On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 01:11:41PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
It would be nice, if there would be the manpower to enable Linux installs on
iThingies.
I've seen a proof-of-concept Linux running on (I think) a first gen
iPad, but I don't think it's got beyond the cool this is possible
stage.
I
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 05:33:40PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
IOW, is there a rush?
Perhaps not a rush but I'd *really* like to have a predictable release
schedule.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 22 Nov 2012, at 15:57, Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk wrote:
So if you don't like that decision it should be escalated to the
Technical Committee.
I'm surprised that *anyone* can refer issues to tech ctte. Has a non DD ever
submitted something worthwhile?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:51:06PM +0100, Stefano Karapetsas wrote:
GNOME Classic is just as featureful and usable as GNOME Shell,
which makes it very suitable for a default desktop on non-3D machines.
But GNOME Fallback is going to be dropped soon.
I'm surprised nobody has talked about
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:52:44AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
If I type encfs vs into Google I get:
Honestly, doing a basic google search and splurging the results
into a mailing list post helps nobody. If you don't have personal
experience of solving the problem, don't post.
--
To
Hi - please change the Subject: of the thread if the topic of conversation
has moved on. (We're all guilty of not doing this enough…)
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:07:29AM -0600, Kevin Toppins wrote:
snip 32 line preamble
I realise your intentions are good, here, but please, it is not much help.
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 04:03:33AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
So much for the general rules... but exceptions ARE possible! And I
just try to make a case here about how important it might be!
IF you had a set of MATE packages all ready to go and you were asking
for a freeze exception for
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:22:52AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
I'd therefore like to ask if anyone here would be willing to help me
to get MATE into Debian for Jessie.
As you know, there is already an effort to package MATE ongoing (at least
#658783). The purpose of ITPs is to
Please stop top-posting.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121121151332.GA998@debian
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 03:48:08PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
MATE will not be in Wheezy and staying on Squeeze until Jessie is released is
probably not suitable for most users.
It's quite likely that if MATE packages make it into Debian at all, they
will be provided in backports, so some
On 21 Nov 2012, at 17:27, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
don't know if Ian is, but I certainly would. We have a bunch of
existing virtual packages that aren't really useful because they don't
offer any sort of guaranteed interface, and therefore cannot be
meaningfully used in package
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 01:25:38PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
The core components are always built (which includes systemd itself, as
well as udevd and journald).
For some uses the configure switches do not provide sufficient modularity.
For example, they cannot be used to build
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:10:37AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
I currently do not have facilities to build the package in question
with the host running Debian's kernel.
So how can you prove that the package builds?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 06:37:48PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
And whatever they or anybody else does in that regard, it will come
to late for wheezy.
All of MATE will come too late for Wheezy. It's already too late for
Wheezy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 09:07:17AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 15:07 +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Is this the best place for systemd assistance?
The best place to get assistance are the insane people who try to force
this into every Linux distribution, with LP leading
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 03:07:54PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Is this the best place for systemd assistance?
For systemd-in-Debian, most likely, yes.
First, systemd worked.
Now it hangs on bootup, with the following messages:
What has changed? Have you upgraded systemd or other packages?
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:54:57AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
why not warn people to use something that's known for issues only?
It isn't known for issues only. There's a lot of heat and noise about
problems with systemd, that is true, but a substantial amount of that
heat and noise is posts
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 07:44:39AM -0500, Tom H wrote:
The problem is that it's no longer possible for recent versions of
udev to compile it without compiling systemd too.
The truth is a bit more complicated. You can build just udev from the
systemd sources: make udevd rather than the default
Hi - please trim your quotes.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 03:05:55PM +0100, Morel Bérenger wrote:
If I am not wrong, there IS such a warning if you do the switch. At least,
if you remove the package sysvinit (or whatever name) with aptitude, it
will ask you to write an entire sentance which
Sorry if it doesn't make sense for me to ask this here, but:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 01:50:59PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
-Uploaders: Frederic Peters fpet...@debian.org, Michael Biebl
bi...@debian.org
+Uploaders: Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org
Was that meant to be in there?
