Re: error updating Postfix
Giorgos Keramidas wrote: I can commit it _now_. I just haven't had a chance to build on a very recent stable/7 system (my 'build machine' is a Celeron and it has taken already 2 days to build RELENG_7). If someone else has a recent 7-STABLE system and can test the patch please do. The latest version of 7.X I have access to right now is ref7.freebsd.org with: FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE (REF7-AMD64) #6 r194101M: Sat Jun 13 09:51:42 UTC 2009 Those of you with slower machines, have you considered ccache? I cant imagine a 2 day build time, a k6-2 450 I still use takes about 8-9 hours without cache to build 6.stable, is that like a celeron 266 with like 64 megs of ram or sumthin? Brian ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
spamassassin info
fyi, for the first time in along time, sa-update actually fetched an update, it appears that either a new channel was created or my client just recognized it. Brian ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
fuzzyocr imagemagick and drug spam
years back i used FuzzyOcr to combat image spam, I stopped using it after some time went by. Over the last month or 2 I have seen a huge increase in drug spam, bed event type emails, so I went to install FuzzyOcr again. I have migrated to the newer perl 5.10, and this is the first problem I have seen. After the FuzzyOcr install failed, I went to the stage it broke, trying to install that individual stage. [r...@numail ~]# pkg_add -r !$ pkg_add -r ImageMagick Fetching ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/Latest/ImageMagick.tbz... Done. Fetching ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/All/perl-5.8.9_2.tbz... Done. pkg_add: package 'perl-5.8.9_2' conflicts with perl-5.10.0_2 pkg_add: please use pkg_delete first to remove conflicting package(s) or -f to force installation pkg_add: pkg_add of dependency 'perl-5.8.9_2' failed! Is there a better solution to the image spam problem now? Brian ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: fuzzyocr imagemagick and drug spam
RW wrote: On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:00:29 -0700 pkg_add -r ImageMagick Fetching [1]ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/Latest/ImageM agick.tbz... Done. Fetching [2]ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/All/perl-5.8. 9_2.tbz... Done. pkg_add: package 'perl-5.8.9_2' conflicts with perl-5.10.0_2 Install ImageMagick from ports instead. ___ [3]freebsd-po...@freebsd.org mailing list [4]http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [5]freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org I did that and it properly detected and used my newer perl. Brian References 1. ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/Latest/ImageMagick.tbz 2. ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/All/perl-5.8.9_2.tbz 3. mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org 4. http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports 5. mailto:freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Can I resume the perl upgrade?
RW wrote: On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:17:00 + Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com wrote: According to /usr/ports/UPDATING, if you want to upgrade to perl5.10, you do the following: Portupgrade users: 0) Fix pkgdb.db (for safety): pkgdb -Ff 1) Reinstall perl with new 5.10: portupgrade -o lang/perl5.10 -f perl-5.8.\* 2) Reinstall everything that depends on Perl: portupgrade -fr perl My machine got rebooted right in the middle of step 3. Is there a way to resume where I left off? Or do I just start over? Have portupgrade exclude the ports built after perl. portupgrade -fr perl -x '=perl' ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org I was just noticing that, step 3 reinstalls perl 5.10 again. Brian ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Chandler port .. ?
martinko wrote: Hallo list, I've been wondering if someone here is a user of Chandler (The Note-to-Self Organizer) which is quite a great and useful application: http://chandlerproject.org/ It is a multi platform, written in Python with a few dependencies. It is available for Windows, Mac OS X and Linux (.tar.gz and .deb). The problem is that according to porters to some other (than Ubuntu) Linux distributions it is not that easy task and would require certain skills. Therefore I wonder if and wish that someone skilled would try and port Chandler to FreeBSD. :-) Thanks and regards! Martin Did you see http://chandlerproject.org/Developers/BuildingChandlerDesktop Brian ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: HEADS UP multi processor compilations and packages
Pav Lucistnik wrote: Two days ago, I have checked in probably most requested feature of last few years. Ports framework now systematically supports building ports on multiple processing cores. It is achieved by passing -jX flag to make(1) running on vendor code. Of course not all ports handle this well, experimental run on pointyhat with this flag globally enabled turned up shy of 400 failures. Because of that, the feature was designed as a whitelist. Individual ports need to be enabled, and indeed, fellow developers took on and already started adding required declarations to popular ports like Firefox and others. On a related topic, I wonder what the cost would be of acquiring enough hardware so that the probability of actually getting a package with portupgrade -aP would go up substantially. I imagine the time required for the build servers to build packages with the above mod would go down substantially. Brian ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
