Hi,
Am 25.12.23 um 22:57 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
I didn't file it for the plain build issue. Nevertheless, if it broke so
many projects you probably should do a full-fledged rebuild and send
Well, mitigated by 2.12.3, but still.
But again, this is completely off-topic to what I filed
Hi,
Am 25.12.23 um 22:57 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
I didn't file it for the plain build issue. Nevertheless, if it broke so
many projects you probably should do a full-fledged rebuild and send
Well, mitigated by 2.12.3, but still.
But again, this is completely off-topic to what I filed
Hi,
Am 25.12.23 um 22:33 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
The tests are still failing and there is no patch anywhere yet, see
Sorry, link got lost:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158423
and c) you ignore the actual issue here at hand and that is that the new
libxml2 breaks
Hi,
Am 25.12.23 um 22:33 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
The tests are still failing and there is no patch anywhere yet, see
Sorry, link got lost:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158423
and c) you ignore the actual issue here at hand and that is that the new
libxml2 breaks
Hi,
Am 25.12.23 um 16:31 schrieb Aron Xu:
Hi Rene,
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 3:39 AM Rene Engelhard wrote:
Am Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 08:03:56PM +0100 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
LibreOffice builds (patch available), but doesn't yet build with 2.12.
"... but doesn't yet succeed the tests with
Hi,
Am 25.12.23 um 16:31 schrieb Aron Xu:
Hi Rene,
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 3:39 AM Rene Engelhard wrote:
Am Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 08:03:56PM +0100 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
LibreOffice builds (patch available), but doesn't yet build with 2.12.
"... but doesn't yet succeed the tests with
retitle 1059158 libreoffice-core-nogui: Can't open a spreadsheet from
python uno on 32bits because libforuilo.so is missing.
thanks
Hi,
Am 20.12.23 um 18:42 schrieb Gerard Henri Pille:
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
So this is even
retitle 1059158 libreoffice-core-nogui: Can't open a spreadsheet from
python uno on 32bits because libforuilo.so is missing.
thanks
Hi,
Am 20.12.23 um 18:42 schrieb Gerard Henri Pille:
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
So this is even
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1052740 in graphite2 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Hi,
Am 23.12.23 um 11:43 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Hi,
Am 23.12.23 um 02:40 schrieb Bastian Germann:
graph_legend.dot should have quotes around the font name references.
Ah, thanks. Unfortunately this is a generated file...
And yes, I also noticed that the FreeSans.ttf is at fault. Indeed I
Hi,
Am 23.12.23 um 11:43 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Hi,
Am 23.12.23 um 02:40 schrieb Bastian Germann:
graph_legend.dot should have quotes around the font name references.
Ah, thanks. Unfortunately this is a generated file...
And yes, I also noticed that the FreeSans.ttf is at fault. Indeed I
Hi,
Am 23.12.23 um 11:43 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Hi,
Am 23.12.23 um 02:40 schrieb Bastian Germann:
graph_legend.dot should have quotes around the font name references.
Ah, thanks. Unfortunately this is a generated file...
And yes, I also noticed that the FreeSans.ttf is at fault. Indeed I
Hi,
Am 23.12.23 um 02:40 schrieb Bastian Germann:
graph_legend.dot should have quotes around the font name references.
Ah, thanks. Unfortunately this is a generated file...
This is probably a doxygen bug.
Probably. That's why there's no action here. TBH I don't think this is
the only
Hi,
Am 23.12.23 um 02:40 schrieb Bastian Germann:
graph_legend.dot should have quotes around the font name references.
Ah, thanks. Unfortunately this is a generated file...
This is probably a doxygen bug.
Probably. That's why there's no action here. TBH I don't think this is
the only
Hi,
Am 23.12.23 um 02:40 schrieb Bastian Germann:
graph_legend.dot should have quotes around the font name references.
Ah, thanks. Unfortunately this is a generated file...
This is probably a doxygen bug.
Probably. That's why there's no action here. TBH I don't think this is
the only
[ please keep the bug in CC to record discussions like this ]
Hi,
Am 20.12.23 um 21:08 schrieb Gerard H. Pille:
I chose core-nogui since I found the missing lib in libreoffice-core.
I found no info on libforuilo.
Internal LO component-
User Interface for LibreOffice?
Yes.
And the "for"?
[ please keep the bug in CC to record discussions like this ]
Hi,
Am 20.12.23 um 21:08 schrieb Gerard H. Pille:
I chose core-nogui since I found the missing lib in libreoffice-core.
I found no info on libforuilo.
Internal LO component-
User Interface for LibreOffice?
Yes.
And the "for"?
forwarded 1059158 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158795
thanks
Hi,
Am 20.12.23 um 18:42 schrieb Gerard Henri Pille:
Package: libreoffice-core-nogui
So -calc-nogui. Since with only -core-nogui nothing seriously should open at
all anyway :)
Version: 4:7.4.7-1
You
forwarded 1059158 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158795
thanks
Hi,
Am 20.12.23 um 18:42 schrieb Gerard Henri Pille:
Package: libreoffice-core-nogui
So -calc-nogui. Since with only -core-nogui nothing seriously should open at
all anyway :)
Version: 4:7.4.7-1
You
Am Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 08:03:56PM +0100 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> LibreOffice builds (patch available), but doesn't yet build with 2.12.
"... but doesn't yet succeed the tests with 2.12"
> S=/home/rene/LibreOffice/git/libreoffice-24-2 && I=$S/instdir && W=$
Am Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 08:03:56PM +0100 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> LibreOffice builds (patch available), but doesn't yet build with 2.12.
"... but doesn't yet succeed the tests with 2.12"
> S=/home/rene/LibreOffice/git/libreoffice-24-2 && I=$S/instdir && W=$
Package: libxml2
Version: 2.12.3+dfsg-0exp1
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
Hi,
LibreOffice builds (patch available), but doesn't yet build with 2.12.
But that is not the point of this issue.
While test building current 24.2 snapshot which will become 24.2 rc1
later this week I get
[build
Package: libxml2
Version: 2.12.3+dfsg-0exp1
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
Hi,
LibreOffice builds (patch available), but doesn't yet build with 2.12.
But that is not the point of this issue.
While test building current 24.2 snapshot which will become 24.2 rc1
later this week I get
[build
(-)
New commits:
commit d7577174b541e68158d228aa41192227c10a252f
Author: Rene Engelhard
AuthorDate: Fri Dec 15 23:45:04 2023 +0100
Commit: Miklos Vajna
CommitDate: Mon Dec 18 08:51:38 2023 +0100
fix system-abseil build even with 2022 version
actually it seems it was a internal
vcl/qa/cppunit/a11y/atspi2/atspi2.cxx |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit 0034d2ab9382da86340738137218791a4ccc9c90
Author: Rene Engelhard
AuthorDate: Sun Dec 17 12:38:11 2023 +0100
Commit: Michael Weghorn
CommitDate: Sun Dec 17 20:36:47 2023
vcl/qa/cppunit/a11y/atspi2/atspi2.cxx |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit e7f298e8e35935de86ea0373fa68eabc343ee091
Author: Rene Engelhard
AuthorDate: Sun Dec 17 12:38:11 2023 +0100
Commit: Michael Weghorn
CommitDate: Sun Dec 17 19:45:17 2023
configure.ac |9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
New commits:
commit e89723103313ec4366ee58144c47d7a5c16bf838
Author: Rene Engelhard
AuthorDate: Fri Dec 15 17:45:27 2023 +0100
Commit: René Engelhard
CommitDate: Fri Dec 15 19:32:10 2023 +0100
check abseil version
Hi,
Am 14.12.23 um 07:57 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Hi,
Am 14.12.23 um 06:01 schrieb tony mancill:
A FTBFS bug [1] cropped up in gpredict recently that appears to be to a
change in libreoffice-writer-nogui. The build step that fails is:
$ soffice --strace --writer --headless --convert-to pdf
Hi,
Am 14.12.23 um 07:57 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Hi,
Am 14.12.23 um 06:01 schrieb tony mancill:
A FTBFS bug [1] cropped up in gpredict recently that appears to be to a
change in libreoffice-writer-nogui. The build step that fails is:
$ soffice --strace --writer --headless --convert-to pdf
Hi,
Am 14.12.23 um 06:01 schrieb tony mancill:
A FTBFS bug [1] cropped up in gpredict recently that appears to be to a
change in libreoffice-writer-nogui. The build step that fails is:
$ soffice --strace --writer --headless --convert-to pdf gpredict-user-manual.odt
Warning: failed to launch
Hi,
Am 14.12.23 um 06:01 schrieb tony mancill:
A FTBFS bug [1] cropped up in gpredict recently that appears to be to a
change in libreoffice-writer-nogui. The build step that fails is:
$ soffice --strace --writer --headless --convert-to pdf gpredict-user-manual.odt
Warning: failed to launch
Hi,
Am 13.12.23 um 16:19 schrieb Andreas Tille:
Control: tags -1 help
Am Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 09:52:48PM +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
/usr/bin/install: cannot stat './parallel_cheat_bw.pdf': No such file or
directory
This file is (re-)created via
libreoffice --headless --convert-to pdf
Hi,
Am 13.12.23 um 16:19 schrieb Andreas Tille:
Control: tags -1 help
Am Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 09:52:48PM +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
/usr/bin/install: cannot stat './parallel_cheat_bw.pdf': No such file or
directory
This file is (re-)created via
libreoffice --headless --convert-to pdf
vcl/qa/cppunit/complextext.cxx |2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
New commits:
commit 2c8e0630097477cdfbcd481d27893f34a179a69e
Author: Rene Engelhard
AuthorDate: Sat Dec 9 09:30:22 2023 +0100
Commit: Tomaž Vajngerl
CommitDate: Mon Dec 11 10:21:53 2023 +0100
add missing
vcl/qa/cppunit/complextext.cxx |2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
New commits:
commit 94d0cf4d4e308627922c4afb5e38523ea4f6af37
Author: Rene Engelhard
AuthorDate: Sat Dec 9 09:30:22 2023 +0100
Commit: René Engelhard
CommitDate: Sun Dec 10 09:05:54 2023 +0100
add missing
retitle 1057434 libreoffice-numbertext: NUMBERTEXT() gives Err: 504
thanks
Am 05.12.23 um 18:56 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
When trying to use the =NUMBERTEXT(5) formula in Libreoffice Calc, you get an
'Err: 504' error in those cells.
Confirmed..
Cause is
$ debdiff libreoffice-numbertext_1.0.11
retitle 1057434 libreoffice-numbertext: NUMBERTEXT() gives Err: 504
thanks
Am 05.12.23 um 18:56 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
When trying to use the =NUMBERTEXT(5) formula in Libreoffice Calc, you get an
'Err: 504' error in those cells.
Confirmed..
Cause is
$ debdiff libreoffice-numbertext_1.0.11
retitle 1057434 libreoffice-numbertext: NUMBERTEXT() gives Err: 504
thanks
Am 05.12.23 um 18:56 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
When trying to use the =NUMBERTEXT(5) formula in Libreoffice Calc, you get an
'Err: 504' error in those cells.
Confirmed..
Cause is
$ debdiff libreoffice-numbertext_1.0.11
tag 1057434 + confirmed
retitle 1057434 libreoffice-numbertext 1.0.11-3 is broken; NUMBERTEXT(5)
gives Err: 504
thanks
Hi,
Am 05.12.23 um 02:27 schrieb Alexandre Bonneau:
Package: libreoffice-numbertext
Version: 1.0.11-3
Severity: grave
When trying to use the =NUMBERTEXT(5) formula in
tag 1057434 + confirmed
retitle 1057434 libreoffice-numbertext 1.0.11-3 is broken; NUMBERTEXT(5)
gives Err: 504
thanks
Hi,
Am 05.12.23 um 02:27 schrieb Alexandre Bonneau:
Package: libreoffice-numbertext
Version: 1.0.11-3
Severity: grave
When trying to use the =NUMBERTEXT(5) formula in
tag 1057434 + confirmed
retitle 1057434 libreoffice-numbertext 1.0.11-3 is broken; NUMBERTEXT(5)
gives Err: 504
thanks
Hi,
Am 05.12.23 um 02:27 schrieb Alexandre Bonneau:
Package: libreoffice-numbertext
Version: 1.0.11-3
Severity: grave
When trying to use the =NUMBERTEXT(5) formula in
Hi,
Am 03.12.23 um 14:13 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
I did some more tests.
In my standard local build environment (cowbuilder[1] --login chroot)
it fails.
if I chroot() into exactly that same chroot (as it is on disk), it works.
If I use a pbuilder --login chroot it succeeds.
Sorry
Hi,
Am 03.12.23 um 12:59 schrieb Stephan Bergmann:
On 12/2/23 16:38, Mike Kaganski wrote:
On 02.12.2023 17:46, Rene Engelhard wrote:
In any case this is bad. My filesystem (I think from 2020 or so)
apparently shows it (ls -l does) but I wouldn't be sure for other,
old ones (like Debians
Hi,
Am 29.10.23 um 11:13 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
(The workaround would be --without-java which I verified to work on
zelenka (see aboe), but this opens a can of worms. Not only disabling
some (built-in) features like the Report Builder but especially since
there is Java-based extensions (_all
Hi,
Am 23.10.23 um 21:59 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 29.10.23 um 11:13 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> (The workaround would be --without-java which I verified to work on
> zelenka (see aboe), but this opens a can of worms. Not only disabling
> some (built-in) features like the Repor
Hi,
Am 01.11.23 um 20:42 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
(The workaround would be --without-java which I verified to work on my
rpi4, but this opens a can of worms. Not only disabling some (built-in)
features like the Report Builder but especially since there is
Java-based extensions (_all!) which
Hi again,
for advoidance of doubt:
I said:
> I think this change should be reverted.
I mean:
From 8a0015c35f3f137e4f3a80e40616bc078e265a1c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Kaganski
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 16:43:49 +0300
Subject: Drop allownonascii check from pre-commit checks
That one
Hi,
After a recent pull of master I get
[build CUT] filter_textfilterdetect
S=/home/rene/LibreOffice/git/master && I=$S/instdir && W=$S/workdir &&
mkdir -p $W/CppunitTest/ && rm -fr
$W/CppunitTest/filter_textfilterdetect.test.user && cp -r $W/unittest
Source: libreoffice
Version: 4:7.5.9~rc1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wontfix trixie
Hi,
apparently mdds 2.1/liborcus 0.19 migrated to testing even though
Build-Depends clearly say
libmdds-dev (<< 2.1~),
libmdds-dev (>= 2.0),
and
liborcus-dev (<<
Source: libreoffice
Version: 4:7.5.9~rc1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wontfix trixie
Hi,
apparently mdds 2.1/liborcus 0.19 migrated to testing even though
Build-Depends clearly say
libmdds-dev (<< 2.1~),
libmdds-dev (>= 2.0),
and
liborcus-dev (<<
Source: libreoffice
Version: 4:7.5.9~rc1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wontfix trixie
Hi,
apparently mdds 2.1/liborcus 0.19 migrated to testing even though
Build-Depends clearly say
libmdds-dev (<< 2.1~),
libmdds-dev (>= 2.0),
and
liborcus-dev (<<
tag 1056104 + wonffix
thanks
Hi,
Am 17.11.23 um 18:30 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
So it would boil down to
rene@frodo:~/LibreOffice/git/master/debian$ git diff rules
diff --git a/rules b/rules
index e7152c60..ed7a8157 100755
--- a/rules
+++ b/rules
@@ -2247,6 +2247,7 @@ config_host.mk
tag 1056104 + wonffix
thanks
Hi,
Am 17.11.23 um 18:30 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
So it would boil down to
rene@frodo:~/LibreOffice/git/master/debian$ git diff rules
diff --git a/rules b/rules
index e7152c60..ed7a8157 100755
--- a/rules
+++ b/rules
@@ -2247,6 +2247,7 @@ config_host.mk
severity 1056104 wishlist
thanks
Am 16.11.23 um 23:52 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
LibreOffice features a prompt that pops up every now and then, asking
users to get involved or to donate. I'm not sure asking repeatedly is
reasonable,
Not sure.
We need people who care about portability.
severity 1056104 wishlist
thanks
Am 16.11.23 um 23:52 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
LibreOffice features a prompt that pops up every now and then, asking
users to get involved or to donate. I'm not sure asking repeatedly is
reasonable,
Not sure.
We need people who care about portability.
Hi,
Am 16.11.23 um 21:14 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
-
Failed to install: No such file or directory at
/<>/solenv/bin/ooinstall line 102.
-
No, totally unrelated. (And I wonder how you got into this at all.)
And besides that, if it was that that it already built ever
tag 1056074 + moreinfo
tag 1056074 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
Am 16.11.23 um 20:46 schrieb gl...@debian.org:
Source: libreoffice
Version: 4:7.5.8-1
Severity: normal
User:gl...@debian.org
Usertags: boost183 ftbfs-boost183-transition
Hi,
we are preparing the transition of all libs on the
+-
5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 82a955498bf1e0d4ca7a582425bd30866ca7eb75
Author: Rene Engelhard
AuthorDate: Mon Oct 30 20:27:12 2023 +0100
Commit: René Engelhard
CommitDate: Mon Nov 6 20:02:07 2023 +0100
add --with-system-zxcvbn
Hi,
Am 03.11.23 um 13:18 schrieb Gabor Karsay:
Rene Engelhard schrieb am 03.11.23 um 06:12:
Am 02.11.23 um 23:25 schrieb Gabor Karsay:
I haven't uploaded it yet, I don't know if I should target
experimental or unstable?
unstable, please.
I've uploaded to https://mentors.debian.net
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1055267 in libreoffice reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1055267 in libreoffice reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Am 02.11.23 um 23:25 schrieb Gabor Karsay:
thank you, I tried your fix with experimental libreoffice and pushed
it to https://salsa.debian.org/gkarsay/parlatype-libreoffice-extension
I haven't uploaded it yet, I don't know if I should target
experimental or unstable?
unstable, please. It
Hi,
Am 01.11.23 um 16:37 schrieb John David Anglin:
The attached change fixes orcus_test_xml_mapped test on hppa hardware:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=liborcus=hppa=0.17.2-4=1698851675=0
Erm? Please don't tell me you apply stuff on packages extra to what's in
the archive
Hi,
Am 01.11.23 um 16:37 schrieb John David Anglin:
The attached change fixes orcus_test_xml_mapped test on hppa hardware:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=liborcus=hppa=0.17.2-4=1698851675=0
Erm? Please don't tell me you apply stuff on packages extra to what's in
the archive
Hi,
I just saw that you uploaded parlatype fixing its RC bug [1]
Can you fix this bug, too? I just uploaded the last LibreOffice of 7.5.x
series ever to unstable. I think we should move to LibreOffice 7.6 asap,
especially since 24.2 is around the corner too and we need experimental
to test
Hi,
since LibreOffice 7.6 (which added some more tests which were manual
before to the automatic set) the testtools' bridge test fails:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice=armhf=4%3A7.6.2-5=1698791231=0
only on armhf. armel and arm64 just work.
it says
[build CHK]
Hi,
Am 30.10.23 um 00:52 schrieb Kohei Yoshida:
On 10/29/23 14:02, Rene Engelhard wrote:
This doesn't fail on master, so I'd assume I miss some other (maybe
even not directly related) patch?
Given that this is related to Gnumeric import, the only thing I can
think of is this commit
tag 1055048 + moreinfo
Thanks
Am 30. Oktober 2023 09:12:05 MEZ schrieb Nicolas Patrois
:
>Package: libreoffice-writer
>Version: 4:7.5.8~rc1-2
>Severity: normal
>Tags: upstream
>
>Dear Maintainer,
>
>I have problems when I try to create overlapping lines in tables.
(...)
Since 7.5.8 is
tag 1055048 + moreinfo
Thanks
Am 30. Oktober 2023 09:12:05 MEZ schrieb Nicolas Patrois
:
>Package: libreoffice-writer
>Version: 4:7.5.8~rc1-2
>Severity: normal
>Tags: upstream
>
>Dear Maintainer,
>
>I have problems when I try to create overlapping lines in tables.
(...)
Since 7.5.8 is
Hi,
Am 30.10.23 um 00:52 schrieb Kohei Yoshida:
On 10/29/23 14:02, Rene Engelhard wrote:
This doesn't fail on master, so I'd assume I miss some other (maybe
even not directly related) patch?
Given that this is related to Gnumeric import, the only thing I can
think of is this commit
https
Hi,
Am 29.09.23 um 03:16 schrieb Kohei Yoshida:
I just upgraded on the master branch the orcus library to the latest
version of 0.19.0. This version includes an experimental support for
Apache Parquet format import, but it relies on an external library
called Apache Arrow[1]. The support
Hi,
since LibreOffice 7.6 (which added some more tests which were manual
before to the automatic set) the testtools' bridge test fails:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice=s390x=4%3A7.6.2-3=1698170938=0
See the discussion upstream in
Hi,
Am 24.10.23 um 15:45 schrieb René Engelhard:
Am 24. Oktober 2023 08:58:22 MESZ schrieb John Paul Adrian
Glaubitz:
Hello!
On Mon, 2023-10-23 at 23:20 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
we're explicitly building with OpenJDK 8 while Debian builds
with OpenJDK 17 [2] which might explain
Hi,
Am 23.10.23 um 23:06 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
On Mon, 2023-10-23 at 21:59 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
since LibreOffice 7.6 (which added some more tests which were manual
before to the automatic set) the testtools' bridge test fails:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php
Hi,
forgot to edit $SUBJECT. This is just ppc64el for now.
(While s390x also has broken bridges --without-java doesn't seem to help
here unfortunately :/)
Regards,
Rene
Am 23.10.23 um 21:59 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Hi,
since LibreOffice 7.6 (which added some more tests which were manual
Hi,
Am 23.10.23 um 00:10 schrieb John David Anglin:
The build fails on real hppa hardware (i.e., not qemu):
[...]
Exactly the same binary runs successfully under qemu.
Maybe there is a timing issue in the orcus::file_content::~file_content
destructor?
That is something for you as hppa porter
Hi,
Am 23.10.23 um 00:10 schrieb John David Anglin:
The build fails on real hppa hardware (i.e., not qemu):
[...]
Exactly the same binary runs successfully under qemu.
Maybe there is a timing issue in the orcus::file_content::~file_content
destructor?
That is something for you as hppa porter
Hi,
since LibreOffice 7.6 (which added some more tests which were manual
before to the automatic set) the testtools' bridge test fails:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice=ppc64el=4%3A7.6.2-3=1697981409=0
See the discussion upstream in
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1054239 in libixion reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1054239 in libixion reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Hi,
Am 19.10.23 um 19:08 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
Source: libixion
Version: 0.17.0-3
0.17.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid patch
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libixion=i386=0.19.0-1=1697292545=0
So not 0.17.0.
Or does it also happen on sid? Yes, it does..
Hi,
Am 19.10.23 um 19:08 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
Source: libixion
Version: 0.17.0-3
0.17.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid patch
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libixion=i386=0.19.0-1=1697292545=0
So not 0.17.0.
Or does it also happen on sid? Yes, it does..
Hi,
Am 19.10.23 um 19:08 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
Source: libixion
Version: 0.17.0-3
0.17.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid patch
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libixion=i386=0.19.0-1=1697292545=0
So not 0.17.0.
Or does it also happen on sid? Yes, it does..
tag 1053670 + unreproducible
tag 1053670 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Am 08.10.23 um 15:08 schrieb Kerstin Hoef-Emden:
Probably an update of libreoffice and its components.
Probably?
The last update of "libreoffice and its components" was for 12.1 in July.
If it appeared recently I'd guess
tag 1053670 + unreproducible
tag 1053670 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Am 08.10.23 um 15:08 schrieb Kerstin Hoef-Emden:
Probably an update of libreoffice and its components.
Probably?
The last update of "libreoffice and its components" was for 12.1 in July.
If it appeared recently I'd guess
Source: libreoffice-parlatype-extension
Version: 3.1.1-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I see parlatype-libreoffice-extension failing with the new upstream
release of libreoffice in experimental (see
severity 1051968 wishlist
reassign 1051968 tasksel
retitle 1051968 please make task-mate-desktop install libreoffice-gnome
thanks
Hi,
Am 15.09.23 um 04:33 schrieb Charles Boling:
Package: libreoffice
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
(Sorry if wrong pkg; had trouble finding
severity 1051968 wishlist
reassign 1051968 tasksel
retitle 1051968 please make task-mate-desktop install libreoffice-gnome
thanks
Hi,
Am 15.09.23 um 04:33 schrieb Charles Boling:
Package: libreoffice
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
(Sorry if wrong pkg; had trouble finding
severity 1051474 important
thanks
Hi,
Am 08.09.23 um 19:19 schrieb Bastien Roucariès:
Source: libreoffice
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Justification: Document embdeded code copy + copyright
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team
Since when is that serious? It isn't. There have been no
severity 1051474 important
thanks
Hi,
Am 08.09.23 um 19:19 schrieb Bastien Roucariès:
Source: libreoffice
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Justification: Document embdeded code copy + copyright
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team
Since when is that serious? It isn't. There have been no
severity 1051474 important
thanks
Hi,
Am 08.09.23 um 19:19 schrieb Bastien Roucariès:
Source: libreoffice
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Justification: Document embdeded code copy + copyright
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team
Since when is that serious? It isn't. There have been no
Hi,
Am 04.09.23 um 14:23 schrieb Dan Horák:
for the record, we haven't seen this issue on s390x in Fedora, only on
ppc64le.
Interesting. (Note that I don't run "all the other tests" on
!amd64/!arm64/!armhf because of the sysiphos work dealt with in the
other thread, but just testtools and
Hi,
Am 02.09.23 um 09:33 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Hi,
Am 31.08.23 um 10:21 schrieb Dan Horák:
...
[CXX] vcl/qa/cppunit/GraphicTest.cxx
[CXX] vcl/qa/cppunit/GraphicDescriptorTest.cxx
two floats struct test failed
four floats struct test failed
standard test failed
exception occurred: error
Hi,
Am 31.08.23 um 10:21 schrieb Dan Horák:
...
[CXX] vcl/qa/cppunit/GraphicTest.cxx
[CXX] vcl/qa/cppunit/GraphicDescriptorTest.cxx
two floats struct test failed
four floats struct test failed
standard test failed
exception occurred: error: test failed! at
fixed 1045940 0.18.1-1
thanks
Am 14.08.23 um 20:09 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 14.08.23 um 18:05 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
dh_autoreconf_clean
dh_clean
rm: cannot remove './doc/_doxygen': Is a directory
rm: cannot remove './doc/tmp': Is a dir
fixed 1045940 0.18.1-1
thanks
Am 14.08.23 um 20:09 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 14.08.23 um 18:05 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
dh_autoreconf_clean
dh_clean
rm: cannot remove './doc/_doxygen': Is a directory
rm: cannot remove './doc/tmp': Is a dir
reassign 1045940 src:libixion
found 1045940 0.16.1-3
severity 1045940 minor
thanks
Am 14.08.23 um 18:05 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
dh_autoreconf_clean
dh_clean
rm: cannot remove './doc/_doxygen': Is a directory
rm: cannot remove './doc/tmp': Is a dir
reassign 1045940 debhelper
affects 1045940 src:libixion
severity 1045940 normal
thanls
Hi,
Am 13.08.23 um 21:20 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
Source: libixion
No.
> This is probably a clear violation of Debian Policy section 4.9
(clean target),
but this is filed as severity:minor for now,
reassign 1045940 debhelper
affects 1045940 src:libixion
severity 1045940 normal
thanls
Hi,
Am 13.08.23 um 21:20 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
Source: libixion
No.
> This is probably a clear violation of Debian Policy section 4.9
(clean target),
but this is filed as severity:minor for now,
tag 1042994 + unreproducible
tag 1042994 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Am 04.08.23 um 01:22 schrieb Thomas Florek:
Launching LO Draw (and also LO Impress) did not work, either from the
plasma desktop or from the console.
Works fine here. (Clean sid VM with experimentals LO)
Even tried extra in
201 - 300 of 26080 matches
Mail list logo
