Re: [Debconf-team] DC16 web pages: Sponsor page and logos
On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 09:34:30PM -0500, Brian Gupta wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Raoul Snymanwrote: > > On 29/10/2015 18:32, Daniel Lange wrote: > >> we have the first sponsor DC16 now (yeah!) and I've added the logo to the > >> git.debian.org/git/debconf-team/logos repro. > >> > >> Who wants to make a sponsors-page on the current static site and add > >> them as the first silver sponsor? > >> (You design it, you decide on logo sizes and convert to .odg to .png, > >> .svg or whatever please.) > > > > I'll take a look at this tonight. > > Thank you for looking into this. Did you have any luck? (We've now got > a second committed sponsor.) He did: http://debconf16.debconf.org/sponsors.html -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] Collaboratively drafting the next DebConf delegation
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 08:49:31AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 19/10/15 at 22:49 +0200, Daniel Lange wrote: > > Dear team, > So, the way I understand it, this proposal does three things: > > 2) move the chairs selection process from designation by the DPL to > election by the DebConf team. If I'm understanding the draft correctly, there would be initial appointments by the DPL for terms of 2 and 3 years. Then subsequently elections would be held when those terms expire or a delegate resigns. What is the rationale for this mix of appointment and election? I think that I prefer an election. I have understood some of the conflict between the past chairs and debconf-team to have arisen out of a sense that the choice of chairs was imposed from above. Preferring an election, I don't want to wait 2 & 3 years for a chance to vote. It doesn't make much sense to me at the moment to try to have it both ways. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
[Debconf-team] Deadline (Re: Collaboratively drafting the next DebConf delegation)
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:49:11PM +0200, Daniel Lange wrote: > Dear team, > Please contribute your ideas / changes / amendments within the next two > or three weeks. Edrz extended the deadline to 16.11.2015 so that we > should have sufficient time for discussion. I hope that we can come up > with one joint proposal for a delegation letter draft for the DPL from > DebConf as a whole. It's impossible for me to have extended a deadline that had not yet been announced. I don't consider it appropriate for the drafters to set a deadline nor for me to do so. Daniel mentioned the titanpad draft yesterday on irc around 20:30 UTC. AFAIK this was the first public mention that a draft was in progress. The titanpad timeline shows it has been discussed at least since 2015-10-08. By version 42 we have mention of a private email from Bernelle: https://titanpad.com/ep/pad/view/DC16-draft-delegation-proposal/rev.42 Before that it is impossible to tell how long this has been in the works. An undisclosed group have been corresponding in private about this draft for at least 12 days _and_ proposed to give anyone they excluded only 2 weeks to respond, contribute or create a counter proposal. You have given yourselves an unfair head start on anyone who might disagree with you. I objected to the 2 weeks and was told "it's a titanpad, change it" so I added 2 weeks, which is my sole contribution. Maybe 4 weeks from now is fine, maybe it's too long, maybe it's not long enough. A deadline needs to be set, but not by me and not by the drafters. -edrz (more to come in separate mails about transparancy and the actual substance of the draft(s)) ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] website presence meeting: crunch time.
On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 07:49:06PM +0200, Bernelle Verster wrote: > Hi all > May I suggest Wednesday 18:00 UTC just because I see no other > alternative. Please feel free to suggest another day/time. > > * Can we get an idea for what is in the running, and who is driving it? > Systems intended to show convincing argument by deadline, and lead > person driving it: > wafer (hodgestar) > odoo? (madduck?) > (edrz?) I'm not driving anything. > (Modify as appropriate on the titanpad, not in the email thread) Done. > * Then I put the advantages and disadvantages for each 'contender'. > The way this is written feels very battle-like, which is not (really) > intended. If you have another way of summarising this, please go ahead > (a table in a wiki?) The point is that at the meeting I don't want to > go through all of this, it should be clear by then. Wafer seems to have the momentum, so its ok with me if we skip the battle and just figure out who's going to do what to make wafer work for DC16 (and beyond). -Eric ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] Timeline: Registration, Content
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 04:09:15PM +0200, Bernelle Verster wrote: > Hi all > > I'd like to get the content for registration going, as well as the > timeline dates , some jottings at [1]. > > We need info on "speaking (topics, deadlines, type of talk) " now > already as sponsors may be interested in this too, and I'm guessing > it's not too different from previous years - who is generally in > charge of this? https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/Teams#Content_team > Can I start a draft for comment? > > This is also useful for website content. > > Cheers > B > > [1] - https://debconf16-capetown.titanpad.com/2 -Eric ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
[Debconf-team] Scheduling web meeting Re: DebConf meetings this week
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:17:23AM +0200, Bernelle Verster wrote: > Hi all > 3. Website chatting on #debconf-infra, list discussion topics on titanpad > (e.g. > [1]) > 3. The website meeting is next week, may I suggest it replaces the weekly > meeting next week - aka Wednesday 30 Sept, 19:00 UTC? Until then can all > issues > get raised on #debconf-infra and documented on the titanpad [1], so the > meeting > can just recap and reach decisions? Like the coord meeting, attendance is not > compulsory but all are welcome. > > [1] - https://titanpad.com/443gTylF6p PyConZA [1] is 1 & 2 October. I wonder if that might make it hard for those involved in or attending that event to have time for a DebConf meeting on 30 Sept. I tried to look though the dudle to get an idea of a time and date that would work for most of those who have expressed interest, but the interface is rather ungainly. I'll try again tomorrow with fresher eyes if no one else has gotten to it. But, is there a way to clone the poll in order to remove those who aren't interested? (Or do we need a new poll?) -Eric [1] https://za.pycon.org/ ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf meetings this week
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 12:16:11PM +0200, Bernelle Verster wrote: > I hope in due course we can make these meeting notifications smoother, > suggestions welcome. Perhaps listing what's scheduled for the next 2 weeks would help. -Eric ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] Scheduling DC16 meetings
(I didn't get Tassia's mail below for some reason ...) On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 09:26:34AM +0200, Bernelle Verster wrote: > Hi all > > I would suggest those who can, join in the meeting. Ok. > Regards > B > > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015, Tassia Camoes Araujo <tas...@acaia.ca> > wrote: > Hi Eric, > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:24:06AM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: > > We could have a meeting tomorrow, but attendance is often low when a > > meeting is announced on such short notice. I would suggest trying to > > settle on a schedule today, then set and announce the next meeting for > > next week. > I see your point, but this is not a new meeting. I didn't understand that. Sorry and nevermind. :) > DC16 meetings are already > happening weekly since before DC15, this new dudle aims to access the > wider > team availability since now more people are expected to attend. But I'd > say > that in the absence of a new schedule, the old one holds (which actually > happens to be the same). Thus I see no reason to postpone tomorrow's > meeting. > More people will join when they are ready, if not this week, the next one, > or later in the year. > > These are my 2 cents, let's see what Bernelle and Stefano have to say. -Eric ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] Scheduling DC16 meetings
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 09:28:00AM -0400, Tassia Camoes Araujo wrote: > Hi Eric, > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 08:27:58AM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: > > > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015, Tassia Camoes Araujo > > > <tas...@acaia.ca> wrote: Hi Eric, On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at > > > 10:24:06AM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: > > > > We could have a meeting tomorrow, but attendance is often > > > > low when a meeting is announced on such short notice. I > > > > would suggest trying to settle on a schedule today, then set > > > > and announce the next meeting for next week. > > > I see your point, but this is not a new meeting. > > I didn't understand that. Sorry and nevermind. :) > Sorry, English is not my best friend that late at night ;-) No worries. > I was just trying to contrast this with the situation where we need to > find a convenient time for an adhoc ("new") meeting. In the present > case the meetings were already happening, we were just re-evaluating > the time. That's why I don't think it is "short notice". Otherwise I > would agree with you, short notice calls are usually problematic. Yes, I understand now. -Eric ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] Scheduling DC16 meetings
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 12:54:48PM +0200, Bernelle Verster wrote: > It looks like Wednesdays 19:00 UTC (21:00 SAST/local event time) still > seems good. If there's no massive objections, can we then make the > meeting tomorrow night? Please add agenda items on the wiki (currently > still blank) [1]. We could have a meeting tomorrow, but attendance is often low when a meeting is announced on such short notice. I would suggest trying to settle on a schedule today, then set and announce the next meeting for next week. -Eric ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] font licensing notes
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 10:21:01PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: > (sorry, hit reply-to-list which sent to debconf16-team before, please > reply here) > > Hi Allison and Tammy (and team) > > On 09/09/2015 21:15, Allison Randal wrote: > > Just a quick skim, to think about as we settle on fonts: ... ... > > > > Tammy, I don't know what other fonts you're experimenting with, but I > > can quickly check their licenses for you. > > Thanks Allison, that's very useful, I went ahead and added them to the > wiki along with their license info and download links: > https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16/Artwork (I'm not subscribed to debconf16-team, so forgive me if you've previously discussed this.) I don't know much about licenses. But, DebConf users will file bugs [0] if we make them pull anything (fonts, css, js, etc) from anywhere else. Which is to say I think we'll need to be able to serve our own copy of whatever we end up using. -Eric [0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781402 ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] This week's meetings...
