 no auto net 172.16.1.2 0.0.0.0 net 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0 Hi I have done below config in a very simple hub and 2 spoke connection.Eigrp neighbor did not come up between hub and spoke.When I remove net 2.2.2.2 under router eigrp it came up.what was wrong?Can someone help me in order to undestand? Many thanks. en conf t hostname SPOKE2 int lo0 ip add 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.0 int s0 enc frame no shu no frame inverse-arp ip add 172.16.1.3 255.255.255.0 frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.1 301 b frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.2 301 b router eigrp 100 no auto net 172.16.1.3 0.0.0.0 net 3.3.3.3 0.0.0.0 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Bryan Bartik CCIE #23707 (RS), CCNP Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] 'help'
Hellos are sent on all packets covered under the network statements. Since they are not needed on loopbacks, you can use passive-interface to prevent them. On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Mustafa Yadav mustafa.ya...@gmail.comwrote: HUB# 00:06:47: EIGRP: Sending HELLO on Loopback0 00:06:47: AS 100, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 00:06:47: EIGRP: Received HELLO on Loopback0 nbr 1.1.1.1 00:06:47: AS 100, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 00:06:47: EIGRP: Packet from ourselves ignored 00:06:49: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, changed state to down i am getting above error.I do nt undestand how loopback int get hello packet.did I make something wrong. On 10/28/09, Bryan Bartik bbar...@ipexpert.com wrote: Mustafa, That doesn't sound quite right. Are you saying that EIGRP neighbor will not come unless you remove network 2.2.2.2 from the spoke? Or are you saying the route is not advertised to the other spoke? On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Mustafa Yadav mustafa.ya...@gmail.comwrote: en conf t hostname HUB int lo0 ip add 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 int s0 enc frame no shu no frame inverse-arp ip add 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0 frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.2 102 b frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.3 103 b router eigrp 100 no auto net 172.16.1.1 0.0.0.0 net 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 en conf t hostname SPOKE1 int lo0 ip add 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 int s0 enc frame no shu no frame inverse-arp ip add 172.16.1.2 255.255.255.0 frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.1 201 b frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.3 201 b router eigrp 100 no auto net 172.16.1.2 0.0.0.0 net 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0 Hi I have done below config in a very simple hub and 2 spoke connection.Eigrp neighbor did not come up between hub and spoke.When I remove net 2.2.2.2 under router eigrp it came up.what was wrong?Can someone help me in order to undestand? Many thanks. en conf t hostname SPOKE2 int lo0 ip add 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.0 int s0 enc frame no shu no frame inverse-arp ip add 172.16.1.3 255.255.255.0 frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.1 301 b frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.2 301 b router eigrp 100 no auto net 172.16.1.3 0.0.0.0 net 3.3.3.3 0.0.0.0 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Bryan Bartik CCIE #23707 (RS), CCNP Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com -- Bryan Bartik CCIE #23707 (RS), CCNP Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] 'help'
Thanks Bryan.I did as you said.It has worked.Sorry if my question is too light for you gurus. On 10/28/09, Bryan Bartik bbar...@ipexpert.com wrote: Hellos are sent on all packets covered under the network statements. Since they are not needed on loopbacks, you can use passive-interface to prevent them. On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Mustafa Yadav mustafa.ya...@gmail.comwrote: HUB# 00:06:47: EIGRP: Sending HELLO on Loopback0 00:06:47: AS 100, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 00:06:47: EIGRP: Received HELLO on Loopback0 nbr 1.1.1.1 00:06:47: AS 100, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 00:06:47: EIGRP: Packet from ourselves ignored 00:06:49: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, changed state to down i am getting above error.I do nt undestand how loopback int get hello packet.did I make something wrong. On 10/28/09, Bryan Bartik bbar...@ipexpert.com wrote: Mustafa, That doesn't sound quite right. Are you saying that EIGRP neighbor will not come unless you remove network 2.2.2.2 from the spoke? Or are you saying the route is not advertised to the other spoke? On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Mustafa Yadav mustafa.ya...@gmail.comwrote: en conf t hostname HUB int lo0 ip add 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 int s0 enc frame no shu no frame inverse-arp ip add 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0 frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.2 102 b frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.3 103 b router eigrp 100 no auto net 172.16.1.1 0.0.0.0 net 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 en conf t hostname SPOKE1 int lo0 ip add 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 int s0 enc frame no shu no frame inverse-arp ip add 172.16.1.2 255.255.255.0 frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.1 201 b frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.3 201 b router eigrp 100 no auto net 172.16.1.2 0.0.0.0 net 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0 Hi I have done below config in a very simple hub and 2 spoke connection.Eigrp neighbor did not come up between hub and spoke.When I remove net 2.2.2.2 under router eigrp it came up.what was wrong?Can someone help me in order to undestand? Many thanks. en conf t hostname SPOKE2 int lo0 ip add 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.0 int s0 enc frame no shu no frame inverse-arp ip add 172.16.1.3 255.255.255.0 frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.1 301 b frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.2 301 b router eigrp 100 no auto net 172.16.1.3 0.0.0.0 net 3.3.3.3 0.0.0.0 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Bryan Bartik CCIE #23707 (RS), CCNP Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com -- Bryan Bartik CCIE #23707 (RS), CCNP Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_RS] Active Deleted PVC
Hi guys, I have a weird situation.I am using GN3 for a hubspoke lab.I see my pvcs in hub is flabbing between deleted and active.But there is no any problem in spokes.Please have a look at below output.I see under sh int a lot of missed LMI stats received.What can be a cause for this problem? HUB#sh frame-relay pvc PVC Statistics for interface Serial0 (Frame Relay DTE) Active Inactive Deleted Static Local 2000 Switched 0000 Unused 0000 DLCI = 101, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE = Serial0 input pkts 130 output pkts 98 in bytes 10427 out bytes 7731 dropped pkts 0 in pkts dropped 0 out pkts dropped 0out bytes dropped 0 in FECN pkts 0 in BECN pkts 0 out FECN pkts 0 out BECN pkts 0 in DE pkts 0 out DE pkts 0 out bcast pkts 0 out bcast bytes 0 pvc create time 01:00:21, last time pvc status changed 00:07:45 DLCI = 103, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE = Serial0 input pkts 170 output pkts 97 in bytes 11951 out bytes 7645 dropped pkts 0 in pkts dropped 0 out pkts dropped 0out bytes dropped 0 in FECN pkts 0 in BECN pkts 0 out FECN pkts 0 out BECN pkts 0 in DE pkts 0 out DE pkts 0 out bcast pkts 0 out bcast bytes 0 pvc create time 01:00:30, last time pvc status changed 00:07:53 HUB# HUB# HUB# sh run int s0 Building configuration... Current configuration : 234 bytes ! interface Serial0 ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.3 103 broadcast frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.2 101 broadcast no frame-relay inverse-arp frame-relay lmi-type ansi end HUB#sh int serial 0 Serial0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is PowerQUICC Serial Internet address is 172.16.1.1/24 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY, loopback not set Keepalive set (10 sec) LMI enq sent 342, LMI stat recvd 218, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI up LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 LMI DLCI 0 LMI type is ANSI Annex D frame relay DTE FR SVC disabled, LAPF state down Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 0/0, interface broadcasts 0 Last input 00:00:07, output 00:00:07, output hang never Last clearing of show interface counters 00:57:55 Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/6/256 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) Available Bandwidth 1158 kilobits/sec 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 1705 packets input, 114806 bytes, 0 no buffer SPOKE2# sh run int s0 Building configuration... Current configuration : 234 bytes ! interface Serial0 ip address 172.16.1.3 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.1 301 broadcast frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.2 301 broadcast no frame-relay inverse-arp frame-relay lmi-type ansi end SPOKE2#sh int ser SPOKE2#sh int serial 0 Serial0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is PowerQUICC Serial Internet address is 172.16.1.3/24 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY, loopback not set Keepalive set (10 sec) LMI enq sent 351, LMI stat recvd 352, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI up LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 LMI DLCI 0 LMI type is ANSI Annex D frame relay DTE FR SVC disabled, LAPF state down Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 12/0, interface broadcasts 6 Last input 00:00:05, output 00:00:05, output hang never Last clearing of show interface counters 00:58:37 Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/1/256 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) Available Bandwidth 1158 kilobits/sec 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 605 packets input, 24025 bytes, 0 no buffer --More-- ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_RS] Mark Snow Left Ipexpert?
So I was checking my ccie blogs and saw a snippet that Mark snow took off to work for INE. So first it was Scott Morris and now Mark Snow now working for INE. I guess some restructuring is going on at Ipexpert or something? Just curious as to why he took off, if this is indeed true? Curiosity is making mecurious. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Mark Snow Left Ipexpert?
