Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] BBC live does not work through DAC

2012-08-09 Thread dood

changed settings in LMS for live stream to WMA and all fine now. Thanks.



dood's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=56698
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=95994

___
Touch mailing list
Touch@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch


[SlimDevices: Touch] How to make Logitech Media Server rescan

2012-08-09 Thread pterpm

Hi guys, i'm newbie on this forum, I have Synology DS 1812+ and
installed package Logitech Media Server from synology , but the problem
is it can not rescan when adding the new music files
Can anyone know how to make it rescan 
Please, help 
Thank you



pterpm's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=56844
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96002

___
Touch mailing list
Touch@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch


Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Who could tell me the reason that the SBT doesn't support the East Asian Scripts?

2012-08-09 Thread wildgoose

I am curious about the difference between using Font Replacer and the
Google android fonts workaround to display Chinese characters.

I've been using the Google Android fonts method. The font looks nice and
everything, but I've find upgrading squeezebox touch to be problematic.
Occasionally, after the upgrade, the screen would come up blank, unless
I do a factory default. This wipes out the Android font and I have to
find the instructions and re-do it again.

Does Font Replacer works the same way as the android font method? It's
info seems to indicate it won't replace the UI font, so I am curious how
exactly it works.

Thanks.



wildgoose's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23501
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=95811

___
Touch mailing list
Touch@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch


Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Who could tell me the reason that the SBT doesn't support the East Asian Scripts?

2012-08-09 Thread ply3908

wildgoose wrote: 
 I am curious about the difference between using Font Replacer and the
 Google android fonts workaround to display Chinese characters.
 
 I've been using the Google Android fonts method. The font looks nice and
 everything, but I've find upgrading squeezebox touch to be problematic.
 Occasionally, after the upgrade, the screen would come up blank, unless
 I do a factory default. This wipes out the Android font and I have to
 find the instructions and re-do it again.
 
 Does Font Replacer works the same way as the android font method? It's
 info seems to indicate it won't replace the UI font, so I am curious how
 exactly it works.
 
 Thanks.

The fonts from Font Replacer  look like the Google android fonts and
it just replacing the fonts with the CJK fonts.  You can un-install the
Font Replacer if you don't like it.



ply3908's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=38634
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=95811

___
Touch mailing list
Touch@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch


[SlimDevices: Touch] Seeking SBT Hard- Software Architecture Description

2012-08-09 Thread jeromeharris

I am a new owner of a Squeezebox Touch. I've been happily using it for
listening to Internet radio streams, and I've been reading various
posts on this forum seeking information that will help me assemble a
SBT-based setup that meets my other listening interests and priorities.


Has anyone posted a function-oriented description of the various
hardware and software elements of the SBT--sort of a system
architecture portrait? I've been gleaning some of that type of info
from forum posts, but I don't have a full and accurate understanding of
how the software (Squeezebox Server, Logitech Media Server,
TinySB)--whether in the SBT or sitting elsewhere--works with the SBT
and ancillary gear (while having been a computer user since DOS days,
I'm rather ignorant about client/server stuff; obviously the SBT is to
some degree a specialized server device). Such understanding seems
essential for making decisions about what I would need for what I want a
system to do.

My interests and priorities (beyond accessing streams):
I intend to move the data from all of my CDs (numbering over 2000, and
slowly growing) onto a hard drive, along with some number of purchased
files. I hate dropouts while listening; since I'm not yet sure that the
WiFi in my main listening room is stable enough to avoid them, I have to
decide whether my library drive will be plugged directly into my SBT, or
into my WiFi router (currently an Apple Airport Extreme). 

Given the long process of ripping and tagging that many discs, I want to
know that a drive I buy for my music library will actually work--I'd
hate to buy one only to have to spend time and effort returning it. I've
tried plugging three USB hard drives into my SBT, with and without
external power supplies, with and without a powered hub; one drive has
never been recognized (nor have any USB thumb drives I've tried). At
some point I'll swap enclosures with a drive that is recognized, but my
time for such experimenting is limited--I'm into all of this more for
the music than for the hobbyist adventure). I'd like to determine in
advance whether a particular USB or NAS hard drive will work.

Since I certainly will be adding music to my library, convenient system
or network access to an optical drive, ripping/tagging software and WiFi
makes sense, right? Given that, along with my concerns about finding a
good library hard drive, I want to assess the pluses and minuses of
using the SBT with a Vortexbox Appliance, SqueezePlug or fit-PC.

Once I get this system up and running well, I intend to check out the
sound of high bit depth/high sample rate files, and also consider
measures for improving the general sound of the system (external DAC;
improved power supply), funds permitting. For now, the sound quality of
the SBT is more than sufficient for me.

I'm sure I will have further questions for the forum members as I
continue along this path, but for now I'll ask: would someone please
point me to--or post--a system architecture description of the SBT
software and hardware?



jeromeharris's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=56799
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96003

___
Touch mailing list
Touch@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch


Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] How to improve Touch sound?

2012-08-09 Thread guidof

dood wrote: 
 If you are happy with the sound of your set up with a different source,
 eg CD player, then the problem is not your amp or speakers. In that case
 an external DAC will make the most difference, certainly more than power
 suppiles, cables etc.

Possibly. However, I have three Touches. One outputs to an external DAC.
Two use the Touch internal DAC. If anything, the internal DAC tends to
tame both frequency extremes. Since the OP complains of sound that is
too bright and 'digital', it is unlikely that an external DAC will help.
it's also quite doubtful that a different power supply will help, for
the same reason.

But we all listen for different clues and to different kinds of music,
so it's certainly worth a try if the OP can borrow a good DAC. Nothing
like listening with one's own ears!

Guido F.



guidof's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=40448
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=95998

___
Touch mailing list
Touch@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch


Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] How to improve Touch sound?

2012-08-09 Thread guidof

Dazed and Confused wrote: 
 Thanks for your advice so far.
 
 The rest of my system (amp  speakers) is as follows: Luxman L-505u
 Integrated Amplifier  Audiosmile Kensai speakers. 
 
 I suppose all electronics need a 'burn in' time so I'll leave it playing
 for a while and see if the digital glare diminishes.
 
 I do keep reading that the power supply is best ditched and replaced by
 something 'better', but the most of these replacements seem to exceed
 the price of the Touch itself!

Your Luxman is very probably not the culprit. I'm not familiar with your
speakers, but you may try playing with their placement and different
toe-in angles. There is nothing that needs burn-in time in the Touch.
But it's still a good idea to listen to a variety of music over a few
weeks so that you may fully familiarize yourself with the sound and
decide whether or not it meets your expectations.

Happy listening!

Guido F.



guidof's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=40448
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=95998

___
Touch mailing list
Touch@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch


Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Seeking SBT Hard- Software Architecture Description

2012-08-09 Thread garym

To get you started read a bunch of this material. Somewhat outdated with
terms (squeezenetwork is now my squeezebox.com and squeezecenter is
LMS). But still very useful. 

http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/Main_Page

Also, much more active group at

Forums.slimdevices.com

I'll post more, but for now id say avoid tinyLMS built into touch.
Otherwise, great system. I have about 70,000 FLAC files and play them
with no issues, controlling my whole house system from laptop, iPhone,
or iPad.



garym's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17325
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96003

___
Touch mailing list
Touch@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch


Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Seeking SBT Hard- Software Architecture Description

2012-08-09 Thread aubuti

Welcome to the Squeezebox (SB) world. You've got a whole lot of
questions in your first post, mixed in with some correct observations
and some apparent misperceptions. I don't think I can address all of
them, but I'll try to get to the key ones.