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:33:21AM +0200, Bernelle Verster wrote: > Hi all > * 2. Website meeting - Tammy, Raoul, Simon Other possibly relevant persons: wendar, tumbleweed, cate, edrz (me), (other past contributors ...), ... > Agenda: > ** 0. Timeframe - get prelimanary deadlines for all components of > website. - Bernelle can oversee this, but needs input from team. > ** 1. Design - Tammy to coordinate, incl content > ** 2. Front end design - Raoul to coordinate. [todo] incl > templatizing, decide on static site type (wafer?), layout and UX and > meta, wireframes, mockups, content matrix... "move information from > the website to the wiki" > ** 3. Back end design (wafer) - will this be part of the meeting, Simon? .oO( ** 4. SSL cert ... ) I'm not sure I understand this split between frontend and backend. For too long we've had (at least) 3 separate web facing systems: static site, wiki, conference management system (penta, summit, wafer(?)). The topics listed in 2. apply to each at least to some degree. Some of us, myself included, would like to see the 3 systems integrated as much as possible with a unified look/feel/user experience and minimised duplication of data, content and effort. Perhaps we can call it a web presence meeting? -Eric ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] Patch to DebConf orgateam structure
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 12:14:01PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote: On 08/29/2015 03:01 AM, Margarita Manterola wrote: When I advocate for the local team it's not for these people, but for the volunteers that will show up along the way. For those volunteers, joining debconf-team is traumatic. There's too many flamewars, too many things going on at the same time, and they have no idea how to fit into the already existing structures, they just want to help. One thing we need to work on is reducing those flamewars. They're not helpful to anyone. We absolutely need to improve communication and collaboration in the whole team. Remember, long-term team members aren't immune to being driven away by an unhealthy environment. I've been wanting to say much the same. The unhealthy environment is one of the main reasons I stopped participating for many months earlier this year. I'm sure I wasn't the only non-newcomer to walk away. I know that wasn't a helpful reaction. At the same time I felt that venting my frustrations and growing rage wouldn't have been helpful either. Also, non-local newcomers can be and probably have been put off by the disfunctions in the overall team environment. We need those volunteers, we need to be able to delegate stuff towards them, otherwise the DC16 organizing team has too big of a burden. But asking those volunteers to join debconf-team, follow the tons of discussions, follow the IRC meeting on #debconf-team, etc, has been proven to be too much. They just don't, which makes it much harder to integrate them so there's a high chance that you'll lose them. Of course, if any new recruits that join that local team feel like they want to integrate into the global structure they are totally welcome to join. It's not like being part of the local team precludes taking part in content, fundraising, or any other teams. It's just that it's not a pre-requisite to understand and fit into the structure in order to volunteer for working towards DC16. That point was mentioned too. But again, all that requires is for local members of the DebConf team to make local volunteers feel welcome. Defining a local team doesn't help with that. A safe environment to discuss DebConf in a given year's local language is one solid argument I've heard in the past in favor of a local team. I don't recall seeing that mentioned in this thread thus far. I think there have been more than a few years where many local newcomers, and consequently the conference as a whole, benefitted from being able to communicate about the conference in their native language. Perhaps that need can be met by an irc channel and list, without being a formal team. I honestly don't know. Not an issue for dc16, afaik, but should be kept in mind as we are talking about more than just the coming 10 months. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: Timestretching task, now Audio Utilities task
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 04:21:48PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 22 August 2015 at 14:01, Ross Gammon r...@the-gammons.net wrote: Hi All, Previously, the timestretching blends task only had a few packages that fitted that small theme. Meanwhile there were loads of other audio utilities that were scattered around other tasks (like recording, mixing and players) and tending to add a lot of clutter. I have now widened the scope of the timestretching task so that it is about Audio Utilities (e.g. audio conversion, chopping, pitch shifting, tagging, silence detection etc.). http://blends.debian.org/multimedia/tasks/timestretching Take a look and let me know what you think. If there are no objections, I will rename the meta-package as well, ready for the next upload. Looks good to me, much better than the single-purpose timestretch task. ecatools would seem to me to fit in that scope. Maybe ecasound itself? (at least in the lower relevance section.) -Eric Rz. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [Debconf-team] Orga sprint meetings tomorrow 10:00 and 16:00, room Amsterdam
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 07:53:11PM +0200, Daniel Lange wrote: Ladies and Gentlemen, there are two sprint meetings for orga topics tomorrow: 13 Aug 10:00 Amsterdam DebConf confmanagement system sprint 13 Aug 16:00 Amsterdam DebConf orga sprint Will there be somesort of report of what occurred in the afternoon orga sprint? -Eric ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] registration sprint video
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 08:38:54AM +0200, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote: Hello Eric, On 17 Aug 2015, at 06:25, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 01:48:12PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: Hi folks, The registration sprint video is up at http://veyepar.dc15.debconf.org/static/veyepar/debian/debconf15/webm/DebConf_registration_system_sprint.webm At the start of the video Martin points to the screen and mentions a titanpad. Can someone point me to it? it is this https://titanpad.com/20150813-confmgmt And some additional technical discussion (about wafer, micro services) should be done onsite, but not yet done. Wendar and tumbleweed: when do you have time for a very informal discussion of what you have in mind? ciao cate Towards the end of the sprint there was talk of a hacking session and perhaps an ad-hoc event sometime this week. Has anything further occurred or been scheduled? For various reasons I wasn't in #debconf-team or -infra or #debconf16-capetown (or ???), so I don't have irc logs of that side of the discussion. Can someone make logs for that time frame available? Thanks, Eric ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] registration sprint video
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 01:48:12PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: Hi folks, The registration sprint video is up at http://veyepar.dc15.debconf.org/static/veyepar/debian/debconf15/webm/DebConf_registration_system_sprint.webm I probably need to talk to Holger to be able to upload those videos to video.debian.net, but for now you can access them directly from the encoding server. There is still an issue with the audio normalization that I need to fine-tune, so the audio may be fairly quiet right now. At the start of the video Martin points to the screen and mentions a titanpad. Can someone point me to it? Thanks, Eric Rz. ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] registration sprint video
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 07:03:20AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com [2015-08-17 06:25 +0200]: At the start of the video Martin points to the screen and mentions a titanpad. Can someone point me to it? https://titanpad.com/20150813-confmgmt Allison wanted to move this to a wiki page today, but I am sure she'll add a pointer when done. Great. Thanks. -Eric ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Bug#781553: summit.debconf.org: event submissions leads to creator not listed as speaker
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 01:21:16AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: Package: summit.debconf.org Severity: normal Right now, if somebody submits an events, they are not listed as speaker on the URL, e.g. (as of right now): https://summit.debconf.org/debconf15/meeting/184/reproducible-builds-roundtable-discussing-the-changes-needed-for-officially-reproducible-builds/ The propose_event view wasn't adding the proposer to the meeting.speakers field. Fixed in: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debconf-data/summit.git/commit/?id=4742c3af3e570d6db4970293d8b04e8631c5a1b9 Tomorrow I'll try to put together a script to populate the speakers field for previously proposed events. Furhtermore, content team members do not see the creator as speaker when editing the event: https://summit.debconf.org/debconf15/edit_mtg/184/reproducible-builds-roundtable-discussing-the-changes-needed-for-officially-reproducible-builds/ I think this is not intuitive. Agreed. Fixed in: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debconf-data/summit.git/commit/?id=d840cdcb6df1d1c7f7d2ed6b0803eba66bd16dfe I'll leave this bug open until we've backfilled the missing Speakers. -edrz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#781555: summit.debconf.org: adding additional speakers is cumbersome and errorprone
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 01:28:45AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: Package: summit.debconf.org Severity: normal Hi, as a content team member, one can edit additional speakers via the Edit Meeting form. However, the UI is a simple multi-select, and it seems very easy to remove existing speakers from it. This is the same for the admin UI view. I think it would be really much better if the Speakers/Coordinators/Moderators list would be just a line for each key person who is already confirmed with a way to delete them, similar to the Participants view. The rationale is that multi-speaker/roundtable presentations are really quite common in DebConf and should be easy to handle. I agree this should be improved. After 781553 is done, I'll try to get something better. -edrz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [Debconf-team] Cannot sign in with Alioth Account
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:41:43AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: On Thu, 26 Mar 2015, Richard Hartmann wrote: On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Meike Reichle me...@alphamar.org wrote: I just noticed that I cannot use my alioth account (meike-guest) to sign in at https://summit.debconf.org/debconf15/registration/ It works on https://alioth.debian.org/ but the Debian Single Sign On page gives me an Authentication failed. Who should I contact about this? Is this a DebConf, an alioth or an SSO issue? Alioth is under _massive_ load at the moment; if there are errors from time to time, I would suspect it's a load issue and just try again later. alioth isn't under load anymore, but anyhow alioth isn't involved in the login process. The LDAP tree gets regulary synced to the SSO host, therefore it is not possible that an unavailable alioth host influences the login process. Is it possible for there to be a problem with the sync, then? -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] problems with DC14 website(s) and getting a list of talks
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 03:53:55PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote: Hi, please forgive me if this isn't the right place to report the following. I was interested to see a list of talks that took place at DC14, so I went to the DC14 website[1] and clicked 'Schedule'[2]. The resulting page on a different sub-domain talks about DC14 in the wrong tense (DebConf14 will be held…) Fixed now. and it seems I must Register in Summit to get any further. Is it really expected for people to register to see a list of talks for a conference in the past? Yes, we should stop showing the register button. But, the various links to the schedule work without logging in. If I click around a bit further I can find links to the video streams host[3] but this site is only showing the default nginx page and has no onward links. Sadly, I am currently without an index of talks with hyperlinks to corresponding recordings where available. (I can get to the recordings directly, mostly by remembering the address from prior debconfs, but guessing the talk topic from the filenames is sub-optimal.) This is indeed a missing feature. It's on the list of stuff to fix before DC15. Once we've added it we can populate the links for DC14. Sadly no one has had time, yet, to fix this. (important and long standing https issues snipped as they are beyond my control) -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] Please have a mailing list for content team
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 06:00:20PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Margarita Manterola margamanter...@gmail.com [2015-02-24 16:45 +0100]: However, with the new organization, a lot of matters fall in the hands of the content team that really don't warrant any secrecy (organization of sprints, conference schedule, call for proposals, etc). I'm with David Bremner and don't think we need another list, especially since e.g. conference schedule is not really just content team realm, but a task that requires collaboration from whatever team does the venue and general logistics. Many of us that are not in the content team would like to be able to read and/or participate in this discussions. It's not in the spirit of Debian nor DebConf to have this discussions hidden from the rest. I agree with you that we don't want cabals and secrecy. However, we should also make sure that we're ready for this, that is that having possibly endless public discussions does not prevent people in charge from making decisions in a timely manner. I feel, if I understand her correctly, as Marga does about this and said so in the meeting. I don't necessarily want to subscribe to another list, but do want to be able to look back at a public archive to understand why certain decisions were made in order to provide informed feedback and input. As for having it on -team ... you have said many times in various ways that we need to trust teams to do their work and make their decisions, which I think I mostly agree with. I don't know if it's the right way or best way to get to that goal, but it seems likely to me that a separate public list could be a mechanism to mentally and logistically provide that autonomy while also providing transparency. That said, using -team, imho would be better than the content@ alias, just by virtue of being public. It might require something of a cultural shift and change of thinking for many of us (myself definitely included) to provide a sub team with input, advice and opinions w/o trying to control or micro-manage that sub team's decisions. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
[Debconf-video] [santi...@debian.org: Re: [Debconf-team] Draft schedule format]
- Forwarded message from Santiago Ruano Rincón santi...@debian.org - Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 17:24:26 +0100 From: Santiago Ruano Rincón santi...@debian.org Subject: Re: [Debconf-team] Draft schedule format To: debconf team list debconf-t...@lists.debconf.org Cc: cont...@debconf.org Hi there! On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 01:57:22PM +0100, Margarita Manterola wrote: Dear content team, Madduck, Maxy and me visited the hostel yesterday, to discuss several of the local issues, and they indicated that we could work with them into perhaps making some changes to the food times that they had given us. This is not a certain thing and would require some pushing and negotiating, but if we really need it, we could try to do it. AFAIK, lunch and dinner would overlap 30 minutes each with talks/events, and the last 15 minutes of breakfast with the daily announcements. I don't know if this would be a real problem. Do you think 1h30 dedicated for lunch would be enough? Maybe we should have a 2 hours break at noon? I know that you are working on a draft schedule format for DebConf15, but I don't know the exact details of the work that is going on. It would be nice if you could publish the draft that you have been working on up to now, and if you could tell us if there are any changes with the times that we should push for in our future negotiations with the hostel. I've pushed in debconf-data git repo an ods spreadsheet that summarizes what would be a possible schedule for the week. debconf-data/dc15/schedule/debconf15-schedule.ods Am I missing something? Cheers! Santiago ___ Debconf-team mailing list debconf-t...@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team - End forwarded message - ___ Debconf-video mailing list Debconf-video@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-video
Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 12:19:53AM -0500, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 03:36:33AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com wrote: Are we settled on debconf-in...@lists.debian.org ? Maybe wait over the weekend; if there's no opposition then that's the name. Will do. Thanks. -edrz Done: https://lists.debian.org/debconf-infra/ I think we've now answered all of Don's questions. -edrz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 12:19:53AM -0500, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 03:36:33AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com wrote: Are we settled on debconf-in...@lists.debian.org ? Maybe wait over the weekend; if there's no opposition then that's the name. Will do. Thanks. -edrz Done: https://lists.debian.org/debconf-infra/ I think we've now answered all of Don's questions. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
[Debconf-team] [ow...@bugs.debian.org: Bug#776982 closed by Don Armstrong d...@debian.org (reply to ow...@bugs.debian.org) (Re: Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package
The summit.debconf.org psuedo-package has been created. -edrz - Forwarded message from Debian Bug Tracking System ow...@bugs.debian.org - Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:03:05 + From: Debian Bug Tracking System ow...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#776982 closed by Don Armstrong d...@debian.org (reply to ow...@bugs.debian.org) (Re: Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package) To: Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.503) This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report which was filed against the bugs.debian.org package: #776982: add summit.debconf.org pseudo-package It has been closed by Don Armstrong d...@debian.org (reply to ow...@bugs.debian.org). Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please contact Don Armstrong d...@debian.org (reply to ow...@bugs.debian.org) by replying to this email. -- 776982: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776982 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 10:00:12 -0800 From: Don Armstrong d...@debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package To: 776982-d...@bugs.debian.org Created with the following settings: diff --git a/pseudo-packages.description b/pseudo-packages.description index 4296336..56f9522 100644 --- a/pseudo-packages.description +++ b/pseudo-packages.description @@ -34,3 +34,4 @@ piuparts.debian.org Issues with the piuparts.debian.org service sso.debian.org Problems and requests related to the Debian Single Sign On system tracker.debian.org Issues with the Debian Package Tracker and coordination of its maintenance d-i.debian.org Issues regarding the d-i.debian.org service and general Debian Installer tasks +summit.debconf.org Problems and requests related to the DebConf Summit instance diff --git a/pseudo-packages.maintainers b/pseudo-packages.maintainers index 442d2e0..7fbe228 100644 --- a/pseudo-packages.maintainers +++ b/pseudo-packages.maintainers @@ -34,3 +34,4 @@ piuparts.debian.org Piuparts Developers piuparts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org sso.debian.org Debian SSO Team debian-...@lists.debian.org tracker.debian.org Debian QA Team debian...@lists.debian.org d-i.debian.org Debian Installer debian-b...@lists.debian.org +summit.debconf.org Debconf Infrastructure Team debconf-in...@lists.debian.org -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com Good people are good because they've come to wisdom through failure. We get very little wisdom from success, you know. -- William Saroyan _My Heart's in the Highlands_ Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:23:17 -0800 From: Don Armstrong d...@debian.org Subject: Re: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package To: sub...@bugs.debian.org Package: bugs.debian.org Severity: wishlist Control: tag -1 moreinfo Control: submitter -1 Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com Control: retitle -1 add summit.debconf.org psuedo-package On Tue, 03 Feb 2015, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: The DebConf Infrastructure team requests a new pseudo-package, summit.debconf.org, for use in tracking bugs, feature requests and so forth for DebConf's instance of the Summit conference management system. In order to create the psuedopackage, I need the 1) name of the psuedopackage Presumably, that's summit.debconf.org in this case. 2) a short description of what the pseudopackage will be used for (suitable for inclusion in https://www.debian.org/Bugs/pseudo-packages) 3) The e-mail address of the maintainer of the psuedopackage who will receive mail related to that mailing list I also like to see an example existing bugs (or e-mails which would have been/will be turned into bugs) which will be reassigned to this pseudopackage once it is created. This is primarily so that I know that the pseudopackage will be used. Finally, I must note that the name of the psuedopackage will never be available for a Debian package in the archive. [Given the name chosen, that seems fine.] -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com What I can't stand is the feeling that my brain is leaving me for someone more interesting. - End forwarded message - ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
[Debconf-team] Bug#778247: Please create debconf-in...@list.debian.org
Package: lists.debian.org Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debconf-team@lists.debconf.org Name: debconf-in...@lists.debian.org Rationale: The DebConf infrastructure team has requested a new pseudo-package in the BTS for tracking issues related to summit.debconf.org, our conference management system. See bug #776982. As discussed there this list will serve as the maintainer address required to receive BTS mail. It will also be useful for team discussions that aren't appropriate for the debconf-team or debconf-video lists. Short Description: DebConf Infrastructure team. Long Description: DebConf Infrastructure team discussions and bug report handling. Category: DebConf Subscription Policy: Open Post Policy: Open Web Archive: Yes Thank you, Eric Rzewnicki (on behalf of DebConf Infrastructure team) ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Bug#778247: Please create debconf-in...@list.debian.org
Package: lists.debian.org Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debconf-t...@lists.debconf.org Name: debconf-in...@lists.debian.org Rationale: The DebConf infrastructure team has requested a new pseudo-package in the BTS for tracking issues related to summit.debconf.org, our conference management system. See bug #776982. As discussed there this list will serve as the maintainer address required to receive BTS mail. It will also be useful for team discussions that aren't appropriate for the debconf-team or debconf-video lists. Short Description: DebConf Infrastructure team. Long Description: DebConf Infrastructure team discussions and bug report handling. Category: DebConf Subscription Policy: Open Post Policy: Open Web Archive: Yes Thank you, Eric Rzewnicki (on behalf of DebConf Infrastructure team) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 12:03:29PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com writes: On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:01:09AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org wrote: I think the best would be to create a new list for this on lists.debian.org. We want to move all the debconf lists to the Debian list infrastructure anyway. Yes. I suggest debconf-sum...@lists.debian.org. Not a slightly broader debconf-infra@l.d.o ? That sounds even better. Gaudenz Are we settled on debconf-in...@lists.debian.org ? -edrz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 03:36:33AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com wrote: Are we settled on debconf-in...@lists.debian.org ? Maybe wait over the weekend; if there's no opposition then that's the name. Will do. Thanks. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 03:36:33AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com wrote: Are we settled on debconf-in...@lists.debian.org ? Maybe wait over the weekend; if there's no opposition then that's the name. Will do. Thanks. -edrz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 12:03:29PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com writes: On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:01:09AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org wrote: I think the best would be to create a new list for this on lists.debian.org. We want to move all the debconf lists to the Debian list infrastructure anyway. Yes. I suggest debconf-sum...@lists.debian.org. Not a slightly broader debconf-infra@l.d.o ? That sounds even better. Gaudenz Are we settled on debconf-in...@lists.debian.org ? -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] Food [Re: Registration questions]
