On 08/06/2013 11:14 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 7 August 2013 11:22, Jay Buffington m...@jaybuff.com wrote:
ln -s /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/libvirtmod_qemu.so
$(VENV)/lib/python2.6/site-packages/
Why isn't libvirt-python on pypi? AFAICT, nothing is stopping us from
On 08/05/2013 11:26 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
I wanted to get a temperature reading from everyone on this style guideline.
My view on it is that it's a useful heuristic but shouldn't be a
golden rule applied everywhere. Things like matches are designed to be
used as a dsl:
Hey all!
Currently, there is runtime version handling code in pbr. It's been a
cause of concern for some folks because it means that pbr becomes a
runtime rather than just a build time dependency - so the suggestion has
come across that we split it out into its own library.
This becomes even
Normally I don't announce pbr releases, because you should really never
notice them (unless they're fixing a bug you happen to be hitting) BUT -
this one fixes a long-standing request that I think should make people
happy, and there are some flags that folks can take advantage of should
they want.
If you hit an error like this:
Bad md5 hash for package
https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/c/colorama/colorama-0.2.5.tar.gz#md5=c76f67ead9dc7c83700c57695ebb741e
(from https://pypi.python.org/simple/colorama/)
It means that our friends at colorama have decided to re-release
something with
On 08/02/2013 01:06 PM, James Kyle wrote:
Following up on my own thread, the fix can be integrated into
../stack.sh by adding this to the localrc:
# FIXES: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1206013
OSLOCFG_REPO=https://github.com/openstack/oslo.config.git
OSLOCFG_BRANCH=1.2.0a3
On 08/02/2013 05:23 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
Hi All,
even though Glance, has been pulled out of Nova years ago, Nova still
has a images API that proxies back to Glance. Since Nova is in the
process of creating a new, V3, API, we know have a chance to re-evaluate
this API.
* Do we still
On 07/31/2013 03:36 AM, hzguanqiang wrote:
Hey Guys,
I want to make a lxc image for openstack applying, What should I do? Is there
any documents about this?
Have you looked at the TripleO program's diskimage-builder? It's right here:
https://github.com/stackforge/diskimage-builder
Hi!
Not really. We don't support OpenStack projects having dependencies on
unreleased software. What does fwaas come from? Is this part of neutron?
On 08/01/2013 01:24 AM, Kuang-Ching Wang wrote:
Hi, I am working on fwaas Horizon support, which requires fwaas CLI to work.
Since fwaas CLI has
Also, if you're wanting to buld services on top of OpenStack that want
to respond to events - you probably want to look in to ceilometer, which
has an interface to export such events to you.
On 08/01/2013 01:02 AM, Addepalli Srini-B22160 wrote:
RPC will send the notifications to the queues that
Hey all!
There is currently an issue with which is causing a very high failure
rate in the gate. From IRC:
18:32:19 clarkb | the grenade failures seem to get very
consistent in the gate at 2013-0-27 1552UTC
18:32:27 clarkb | before that the success rate is much higher
18:34:53
On 07/24/2013 08:51 AM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
Hello
I have seen lots of discussions on blogs and twitter heating up around
Amazon API compatibility and OpenStack. This seems like a recurring
topic, often raised by pundits and recently joined by members of the
community. I think it's
On 07/23/2013 03:02 PM, Brian Curtin wrote:
On Jul 23, 2013, at 3:51 PM, Eric Windisch e...@cloudscaling.com
mailto:e...@cloudscaling.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Logan McNaughton lo...@bacoosta.com
mailto:lo...@bacoosta.com wrote:
I'm sure this has been asked
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38000/
On not-Windows, install a non-pkg_resources based script content. On
windows, defer to underlying setuptools functionality. (the test failures
showing on the patch were build farm issues which we just sorted, I'll
run-check the patch once the farm is good)
Yeah. Not moving to zc.buildout for anything. I believe it will be a better
option to just write by-hand scripts that get installed that just do:
from nova.rootwrap import cmd
return cmd.main(sys.argv)
or something. Basically, a tiny boiler-plate script that does the same
thing as a
On 07/17/2013 11:41 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/17/2013 02:35 PM, John Griffith wrote:
snip
Just to point out a few things here, first off there is no guideline
that states a company affiliation should have anything to do with the
decision on voting somebody as core. I have ABSOLUTELY NO
On 07/17/2013 02:11 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
Python 2.6 isn't one of the official supported Pythons for
testrepository, and I managed to break that when I fixed tests on
Python3.3 (which has more random dicts). So Testrepository 0.0.16
breaks on 2.6, 0.0.17 is fixed.
However until the
On 07/17/2013 08:54 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
What do you mean in (b) about upstream python not supporting python 2.6?
From what I understand here, it's the version of testrepository being
used that doesn't support py26, not python itself or openstack.
I believe he means that upstream
On 07/17/2013 07:20 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Well that's no fun,
RedhatEL and centos need python 2.6 support so it amazes/frustrates
me that 2.6 can be broke. I think we need to depend on those that are
supporting 2.6 to put pressure on upstream dependencies to ensure 2.6
compat. Or
On 07/17/2013 12:44 PM, Avishay Traeger wrote:
Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote on 07/17/2013 09:40:02 PM:
The affiliation of core team members should not come into a decision
like this.
It is assumed that all core team members are wearing their upstream
hat and aren't there merely to
On 07/16/2013 11:42 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com
mailto:mar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 14:28 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Monty Taylor
mord...@inaugust.com
Hi!
Sorry - we've been a bit busy and this got put on the back burner. I
believe that ttx has done some work over the last couple of weeks ...
Theirry, any updates from your end?
Github as an option is problematic for several reasons. The ones that
come to mind are that it's not opensource, it
) and to publish packages to PyPI on tags just
like our other projects.
Have fun everyone.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net wrote:
On 07/12/2013 04:29 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Monty Taylor wrote
On 07/11/2013 05:20 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 19:49 -0400, Monty Taylor wrote:
I'd like top-post and hijack this thread for another exception related
thing:
a) Anyone writing code such as:
try:
blah()
except SomeException:
raise
On 07/11/2013 05:43 AM, Thomas Hervé wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com
mailto:mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
I'd like top-post and hijack this thread for another exception related
thing:
a) Anyone writing code such as:
try
On 07/11/2013 05:43 AM, Thomas Hervé wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com
mailto:mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
I'd like top-post and hijack this thread for another exception related
thing:
a) Anyone writing code such as:
try
On 07/11/2013 06:22 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/11/2013 05:43 AM, Thomas Hervé wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com
mailto:mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
I'd like top-post and hijack this thread for another exception
related
thing
On 07/11/2013 01:12 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
Just as a general statement, outside the scope of openstack, I don't
think sqlite is intended to support schema evolution. From the sqlite
docs [1]: SQLite supports a limited subset of ALTER TABLE. [...] It is
not possible to rename a column,
On 07/11/2013 02:40 PM, David Ripton wrote:
OpenStack is currently divided. Older projects like Nova use
sqlalchemy-migrate. Some newer projects like Neutron use alembic.
I'd personally like to see everything in Alembic, but migrating all the
Nova scripts in a way that didn't break
On 07/11/2013 03:12 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 07/11/2013 02:40 PM, David Ripton wrote:
OpenStack is currently divided. Older projects like Nova use
sqlalchemy-migrate. Some newer projects like Neutron use alembic.
I'd personally like to see everything in Alembic, but migrating all
On 07/11/2013 08:01 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 07/12/2013 07:29 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
We've got the upstream pypi and rtfd credentials now, the project should
be moved in to openstack systems soon enough. I also went through and
cleaned up build and test stuff work work like our stuff
On 07/11/2013 11:38 PM, Gareth wrote:
I heard there's a talk about this issue in #openstack-infra last night
(china standard time), what's the conclusion of that?
BTW, how to find meeting log of #openstack-infra? I didn't find it
in http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/
We don't log it
Hey all,
I'd like to propose an official program to the TC - refstack, a program
for verifying interoperability between implementations via FITS testing.
Official Title: OpenStack Interoperability
Initial PTL: Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com
Mission Statement:
Develop and maintain FITS
.
On Jul 9, 2013 8:03 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com
mailto:mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
Hey all,
I'd like to propose an official program to the TC - refstack, a program
for verifying interoperability between implementations via FITS testing.
Official Title: OpenStack
On 07/09/2013 10:55 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Kieran Spear kisp...@gmail.com
mailto:kisp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
There's a review up to make Horizon pass H304 (no relative imports):
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/35664/
Old-style
On 07/09/2013 02:05 PM, Geronimo Orozco wrote:
Hi, I am very interested in scalabity and HA with horizon is there any
effort to provide nginx to devstack(for start) ?
I'm not sure that devstack is going to be the best place to poke at
scaling concerns or HA concerns for horizon. (the best way
As per the recent TC decision around programs, the existing programs
need to provide a name, acting PTL and Mission Statement. Enjoy:
Official Title: OpenStack Infrastructure
PTL: Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com
Mission Statement:
Develop and maintain the tooling and infrastructure needed
On 07/04/2013 06:49 AM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
On 07/03/2013 06:14 PM, Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona wrote:
Bicho [1] now has a Gerrit backend, which has been tested with
OpenStack's Gerrit. We have used it to produce the MySQL database dump
available at [2] ( gerrit.mysql.7z ). You can use it
Hey all!
A few things are happening in the world of python that are have an
impact on us. The end story is good, and things are getting both simpler
and better (and in a few weeks - MUCH faster for many of us) ... in the
mean time, there may be some evil bunny rabbits.
tl;dr - your virtualenv
On 07/03/2013 07:26 AM, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Boris Pavlovic bo...@pavlovic.me wrote:
Question:
Why we should put in oslo slqlalchemy-migrate monkey patches, when we are
planing to switch to
On 07/02/2013 10:50 AM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
###
Goal
###
We should fix
On 07/02/2013 01:13 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 09:58 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Thomas Goirand wrote:
So, shouldn't the .mo files be generated at build time only, and be kept
out of the Git?
+1
Yep, agree too.
Interestingly, last time I checked, devstack
On 07/02/2013 05:46 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 2 July 2013 21:32, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
mailto:thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Thierry Carrez
On 06/27/2013 12:54 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
On 06/27/2013 05:04 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
Let's do it! (On Thierry's timetable so that we get valuable practice
talking about onboarding programs.)
Sounds good to me as long as we all agree that Localization/Translations
are a technical
On 06/29/2013 02:14 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 06/30/2013 12:16 AM, Mark Washenberger wrote:
Hi Thomas,
We switched to using entrypoints for creating our binaries.
Can you explain this a bit more?
Unfortunately, this means you need to have the glance version
installed in some sense in
On 06/29/2013 08:02 PM, John Bresnahan wrote:
I believe we should fix the unittests to not shell out to glance-manage
in that manner. One of the nice things about moving the code from bin/
to glance.cmd is that it's available inside of the source tree for
unittests! :) What we want to do is
proposals and
discussions - completely the opposite. I want them to connect to
developers and vice versa.
That's why I believe that GitHub worths trying.
-- Jarda
[1] http://www.invisionapp.com/
[2] http://www.invisionapp.com/
[3] http://www.govisually.com/
On 2013/19/06 03:49, Monty
On 06/25/2013 12:42 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Anne Gentle wrote:
Dare I ask, what about TryStack? Infra seems to get a ton under it but
that's where I'd place it if I had to state a preference.
I'd see TryStack as a separate program, with the goal of maintaining an
infrastructure that
On 06/24/2013 05:50 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi everyone,
Official OpenStack projects are those under the oversight of the
Technical Committee, and contributing to one grants you ATC status
(which in turn you use to elect the Technical Committee members).
The list of official projects
On 06/24/2013 05:56 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 22:50 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hey,
Pulling this out of gerrit for discussion.
Background is one of my patches to diskimage-builder was -1ed because I
terminated the title line of the commit message with a period:
On 06/24/2013 06:19 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 06/24/2013 06:15 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 06/24/2013 05:56 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 22:50 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hey,
Pulling this out of gerrit for discussion.
Background is one of my patches to diskimage
On 05/29/2013 08:48 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
mailto:thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
On the other hand, we're finding a large chunk of the work we're doing
is changing defaults.
/#/c/33456/) but
keep run_test.sh for the time being as there are things it does
that we don't have simple ways of doing yet. Since run_tests.sh
will be around for a while it does make sense to move it into
oslo.
best, Joe
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Monty Taylor
mord
On 06/18/2013 12:09 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
I notice on some projects like nova and quantum (I presume with milestone
proposed commits)
that the 2013.2.b1 tag was created on the now removed milestone-proposed
branch.
Therefore `git describe` and `git log --decorate` etc. on master,
Hey all!
I've done a bit of investigation of cloud databases, and have put up a
couple of changes to migrate databases we care about (gerrit, wiki,
paste, etherpad) to be cloud databases. Basically this just comes down
to passing in hostname to the puppet modules and not having puppet
create the
Chmouel and I had a chat about running the swift functional tests today.
As it stands now, they need a v1 swift, although chmouel is interested
in running them against v2 as well.
In any case, I proposed the following:
Add a job that is triggered by swift commits for running functional tests.
On 05/13/2013 11:03 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Anne Gentle a...@openstack.org
mailto:a...@openstack.org wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com
mailto:mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 05/11
On 05/11/2013 08:58 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust..com
mailto:mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 05/11/2013 05:48 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust
into too much
trouble along the way.
Brad Knowles bknow...@momentumsi.com wrote:
On May 12, 2013, at 9:52 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
I would really like to keep the marketing/business folks out of our
source code.
Most importantl, I would really like to keep the lawyers out
I have been arguing for:
mutnuaq
Granted, it takes a minute to learn how to type, but it's just a little
snarky, and it takes up the exact same number of letter. However, it
does screw with sorting. SO - what about:
qumutna
It's a little bit easier to wrap your head around, it's still clearly
On 05/11/2013 04:07 PM, Asher Newcomer wrote:
Or even better, just continue to call it openstack networking. The code
names only serve to confuse the uninitiated. They needlessly steepen the
learning curve and slow uptake.
The problem with OpenStack Networking (or getting rid of codenames)
Jeremy Stanly on IRC just suggested kumquat... but to that I respond:
qumkuat
Same benefits as qumutna - except it's more pronouncable.
On 05/11/2013 04:07 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
I have been arguing for:
mutnuaq
Granted, it takes a minute to learn how to type, but it's just a little
Neat!
Have you seen any of the work around nova baremetal (which is
transitioning to be called ironic?) Related to that is a set of virtual
power drivers which allow for treating virtual machines like real
machines - so that you can use nova to pxe boot a kvm or a virtualbox or
a vmware instance.
On 05/11/2013 05:48 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust..com
mailto:mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 05/11/2013 04:07 PM, Asher Newcomer wrote:
Or even better, just continue to call it openstack networking. The
code
On 04/24/2013 11:07 AM, Brian Lamar wrote:
On Apr 24, 2013, at 10:50 AM, Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Brian Lamar brian.la...@rackspace.com
So the question again becomes how can we get XenServer into the
gate.
Hi Lamar,
I understand
, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 04/24/2013 11:07 AM, Brian Lamar wrote:
On Apr 24, 2013, at 10:50 AM, Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Brian Lamar brian.la...@rackspace.com
So the question again becomes how can we get XenServer into the
gate.
Hi Lamar,
I
The Sprint 2013 TC Election has concluded. The at-large members elected are:
vishy
ttx
For a term of one year.
mikal
For a term of six months.
Congratulations.
http://www.cs.cornell.edu/w8/~andru/cgi-perl/civs/results.pl?id=E_5af0b5341a01b892
___
Hey all!
186 of 618 voters have cast ballots in the TC election. Tomorrow is the
last day ... go vote now!
Monty
PS. Look for an email titled Poll: Spring 2013 OpenStack TC Election
and click the link
___
Mailing list:
I confirm that Thierry is eligible to run for a seat on the TC.
On 03/15/2013 11:32 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'd like to run for reelection to one of the Technical Committee
directly-elected seats.
For those who don't know me, I've been handling release management
duties
I confirm that Carl is eligible to run for a seat on the TC.
On 03/15/2013 07:08 PM, Carl Perry wrote:
Greetings -
I would like to run for a TC seat as well. My platform is a focus on
deployment and operations for OpenStack. I'm not going to mince words:
deploying OpenStack is hard.
I confirm that Chris is eligible to run for a seat on the TC.
On 03/18/2013 06:11 PM, Chris Behrens wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to announce my candidacy for a seat on the OpenStack
Technical Committee.
- General background -
I have over 15 years of experience designing and building
I confirm that Eric is eligible to run for a seat on the TC.
On 03/18/2013 03:23 PM, Eric Windisch wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to run for a seat on the Technical Committee. I am a Principal
Engineer at Cloudscaling, but I am running as an individual.
For over two years, beginning with Bexar,
If you are an ATC, you should by this point have received a link that
will let you vote in the OpenStack TC election. You should vote.
If you read it, you will note that it says February 28 is the end date.
That is an error - March 28 is the end date.
I confirm that Michael is eligible to run for a seat on the TC.
On 03/15/2013 11:27 AM, Michael Still wrote:
Hi. I'd like to run for the TC Spring 2013 election. I am a senior
software engineer at Rackspace in their OpenStack group, and have
worked in a variety of cloud devops roles for the
I confirm that Chuck is eligible to run for a seat on the TC.
On 03/16/2013 12:59 PM, Chuck Thier wrote:
Hello all,
I would like to run for a seat on the TC. I am one of the original
developers of Rackspace Cloud Files which became Openstack Swift, and
was deeply involved with the
I confirm that Gary is eligible to run for a seat on the TC.
On 03/15/2013 02:13 PM, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to run for the Technical Committee in the up and coming elections.
I am a Principle Software Engineer at Red Hat. I have been actively
developing OpenStack since the Essex
I confirm that Vishvananda is eligible to run for a seat on the TC.
On 03/15/2013 05:41 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
Hello all,
I would like to run for a seat on The Technical Comittee. I have been working
on Nova since it was a project as Nasa and I have been heavily involved in
The PTL elections for the Havana cycle have completed. The new PTL's are:
Nova: Russell Bryant
Ceilometer: Julien Danjou
Keystone: Dolph Matthews
Congratulations!
As a side note, we had over 50% participation in each of the three
elections, which I have been told is actually a really good
Now that the TC elections have ended, we now have three at-large seats open.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TC_Elections_Spring_2013
Mar 15 - 21: Open candidacy to directly-elected TC positions
Mar 22 - 28: TC elections
The persons ranking 1st and 2nd will get one-year seats on the TC,
On 03/12/2013 11:00 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 12.03.2013 18:33, Jesse Noller wrote:
And I've put multiple compromise proposals out there to begin
mitigating the problem *now* (i.e. for non-updated versions of
setuptools), and every time, the objection is, no, we need to ban it
all now,
If you are an ATC for a keystone, nova or ceilometer, you should have
now received in the mail your link to vote in the PTL election for that
project be sure to vote! The elections end March 14.
For the other projects, there was only one person standing for election,
so congratulations guys, you
On 03/04/2013 10:02 AM, Nirlay Kundu wrote:
Which tool would you use for configuration management geared towards
Openstack api : Chef, Puppet, Saltstack ? If anybody has experience with
Saltstack, please let me know the advantages , shortcomings.
I would use Heat to orchestrate thing WRT the
Hi everyone!
Spring is upon us, which means it's time to overthrow our leadership and
replace it with new (or the same) leadership!
First we elect PTL's, then we elect TC at-large members. So first things
first:
** PTL Candidacy Nomination Period is open from now until March 7 **
If you would
On 02/28/2013 05:07 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 1 March 2013 06:34, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
Sorry - I've been tied up pretty tight the last couple of days - I'll
jump back on kicking these in the next little bit.
Robert - I may need to get you to help me look at one
Hey all,
OpenStack recently ran in to a problem where one of our depends released
a new version that only works with Python 3 and not Python 2. While I
wholeheartedly support the gusto of that, and also can't wait until we
can move to Python 3, there's a tooling issue here.
If I'm doing pip
On 02/27/2013 02:05 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
Hey all,
OpenStack recently ran in to a problem where one of our depends released
a new version that only works with Python 3 and not Python 2. While I
wholeheartedly support
the next-gen package tools to solve our problems, but
waiting on them doesn't really seem to be so workable ... how opposed
would people be to adding some logic in to pip to be helpful with this?
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 02/27/2013 02:05 PM, Donald
On 02/27/2013 04:04 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
But wouldn't this only be a change in pip/easy_install, not PyPI
itself? I suppose you could explicitly break the external links by
having them point to nothing if you
Thrilling. I will be there with bells on and a laundry list in hand.
Seriously - this is becoming a big-ticket item for the OpenStack
Infrastructure team - and I think there are some really big wins to be
had without needing to write distutils4 :) So thanks for organizing this!
Monty
On
On 02/07/2013 09:19 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
As folks may be aware, I am moderating a panel called Directions in
Packaging on the Saturday afternoon at PyCon US.
Before that though, I am also organising what I am calling a
On 01/25/2013 12:54 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On Fri Jan 25 2013 06:29:32 AM CST, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
f) Hood is only 4 letters. Think about that when you think about typing
hatfield a lot. Also, if we name it hatfield, we're going to have to
have the M summit somewhere
Hey all!
Here's my pitch for Hood:
a) It's the tallest mountain in Oregon, and honestly, it's a pretty
kick-ass mountain in general
b) Being in the pacific northwest, the mountain itself is quite
regularly in the clouds. That's gotta count for something.
c) It's actually a volcano.
d) Mount Hood
...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 01/24/2013 02:50 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
Hey all!
Here's my pitch for Hood:
a) It's the tallest mountain in Oregon, and honestly, it's a pretty
kick-ass mountain in general
b) Being in the pacific northwest, the mountain
I vote for hoodies.
On 01/25/2013 09:28 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Will we have hoodies instead of t-shirts for ODS attendees?
Doug
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com
mailto:mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
Hey all!
Here's my pitch for Hood
** Project changed: openstack-ci = cinder
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039763
Title:
Multiple nova-volume services fails to create volume on second storage
server when using
** No longer affects: openstack-ci
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bengali Manual, which is subscribed to LoCo Team Portal.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881019
Title:
Lp login is broken after account merge
Status in Canonical SSO provider:
Hi everybody!
I'd like to run for a seat on the Technical Committee.
- OpenStack Experience -
I run the CI and Developer Automation team for OpenStack. There hasn't
always been a team, but as long as there has been, I've been doing it.
Before there was a proper team, there was Soren and I, and
On 08/03/2012 09:57 AM, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote:
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 17:48 +0300, Gary Kotton wrote:
Will you also be fixing the pep8 issues in the common code?
When the pep8 running in openstack-common reports the issue, yes, it
will make sense to fix it. Since I have already
On 07/29/2012 07:47 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
Hey!
This might be fairly tricky to fix properly given the design of the
devstack gate. I could be wrong, it might not be terrible now that we
can release new client lib versions to PyPI more quickly. The devstack
gate explicitly tests proposed
Hey!
This might be fairly tricky to fix properly given the design of the
devstack gate. I could be wrong, it might not be terrible now that we
can release new client lib versions to PyPI more quickly. The devstack
gate explicitly tests proposed change to trunk of one project against
tip of trunk
901 - 1000 of 2124 matches
Mail list logo