First, just because the wifi in your listening room is iffy doesn't mean
you have to go with the Touch's built-in server (I'll call it TinyLMS)
and a directly-attached USB drive. The TinyLMS+USB drive approach works
for some and fails for others, but overall it has to be the most
unreliable aspect of the whole SB system. Is there a way to run ethernet
(cat5e or cat6) cable to your listening room? If not, what about
homeplug adapters, which carry wired network traffic over your home's
electrical wiring? Or adding a wifi access point in or near the
listening room?  In the end, improving the connectivity of your
listening room to avoid dropouts is likely to be more satisfying than
using TinyLMS plus an external drive.

Second, as for system architecture, you correctly surmise that it's a
client/server system. However, the Touch is primarily a client, and its
server function is a distant second. The Touch, like all Squeezebox
models, has to be connected to a server. That server could be LMS
running on a computer (or on a NAS, or TinyLMS on an SB Touch) on your
local network, or it could be mysqueezebox.com, which is the server in
the cloud.  For playing back your ripped CDs, you usually need to have
a local LMS/TinyLMS running. I say usually because there is a paid
subscription service on mysqueezebox.com called MP3Tunes that allows you
to upload your tracks (MP3 versions only) to an online storage site, and
then play them back from there.  But usually mysqueezebox.com (or
mysb.com for lazy typists like me) is used for streaming from the
internet: internet radio and services such as Pandora, Slacker,
Rhapsody, Spotify, MOG, Last.fm, and others.

Btw, it probably also helps to know that slimserver, SqueezeCenter (SC),
Squeezebox Server (SBS), and Logitech Media Server (LMS) are all
different names for the same thing, namely the server software that runs
on a pc, NAS, or Touch (in a stripped-down version on the Touch).
Apparently when they get bored at Logitech they rename things fairly
indiscriminately. 

As for the pluses and minuses of Vortexbox Appliance, squeezeplug, or
FitPC, my advice is that there is no hurry. Presumably you have a
computer at present. Can you run LMS on that? If so, I would get started
with that while you sort out issues such as the wifi in your listening
room and ripping your CDs. It's always easy to upgrade/change your LMS
server hardware later. My particular route started from an old surplus
Dell desktop running Ubuntu to a hacked LinkStation NAS to a different
hacked LinkStation NAS to my current headless Atom-based nettop that I
assembled using largely the same hardware as a Vortexbox Appliance.  And
I still do all my ripping on my Windows laptop.

Hope this helps at least a little.



aubuti's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2074
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96003

___
Touch mailing list
Touch@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch


Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] How to improve Touch sound?

2012-08-09 Thread aubuti

guidof wrote: 
 There is nothing that needs burn-in time in the Touch. But it's still a
 good idea to listen to a variety of music over a few weeks so that you
 may fully familiarize yourself with the sound and decide whether or not
 it meets your expectations.
Agreed. My earlier suggestion about giving the Touch a few days'
listening was entirely about giving the device a fair hearing and not
at all about burn-in.



aubuti's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2074
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=95998

___
Touch mailing list
Touch@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch


Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Seeking SBT Hard- Software Architecture Description

2012-08-09 Thread JohnSwenson

jeromeharris wrote: 
 Has anyone posted a function-oriented description of the various
 hardware and software elements of the SBT--sort of a system
 architecture portrait?

You asked for it! 

I'll describe the architecture for the newer devices such as the SBT,
it's slightly different for the older devices.

The squeeze box system architecture consists of three logical parts:
servers, players and controllers connected by a network. These do NOT
have to be separate boxes.

The server is the brains of the operation. Servers send audio data to
players, the players can only play what they get sent by a server. There
are two basic categories of server: local server (currently called LMS)
and the server in the cloud: MySqueezeBox.com. LMS manages a collection
of music files, it keeps a database of information about each of these
files, name, artist, album, year etc. In most cases this  information is
stored in tags embedded in the files. (It  can come from other sources,
but thats another discussion). The server allows the user to search 
through this information  in various ways  to choose what music to
listen to. After the user chooses a selection of files to listen to it
reads the files and streams the audio data to one or more players over 
the  network. There are several different stream formats supported, the
user can choose which to use. LMS can also connect to music streams over
the internet  (internet radio) and stream this to the  players. 

MySqueezeBox.com is  implemented by big server computers located in
various locations around the world implementing MANY MANY instances of s
special server. This server serves two primary purposes, it allows
players to receive music when you don't have a local LMS server (or 
it's turned off) and it is the gateway to  internet based music
services (Pandora, Rhapsody etc) 

The logical player is a black box, audio data comes in over the network
and audio of some form comes out. Note there is NO user  interface on
this logical construct. The user interface exists in the controller
entity.

The controller is the  user interface for the system. It  talks to a
SERVER, NOT a player. It  tells the  server to start sending  audio to a
specific player. It  sends queries to the server (to find music by
different criteria), displays the results and send the user's slection
back to the server. Most of the servers actually contain a controller in
the form of a web page as well

These different logical parts of the system can come in  different
combinations in actual hardware. For example the Touch  has all three.
The Duet comes with a separte black box player and separate hand  held
controller. There are several software players, so you can listen to the
music on your laptop etc. Some have controlers, some do not. There are
controller programs that run  on all kinds of computers, and controller
apps for iPhones, iPads and android devices. You can also get player
apps for  these as well so you can plug a headphone into the phone and
listen to  the music as well as using it to control  the hardware
devices. 

The parts in the hardware devices are not dedicated to each other,
although  they usually work that way. For example you can use the
controller in the Touch to control the player in another SB and use your
phone to control the player in the Touch. You can  have the Player  in
the Touch connected to MySqueezeBox.com while  the server in the Touch
is sending music to a software player on a laptop. 

It's an incredibly flexible system. 

The server in the Touch is special, it's called TinyLMS, it's the same
server but it has a lot of stuff turned off so it will fit in the small
amount of memory in the Touch hardware. It's not exactly what you would
call rock solid, plug and play, it's trying to do a lot on very
limited resources and if you are not careful it can become a very
frustrating experience. It sounds like from your post you are NOT a
person who would relish the task of getting TinyLMS to do what you want.
This is not to say it's useless, some people manage to use  it just
fine, but others are constantly fighting it. My impression  here  is
that you would probably be better off with a server on a separate
computer. 

This does NOT have to be a full blown expensive computer, it can be a
something like  a SheevaPlug (which looks like a wall wart power supply,
but is actually a computer) which costs $100. You plug your USB drive
into it and plug the ethernet into the network or directly into the 
Touch. There are MANY choices for a server and how you can hookup a
system. 

You can use an already existing computer, but when that computer is
turned off, you can't get any music out of  it. If a computer has WOL
(Wake On Lan) the  server can be sleeping when not playing music and the
Touch can tell it to wake up when  you want to listen to music. Many of
us hard core SqueezBox users  have dedicated music servers, because the 
music goes over the network you can stick the  

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] can't see playlists in squeezebox touch

2012-08-09 Thread dood

dood wrote: 
 i am also experiencing difficulties seeing playlists on my SBT. I have
 all my music on a QNAP NAS which stays on 24/7. I have done test
 playlists on itunes on my laptop, and exported the xml and M3U playlists
 to the playlist folder in multimedia on the NAS, but these do not show
 up on the SBT.
 
 How do I create playlists using LMS on NAS rather than computer?

ok some progress but not there yet.

I went into LMS and mapped the itunes playlists to the the NAS
multimediaplaylist folder.

Now I can see the playlists on the SBT but they are empty. I assume this
is because the songs that I put into the playlists were from the music
library on my computer (even though the music files are stored on the
NAS in the multimediamusic folder).
In itunes I can see the NAS and this displays all the songs on it.
However, I cannot drag these songs into the playlists (red circle icon
comes up), but I can drag songs from the music library to the playlists.
As I've said these songs from the music library don't show up on the
SBT.

What do I need to do?



dood's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=56698
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=95889

___
Touch mailing list
Touch@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch