Unresponsive packagers: suanand and vponcova

Good Morning Everyone, We have been emailing daily the following users to notify that the email they have set in FAS does not correspond to a valid bugzilla account. This is a requirement for Fedora packagers. Does someone know how to contact them? suanand - emailed since April 5th suanand is

Re: convert everything to rpmautospec?

On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 09:18:09AM +0200, Ondrej Mosnáček wrote: > On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 at 16:30, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > [...] > > Let's look at it in another way: would you say that the people who leaved > > in the > > 14th century were liars for sayin

Re: convert everything to rpmautospec?

On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 02:55:36PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [08/04/2024 09:02] : > > > > Well, you and Kevin see "salami tactics" (whatever that may be), > > FTR, I have no idea what "salami tactics" is. > > > while I see normal engineering practice: some new

Re: [Pierre-Yves Chibon] Unresponsive packagers: nknazeko

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 11:20:59AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 10:44:18PM +0100, Vit Mojzis wrote: > > Nikola left Red Hat and hence changed the email address in FAS. I'm > > guessing that only her Red Hat email was tied to a BZ account. > &

Re: [Pierre-Yves Chibon] Unresponsive packagers: nknazeko

On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 10:44:18PM +0100, Vit Mojzis wrote: > Hello Pierre, Hi Vit, Sorry for the late reply > Nikola left Red Hat and hence changed the email address in FAS. I'm > guessing that only her Red Hat email was tied to a BZ account. > I'll try and let her know. Do I understand

Unresponsive packagers: yangrr

Good Morning Everyone, Since January 17th, we have been emailing daily the following user to notify that the email they have set in FAS does not correspond to a valid bugzilla account. This is a requirement for Fedora packagers. Does someone know how to contact yangrr? yangrr is watching

Unresponsive packagers: nknazeko

Good Morning Everyone, Since November 1st, we have been emailing daily the following user to notify that the email they have set in FAS does not correspond to a valid bugzilla account. This is a requirement for Fedora packagers. Does someone know how to contact nknazeko? nknazeko is maintainer

Re: Synching user database from Fedora IPA to pagure

On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 10:13:35AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > I'd like to start writing a script to synch users/groups from Fedora IPA > to pagure.io and src.fp.o: both pagure.io and src.fp.o logins are based > on Fedora accounts, but the Pagure user database is only updated when a

Unresponsive packagers: kubo

Good Morning Everyone, Since June 30th, we have been emailing daily the following user to notify that the email they have set in FAS does not correspond to a valid bugzilla account. This is a requirement for Fedora packagers. Does someone know how to contact kubo? kubo is watching

Re: The new Change discussion process is painful

On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 10:46:04AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 13. 09. 23 v 9:08 Remi Collet napsal(a): > > Le 13/09/2023 à 08:09, Adam Williamson a écrit : > > > On Wed, 2023-09-13 at 05:51 +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > it is really a pain that the

Re: PDC replacement proposal

On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 11:35:19AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 04:51:22PM +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote: > > Hello all, it took us a few years but we are finally getting rid of the PDC > > project. Thanks to the ARC research we identified use cases in our tooling > > and

Re: Cleaning infra groups on Pagure and GitHub

On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:59:12PM +0200, Michal Konecny wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I did a cleaning in Fedora infra groups in both Github (fedora-infra > organization https://github.com/fedora-infra) and Pagure (fedora-infra group > https://pagure.io/group/fedora-infra). I removed the people that

Re: congrats to another new sysadmin-mainer

On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 10:15:58AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I'm happy to announce that We have approved a new member in our > sysadmin-main group: > > adamwill - Adam Williamson Finally! Welcome aboard Adam :) Pierre signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Update on DNF05 in Fedora

On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 11:27:37AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 08:41:42AM -0400, Samantha Bueno wrote: > > I want to close on a positive note and commend my team for the incredible > > amount of hard work they have poured into this project thus far, as well as > > people

Re: congrats to our new sysadmin-mainer

On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 01:20:42PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I'm happy to announce that We have approved a new member in our > sysadmin-main group: > > darknao - Francois Andrieu > > This is the core group of trusted folks that high level access to most > everything in fedora infrastructure. >