Mark Snow, dual CCIE (CCIE #14073) has joined Internetwork Expert as a CCIE Voice Instructor. Mark brings years of teaching, technical writing, and consulting experience to Internetwork Expert. Mark’s certifications include two CCIEs, (Voice and Security), CCVP, CCNP, CCDP, CSE, CQS-CIPCCES, CQS-CIPTDS, CQS-CIPTOS, CQS-CIPTSS, MCSE. Mark’s reputation for teaching and product development is highly regarded in the voice networking community, and will be a great addition to the team at Internetwork Expert. Mark will be joining Internetwork Expert’s leading CCIE instructor team led by five time CCIE Brian Dennis (CCIE #2210), four time CCIEs Scott Morris (CCIE #4713) and Petr Lapukhov (CCIE #16379), three time CCIE Brian McGahan (CCIE #8593), three time CCIE Marvin Greenlee (CCIE #12237), two time CCIE Keith Barker (CCIE #6783) and CCIE Anthony Sequeira (CCIE #15626). Internetwork Expert is proud to have Mark join our Voice team and looks forward to his contributions. On Oct 28, 2009, at 3:08 PM, nicholas golden wrote: So I was checking my ccie blogs and saw a snippet that Mark snow took off to work for INE. So first it was Scott Morris and now Mark Snow now working for INE. I guess some restructuring is going on at Ipexpert or something? Just curious as to why he took off, if this is indeed true? Curiosity is making mecurious. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Mark Snow Left Ipexpert?
Yea I just went to ine and found just as you were posting it ;) la la la. Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Adrian Brayton abray...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:13:44 To: nicholas goldennickst...@yahoo.com Cc: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Mark Snow Left Ipexpert? Mark Snow, dual CCIE (CCIE #14073) has joined Internetwork Expert as a CCIE Voice Instructor. Mark brings years of teaching, technical writing, and consulting experience to Internetwork Expert. Mark’s certifications include two CCIEs, (Voice and Security), CCVP, CCNP, CCDP, CSE, CQS-CIPCCES, CQS-CIPTDS, CQS-CIPTOS, CQS-CIPTSS, MCSE. Mark’s reputation for teaching and product development is highly regarded in the voice networking community, and will be a great addition to the team at Internetwork Expert. Mark will be joining Internetwork Expert’s leading CCIE instructor team led by five time CCIE Brian Dennis (CCIE #2210), four time CCIEs Scott Morris (CCIE #4713) and Petr Lapukhov (CCIE #16379), three time CCIE Brian McGahan (CCIE #8593), three time CCIE Marvin Greenlee (CCIE #12237), two time CCIE Keith Barker (CCIE #6783) and CCIE Anthony Sequeira (CCIE #15626). Internetwork Expert is proud to have Mark join our Voice team and looks forward to his contributions. On Oct 28, 2009, at 3:08 PM, nicholas golden wrote: So I was checking my ccie blogs and saw a snippet that Mark snow took off to work for INE. So first it was Scott Morris and now Mark Snow now working for INE. I guess some restructuring is going on at Ipexpert or something? Just curious as to why he took off, if this is indeed true? Curiosity is making mecurious. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Mark Snow Left Ipexpert?
Wow I just wondering why INE took all IPexpert trainer ? Hmmm but actually I prefer Vik Malhi as my instructor when I go for my Voice next year after RS :). On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 2:20 AM, nickst...@yahoo.com wrote: Yea I just went to ine and found just as you were posting it ;) la la la. Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -- *From: * Adrian Brayton abray...@gmail.com *Date: *Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:13:44 -0400 *To: *nicholas goldennickst...@yahoo.com *Cc: *ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com *Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Mark Snow Left Ipexpert? Mark Snow, dual CCIE (CCIE #14073) has joined Internetwork Expert as a CCIE Voice Instructor. Mark brings years of teaching, technical writing, and consulting experience to Internetwork Expert. Mark’s certifications include two CCIEs, (Voice and Security), CCVP, CCNP, CCDP, CSE, CQS-CIPCCES, CQS-CIPTDS, CQS-CIPTOS, CQS-CIPTSS, MCSE. Mark’s reputation for teaching and product development is highly regarded in the voice networking community, and will be a great addition to the team at Internetwork Expert. Mark will be joining Internetwork Expert’s leading CCIE instructor team led by five time CCIE Brian Dennis (CCIE #2210), four time CCIEs Scott Morris (CCIE #4713) and Petr Lapukhov (CCIE #16379), three time CCIE Brian McGahan (CCIE #8593), three time CCIE Marvin Greenlee (CCIE #12237), two time CCIE Keith Barker (CCIE #6783) and CCIE Anthony Sequeira (CCIE #15626). Internetwork Expert is proud to have Mark join our Voice team and looks forward to his contributions. On Oct 28, 2009, at 3:08 PM, nicholas golden wrote: So I was checking my ccie blogs and saw a snippet that Mark snow took off to work for INE. So first it was Scott Morris and now Mark Snow now working for INE. I guess some restructuring is going on at Ipexpert or something? Just curious as to why he took off, if this is indeed true? Curiosity is making mecurious. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Mark Snow Left Ipexpert?
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 3:08 PM, nicholas golden nickst...@yahoo.comwrote: So I was checking my ccie blogs and saw a snippet that Mark snow took off to work for INE. So first it was Scott Morris and now Mark Snow now working for INE. I guess some restructuring is going on at Ipexpert or something? Just curious as to why he took off, if this is indeed true? Curiosity is making mecurious. This has been discussed already on the voice list: http://www.mail-archive.com/ccie_vo...@onlinestudylist.com/index.html#12749 -- Jeremy L. Gaddis http://evilrouters.net/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Active Deleted PVC
I've seen this before. If you have these kind of layer 2 issues, stop dynamips, delete the cache files (generated in your homefolder) and restart it again. -- Rick Mur CCIE2 #21946 (RS, Service provider) Sr. Support Engineer -- IPexpert, Inc. Sent from my iPhone On 28 okt 2009, at 19:40, Mustafa Yadav mustafa.ya...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, I have a weird situation.I am using GN3 for a hubspoke lab.I see my pvcs in hub is flabbing between deleted and active.But there is no any problem in spokes.Please have a look at below output.I see under sh int a lot of missed LMI stats received.What can be a cause for this problem? HUB#sh frame-relay pvc PVC Statistics for interface Serial0 (Frame Relay DTE) Active Inactive Deleted Static Local 2000 Switched 0000 Unused 0000 DLCI = 101, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE = Serial0 input pkts 130 output pkts 98 in bytes 10427 out bytes 7731 dropped pkts 0 in pkts dropped 0 out pkts dropped 0out bytes dropped 0 in FECN pkts 0 in BECN pkts 0 out FECN pkts 0 out BECN pkts 0 in DE pkts 0 out DE pkts 0 out bcast pkts 0 out bcast bytes 0 pvc create time 01:00:21, last time pvc status changed 00:07:45 DLCI = 103, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE = Serial0 input pkts 170 output pkts 97 in bytes 11951 out bytes 7645 dropped pkts 0 in pkts dropped 0 out pkts dropped 0out bytes dropped 0 in FECN pkts 0 in BECN pkts 0 out FECN pkts 0 out BECN pkts 0 in DE pkts 0 out DE pkts 0 out bcast pkts 0 out bcast bytes 0 pvc create time 01:00:30, last time pvc status changed 00:07:53 HUB# HUB# HUB# sh run int s0 Building configuration... Current configuration : 234 bytes ! interface Serial0 ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.3 103 broadcast frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.2 101 broadcast no frame-relay inverse-arp frame-relay lmi-type ansi end HUB#sh int serial 0 Serial0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is PowerQUICC Serial Internet address is 172.16.1.1/24 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY, loopback not set Keepalive set (10 sec) LMI enq sent 342, LMI stat recvd 218, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI up LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 LMI DLCI 0 LMI type is ANSI Annex D frame relay DTE FR SVC disabled, LAPF state down Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 0/0, interface broadcasts 0 Last input 00:00:07, output 00:00:07, output hang never Last clearing of show interface counters 00:57:55 Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/6/256 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) Available Bandwidth 1158 kilobits/sec 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 1705 packets input, 114806 bytes, 0 no buffer SPOKE2# sh run int s0 Building configuration... Current configuration : 234 bytes ! interface Serial0 ip address 172.16.1.3 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.1 301 broadcast frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.2 301 broadcast no frame-relay inverse-arp frame-relay lmi-type ansi end SPOKE2#sh int ser SPOKE2#sh int serial 0 Serial0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is PowerQUICC Serial Internet address is 172.16.1.3/24 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY, loopback not set Keepalive set (10 sec) LMI enq sent 351, LMI stat recvd 352, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI up LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 LMI DLCI 0 LMI type is ANSI Annex D frame relay DTE FR SVC disabled, LAPF state down Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 12/0, interface broadcasts 6 Last input 00:00:05, output 00:00:05, output hang never Last clearing of show interface counters 00:58:37 Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/1/256 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) Available Bandwidth 1158 kilobits/sec 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 605
Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] 'help'
No questions is too light. You wouldn't believe some of the stuff that still gets us stumped :) On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Mustafa Yadav mustafa.ya...@gmail.comwrote: Thanks Bryan.I did as you said.It has worked.Sorry if my question is too light for you gurus. On 10/28/09, Bryan Bartik bbar...@ipexpert.com wrote: Hellos are sent on all packets covered under the network statements. Since they are not needed on loopbacks, you can use passive-interface to prevent them. On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Mustafa Yadav mustafa.ya...@gmail.comwrote: HUB# 00:06:47: EIGRP: Sending HELLO on Loopback0 00:06:47: AS 100, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 00:06:47: EIGRP: Received HELLO on Loopback0 nbr 1.1.1.1 00:06:47: AS 100, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 00:06:47: EIGRP: Packet from ourselves ignored 00:06:49: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, changed state to down i am getting above error.I do nt undestand how loopback int get hello packet.did I make something wrong. On 10/28/09, Bryan Bartik bbar...@ipexpert.com wrote: Mustafa, That doesn't sound quite right. Are you saying that EIGRP neighbor will not come unless you remove network 2.2.2.2 from the spoke? Or are you saying the route is not advertised to the other spoke? On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Mustafa Yadav mustafa.ya...@gmail.comwrote: en conf t hostname HUB int lo0 ip add 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 int s0 enc frame no shu no frame inverse-arp ip add 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0 frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.2 102 b frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.3 103 b router eigrp 100 no auto net 172.16.1.1 0.0.0.0 net 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 en conf t hostname SPOKE1 int lo0 ip add 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 int s0 enc frame no shu no frame inverse-arp ip add 172.16.1.2 255.255.255.0 frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.1 201 b frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.3 201 b router eigrp 100 no auto net 172.16.1.2 0.0.0.0 net 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0 Hi I have done below config in a very simple hub and 2 spoke connection.Eigrp neighbor did not come up between hub and spoke.When I remove net 2.2.2.2 under router eigrp it came up.what was wrong?Can someone help me in order to undestand? Many thanks. en conf t hostname SPOKE2 int lo0 ip add 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.0 int s0 enc frame no shu no frame inverse-arp ip add 172.16.1.3 255.255.255.0 frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.1 301 b frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.2 301 b router eigrp 100 no auto net 172.16.1.3 0.0.0.0 net 3.3.3.3 0.0.0.0 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Bryan Bartik CCIE #23707 (RS), CCNP Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com -- Bryan Bartik CCIE #23707 (RS), CCNP Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com -- Bryan Bartik CCIE #23707 (RS), CCNP Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Mark Snow Left Ipexpert?
C'mon guys, get over it. The sky is not falling down. The ICT training sector is no different to any other part of the industry; people change jobs *all the time*. It's only that these people, within our small geeky corner of the world, have a relatively high profile. I have no doubt it's a healthy thing for all concerned. Now, where is Jared Scrivener? On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Antonio Dee antonio_...@hotmail.com wrote: I'm also really curious what's going on :-( I love IPExpert and Proctorlabs, made me a CCIE for sure Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 03:00:54 +0700 From: ulybati...@gmail.com To: nickst...@yahoo.com CC: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Mark Snow Left Ipexpert? Wow I just wondering why INE took all IPexpert trainer ? Hmmm but actually I prefer Vik Malhi as my instructor when I go for my Voice next year after RS :). On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 2:20 AM, nickst...@yahoo.com wrote: Yea I just went to ine and found just as you were posting it ;) la la la. From: Adrian Brayton abray...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:13:44 -0400 So I was checking my ccie blogs and saw a snippet that Mark snow took off to work for INE. So first it was Scott Morris and now Mark Snow now working for INE. I guess some restructuring is going on at Ipexpert or something? Just curious as to why he took off, if this is indeed true? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Mark Snow Left Ipexpert?
Where is Jared?! Did you hear a rumor of him leaving? He was my bootcamp instructor. I thought he was bright and did a good job. I am perfecting my Australian accent to pick up chicks! :) -Original Message- From: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Dale Shaw Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 8:04 AM To: CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Mark Snow Left Ipexpert? C'mon guys, get over it. The sky is not falling down. The ICT training sector is no different to any other part of the industry; people change jobs *all the time*. It's only that these people, within our small geeky corner of the world, have a relatively high profile. I have no doubt it's a healthy thing for all concerned. Now, where is Jared Scrivener? On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Antonio Dee antonio_...@hotmail.com wrote: I'm also really curious what's going on :-( I love IPExpert and Proctorlabs, made me a CCIE for sure Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 03:00:54 +0700 From: ulybati...@gmail.com To: nickst...@yahoo.com CC: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Mark Snow Left Ipexpert? Wow I just wondering why INE took all IPexpert trainer ? Hmmm but actually I prefer Vik Malhi as my instructor when I go for my Voice next year after RS :). On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 2:20 AM, nickst...@yahoo.com wrote: Yea I just went to ine and found just as you were posting it ;) la la la. From: Adrian Brayton abray...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:13:44 -0400 So I was checking my ccie blogs and saw a snippet that Mark snow took off to work for INE. So first it was Scott Morris and now Mark Snow now working for INE. I guess some restructuring is going on at Ipexpert or something? Just curious as to why he took off, if this is indeed true? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_RS] Access Denied - No Prints Remaining
Has anyone received this error while trying to print a lab book? This is the first time I have tried to print ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Access Denied - No Prints Remaining
Hey Erik. The PDFs have a limited number of times you can print them. What happens is when you open up the document, it will contact a server online. Are you connected to the net when trying to print? If you have not printed the document at all yet, just contact our support team and they will be glad to help you out there! On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:55 PM, erik.fairbanks@fe.navy.mil wrote: Has anyone received this error while trying to print a lab book? This is the first time I have tried to print ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Regards, Joe Astorino CCIE #24347 (RS) Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert Mailto: jastor...@ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat eFax: +1.810.454.0130 IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA (RS, Voice Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (RS, Voice, Security Service Provider) Certification Training with locations throughout the United States, Europe and Australia. Be sure to check out our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Countdown to your lab!
Anxiously awaiting ... : ) On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:43 AM, pra pa patelpr...@hotmail.com wrote: Mike Karma is based on hard work. Rewards always come after hard work. Keep up hard study. You can do it!!! From: mich...@thelipseys.com To: erik.fairbanks@fe.navy.mil; ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:21:44 -0700 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Countdown to your lab! Of course nobody can say what their OEQs were without breaking NDA. The ones I got were hard for me because I was weak in those areas. I did not feel that all of them were 'CCNP' level questions but that is my opinion. I'm not weak in those areas any longer. I sat for my test back on August 26th. I failed because of the OEQs, I am pretty sure I passed the lab portion based on the percentages in my score report. I wish I had given myself a little more time for this test; I did not anticipate how demanding my work schedule would be over the last 3 months - as such I am a little further behind the ball than I would like to be. Still, I am far more prepared than I was last time. The problem is, there are more variables now than there were last time too. So it could be that I am in just as bad a shape now, even though I know more as I was back in August. It just depends on my karma I guess. =-) Whatever happens - happens, I'll give it my best shot and we'll see how it works out. I should be sleeping. =-) -Original Message- From: erik.fairbanks@fe.navy.mil [mailto: erik.fairbanks@fe.navy.mil] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 11:07 PM To: mich...@thelipseys.com; ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Countdown to your lab! Mike, How long ago did you make your last lab attempt? I took mine on the 31st of August and my OEQs were very fair - just as advertised. If you had been actually studying for the lab, they weren't a big deal. I managed to botch up my lab attempt in a whole other bunch of ways...hahaha I am still trying to figure out what those ways were, but that is a whole different story! Regardless, good luck and STAY CALM! :) -Erik -Original Message- From: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Michael Lipsey Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 9:56 AM To: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Countdown to your lab! Thanks guys, I appreciate the support. It was a decent drive up to San Jose from LA - a little windy but not bad. I listened to my IP Expert lectures focusing on the things that I felt I needed to. I think it was helpful. Overall, I know what I know pretty well but being that they had added what they added to the blue print - well I'm worried about 'CCIE Lab Karma' in that I'll get tested on that which I know the least. =-) Plus, I'm still completely freaked out about the OEQs which are what got me last time. I have not heard a single passing story yet which is not encouraging. All of the feedback we have seen so far - none of it has made me feel more confident. Such is life. I'll let you know how it goes after. =-) -Mike -Original Message- From: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ccie_rs-requ...@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 12:25 PM To: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Subject: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 45, Issue 153 Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ccie_rs-requ...@onlinestudylist.com You can reach the person managing the list at ccie_rs-ow...@onlinestudylist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest... Today's Topics: 1. Countdown to your lab! (nickst...@yahoo.com) 2. Re: Countdown to your lab! (Joe Astorino) 3. Re: Countdown to your lab! (Kim Pedersen) 4. RS Lab8 Question 8.8 (Jay Zitcovich (jzitcovi)) -- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:04:06 + From: nickst...@yahoo.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Countdown to your lab! To: mich...@lipsey.yahoo.com Cc: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Message-ID: 373451874-1256662798-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-111356415 7...@b da694.bisx.prod.on.blackberry Content-Type: text/plain Countdown! Hey Michael I know tomorrow is the day of your lab. go nail it! I just realized you could be in another time zone...but still go get it! Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -- Message: 2 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:32:45 -0400 From: Joe
Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Access Denied - No Prints Remaining
I am currently behind a restrictive proxy and firewall...probably the issue. I will try printing from another location. If I still have problems, I will contact support. Thanks! -Erik -Original Message- From: Joe Astorino [mailto:jastor...@ipexpert.com] Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 12:00 PM To: Fairbanks, Erik J. CTR USN NCSTFE-N3 Cc: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Access Denied - No Prints Remaining Hey Erik. The PDFs have a limited number of times you can print them. What happens is when you open up the document, it will contact a server online. Are you connected to the net when trying to print? If you have not printed the document at all yet, just contact our support team and they will be glad to help you out there! On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:55 PM, erik.fairbanks@fe.navy.mil wrote: Has anyone received this error while trying to print a lab book? This is the first time I have tried to print ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Regards, Joe Astorino CCIE #24347 (RS) Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert Mailto: jastor...@ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat eFax: +1.810.454.0130 IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA (RS, Voice Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (RS, Voice, Security Service Provider) Certification Training with locations throughout the United States, Europe and Australia. Be sure to check out our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Countdown to your lab!
Same here waiting to here back anxiously Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Joe Astorino jastor...@ipexpert.com Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:01:08 To: pra papatelpr...@hotmail.com Cc: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com; erik.fairbanks@fe.navy.mil; mich...@thelipseys.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Countdown to your lab! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_RS] GN3 console problem
___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_RS] gn3 console problem
I am using gn3 form my lab tests.After opening 3 or 4 console it seems everything fine.Even I can work almost half an hour.But suddenly all console windows dissapear and I am unable to log in again via console. Has anyone encountered this kind of situation before? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] My V4 Experience
Hey Mike, Sorry to hear about the temporary setback buddy...you can bet we were all rooting for you back here at IPexpert and the OSL. It sounds like you had more of an issue with the GUI and the windows than you did with the actual exam content though, so that should be encouraging. From what you said, it sounds like you just may need some brushing up on some of the newer topics? With the older delivery format but the same technical content do you feel you would have made it? How did your score report come out? If you want to share more or chat more about it unicast me I'd be happy to do it. On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Michael Lipsey mich...@thelipseys.comwrote: Today was my day. It sucked, primarily because I didn’t pass. The OEQs are what you have come to know. The troubleshooting section is more or less how Wendell described it. I can’t really add much to it. The Lab configuration part – also, less of the same so to speak. I think that it was a good mix of stuff doable in about 6 hours. Problem is you only have 5.5 officially. Overall my thoughts are for the test I had; If I had known a couple of the newer techs as well as I know say OSPF or EIGRP, I would have finished most if not all the tasks. I don’t think I would have had much if any extra time from it though. There is probably ‘just’ enough time to do what they give you. The lab config part, well I think that in some respects it may be easier but still – 5.5 hours is just not much time. Task points were summarized more, instead of a few here and there for each task – it was points for the section. I don’t really know what this means as far as grading is concerned. The biggest problem I had was the new GUI interface. It’s interesting, has good points but for the most part I hate it compared to the v3 delivery. Let me repeat. I hate it. One of our proctors was Maurillio, I told him at lunch that I didn’t like it. I didn’t say I hated it though but the more I think about it the more I do. If we had two monitors things I think would be better. Still, the monitors they have are 24 freakin inches – you would think that would be big enough but it isn’t. The primary diagram takes most of it up. When you open the ‘questions’ pop up which describes what you are supposed to do it covers up the diagram. Both windows are too big to be seen on a 24” monitor at the same time. So you have to play with the windows the entire freaking lab so that you can refer to the documentation, the questions and your secure CRT sessions. Seriously, I spent more time moving windows around in the first 2 hours that I finally just drew out my diagrams and was done with it. If you’re going for your lab any time soon, prepare for the suck. There are 2 ways to solve this problem. Go back to the old delivery or give the candidates more monitor real estate. It is just ridiculous that the GUI is so problematic. The easiest fix I think is to provide 2 monitors (and a free attempt for me to make up for my significant frustration). -Mike ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Regards, Joe Astorino CCIE #24347 (RS) Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert Mailto: jastor...@ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat eFax: +1.810.454.0130 IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA (RS, Voice Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (RS, Voice, Security Service Provider) Certification Training with locations throughout the United States, Europe and Australia. Be sure to check out our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] My V4 Experience
Joe, On the topic of the new v4 material, do you know of or have a list of recommended reading for folks to get them up-to-speed for the new exam? I saw an old blog post from Jared S. with a really good list for the v3 blueprint, but don't recall seeing anything for the new stuff (I may be mistaken...happens all the time!). Just curious. Thanks. -EJ -Original Message- From: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Joe Astorino Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 2:17 PM To: Michael Lipsey Cc: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] My V4 Experience Hey Mike, Sorry to hear about the temporary setback buddy...you can bet we were all rooting for you back here at IPexpert and the OSL. It sounds like you had more of an issue with the GUI and the windows than you did with the actual exam content though, so that should be encouraging. From what you said, it sounds like you just may need some brushing up on some of the newer topics? With the older delivery format but the same technical content do you feel you would have made it? How did your score report come out? If you want to share more or chat more about it unicast me I'd be happy to do it. On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Michael Lipsey mich...@thelipseys.com wrote: Today was my day. It sucked, primarily because I didn't pass. The OEQs are what you have come to know. The troubleshooting section is more or less how Wendell described it. I can't really add much to it. The Lab configuration part - also, less of the same so to speak. I think that it was a good mix of stuff doable in about 6 hours. Problem is you only have 5.5 officially. Overall my thoughts are for the test I had; If I had known a couple of the newer techs as well as I know say OSPF or EIGRP, I would have finished most if not all the tasks. I don't think I would have had much if any extra time from it though. There is probably 'just' enough time to do what they give you. The lab config part, well I think that in some respects it may be easier but still - 5.5 hours is just not much time. Task points were summarized more, instead of a few here and there for each task - it was points for the section. I don't really know what this means as far as grading is concerned. The biggest problem I had was the new GUI interface. It's interesting, has good points but for the most part I hate it compared to the v3 delivery. Let me repeat. I hate it. One of our proctors was Maurillio, I told him at lunch that I didn't like it. I didn't say I hated it though but the more I think about it the more I do. If we had two monitors things I think would be better. Still, the monitors they have are 24 freakin inches - you would think that would be big enough but it isn't. The primary diagram takes most of it up. When you open the 'questions' pop up which describes what you are supposed to do it covers up the diagram. Both windows are too big to be seen on a 24 monitor at the same time. So you have to play with the windows the entire freaking lab so that you can refer to the documentation, the questions and your secure CRT sessions. Seriously, I spent more time moving windows around in the first 2 hours that I finally just drew out my diagrams and was done with it. If you're going for your lab any time soon, prepare for the suck. There are 2 ways to solve this problem. Go back to the old delivery or give the candidates more monitor real estate. It is just ridiculous that the GUI is so problematic. The easiest fix I think is to provide 2 monitors (and a free attempt for me to make up for my significant frustration). -Mike ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Regards, Joe Astorino CCIE #24347 (RS) Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert Mailto: jastor...@ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat eFax: +1.810.454.0130 IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA (RS, Voice Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (RS, Voice, Security Service Provider) Certification Training with locations throughout the United States, Europe and Australia. Be sure to check out our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
