RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box

2004-10-21 Thread Rick Rambo
Since this is our first in-house email server I decided to try and simplify
my life by using the AV solution from Ipswitch, also we run Symantec
Enterprise on the rest of our network and have been pleased with it.

Server is more pricy than WS, but since there are no Microsoft protocols
running on the server (as I read the EULA) you don't need to licence all of
those pesky connection CAL's.  Which makes the price more reasonable.  (The
CAL issue is why we have Slackware/SAMBA file servers internally.) When we
have a better comfort level with the server operation we will probably look
at other options.

I'm always open to better ideas

.rick..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 12:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box

The statement I was replying to was that Windows workstation was required
for the AV product and that was my bad I reversed workstation and server
when I read it. But you could have stayed with workstation by using declude
virus if being on workstation was that important and probably saved some
money.

So you still could have chosen a different product for AV scanning.


Kevin Bilbee


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rick Rambo
 Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 6:20 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box


 Unless we read the specs wrong for the Imail antivirus, in that case 
 my bad...
 snip

 IMail Anti-Virus Premium Edition

 * Windows 2000 Server or Windows 2003 Server
 * The IMail Anti-Virus server and LiveUpdate require Internet 
 Explorer
 4.71.1712.6 or later be installed
 * Pentium III 500 Mhz or higher
 * 256-512MB of RAM
 * 8+ GB of hard disk space
 * 1 or more network cards
 * 1 or more processors (depending on the mail traffic rates)

 /snip
 .rick..

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
 Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 3:15 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box

 I bet no one out ther was expecing that answer!

 what does you AV have to do with choosing the proper OS. Correct me if 
 I am wrong but there is AV software available for all Windows 
 versions.

 If your AV insists on workstation hten chang AV products. Use the 
 proper tool for the job. I caught my 6 year old using a flat head 
 screw driver the other day on a phillips head screw. He got it to work 
 but messed up the screw in the process.



 Kevin Bilbee

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rick Rambo
  Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:03 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box
 
 
  The only reason we chose server over workstation was our antivirus 
  insisted upon it.
 
  .rick..
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bud 
  Durland
  Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 2:08 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box
 
  John Carter wrote:
 
  I'm looking to upgrade our Imail box (Dell Optiplex, 600mhz, 256MB, 
  Win2000). We get about 500K messages a month, so a solid desktop 
  will do
  us.
  (Looking at Dell 3.2GHz, 1GB)  Question: Since I only run Imail and 
  Declude on the box, are there any issues that make XP or Win2000 a 
  better operating system?  (We have campus licenses for both, so 
  cost and availability are not
  problems.)
  
  
 
  Unless they've changed something,  XP is a workstation OS, and as 
  such is limited to 10 client connection at a time.  I don't know it 
  that only applies to Windows network connections, or incoming 
  connections for any service.
 
  If the debate is Windows Server 2003 vs. Windows server 2000, I'm 
  not sure there's a big different either way, though I'd probably 
  install on WinServer
  2003 if given the choice.
 
 
  --
  
  He made us believe a man could fly
  Christopher Reeve, 1952-2004
  -
  Bud Durland, CNE   Mold-Rite Plastics
  Network Administrator   http://www.mrpcap.com
  
  -
 
  ---
  [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus / Sophos AV]
 
 
  To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
  List Archive:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
  Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
 
 
 
 
  To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
  List Archive:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
  Knowledge Base/FAQ: http

RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box

2004-10-21 Thread Len Conrad

Server is more pricy than WS, but since there are no Microsoft protocols
running on the server
MS tcp/ip is an MS protocol
Len
_
http://IMGate.MEIway.com : free anti-spam gateway, runs on 1000's of sites
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box

2004-10-20 Thread John Carter
Thanks all.  I've run Imail on either NT or 2000 Workstation for nearly
seven years.  Never understood that a server OS had any real performance
advantage. Will rethink that now.

John

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Schaible
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 5:49 PM
To: Devaprasad Kantharaj
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box

Hi,

Prasad brings it to the point. Use Windows 2003 Server, at least double the
memory and your IMail
server will be happy for the rest of its live.





Am Mittwoch, 20. Oktober 2004 um 00:05 schrieben Sie:

 Hey John,

 If you are speaking of using a desktop operating system for your IMail
box, I HIGHLY
 recommend against it. If you are using a desktop OS now, that is probably
why your
 performance might be degrading.

 You could actually take your existing box, upgrade the RAM (and hard drive
if
 needed), upgrade the OS to a server OS (2000 or 2003) and see a
significant improvement
 in performance.

 The difference between workstation and server OS makes a BIG difference.

 Prasad

 Devaprasad Kantharaj
 MIS Director, TVCCA

 -- Original Message --
 From: John Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date:  Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:28:37 -0500

 I'm looking to upgrade our Imail box (Dell Optiplex, 600mhz, 256MB,
 Win2000). We get about 500K messages a month, so a solid desktop will do
us.
 (Looking at Dell 3.2GHz, 1GB)  Question: Since I only run Imail and
Declude
 on the box, are there any issues that make XP or Win2000 a better
operating
 system?  (We have campus licenses for both, so cost and availability are
not
 problems.)

 Thanks,
 John


 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

 

 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/



-- 
 
Mit freundlichen GrĂ¼ssen


Merlin Consulting
Martin Schaible
Bahnhofstrasse 27
CH-8702 Zollikon

Phone:   +41 1 391 30 00
Fax: +41 1 391 32 49

Mail:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://www.merlinconsulting.ch
Support: http://support.merlinconsulting.ch

GPS: N47 20.235 E8 34.226

News - Neue Produkte:

.:. Kiwi Syslog Monitor
.:. Paessler GmbH
.:. Sawmill Loganalyzer





To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box

2004-10-20 Thread Rick Rambo
Unless we read the specs wrong for the Imail antivirus, in that case my
bad...
snip

IMail Anti-Virus Premium Edition

* Windows 2000 Server or Windows 2003 Server
* The IMail Anti-Virus server and LiveUpdate require Internet Explorer
4.71.1712.6 or later be installed
* Pentium III 500 Mhz or higher
* 256-512MB of RAM
* 8+ GB of hard disk space
* 1 or more network cards
* 1 or more processors (depending on the mail traffic rates)

/snip
.rick.. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 3:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box

I bet no one out ther was expecing that answer!

what does you AV have to do with choosing the proper OS. Correct me if I am
wrong but there is AV software available for all Windows versions.

If your AV insists on workstation hten chang AV products. Use the proper
tool for the job. I caught my 6 year old using a flat head screw driver the
other day on a phillips head screw. He got it to work but messed up the
screw in the process.



Kevin Bilbee

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rick Rambo
 Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:03 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box


 The only reason we chose server over workstation was our antivirus 
 insisted upon it.

 .rick..
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bud Durland
 Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 2:08 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box

 John Carter wrote:

 I'm looking to upgrade our Imail box (Dell Optiplex, 600mhz, 256MB, 
 Win2000). We get about 500K messages a month, so a solid desktop will 
 do
 us.
 (Looking at Dell 3.2GHz, 1GB)  Question: Since I only run Imail and 
 Declude on the box, are there any issues that make XP or Win2000 a 
 better operating system?  (We have campus licenses for both, so cost 
 and availability are not
 problems.)
 
 

 Unless they've changed something,  XP is a workstation OS, and as such 
 is limited to 10 client connection at a time.  I don't know it that 
 only applies to Windows network connections, or incoming connections 
 for any service.

 If the debate is Windows Server 2003 vs. Windows server 2000, I'm not 
 sure there's a big different either way, though I'd probably install 
 on WinServer
 2003 if given the choice.


 --
 
 He made us believe a man could fly
 Christopher Reeve, 1952-2004
 -
 Bud Durland, CNE   Mold-Rite Plastics
 Network Administrator   http://www.mrpcap.com
 -

 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus / Sophos AV]


 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive: 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/




 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive: 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/



To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/




To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box

2004-10-20 Thread Laura Bhandari

RE: If you are speaking of using a desktop operating system for your IMail box, I 
HIGHLY recommend against it. If you are using a desktop OS now, that is probably why 
your performance might be degrading.

I found the opposite to be true - I used to run IMail on Win2K Server and switched to 
Win2K Pro. I think it runs better on Pro - certainly fewer resources are being used by 
the OS - leaving those resources free to be used by IMail. But maybe that's just me - 
we are a low volume situation.

~Laura


 




 


 
   

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box

2004-10-20 Thread Kevin Bilbee
The statement I was replying to was that Windows workstation was required
for the AV product and that was my bad I reversed workstation and server
when I read it. But you could have stayed with workstation by using declude
virus if being on workstation was that important and probably saved some
money.

So you still could have chosen a different product for AV scanning.


Kevin Bilbee


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rick Rambo
 Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 6:20 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box


 Unless we read the specs wrong for the Imail antivirus, in that case my
 bad...
 snip

 IMail Anti-Virus Premium Edition

 * Windows 2000 Server or Windows 2003 Server
 * The IMail Anti-Virus server and LiveUpdate require Internet Explorer
 4.71.1712.6 or later be installed
 * Pentium III 500 Mhz or higher
 * 256-512MB of RAM
 * 8+ GB of hard disk space
 * 1 or more network cards
 * 1 or more processors (depending on the mail traffic rates)

 /snip
 .rick..

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
 Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 3:15 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box

 I bet no one out ther was expecing that answer!

 what does you AV have to do with choosing the proper OS. Correct
 me if I am
 wrong but there is AV software available for all Windows versions.

 If your AV insists on workstation hten chang AV products. Use the proper
 tool for the job. I caught my 6 year old using a flat head screw
 driver the
 other day on a phillips head screw. He got it to work but messed up the
 screw in the process.



 Kevin Bilbee

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rick Rambo
  Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:03 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box
 
 
  The only reason we chose server over workstation was our antivirus
  insisted upon it.
 
  .rick..
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bud Durland
  Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 2:08 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box
 
  John Carter wrote:
 
  I'm looking to upgrade our Imail box (Dell Optiplex, 600mhz, 256MB,
  Win2000). We get about 500K messages a month, so a solid desktop will
  do
  us.
  (Looking at Dell 3.2GHz, 1GB)  Question: Since I only run Imail and
  Declude on the box, are there any issues that make XP or Win2000 a
  better operating system?  (We have campus licenses for both, so cost
  and availability are not
  problems.)
  
  
 
  Unless they've changed something,  XP is a workstation OS, and as such
  is limited to 10 client connection at a time.  I don't know it that
  only applies to Windows network connections, or incoming connections
  for any service.
 
  If the debate is Windows Server 2003 vs. Windows server 2000, I'm not
  sure there's a big different either way, though I'd probably install
  on WinServer
  2003 if given the choice.
 
 
  --
  
  He made us believe a man could fly
  Christopher Reeve, 1952-2004
  -
  Bud Durland, CNE   Mold-Rite Plastics
  Network Administrator   http://www.mrpcap.com
  -
 
  ---
  [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus / Sophos AV]
 
 
  To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
  List Archive:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
  Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
 
 
 
 
  To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
  List Archive:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
  Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
 


 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/




 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/



To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


Re: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box

2004-10-20 Thread Eric Shanbrom [Ipswitch]
Even with the premium AV product (which requires a server platform to run
on) you can point the AV processing to a machine running it and off load
this processing..Just keep in mind network latency

Eric S
- Original Message - 
From: Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 1:44 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box


 The statement I was replying to was that Windows workstation was required
 for the AV product and that was my bad I reversed workstation and server
 when I read it. But you could have stayed with workstation by using
declude
 virus if being on workstation was that important and probably saved some
 money.

 So you still could have chosen a different product for AV scanning.


 Kevin Bilbee


  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rick Rambo
  Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 6:20 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box
 
 
  Unless we read the specs wrong for the Imail antivirus, in that case my
  bad...
  snip
 
  IMail Anti-Virus Premium Edition
 
  * Windows 2000 Server or Windows 2003 Server
  * The IMail Anti-Virus server and LiveUpdate require Internet
Explorer
  4.71.1712.6 or later be installed
  * Pentium III 500 Mhz or higher
  * 256-512MB of RAM
  * 8+ GB of hard disk space
  * 1 or more network cards
  * 1 or more processors (depending on the mail traffic rates)
 
  /snip
  .rick..
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
  Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 3:15 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box
 
  I bet no one out ther was expecing that answer!
 
  what does you AV have to do with choosing the proper OS. Correct
  me if I am
  wrong but there is AV software available for all Windows versions.
 
  If your AV insists on workstation hten chang AV products. Use the proper
  tool for the job. I caught my 6 year old using a flat head screw
  driver the
  other day on a phillips head screw. He got it to work but messed up the
  screw in the process.
 
 
 
  Kevin Bilbee
 
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rick Rambo
   Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:03 PM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box
  
  
   The only reason we chose server over workstation was our antivirus
   insisted upon it.
  
   .rick..
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bud Durland
   Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 2:08 PM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box
  
   John Carter wrote:
  
   I'm looking to upgrade our Imail box (Dell Optiplex, 600mhz, 256MB,
   Win2000). We get about 500K messages a month, so a solid desktop will
   do
   us.
   (Looking at Dell 3.2GHz, 1GB)  Question: Since I only run Imail and
   Declude on the box, are there any issues that make XP or Win2000 a
   better operating system?  (We have campus licenses for both, so cost
   and availability are not
   problems.)
   
   
  
   Unless they've changed something,  XP is a workstation OS, and as such
   is limited to 10 client connection at a time.  I don't know it that
   only applies to Windows network connections, or incoming connections
   for any service.
  
   If the debate is Windows Server 2003 vs. Windows server 2000, I'm not
   sure there's a big different either way, though I'd probably install
   on WinServer
   2003 if given the choice.
  
  
   --
   
   He made us believe a man could fly
   Christopher Reeve, 1952-2004
   -
   Bud Durland, CNE   Mold-Rite Plastics
   Network Administrator   http://www.mrpcap.com
   -
  
   ---
   [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus / Sophos AV]
  
  
   To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
   List Archive:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
   Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
  
  
  
  
   To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
   List Archive:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
   Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
  
 
 
  To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
  List Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
  Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
 
 
 
 
  To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
  List Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum

Re: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box

2004-10-19 Thread Bud Durland
John Carter wrote:
I'm looking to upgrade our Imail box (Dell Optiplex, 600mhz, 256MB,
Win2000). We get about 500K messages a month, so a solid desktop will do us.
(Looking at Dell 3.2GHz, 1GB)  Question: Since I only run Imail and Declude
on the box, are there any issues that make XP or Win2000 a better operating
system?  (We have campus licenses for both, so cost and availability are not
problems.)
 

Unless they've changed something,  XP is a workstation OS, and as such 
is limited to 10 client connection at a time.  I don't know it that only 
applies to Windows network connections, or incoming connections for any 
service.

If the debate is Windows Server 2003 vs. Windows server 2000, I'm not 
sure there's a big different either way, though I'd probably install on 
WinServer 2003 if given the choice.

--

He made us believe a man could fly
Christopher Reeve, 1952-2004
-
Bud Durland, CNE   Mold-Rite Plastics
Network Administrator   http://www.mrpcap.com
-
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus / Sophos AV]
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box

2004-10-19 Thread Rick Rambo
The only reason we chose server over workstation was our antivirus insisted
upon it. 

.rick..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bud Durland
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 2:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box

John Carter wrote:

I'm looking to upgrade our Imail box (Dell Optiplex, 600mhz, 256MB, 
Win2000). We get about 500K messages a month, so a solid desktop will do
us.
(Looking at Dell 3.2GHz, 1GB)  Question: Since I only run Imail and 
Declude on the box, are there any issues that make XP or Win2000 a 
better operating system?  (We have campus licenses for both, so cost 
and availability are not
problems.)
  


Unless they've changed something,  XP is a workstation OS, and as such is
limited to 10 client connection at a time.  I don't know it that only
applies to Windows network connections, or incoming connections for any
service.

If the debate is Windows Server 2003 vs. Windows server 2000, I'm not sure
there's a big different either way, though I'd probably install on WinServer
2003 if given the choice.


--

He made us believe a man could fly
Christopher Reeve, 1952-2004
-
Bud Durland, CNE   Mold-Rite Plastics
Network Administrator   http://www.mrpcap.com
-

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus / Sophos AV]


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/




To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box

2004-10-19 Thread Dan Horne
I have Imail installed on a Dell server with Win2000SRV for Primary.  Same
hardware but WinXP Pro (not my idea) for the backup server.  The main
server, on the same hardware, is almost twice as fast at
Declude/Fprot/Imail.  Neither box runs anything else continually (the backup
has a program that the boss uses that won't work on a server OS, but he only
uses it once a month for about an hour).

I don't have hard numbers to support it, but the difference is very obvious.



To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box

2004-10-19 Thread Kevin Bilbee
I bet no one out ther was expecing that answer!

what does you AV have to do with choosing the proper OS. Correct me if I am
wrong but there is AV software available for all Windows versions.

If your AV insists on workstation hten chang AV products. Use the proper
tool for the job. I caught my 6 year old using a flat head screw driver the
other day on a phillips head screw. He got it to work but messed up the
screw in the process.



Kevin Bilbee

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rick Rambo
 Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:03 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box


 The only reason we chose server over workstation was our
 antivirus insisted
 upon it.

 .rick..
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bud Durland
 Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 2:08 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box

 John Carter wrote:

 I'm looking to upgrade our Imail box (Dell Optiplex, 600mhz, 256MB,
 Win2000). We get about 500K messages a month, so a solid desktop will do
 us.
 (Looking at Dell 3.2GHz, 1GB)  Question: Since I only run Imail and
 Declude on the box, are there any issues that make XP or Win2000 a
 better operating system?  (We have campus licenses for both, so cost
 and availability are not
 problems.)
 
 

 Unless they've changed something,  XP is a workstation OS, and as such is
 limited to 10 client connection at a time.  I don't know it that only
 applies to Windows network connections, or incoming connections for any
 service.

 If the debate is Windows Server 2003 vs. Windows server 2000, I'm not sure
 there's a big different either way, though I'd probably install
 on WinServer
 2003 if given the choice.


 --
 
 He made us believe a man could fly
 Christopher Reeve, 1952-2004
 -
 Bud Durland, CNE   Mold-Rite Plastics
 Network Administrator   http://www.mrpcap.com
 -

 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus / Sophos AV]


 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/




 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/



To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


Re: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box

2004-10-19 Thread Devaprasad Kantharaj
Hey John,

If you are speaking of using a desktop operating system for your IMail box, I HIGHLY 
recommend against it. If you are using a desktop OS now, that is probably why your 
performance might be degrading.

You could actually take your existing box, upgrade the RAM (and hard drive if needed), 
upgrade the OS to a server OS (2000 or 2003) and see a significant improvement in 
performance.

The difference between workstation and server OS makes a BIG difference.

Prasad

Devaprasad Kantharaj
MIS Director, TVCCA

-- Original Message --
From: John Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:  Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:28:37 -0500

I'm looking to upgrade our Imail box (Dell Optiplex, 600mhz, 256MB,
Win2000). We get about 500K messages a month, so a solid desktop will do us.
(Looking at Dell 3.2GHz, 1GB)  Question: Since I only run Imail and Declude
on the box, are there any issues that make XP or Win2000 a better operating
system?  (We have campus licenses for both, so cost and availability are not
problems.)

Thanks,
John


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

 

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


Re: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box

2004-10-19 Thread Martin Schaible
Hi,

Prasad brings it to the point. Use Windows 2003 Server, at least double the memory and 
your IMail
server will be happy for the rest of its live.





Am Mittwoch, 20. Oktober 2004 um 00:05 schrieben Sie:

 Hey John,

 If you are speaking of using a desktop operating system for your IMail box, I HIGHLY
 recommend against it. If you are using a desktop OS now, that is probably why your
 performance might be degrading.

 You could actually take your existing box, upgrade the RAM (and hard drive if
 needed), upgrade the OS to a server OS (2000 or 2003) and see a significant 
 improvement
 in performance.

 The difference between workstation and server OS makes a BIG difference.

 Prasad

 Devaprasad Kantharaj
 MIS Director, TVCCA

 -- Original Message --
 From: John Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date:  Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:28:37 -0500

 I'm looking to upgrade our Imail box (Dell Optiplex, 600mhz, 256MB,
 Win2000). We get about 500K messages a month, so a solid desktop will do us.
 (Looking at Dell 3.2GHz, 1GB)  Question: Since I only run Imail and Declude
 on the box, are there any issues that make XP or Win2000 a better operating
 system?  (We have campus licenses for both, so cost and availability are not
 problems.)

 Thanks,
 John


 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

 

 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/



-- 
 
Mit freundlichen GrĂ¼ssen


Merlin Consulting
Martin Schaible
Bahnhofstrasse 27
CH-8702 Zollikon

Phone:   +41 1 391 30 00
Fax: +41 1 391 32 49

Mail:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://www.merlinconsulting.ch
Support: http://support.merlinconsulting.ch

GPS: N47 20.235 E8 34.226

News - Neue Produkte:

.:. Kiwi Syslog Monitor
.:. Paessler GmbH
.:. Sawmill Loganalyzer





To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/