Re: clean up on aisle pagure.io

On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 02:17:34PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Hey folks. > > So, a few weeks back I noticed some spam projects on pagure.io. > So, I cleaned up about 165 of them and deactivated 165 spam users. I took out a few a week or so ago, but not as many, I'm impressed :) > Now, I see

Re: planet

On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 07:22:57PM -0300, Pedro Moura wrote: > > > > Yeah, hopefully. It might be possible to reach out to those groups... > > design, security? They have irc rooms, we could try asking there? > > > > Due to time zone differences and the possibility of some users not seeing > my

Re: planet

On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 07:44:13PM -, Pedro Moura wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 12:22:59PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > One thing to keep in mind is that from time to time people are having > > multiple > > blogs in their .planet.ini. We could check on fedorapeople how often this >

Re: planet

On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 12:22:59PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 6:05 PM Pedro Moura wrote: > > > > Instead of users having to SSH and create a .planet file to add their > > blogs, the idea would be simply add their blogs to Fedora Accounts. The > > fields in Fedora Accounts

Non-responsive packagers: sbluhm, shaneallcroft

Good Morning Everyone, The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS matches an existing bugzilla account. Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per:

Re: Nonresponsive maintainers ( was Re: Red Hat Bugzilla mail FAS field is now handled correctly by Bugzilla sync scripts )

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 05:10:15PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 02:49:10PM +0100, Michal Konecny wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > TL;DR; Check if you have correct e-mail in Red Hat Bugzilla Mail field in > > Fedora Accounts [0]. Empty mail is also OK. > > > > the Red Hat

Re: Rethinking fedora websites deployment

On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 07:25:03PM +0100, darknao wrote: > > > On 2022-11-24 18:58, Jan K wrote: > > What is likelyhood of Openshift going down? A would be best > > solution if stable enough. > > > > copperi > > > > Openshift is quite stable. But everything around it may not. Having a >

Re: F39 proposal: Replace DNF with DNF5 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 10:36:52AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 10/12/22 17:47, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 at 10:32, Kevin P. Fleming > > wrote: > > > > On 10/12/22 08:59, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > Maybe call it the

Re: RHEL9 migration

On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 11:35:09AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 04:04:41PM +0200, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 3:20 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 3:01 PM Stephen Smoogen > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 26

Re: Inactive provenpackagers to be removed from group

On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 02:07:08PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > In accordance with FESCo policy[1], the following provenpackagers will > be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a lack of Koji builds > submitted in the last six months. If you received this directly, you > can reply off-list to

Re: Debugging Datanommer performance issues

On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 10:49:50AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 09:51:06AM +0200, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > > Hey folks! > > > > There's been a report of queries long enough to cause a timeout in > > datagrepper: > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/datagrepper/issues/467 >

Re: congrats to our new sysadmin-mainers

On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 07:56:29AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I'm happy to announce that We have approved several folks into the > sysadmin-main group: > > nphilipp - Nils Philippsen > zlopez - Michal Konečný > ryanlerch - Ryan Lerch > > This is the core group of trusted folks that high level

Re: Non-responsive packagers: benzea

On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 11:30:07AM +0200, Benjamin Berg wrote: > Hi, > > sorry for not dealing with this earlier. I was somewhat out for a > while, and didn't give the mail much significance. > > What happened is that I'll be leaving Red Hat. As a first step, I > changed my FAS email address

Re: Non-responsive packagers: benzea

case). Hi Tomáš, Thanks for pointing this out, that's what I get for re-using an old email as template :( The correct user is benzea indeed. Thanks for pointing him to this thread! Pierre > On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 9:59 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: > > > Good Morning Everyone, >

Non-responsive packagers: michaelanguskelly

Good Morning Everyone, The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS matches an existing bugzilla account. Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per:

Re: Email replies to src.fpo notifications

On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 10:53:30AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 08:13:23PM -, Frank R Dana Jr. wrote: > > Recently, after receiving an email notification regarding a pull request at > > src.fedoraproject.org, I attempted[1] to update the discussion via email > > reply

Re: Software Bill of Materials for Fedora

On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 12:53:57PM +1000, Jason Shepherd wrote: > Hello Fedora Infrastructure team, > > Red Hat Product Security are building an application called Component > Registry to meet the requirements set out in the recent Executive Order > 14028 [1], "Improving the Nation's

Re: Once again, more than 8 days delayed notifications

On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 09:36:14AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 at 09:25, Ralf Corsépius wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I thought the notification delay mess was fixed. Apparently, I was wrong. > > > > > > No, I believe the service which is behind these emails is called FMN. It

Re: Once again, more than 8 days delayed notifications

On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 05:16:55PM +0200, Ralf Corsépius wrote: > > > Am 09.07.22 um 15:36 schrieb Stephen Smoogen: > > > > > > On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 at 09:25, Ralf Corsépius > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I thought the notification delay mess was fixed.

Re: [RFC] Build tag in RPM: from NVR to NVRB

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 12:27:57AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 12:15 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 3:48 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 01:05:31PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > > > The most

Re: openshift 3->4 moves status and info needed

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 12:25:08PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 15. 06. 22 v 1:49 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > > Greetings everyone. > > > > I finally had a quiet afternoon to really dig into the ocp3->4 > > migration. > > > > We have a total of 64 unique applications/projects over the 4

Re: on rpms

On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 06:24:10PM +0200, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > > Something like: > >> > >> Applications in Fedora Infrastructure may be deployed via non rpm > >> methods (as long as they obey licensing guidelines ( > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Licensing )). For those >

Non-responsive packagers: michaelanguskelly

Good Morning Everyone, The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS matches an existing bugzilla account. Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per:

Re: FBR: update mirror ip addresses for kernel.org

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 02:34:57PM +, Mark O'Brien wrote: > Hi All, > > We have had a request from the people at mirrors.kernel.org to update their > IP address: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10598 > > This PR should take care of it >

Re: Can't fedpkg new-sources (403)

On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 01:45:52PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: >On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:38 PM Neal Becker <[1]ndbeck...@gmail.com> >wrote: > > I believe it is failing on the line: >   File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/lookaside.py", line > 298, in upload >

Re: Freeze Break Request

On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 02:18:09PM +, Mark O'Brien wrote: > Hi All, > > There are a few of our proxies in AWS that are giving us errors which I > believe are related to low memory. I would like to reinstall a few of > these. I would do one at a time so disruption should be minimal. There is a

Re: Do we have any policy for disabling inactive users

On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 10:29:54AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Il 11/02/22 20:24, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 11:33:13AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > >> Il 11/02/22 12:20, Florian Weimer ha scritto: > >>> * Mattia Verga via devel: > >>> > Il

Re: Do we have any policy for disabling inactive users

On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 11:24:24AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 11:33:13AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > > Il 11/02/22 12:20, Florian Weimer ha scritto: > > > * Mattia Verga via devel: > > > > > >> Il 11/02/22 10:41, Miro Hrončok ha scritto: > > >>> On 11. 02. 22

Re: Non-responsive packagers: lef, msehnout, shaneallcroft

On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 10:47:11AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 9:58 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to > > either adjust their

Non-responsive packagers: lef, msehnout, shaneallcroft

Good Morning Everyone, The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS matches an existing bugzilla account. Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per:

Re: Action Required: Bugzilla - API Authentication changes

On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 01:41:01PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 01. 02. 22 13:37, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi Miro, > > > > Thanks for forwarding this announcement. > > Apparently the talk about "improving communication between RHBZ and > > the Fedora Project" has not born fruit yet. ;) > >

Re: Non-responsive packagers: anoopcs, gtiwari, msehnout, sebix, vanessa_kris

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 02:31:57PM +0530, Anoop C S wrote: > On Thu, 2022-01-20 at 09:57 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking > > them to > > either adjust their

Re: Non-responsive packagers: anoopcs, gtiwari, msehnout, sebix, vanessa_kris

On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 10:04:25AM +, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hello, > > > - vanessa_kris contacted since December 10th > > > > vanessa_kris is main admin of rpms/python-git-changelog > > vanessa_kris has a bugzilla override on rpms/python-git-changelog > > vanessa_kris is main admin of

Non-responsive packagers: anoopcs, gtiwari, msehnout, sebix, vanessa_kris

Good Morning Everyone, The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS matches an existing bugzilla account. Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per:

Re: Workflow and other problems with the Fedora container infrastructure

On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 08:42:30AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >On Sat, Jan 15, 2022, 6:57 PM Kevin Fenzi <[1]ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 02:14:19PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > One of the things that has recently happened in the Koji space is the >

Re: Sysadmin - main group

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 12:36:15PM +, Mark O'Brien wrote: > I'm happy to announce that We have added a new member to the > sysadmin-main group: > > Saffronique - David Kirwan > > This is the core group of trusted folks that have high level access to > almost everything in fedora

Re: sourcegraph and src.fedoraproject.org

On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 07:10:31PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > Sourcegraph is planning to, very shortly, start cloning all non fork repos > from src.fedoraproject.org as well as asking the Pagure API for the metadata > of those repos. Their user agent for API requests is `Sourcegraph-Bot` and >

Re: [FBR] Update pagure to 5.13.3

On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 11:07:26AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 11:06 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: > > > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > This morning, I have cut a new release of pagure: 5.13.3 with the following > > changelog: >

[FBR] Update pagure to 5.13.3

Good Morning Everyone, This morning, I have cut a new release of pagure: 5.13.3 with the following changelog: - Warn users when a PR contains some characters - srcfpo theme: Change "Packages" link to new packages website (Brendan Early) - srcfpo theme: left-align the lines in description

Non-responsive packager: kasong

Good Morning Everyone, The packager listed here has been receiving a daily email asking them to either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS matches an existing bugzilla account. Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per:

Re: Using YubiKey for accounts.fedoraproject.org OTP?

On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 03:27:43PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello, > > I've been trying to add the OPT token from accounts.fedoraproject.org to my > yubikey. I get a QR code and a otpauth://totp/username?secret=xxx URI. > > I copypasted the xxx secret (56 characters: digits and uppercase

Re: Fedora  Java: The Death of Two SIGs

On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 10:57:12AM +0200, Peter Boy wrote: > > > > Am 27.09.2021 um 10:47 schrieb Ankur Sinha : > > > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 21:20:07 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >> Should the @java-maint-sig group be removed from any packages it is > >> still associated with? Should it be

Re: FBR: run batcave playbook for rbac

On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 03:08:12PM +0100, Mark O'Brien wrote: > Hi All, > > I am requesting permissions to run the batcave > playbook to update rbac permissions to allow the > sysadmin-analysis group run the logserver playbook > as requested in this ticket: > >

Non-responsive packager: michelmno

Good Morning Everyone, The packager listed here has been receiving a daily email asking them to either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS matches an existing bugzilla account. Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per:

Re: How to get list of retired packages?

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 02:36:58PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Hi. > > What is the best way to get list of retired packages in F35? I can get list > of all retired packages by scanning dist-git. But if I want it for one > release of Fedora? And I do not want to do that manually; I rather want

Re: Freeze Break Request: Blockerbugs Hotfix to Deal With RHBZ Change

On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 01:12:07PM -, Kamil Páral wrote: > > For now, I've kept the limit to 20 because I was having trouble getting > > more than 20 > > to work for me. > > For anyone interested - we found out that only logged-in users can receive > more than 20 responses per query. For

Re: Freeze Break Request: Blockerbugs Hotfix to Deal With RHBZ Change

On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 12:49:21PM -0600, Tim Flink wrote: > It turns out that the configuration for rhbz was changed without an > announcement and now the max number of bugs returned for any query is 20. > Some of the queries that we use in blockerbugs return more than 20 bugs so I > have a

Re: Freeze Break Request: more ipsilon/sssd debugging

On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 01:44:45PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 13:34, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > So, it turns out the additional debugging we setup in that sssd package > > on the ipsilon servers isn't sufficent to show what the problem is. ;( > > > > sssd

Re: Freeze Break Request: OSBS docker

On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 03:06:45PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Some of you may be aware of: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10145 > > TLDR: some new syscalls in f35+ make docker in our OSBS cluster fail > some new syscalls. This means we have had no new f35/rawhide based OSBS >

Re: FAS email for authentication

On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 11:13:19AM -0400, Christopher wrote: > Why does FAS use the email forwarding address when I use it to > authenticate, rather than the permanent @fedoraproject.org alias for > the address? > > I should be able to change my forwarding address without changing how >

