Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
+1 Tom On Sunday, March 31, 2024 at 10:09:28 PM CDT, Ruifeng Zheng wrote: +1 On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:06 AM Haejoon Lee wrote: +1 On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: Hi all, I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect) JIRAPrototypeSPIP doc Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP [ ] +0 [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … Thanks. -- Ruifeng Zheng E-mail: zrfli...@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Yes On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 6:36 PM Femi Anthony wrote: > So, to clarify - the purpose of this package is to enable connectivity to > a remote Spark cluster without having to install any local JVM > dependencies, right ? > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Mar 31, 2024, at 10:07 PM, Haejoon Lee > wrote: > > > > +1 > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark >> Connect) >> >> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540> >> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053> >> SPIP doc >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing> >> >> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >> >> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >> >> Thanks. >> >
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
So, to clarify - the purpose of this package is to enable connectivity to a remote Spark cluster without having to install any local JVM dependencies, right ? Sent from my iPhoneOn Mar 31, 2024, at 10:07 PM, Haejoon Lee wrote:+1On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@apache.org> wrote:Hi all,I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect) JIRAPrototypeSPIP docPlease vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:[ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP[ ] +0[ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …Thanks.
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
+1 Regards, Mridul On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 11:26 PM Holden Karau wrote: > +1 > > Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau > Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): > https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9 <https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9> > YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau > > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 5:44 PM Xinrong Meng wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Thank you @Hyukjin Kwon >> >> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:19 AM Felix Cheung >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> -- >>> *From:* Denny Lee >>> *Sent:* Monday, April 1, 2024 10:06:14 AM >>> *To:* Hussein Awala >>> *Cc:* Chao Sun ; Hyukjin Kwon ; >>> Mridul Muralidharan ; dev >>> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect) >>> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 9:24 AM Hussein Awala wrote: >>> >>> +1(non-binding) I add to the difference will it make that it will also >>> simplify package maintenance and easily release a bug fix/new feature >>> without needing to wait for Pyspark to release. >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM Chao Sun wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon >>> wrote: >>> >>> Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple, >>> non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark >>> Connect initial discussion .. >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ? >>> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have >>> missed this … >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Mridul >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee >>> wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark >>> Connect) >>> >>> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540> >>> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053> >>> SPIP doc >>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing> >>> >>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >>> >>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >>> [ ] +0 >>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
+1 Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9 <https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9> YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 5:44 PM Xinrong Meng wrote: > +1 > > Thank you @Hyukjin Kwon > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:19 AM Felix Cheung > wrote: > >> +1 >> -- >> *From:* Denny Lee >> *Sent:* Monday, April 1, 2024 10:06:14 AM >> *To:* Hussein Awala >> *Cc:* Chao Sun ; Hyukjin Kwon ; >> Mridul Muralidharan ; dev >> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect) >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 9:24 AM Hussein Awala wrote: >> >> +1(non-binding) I add to the difference will it make that it will also >> simplify package maintenance and easily release a bug fix/new feature >> without needing to wait for Pyspark to release. >> >> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM Chao Sun wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon >> wrote: >> >> Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple, >> non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark >> Connect initial discussion .. >> >> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan >> wrote: >> >> >> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ? >> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have >> missed this … >> >> >> Regards, >> Mridul >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee >> wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon >> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark >> Connect) >> >> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540> >> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053> >> SPIP doc >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing> >> >> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >> >> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >> >> Thanks. >> >>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
+1 Thank you @Hyukjin Kwon On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:19 AM Felix Cheung wrote: > +1 > -- > *From:* Denny Lee > *Sent:* Monday, April 1, 2024 10:06:14 AM > *To:* Hussein Awala > *Cc:* Chao Sun ; Hyukjin Kwon ; > Mridul Muralidharan ; dev > *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect) > > +1 (non-binding) > > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 9:24 AM Hussein Awala wrote: > > +1(non-binding) I add to the difference will it make that it will also > simplify package maintenance and easily release a bug fix/new feature > without needing to wait for Pyspark to release. > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM Chao Sun wrote: > > +1 > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon > wrote: > > Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple, > non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark > Connect initial discussion .. > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan > wrote: > > > Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ? > I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have > missed this … > > > Regards, > Mridul > > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee > wrote: > > +1 > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark > Connect) > > JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540> > Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053> > SPIP doc > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing> > > Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: > > [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … > > Thanks. > >
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:19 AM Felix Cheung wrote: > +1 > -- > *From:* Denny Lee > *Sent:* Monday, April 1, 2024 10:06:14 AM > *To:* Hussein Awala > *Cc:* Chao Sun ; Hyukjin Kwon ; > Mridul Muralidharan ; dev > *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect) > > +1 (non-binding) > > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 9:24 AM Hussein Awala wrote: > > +1(non-binding) I add to the difference will it make that it will also > simplify package maintenance and easily release a bug fix/new feature > without needing to wait for Pyspark to release. > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM Chao Sun wrote: > > +1 > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon > wrote: > > Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple, > non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark > Connect initial discussion .. > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan > wrote: > > > Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ? > I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have > missed this … > > > Regards, > Mridul > > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee > wrote: > > +1 > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark > Connect) > > JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540> > Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053> > SPIP doc > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing> > > Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: > > [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … > > Thanks. > >
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
+1 From: Denny Lee Sent: Monday, April 1, 2024 10:06:14 AM To: Hussein Awala Cc: Chao Sun ; Hyukjin Kwon ; Mridul Muralidharan ; dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect) +1 (non-binding) On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 9:24 AM Hussein Awala mailto:huss...@awala.fr>> wrote: +1(non-binding) I add to the difference will it make that it will also simplify package maintenance and easily release a bug fix/new feature without needing to wait for Pyspark to release. On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM Chao Sun mailto:sunc...@apache.org>> wrote: +1 On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon mailto:gurwls...@apache.org>> wrote: Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple, non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark Connect initial discussion .. On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan mailto:mri...@gmail.com>> wrote: Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ? I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have missed this … Regards, Mridul On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee wrote: +1 On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon mailto:gurwls...@apache.org>> wrote: Hi all, I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect) JIRA<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540> Prototype<https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053> SPIP doc<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP [ ] +0 [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … Thanks.
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
+1 Chao Sun 于2024年4月1日周一 07:56写道: > +1 > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon > wrote: > >> Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple, >> non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark >> Connect initial discussion .. >> >> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ? >>> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have >>> missed this … >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Mridul >>> >> >>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI >>>>> (Spark Connect) >>>>> >>>>> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540> >>>>> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053> >>>>> SPIP doc >>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing> >>>>> >>>>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >>>>> >>>>> Thanks. >>>>> >>>>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 9:24 AM Hussein Awala wrote: > +1(non-binding) I add to the difference will it make that it will also > simplify package maintenance and easily release a bug fix/new feature > without needing to wait for Pyspark to release. > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM Chao Sun wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon >> wrote: >> >>> Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple, >>> non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark >>> Connect initial discussion .. >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ? >>>> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have >>>> missed this … >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Mridul >>>> >>> >>>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI >>>>>> (Spark Connect) >>>>>> >>>>>> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540> >>>>>> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053> >>>>>> SPIP doc >>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing> >>>>>> >>>>>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>> >>>>>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
+1 Hussein Awala 于2024年4月1日周一 08:07写道: > +1(non-binding) I add to the difference will it make that it will also > simplify package maintenance and easily release a bug fix/new feature > without needing to wait for Pyspark to release. > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM Chao Sun wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon >> wrote: >> >>> Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple, >>> non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark >>> Connect initial discussion .. >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ? >>>> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have >>>> missed this … >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Mridul >>>> >>> >>>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI >>>>>> (Spark Connect) >>>>>> >>>>>> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540> >>>>>> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053> >>>>>> SPIP doc >>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing> >>>>>> >>>>>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>> >>>>>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
+1(non-binding) I add to the difference will it make that it will also simplify package maintenance and easily release a bug fix/new feature without needing to wait for Pyspark to release. On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM Chao Sun wrote: > +1 > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon > wrote: > >> Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple, >> non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark >> Connect initial discussion .. >> >> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ? >>> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have >>> missed this … >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Mridul >>> >> >>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI >>>>> (Spark Connect) >>>>> >>>>> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540> >>>>> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053> >>>>> SPIP doc >>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing> >>>>> >>>>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >>>>> >>>>> Thanks. >>>>> >>>>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
+1 On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple, > non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark > Connect initial discussion .. > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan > wrote: > >> >> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ? >> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have >> missed this … >> >> >> Regards, >> Mridul >> > >> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark >>>> Connect) >>>> >>>> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540> >>>> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053> >>>> SPIP doc >>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing> >>>> >>>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >>>> >>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >>>> [ ] +0 >>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
+1(non-binding). Thank you, Hyukjin. Kent Yao Takuya UESHIN 于2024年4月1日周一 18:04写道: > > +1 > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 6:16 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark >> Connect) >> >> JIRA >> Prototype >> SPIP doc >> >> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >> >> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >> >> Thanks. > > > > -- > Takuya UESHIN > - To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
+1 Thanks Hyukjin. On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:52 PM Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > > +1 > > Thank you, Hyukjin. > > Dongjoon > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 19:07 Haejoon Lee > wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark >>> Connect) >>> >>> JIRA >>> Prototype >>> SPIP doc >>> >>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >>> >>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >>> [ ] +0 >>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >>> >>> Thanks. - To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
+1 On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 6:16 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark > Connect) > > JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540> > Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053> > SPIP doc > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing> > > Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: > > [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … > > Thanks. > -- Takuya UESHIN
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple, non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark Connect initial discussion .. On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan wrote: > > Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ? > I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have > missed this … > > > Regards, > Mridul > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark >>> Connect) >>> >>> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540> >>> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053> >>> SPIP doc >>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing> >>> >>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >>> >>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >>> [ ] +0 >>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ? I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have missed this … Regards, Mridul On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark >> Connect) >> >> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540> >> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053> >> SPIP doc >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing> >> >> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >> >> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >> >> Thanks. >> >
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
+1 On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 8:24 PM Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > +1 > > Thank you, Hyukjin. > > Dongjoon > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 19:07 Haejoon Lee > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark >>> Connect) >>> >>> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540> >>> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053> >>> SPIP doc >>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing> >>> >>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >>> >>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >>> [ ] +0 >>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
+1 Thank you, Hyukjin. Dongjoon On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 19:07 Haejoon Lee wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark >> Connect) >> >> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540> >> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053> >> SPIP doc >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing> >> >> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >> >> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >> >> Thanks. >> >
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
+1 On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:06 AM Haejoon Lee wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark >> Connect) >> >> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540> >> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053> >> SPIP doc >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing> >> >> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >> >> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >> >> Thanks. >> > -- Ruifeng Zheng E-mail: zrfli...@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
+1 On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark > Connect) > > JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540> > Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053> > SPIP doc > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing> > > Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: > > [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … > > Thanks. >
[VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
Hi all, I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect) JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053> SPIP doc <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP [ ] +0 [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … Thanks.