Re: Mock build Fedora package on CentOS 7

On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 12:08, Ian Pilcher wrote: > > Is $SUBJECT possible these days? > > I've tried with both --bootstrap-chroot and --use-bootstrap-image, but > the build is failing with: > >ERROR: builddep command missing. >Please install package dnf-plugins-core. > > This happens even

Fedora Infrastructure Weekly meeting agenda (2020-01-16)

## Preamble The infrastructure team will be having its weekly meeting tomorrow, 2020-01-16 at 15:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on the freenode network. We have a document at https://board.net/p/fedora-infra Please try and review and edit that document before the meeting and we will use it to have

Re: How to obsolede module?

On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 07:55, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 6:01 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 05:21:40AM -0500, Josef Ridky wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > Does anyone know, how can I obsolete modular version of package? > > > > > > TL;DR > > > > > > I

Re: Let's talk about Fedora in the '20s!

On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 03:05, Benson Muite wrote: > > >> Thank you for the PDF. However, the presentation is sightly outdated > >> given the listed hardware dating from 2008. Some modern laptops are > >> equipped with a IR camera Windows Hello type device which could be > >> suitable for iris

Re: What would it take to drop release and changelog from our spec files? (and do we want to?)

On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 15:23, Joe Doss wrote: > > On 1/12/20 3:19 PM, Marius Schwarz wrote: > > Am 10.01.20 um 17:36 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon: > >> Good Morning Everyone, > >> > >> This is not a new idea, it has been presented at flock last year and > spoken > >> about on this very list this

Re: [CentOS] ssh failure from CentOS7 to Centos6

On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 12:23, Patrick Bégou wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a strange problem with a freshly installed Centos7 desktop > (most8pc25). I can't ssh to 2 CentOS6 servers, even with firewall > disabled on the client and on the server. But I can connect from the > server to the client, all

[EPEL-devel] Re: Software Collection packages for EPEL

On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 12:13, Dmitry Butskoy wrote: > > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >>> OK we are now syncing to rhel-7-server-devtools-rpms and those have > >>> the needed rust-toolset, llvm-toolset and other tools which someone > >>> needing to rebuild chromium or seamonkey. Please test and let me

[EPEL-devel] Re: Software Collection packages for EPEL

On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 16:13, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 16:07, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 15:53, Dmitry Butskoy wrote: > > > > > > Considering how Firefox is built, I see it uses: > > > de

[EPEL-devel] Re: Pound in EPEL 8

On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 04:06, Felix Schwarz wrote: > > > Am 09.01.20 um 00:03 schrieb Breno Brand Fernandes: > > It seems that the package was retired on 2019-02-11[1]. > > I think you need to follow the general un-retirement procedure: >

Re: Lagging system with latest kernels

On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 07:37, Jan Grulich wrote: > > I did some search again. It looks many other distributions (Ubuntu, Arch, > Manjaro) have this issue as well. Users report this as a regression since > kernel 4.2. Some suggested to disable swap, which makes this problem go away > for them. I'm

[EPEL-devel] Re: Software Collection packages for EPEL

On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 16:07, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 15:53, Dmitry Butskoy wrote: > > > > Considering how Firefox is built, I see it uses: > > devtoolset-8 > > rust-toolset-1.35 > > llvm-toolset-7.0 > > > > I t

[EPEL-devel] Re: Software Collection packages for EPEL

On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 15:53, Dmitry Butskoy wrote: > > Considering how Firefox is built, I see it uses: > devtoolset-8 > rust-toolset-1.35 > llvm-toolset-7.0 > > I try to build new SeaMonkey-2.53 (formerly Mozilla, Netscape), it has > code based on Firefox and requires the same toolsets under

[EPEL-devel] Re: How to deal with dependencies from Power Tools repo

On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 11:14, Richard Shaw wrote: > > I have build BackupPC for EPEL 8 and got a few of the dependencies in EPEL as > well that aren't provided by the base repo. > > One of the dependencies is provided by the Power Tools repo, but when trying > to install of course it just gives

Outage for 2020-01-15: Fedora Prod Environment

#8506 Planned Outage - Fedoraproject.org - 2020-01-15 21:00 UTC Opened a day ago by smooge. Modified a day ago Open Planned Outage - Fedoraproject.org - 2020-01-15 21:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2020-01-15 21:00UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your

Outage for 2020-01-15: Fedora Prod Environment

#8506 Planned Outage - Fedoraproject.org - 2020-01-15 21:00 UTC Opened a day ago by smooge. Modified a day ago Open Planned Outage - Fedoraproject.org - 2020-01-15 21:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2020-01-15 21:00UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your

Outage for 2020-01-14: Fedora Build Environment

8505 Planned Outage - Fedora Build Systems - 2020-01-14 21:00 UTC Opened a day ago by smooge. Modified 2 minutes ago Open Planned Outage - Fedora Build Systems - 2020-01-14 21:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2020-01-14 21:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC

Outage for 2020-01-15: Fedora Prod Environment

#8506 Planned Outage - Fedoraproject.org - 2020-01-15 21:00 UTC Opened a day ago by smooge. Modified a day ago Open Planned Outage - Fedoraproject.org - 2020-01-15 21:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2020-01-15 21:00UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your

Outage for 2020-01-14: Fedora Build Environment

8505 Planned Outage - Fedora Build Systems - 2020-01-14 21:00 UTC Opened a day ago by smooge. Modified 2 minutes ago Open Planned Outage - Fedora Build Systems - 2020-01-14 21:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2020-01-14 21:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC

Outage for 2020-01-13: Fedora Infrastructure Staging Environment

#8504 Planned Outage - Fedora Staging - 2020-01-13 21:00 UTC Opened a day ago by smooge. Modified 4 hours ago Open There will be an outage starting at 2020-01-13 21:00UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at

Outage for 2020-01-13: Fedora Infrastructure Staging Environment

#8504 Planned Outage - Fedora Staging - 2020-01-13 21:00 UTC Opened a day ago by smooge. Modified 4 hours ago Open There will be an outage starting at 2020-01-13 21:00UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at

Reinstalling pkgs01.stg.fedoraproject.org from scratch

The pkgs01.stg system has been used for a lot of little projects in the past year which has made it diverge from production in multiple ways. Normally, we would regularly reinstall pkgs01.stg and then import source code from the production system. This would mean all work on pkgs01.stg would be

Re: [CentOS] Network Diagnostics

On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 at 08:22, Chris Olson via CentOS wrote: > > In our smallest office, we have a Dell CentOS 7 system, a > Windows system and an HP 8610 printer, all hard-wire Ethernet > connected with a Linksys router. The router provides Internet > connection. All of the network-connected

Re: Looking to deprecate service: boot.fedoraproject.org

On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 at 11:58, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 11:44:57AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > We are looking to turn off the boot.fedoraproject.org servers. These > > were a technology which worked about a decade ago but the upstream we >

Looking to deprecate service: boot.fedoraproject.org

We are looking to turn off the boot.fedoraproject.org servers. These were a technology which worked about a decade ago but the upstream we are using is dead and the current version we have deployed has been 'broken' for a good many people for over 2 years due to TLS changes and such. A tracking

Re: rsync and ls -lR slow for directories with many files

On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 at 17:16, wrote: > > I am running rsync on a small linux server to synchronize files in one > directory and its subdirectories from Windows (using sshd from Cygwin) to > this server for backup purposes. The directory contains almost 1 TB of images > and videos in about 160k

[EPEL-devel] Re: Self Introduction: Michal Bocek

Welcome. I think everyone is on the usual Red Hat 2 week break at the end of the year.. but I will try to look at this when I get back. On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 14:44, mbocek wrote: > > Hi, I've been working at Red Hat mainly on tools dealing with upgrades > of major versions of RHEL. I've also

[EPEL-devel] Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Co

On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 13:07, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > This meeting is cancelled. I was not able to cancel the meetings > without doing all of them. > It really really helps if you are logged into the website to cancel the meetings. We will not get any more emails un

[EPEL-devel] Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Co

On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 13:30, Andrew C Aitchison wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Dec 2019, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > This meeting is cancelled. I was not able to cancel the meetings > > without doing all of them. > > I assume that the meeting next week is also cancelle

[EPEL-devel] Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Co

This meeting is cancelled. I was not able to cancel the meetings without doing all of them. On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 13:00, wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >EPEL Steering Co on 2019-12-18 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT >At freenode@fedora-meeting > > The

Re: [CentOS] systemctl behaves like it is being piped to less in centos 8?

On Fri, 13 Dec 2019 at 11:40, Warren Young wrote: > > On Dec 13, 2019, at 9:27 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > It seems this became the default at some point. > > > > systemctl -l --no-pager > > > > is the way to get it without that. The whol

Re: [CentOS] systemctl behaves like it is being piped to less in centos 8?

On Fri, 13 Dec 2019 at 11:11, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > > Comparing the output of systemctl between centos 7 and 8: > > [root@mail ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release > CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core) > [root@mail ~]# systemctl status firewalld > ● firewalld.service - firewalld - dynamic firewall

[EPEL-devel] Re: hitch is broken in epel7, fix in fedora may or may not break production systems (bz #1731420)

On Thu, 12 Dec 2019 at 05:28, Matthew Blissett wrote: > > On 13/11/2019 20:44, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 17:06, Ingvar Hagelund > > wrote: > >> Hello > >> > >> hitch is a TLS terminating network proxy, made to be

[EPEL-devel] Re: Python 3.7 in EPEL?

On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 at 17:23, Fred Gleason wrote: > > On Dec 11, 2019, at 12:50, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > The issue is that most 'users' of the language do not see a difference > between the 2. When they say python3x they mean > python3x+whatever-bits-i-needed. So

[EPEL-devel] Re: Python 3.7 in EPEL?

On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 at 11:44, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 11. 12. 19 17:01, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 at 20:24, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > >> Hey EPEL people. > >> > >> We got a request to branch Python 3.7 foe EPEL 7: &g

[EPEL-devel] Re: Python 3.7 in EPEL?

On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 at 20:24, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hey EPEL people. > > We got a request to branch Python 3.7 foe EPEL 7: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781940 > > Are there volunteers to make that effort? And if so, should this be done in > EPEL > 8 first? And what about

Re: Issue with Fedora GeoIP service

On Fri, 6 Dec 2019 at 11:41, Martin Kolman wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-12-06 at 08:38 -0600, Chris Adams wrote: > > When installing Fedora 31 on a system, I noticed that anaconda defaulted > > to US/Pacific for the time zone, rather than the correct US/Central. > > I'm on a Google Fiber connection,

Re: [CentOS] VPN connections subject to hijack attack

On Fri, 6 Dec 2019 at 04:40, Kenneth Porter wrote: > > > Thanks for the heads up > This affects all VPNs and is a consequence of using "loose" reverse path > filtering for

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 and libssh2.h

On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 at 11:57, Jerry Geis wrote: > > I am trying to find libssh2.h > > In the past I installed libssh2-devel > > I have libssh2 installed. I have tried > > yum install libssh2-devel - nothing found > yum provides "*/libssh2.h" - nothing found > yum search libssh2.h - nothing found.

Re: [CentOS] IBM x3500 M3 and CentOS 7.*

On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 at 17:05, Mark (Netbook) wrote: > > Hello, > > Please can anyone help with the problem below when trying to install CentOS > 7.6 on an IBM x3500 M3 from DVD or USB. > > CentOS 7.5 installs perfectly with no errors. > I would try one more thing. Install CentOS-7.5 and then

Re: [CentOS] yum4 and dnf on CentOS 8

On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 at 15:39, Sergio Belkin wrote: > > Hi, > > I was using yum for years on CentOS servers, and since a few years ago dnf > on Fedora desktops. My question is: > Is the same yum4 on CentOS 8 that dnf? What should I use? > Thanks in advance > yum4 is a thin wrapper on dnf mainly

Re: [CentOS] sendmail on Centos 7.7

On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 at 08:22, Jerry Geis wrote: > > Hi All, > > I am 'trying' to set SMART_HOST in sendmail to point to smtp-relay.gmail.com > but when looking at the /var/log/maillog its going to mx203.inbound-mx.net. > [192.110.255.243], > That is weird.. and from all the other posts I could

Meeting agenda for 2019-11-21

The infrastructure team will be having its weekly meeting tomorrow, 2019-11-21 at 15:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on the freenode network. We have a document at https://board.net/p/fedora-infra Please try and review and edit that document before the meeting and we will use it to have our agenda of

Re: What's the State of the Java SIG?

On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 at 10:25, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > Your comments on what you expect OTHER people to do for YOU come across as > > we are all your slaves or serfs. I really expect that isn't your > > intention, but this mode of

Re: What's the State of the Java SIG?

On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 22:07, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > I see that Mikolaj has a vision how it supposed to work. And I think he > > spent quite some time designing the workflow which would fit this vision, > > thus it is worth to listen to it with an open mind. > > >

Re: [fedora-java] What's the State of the Java SIG?

On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 09:17, Gerald Henriksen wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:08:02 -0800, you wrote: > > >On 11/18/19 7:29 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> I can't speak for everyone, but at least my experience was that it was > >> functionally impossible to discover how to package Java stuff. In a

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 boot command line

On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 15:22, Jerry Geis wrote: > > > ip=192.168.1.13::192.168.1.1:255.255.255.0:hostname.goes.here:eth0:on:1500: > > Thanks for the information. > > What "insanity". Take a perfectly good syntax and muck it up like that. The > developer that "lost" backward compatibility for that

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 boot command line

On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 14:05, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > > > On 2019-11-18 12:45, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 13:22, Jerry Geis wrote: > >> > >> I am trying to boot a grub entry for CentOS 8 > >> > >> menuentry &q

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 boot command line

On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 13:22, Jerry Geis wrote: > > I am trying to boot a grub entry for CentOS 8 > > menuentry "Server Install CentOS 8" { >linux /boot/vmlinuz noverifyssl ks= > https://devgeis.LayeredSolutionsInc.com:443/kickstart/ks_update_to_server8.cfg > biosdevname=0

[EPEL-devel] Re: How do I remove packages from epel-playground only

On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 09:55, Troy Dawson wrote: > > Hi, > This has come up in multiple conversations, with no answer. > Honestly I don't think we ever came up with an idea of anything getting retired in playground.. so that is the 'answer'. We need to figure this out. > With modularity coming

Re: which old version of fedora can read a old iRIX XFS filesystem ?

On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 at 21:13, J. Scheurich wrote: > > Hi, > > When trying to mount a old SGI IRIX64 XFS filesystem, current Linux > versions complain with: > There are going to be a bunch of problems trying to mount this depending on how old the partition is: https://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 05:08, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Hello, > > I think we've managed to create a bit of confusion here, so I thought > I'd clarify it. > > For cases where an individual requests wikiedit access only to edit the > wiki (as in the recent case of @abolgna[1]), will infra please

Re: [CentOS] C8 Questions

On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 at 11:12, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > > Hi all, > I've several questions about C8. I'm using 8 on my personal NAS and > works very well. I'm running several VMs with centos 8 and noticed > something: > OK most of these questions are going to be answered by the fact that CentOS

[EPEL-devel] Re: hitch is broken in epel7, fix in fedora may or may not break production systems (bz #1731420)

On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 17:06, Ingvar Hagelund wrote: > > Hello > > hitch is a TLS terminating network proxy, made to be lean and mean and do > nothing else than terminating TLS. It fits hand-in-glove with varnish cache. > I maintain hitch in Fedora and EPEL. > > There is a bug in the current

Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread

On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 15:36, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 12:40 PM Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: > > > > On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 12:26, Aleksandra Fedorova > > wrote: > > > Again I fail to see the _technical_ difference

Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread

On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 12:26, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 5:10 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > On 12. 11. 19 17:02, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > > Again, no one forces you or any other packager to use modularity > > > tooling right now. > > > > > > As Fedora developer

Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread

On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 09:49, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 12. 11. 19 v 14:04 Aleksandra Fedorova napsal(a): > > Hi, > > > > > 2) I don't think Modularity is a failure in its current state. > > > > Yes, we do have a problem of default streams. There are several > > reasons for that. > > > > One

Re: Another patch that makes nagios send the messages with fedora-messaging

will do so. On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 08:58, Karsten Hopp wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > > Thanks a lot for reviewing this. > > As I don't have write access afaik, could you merge that into the repo, > please ? > > Thanks, Karsten > > Am 11.11.19 um 20:37 schrieb Ste

Re: Another patch that makes nagios send the messages with fedora-messaging

Looks good to me as the nagios person On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 at 11:05, Karsten Hopp wrote: > > It helps when patches are attached ;-( > > > Am 09.11.19 um 01:43 schrieb Karsten Hopp: > > Hi all, > > Now that https://pagure.io/releng/pull-request/8940 got merged we can > > migrate nagios from

Re: Mirrorlist server bug report - behaviour change requested

On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 at 08:15, Adrian Reber wrote: > > I was contacted by someone working on openSUSE's Open Build System > (OBS). They are using download.fedoraproject.org and some layout change > concerning noarch breaks their workflow. The problem is, that the > redirect service of

Re: [CentOS] cli Checking disk i/o

On Sun, 10 Nov 2019 at 17:12, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > I just built a CentOS7 system on a Zotac NANO PC. > > I used a 320GB 2.5" HD I had sitting around and installed with Standard > Partitions on XFS. > > The drive is spinning, nonstop. I would check the NANO to see if its firmware has any

Re: [CentOS] Need help modding src.rpms to generate complete SAMBA AD DC binary RPMs for CentOS 8

On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 at 01:13, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote: > > When RHEL8 and CentOS8 were released, I was looking forward to setting > up SAMBA as a AD DC server for CentOS8. But when I lifed the hood on > the samba.spec file I found the option to build the samba-dc binary rpm > has

Re: EPEL-8 builds

On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 12:29, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 04:48:41PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 4:36 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > > > > Dne 07. 11. 19 v 11:12 Peter Robinson napsal(a): > > > > I'd like to know why people are pushing EPEL-8 builds

Re: EPEL-8 builds

On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 05:13, Peter Robinson wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to know why people are pushing EPEL-8 builds without engaging > with the maintainers of the packages. I've had a few packages where > I'm the only maintainer and I've explicitly not built them for EPEL-8 > for reasons yet

Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread

On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 10:24, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 03:35, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > On 11/5/19 9:41 PM, Alex Scheel wrote: > > > > > IMO, without a resolution in Fedora we'll never get one in RHEL. > > > > And?

Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread

On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 03:35, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On 11/5/19 9:41 PM, Alex Scheel wrote: > > > IMO, without a resolution in Fedora we'll never get one in RHEL. > > And? Why should Fedora care about RHEL? > > I for one consider RHEL not to be its partner, but it to be an > initiative to

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL Steering Committee Request: Allow minizip-compat

On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 06:02, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Monday, 04 November 2019 at 23:38, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 5:26 PM Stephen John Smoogen > > wrote: > > > > > > So I started to review > > > https://bugz

[EPEL-devel] Re: What to do about old packages in epel8-playground

On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 18:35, Dave Dykstra wrote: > > It seems to be worse than that. When I tried around 2 weeks ago, > building a version in epel8-playground blocked building the same version > in epel8. > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8925 > I did similar builds earlier and didn't have

Re: Encrypted DNS in Fedora

On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 at 09:51, Marius Schwarz wrote: > > Am 05.11.19 um 15:17 schrieb Florian Weimer: > > I categorically reject your notion that you can increase privacy by > > sending queries to more servers. As a result, you will end up with a > > larger set of servers you must trust, not a

[EPEL-devel] EPEL Steering Committee Request: Allow minizip-compat

So I started to review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767883 which is a package which is normally in the zlib package but has been commented out from shipping on RHEL-8. It is needed for chromium and other items so Tom Callaway has made up a package for it. However the naming

Re: Encrypted DNS in Fedora

On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 11:44, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > Hi, > > Is there any project or team involved with improving encrypted DNS support in > Fedora? Any movement in Red Hat corporate? > > - Glibc team? > The /etc/resolv.conf file needs some love. AFAIK it still does not > verify

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 11:04, wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-10-29 at 16:36 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > There are 233 people in the group > > Are you sure? > I can count 118. > Maybe it is due to some privacy setting? > I must have double

Re: ask.fedoraproject.org - redirects?

On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 at 16:22, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > I do not disagree with you on this. I also know we don't have a larger > > number of system administrators, servers and time to do all the things > > many community members 'expect a p

Re: ask.fedoraproject.org - redirects?

On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 at 14:29, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 03. 11. 19 20:24, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hero maintenance > > I don't normally correct my typos on mailing lists to avoid further e-mails, > but > this one is particularly bad. I meant "zero" of course. Sorry about that. > I was going for

Re: ask.fedoraproject.org - redirects?

On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 at 12:50, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > These systems are not small tasks to keep up and running.. the > > upstream code is not 'static' or backportable so you are constantly > > updating to upstream to keep up with CVE

Re: ask.fedoraproject.org - redirects?

On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 at 05:33, Miro Hrončok wrote: > IMHO It should give the useres the new full link. > > If that would not be possible, maybe it could read: > > "Oh no, this page is not here. Try replacing ask.fedoraproject.org with > askbot.fedoraproject.org to get archived content of this

Re: ask.fedoraproject.org - redirects?

On Sat, 2 Nov 2019 at 14:03, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > James Cassell wrote: > > When I asked, the answer was that it costs money to do custom redirects, > > and the old site is going away "soon" so it would be overcome by events > > sooner or later. > > This just shows how bad an idea it is to rely

Re: What is the purpose of my "...@fedoraproject.org" email address?

On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 at 14:59, Álvaro Castillo wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 6:05 PM Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 at 12:59, Álvaro Castillo >> wrote: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> &g

Re: What is the purpose of my "...@fedoraproject.org" email address?

d that. > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 4:13 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> >> The account listed in previous emails is currently only a member of >> the base groups: Approved Groups: cla_done cla_fpca . Aliases are >> added only after you have been accepted into anothe

Re: Unresponsive maintainer: smooge Fwd: [Bug 1451148] libmaxminddb-1.3.2 is available

On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 at 12:52, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 11:46:41AM -0400, Jason Taylor wrote: > > I am interested in this package as well, I can help maintain it (fas: > > jtaylor) > > Is there an easy command-line query tool for this package, like there was > for the old

Re: What is the purpose of my "...@fedoraproject.org" email address?

The account listed in previous emails is currently only a member of the base groups: Approved Groups: cla_done cla_fpca . Aliases are added only after you have been accepted into another group. On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 at 10:43, Chris Rainey wrote: > > OK. Thanks. Maybe temporarily out-of-service or

Re: What is the purpose of my "...@fedoraproject.org" email address?

On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 at 10:19, Chris Rainey wrote: > > I just noticed that my FAS account has an automatic(?) @fedoraproject.org > email address. Is there an "Inbox" for this or is it just an alias to my > "Primary" account address for privacy, etc.? > It isn't automatic but is 'awarded' after

Re: Official font

On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 at 11:59, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > Hi all, > > I incidentally discovered today that, since quite recently, there's a > Red Hat font [1]. And this led me to think about the popularity of the > Ubuntu font, you know, and how nice would be to have a nice catchy > official Fedora

Re: [CentOS] Help with CentOS 7 and nvidia

On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 at 09:29, Jerry Geis wrote: > > Hello my hardware has: > 03:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GT218 [ION] (rev a2) > My initial guess would be that Nvidia dropped full support for a ~10 year old card. They usually only focus on the last 5 years and drop

Re: [ansible-project] Ansible is totally broken after a OS upgrade

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 17:17, 'Mark Tovey - DSV' via Ansible Project wrote: > > > So today I ran a playbook on our Ansible server that is still running > RedHat 7.6 and I saw the issue again. Through experimenting, I finally > traced it to setting "ANSIBLE_STDOUT_CALLBACK=yaml" before

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 16:16, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 14:51:04 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 14:37, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > > > > > > But I think the *existence* of this group is still > > &g

Re: FBR bodhi-pungi: only run multi-arch SB on f31+

+1 .. now I found it. On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 14:19, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > I didn't see anything patched on there so I am not sure what to review. > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 09:49, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > > [PATCH] bodhi-pungi: only

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 14:37, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > But I think the *existence* of this group is still > > valid. > > Sure, so we leave things as they are now as far as wikiedit is > concerned. > > The Fedora Join process should help reduce the number of wikiedit > membership requests, but

Re: FBR bodhi-pungi: only run multi-arch SB on f31+

I didn't see anything patched on there so I am not sure what to review. On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 09:49, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > [PATCH] bodhi-pungi: only run multi-arch SB on f31+ > ___ > infrastructure mailing list --

Re: [ansible-project] Ansible is totally broken after a OS upgrade

On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 16:08, 'Mark Tovey' via Ansible Project wrote: > > > I just performed a OS upgrade on our Ansible server from RedHat 7.6 to > RedHat 7.7, and now Ansible has become unusable. When I try to run any task > that uses any Ansible fact, I get the following error: > >

Re: Fedora Modularity: What's the Problem?

On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 15:21, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:16 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Thank you for this very useful summary. > > > > One general problem with the thinking behind this is that it applies much > > more > > to CentOS or

Re: Fedora Modularity: What's the Problem?

On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 14:38, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:16 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > > > *Requirement*: It must be possible for the packager to specify the order > > > in > > > which packages must be built (and to indicate which ones can be built

Re: FBR: Change IoT devel/ keys to f31

+1 to the change. On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 10:00, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 1:42 PM Patrick Uiterwijk > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Can I get +1s for the following patch? > > Appart from devel in the subject the patch is correct so +1 from me. > > P > > > Regards, > >

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 08:43, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > Hello, > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 00:16:13 +0200, alcir...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hello! > > > > As you can read here[0], the Fedora Join SIG is experimenting a new way > > to help people become part of the community. > > > > This workflow

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 8 rpm file

This file was a manually created symlink to the 8/Everything/x86_64/Packages/e/epel-release-8-6.el8.noarch.rpm When the -8 version got pushed to EPEL, this caused the old one to go away and the symlink to break. I have made this a hard link so that when the file gets iterated in the future, the

Re: [CentOS] HW update. Fedora 30 to Centos?

On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 at 10:14, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 03:53:49PM +0100, Dave Pawson wrote: > > Not all that bothered about being 'up to the minute', and after > > 20+ Fedora installs it does get to be a drag... > > You should be just fine with CentOS for most cases.

Re: [CentOS] ls permissions format changed in CentOS 8

On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 at 20:14, Kenneth Porter wrote: > > Found it. It happens from the process buffer inside Lugaru Epsilon. I think > ls thinks it's doing a DIRED output instead of a shell output. Now I need > to figure out why it thinks that. This wasn't happening in CentOS 7. > Lugaru Epsilon?

Re: [CentOS] Centos 8 - no freeIPA servers

On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 at 09:52, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > > On 25/10/2019 14:46, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > > hi, anybody knows why? > > > > many thanks, L. > > > > ___ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS@centos.org > >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 apcupsd or nut and duplicity

On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 15:41, Ian P. wrote: > > It looks like Fedora 28 is past EOL and I am not able to locate a > source for package downloads. > It is past EOL, but it is available at a few mirrors. They mirror a lot of content so it would be slower and may be better if you are going to use

Re: FBR: Update koji-sidetag-plugin on Koji hub

+1 and thank you On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 09:31, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > In order to fix issue 8322 [1] python2-koji-sidetag-plugin-hub needs > to be updated. This would be done with the following commands: > > $ koji move epel7-infra-stg epel7-infra koji-sidetag-plugin-0.1-2.el7.infra > >

Re: FBR: F31 Final is GO, bodhi config changes

+1 On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 14:04, Clement Verna wrote: > > > > On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 19:57, Mohan Boddu wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Now that F31 is GO, I would like the make the necessary changes to >> bodhi configs. >> >> "vars/all/Frozen.yaml" 1L, 15C written >> [mohanboddu@batcave01

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >