: fix double free of sendbuf in some cases.
Link:
https://github.com/rsyslog/librelp/commit/4a6ad8637c244fd3a1caeb9a93950826f58e956a
** Affects: librelp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Matthew Ruffell (mruffell)
Status: In Progress
** Affects: rsyslog (Ubuntu)
Imp
Hi Tobias,
If you have a moment, could you please help test the new adcli package
in -proposed? Mainly focusing on testing Bionic, to ensure the
regression has been fixed.
Can you run through some tests with and without the --use-ldaps flag?
You can install the new adcli package in -proposed
To anyone following this bug:
As we get ready to re-release the new adcli package which implements the
--use-ldaps flag, if you are happy to spend a few moments testing the
new package, I would really appreciate it. I really don't want to cause
another regression again.
You can install the new
To anyone following this bug:
As we get ready to re-release the new adcli package which implements the
--use-ldaps flag, if you are happy to spend a few moments testing the
new package, I would really appreciate it. I really don't want to cause
another regression again.
You can install the new
Performing verification for Bionic
Firstly, I installed adcli and libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit from
-updates:
adcli 0.8.2-1
libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit 2.1.27~101-g0780600+dfsg-3ubuntu2.1
>From there, I joined a Active Directory realm:
https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/zJhvpRzktk/
Next, I enabled
Performing verification for Bionic
Firstly, I installed adcli and libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit from
-updates:
adcli 0.8.2-1
libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit 2.1.27~101-g0780600+dfsg-3ubuntu2.1
>From there, I joined a Active Directory realm:
https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/zJhvpRzktk/
Next, I enabled
Hi @hloeung, these patches are available in 4.15.0-128-generic, and
5.4.0-58-generic.
They are both re-spins of 4.15.0-126-generic and 5.4.0-56-generic,
respectively.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
Hi @hloeung, these patches are available in 4.15.0-128-generic, and
5.4.0-58-generic.
They are both re-spins of 4.15.0-126-generic and 5.4.0-56-generic,
respectively.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hi Benjamin,
The respun kernel has now landed in -updates, and is version
4.15.0-128-generic.
Please re-schedule the maintenance window for the Launchpad git server,
and re-attempt moving to the fixed kernel.
Thanks,
Matthew
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Hi Benjamin,
The respun kernel has now landed in -updates, and is version
4.15.0-128-generic.
Please re-schedule the maintenance window for the Launchpad git server,
and re-attempt moving to the fixed kernel.
Thanks,
Matthew
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Performing verification for Focal.
I spun up a m5d.4xlarge instance on AWS, to utilise the 2x 300GB NVMe
drives that support block discard.
I enabled -proposed, and installed the 5.4.0-58-generic kernel.
The following is the repro session running through the full testcase:
Performing verification for Focal.
I spun up a m5d.4xlarge instance on AWS, to utilise the 2x 300GB NVMe
drives that support block discard.
I enabled -proposed, and installed the 5.4.0-58-generic kernel.
The following is the repro session running through the full testcase:
Performing verification for Bionic.
I spun up a m5d.4xlarge instance on AWS, to utilise the 2x 300GB NVMe
drives that support block discard.
I enabled -proposed, and installed the 4.15.0-128-generic kernel.
The following is the repro session running through the full testcase:
Performing verification for Bionic.
I spun up a m5d.4xlarge instance on AWS, to utilise the 2x 300GB NVMe
drives that support block discard.
I enabled -proposed, and installed the 4.15.0-128-generic kernel.
The following is the repro session running through the full testcase:
gt;
> Cheers,
>
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 05:13, Matthew Ruffell
> wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, so there was a LOT happening in this thread, so I'd use some quick
> > > summary.
> > > Since what I'd like to know:
> >
> > > 1) Does this cyrus-sasl
Hi Markus,
I am deeply sorry for causing the regression. We are aware, and tracking
the issue in bug 1907262.
The kernel team have started an emergency revert and you can expect
fixed kernels to be released in the next day or so.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Hi Markus,
I am deeply sorry for causing the regression. We are aware, and tracking
the issue in bug 1907262.
The kernel team have started an emergency revert and you can expect
fixed kernels to be released in the next day or so.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Hi Thimo,
Firstly, thank you for your bug report, we really, really appreciate it.
You are correct, the recent raid10 patches appear to cause filesystem
corruption on raid10 arrays.
I have spent the day reproducing, and I can confirm that the
4.15.0-126-generic, 5.4.0-56-generic and
Hi Thimo,
Firstly, thank you for your bug report, we really, really appreciate it.
You are correct, the recent raid10 patches appear to cause filesystem
corruption on raid10 arrays.
I have spent the day reproducing, and I can confirm that the
4.15.0-126-generic, 5.4.0-56-generic and
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Groovy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Bionic)
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Groovy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Bionic)
broken in Bionic. Focal onward already have the patch and
work fine.
Let me know if you have any more questions, happy to answer.
Thanks,
Matthew
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:57 PM Matthew Ruffell
wrote:
>
> Hello Eric and Lukasz,
>
> I have created new debdiffs for adcli. Please r
s Lost+Found present.
I can confirm it is the patches listed at the top of the email, but I have not
had an opportunity to bisect to find the exact root cause. I will do that once
we confirm what Ubuntu stable kernels are affected and begin reverting the
patches.
Let me know if you need any more details.
Thanks,
Matthew Ruffell
Hi Thimo,
Thank you for the very detailed bug report. I will start investigating this
immediately.
Thanks,
Matthew
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907262
Title:
raid10: discard
Hi Thimo,
Thank you for the very detailed bug report. I will start investigating this
immediately.
Thanks,
Matthew
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907262
Title:
c 8, 2020 at 12:28 AM Christian Ehrhardt
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 3:45 AM Matthew Ruffell
> wrote:
> >
> ...
> > Again, I apologise for the regression, and things are on their way to being
> > fixed.
>
> Thanks for jumping on it once it was identifi
is required. I only made both
of these to lower round trip time due to timezones if you don't like the option
one idea.
Thanks,
Matthew
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 3:25 PM Matthew Ruffell
wrote:
>
> Hi Eric, Lukasz,
>
> Please review and potentially sponsor the cyrus-sasl2 debdff attached
&g
Attached is option two: a debdiff for adcli, which builds on
0.8.2-1ubuntu2, which re-introduces all of the --use-ldaps patches, and
also adds a depends to the fixed libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit at greater
or equal to relationship. Use this if option 1 is a no go.
** Patch added: "debdiff for
Attached is option two: a debdiff for adcli, which builds on
0.8.2-1ubuntu2, which re-introduces all of the --use-ldaps patches, and
also adds a depends to the fixed libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit at greater
or equal to relationship. Use this if option 1 is a no go.
** Patch added: "debdiff for
Attached is option two: a debdiff for adcli, which builds on
0.8.2-1ubuntu2, which re-introduces all of the --use-ldaps patches, and
also adds a depends to the fixed libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit at greater
or equal to relationship. Use this if option 1 is a no go.
** Patch added: "debdiff for
Attached is option one: a debdiff for adcli, which builds on
0.8.2-1ubuntu1 and simply adds a depends to the fixed libsasl2-modules-
gssapi-mit at greater or equal to relationship. This will require the
0.8.2-1ubuntu2 package in -unapproved queue to be deleted.
** Patch added: "debdiff for adcli
Attached is option one: a debdiff for adcli, which builds on
0.8.2-1ubuntu1 and simply adds a depends to the fixed libsasl2-modules-
gssapi-mit at greater or equal to relationship. This will require the
0.8.2-1ubuntu2 package in -unapproved queue to be deleted.
** Patch added: "debdiff for adcli
Attached is option one: a debdiff for adcli, which builds on
0.8.2-1ubuntu1 and simply adds a depends to the fixed libsasl2-modules-
gssapi-mit at greater or equal to relationship. This will require the
0.8.2-1ubuntu2 package in -unapproved queue to be deleted.
** Patch added: "debdiff for adcli
://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adcli/+bug/1906627
On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 3:32 PM Matthew Ruffell
wrote:
>
> Status update:
>
> - all recent releases of sssd and adcli have been pulled from -updates and
> -security, and placed back into -proposed.
>
> - I made a debdiff to r
://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adcli/+bug/1906627
On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 3:32 PM Matthew Ruffell
wrote:
>
> Status update:
>
> - all recent releases of sssd and adcli have been pulled from -updates and
> -security, and placed back into -proposed.
>
> - I made a debdiff to r
** Tags added: sts-sponsor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906627
Title:
GSS-SPNEGO implementation in cyrus-sasl2 is incompatible with Active
Directory, causing recent adcli
** Tags added: sts-sponsor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906627
Title:
GSS-SPNEGO implementation in cyrus-sasl2 is incompatible with Active
Hi Eric, Lukasz,
Please review and potentially sponsor the cyrus-sasl2 debdff attached
to LP1906627.
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adcli/+bug/1906627
It fixes the root cause of the GSS-SPNEGO implementation being incompatible with
Microsoft's implementation in Active Directory.
Attached is a debdiff for cyrus-sasl2 on Bionic, which resolves the
incompatibilities of the GSS-SPNEGO implementation with the one in
Active Directory.
** Patch added: "cyrus-sasl2 debdiff for Bionic"
Attached is a debdiff for cyrus-sasl2 on Bionic, which resolves the
incompatibilities of the GSS-SPNEGO implementation with the one in
Active Directory.
** Patch added: "cyrus-sasl2 debdiff for Bionic"
** Summary changed:
- adcli fails, can't contact LDAP server
+ GSS-SPNEGO implementation in cyrus-sasl2 is incompatible with Active
Directory, causing recent adcli regression
** Description changed:
- Package: adcli
- Version: 0.8.2-1ubuntu1
- Release: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS
+ [Impact]
- When
** Summary changed:
- adcli fails, can't contact LDAP server
+ GSS-SPNEGO implementation in cyrus-sasl2 is incompatible with Active
Directory, causing recent adcli regression
** Description changed:
- Package: adcli
- Version: 0.8.2-1ubuntu1
- Release: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS
+ [Impact]
- When
Hi everyone,
Firstly, I deeply apologise for causing the regression.
Even with three separate people testing the test packages and the packages in
-proposed, the failure still went unnoticed. I should have considered
the impacts
of changing the default behaviour of adcli a little more deeply
on Bionic, and given them instructions to dowongrade to the version in
the -release pocket.
Again, I am sorry for causing the regression. On Monday I will begin fixing up
cyrus-sasl2 on Bionic to have a working GSS-SPNEGO implementation.
Thanks,
Matthew
On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 12:33 PM Matthew Ruffell
Junior
wrote:
>
> On Friday, December 04 2020, Matthew Ruffell wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Firstly, I deeply apologise for causing the regression.
>
> Thanks for working on this and for the detailed analysis, Matthew.
>
> --
> Sergio
> GPG key ID:
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906627
Title:
adcli fails, can't contact LDAP server
To manage
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906627
Title:
adcli fails, can't contact
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Bionic)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthew Ruffell (mruffell)
--
You received
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Bionic)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthew Ruffell (mruffell)
--
You received
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1906627 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906627
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1906627
adcli fails, can't contact LDAP server
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Attached is a debdiff to revert the changes we made to adcli to restore
functionality to GSS-API.
** Patch added: "Debdiff for adcli on Bionic"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adcli/+bug/1906627/+attachment/5441133/+files/lp1906627_adcli_bionic.debdiff
--
You received this bug
Attached is a debdiff to revert the changes we made to adcli to restore
functionality to GSS-API.
** Patch added: "Debdiff for adcli on Bionic"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adcli/+bug/1906627/+attachment/5441133/+files/lp1906627_adcli_bionic.debdiff
--
You received this bug
Hi everyone,
Firstly, I deeply apologise for causing the regression.
Even with three separate people testing the test packages and the packages in
-proposed, the failure still went unnoticed. I should have considered
the impacts
of changing the default behaviour of adcli a little more deeply
Yes, when --use-ldaps is specified, adcli will make a TLS connection to
the domain controller, and speak LDAPS. This works, and is the reason
why this bug slipped through our regression testing. I should have
tested without the --use-ldaps flag as well.
Regardless, this bug seems to be caused by
Yes, when --use-ldaps is specified, adcli will make a TLS connection to
the domain controller, and speak LDAPS. This works, and is the reason
why this bug slipped through our regression testing. I should have
tested without the --use-ldaps flag as well.
Regardless, this bug seems to be caused by
I built the current upstream master branch of adcli, and it too fails on
Bionic:
https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/vsgfxyb9X7/
This must be why the exact same patches work on Focal. The problem
probably isn't adcli itself, but more likely a library it depends on.
# apt depends adcli
adcli
Depends:
Fix Released
** Changed in: adcli (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: adcli (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: adcli (Ubuntu Bionic)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthew Ruffell (mruffell)
--
You received this bug notification
** Tags added: regression-update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906627
Title:
adcli fails, can't contact LDAP server
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Also affects: adcli (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906627
Title:
adcli fails, can't contact LDAP server
To manage
Hi Benjamin,
I have good news. The SRU has completed, and the new kernels have now
been released to -updates. Their versions are:
Bionic:
4.15.0-126-generic
Focal:
5.4.0-56-generic
You can go ahead and schedule that maintenance window now, to install
the latest kernel from -updates. These
Hi Benjamin,
I have good news. The SRU has completed, and the new kernels have now
been released to -updates. Their versions are:
Bionic:
4.15.0-126-generic
Focal:
5.4.0-56-generic
You can go ahead and schedule that maintenance window now, to install
the latest kernel from -updates. These
Hi Benjamin,
No worries about being busy.
Now, the kernel is scheduled to be released early next week, around the
30th of November. I think at this stage it is best to wait it out and
install the kernel once it reaches -updates.
That way you will have a fixed kernel that is supported by
Hi Benjamin,
No worries about being busy.
Now, the kernel is scheduled to be released early next week, around the
30th of November. I think at this stage it is best to wait it out and
install the kernel once it reaches -updates.
That way you will have a fixed kernel that is supported by
Verification for sssd on Bionic:
The customer tested sssd from -updates, version 1.16.1-1ubuntu1.6 and
the package from -proposed, version 1.16.1-1ubuntu1.7.
Begins:
Before applying the patch [package from -proposed] I confirmed open
ports to our domain controllers using ss and grepping for the
Verification for sssd on Focal:
The customer tested sssd from -updates, version 2.2.3-3 and the package
from -proposed, version 2.2.3-3ubuntu0.1.
Begins:
I have successfully tested the [package from -proposed] on Ubuntu
20.04.1.
Before applying the patch [package from -proposed] I confirmed
Performing verification for Bionic.
Since Benjamin hasn't responded, I will try and verify the best I can.
I made a instance on AWS. I used a c5d.large instance type, and added
8gb extra EBS storage.
I installed the latest kernel from -updates to get a performance
baseline. kernel is
Performing verification for Bionic.
Since Benjamin hasn't responded, I will try and verify the best I can.
I made a instance on AWS. I used a c5d.large instance type, and added
8gb extra EBS storage.
I installed the latest kernel from -updates to get a performance
baseline. kernel is
Performing verification for Focal.
Since Benjamin hasn't responded, I will try and verify the best I can.
I made a instance on AWS. I used a c5d.large instance type, and added
8gb extra EBS storage.
I installed the latest kernel from -updates to get a performance
baseline. kernel is
Performing verification for Focal.
Since Benjamin hasn't responded, I will try and verify the best I can.
I made a instance on AWS. I used a c5d.large instance type, and added
8gb extra EBS storage.
I installed the latest kernel from -updates to get a performance
baseline. kernel is
Performing verification of adcli on Bionic
The patches for Bionic are a bit more involved, as it adds the whole
--use-ldaps ecosystem.
Firstly, I installed adcli 0.8.2-1 from -updates. The manpage did not
have any mention of --use-ldaps, and if I ran a command with --use-
ldaps, it would
Performing verification of adcli on Focal
The patches for Focal are a bit more involved, as it adds the whole
--use-ldaps ecosystem.
Firstly, I installed adcli 0.9.0-1 from -updates. The manpage did not
have any mention of --use-ldaps, and if I ran a command with --use-
ldaps, it would complain
Performing verification of adcli on Groovy.
Groovy only required one patch, which fixed a missed enablement of
--use-ldaps for the testjoin and update commands.
So, just testing those two.
I installed adcli 0.9.0-1ubuntu1 from -updates, and I set everything up
by issuing a join command. After
Hi Tobias, thanks for testing and verifying! I really appreciate it, and
it's good to hear that everything works.
I'll just add some of my own test output below, and we should be good to
go for a release to -updates in about a week's time.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Hi Benjamin,
The kernel team have built the next kernel update, and they have placed
it in -proposed for verification.
The versions are 4.15.0-125-generic for Bionic, and 5.4.0-55-generic for
Focal.
Can you please schedule a maintenance window for the Launchpad git
server, to install the new
Hi Benjamin,
The kernel team have built the next kernel update, and they have placed
it in -proposed for verification.
The versions are 4.15.0-125-generic for Bionic, and 5.4.0-55-generic for
Focal.
Can you please schedule a maintenance window for the Launchpad git
server, to install the new
Performing verification for Bionic.
I enabled -proposed and installed 4.15.0-125-generic to a i3.8xlarge AWS
instance.
>From there, I followed the testcase steps:
$ uname -rv
4.15.0-125-generic #128-Ubuntu SMP Mon Nov 9 20:51:00 UTC 2020
$ lsblk
NAMEMAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
xvda
Performing verification for Bionic.
I enabled -proposed and installed 4.15.0-125-generic to a i3.8xlarge AWS
instance.
>From there, I followed the testcase steps:
$ uname -rv
4.15.0-125-generic #128-Ubuntu SMP Mon Nov 9 20:51:00 UTC 2020
$ lsblk
NAMEMAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
xvda
Performing verification for Focal.
I enabled -proposed and installed 5.4.0-55-generic to a i3.8xlarge AWS
instance.
>From there, I followed the testcase steps:
$ uname -rv
5.4.0-55-generic #61-Ubuntu SMP Mon Nov 9 20:49:56 UTC 2020
$ lsblk
NAMEMAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
xvda
Performing verification for Focal.
I enabled -proposed and installed 5.4.0-55-generic to a i3.8xlarge AWS
instance.
>From there, I followed the testcase steps:
$ uname -rv
5.4.0-55-generic #61-Ubuntu SMP Mon Nov 9 20:49:56 UTC 2020
$ lsblk
NAMEMAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
xvda
Performing verification for Groovy.
I enabled -proposed and installed 5.8.0-30-generic to a i3.8xlarge AWS
instance.
>From there, I followed the testcase steps:
$ uname -rv
5.8.0-30-generic #32-Ubuntu SMP Mon Nov 9 21:03:15 UTC 2020
$ lsblk
NAMEMAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
xvda
Performing verification for Groovy.
I enabled -proposed and installed 5.8.0-30-generic to a i3.8xlarge AWS
instance.
>From there, I followed the testcase steps:
$ uname -rv
5.8.0-30-generic #32-Ubuntu SMP Mon Nov 9 21:03:15 UTC 2020
$ lsblk
NAMEMAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
xvda
Performing verification for Focal.
I created a i3.large instance on AWS, since it has 1x NVMe drive that
supports trim and block discard.
I ensured that I could reproduce the problem with 5.4.0-54-generic from
-updates, and I followed the instructions in the Testcase section, and
the final
Performing verification for Focal.
I created a i3.large instance on AWS, since it has 1x NVMe drive that
supports trim and block discard.
I ensured that I could reproduce the problem with 5.4.0-54-generic from
-updates, and I followed the instructions in the Testcase section, and
the final
** Description changed:
[Impact]
Microsoft has released a new security advisory for Active Directory (AD)
which outlines that man-in-the-middle attacks can be performed on a LDAP
server, such as AD DS, that works by an attacker forwarding an
authentication request to a Windows LDAP
** Description changed:
[Impact]
Microsoft has released a new security advisory for Active Directory (AD)
which outlines that man-in-the-middle attacks can be performed on a LDAP
server, such as AD DS, that works by an attacker forwarding an
authentication request to a Windows LDAP
> Thanks for the very detailed SRU template.
>
> On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 11:06 PM Matthew Ruffell
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Dan, Eric and Mauricio,
>>
>> Can you please review and consider sponsoring LP1868703 [1]?
>>
>> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868703
Attached is a revised debdiff for adcli for Focal.
** Patch added: "adcli debdiff for Focal v2"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1868703/+attachment/5432871/+files/lp1868703_adcli_focal_v2.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of STS
Attached is a revised debdiff for adcli for Focal.
** Patch added: "adcli debdiff for Focal v2"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1868703/+attachment/5432871/+files/lp1868703_adcli_focal_v2.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Attached is a revised debdiff for adcli in Bionic.
** Patch added: "adcli debdiff for Bionic v2"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1868703/+attachment/5432874/+files/lp1868703_adcli_bionic_v2.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Attached is a debdiff for adcli in Groovy.
** Patch added: "adcli debdiff for groovy"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1868703/+attachment/5432870/+files/lp1868703_adcli_groovy.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Attached is a debdiff for adcli for Hirsute.
** Patch added: "adcli debdiff for hirsute"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1868703/+attachment/5432869/+files/lp1868703_adcli_hirsute.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Attached is a revised debdiff for adcli in Bionic.
** Patch added: "adcli debdiff for Bionic v2"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1868703/+attachment/5432874/+files/lp1868703_adcli_bionic_v2.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of STS
Attached is a debdiff for adcli for Hirsute.
** Patch added: "adcli debdiff for hirsute"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1868703/+attachment/5432869/+files/lp1868703_adcli_hirsute.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of STS
Sponsors,
Attached is a debdiff for adcli in Groovy.
** Patch added: "adcli debdiff for groovy"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1868703/+attachment/5432870/+files/lp1868703_adcli_groovy.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of STS
Sponsors, which
Attached is a revised debdiff for sssd for Bionic.
** Patch added: "sssd debdiff for Bionic v2"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1868703/+attachment/5432867/+files/lp1868703_sssd_bionic_v2.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Attached is a revised debdiff for sssd for Bionic.
** Patch added: "sssd debdiff for Bionic v2"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1868703/+attachment/5432867/+files/lp1868703_sssd_bionic_v2.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of STS
Attached is a revised debdiff for sssd for Focal.
** Patch added: "sssd debdiff for Focal v2"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1868703/+attachment/5432866/+files/lp1868703_sssd_focal_v2.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of STS
Attached is a revised debdiff for sssd for Focal.
** Patch added: "sssd debdiff for Focal v2"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1868703/+attachment/5432866/+files/lp1868703_sssd_focal_v2.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Patch removed: "adcli debdiff for Focal"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1868703/+attachment/5432450/+files/lp1868703_adcli_focal.debdiff
** Patch removed: "sssd debdiff for Focal"
** Patch removed: "adcli debdiff for Focal"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1868703/+attachment/5432450/+files/lp1868703_adcli_focal.debdiff
** Patch removed: "sssd debdiff for Focal"
901 - 1000 of 2037 matches
Mail list logo