Bochecha unavailable for a little while

Good Morning Everyone, I am in contact with bochecha who has asked me that I announce his un-availability for personal reason for a little while. To this end, he has orphaned the package "buildstream" on Wednesday. There may be more coming. Bochecha still wants to come back to Fedora once things

Re: IRC nicks in account system, FMN and matrix

On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 02:32:05PM +0200, Michal Konecny wrote: > > > On 24. 06. 21 11:51, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > > > > > * Do we want to get noggin to be able to verify nicks first? > > How will the verification works? > > > > > > We don't know yet.  I was thinking of having and

Re: rpmautospec: Invitiation to Test

On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 02:00:00PM +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote: > Hey everybody, > > we've recently deployed the changes needed to enable automatic RPM > release numbers and changelogs to Koji in staging, and now we want you > to throw things at it! > > Detailed information is below, but the

Re: why some package are retired and others are retired without be orphan ?

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 01:53:47PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:11:37AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Hi, > > > > while https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/projectM-jack is retired , > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pub

Re: why some package are retired and others are retired without be orphan ?

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:11:37AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > > while https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/projectM-jack is retired , > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/publican-fedora and https://src.fedo > raproject.org/rpms/gdesklets have the button orphan , why ? Because they

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed from their packages

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 03:25:01PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > When we rolled out the new AAA solution a few weeks ago, some accounts have > not > been migrated: > - Accounts that have been set inactive by their owner > - Accounts that are

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: nando pavlix

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:51:35AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 19. 04. 21 10:52, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 03:12:34PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > > > The packagers listed here have been

Re: account system group deletions

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:29:41AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > I thought I would bring up for dicussion here something thats come up > after the new account system has been put in place. > > Namely, how do we handle group deletions. > In the FAS2 world, we never deleted

Re: Disabling BZ `fedora_requires_release_note` flag

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 09:11:19AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 4:13 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > What about the unused "qa contact field"? Kevin suggested dropping > > qa-extras [1], but it never went anywhere, afaics? > > > Good idea. I have a few other

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: nando pavlix

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 03:12:34PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to > either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS > matches an existing b

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: liangwen12year nando pavlix zoglesby

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 01:41:41PM -, Zach Oglesby wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 9:19 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon > > > Huh. That still exists? What a throwback! > > > > I sent a tweet in zoglesby's direction. He posted about a week ago, so > > hopefu

Inactive packagers to be removed from their packages

Good Morning Everyone, When we rolled out the new AAA solution a few weeks ago, some accounts have not been migrated: - Accounts that have been set inactive by their owner - Accounts that are disabled - Accounts marked as spam This resulted in some packager accounts not being migrated. As a

Inactive packagers to be removed from their packages

Good Morning Everyone, When we rolled out the new AAA solution a few weeks ago, some accounts have not been migrated: - Accounts that have been set inactive by their owner - Accounts that are disabled - Accounts marked as spam This resulted in some packager accounts not being migrated. As a

Non-responsive maintainer: liangwen12year nando pavlix zoglesby

Good Morning Everyone, The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS matches an existing bugzilla account. Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per:

Re: Redirecting and testing the new fedocal in openshift

On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 10:30:25AM +0200, Arnaud wrote: > All of them give me the error. > > I checked in tor browser, and it doesn't do it there. > It must be my firefox configuration (but it is the one I use all the time). > > As it does it only for me it seems (and the ones that use a

Re: Redirecting and testing the new fedocal in openshift

On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 10:09:00AM +0200, Arnaud wrote: > Hello, > > Maybe it is just me, but I am getting: Internal Server Error > if I click on a calendar for: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org/ Could you give a link? All of these work for me: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org/design-FAD/

[PATCH] proxies: redirect apps.fp.o/calendar to calendar.fp.o in openshift

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Yves Chibon --- playbooks/include/proxies-redirects.yml | 6 ++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/playbooks/include/proxies-redirects.yml b/playbooks/include/proxies-redirects.yml index 17a536149..49f2bb418 100644 --- a/playbooks/include/proxies

[PATCH] proxies: redirect apps.fp.o/calendar to calendar.fp.o in openshift

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Yves Chibon --- playbooks/include/proxies-redirects.yml | 6 ++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/playbooks/include/proxies-redirects.yml b/playbooks/include/proxies-redirects.yml index 17a536149..4d5223ad5 100644 --- a/playbooks/include/proxies

Redirecting and testing the new fedocal in openshift

This is both a call for more testing as well as the first FBR of this new freeze. I have deployed fedocal in openshift, using OIDC and fedora-messaging, running on python 3 at: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org I have done some testing and for what I looked at and for everything seems to work

Re: Congrats to Nick Bebout

On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 08:47:54AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > I'm happy to announce that Nick Bebout(fas: nb, irc: nb) > has been added to our sysadmin-main group. > > This is the core group of trusted folks that high level access to most > everything in fedora infrastructure. >

Re: Has dist-git changed/broken in the last few hours?

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 01:52:16PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > $ git pull --rebase > fatal: '/rpms/libguestfs' does not appear to be a git repository > fatal: Could not read from remote repository. > > Please make sure you have the correct access rights > and the repository exists. > >

Fedora 34 Beta Freeze is now over

With the successful release of Fedora 34 beta yesterday we are now out of freeze. Our next planned freeze is 2021-04-06 for Fedora 34 final. Pierre ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

Re: Planned Outage - Fedora Account System Replacement - 2021-03-25 10:30 UTC

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 01:56:46PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > In Copr We use OpenID API in FAS to allow users to log-in, and to gather some > basic info about the user (FAS groups and timezone afair). Will this API work > after the transition? For OpenID, saml or OIDC we rely on ipsilon which

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: kir

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 06:44:21PM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > On ti, 16 maalis 2021, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > Since February 24th the packager kir has been receiving a daily email asking > > them to either adjust their bugzi

Re: Congrats to Tomáš Hrčka

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 02:06:16PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > I'm happy to announce that Tomáš Hrčka (fas: humaton, irc: jednorozec) > has been added to our sysadmin-main group. > > This is the core group of trusted folks that high level access to most > everything in fedora

Non-responsive maintainer: kir

Good Morning Everyone, Since February 24th the packager kir has been receiving a daily email asking them to either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS matches an existing bugzilla account. Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per:

Re: libravatar ported to Fedora's AWS

On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 10:32:23PM +, clime wrote: > Hello, > > I have just finished port of libravatar.org service to server provided > by Fedora. Big thanks to the Fedora project for sponsoring libravatar. > Avatars in pagure.io, src.fp.o, Bodhi should now load much faster. Awesome,

Re: Bodhi client prompting for a password

On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 12:15:53AM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 9:31 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > > > On 03. 03. 21 21:08, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > I want to run this command: > > > > > > > >bodhi updates trigger-tests

Re: ssh git access to src.fedoraproject.org feedback

On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 07:35:00PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 6:12 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 05:26:46PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2021, 5:13 PM Matthew Miller > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 01:53:28PM

Re: Fedora Account System and Bugzilla Mismatch email

On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 11:27:44AM -, Lukas Zapletal wrote: > Hey, > > I got an email asking me to change my fedora email to match my BZ account. > Problem is, in BZ I have to use my redhat account which allows me to be > granted special permissions for RH-related bugs. Fedora wants to do

Re: Fedora 35 Change: rpmautospec - removing release and changelog fields from spec files (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 01:07:44AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 02. 03. 21 22:05, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > The devil is in the details: pre-release, snapinfo, minorbump aren't really > > covered by distance being just an integer bumped. > > I don't see this covered

Re: Fedora 35 Change: rpmautospec - removing release and changelog fields from spec files (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 09:30:41PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 8:20 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 03:38:35PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 3:01 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >

Non-responsive maintainer: sabbaka

Good Morning Everyone, Since February 7th the packager sabbaka has been receiving a daily email asking them to either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS matches an existing bugzilla account. Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per:

Re: Introducing the ARC sub-team in CPE - and first research topic

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 04:25:09PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > While planning work, the CPE team has realized that a number of our > initiatives > actually start with a research phase to find the most appropriate technical > solution. > This

Re: git push on master branch rejected.

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 09:28:53AM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > > > On 2/22/21 2:39 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 05:21:33PM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > >> > >> Thanks you for your rapid reply! > >> > >> On 2/2

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >