Re: [videoblogging] iphone compatible video
I updated the wiki with some information. http://videoblogginggroup.pbwiki.com/iPhone-Compression Lan, this documentation rocks! now recorded for all to bear witness. Jay -- Here I am http://jaydedman.com 917 371 6790 Check out http://ryanishungry.com. Two videos a week documenting the Green movement in all its different forms.
[videoblogging] Re: irina gone
Yes. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Adam Quirk, Wreck Salvage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Awards don't mean a goddamn thing. They're stupid. They're all stupid. It's beyond me that we feel the need to set aside a night to give out these jagoff bowling trophies so all these people can pat each other on the back about how much money they're making boring the piss out of half the world. Jerry Seinfeld http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_OqvUbBNA4 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] The Vloggies (was Re: irina gone)
I''m sorry that you're sorry that Jeffrey feels that way. Richard --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, John Furrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Jeffrey. I'm sorry that you feel that way. We stand up for video producers and people investing in the space. It can get commercial and I understand the perceptions there. As the net accepts more and more independent producers new talent will emerge. That is my opinion and I'm behind that. PodTech is far from old media and in fact we'll experiment and innovate as much as we can to push the envelope on ideas and creativity. I know others feel the same way - create content, innovate, and push the envelope on new ideas. From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Taylor Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 8:57 AM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [videoblogging] The Vloggies (was Re: irina gone) The whole Podtech Affair (Irina, Lan, Vloggies, the public defenses from Scoble and Furrier) reeks of traditional (old) media, old business. Instead of standing up for something or for other people, we are left with nothing but a diluted, tasteless word salad. On 24/07/07, J. Rhett Aultman [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:wlight%40weatherlight.com wrote: I strongly agree with this. I realize it's business as usual for more traditional media businesses to use award shows as a way to scratch the backs of their VIPs and biggest stakeholders, but I find something like that entirely disingenuous in the case of PodTech and the Vloggies. Not only that, but it's bad business sense in a market where the largest stakeholders are ill defined and change every few months. -- Rhett. http://www.weatherlight.com/freetime http://www.weatherlight.com/greentime John, this is why you have to talk about this here and not on the phone with someone. If you want to engage this community then engage us. You can't have private, offline conversations about things like this. For everyone else, if you don't like the way PodTech is handling things then DON'T LET THEM HANDLE IT. Don't participate in their awards show and don't accept any awards. If nobody recognizes The Vloggies then it doesn't matter who owns the trademark. If you still want awards then someone will have to organize the community to do it. - Verdi On 7/24/07, Kent Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:digitalfilmmaker%40gmail.comdigitalfilmmaker%40gmail.com wrote: Off-list? If you want to engage my professional services, contact my agents. Barrett Garese at UTA. If you want to talk about the Vloggies, let's talk about the Vloggies here in public. I support an open awards show that is owned by no company. I think that Trademarking Vloggies gives your company too much control. The Oscars are owned by the film industry, and the Emmys are owned by the TV industry. There were several sponsors last year, don't they also have as much right to the mark of the Vloggies as PodTech? Oh but you have more rights don't you? Because the person that came up with the idea, the person that organized it and made it a success was on your dime... The person that was just let go, right after the Trademark was filed... By landgrabbing Vloggies, you are trying to own an industry, which is unconscionable. You guys are smart, you're just caught in a lot of bad decisions. You should donate that mark to the Creative Commons, or EFF, or create a new non-profit that will run the awards. That would be the right thing to do, and might start repairing the PR nightmare you guys are experiencing right now. -Kent, askaninja.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.commailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, John Furrier john@ wrote: Kent, Email me if you'd like to get involved and we can chat off list John -- http://michaelverdi.com http://spinxpress.com http://freevlog.org Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Remote Video Interviews
We're working on a new project here at The Conversations Network that would make it easy for podcasters and videobloggers to conduct remote interviews. Okay, so what do I mean by that? Imagine if you could conduct a video interview like you might do today, but the person you're interviewing is in a remote location. Think of how broadcast TV does it: A guest goes to some studio near them and sits in front of a green screen. Our goal is to do something similar for videobloggers that costs virtually nothing. Is this something you'd find interesting? Do you even include interviews in your videoblogs? It might be best to reply directly to me rather than to the list. I don't want to clog up this list with a bunch of Yes, I'm interested in remote video interview messages. I may actually start a new list/ group for this if there's enough interest. Thanks. ...doug Doug Kaye, Executive Director The Conversations Network A 501(c)(3) Non-Profit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[videoblogging] The Vloggies (was Re: irina gone)
Jeffrey, you couldn´t be more accurate on your comparison, no mather how different Podtech and Blip are. Podtech people, think about this: if anyone on this list had a similar job offer (or whatever offer ) from both companies, who do you think we would trust more? And maybe I´m just dumb, but whats with this we can´t discuss it publicly, but will talk about it in private or to someone that whants to report about it? Whats this about, PR in China? Schlomo, your heart is in the right place. Miguel. Wow. Valerie was rather..erm...brazen. I'd have needed a shower after reading such self-serving tripe. When will people get that forcing outcomes like this just. doesn't. work in the long-term? Perhaps PodTech might want to get consulting from the consistently forthright, diplomatic and direct (warts and all) Blip.tv, who has my neverending respect. They've had to deal with tough decisions, technical warts and all sorts of snafus and I have yet to see them surmount a challenge with any degree of nastiness, contrived sentiment or lack of grace. As an ad/PR person, I can tell you that they've generated PR that companies pay tens of millions to agencies for by just being organic, respectful and honest. They make it look very easy, and perhaps that's because common sense and respect IS easy. Thanks to Michael and all ye who put up with such nonsense hoping it will pay dividends for vloggers. On 24/07/07, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Personally, I don't like the idea of an awards show at all. Last year I tried to argue that point but it was clear that so many people... . - Verdi
[videoblogging] Re: The CNN/YouTube debate last night
We liked them very much, especially being in them. A very exciting and surprisingly emotional experience. That said Next time, I think you tube viewers should choose the questions, the candidate you tube type videos should be you tube type videos - a candidate and a webcam, that's it. Speaking from their hearts. Pouring their hearts out. Their videos were commercials. And not very creative at that. I hope there is no going back. That debates have this element of some kind from here on out. Now that we've got the questions, they certainly have to work on their answers. Or, are the questions the answers? hm. - Mary Jen Videopancakes http://www.videopancakes.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, jonny goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I liked the debate a lot. I think that having the public submit questions allowed CNN to pose questions to the candidates that they might have been too chicken to pose. It gave them some cover. The YouTubers were way more interesting than having the usual talking heads. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Watkins steve@ wrote: I didnt see it, Im in the UK, but I just read this story about it which I felt covered a lot of ground: http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070724/youtube_deb\ ate_070724/20070724?hub=World or http://tinyurl.com/299ukk Personally I feel that the flaw that theres still a gatekeeper, CNN, was less relevant than the fact the politicians are still the same. It may be different people asking the questions, but politicians are still going to use their training to answer the questions in the way they want, encompassing their talking points and well-practices political stances on the issues raised, or even unrelated issues. But its a start. Here in the UK we have a TV program called Question Time, where the comments and questions from the audience are often a lot more interesting than what the panel says. The ability to create a new version of public meetings, using the internet, is certainly of interest. This CNN thing wasnt that, but it was some sort of step in the right direction I guess. A big challenge will be to change the pace of these things, theres only so much reality you can get out of short soundbites and quickly moving on to the next question, I remain fascinated by whether peoples concentration spans have been really been reduced over the decades or whether there is a real appetite for longer and deeper discussions. Cheers Steve Elbows --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Gena compumavengal@ wrote: I didn't get a chance to see it, I don't have cable but one of the things I thought odd was that CNN got to choose/filter the videos before airing. Now I'm not necessarily saying that is or is not a bad thing. If CNN is footing the bill and you want to set a certain tone for the type of questions that you get it might be reasonable to have this filter. But it is still a filter/control from an established media company. It is still directed from up high and a select few are allowed to ask questions. On the one hand there is a M$M disrespect of user generated content unless and until it can be used as a marketing tool or as a way to look cool. Next you lock down the contributions from one web video host and then you further filter who can access by having it on cable, if your provider carries CNN, CSPAN or CSPAN2. Concept-wise, this is not a bad start. I'm just impatient for the next evolution. Gena http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath heathparks@ wrote: I thought I would take a break from Podtech talk for a minute and ask this. did anyone see the CNN/YouTube debate last night? I caught some of it and I had to say, I thought it was good. I thought most of the questions were good and I thought Cooper did a good job of making sure the canidates answered the questions. Maybe we are really finally reaching a tipping pointwhere canidates will realize that we as a country don't care about democrats or republicans, we want solutions and for our elected officails to start working together to address the very real issues that affect us all... Heath http://batmangeek.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] iphone compatible video
Awesome - you guys rock - thanks! I'll play around a bit more with the imovie settings to see what works and what doesn't. David On 7/25/07, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I updated the wiki with some information. http://videoblogginggroup.pbwiki.com/iPhone-Compression Lan, this documentation rocks! now recorded for all to bear witness. Jay -- Here I am http://jaydedman.com 917 371 6790 Check out http://ryanishungry.com. Two videos a week documenting the Green movement in all its different forms. -- David King davidleeking.com - blog http://davidleeking.com/etc - videoblog [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] A video production lesson: Equipment
I just posted my latest video, and thought some of you newbies, or you vets may be interested in checking it out. I go over some of the video production equipment during a freelance video production shoot. Send me some feedback if you'd like. It's called Morris Brown College: The Shoot. In the final video I'll be in an editing session, and will show the final product. I've been debating whether of not folks would find some instructionals helpful. PEACE!! AC www.myurbanreport.com http://myurbanreport.blip.tv www.youtube.com/myurbanreport
[videoblogging] Re: The CNN/YouTube debate last night
I think the debates have revolitionized participatory politics. I submitted questions, and a post debate commentary that was featured extensively on the network. I blogged about my experience yesterday, but overall it's a great time to be involved in new media. The only thing is the networks don't compensate for the citizen journalism submissions. I was talking to my brother who's a video editor at NBC, and we agree that has has to change. PEACE!! A.man.I www.myurbanreport.com http://myurbanreport.blip.tv --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, mcmpress [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We liked them very much, especially being in them. A very exciting and surprisingly emotional experience. That said Next time, I think you tube viewers should choose the questions, the candidate you tube type videos should be you tube type videos - a candidate and a webcam, that's it. Speaking from their hearts. Pouring their hearts out. Their videos were commercials. And not very creative at that. I hope there is no going back. That debates have this element of some kind from here on out. Now that we've got the questions, they certainly have to work on their answers. Or, are the questions the answers? hm. - Mary Jen Videopancakes http://www.videopancakes.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, jonny goldstein spamjonny@ wrote: I liked the debate a lot. I think that having the public submit questions allowed CNN to pose questions to the candidates that they might have been too chicken to pose. It gave them some cover. The YouTubers were way more interesting than having the usual talking heads. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Watkins steve@ wrote: I didnt see it, Im in the UK, but I just read this story about it which I felt covered a lot of ground: http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070724/youtube_ deb\ ate_070724/20070724?hub=World or http://tinyurl.com/299ukk Personally I feel that the flaw that theres still a gatekeeper, CNN, was less relevant than the fact the politicians are still the same. It may be different people asking the questions, but politicians are still going to use their training to answer the questions in the way they want, encompassing their talking points and well-practices political stances on the issues raised, or even unrelated issues. But its a start. Here in the UK we have a TV program called Question Time, where the comments and questions from the audience are often a lot more interesting than what the panel says. The ability to create a new version of public meetings, using the internet, is certainly of interest. This CNN thing wasnt that, but it was some sort of step in the right direction I guess. A big challenge will be to change the pace of these things, theres only so much reality you can get out of short soundbites and quickly moving on to the next question, I remain fascinated by whether peoples concentration spans have been really been reduced over the decades or whether there is a real appetite for longer and deeper discussions. Cheers Steve Elbows --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Gena compumavengal@ wrote: I didn't get a chance to see it, I don't have cable but one of the things I thought odd was that CNN got to choose/filter the videos before airing. Now I'm not necessarily saying that is or is not a bad thing. If CNN is footing the bill and you want to set a certain tone for the type of questions that you get it might be reasonable to have this filter. But it is still a filter/control from an established media company. It is still directed from up high and a select few are allowed to ask questions. On the one hand there is a M$M disrespect of user generated content unless and until it can be used as a marketing tool or as a way to look cool. Next you lock down the contributions from one web video host and then you further filter who can access by having it on cable, if your provider carries CNN, CSPAN or CSPAN2. Concept-wise, this is not a bad start. I'm just impatient for the next evolution. Gena http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath heathparks@ wrote: I thought I would take a break from Podtech talk for a minute and ask this. did anyone see the CNN/YouTube debate last night? I caught some of it and I had to say, I thought it was good. I thought most of the questions were good and I thought Cooper did a good job of making sure the canidates answered the questions. Maybe we are really finally reaching a tipping pointwhere canidates will realize that we as a country don't care about democrats or republicans,
[videoblogging] Re: iphone compatible video
Additional links to add - Big Picture Web Development for iPhone: http://developer.apple.com/iphone/ Drill down: Optimizing Web Applications and Content for iPhone http://developer.apple.com/iphone/designingcontent.html General info Including QuickTime In A Web Page http://www.apple.com/quicktime/tutorials/embed.html --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can't remember if anyone posted about this or not... is there some special thing I need to do to get my videos (davidleeking.com/etchttp://www.davidleeking.com/etc) to play on an iphone? Currently, they do not. For example... my last video, Miami Oceanhttp://davidleeking.com/etc/2007/07/miami-ocean.html, is a 2.2 MB .mov file. It is 320X240, and uses aac and h.264 codecs They work in itunes... just not on the iphone. Any ideas? Thanks! -- David King davidleeking.com - blog http://davidleeking.com/etc - videoblog [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Video Producer Needed
Hey Folks, My Dad is looking to hire a professional videographer in the Seattle area to video-tape Tibetan mudra teachings. If you're in Seattle, send along a sample of your work to me and I'll pass it along. Bre Pettis http://imakethings.com http://makezine.com/podcast
[videoblogging] PodCamp Pittsburgh 2 - Aug 18-19
PodCamp Pittsburgh 2 is coming! On Aug 18-19, Pittsburgh will be hosting our 2nd annual PodCamp, and you're ALL invited to attend! Never been to a PodCamp? Here's the lowdown: - FREE to attend - FREE food + drink - Podcasters, bloggers, photographers, animators, designers, programmers, journalists, businesspeople, politicians -- ALL discussing social media! - 2 full days of informal,un-conference-style conversations - Open-source scheduling via wiki -- participants program the sessions Last year, we had 180+ attendees at PCPGH -- and one wild after-party, hosted by the gang from Tiki Bar TV! This year, we expect 200-300 attendees. We'll also be webcasting every session live via Justin.TV -- AND the sessions will be archived (and searchable) for future reference. For more information, please visit: http://www.podcamppittsburgh.com You can also follow us at http://twitter.com/PCPGH And, if you'd like to sponsor the event, email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks and best wishes -- and I hope to see you in Pittsburgh! Justin Kownacki Creator / Producer, Something to Be Desired http://www.somethingtobedesired.com
Re: [videoblogging] Re: irina gone
Ah. Sorry, I didn't realize simple statements like that in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary was sufficient. My bad. I am the King of England. - Dave On 7/24/07, John Furrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I understand. From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Meade Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 1:05 PM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: irina gone On 7/24/07, John Furrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:john%40podtech.net wrote: Not true Kent. I responded immediately to Lan and what was said shall remain private. It is over and we fully respect CC and producers work. I think what you keep failing to understand, John, is that your issue WITH LAN is over your issue WITH THE COMMUNITY as to how it ended is NOT. You can't wash away one with the other, and you cant pretend they are the same and expect the community to buy it. Saying the reason we didn't have to pay Lan what he asked after we stole his stuff is private isn't going to relieve concerns by content producers as to if PodTech respects the true ownership of the content. Why would we as content producers ever choose to trust such a company with our work ever again? Your issue with Lan may be over, but your issue with the community is not ... and your constant refusal to understand the difference between the two is not painting PodTech in the best of lights. If you want the issue with the community to be over, you're going to have to a) stop confusing the two and b) talk to the community about the issue that remains. Moving discussions off list and outside the view of the community isn't going to help you do that. trust me, you don't know the whole story sounds like a load of crap to me ... either Lan owned the image or he didn't. You've acknowledged that he did. And happily for you Lan has let you off the hook but PodTech has yet to address THE COMMUNITY as to why it felt it didn't have to pay Lan what he asked even after he negotiated down from his first invoice. - Dave -- http://www.DavidMeade.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links -- http://www.DavidMeade.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] iphone compatible video
Thanks Lan for the wiki...I just copied it for reference, and the last part about saving Quicktime as a self container is very important! Lan Bui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From apple: Video formats supported: H.264 video, up to 1.5 Mbps, 640 by 480 pixels, 30 frames per second, Low-Complexity version of the H.264 Baseline Profile with AAC-LC audio up to 160 Kbps, 48kHz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats; H.264 video, up to 768 Kbps, 320 by 240 pixels, 30 frames per second, Baseline Profile up to Level 1.3 with AAC-LC audio up to 160 Kbps, 48kHz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats; MPEG-4 video, up to 2.5 Mbps, 640 by 480 pixels, 30 frames per second, Simple Profile with AAC-LC audio up to 160 Kbps, 48kHz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats What are you using to export the .mov? I'll put some stuff on the wiki like Jay said. -Lan www.LanBui.com On Jul 24, 2007, at 8:42 PM, David King wrote: Can't remember if anyone posted about this or not... is there some special thing I need to do to get my videos (davidleeking.com/etchttp://www.davidleeking.com/etc) to play on an iphone? Currently, they do not. For example... my last video, Miami Oceanhttp://davidleeking.com/etc/2007/07/miami-ocean.html, is a 2.2 MB .mov file. It is 320X240, and uses aac and h.264 codecs They work in itunes... just not on the iphone. Any ideas? Thanks! -- David King davidleeking.com - blog http://davidleeking.com/etc - videoblog [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Jimmy CraicHead TVVideo Podcast about Sailing, Travel, Craic and Cocktails www.jchtv.com - Need a vacation? Get great deals to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] PodCamp Pittsburgh 2 - Aug 18-19
Justin, I'll be at Podcamp Philly in early September. Justin Kownacki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PodCamp Pittsburgh 2 is coming! On Aug 18-19, Pittsburgh will be hosting our 2nd annual PodCamp, and you're ALL invited to attend! Never been to a PodCamp? Here's the lowdown: - FREE to attend - FREE food + drink - Podcasters, bloggers, photographers, animators, designers, programmers, journalists, businesspeople, politicians -- ALL discussing social media! - 2 full days of informal,un-conference-style conversations - Open-source scheduling via wiki -- participants program the sessions Last year, we had 180+ attendees at PCPGH -- and one wild after-party, hosted by the gang from Tiki Bar TV! This year, we expect 200-300 attendees. We'll also be webcasting every session live via Justin.TV -- AND the sessions will be archived (and searchable) for future reference. For more information, please visit: http://www.podcamppittsburgh.com You can also follow us at http://twitter.com/PCPGH And, if you'd like to sponsor the event, email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks and best wishes -- and I hope to see you in Pittsburgh! Justin Kownacki Creator / Producer, Something to Be Desired http://www.somethingtobedesired.com Jimmy CraicHead TVVideo Podcast about Sailing, Travel, Craic and Cocktails www.jchtv.com - Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] cheap new video gear
about to drop dolla' on some new video gear. would LOVE to get the cheapest out there. any leads on where one would buy the following 1) a Firestore FS-100 2) a Lowel light kit (3 Totas and 1 Rifa-88 with stands and 'brellas, dude) thanks! -- ryan junell junell.net slomohorror.com
Re: [videoblogging] american english series released
great idea! On 7/24/07, John Cardenas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: having fun with my friends here in Chengdu-China I have released my new series American English-001 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8FcMmOSa25w I have already launched Chinese series Spanish and French what is coming is Dutch lessons regards from my Chinese Island John Cardenas - aka - JohnDkar - Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user panel and lay it on us. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- http://geekentertainment.tv [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: irina gone
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, John Furrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kent, We are not shitting on the creative commons. We are proponents of it. A mistake was made plain and simple. Sorry about misspelling your name I know it's Kent not Ken. http://podtech.wordpress.com/2007/07/24/vloggies-event-making-it-open-are-videobloggers-better-off-one-year-later/ Seems like you don't know my name is Kent. Should I refer to you as Joh? :) -Kent
Re: [videoblogging] JOBS: Multimedia training position at UC Berkeley J-School (fwd)
Some of the sessions from the Knight Program are online under New Media Lecture series here http://journalism.berkeley.edu/events/bycat.php?q=newmedia -- Steve Rhodes http://flickr.com/photos/ari/ photos http://ari.typepad.com http://tigerbeat.vox.com blogs http://del.icio.us/tigerbeat interesting articles sites http://twitter.com/tigerbeat [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] commandN 100 episode party!
Celebrate 100 episodes commandN with us! Thursday, August 2nd, 7pm, at No Regrets in Liberty Village, Toronto, Canada. Ambermac and her bro Jeff MacArthur, Brian Bamcat McKechnie and Will Pate will be the posse in effect. We'd tell you what we have planned, but we don't want to ruin the surprise! All welcome! If you want to let us know you're coming add yourself to the Facebook event or the Upcoming event. http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=3441630904ref=share http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/223754/ Cheers, Will Pate http://www.willpate.org - http://www.commandn.tv
[videoblogging] I compiled a list of PodTech's latest meltdowns
Just 'cause some people keep begging for it: PodTech: The meltdown of the Valley's worst video network http://valleywag.com/tech/podtech/the-meltdown-of-the-valleys-worst-vid\ eo-network-282475.php I don't believe in writing purely negative forum posts. So: In other news, I'm addicted to pancake sandwiches. They are so tasty and eggy. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] I thought the number would be higher
I just read this AP report http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070725/ap_on_hi_te/techbit_online_video;_y\ lt=AnTJRmrd38PyHVpJnOzkW5ys0NUE and it states that on a typical day 19 percent of Americans watch some form of video online. I would think that the number would be a little higher. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
RE: [videoblogging] Re: I compiled a list of PodTech's latest meltdowns
Nick: you keep outdoing yourself again... you have a bright future in journalism... again no story there... From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Enric Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 3:32 PM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: [videoblogging] Re: I compiled a list of PodTech's latest meltdowns --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.commailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, Nick Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just 'cause some people keep begging for it: PodTech: The meltdown of the Valley's worst video network http://valleywag.com/tech/podtech/the-meltdown-of-the-valleys-worst-vid\ http://valleywag.com/tech/podtech/the-meltdown-of-the-valleys-worst-vid eo-network-282475.php I don't believe in writing purely negative forum posts. So: In other news, I'm addicted to pancake sandwiches. They are so tasty and eggy. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] You may want to correct your facts about Loren's media on PodTech: http://www.podtech.net/home/category/entertainment/1938-media/ -- Enric [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] The Vloggies (was Re: irina gone)
Nice to see we are all just getting along. jad madpod.com dummycast.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Bluestein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I''m sorry that you're sorry that Jeffrey feels that way. Richard --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, John Furrier john@ wrote: Thanks Jeffrey. I'm sorry that you feel that way. We stand up for video producers and people investing in the space. It can get commercial and I understand the perceptions there. As the net accepts more and more independent producers new talent will emerge. That is my opinion and I'm behind that. PodTech is far from old media and in fact we'll experiment and innovate as much as we can to push the envelope on ideas and creativity. I know others feel the same way - create content, innovate, and push the envelope on new ideas. From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Taylor Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 8:57 AM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [videoblogging] The Vloggies (was Re: irina gone) The whole Podtech Affair (Irina, Lan, Vloggies, the public defenses from Scoble and Furrier) reeks of traditional (old) media, old business. Instead of standing up for something or for other people, we are left with nothing but a diluted, tasteless word salad. On 24/07/07, J. Rhett Aultman wlight@mailto:wlight%40weatherlight.com wrote: I strongly agree with this. I realize it's business as usual for more traditional media businesses to use award shows as a way to scratch the backs of their VIPs and biggest stakeholders, but I find something like that entirely disingenuous in the case of PodTech and the Vloggies. Not only that, but it's bad business sense in a market where the largest stakeholders are ill defined and change every few months. -- Rhett. http://www.weatherlight.com/freetime http://www.weatherlight.com/greentime John, this is why you have to talk about this here and not on the phone with someone. If you want to engage this community then engage us. You can't have private, offline conversations about things like this. For everyone else, if you don't like the way PodTech is handling things then DON'T LET THEM HANDLE IT. Don't participate in their awards show and don't accept any awards. If nobody recognizes The Vloggies then it doesn't matter who owns the trademark. If you still want awards then someone will have to organize the community to do it. - Verdi On 7/24/07, Kent Nichols digitalfilmmaker@mailto:digitalfilmmaker%40gmail.comdigitalfilmmaker%40gmail.com wrote: Off-list? If you want to engage my professional services, contact my agents. Barrett Garese at UTA. If you want to talk about the Vloggies, let's talk about the Vloggies here in public. I support an open awards show that is owned by no company. I think that Trademarking Vloggies gives your company too much control. The Oscars are owned by the film industry, and the Emmys are owned by the TV industry. There were several sponsors last year, don't they also have as much right to the mark of the Vloggies as PodTech? Oh but you have more rights don't you? Because the person that came up with the idea, the person that organized it and made it a success was on your dime... The person that was just let go, right after the Trademark was filed... By landgrabbing Vloggies, you are trying to own an industry, which is unconscionable. You guys are smart, you're just caught in a lot of bad decisions. You should donate that mark to the Creative Commons, or EFF, or create a new non-profit that will run the awards. That would be the right thing to do, and might start repairing the PR nightmare you guys are experiencing right now. -Kent, askaninja.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.commailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, John Furrier john@ wrote: Kent, Email me if you'd like to get involved and we can chat off list John -- http://michaelverdi.com http://spinxpress.com http://freevlog.org Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] iphone compatible video
around the 24/7/07 David King mentioned about [videoblogging] iphone compatible video that: For example... my last video, Miami Oceanhttp://davidleeking.com/etc/2007/07/miami-ocean.htmlhttp://davidleeking.com/etc/2007/07/miami-ocean.html, is a 2.2 MB .mov file. It is 320X240, and uses aac and h.264 codecs final file size is not the issue so much as data rate. you need to confirm what your data rate is. iPhone wants max of 1.5 Mbps, it is probably fussy about codecs too -- cheers Adrian Miles this email is bloggable [ ] ask first [ ] private [x] vogmae.net.au [official compliance stuff:] CRICOS provider code: 00122A
[videoblogging] Re: I compiled a list of PodTech's latest meltdowns
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Nick Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just 'cause some people keep begging for it: PodTech: The meltdown of the Valley's worst video network http://valleywag.com/tech/podtech/the-meltdown-of-the-valleys-worst-vid\ eo-network-282475.php I don't believe in writing purely negative forum posts. So: In other news, I'm addicted to pancake sandwiches. They are so tasty and eggy. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] You may want to correct your facts about Loren's media on PodTech: http://www.podtech.net/home/category/entertainment/1938-media/ -- Enric
[videoblogging] Re: video coverage of Laughing Squid: Paradise Lost
I'll shoot. http://tinyurl.com/2jufuq http://tinyurl.com/2regdz ;), Enric -===- http://cirne.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Scott Beale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey guys, we are looking for a couple of people to shoot some video at our big Laughing Squid: Paradise Lost event this Saturday in San Francisco. We'll give you free admission, a Laughing Squid t-shirt and a couple of drink tickets. The video would be for our archives, but of course you can use it however you want as well (we don't need any kind of exclusive rights) and if you want to edit something together, even better. Oh and we can pay for tape stock as well. Here's more info on the event: http://laughingsquid.com/laughing-squid-paradise-lost/ We're also looking for a few lifecasting cyborgs to show up as well. Scott -- Scott Beale primary tentacle, Laughing Squid website/blog: http://laughingsquid.com hosting: http://laughingsquid.net squid list: http://laughingsquid.com/squidlist/events/ photos: http://laughingsquid.com/photo/ squid: http://squid.us
[videoblogging] video coverage of Laughing Squid: Paradise Lost
Hey guys, we are looking for a couple of people to shoot some video at our big Laughing Squid: Paradise Lost event this Saturday in San Francisco. We'll give you free admission, a Laughing Squid t-shirt and a couple of drink tickets. The video would be for our archives, but of course you can use it however you want as well (we don't need any kind of exclusive rights) and if you want to edit something together, even better. Oh and we can pay for tape stock as well. Here's more info on the event: http://laughingsquid.com/laughing-squid-paradise-lost/ We're also looking for a few lifecasting cyborgs to show up as well. Scott -- Scott Beale primary tentacle, Laughing Squid website/blog: http://laughingsquid.com hosting: http://laughingsquid.net squid list: http://laughingsquid.com/squidlist/events/ photos: http://laughingsquid.com/photo/ squid: http://squid.us
[videoblogging] JOBS: Multimedia training position at UC Berkeley J-School (fwd)
-- Forwarded message -- The Knight Digital Media Center at the University of California at Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism is seeking a multimedia training instructor for the Center's program to train professional journalists on how to do sophisticated multimedia projects. The multimedia training instructor will be responsible for the development of curriculum for the Knight Digital Media Center Multimedia Training Program, including organizing and leading training workshop sessions and creating and maintaining online tutorial content and other web-based resource materials for the workshops. A more detailed job description and instructions on how to apply online are available at: http://jobs.berkeley.edu/ Search for job# 6893 -- http://geekentertainment.tv [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Job: CBS sports mobile producer
Company: CBS Sports Mobile Location: Los Angeles, CA (TVC) Duration: 3 Months Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Multi Media Producer : CBS Sports Mobile Overview The MMP Sports Emphasis will be responsible for all sports content for CSTV/Sportsline. The ideal candidate will write, shoot, edit and post their own material for digital distribution to handsets. A serious sports fan with a wide knowledge base and solid writing skills is preferred. Must be able to fulfill the experience, education and responsibilities listed below. Education Requirements: - Advanced video production training or equivalent experience. Experience requirements: - Extensive non linear editing. Final Cut Pro preferred. - DV camera, audio and lighting experience. - Knowledge of video formats, video conversion and general audiovisual issues. - Solid technical troubleshooting skills. - Able to digest the needs of detailed projects, then prioritize and order activities. - Ability to communicate and function in a corporate environment. - Able to adhere to directives and deadlines, yet require minimal supervision. - Comfortable on Mac and PC platforms. - Motion Graphics experience a plus. - Close attention to detail. - Understanding of file sharing and server issues. Role responsibilities: - Edit and post clips on a daily basis. - Edit special projects as assigned. - Make sure all videos are to specification and legal/clearance issues - Shoot video for mobile video productions.
