Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)

[Tom Graves]

 +1
Tom

On Sunday, March 31, 2024 at 10:09:28 PM CDT, Ruifeng Zheng 
 wrote:  
 
 +1

On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:06 AM Haejoon Lee 
 wrote:

+1

On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon  wrote:

Hi all,

I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark 
Connect) 
JIRAPrototypeSPIP doc

Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:

[ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
[ ] +0
[ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …

Thanks.



-- 
Ruifeng Zheng
E-mail: zrfli...@gmail.com
  

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)

[Hyukjin Kwon]

Yes

On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 6:36 PM Femi Anthony  wrote:

> So, to clarify - the purpose of this package is to enable connectivity to
> a remote Spark cluster without having to install any local JVM
> dependencies, right ?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 31, 2024, at 10:07 PM, Haejoon Lee
>  wrote:
>
> 
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon  wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
>> Connect)
>>
>> JIRA 
>> Prototype 
>> SPIP doc
>> 
>>
>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>
>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)

[Femi Anthony]

So, to clarify - the purpose of this package is to enable connectivity to a remote Spark cluster without having to install any local JVM dependencies, right ? Sent from my iPhoneOn Mar 31, 2024, at 10:07 PM, Haejoon Lee  wrote:+1On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon  wrote:Hi all,I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect) JIRAPrototypeSPIP docPlease vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:[ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP[ ] +0[ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …Thanks.

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)

[Mridul Muralidharan]

+1

Regards,
Mridul


On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 11:26 PM Holden Karau  wrote:

> +1
>
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
> Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.):
> https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9  <https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9>
> YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 5:44 PM Xinrong Meng  wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Thank you @Hyukjin Kwon 
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:19 AM Felix Cheung 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>> --
>>> *From:* Denny Lee 
>>> *Sent:* Monday, April 1, 2024 10:06:14 AM
>>> *To:* Hussein Awala 
>>> *Cc:* Chao Sun ; Hyukjin Kwon ;
>>> Mridul Muralidharan ; dev 
>>> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
>>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 9:24 AM Hussein Awala  wrote:
>>>
>>> +1(non-binding) I add to the difference will it make that it will also
>>> simplify package maintenance and easily release a bug fix/new feature
>>> without needing to wait for Pyspark to release.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM Chao Sun  wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple,
>>> non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark
>>> Connect initial discussion ..
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ?
>>> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have
>>> missed this …
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Mridul
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
>>> Connect)
>>>
>>> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540>
>>> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053>
>>> SPIP doc
>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing>
>>>
>>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)

[Holden Karau]

+1

Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.):
https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9  <https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9>
YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau


On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 5:44 PM Xinrong Meng  wrote:

> +1
>
> Thank you @Hyukjin Kwon 
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:19 AM Felix Cheung 
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>> --
>> *From:* Denny Lee 
>> *Sent:* Monday, April 1, 2024 10:06:14 AM
>> *To:* Hussein Awala 
>> *Cc:* Chao Sun ; Hyukjin Kwon ;
>> Mridul Muralidharan ; dev 
>> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
>>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 9:24 AM Hussein Awala  wrote:
>>
>> +1(non-binding) I add to the difference will it make that it will also
>> simplify package maintenance and easily release a bug fix/new feature
>> without needing to wait for Pyspark to release.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM Chao Sun  wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple,
>> non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark
>> Connect initial discussion ..
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan 
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ?
>> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have
>> missed this …
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mridul
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee
>>  wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
>> Connect)
>>
>> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540>
>> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053>
>> SPIP doc
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing>
>>
>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>
>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)

[Xinrong Meng]

+1

Thank you @Hyukjin Kwon 

On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:19 AM Felix Cheung 
wrote:

> +1
> --
> *From:* Denny Lee 
> *Sent:* Monday, April 1, 2024 10:06:14 AM
> *To:* Hussein Awala 
> *Cc:* Chao Sun ; Hyukjin Kwon ;
> Mridul Muralidharan ; dev 
> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 9:24 AM Hussein Awala  wrote:
>
> +1(non-binding) I add to the difference will it make that it will also
> simplify package maintenance and easily release a bug fix/new feature
> without needing to wait for Pyspark to release.
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM Chao Sun  wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon 
> wrote:
>
> Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple,
> non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark
> Connect initial discussion ..
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan 
> wrote:
>
>
> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ?
> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have
> missed this …
>
>
> Regards,
> Mridul
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee
>  wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon  wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
> Connect)
>
> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540>
> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053>
> SPIP doc
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing>
>
> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>
> Thanks.
>
>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)

[bo yang]

+1 (non-binding)

On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:19 AM Felix Cheung 
wrote:

> +1
> --
> *From:* Denny Lee 
> *Sent:* Monday, April 1, 2024 10:06:14 AM
> *To:* Hussein Awala 
> *Cc:* Chao Sun ; Hyukjin Kwon ;
> Mridul Muralidharan ; dev 
> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 9:24 AM Hussein Awala  wrote:
>
> +1(non-binding) I add to the difference will it make that it will also
> simplify package maintenance and easily release a bug fix/new feature
> without needing to wait for Pyspark to release.
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM Chao Sun  wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon 
> wrote:
>
> Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple,
> non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark
> Connect initial discussion ..
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan 
> wrote:
>
>
> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ?
> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have
> missed this …
>
>
> Regards,
> Mridul
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee
>  wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon  wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
> Connect)
>
> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540>
> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053>
> SPIP doc
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing>
>
> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>
> Thanks.
>
>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)

[Felix Cheung]

+1

From: Denny Lee 
Sent: Monday, April 1, 2024 10:06:14 AM
To: Hussein Awala 
Cc: Chao Sun ; Hyukjin Kwon ; Mridul 
Muralidharan ; dev 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)

+1 (non-binding)


On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 9:24 AM Hussein Awala 
mailto:huss...@awala.fr>> wrote:
+1(non-binding) I add to the difference will it make that it will also simplify 
package maintenance and easily release a bug fix/new feature without needing to 
wait for Pyspark to release.

On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM Chao Sun 
mailto:sunc...@apache.org>> wrote:
+1

On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon 
mailto:gurwls...@apache.org>> wrote:
Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple, non-invasive 
and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark Connect initial 
discussion ..

On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan 
mailto:mri...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ?
I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have missed this 
…


Regards,
Mridul

On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee 
 wrote:
+1

On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon 
mailto:gurwls...@apache.org>> wrote:
Hi all,

I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)

JIRA<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540>
Prototype<https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053>
SPIP 
doc<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing>

Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:

[ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
[ ] +0
[ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …

Thanks.

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)

[Yuanjian Li]

+1

Chao Sun  于2024年4月1日周一 07:56写道：

> +1
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon 
> wrote:
>
>> Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple,
>> non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark
>> Connect initial discussion ..
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ?
>>> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have
>>> missed this …
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Mridul
>>>
>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee
>>>  wrote:
>>>
 +1

 On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon 
 wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI
> (Spark Connect)
>
> JIRA 
> Prototype 
> SPIP doc
> 
>
> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>
> Thanks.
>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)

[Denny Lee]

+1 (non-binding)


On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 9:24 AM Hussein Awala  wrote:

> +1(non-binding) I add to the difference will it make that it will also
> simplify package maintenance and easily release a bug fix/new feature
> without needing to wait for Pyspark to release.
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM Chao Sun  wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple,
>>> non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark
>>> Connect initial discussion ..
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan 
>>> wrote:
>>>

 Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ?
 I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have
 missed this …


 Regards,
 Mridul

>>>
 On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee
  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI
>> (Spark Connect)
>>
>> JIRA 
>> Prototype 
>> SPIP doc
>> 
>>
>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>
>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)

[Xiao Li]

+1

Hussein Awala  于2024年4月1日周一 08:07写道：

> +1(non-binding) I add to the difference will it make that it will also
> simplify package maintenance and easily release a bug fix/new feature
> without needing to wait for Pyspark to release.
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM Chao Sun  wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple,
>>> non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark
>>> Connect initial discussion ..
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan 
>>> wrote:
>>>

 Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ?
 I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have
 missed this …


 Regards,
 Mridul

>>>
 On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee
  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI
>> (Spark Connect)
>>
>> JIRA 
>> Prototype 
>> SPIP doc
>> 
>>
>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>
>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)

[Hussein Awala]

+1(non-binding) I add to the difference will it make that it will also
simplify package maintenance and easily release a bug fix/new feature
without needing to wait for Pyspark to release.

On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM Chao Sun  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon 
> wrote:
>
>> Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple,
>> non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark
>> Connect initial discussion ..
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ?
>>> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have
>>> missed this …
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Mridul
>>>
>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee
>>>  wrote:
>>>
 +1

 On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon 
 wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI
> (Spark Connect)
>
> JIRA 
> Prototype 
> SPIP doc
> 
>
> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>
> Thanks.
>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)

[Chao Sun]

+1

On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon  wrote:

> Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple,
> non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark
> Connect initial discussion ..
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan 
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ?
>> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have
>> missed this …
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mridul
>>
>
>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee
>>  wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Hi all,

 I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
 Connect)

 JIRA 
 Prototype 
 SPIP doc
 

 Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:

 [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
 [ ] +0
 [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …

 Thanks.

>>>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)

[Kent Yao]

+1(non-binding). Thank you, Hyukjin.

Kent Yao

Takuya UESHIN  于2024年4月1日周一 18:04写道：
>
> +1
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 6:16 PM Hyukjin Kwon  wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark 
>> Connect)
>>
>> JIRA
>> Prototype
>> SPIP doc
>>
>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>
>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>
>> Thanks.
>
>
>
> --
> Takuya UESHIN
>

-
To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)

[L. C. Hsieh]

+1

Thanks Hyukjin.

On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:52 PM Dongjoon Hyun  wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Thank you, Hyukjin.
>
> Dongjoon
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 19:07 Haejoon Lee 
>  wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark 
>>> Connect)
>>>
>>> JIRA
>>> Prototype
>>> SPIP doc
>>>
>>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>>
>>> Thanks.

-
To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)

[Takuya UESHIN]

+1

On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 6:16 PM Hyukjin Kwon  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
> Connect)
>
> JIRA 
> Prototype 
> SPIP doc
> 
>
> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>
> Thanks.
>


-- 
Takuya UESHIN

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)

[Hyukjin Kwon]

Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple,
non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark
Connect initial discussion ..

On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan  wrote:

>
> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ?
> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have
> missed this …
>
>
> Regards,
> Mridul
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee
>  wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
>>> Connect)
>>>
>>> JIRA 
>>> Prototype 
>>> SPIP doc
>>> 
>>>
>>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)

[Mridul Muralidharan]

Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ?
I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have missed
this …


Regards,
Mridul

On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee
 wrote:

> +1
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon  wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
>> Connect)
>>
>> JIRA 
>> Prototype 
>> SPIP doc
>> 
>>
>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>
>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)

[Gengliang Wang]

+1

On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 8:24 PM Dongjoon Hyun 
wrote:

> +1
>
> Thank you, Hyukjin.
>
> Dongjoon
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 19:07 Haejoon Lee
>  wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
>>> Connect)
>>>
>>> JIRA 
>>> Prototype 
>>> SPIP doc
>>> 
>>>
>>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)

[Dongjoon Hyun]

+1

Thank you, Hyukjin.

Dongjoon

On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 19:07 Haejoon Lee
 wrote:

> +1
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon  wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
>> Connect)
>>
>> JIRA 
>> Prototype 
>> SPIP doc
>> 
>>
>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>
>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)

[Ruifeng Zheng]

+1

On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:06 AM Haejoon Lee
 wrote:

> +1
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon  wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
>> Connect)
>>
>> JIRA 
>> Prototype 
>> SPIP doc
>> 
>>
>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>>
>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>

-- 
Ruifeng Zheng
E-mail: zrfli...@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)

[Haejoon Lee]

+1

On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
> Connect)
>
> JIRA 
> Prototype 
> SPIP doc
> 
>
> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>
> Thanks.
>