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 07:27:30PM +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: Hi everybody El 05/02/15 a las 17:25, Daniel Kahn Gillmor escribió: I would change the perspective: tell cooks the things they can add to the menu. What about this proposal? Diet: - Not applicable - Vegan (strict vegetarian) - Lacto-Ovo Vegetarian (dairy and eggs OK) default - Omnivore (dairy, eggs, meat or fish OK) - Other (contact registrat...@debconf.org ASAP) If we think that people should be able to ask for meat/fish in every meal (my take is no, but you know better DebConf demographics), I would add an option after Omnivore: - Carnivore (Omnivore, with meat or fish in every meal) votes++ I'm an omnivore who eats a lot of vegetables with every meal and prefers no meat several days most weeks. I enjoy cooking with and eating tofu several days most weeks. I would find this framing of the options quite acceptable and actually nice. Often meal options for the traditional default end up with primarily meat + starch with vegetables as an after thought. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:01:09AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org wrote: I think the best would be to create a new list for this on lists.debian.org. We want to move all the debconf lists to the Debian list infrastructure anyway. Yes. I suggest debconf-sum...@lists.debian.org. Not a slightly broader debconf-infra@l.d.o ? Fine by me. I would prefer not to need a new ML, but it seems as if we need one, so... Who should make the request? I'll do it if you want and the listmasters accept new list requests from mere users. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:01:09AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org wrote: I think the best would be to create a new list for this on lists.debian.org. We want to move all the debconf lists to the Debian list infrastructure anyway. Yes. I suggest debconf-sum...@lists.debian.org. Not a slightly broader debconf-infra@l.d.o ? Fine by me. I would prefer not to need a new ML, but it seems as if we need one, so... Who should make the request? I'll do it if you want and the listmasters accept new list requests from mere users. -edrz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 07:49:32PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com wrote: I suggest debconf-sum...@lists.debian.org. Not a slightly broader debconf-infra@l.d.o ? I pondered that as well. But what if bursaries, front desk, etc want to talk about summit specifically? Then that's on -team? or those teams perhaps need a designated infra-liason? I don't know. OTOH, what if we use something else in a few years? You mean if the current re-org structure doesn't pan out? Then what about debconf-devel@ ? Surely DebConf will never evolve beyond having development needs. Who should make the request? I'll do it if you want and the listmasters accept new list requests from mere users. It probably makes most sense if tumbleweed and/or me make the request. Or you do it and point to here once we know what we want/need. Either way is fine. Ok. You seem to have a lot on your plate, and are some kind of manager or something, so I'll take it on. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 07:49:32PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com wrote: I suggest debconf-sum...@lists.debian.org. Not a slightly broader debconf-infra@l.d.o ? I pondered that as well. But what if bursaries, front desk, etc want to talk about summit specifically? Then that's on -team? or those teams perhaps need a designated infra-liason? I don't know. OTOH, what if we use something else in a few years? You mean if the current re-org structure doesn't pan out? Then what about debconf-devel@ ? Surely DebConf will never evolve beyond having development needs. Who should make the request? I'll do it if you want and the listmasters accept new list requests from mere users. It probably makes most sense if tumbleweed and/or me make the request. Or you do it and point to here once we know what we want/need. Either way is fine. Ok. You seem to have a lot on your plate, and are some kind of manager or something, so I'll take it on. -edrz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [Debconf-team] proposal for registration and info page
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 12:43:57AM +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: Hi everybody I've been looking at past DebConf websites. Even if all of you agree with this, I don't know how to make the corresponding changes for creating the menus in the main page etc. So another person should do that, I think. See the div id=main-menu in page.tt -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
[Debconf-team] Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package
Dear BTS admins, The DebConf Infrastructure team requests a new pseudo-package, summit.debconf.org, for use in tracking bugs, feature requests and so forth for DebConf's instance of the Summit conference management system. See the thread starting here: http://lists.debconf.org/lurker/message/20150121.181821.9a8d1969.en.html for discussion and support of this request. Thank you for your time and efforts, Eric Rzewnicki (on behalf of DebConf Team) ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 06:28:37PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: Thanks! Richard Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity. So it is now a bug against bugs.debian.org with a request for more info. See Don's response below. I'll follow up in #776982. I think I can provide the requested info. But, of course, suggestions from the team will help. 1) pseudo-package name: summit.debconf.org 2) description: Issues regarding the summit.debconf.org software and service 3) maintainer address: debconf-team@lists.debconf.org ? I would not be comfortable with this being just me or any other single person. Bug examples: https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/Summit#TODO and #DONE TODOs in summit.git (and maybe my local TODO) Those are probably enough, but I can also dig up some relevant mailinglist threads from this year and last. -edrz From debb...@buxtehude.debian.org Tue Feb 3 14:27:52 2015 Subject: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package Reply-To: ow...@bugs.debian.org, 776...@bugs.debian.org Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:23:17 -0800 From: Don Armstrong d...@debian.org To: sub...@bugs.debian.org Package: bugs.debian.org Severity: wishlist Control: tag -1 moreinfo Control: submitter -1 Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com Control: retitle -1 add summit.debconf.org psuedo-package On Tue, 03 Feb 2015, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: The DebConf Infrastructure team requests a new pseudo-package, summit.debconf.org, for use in tracking bugs, feature requests and so forth for DebConf's instance of the Summit conference management system. In order to create the psuedopackage, I need the 1) name of the psuedopackage Presumably, that's summit.debconf.org in this case. 2) a short description of what the pseudopackage will be used for (suitable for inclusion in https://www.debian.org/Bugs/pseudo-packages) 3) The e-mail address of the maintainer of the psuedopackage who will receive mail related to that mailing list I also like to see an example existing bugs (or e-mails which would have been/will be turned into bugs) which will be reassigned to this pseudopackage once it is created. This is primarily so that I know that the pseudopackage will be used. Finally, I must note that the name of the psuedopackage will never be available for a Debian package in the archive. [Given the name chosen, that seems fine.] -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com What I can't stand is the feeling that my brain is leaving me for someone more interesting. ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] Using the BTS as a summit issue tracker
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 07:56:31PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com [2015-01-21 19:18 +0100]: Honestly, I don't think we need a team discussion. This should be the infrastructure team's decision just like upstream choses the BTS/issue tracker for their software. I certainly don't disagree. But, -infra don't have our own mailing list and it was suggested to me (by bremner, i think?) that I point to some public evidence of team consensus when sending the request to the BTS admins. I wasn't sure the request would be accepted coming from me as a non-DD who's not really known in Debian outside of debconf-team. That said, I think the proposal is sane and would rather see it done sooner than later, unless of course there are good arguments against it. Thanks for weighing in. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
[Debconf-team] Using the BTS as a summit issue tracker
I propose we use a psuedo-package in the BTS for summit isues. The BTS already exists and is a central piece of Debian culture, so it seems to me it would be a good fit. I find it confusing and difficult to use the wiki[0] to track bugs and development requests for summit. Determining who made a particular request in order to contact them for more information is cumbersome, at best. It's also non-optimal for tracking discussion of a given issue. For development requests, it's not clear if something is just a random idea or annoyance someone had in a particular moment or something that a given subteam has discussed, reached consensus about and signed off on. For these reasons and more, I think we need a real ticketing system for Summit. Martin attempted to start a discussion[1] about a general solution for all of DebConf to replace rt. But, it didn't progress, yet. If there are suggestions for a general solution, please respond to that thread. I've discussed the BTS idea with a number of people on irc several times. I don't recall opposition and there were a number of people positive about the idea. I don't recall anyone wanting to try to use rt for this. I do recall several people definitely _not_ wanting to use the alioth tracker. Probably not everyone who might care was present at those times and my memory is definitely fallible. So, please, discuss. I propose to wait 1 week for discussion. If there is consensus that this is a good idea I'll take the action item to request the psuedo-package from the BTS admins, pointing to this thread as rationale and evidence of team support. If there is no response or significant disagreement, I suggest it be added to the 2015-02-02 meeting agenda. Thanks for reading, edrz [0] https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/Summit#TODO [1] http://lists.debconf.org/lurker/message/20141216.211326.9c02fa68.en.html ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] Using the BTS as a summit issue tracker
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 08:27:23PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com wrote: I propose we use a psuedo-package in the BTS for summit isues. The BTS already exists and is a central piece of Debian culture, so it seems to me it would be a good fit. I would prefer if we had an actual package, but a pseudo one will do fine for now. Oh. right. I had asked about that last year. Vorlon, i think it was, said something like packaging web aps is fraught with peril. So I let it go then. What packaging skills I had are very rusty, so I'm not sure I know what he meant. But, in principle, I agree if it can be done that it would be worthwhile to have summit and all the dependencies packaged in debian. I would even like to work on that. But, probably not right now given our more pressing needs. It's something to file a bug about, perhaps. ;) Martin attempted to start a discussion[1] about a general solution for all of DebConf to replace rt. But, it didn't progress, yet. If there are suggestions for a general solution, please respond to that thread. I still don't think that scales, especially for sponsorship. He mentioned that, particularly for sponsorship, some things need to be kept confidential. I'm only talking about summit right now. I propose to wait 1 week for discussion. If there is consensus that this is a good idea I'll take the action item to request the psuedo-package from the BTS admins, pointing to this thread as rationale and evidence of team support. If there is no response or significant disagreement, I suggest it be added to the 2015-02-02 meeting agenda. With my infra team lead hat on, I would say we don't even need to wait a full week. As you say, this should not be very controversial and I would want to move sooner rather than later. Thanks for picking this up again, Richard Certainly. I'm only sorry I didn't get to it sooner. Thanks for your response. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] DC15 - Event submission form
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 09:56:04PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach René Mayorga rmayo...@debian.org.sv [2015-01-20 21:31 +0100]: What about the list of presenters/organisers? Currently the submitter of the event is the drafter(owner) of the event, we need to make sure if summit can handle multiple owners for one talk, a field for this can be included, but also there are not too much events with multiple owners, then if it is supported we can also add the rest of the owners from the admin interface? During DC14 we modified summit so that it displays the list of people in required_attendees as Speakers: . This automatically includes the drafter. Others can be declared required via the admin. (There might also be one or more forms outside the admin, but I'm not immediately remembering which.) -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] DC15 - Event submission form
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 09:56:04PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach René Mayorga rmayo...@debian.org.sv [2015-01-20 21:31 +0100]: What about the list of presenters/organisers? Currently the submitter of the event is the drafter(owner) of the event, we need to make sure if summit can handle multiple owners for one talk, a field for this can be included, but also there are not too much events with multiple owners, then if it is supported we can also add the rest of the owners from the admin interface? Right, this should be a 1:∞ relation and with Django it should not be hard to hack this up quickly for the event owner to control themselves. That would seem to require presenting the owner with the list of attendees from which to choose. Since it's been requested that we remove that field from the propose_event form, doesn't it follow that we ought not expose it elsewhere? -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] Using the BTS as a summit issue tracker
Hi Brian, On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 02:57:13PM -0500, Brian Gupta wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:31 PM, martin f krafft madd...@debconf.org wrote: also sprach Richard Hartmann richih.mailingl...@gmail.com [2015-01-21 20:27 +0100]: I propose we use a psuedo-package in the BTS for summit isues. The BTS already exists and is a central piece of Debian culture, so it seems to me it would be a good fit. I would prefer if we had an actual package, but a pseudo one will do fine for now. While it would be good to have summit in Debian, of course, you would also want to have a place to track DebConf-specific issues. Just to be clear, that if we are talking about using BTS to track feature requests and changes to Summit, I see no major issues, and would defer to those working on Summit. If we are looking beyond that, (e.g. sponsorship lead tracking), BTS would likely be suboptimal. Right. I'm only talking here about tracking issues regarding summit development. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] DC15 - Event submission form
