Re: [videoblogging] Re: Youtube Partner Program

2007-05-18 Thread Nathan Miller
Make good videos and they will come.

nathan miller
www.bicycle-sidewalk.com
--- sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 i think for many people, tossing videos up all over
 the place is just a way
 to get started.
 the value may come when you as a content creator
 find your voice/style/focus
 and start to get scattered subscribers or just
 awareness and attention which
 can gradually build up over a year or 2.
 
 in other words, value doesnt always have immediacy
 attached to it.
 
 so using the youtube etc despite bad terms can still
 be ok for many
 creators.
 others will never want to give away any content with
 undesirable terms.
 as a rule of thumb, i agree with jay...  but surely
 there are many many
 videos that you can put out there that you can let
 go of.
 
 sull
 
 On 5/17/07, Frank Sinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
Doesn't have to be one or the other. Just trying
 to see what people
  think the value of a YouTube viewer or subscriber
 is versus someone
  who has viewed and subscribed at your vlog.
 
   Why give Youtube so much power?
   as we know in the web 2.0 world, the barrier to
 entry is a server.
  
   jay
 
  BUT you are giving YouTube MUCH power by uploading
 a video to their
  site and thus, agreeing to (quote for YouTube
 TOS):
 
   However, by submitting the User Submissions
 to YouTube, you
  hereby grant YouTube a worldwide, non-exclusive,
 royalty-free,
  sublicenseable and transferable license to use,
 reproduce, distribute,
  prepare derivative works of, display, and perform
 the User Submissions
  in connection with the YouTube Website and
 YouTube's (and its
  successor's) business, including without
 limitation for promoting and
  redistributing part or all of the YouTube Website
 (and derivative
  works thereof) in any media formats and through
 any media channels.
 
  I'm 99.99% sure MSM has NOT agreed to these TOS
 and negotiated their
  own partner TOS, so why have vloggers? Again,
 leads me to the questions:
 
  1) What is the value of a YouTube viewer and
 subscriber .
  2) For those vloggers who have posted to YouTube,
 what value have you
  seen?
 
  -Frank
 
  
  
   --
   Here I am
   http://jaydedman.com
  
   Check out the latest project:
   http://pixelodeonfest.com/
   Webvideo festival this June
  
 
   
 
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been
 removed]
 
 



Re: [videoblogging] Re: Youtube Partner Program

2007-05-18 Thread Jay dedman
  1) What is the value of a YouTube viewer and subscriber .
  2) For those vloggers who have posted to YouTube, what value have you
  seen?

here's an example.
we posted a video on our site:
http://ryanishungry.com/2007/04/22/wendy-tremayne-and-mikey-sklar-green-pioneers/

Mikey (who's featured in the video) uploaded it to Youtube:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=xO6YZa2ZB44

About 5,000 people watched the video on our site.
About 50,000 people watched it through Youtube. (we must have been put
on the front page)

Is there a difference?
I guess not really. We certainly got more relevant comments on our own site.
Like Quirk says, its important to reach out beyond the communities we
already know.
I think its important to have your own site so you control your
archives and context in which to watch your videos. But go ahead and
put them other places and see how it works out.

For Youtube, I find that the most regularly popular ones are more just
people talking into webcams. people have discussions, arguments,
joking etc. its extremely social.

So again its not an either or for me...
what i appreciate is when Mikey and Wendy (in the video) send it to
all their friends because we helped tell their story. Word starts
spreading and information is exchanged. Wendy is now here at Maker's
Faire(http://makerfaire.com/) and said she had 5 people come up to her
to find out about her project in NM. That's the connection I seek.

with any creator...i think its important to make stuff with the
audience you want to reach in mind. Just throwing it on youtube and
expecting something to have effect just seems harmless at best.

Jay



-- 
Here I am
http://jaydedman.com

Check out the latest project:
http://pixelodeonfest.com/
Webvideo festival this June


Re: [videoblogging] Re: Youtube Partner Program

2007-05-18 Thread Jay dedman
 Just to finish my waffle, I hadnt noticed that podtech have sectioned
  things more clearly than when I last looked, so yours and other's
  envirogreensustain vids are in a 'clean tech' section. But I dont get
  a sense of there being a community of viewers at podtech, due to lack
  of comments or other features that would enable such things (or I just
  cant find them).

i cant speak for how Podtech markets their site.
seems to me like they are learning.
and yes, clean tech can mean lots of things.
as with anything, all i can do is show what i know to be true.

with Ryanishungry.com, we were able to license our videos to Podtech
for one year.
we retain ownership and can post the videos to our own site throughout the year.
they've been good about the whole situation.
its not a huge amount of money...but its guaranteed money for us...and
they get regular content that's much cheaper than if they hired their
own team.

for some completely different... i wish American TV could look like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PPWDglTboI

Jay


Re: [videoblogging] Re: Youtube Partner Program

2007-05-18 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
oh Jay, the Mighty Boosh is my favourite!

it's on constant DVD in my house...

:)

On 5/18/07, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:






  Just to finish my waffle, I hadnt noticed that podtech have sectioned
   things more clearly than when I last looked, so yours and other's
   envirogreensustain vids are in a 'clean tech' section. But I dont get
   a sense of there being a community of viewers at podtech, due to lack
   of comments or other features that would enable such things (or I just
   cant find them).

  i cant speak for how Podtech markets their site.
  seems to me like they are learning.
  and yes, clean tech can mean lots of things.
  as with anything, all i can do is show what i know to be true.

  with Ryanishungry.com, we were able to license our videos to Podtech
  for one year.
  we retain ownership and can post the videos to our own site throughout the
 year.
  they've been good about the whole situation.
  its not a huge amount of money...but its guaranteed money for us...and
  they get regular content that's much cheaper than if they hired their
  own team.

  for some completely different... i wish American TV could look like this:
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PPWDglTboI

  Jay
  


-- 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com
twitter.com/trine


Re: [videoblogging] Re: Youtube Partner Program

2007-05-18 Thread Vincent Njoroge Ndonye
OH MY GOD! That was hilarious...I watched the Old Gregg
Finalehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ht8eWOLd_q8NR=1too Made my
friday evening. No need for happy hour now.
Thanks!
v.njoroge.ndonye


On 5/18/07, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Just to finish my waffle, I hadnt noticed that podtech have sectioned
  things more clearly than when I last looked, so yours and other's
  envirogreensustain vids are in a 'clean tech' section. But I dont get
  a sense of there being a community of viewers at podtech, due to lack
  of comments or other features that would enable such things (or I just
  cant find them).

 i cant speak for how Podtech markets their site.
 seems to me like they are learning.
 and yes, clean tech can mean lots of things.
 as with anything, all i can do is show what i know to be true.

 with Ryanishungry.com, we were able to license our videos to Podtech
 for one year.
 we retain ownership and can post the videos to our own site throughout the
 year.
 they've been good about the whole situation.
 its not a huge amount of money...but its guaranteed money for us...and
 they get regular content that's much cheaper than if they hired their
 own team.

 for some completely different... i wish American TV could look like this:
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PPWDglTboI

 Jay
 




-- 
regards,
vincent.njoroge.ndonye


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: Youtube Partner Program

2007-05-17 Thread tim
Hey Frank,

I'm not sure about your question but I would like to put my videos anywhere i 
can get a 50/50 or better Rev Share and still own my content and control my 
brand. I get tens of thousands of views at YouTube but I get millions of views 
and thousands of dollars using Revver.

I wish I could do the same with YouTube and other sites.




Sent from my BlackBerry wireless handheld.  

-Original Message-
From: Frank Sinton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 00:08:35 
To:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Youtube Partner Program

Great discussion - can't stop wondering: 
 
 What is the value of a link back to your independent vlog (where you 
 control the branding, experience, player, 100% of the advertising 
 and cross-promotions, merchandising, etc.) versus a revenue share on 
 a video destination site that doesn't offer you any of that control?
 
 To put it another way, what dollar value would you put on 1,000 
 regular users on your site versus 1,000,000 views on YouTube? 
 
 Thanks,
 -Frank
 
 Frank Sinton
 CEO, Mefeedia
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: mailto:frank%40mefeedia.com com
 310-927-7841 (cell)
 
 http://www.mefeedia: http://www.mefeedia.com .com - Discover, Collect, and 
Enjoy great videos 
 and podcasts
 Our blog: http://mefeedia.: http://mefeedia.com/blog com/blog
 
 --- In videoblogging@: mailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com 
yahoogroups.com, Adriana Kaegi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
  what other video sites offer better ad shares then
  youtube? just wondering,
  addy
  http://dearaddy.: http://dearaddy.com com
  --- Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
Here's a letter about youtube's new partner
   program, written by an anonymous
youtube star who is certainly, definitely,
   Absolutely NOT Kent.
http://battellemedi: http://battellemedia.com/archives/003630.php 
a.com/archives/003630.php
(via http://boingboing.: http://boingboing.net net)
   
   this is extremely interesting.
   obviously John Battelle has a bias on youtube
   advertsing since he runs
   Federated Media.
   
 *I'm a YouTube star, but YouTube wishes I
   wasn't. They would like to
 pretend I don't exist, rather than admit there
   are several roads to
 financial and critical success that don't lead
   through their corporate
 headquarters. *
   
   Its tough to take these kinds of criticisms when you
   dont know who its from.
   I always question anonymous comments and articles.
   
   
   Some shows will stick with YouTube, but the
   savviest and the most
   commercial ones will move to other video sites that
   can provide
   better splits or signing bonuses. Creators will
   start to realize that
   their storytelling talents are rare and valuable.
   
   so true.
   
   I don't know the terms this round of authors were
   guaranteed by
   YouTube, but I do know that we were offered was
   okay money, but
   something that we've already surpassed. And then
   when you factor in
   merch sales, and the value of having our own users
   and pageviews on
   top of that and controlling our own brand, we're
   coming out miles
   ahead of a typical YouTube power user.
   
   I know Youtube can push mass traffic towards any
   video it
   chooses...but asking creators to dump their personal
   site is
   dangerous. I'd like to hear more about how Youtube
   feels about letting
   creators own their own content.
   
   Lots of questions.
   its up to us creators to educate each other and not
   settle for giving
   it all away.
   
   Jay
   
   
   
   -- 
   Here I am
   http://jaydedman.: http://jaydedman.com com
   
   Check out the latest project:
   http://pixelodeonfe: http://pixelodeonfest.com/ st.com/
   Webvideo festival this June
   
  
  
  
  
  
 __
 ___Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's 
  Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when. 
  http://tv.yahoo.: http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/222 com/collections/222
 
 
 
   

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Re: [videoblogging] Re: Youtube Partner Program

2007-05-17 Thread j coffey
I'd rather have 1,000 regular users as 1 million views on You Yube can be 
fleeting. What does Josh Leo have to say? He did several million a month or so 
ago on one on You Tube. Not to say he doesn't have 1,000 loyal viewers but I'll 
take the thousand.
JCH
http://www.jchtv.com/

Frank Sinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Great 
discussion - can't stop wondering: 
 
 What is the value of a link back to your independent vlog (where you 
 control the branding, experience, player, 100% of the advertising 
 and cross-promotions, merchandising, etc.) versus a revenue share on 
 a video destination site that doesn't offer you any of that control?
 
 To put it another way, what dollar value would you put on 1,000 
 regular users on your site versus 1,000,000 views on YouTube? 
 
 Thanks,
 -Frank
 
 Frank Sinton
 CEO, Mefeedia
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 310-927-7841 (cell)
 
 http://www.mefeedia.com - Discover, Collect, and Enjoy great videos 
 and podcasts
 Our blog: http://mefeedia.com/blog
 
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Adriana Kaegi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
  what other video sites offer better ad shares then
  youtube? just wondering,
  addy
  http://dearaddy.com
  --- Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
Here's a letter about youtube's new partner
   program, written by an anonymous
 youtube star who is certainly, definitely,
   Absolutely NOT Kent.
 http://battellemedia.com/archives/003630.php
 (via http://boingboing.net)
   
   this is extremely interesting.
   obviously John Battelle has a bias on youtube
   advertsing since he runs
   Federated Media.
   
  *I'm a YouTube star, but YouTube wishes I
   wasn't. They would like to
  pretend I don't exist, rather than admit there
   are several roads to
  financial and critical success that don't lead
   through their corporate
  headquarters. *
   
   Its tough to take these kinds of criticisms when you
   dont know who its from.
   I always question anonymous comments and articles.
   
   
   Some shows will stick with YouTube, but the
   savviest and the most
   commercial ones will move to other video sites that
   can provide
   better splits or signing bonuses. Creators will
   start to realize that
   their storytelling talents are rare and valuable.
   
   so true.
   
   I don't know the terms this round of authors were
   guaranteed by
   YouTube, but I do know that we were offered was
   okay money, but
   something that we've already surpassed. And then
   when you factor in
   merch sales, and the value of having our own users
   and pageviews on
   top of that and controlling our own brand, we're
   coming out miles
   ahead of a typical YouTube power user.
   
   I know Youtube can push mass traffic towards any
   video it
   chooses...but asking creators to dump their personal
   site is
   dangerous. I'd like to hear more about how Youtube
   feels about letting
creators own their own content.
   
   Lots of questions.
   its up to us creators to educate each other and not
   settle for giving
   it all away.
   
   Jay
   
   
   
   -- 
   Here I am
   http://jaydedman.com
   
   Check out the latest project:
   http://pixelodeonfest.com/
   Webvideo festival this June
   
  
  
  
 
  
 __
 ___Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's 
  Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when. 
  http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/222
 
 
 
 
   


Jimmy CraicHead TVVideo Podcast about Sailing, Travel, Cocktails and other good 
Craic!http://www.jchtv.com/
   
-
Get the free Yahoo! toolbar and rest assured with the added security of spyware 
protection. 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: Youtube Partner Program

2007-05-17 Thread Jay dedman
  What is the value of a link back to your independent vlog (where you
  control the branding, experience, player, 100% of the advertising
  and cross-promotions, merchandising, etc.) versus a revenue share on
  a video destination site that doesn't offer you any of that control?
  To put it another way, what dollar value would you put on 1,000
  regular users on your site versus 1,000,000 views on YouTube?

why does it have to be one or the other?
Unless Youtube is paying to license your content, and you agree to
only host video on their site, then maybe this might make sense. (but
dont give up ownership to your work!!!)

Put the video on Youtube, but put it on you own site as well.
Put it other places too.

Why give Youtube so much power?
as we know in the web 2.0 world, the barrier to entry is a server.

jay


-- 
Here I am
http://jaydedman.com

Check out the latest project:
http://pixelodeonfest.com/
Webvideo festival this June


Re: [videoblogging] Re: Youtube Partner Program

2007-05-17 Thread sull
i think for many people, tossing videos up all over the place is just a way
to get started.
the value may come when you as a content creator find your voice/style/focus
and start to get scattered subscribers or just awareness and attention which
can gradually build up over a year or 2.

in other words, value doesnt always have immediacy attached to it.

so using the youtube etc despite bad terms can still be ok for many
creators.
others will never want to give away any content with undesirable terms.
as a rule of thumb, i agree with jay...  but surely there are many many
videos that you can put out there that you can let go of.

sull

On 5/17/07, Frank Sinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Doesn't have to be one or the other. Just trying to see what people
 think the value of a YouTube viewer or subscriber is versus someone
 who has viewed and subscribed at your vlog.

  Why give Youtube so much power?
  as we know in the web 2.0 world, the barrier to entry is a server.
 
  jay

 BUT you are giving YouTube MUCH power by uploading a video to their
 site and thus, agreeing to (quote for YouTube TOS):

  However, by submitting the User Submissions to YouTube, you
 hereby grant YouTube a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free,
 sublicenseable and transferable license to use, reproduce, distribute,
 prepare derivative works of, display, and perform the User Submissions
 in connection with the YouTube Website and YouTube's (and its
 successor's) business, including without limitation for promoting and
 redistributing part or all of the YouTube Website (and derivative
 works thereof) in any media formats and through any media channels.

 I'm 99.99% sure MSM has NOT agreed to these TOS and negotiated their
 own partner TOS, so why have vloggers? Again, leads me to the questions:

 1) What is the value of a YouTube viewer and subscriber .
 2) For those vloggers who have posted to YouTube, what value have you
 seen?

 -Frank

 
 
  --
  Here I am
  http://jaydedman.com
 
  Check out the latest project:
  http://pixelodeonfest.com/
  Webvideo festival this June
 

  



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: Youtube Partner Program

2007-05-17 Thread Adam Quirk, Wreck Salvage
On 5/17/07, Frank Sinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 1) What is the value of a YouTube viewer and subscriber .
 2) For those vloggers who have posted to YouTube, what value have you
 seen?


1) Equal to the value of a subscriber by any other means, so long as all you
care about is people who appreciate your work.

2) Finding an audience outside of this community, which can be (slightly)
myopic at times.

It's great to have a core group of subscribers who give feedback, criticism,
and praise on your own site.  But most people just want to see good videos
and don't care about talking to the creator.  I found that hard to believe
at first, but it has proven true time after time.

If you're lost you can look--and you will find me
time after time

-- 
Cyndi Lauper
Wreck  Salvage
551.208.4644
Brooklyn, NY
http://wreckandsalvage.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]