--
To
+ good-not-evil
usertags 692613 + good-not-evil
usertags 692615 + good-not-evil
usertags 692626 + good-not-evil
usertags 692621 + good-not-evil
thanks
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 04:25:43PM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
I've found one of these - #692614 - is the whole set collected together
under a common
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 01:00:29PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
I'd like to move forward with packaging prboom-plus, but I find it
unacceptable to maintain two forks of such similarity in Debian...
Long term I think I probably agree with you. We should probably not
have both in jessie. But,
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:01:24PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 16.11.2012 11:32, schrieb Jon Dowland:
Long term I think I probably agree with you. We should probably not
have both in jessie. But, I'd like to give prboom+ a proper evaluation
before I'd consider dropping prboom - so I
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 01:00:29PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
I'd like to move forward with packaging prboom-plus, but I find it
unacceptable to maintain two forks of such similarity in Debian...
Long term I think I probably agree with you. We should probably not
have both in jessie. But,
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:01:24PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 16.11.2012 11:32, schrieb Jon Dowland:
Long term I think I probably agree with you. We should probably not
have both in jessie. But, I'd like to give prboom+ a proper evaluation
before I'd consider dropping prboom - so I
The trouble is that testing is very variable: pretty good from freeze onwards,
terrible immediately after freeze, etc. - not consistent.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 07:59:29AM -0800, Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Jon Dowland j...@debian.org wrote:
The trouble is that testing is very variable: pretty good from freeze
onwards,
terrible immediately after freeze, etc. - not consistent.
Neither is Sid
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:33:02PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
12:28 taffit The Debian website wishes to display the most up to
date debian-reference
It's absolutely clear that ther are different needs for the -reference
on the web and the -reference package in a given
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:17:52AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I made less good experiences when using IMAP, e.g. thousands of mails
once were loaded 2 times.
That sounds more likely to be a problem with your MUA than with the
imapd.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:04:10PM +, GEOFF BAGLEY
wrote:
I have poor eye-sight, and make much use of CTRL shift +
to magnify that which I need to see, and CTRL - to
reverse. This was not possible in many GNOME3 cases.
GNOME3 has an accessibility icon (silhouette of a human over
a circle)
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 05:18:52AM -0800, james gray wrote:
which vim
/usr/bin/vim
ls -l /usr/bin/vim
lrwxrwxrwx - etc/alternatives/vim
ls -l etc/alternatives/vim
lrwxrwxrwx - /usr/bin/vim.basic
the name /usr/bin/vim is managed by the alternatives system (see
update-alternatives(8)) in
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 03:00:41PM -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
So since I don't have 'aptitude or aptitude-common' installed, why is apt-get
trying to remove all my non-free programs?
Does it need to remove the non-free stuff before it can upgrade ia32-libs
ia32-libs-gtk?
I suspect what
Every post to this thread makes my heart that little bit heavier.
Can participants please
a) consider whether this is on topic to -devel and move to -user if
not;
b) trim quotes appropriately;
c) change Subject: when the subject under discussion changes
Thanks in advance.
--
To
Dowland j...@debian.org
Description:
vavoom - Advanced Doom/Heretic/Hexen/Strife engine
Closes: 676580 691741
Changes:
vavoom (1.33-5) experimental; urgency=low
.
[ Jon Dowland ]
* Reword the long description a bit. Thanks Filipus Klutiero.
Closes: #676580.
.
[ Fabian
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:27:19PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
Another idea could be to change
/lib/udev/rules.d/70-udev-acl.rules from consolekit.
It currently has
# systemd replaces udev-acl entirely, skip if active
TEST==/sys/fs/cgroup/systemd, TAG==uaccess, GOTO=acl_end
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:18:14AM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
I have taken the liberty to fix this myself in GIT master. The
vavoom executable now registeres itself as an alternative for doom
and boom and works perfectly with the freedoom wrapper script.
Furthermore, I have fixed what I
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:25:51AM -0500, Rob Owens wrote:
I use an M-Audio Delta 1010LT on Debian Squeeze.
Interesting stuff, thanks for sharing!
I have an M-Audio Audiophile 2496 which I use for some very amateur
messing around. I occasionally hook an Alesis Micron up to it, both
MIDI and the
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:43:46AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
Any news? Could you try installing libpam-systemd and report back.
Might require a reboot (or at least a relogin).
Sorry for the delay - I'm in the middle of nowhere at the moment relying
on WWAN for connectivity.
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 03:51:53PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
lucie-uboot
lucie-uboot-netconsole
If upstream refer to it as 'plum', then eradicating plum from the package
name entirely isn't sensible.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 05:06:57PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
I don't think it is currently a sensible decision to introduce
duplicate GNOME3 packages into Debian. Nautilus 3.4 is currently
available through GNOME3, so this would introduce redundancy.
wheezy will have 3.4 but 3.6
CCing Ansgar
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 04:25:51PM +0100, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote:
Ansgar has recently made an MBF against all packages including the
problematic JSON license term The Software shall be used for Good, not
Evil.
I've found one of these - #692614 - is the whole set collected
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 05:27:03PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Yes, that's correct. But that's only one of the points of my
criticism. I am in general not very much convinced by the quality of
the packages in Linux Mint.
Neither am I. I did look at cinnamon and muffin briefly, saw
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 06:52:35AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
I'm running Debian 6.0.5 with the default gnome desktop.
The default file browser (Nautilus?) does not give the
view/perspective I need.
If you are planning to upgrade to Wheezy, these are the steps
required for nautilus
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 10:40:18PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Which policy applies to #685913 (and all the other open unblocks)? The
policy announced at the beginning of the freeze or the current policy?
…or the time the unblock was filed?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 07:13:45PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Donnerstag, 8. November 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote:
As far as I can see Mr Crockford _enjoys_ being asked to change his
license. So no, please don't feed the troll.
As much as I think this licence is stupid (from my free
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 08:29:02PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Hm, I filed two unblock requests after that deadline, but before reading
the announce mail about it.
You don't state whether the decision impacts them or not, but so it goes…
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 07:21:30PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
Apologies for the lack of clarity in the d-d-a posting - the new
acceptance criteria are for unblocks filed after 11:54:49 + today.
No problem - thanks for the clarification!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 06:26:02AM -0800, houkensjtu wrote:
Basically I don't use any desktop system, instead I use the windows manager:
ratpoison. So unfortunately I don't have those utilities come with gnome...
The correct answer is probably then xrandr, a command-line tool.
--
To
Hi folks,
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 09:53:38PM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
1.7.0-1 has no humans in Maintainer and no Uploaders which is a policy
violation.
^^ I believe this is ≥ important and so qualifies for the release policy
update on November 8th,
I could fix, if the release team would
Neil clarified on -devel. Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121108203612.GD11858@debian
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:51:07AM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
since revision 1.33-4, vavoom provides the virtual boom-engine package.
However, it does not supply an alternative for the corresponding binary in
/usr/games/boom. This means, vavoom satisfies freedoom's depends on a boom-
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 11:28:40AM +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
I would personnaly rrename the package as iucode_tool. YMMV...
Debian packages cannot have underscores in their names.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Package: iucode-tool
Version: 0.8.3-1
Severity: minor
Hi,
This is report following my post
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/11/msg00113.html
Summary of situation:
• I have APT::Install-Recommends set to false
• I installed intel-microcode
• I noticed iucode-tool was not installed,
Package: systemd
Version: 44-5
Severity: normal
Hello,
As briefly mentioned on IRC - when I boot with init=/bin/systemd, the network
icon does not appear in the task bar in GNOME 3. In addition, if I try to
access network settings in the GNOME System Settings app, I get a message
The
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 01:38:03PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Would people like me to push my entire blog to Planet Debian, including
all my book reviews and software release announcements?
I saw this post after I saw your subsequent blog post but FWIW I welcome your
non-technical content on
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 05:37:06AM -0800, houkensjtu wrote:
I installed debian-wheezy on my lenovo x121e laptop, and since it comes with
a only 11.6 inch display, I plugged in a monitor through VGA port.
Fortunately without any configuration I could got the same content display on
both my
Karl's answer is very thorough for your other questions,
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 02:25:52AM -0800, houkensjtu wrote:
I know I can use the which command to detect where a executable file reside
in, but how about all the other stuff?
Take a look at locate.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 06:12:53PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Microcode updates will be applied immediately when the microcode
packages are installed or updated: you don't have to reboot. You will
have to keep the packages installed, though: as explained above, the
microcode
Changed-By: Jon Dowland j...@debian.org
Description:
chocolate-doom - Doom engine closely-compatible with vanilla doom
Changes:
chocolate-doom (1.7.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Add myself back to uploaders.
Checksums-Sha1:
e14463afa028d9155655e1b1e51386730ee68af4 2114 chocolate-doom_1.7.0-2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 22:50:59 +
Source: bup
Binary: bup
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.25~git2011.11.04-6
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jon Dowland j...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jon Dowland j
-By: Jon Dowland j...@debian.org
Description:
prboom - clone of the legendary first person shooter Doom
Closes: 579749
Changes:
prboom (2:2.5.0+dfsg2-1) experimental; urgency=low
.
* Fix a bashism in fix_upstream.sh and use the
URW-Bookman-Demi-Bold font for menu graphics
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 10:38:08PM +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote:
I could email some of them if you like?
Did you get anywhere?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
I've just uploaded chocolate-doom/1.7.0-2, with one fix, a documentation
fix only:
* Add myself back to uploaders.
1.7.0-1 has no humans in Maintainer and no Uploaders which is a
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 06:23:40PM -0300, Dr Beco wrote:
Hoping to add some 'reference', so we can compare actual microcode
versions, I find myself with
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep microcode
microcode 0x1b
...
Slighly faster to type and run
$ grep microcode /proc/cpuinfo
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 06:12:53PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Microcode updates will be applied immediately when the microcode
packages are installed or updated: you don't have to reboot. You will
have to keep the packages installed, though: as explained above, the
microcode
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
I've just uploaded chocolate-doom/1.7.0-2, with one fix, a documentation
fix only:
* Add myself back to uploaders.
1.7.0-1 has no humans in Maintainer and no Uploaders which is a
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 02:17:05PM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
Noted. The package was in experimental for several weeks and got zero
attention. My general understanding is that nobody looks at
experimental anyway.
I have a lot of sympathy with this point, personally. OTOH I've just made an
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 01:43:58PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
Hopefully because people are working on the release so that uploads to
unstable can be opened again. The quicker we release Wheezy, the quicker
this and other packages get into unstable. It's much better to work on
RC bugs than to
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 09:45:05AM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 01.11.2012 23:26, schrieb Jon Dowland:
I'd be in favour of changing rott, lgeneral and wolf3d to not require '-f'
and
treat a single argument as a path if supplied, in line with the other
targets.
It's
Hi,
Thanks for the report!
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 10:11:19AM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
bup meta requires python-pyxattr and python-pylibacl in order to
back up and restore extended attributes resp. ACLs, so they should be
listed in Recommends or at least Suggests.
I think they should
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 04:31:30PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
with its current behavious, game-data-packager is inconsistent from game to
game.
Take for example rott or wolf3d: Demo versions exist for these two games
and they are freely available on the net. There are also commercial
Hi,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
In the notes, reference is made to daily images twice:
* Before you download the daily built images, we suggest you check for known
issues.
^
* An architecture can be (temporarily) omitted from the overview of
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 08:17:52PM -0400, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
A couple of weeks ago I downloaded to my Windows 7 machine 10 DVD
iso files for debian-6.0.6-amd64. I have not yet installed Debian to
this machine.
Last night Kaspersky anti-virus detected a Trojan in one of the files:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 04:53:24PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
does it make sense to establish a list of candidates for reintroduction to
testing ?
Is this not something best managed on a case-by-case basis?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Argh. I recall having similar problems. It might be the screensaver process
segfaulting. Is there anything useful in ~/.xsession-errors?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 03:53:42PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Wrong. It will be a new thing, not related to the previous thing.
It's evidently related: if not in terms of actual reused code but in terms
of who is expected to use it and what it is to be used for.
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 08:03:02AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
I'd prefer if such a tool could replace an existing one. Why not aim at
replacing dput if there's a reason for it?
I must concur. I can't see the reason for dput, dupload and dput-ng to
co-exist. If dput-ng has the momentum and is a
Great stuff, thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121026160652.GC20294@debian
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 07:39:52PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Vi, 26 oct 12, 15:38:03, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
it is currently showed in the PTS: e.g.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/alevt.html:
problems
How many non-DDs/DMs do you think are aware of the PTS? My guess is: not
Changed-By: Jon Dowland j...@debian.org
Description:
freedm - multiplayer-oriented maps for Doom
freedoom - free game files for the 3D game DOOM
Closes: 691399
Changes:
freedoom (0.8~beta1-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Fabian Greffrath ]
* Add myself to Uploaders.
* Imported Upstream
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:06:40AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
please consider uploading the new freedoom beta release.
Would you mind if I took care of that myself?
No problem - please go ahead!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:13:45AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 26.10.2012 10:16, schrieb Jon Dowland:
No problem - please go ahead!
Done.
Great stuff!
One question: why 1.8~beta1 for the upstream release? Why not
1.8-beta1 (matching the upstream tarball more closely)
I've seen you
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:00:16PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 26.10.2012 11:41, schrieb Jon Dowland:
One question: why 1.8~beta1 for the upstream release? Why not
1.8-beta1 (matching the upstream tarball more closely)
Because that's recommended by Policy:
http://www.debian.org/doc
tags 579749 +pending
thanks
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 01:37:04PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
I can confirm that prboom is built with support for PNG screenshots
and that it saves in this format by default. Regarding the build,
libpng12-dev is currently pulled in by libdirectfb-dev, which is
Great stuff, thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121026160652.GC20294@debian
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 09:19:05AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
I have no strong opinion about this, as I simply lack the experience
with such tools. Do you already have a candidate to replace deutex
in mind or are you going to fork it and develop it into the desired
direction?
I might
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 07:23:27AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
Jon Dowland wrote:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 04:13:17PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
It appears to me that my preseed.cfg file is not being read at all.
OK. I don't know the nature of the problem you are trying to fix
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:34:13AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
I don't think it's such a severe issue.
First, as you stated, it isn't technically an FTBFS; it does not
keep you from building binary packages from the sources we provide.
It just keeps you from creating *our* sources from
Source: f2fs-tools
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: wishlist
According to [1], the on-disk layout has changed and so the packaged version
is no longer usable with the most recent patchsets floating around. Thanks!
[1]https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/22/664
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 04:13:17PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
It appears to me that my preseed.cfg file is not being read at all.
OK. I don't know the nature of the problem you are trying to fix, but could
it be reproduced/triaged in a virtual machine? It might be much quicker/easier
to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:09:33 +0100
Source: deutex
Binary: deutex
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.4.902-14
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Games Team pkg-games-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Jon
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 05:47:18PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
It seems that prboom has incorporated some features of MBF,
including support for a player-friendly dog that follows the player
through the levels (yes, WTF). The sprites for that dog have
apparently been taken from the wolf3d
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:59:54PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 22.10.2012 11:58, schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
We could simply state that we require freedom for the rebuild and add
that symlink - just as we require imagemagick, sng and deutex.
Apart from that, freedoom is the only iwad
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 05:47:18PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
It seems that prboom has incorporated some features of MBF,
including support for a player-friendly dog that follows the player
through the levels (yes, WTF). The sprites for that dog have
apparently been taken from the wolf3d
Hi,
This DSA was signed with key 0x401DAC04, which is not in any debian-keyring
package I can find, nor on pgp.mit.edu. Is this a mistake? Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 02:53:43AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
Then again,... I wonder why Ubuntu exists, if they allegedly anyway want
their changes into Debian.
And still sounds like a fork in a respect that forks usually don't
change everything.
But I mean that discussion
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:43:30AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
since version 0.6.4-4 the freedoom package does not provide a doom2.wad file
anymore for compatibility issues. However, deutex expects a file of that name
and does not consider freedoom.wad as a valid replacement. The attached
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 09:44:38AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Is prboom-plus considered the successor of prboom or is it just a
more actively developed fork? In Debian words Should prboom-plus
have Replaces: prboom?
It was originally a fork of prboom maintained by someone completely
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 09:44:38AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Is prboom-plus considered the successor of prboom or is it just a
more actively developed fork? In Debian words Should prboom-plus
have Replaces: prboom?
It was originally a fork of prboom maintained by someone completely
In my experience, preseeding is pretty awkward. My advice: start
from scratch, try to guess the right thing to put in in order to
answer the first couple of questions, try it. Did those questions
get answered? Then add a few more for the next few questions.
Repeat.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
101 - 200 of 4075 matches
Mail list logo