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:44:38PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach René Mayorga rmayo...@debian.org.sv [2015-01-20 19:50 +0100]: ... 4) Type: + Plenary + Talk (New requested type, s/Presentation/Talk/) Just out of curiosity: why? + BoF + Social (New requested type) + Special event. + Ad-Hoc (New requested type) Will you disable ad-hoc submissions until the conference? To my thinking, ad-hoc is not an attribute of an event, but of the combination of time slot and room into which it might be scheduled. In summit-speak, I think we should make a new Ad-hoc type of a Slot. It is probably possible to make it so that such slot/room combinations aren't available for scheduling until we want them to be. i.e. 24 hours in advance, or whatever time limit content team decides. Then within those slots any appropriate type (talk, BoF, social, discussion, what-have-you) of Ad-Hoc events could be scheduled. Being Ad-Hoc is about when an event's creator(s) gets to claim space and time for it. Not about what said event is going to do with that spacetime. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] DC15 - Event submission form
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:44:38PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach René Mayorga rmayo...@debian.org.sv [2015-01-20 19:50 +0100]: 1) Title ... 7) Notes to Content team (New requested type) What about the list of presenters/organisers? Do you mean the list that an event proposer/creator gets to choose from to select Participants? I recall some were concerned about this exposing the list of attendees. If we disable it in the propose_event form, I guess events with multiple speakers/organizers/whatever would require intervention by someone with special summit perms. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf ticketing system
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:13:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: Folks, we've had rt.debconf.org for years, but it's hardly used and just accumulates spam. Rather than cleaning it up and hoping that this will make the difference, I propose we use the time instead to implement a better-suited system, possibly using Django (which, if integrated with Summit would make it easy for our attendees to file bugs). But no worries, a mail interface will hopefully be a requirement. Does anyone have experience with Django+mail-based ticketing systems and could make a suggestion? What about using a Debian Conference psuedo package in the BTS? -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-discuss] remote participation in DebConf
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 09:29:46AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: Richard Hartmann richih.mailingl...@gmail.com writes: Could the video volunteer peek into a dedicated question channel during the qa part? This video volunteer couldn't -- dyslexia means that if I'm IRCing then I'm not doing anything else (so not directing the video or mixing the sound or whatever my job was supposed to be as a video volunteer). I've seen people that think they can multi-task doing a pretty mediocre job when their attention's elsewhere, and any one of the video jobs can require all of one's attention at times, particularly in the QA sections. This sounds like a job for a new volunteer, unless people think that i.e. the talk-meister should have enough spare time at that point in a talk, but then it needs to be made very clear to the volunteers that that is part of the role. A dedicated irc proxy volunteer is probably what would be wanted. It is not really a video team task. The talkmeister ought to be watching the clock and passing the microphone, not looking at irc. (incidentally, there's no really strong reason the talkmeister has to be a video team person, either.) -edrz ___ Debconf-discuss mailing list Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
Re: [Debconf-team] Report from the talks team
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:13:30AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Ana Guerrero Lopez a...@debian.org [2014-09-16 22:19 +0200]: For bursaries, we had a simple interface allowing us to vote on each participant with between -3 and +3 points. This would be trivial to do for events too, I guess. The actual scheduling would be best done with drag-n-drop, I feel, but someone will need to implement this on top of Summit. No idea how hard this is going to be, but it doesn't sound easy. Summit has a javascript drag-n-drop thing[0]. /summit/date/display?edit is available to those with scheduler permissions. It is a one-day-at-a-time scheduling interface. I played with it briefly and found it buggy and glitchy in my local summit instance. I don't know if anyone tried it on the live site. If that kind of thing is wanted, it already exists. Might just need some small(?) tweaking. Personally, I would find it cumbersome even if it can be made to work properly. But, I am not a scheduler and generally avoid mice as much as I can, so maybe it would be fine for those doing this work. -edrz [0] In debconf-data/summit.git on alioth: view: summit/schedule/views.py_process_date_view() json: summit/schedule/render.pyjs_data() template: summit/schedule/templates/schedule/schedule.html javascript: summit/media/schedule/schedule.js summit/media/ajax.js ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-video] Videos from Saturday and Sunday
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 01:48:24PM -0400, Caitlin Matos wrote: Hello, None of the videos from Saturday Aug 30 and Sunday Aug 31 are available anywhere. Will these be up in the near future? aiui, more .webm's are ready, but await a means of pushing (or pulling) them to the public archive. They should be available RSN. -edrz ___ Debconf-video mailing list Debconf-video@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-video
Re: [Debconf-team] Question about a video from DebConf Portland 2014
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 12:16:18PM -0600, Scott Dowdle wrote: Greetings, I've asked this in the #debian channel on the Freenode IRC network but so far I haven't gotten an answer so I thought I'd try this email address. Debian and Debconf channels are mostly on oftc, not freenode. The #debconf-video Carl pointed you to is there. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
[Debconf-team] Separating Speakers and hiding Participants/Attendees in Summit
Regarding: commit to master 7429fb7 debconf-data/summit summit/ (5 files in 2 dirs) Separate and pluralize speakers, hide participants list from non-organizers There are some views that list Participants (sometime as Attendees) that I don't think we should change, or am uncertain about changing. These two I'm pretty sure about: *attendees.html only accessible by drafter organizer (or it looks like only they get the link from meeting.html) *review.html only available to organizers These three I request guidance on: *virtual_meeting.html: Will debconf ever be virtual? *by_participant.html: attendee's own schedule, aka My Schedule. Should an attendee be able to see who else wants to attend meetings he/she intends to attend? *mine.html: the meeting creator should be able to see who wants to attend their event, shouldn't they? -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-discuss] Summit discussion on Thursday, 11:00am (18:00 UTC)
Thanks for the input! All good points that need to be addressed, just a current comment below on some work in progress. On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 07:08:25AM -0700, Paul Wise wrote: On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 2:08 AM, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote: And IMHO we disclose too much information in schedule. In my opinion the too much information issue was in leaking the registered attendee list to people loading the event registration page. Also the default for attendees should be to be able to mark their attendance but choose who sees it (admins, speakers, attendees or general public), with admins (or maybe speakers) being the default. I am in the process of adjusting things to address this. (at least partially) The presented information was confusing in some instances; I had to inform people that bold means it is the speaker or that you can login to confirm that. I think it would be better to define a list of people and their relationship with the event (speaker, facilitator, panel member, other required, video team, likely to attend, might attend, etc) and present those roles on the event page. Clearly separating the speaker(s) and hiding the attendees from non-organizers is what I am currently working on. With any luck I'll have that done tomorrow. It'll be an improvement, but there will surely be more concerns to discuss and address over time. For now, though, Daytrip! \o/ -edrz ___ Debconf-discuss mailing list Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
[Debconf-discuss] shirt and wrist wrap left at Rooster Rock
I had a pleasant nap on a picnic table overlooking the water at Rooster Rock State Park (where we ate lunch). Unfortunately I almost missed my bus and in my haste to gather my stuff ended up leaving a brown t-shirt and a wrist wrap[0] drying out on a tree stump nearby. The stump was roughly between the restrooms and the bluff overlooking the water. If anyone happened to find them and bring them back, please let me know. Thanks. -edrz [0] http://harbingerfitness.com/product/140/ ___ Debconf-discuss mailing list Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
Re: [Debconf-discuss] Summit discussion on Thursday, 11:00am (18:00 UTC)
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 03:26:35PM -0700, martin f krafft wrote: Hello, as you may know, DC14 uses a new conference management system (summit) and we are rather happy with it. But there are obviously aspects that need improvement. We will meet on Thursday at 11 in room 338 to discuss the future of Summit and DebConf. Whether you already know Django or not, if you are interested in helping out, we would love to see you there. Here are some of the issues we need to work on: https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/Summit#TODO And also the session's summit page: https://summit.debconf.org/debconf14/meeting/143/summit-summit/ -edrz ___ Debconf-discuss mailing list Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
Re: [Debconf-video] dc14 video setup and training schedule
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 03:02:47AM -0700, Holger Levsen wrote: On Mittwoch, 20. August 2014, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: It isn't mentioned in Carl's mail of the setup schedule, but previously none of the talk rooms were reserved on Thursday and only the ballroom was reserved on Friday and that for only 4 hours in the evening. I wonder whether anybody expected to have video at all then ;-P There have clearly been communication problems all around throughout the dc14 cycle. I'm not pointing any fingers or laying any blame. Doing so would not be be helpful in any way that I can see. Nor do I mean to stoke the flames of any anger or resentment or other negative stuff. I only hoped to point out that videoteam and localteam managed to workout something better wrt the setup schedule than what was going to be available as of a week ago. -edrz ___ Debconf-video mailing list Debconf-video@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-video
Re: [Debconf-video] dc14 video setup and training schedule
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 06:23:55PM +0200, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: Hello, On Sat, 2014-08-16 at 13:57 -0500, Carl Karsten wrote: For anyone that was planning on helping setup on Thursday, there won't be much to do. for 100 reasons I pushed the equipment delivery to Friday. We don't need 100 reasons, one would be enough. On the opposite there were some good reasons to deliver the equipments earlier: * Some people planned to arrive ahead to setup, test and adjust the setup. It isn't mentioned in Carl's mail of the setup schedule, but previously none of the talk rooms were reserved on Thursday and only the ballroom was reserved on Friday and that for only 4 hours in the evening. This setup schedule is actually an improvement worked out with the localteam and the building management. -edrz ___ Debconf-video mailing list Debconf-video@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-video
Re: [Debconf-discuss] tai chi
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 04:48:55PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: I am planning my usual 6am tai chi practice for Debconf. If you know Yang Style short form[*] and would like to join me, please drop me an email. I don't yet know where I'll be, but I'll spend a little time on Google maps scoping out some nice locations. :) Unfortunately, it's not easy to teach much to beginners in the short amount of time available, so I can't offer that for the morning, but I'd be happy to talk about it and show you a few things at other times of the day. However, if you even know parts of the form, it's always fun to have company. Cheers, -Barry [*] as originally brought to the west by Cheng Man-ch'ing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheng_Man-ch%27ing. We can do some push hands, sword form, 18 Chinese Therapies, and breathing meditation if you know those too. I'm a long time out of practice, but was hoping someone might be doing some of this. I'll try to join you. -edrz ___ Debconf-discuss mailing list Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
[Debconf-team] (no subject)
debconf-vi...@lists.debconf.org Bcc: Subject: available switches? (was Re: [Debconf-team] confirmation of room changes; details on talk room capacities) Reply-To: In-Reply-To: 20140807145739.gp5...@outflux.net On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 07:57:39AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 07:37:35PM -0400, Carl Karsten wrote: On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Kees Cook k...@debian.org wrote: On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 02:19:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Not a show stopper regarding video, each room needs 2mb to the Net for the live stream each room needs 30mb from talk room to NOC file server to keep the raw files nice and save and available, but a simple usb2 drive can sneaker-net the data around if needed. Okay, perfect. So we have some flexibility, even if sub-optimal, here. Related to this, I was asked to find out how many and what kinds of switches are available for videoteam use. Also, videoteam will need a file server located in the NOC for storing the video files. Videoteam will need 2TB of RAID and a spare disk for backups. afaik, there is not currently a machine or drives available for this. Is there any chance one can be borrowed or put together locally? Installation and configuration of such a machine would be handled by videoteam. Assembly too, if need be. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
[Debconf-team] available switches? (was Re: confirmation of room changes; details on talk room capacities)
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 07:57:39AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 07:37:35PM -0400, Carl Karsten wrote: On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Kees Cook k...@debian.org wrote: On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 02:19:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Not a show stopper regarding video, each room needs 2mb to the Net for the live stream each room needs 30mb from talk room to NOC file server to keep the raw files nice and save and available, but a simple usb2 drive can sneaker-net the data around if needed. Okay, perfect. So we have some flexibility, even if sub-optimal, here. Related to this, I was asked to find out how many and what kinds of switches are available for videoteam use. Also, videoteam will need a file server located in the NOC for storing the video files. Videoteam will need 2TB of RAID and a spare disk for backups. afaik, there is not currently a machine or drives available for this. Is there any chance one can be borrowed or put together locally? Installation and configuration of such a machine would be handled by videoteam. Assembly too, if need be. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
[Debconf-team] Request for Videoteam Budget increase
The DebConf Videoteam requests a budget increase for DebConf 14. Shipping cost Chicago - Portland of Carl Karsten's gear:$2000 Rental of screens, projectors and PA speakers for 3 rooms: $900 Purchase of hdmi to vga converters for presenters' laptops:$200 Buffer for miscellaneous expenses: (duct tape, batteries, unexpected/broken stuff, etc) $500 - Total: $3600 Except for the rental items noted above, Carl's gear includes all the cameras, tripods, audio mixers, microphones, twinpacts, laptops, cables and other gear required for Videoteam to cover 3 rooms. -Eric Rzewnicki, on behalf of DebConf Videoteam ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] Request for Videoteam Budget increase
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 01:09:22PM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: The DebConf Videoteam requests a budget increase for DebConf 14. Shipping cost Chicago - Portland of Carl Karsten's gear:$2000 Rental of screens, projectors and PA speakers for 3 rooms: $900 Purchase of hdmi to vga converters for presenters' laptops:$200 Buffer for miscellaneous expenses: (duct tape, batteries, unexpected/broken stuff, etc) $500 - Total: $3600 Except for the rental items noted above, Carl's gear includes all the cameras, tripods, audio mixers, microphones, twinpacts, laptops, cables and other gear required for Videoteam to cover 3 rooms. -Eric Rzewnicki, on behalf of DebConf Videoteam I had the wrong domain for debconf-chairs in my first mail. I've resent the mail to debconf-cha...@debian.org -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
[Debconf-video] Request for Videoteam Budget increase
The DebConf Videoteam requests a budget increase for DebConf 14. Shipping cost Chicago - Portland of Carl Karsten's gear:$2000 Rental of screens, projectors and PA speakers for 3 rooms: $900 Purchase of hdmi to vga converters for presenters' laptops:$200 Buffer for miscellaneous expenses: (duct tape, batteries, unexpected/broken stuff, etc) $500 - Total: $3600 Except for the rental items noted above, Carl's gear includes all the cameras, tripods, audio mixers, microphones, twinpacts, laptops, cables and other gear required for Videoteam to cover 3 rooms. -Eric Rzewnicki, on behalf of DebConf Videoteam ___ Debconf-video mailing list Debconf-video@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-video
Re: [Debconf-video] [Debconf-team] Request for Videoteam Budget increase
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 01:09:22PM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: The DebConf Videoteam requests a budget increase for DebConf 14. Shipping cost Chicago - Portland of Carl Karsten's gear:$2000 Rental of screens, projectors and PA speakers for 3 rooms: $900 Purchase of hdmi to vga converters for presenters' laptops:$200 Buffer for miscellaneous expenses: (duct tape, batteries, unexpected/broken stuff, etc) $500 - Total: $3600 Except for the rental items noted above, Carl's gear includes all the cameras, tripods, audio mixers, microphones, twinpacts, laptops, cables and other gear required for Videoteam to cover 3 rooms. -Eric Rzewnicki, on behalf of DebConf Videoteam I had the wrong domain for debconf-chairs in my first mail. I've resent the mail to debconf-cha...@debian.org -edrz ___ Debconf-video mailing list Debconf-video@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-video
Re: [Debconf-team] Website to watch streaming of the DebConf14
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:56:36PM -0400, Carl Karsten wrote: On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com wrote: It's probably worth mentioning that Summit, which we're using this year, has built-in support for linking IRC channels and video in-line in the page for each session. To be clear, do you mean the icecast_url field in summit.schedule.Room ? My question was to Steve wrt Summit ... has built-in support ... in-line. All I've seen so far in Summit is a field to put a URL in. Nonetheless, your answer is interesting. No. It is yet another code base. It is both streaming server and django website to build a central page of streams that shows images taken from each stream every 5 seconds. Plus a bunch of other features like js irc chat on the same page. You can find the source in https://github.com/timvideos. http://timvideos.us/ is an instance of it. Currently there is no event streaming, and because it dynamicaly builds the main page based on the talk schedule, it doesn't look like much. If someone wants to make it better let me know and I'll document out how to bring up a dev instance with dummy streams. from what I've found so far that just displays a link to some external place to view the live stream. Valessio is talking about making a nice looking page that we could link to from there. It will make it easy for viewers to watch directly in their browsers and provide other nice stuff. I haven't yet found that kind of functionality in summit. If you have, please point me at it. If there are tools other than those currently in place which you would like us to use, perhaps you can do that integration in Summit, so we don't accidentally end up with multiple pages with different IRC/video views? https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/Summit I'm getting decently comfortable with the summit code. So, I can likely help if we decide to integrate Valessio's work directly into summit. Just pointing to his creation from the schedule is probably sufficient, though, and less work. -edrz -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] Website to watch streaming of the DebConf14
(Cc:ing debconf-video) On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 08:59:07PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:25:36PM -0400, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote: I'm thinking of using similar tools (cortado[4], html+css, html5 tagvideo) similar code of the previous editions, however, in place of IRC webchat.oftc, wanting to try the scrollback[5], being a free tool which integrates with social networking and IRC. Also is open to other suggestions and collaborations. Bring the contents of transmission DebConf14 a larger number of developers and contributors. Could you take a look at http://timvideos.us/ ? We're running video for a conference right now, so you can see real things going on. You can find the source in https://github.com/timvideos. You may want to hack this one and have it integrated to other tools of your preference. Anyway, you're also free to use other stuff as you did great for past DCs. You can talk to me directly if you need quick responses in pt_BR, I'm becoming quite involved with video team from next days so I may be useful on this. It's probably worth mentioning that Summit, which we're using this year, has built-in support for linking IRC channels and video in-line in the page for each session. To be clear, do you mean the icecast_url field in summit.schedule.Room ? from what I've found so far that just displays a link to some external place to view the live stream. Valessio is talking about making a nice looking page that we could link to from there. It will make it easy for viewers to watch directly in their browsers and provide other nice stuff. I haven't yet found that kind of functionality in summit. If you have, please point me at it. If there are tools other than those currently in place which you would like us to use, perhaps you can do that integration in Summit, so we don't accidentally end up with multiple pages with different IRC/video views? https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/Summit I'm getting decently comfortable with the summit code. So, I can likely help if we decide to integrate Valessio's work directly into summit. Just pointing to his creation from the schedule is probably sufficient, though, and less work. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-video] [Debconf-team] Website to watch streaming of the DebConf14
(Cc:ing debconf-video) On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 08:59:07PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:25:36PM -0400, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote: I'm thinking of using similar tools (cortado[4], html+css, html5 tagvideo) similar code of the previous editions, however, in place of IRC webchat.oftc, wanting to try the scrollback[5], being a free tool which integrates with social networking and IRC. Also is open to other suggestions and collaborations. Bring the contents of transmission DebConf14 a larger number of developers and contributors. Could you take a look at http://timvideos.us/ ? We're running video for a conference right now, so you can see real things going on. You can find the source in https://github.com/timvideos. You may want to hack this one and have it integrated to other tools of your preference. Anyway, you're also free to use other stuff as you did great for past DCs. You can talk to me directly if you need quick responses in pt_BR, I'm becoming quite involved with video team from next days so I may be useful on this. It's probably worth mentioning that Summit, which we're using this year, has built-in support for linking IRC channels and video in-line in the page for each session. To be clear, do you mean the icecast_url field in summit.schedule.Room ? from what I've found so far that just displays a link to some external place to view the live stream. Valessio is talking about making a nice looking page that we could link to from there. It will make it easy for viewers to watch directly in their browsers and provide other nice stuff. I haven't yet found that kind of functionality in summit. If you have, please point me at it. If there are tools other than those currently in place which you would like us to use, perhaps you can do that integration in Summit, so we don't accidentally end up with multiple pages with different IRC/video views? https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/Summit I'm getting decently comfortable with the summit code. So, I can likely help if we decide to integrate Valessio's work directly into summit. Just pointing to his creation from the schedule is probably sufficient, though, and less work. -edrz ___ Debconf-video mailing list Debconf-video@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-video
Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf14 Bursaries Team: update
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 03:46:54AM -0700, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello team, A quick update on where we are and next steps. We are mostly done with the ranking/scoring, but we are a little bit behind the schedule. This Monday (2014-05-26) I will finish the review of our scores and the Bursaries will discuss the final details to try to get a consensus in terms of approvals and rejections, and hopefully in 2-3 days I should be able to start notifying people (with good or bad news). I will keep -team up-to-date on our next steps and timeline. Any word on this? -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] [Debconf-data-commits] r3694 - dc13/website
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 06:06:39PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: On Mittwoch, 29. August 2012, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: + h3SUPPORTER/h3 + liLogo on our website/li this is plain wrong, please fix ASAP. - pStarting from 5000 USD./p + pStarting from 6000 CHF./p - pStarting from 12500 USD./p + pStarting from 12000 CHF./p - pStarting from USD 25000./p + pStarting from CHF 25000./p is that what we agreed on? afaik we still havent agreed on anything, so... pIn plain, short english: ul + lisupporter = logo on website/li wrong as well, see above. thanks for your work, but opposed to the sponsorship brochure, this is public, right? It's only in svn so far. debconf13.debconf.org doesn't yet exist. So, it's no more public than the sponsorship brochure which is also still only in svn, as far as I know. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] And regarding the Penta replacement
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:55:22AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: Am 14.08.2012 09:25, schrieb Eric Dantan Rzewnicki: - Resources? I can have this on a VM of my personal machine, but I'd very much rather if we have a instance where more people can log in and hack on it. A DebConf machine? A Debian machine? Would be good. But *please* not a painfully underpowered instance as Cletus (the test instance for Penta), it only makes stuff harder. A DebConf machine. We are currently in progress getting a new (big) one, as a replacement for the host where cletus (and more) is on. I intend to have one (or more) VMs up on that where we can play with it. As said multiple times in IRC already. Timeframe is one, two weeks, by now. It's been one week now. Do you expect it to be ready next week? -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] And regarding the Penta replacement
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 06:22:43PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: Now, what do we need to get this working? - More people involved. I'm very bad at managing my time and have several projects going on, so I know I will fail if I do this myself. Who are the Ruby coders amongst us, besides Gunnar, who are willing and able to spend time on frab? -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] And regarding the Penta replacement
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 06:22:43PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: I forgot to mention this in my last message. I was highlighted while my network was acting up on me. I have looked *very little* at this point, but it's fundamental for us to work on it soon. Yes, indeed. If replacing penta is going to happen, it can't wait. So, during the work about it we had at DC12, we had two apparent runner-ups: Frab and Zookeepr. If I am to be seen as the driver for the change, I'm clearly for Frab, for a linguistic issue: I have failed to love Python, and feel quite at ease with Ruby. Frab looks as a clean, neat implementation. I have failed to love Ruby. It has just occurred to me, though, that my introduction to the language coincided with my attempt to comprehend Pentabarf. So, I'm willing to try again. In any case, I haven't seen anything since dc12 from anyone else here about trying out any of the other options. So, fwiw I'm inclined to say he who will lead the work shall choose the tools. I have not yet done a even test install of it (I'm creating a VM for it right now). I expect to have it ready soon, and I'll start looking at what we have, what we need. Has anyone else done even that much for zookeepr? I expect not to be the only one doing this. That _really_ ought not happen. It wouldn't be good for you and it wouldn't be good for DebConf. There has to be a team doing this. Now, what do we need to get this working? - More people involved. I'm very bad at managing my time and have several projects going on, so I know I will fail if I do this myself. I need something to work on and replacing penta is what currently seems most likely to keep me motivated to get involved in DebConf work again. - Resources? I can have this on a VM of my personal machine, but I'd very much rather if we have a instance where more people can log in and hack on it. A DebConf machine? A Debian machine? Would be good. But *please* not a painfully underpowered instance as Cletus (the test instance for Penta), it only makes stuff harder. Can we get a comparison from admin@ of Cletus' and Skinner's resources? Also, it would be good to have an idea of skinner's peak resource usage during critical periods of the DebConf annual cycle. Depending on what we need, I might possibly be able to contribute a machine at least for the hacking phase. And... Well, we shall later see what else. My proposed roadplan would be to set up a system with no data migration from Penta (to start fresh), Starting fresh sounds like a very good idea to me, too. I think that much of what needs to be preserved from penta can be exported to some static site(s). I can't imagine we need to try to shoehorn all of penta's data into frab. have everything ready for other DebConfers to register and point out the bits that need work. Maybe that would need a RT queue to keep track of? Some form of issue tracker would seem to me a necessity. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] DC13 sponsoring brochure, please review sections Debian and DebConf
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 05:41:00AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 24/07/12 02:01, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:20:02PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: Please review my changes both with regard to content as for english language improvements. I commited some attempts at that. It wasn't in the sections included here (so maybe this is off topic), but the full file mentions Switzerland as being an onerous destination. To my mind's ear onerous connotes worse than I suspect you might intend. (?) onerous is definitely not the word to use What is the URL for the repo so I can look over the whole file? https://alioth.debian.org/scm/?group_id=30975 or http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debconf-data/dc13/sponsorship-brochure/ -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] DC13 sponsoring brochure, please review sections Debian and DebConf
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:20:02PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: Please review my changes both with regard to content as for english language improvements. I commited some attempts at that. Gaudenz \subsection{Debian is Choice} Debian is known for its adherence to the Unix and Free Software philosophies, and for its coverage -- the current release includes over 20,000 software packages for more than 10 computer architectures, http://www.debian.org/ says over 29,000 at the moment. Roughly how many will be in wheezy? It wasn't in the sections included here (so maybe this is off topic), but the full file mentions Switzerland as being an onerous destination. To my mind's ear onerous connotes worse than I suspect you might intend. (?) Also not included here is a quote about DC6 from roblimo. I wonder if something more recent would be better, if it exists. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-discuss] [penta] Evaluating new conference software
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:16:43PM -0400, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote: Hi, To follow up on the post-Penta BoF, I've created this wiki page to coordinate evaluating replacements: http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/PentaReplacements Please read, evaluate, email, and help decide! Even better if you can do much of this ahead of Thursday's meeting so that we have a base to work from. Anyone on -discuss who wants to ignore this: I'm encouraging mails about this to start their Subject lines with [penta] for easy filtering. Thanks to everyone! I heard today about another possibility that might be worth considering: symposiun. It's a python/django app written for PyCon and DjangoCon. Apparantly it's been used for some other confs as well. I added it to the wiki. -edrz ___ Debconf-discuss mailing list Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
Re: [Debconf-discuss] [penta] Evaluating new conference software
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:16:43PM -0400, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote: Hi, To follow up on the post-Penta BoF, I've created this wiki page to coordinate evaluating replacements: http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/PentaReplacements Please read, evaluate, email, and help decide! Even better if you can do much of this ahead of Thursday's meeting so that we have a base to work from. Anyone on -discuss who wants to ignore this: I'm encouraging mails about this to start their Subject lines with [penta] for easy filtering. Thanks to everyone! Rumour has it that a discussion occured over dinner (or around the pool?) last night. Could someone post a summary for those who weren't able to be present? Thanks, edrz ___ Debconf-discuss mailing list Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
Re: specimen and phat
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 04:28:02PM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Hi Eric, do you still want to adopt specimen and phat? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555190 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=391134 If not I would like to do it and upload them to pkg-multimedia-maintainers repo best regards Go ahead and do it. -edrz ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [Debconf-team] on talk duration, the LCA model (45 + 15 mins)
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:50:52PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: On 01/27/2011 08:41 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: being currently at LCA 2011 for the first time in my life, I'm naturally inclined to look for best practices that we might want to adopt for DebConf. Here is one: have talks slot of 45 minutes + 15 minutes of *break* before the start of the next talk. I like this model more than the 1 hour model we have at DebConf for various reasons: At dc10, we did 55 minutes + 5 minute breaks. The overwhelming consensus was that this was a serious mistake. Something like what zack is proposing (45+15) would have been much better. In addition to the good arguments zack made, i'll add one more: * time for the video team to actually take a bit of a break, rather than scrambling continuously between talks. votes++ ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: separate discussion and development lists
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:10:45AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 21:21:02 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Is/was DeMuDi a derivative work like debian-multimedia? If so I agree it is easiest to avoid it. If DeMuDi is/was a Debian-internal initiative similar to debian-edu, or those active in it are/was interested in passing it on to Debian, then I still find it interesting to consider using that name as I believe it is well known also outside Debian. Quoting wikipedia: DeMuDi was developed by the AGNULA Project, a European Union funded project to improve access to multimedia software, and was also known as A/DeMuDi, with A standing for Agnula. When funding ceased volunteers continued to work on the project for a short time, but it has now been completely absorbed into the Debian Multimedia Project. not sure about the last part, but it seems it was some kind of derivative work. What about turning it into a Debian-internal initiative? The name might be dead, but we can still revive it as a Debian Blend, can't we? Sorry for jumping into the middle of a thread without reading all of what came before and after. In case it hasn't been said, aiui DeMuDi was implemented as a CDD. Free was frequently to be read saying something like think of it as a custom way of installing Debian to get a well working audio workstation. After the end of the funded period ended all, or nearly all, of the work was merged back into Debian proper. -edrz ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: separate discussion and development lists
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:08:20PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 17/08/10 11:58, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 20:15:40 (CEST), Andreas Tille wrote: On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:10:45AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: I've had a small private followup conversation with Andreas about this. He basically came up with the suggestion to turn debian-multime...@lists.debian.org from a *development* oriented mailing list to a *user* focused list. This way users can share their thoughts, concerns and kudos. I thought this was the idea the whole time? While I don't think that this will significantly lower the amount of traffic (well, we actually widen the set of topics), I still think that it will be benefitial for pkg-multimedia, because: - we get more contact with our actual users - we learn what's pressing and bugging them - we hopefully get more potential and real contributors, ideally even new developers WDYT? Every time I think about it, I like it more. I think we should do that. And announce it to the world via d-d-a. I also think this is a good idea. -edrz ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: separate discussion and development lists
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 06:30:11PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:58:43PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: I've had a small private followup conversation with Andreas about this. He basically came up with the suggestion to turn debian-multime...@lists.debian.org from a *development* oriented mailing list to a *user* focused list. This way users can share their thoughts, concerns and kudos. Sounds good to me. I also digged out some mails from the archive with subject closing down debian-multimedia alioth project and l.d.o list, dating back to April 2009. I think I started that thread. At the time the team was pretty small. Just to be clear, I like the new plan to re-purpose it as a user support list better than my previous idea of closing it down. I'm not entirely sure the release team is happy if we'll upload 17 packages just because of a maintainer's email address change, but given the long release cycle, I see no other way if we want to use debian-multime...@l.d.o, unless it's acceptable to see a bug reports now and then on this list. BTW: Many of these packages are pretty old, e.g. no new upload since 2007 for hexter. They are also not available on git.debian.org. It might be a good first step for beginners to get some experience with git, git-buildpackage, team guidelines (multiline fields) and housekeeping in general to help with these 17 packages. WDYT? ;) I would like to work on those. I've been meaning to work on packaging and becoming a DD for many years ... I really wanted to be more involved this year, but life and DebConf sort of got in the way. So, I'll try to get caught up on the rest of this thread to see what others think and have decided. But, if it's still thought to be ok to keep these packages around, I would like to work on them as a learning exercise. -edrz ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [Debconf-team] Bug#592170: please add debconf delegates to intro/organisation
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 05:19:56PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: On 08/09/2010 05:05 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: I've just gotten home and am probably going afk for some relaxation soon. But, I wanted to point out that only a few members of the DC10 localteam were active in the debian vs debconf discussion (event 658). I hope that more of them can and will contribute to the September discussion. I haven't yet watched any video of the BoF, as i'm currently taking care of other work. Could someone tell me where to find info on what i should be paying attention to in september? I think the idea is to have a more complete and thorough discussion of the relationship between debian and debconf on list(s) in September. I was in the room ... but, somehow too tired and emotionally overwrought to participate in or process much of what was said. I'll need to watch the video to get a better idea. So, the details of which list(s) and who will start and frame the discussion are not clear to me. My main memory is that there were a lot of non-local people there and only Pablo and Brian speaking from localteam. Jeremy and I were there, too, but both of us remained silent. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-video] Fixing broken audio in 1078 and 1079
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 06:32:10PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote: Hi! As you might know, two (or more) videos have problems with sound, the pitch isn't correct: http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf10/Videoteam/ReportBug The most likely reason is a sample rate mismatch, that is, data that's actually 44100Hz is presented and played back as 48000Hz. As with tapes or vinyl running at the wrong speed, this alters the pitch. snipped lots of useful and interesting stuff We have the DV files. We should be able to apply a similar fix to those and rerun the trancodings from the fixed DV. Thanks for working on this Adrian. -edrz ___ Debconf-video mailing list Debconf-video@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-video
Re: [Debconf-team] Blog on O'Reilly site about Debconf
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 02:27:59PM -0400, Andy Oram wrote: You are probably all pretty exhausted by now. Unfortunately, I could spend only a few days at the conference. But I wrote up a big report: http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2010/08/report-from-debian-conference.html I got a couple people to do a sanity check, but I can make changes if anyone on this list sees huge bloopers. For minor comments, feel free to get an account and post a comment. I hope I remembered all the right people to thank. Great job! Hi Andy, Thanks for this! and thanks for mentioning the videoteam. :) -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: Ffmpeg : experimental to unstable
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 03:12:30PM +0200, Brent Clark wrote: On 05/08/2010 14:58, Reinhard Tartler wrote: I've talked to the release managers on tuesday about this, and we more or less agreed that it's too late for squeeze. I've tried, but it's no longer in my hands. Thanks for replying and trying. For what it's worth, DebConf10 videoteam is using the experimental ffmpeg packages backported to a squeeze snapshot. dvswitch and ffmpeg2theora both use ffmpeg libraries. Everything is working well. So, it might be feasible to provide backports more broadly. Far from ideal, but, at least it's an option. -edrz ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [Debconf-team] hacklab and davis networking changes to benefit video team
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 09:29:38AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: lots of useful and helpful reports of fixes Thank you for taking care of this. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] available video camera
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 05:38:03PM -0400, Michael Schultheiss wrote: Holger Levsen wrote: Hi Michael, On Donnerstag, 29. Juli 2010, Michael Schultheiss wrote: I have a consumer MiniDV camera I can bring. I arrive in New York on Saturday evening. you're staying til the very end, right? if so, please bring it! My flight home is early August 8. I'll be sure to bring my camera. That's great. Thank you very much. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] [Debconf10-localteam] please review (signing up for volunteering to help with talks)
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 08:06:06PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: On 07/28/2010 07:23 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: Yes, that's true. edrz rightly points out the elevator as a potential source of problems. do we have access to the northern stairwell near interschool? a few flights of stairs between talks will help people work up some body heat to combat the chill :p Aiui, Richard's earlier investigations revealed that the stairs are only available for emergency egress. i.e. you can't go up them and going down them sets off fire alarms. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-discuss] Pollen in NYC
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 09:58:26PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Hi, Now there are some Debian folk on the ground in NYC, I hope somebody can give an idea of what pollen levels are actually like, rather than relying on weather report readings. My hayfever is particularly bad here at the moment, but I'm hoping it will be better in the city and especially with A/C, so if it's not terrible I shan't bother dragging all my various medication with me. I use pollen.com for myself during the high seasons at home in the DC metro area. It covers NYC, too. -edrz ___ Debconf-discuss mailing list Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
Re: [Debconf-discuss] Pollen in NYC
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 06:23:09PM -0400, Wouter Verhelst wrote: On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 09:58:26PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Hi, Now there are some Debian folk on the ground in NYC, I hope somebody can give an idea of what pollen levels are actually like, rather than relying on weather report readings. My hayfever is particularly bad here at the moment, but I'm hoping it will be better in the city and especially with A/C, so if it's not terrible I shan't bother dragging all my various medication with me. I'm not having much problems ATM; but then my worst period is usually around may-june rather than now, anyway. The worst times in USA (maybe elsewhere) are spring when the trees are pollinating (oaks being among the worst) and fall/harvest time when it more weeds and grasses. -edrz ___ Debconf-discuss mailing list Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
Re: [Debconf-team] Security certificate for our website
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:59:55PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:02:29 -0400, Gabriella Coleman bie...@nyu.edu wrote: I would like to send out the debconf schedule to some interested parties, especially to get folks to come to our more general talks, especially the one by Eben Moglen. The problem is that folks visiting our schedule will still get the security warning page and might not proceed to visit the page. Is there any way we can just pay for another certificate so this does not happen?? Point them at this, perhaps? http://penta.debconf.org/dc10_schedule/index.en.html I think she means the ssl cert. not the penta login. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] Missing a meeting
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 09:48:38PM -0400, Adnan Hodzic wrote: I'll miss today's meeting, my cuzin is having a mini party since it's his birthday today. If you end up having the transcript of a meeting I'd be most greatful. Adnan there is just this: http://whiteboard.debian.net/29379a.txt i'll try to get a moment to fill in more details ... -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] [Debconf10-localteam] Local jobs organization and some questions
Did we fill in these roles with specific people? (sorry for top posting) -edrz On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 01:44:56PM -0400, Gabriella Coleman wrote: We'd like to request people to head these categories: - Arrivals Coordinator - Volunteer Coordinator (biella?) - Arrival weekend food coordinator - DebCamp food coordinator (only if we do something different here) - John Jay food coordinator (jeremy?) - Schwag: t-shirts, sponsor bags, banners, and so on Hi folks, So I think breaking this down is a really good idea and I am down for doing the volunteer coordinator if we break it down and have one person also in charge of the various sub-categories where we need volunteers. I can take one of the sub-categories, as well as be in charge of the big picture. I am also going to start trying to corral folks to volunteer in the first place. If there are not enough folks do to this, then there should be at least two folks doing the volunteer coordination because it is the largest job up there (at least I think it is, but perhaps I am mistaken). Currently we need volunteers to do the following tasks, although I have questions for many of them. 1. TalkMeister: Help coordinate talks (make sure they start/end on time, make sure equipment works, though video team can help, and help with Q and A). * Past organizers: how was this handled in past debconfs? 2. Front Desk: Make sure that we have the Front Desked Manned and Wommaned at all times. We might want to have locals always doing this as they can give advice about NY stuff as well. 3. Cleaning: I am still not clear as to whether we will be spending so much money on this that we won't need to do this or whether we will indeed need a handful of folks to help tidy up 2x a day in the hacklab annd lounges. * Mr Beige: Can you update us on this? 4. Tee-Shirt Sales: Sell tee shirts. * Past Organizers: how was this (successful) handled in the past? Did you do this everyday? Most days? Part of the day? 5. Building access: As with the cleaning, I am not sure whether we will need volunteers to take care of this or what this even entails. * Mr Beinge: Can you update us on this? We also need volunteers to stuff attendee bags but I am going to suggest that a whole lot of us do that together while we chat about other things. There were a few other categories but they are taken care of by other teams (outreach, for example) or were collapsed into one. Biella Gabriella Coleman, Assistant Professor Department of Media, Culture, Communication New York University 239 Greene St, 7th floor NY NY 10003 212-992-7696 http://steinhardt.nyu.edu/faculty_bios/view/Gabriella_Coleman ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
[Debconf-team] talk rooms, keys, etc.
Richard delegated talk room access to me yesterday. Which means I have the key for Interschool Lab and Davis Auditorium. I went to check on Davis just after the hacklab opened. The room was unlocked and the lights were on. I'm going back to my room briefly to drop off some things and find my camera. I'll take pictures to document the before state of the rooms before starting to unpack, inventory and set up videoteam gear. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] Please move Debconf video training to beginning
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 01:54:00PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: On 07/20/2010 01:31 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: My thought was mainly to have them in a schedule somewhere. It didn't occur to me that penta wouldn't allow the same event to have multiple instances. I'll put in several training sessions to be scheduled during DebCamp. Thanks. please mark them with the DebCamp track so that they're easier to find. I created 676 and scheduled it for Tuesday the 27th in Interschool. However, it shows up neither in the logged-in nor the exported versions of the schedule. I can create the others (Thursday in Davis ... maybe one other). But, there's not much point if they don't show up, I guess. https://penta.debconf.org/penta/schedule/dc10/track/DebCamp/index.en.html (the logo and index on ^this^ version are messed up) https://penta.debconf.org/dc10_schedule/track/DebCamp/index.en.html -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-team] Please move Debconf video training to beginning
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:27:48AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: On 07/23/2010 08:55 AM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: I created 676 and scheduled it for Tuesday the 27th in Interschool. Thanks for doing this, Eric. However, it shows up neither in the logged-in nor the exported versions of the schedule. I can create the others (Thursday in Davis ... maybe one other). But, there's not much point if they don't show up, I guess. I just checked the Public event box on the scheduling tab. it seems to be showing up now. If you could create and schedule the other video-team training event(s) that would be great. Doh! thanks. sorry about that. I've added 677 as well now. -edrz ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Re: [Debconf-discuss] More questions regarding what to bring for DebConf10 (and other stuff)
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 01:52:53PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote: Hi. I am resending this (with another question appended at the end) because I think that my messages are not getting through. On Jul 22 2010, Rogério Brito wrote: Hi there, people. As a continuation of what one should bring when coming to this year's Debconf, I have some questions: 1 - What type of mains outlets will we use? I faintly remember having read this one, but can't find it again. An A plug? B plug? [1][2] Any other? And the voltage? 127V? [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:A_plug.jpg [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Domestic_AC_Type_B_USA.jpg This and other useful info is available here: http://debconf10.debconf.org/practicalinfo.xhtml -edrz ___ Debconf-discuss mailing list Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss