# splt up the LO and kio parts properly
clone 1069835 -1
reassign -1 kio
retitle -1 kio: Don't leak existing file handles to newly spanwed KIO
workers
block 1069835 by -1
# LOs part is done, at least for this one.
close 1069835 4:24.2.2-1
thanks
Am 03.05.24 um 10:54 schrieb Andreas B.
# splt up the LO and kio parts properly
clone 1069835 -1
reassign -1 kio
retitle -1 kio: Don't leak existing file handles to newly spanwed KIO
workers
block 1069835 by -1
# LOs part is done, at least for this one.
close 1069835 4:24.2.2-1
thanks
Am 03.05.24 um 10:54 schrieb Andreas B.
Hi,
Am 26.04.24 um 10:02 schrieb Sune Stolborg Vuorela:
https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kio/-/commit/
45b306dc0653fa42672e8a49afe8f42d24585ed4
is also needed for it to work.
Thanks for mentioning this.
As talked about on IRC this morning, that commit is only for kf6s kio.
So unless that
Hi,
Am 26.04.24 um 10:02 schrieb Sune Stolborg Vuorela:
https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kio/-/commit/
45b306dc0653fa42672e8a49afe8f42d24585ed4
is also needed for it to work.
Thanks for mentioning this.
As talked about on IRC this morning, that commit is only for kf6s kio.
So unless that
Hi,
Am 25.04.24 um 18:37 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 05:43:29PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Am 25.04.24 um 17:03 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt:
For now, we traced the issue back to libreoffice-kf5. If this package
is removed, neither the document disappears on closing
Hi,
Am 25.04.24 um 18:37 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 05:43:29PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Am 25.04.24 um 17:03 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt:
For now, we traced the issue back to libreoffice-kf5. If this package
is removed, neither the document disappears on closing
Hi,
Am 25.04.24 um 18:37 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 05:43:29PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Am 25.04.24 um 17:03 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt:
For now, we traced the issue back to libreoffice-kf5. If this package
is removed, neither the document disappears on closing
Hi,
Am 25.04.24 um 17:03 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt:
For now, we traced the issue back to libreoffice-kf5. If this package
is removed, neither the document disappears on closing libreoffice nor
the popup is shown when 'nobrl' is removed from the mount options.
Which doesn't do IO itself
Hi,
Am 25.04.24 um 17:03 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt:
For now, we traced the issue back to libreoffice-kf5. If this package
is removed, neither the document disappears on closing libreoffice nor
the popup is shown when 'nobrl' is removed from the mount options.
Which doesn't do IO itself
Hi,
Am 25.04.24 um 17:03 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt:
For now, we traced the issue back to libreoffice-kf5. If this package
is removed, neither the document disappears on closing libreoffice nor
the popup is shown when 'nobrl' is removed from the mount options.
Which doesn't do IO itself
close 1069835 4:24.2.2-1
forwarded 1069835 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
tag 1069835 + moreinfo
thanks
Am 25.04.24 um 17:03 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt:
Package: libreoffice-kf5
Version?
Severity: grave
Come on... Not downgrading just yet, but I don't believe
close 1069835 4:24.2.2-1
forwarded 1069835 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
tag 1069835 + moreinfo
thanks
Am 25.04.24 um 17:03 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt:
Package: libreoffice-kf5
Version?
Severity: grave
Come on... Not downgrading just yet, but I don't believe
close 1069835 4:24.2.2-1
forwarded 1069835 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
tag 1069835 + moreinfo
thanks
Am 25.04.24 um 17:03 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt:
Package: libreoffice-kf5
Version?
Severity: grave
Come on... Not downgrading just yet, but I don't believe
Hi,
Am 24.04.24 um 21:35 schrieb Peter B:
Why is it bad? The nogui's are lighter dependencies than the gui
packages.
Exactly. That#s why they should be used in package building for
converting stuff.
One or the other is needed. Surely better to use the nogui if its
available?
It is
Hi,
Am 24.04.24 um 21:35 schrieb Peter B:
Why is it bad? The nogui's are lighter dependencies than the gui
packages.
Exactly. That#s why they should be used in package building for
converting stuff.
One or the other is needed. Surely better to use the nogui if its
available?
It is
Hi Lucas,
this is no bug in the package AFAICS.
libreoffice-draw-nogui is clearly only in Build-Depends-Indep:
Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13),
fpc,
libgtk2.0-dev,
lcl,
lcl-qt5,
Build-Depends-Indep:
libreoffice-draw-nogui,
libreoffice-writer,
So it's only needed for _all builds.
Hi Lucas,
this is no bug in the package AFAICS.
libreoffice-draw-nogui is clearly only in Build-Depends-Indep:
Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13),
fpc,
libgtk2.0-dev,
lcl,
lcl-qt5,
Build-Depends-Indep:
libreoffice-draw-nogui,
libreoffice-writer,
So it's only needed for _all builds.
Package: ftp.debian.org
Hi,
The following packages are cruft:
$ rmadison -s experimental -S libreoffice | grep -v 24\.2\.3
fonts-opensymbol | 4:102.12+LibO7.5.4~rc2-1 |
experimental | all
fonts-opensymbol | 4:102.12+LibO7.5.5~rc1-2 |
experimental |
Package: ftp.debian.org
Hi,
please remove
rene@frodo:~$ rmadison -s unstable libuno-sal3 libuno-cppu3
libuno-salhelpergcc3-3 libuno-cppuhelpergcc3-3 libuno-purpenvhelpergcc3-3
libuno-cppu3 | 4:24.2.0-1 | unstable | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386,
ppc64el, s390x
libuno-cppuhelpergcc3-3 |
Package: ftp.debian.org
Hi,
The following packages have been ANAIS for loong (sincd 7.6.x times.).
$ rmadison -s unstable ure-java libofficebean-java
libreoffice-sdbc-hsqldb libreoffice-report-builder
libreoffice-report-builder-bin | grep -v 24
libofficebean-java | 4:7.5.9~rc1-1 |
60a187494196de909abf65edd0e074cd58dd8062
Author: Rene Engelhard
AuthorDate: Wed Apr 3 23:26:08 2024 +0200
Commit: Thorsten Behrens
CommitDate: Thu Apr 11 07:32:45 2024 +0200
clean up after removal of patched rhino
Change-Id: I193fd0c10d297555faa7a832718dbd6cd929a406
Reviewed-on: https
479a39cbf0f4564abe93066d7a3f6b2e82de0e76
Author: Rene Engelhard
AuthorDate: Wed Apr 3 23:26:08 2024 +0200
Commit: Stephan Bergmann
CommitDate: Mon Apr 8 10:48:19 2024 +0200
clean up after removal of patched rhino
Change-Id: I193fd0c10d297555faa7a832718dbd6cd929a406
Reviewed-on: https
{mysql,firebird}.ucf: add
* debian/control.in: add Breaks: -sdbc-{mysql,firebird} (<< 4:24.2.2-2)
to libreoffice-common
-- Rene Engelhard Sat, 30 Mar 2024 09:30:30 +
even though -2 was never attempted on armhf due to that build-dep (-3
was built then)
{mysql,firebird}.ucf: add
* debian/control.in: add Breaks: -sdbc-{mysql,firebird} (<< 4:24.2.2-2)
to libreoffice-common
-- Rene Engelhard Sat, 30 Mar 2024 09:30:30 +
even though -2 was never attempted on armhf due to that build-dep (-3
was built then)
{mysql,firebird}.ucf: add
* debian/control.in: add Breaks: -sdbc-{mysql,firebird} (<< 4:24.2.2-2)
to libreoffice-common
-- Rene Engelhard Sat, 30 Mar 2024 09:30:30 +
even though -2 was never attempted on armhf due to that build-dep (-3
was built then)
Hi,
for the sake of this bug (since it misses the mail history) this is the
FTBFS:
Test name: testContentGnumeric::TestBody
assertion failed
- Expression:
xServiceInfo->supportsService("com.sun.star.sheet.SpreadsheetDocument")
Failures !!!
Run: 64 Failure total: 1 Failures: 1 Errors:
Hi,
for the sake of this bug (since it misses the mail history) this is the
FTBFS:
Test name: testContentGnumeric::TestBody
assertion failed
- Expression:
xServiceInfo->supportsService("com.sun.star.sheet.SpreadsheetDocument")
Failures !!!
Run: 64 Failure total: 1 Failures: 1 Errors:
Version: 4:24.2.2-3
Hi,
Am 07.04.24 um 23:13 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Filing a bug for reference. This is fixed in 4:24.2.2-3, will mark it
as such when I get the bug number.
As said.
Regards,
Rene
Source: libreoffice
Version: 4:24.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: trixie ftbfs
Hi,
Am 30.03.24 um 12:56 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 30.03.24 um 08:49 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
That would mean a bin-NMU of liborcus would work and then a rebuild
of libreoffice (gb, but I need a new upload anyway
Source: libreoffice
Version: 4:24.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: trixie ftbfs
Hi,
Am 30.03.24 um 12:56 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 30.03.24 um 08:49 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
That would mean a bin-NMU of liborcus would work and then a rebuild
of libreoffice (gb, but I need a new upload anyway
Source: libreoffice
Version: 4:24.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: trixie ftbfs
Hi,
Am 30.03.24 um 12:56 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 30.03.24 um 08:49 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
That would mean a bin-NMU of liborcus would work and then a rebuild
of libreoffice (gb, but I need a new upload anyway
Hi,
Am 07.04.24 um 20:59 schrieb José Luis González:
Closing this non-bug.
Maybe that indeed was too harsh, I apologize.
But you could have explained what you mean in a polite way instead of
starting directly with ad-hominem attacks on a public list?
The non-bug that should be closed is
Hi,
Am 07.04.24 um 20:59 schrieb José Luis González:
Am 06.04.24 um 00:34 schrieb José Luis González:
The setting for spacing between paragraphs is missing in the spacing
and indentation tab of the paragraph dialog.
?
It's definitely there. Format -> Paragraph has spacing "after/before".
Hi,
Am 07.04.24 um 20:59 schrieb José Luis González:
Am 06.04.24 um 00:34 schrieb José Luis González:
The setting for spacing between paragraphs is missing in the spacing
and indentation tab of the paragraph dialog.
?
It's definitely there. Format -> Paragraph has spacing "after/before".
Hi,
Am 07.04.24 um 20:59 schrieb José Luis González:
Am 06.04.24 um 00:34 schrieb José Luis González:
The setting for spacing between paragraphs is missing in the spacing
and indentation tab of the paragraph dialog.
?
It's definitely there. Format -> Paragraph has spacing "after/before".
tag 1068595 + moreinfo
thanks
Am 07.04.24 um 20:02 schrieb José Luis González:
Space insertion is missing in the insert menu.
Huh? What?
Normal space is "Space".
Non breaking space is Insert -> Formatting Mark -> Non breaking space if
you want to use the menu. One can argue that it's
tag 1068595 + moreinfo
thanks
Am 07.04.24 um 20:02 schrieb José Luis González:
Space insertion is missing in the insert menu.
Huh? What?
Normal space is "Space".
Non breaking space is Insert -> Formatting Mark -> Non breaking space if
you want to use the menu. One can argue that it's
Hi,
Debian experimental just got ICU 75 and I tried it to look what breaks
now :)
Indeed it breaks again for breakiterator rules:
[build BRK] CustomTarget/i18npool/breakiterator/sent.brk
S=/home/rene/LibreOffice/git/master && I=$S/instdir && W=$S/workdir &&
/usr/bin/genbrk -r
Hi,
Am 06.04.24 um 11:43 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 06.04.24 um 11:31 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 06.04.24 um 11:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
See https://people.debian.org/~rene/libreoffice/1068479-works.png
Just for avoidance of doubt since the screenshot is in German:
[...]
And the first
Hi,
Am 06.04.24 um 11:43 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 06.04.24 um 11:31 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 06.04.24 um 11:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
See https://people.debian.org/~rene/libreoffice/1068479-works.png
Just for avoidance of doubt since the screenshot is in German:
[...]
And the first
Hi again,
Am 06.04.24 um 11:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 06.04.24 um 11:03 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 06.04.24 um 00:34 schrieb José Luis González:
The setting for spacing between paragraphs is missing in the spacing
and indentation tab of the paragraph dialog.
?
It's definitely
Hi again,
Am 06.04.24 um 11:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 06.04.24 um 11:03 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 06.04.24 um 00:34 schrieb José Luis González:
The setting for spacing between paragraphs is missing in the spacing
and indentation tab of the paragraph dialog.
?
It's definitely
Hi,
Am 06.04.24 um 11:31 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 06.04.24 um 11:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
See https://people.debian.org/~rene/libreoffice/1068479-works.png
Just for avoidance of doubt since the screenshot is in German:
That is the second part "Absatz".
First is "above&quo
Hi,
Am 06.04.24 um 11:31 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 06.04.24 um 11:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
See https://people.debian.org/~rene/libreoffice/1068479-works.png
Just for avoidance of doubt since the screenshot is in German:
That is the second part "Absatz".
First is "above&quo
Hi,
Am 06.04.24 um 11:03 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 06.04.24 um 00:34 schrieb José Luis González:
The setting for spacing between paragraphs is missing in the spacing
and indentation tab of the paragraph dialog.
?
It's definitely there. Format -> Paragraph has spacing "after/befor
Hi again,
Am 06.04.24 um 11:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 06.04.24 um 11:03 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 06.04.24 um 00:34 schrieb José Luis González:
The setting for spacing between paragraphs is missing in the spacing
and indentation tab of the paragraph dialog.
?
It's definitely
Hi again,
Am 06.04.24 um 11:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 06.04.24 um 11:03 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 06.04.24 um 00:34 schrieb José Luis González:
The setting for spacing between paragraphs is missing in the spacing
and indentation tab of the paragraph dialog.
?
It's definitely
Hi,
Am 06.04.24 um 11:03 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 06.04.24 um 00:34 schrieb José Luis González:
The setting for spacing between paragraphs is missing in the spacing
and indentation tab of the paragraph dialog.
?
It's definitely there. Format -> Paragraph has spacing "after/befor
tag 1068479 + moreinfo
tag 1068479 + unreproducible
severity 1068479 important
thanks
Hi,
Am 06.04.24 um 00:34 schrieb José Luis González:
The setting for spacing between paragraphs is missing in the spacing
and indentation tab of the paragraph dialog.
?
It's definitely there. Format
tag 1068479 + moreinfo
tag 1068479 + unreproducible
severity 1068479 important
thanks
Hi,
Am 06.04.24 um 00:34 schrieb José Luis González:
The setting for spacing between paragraphs is missing in the spacing
and indentation tab of the paragraph dialog.
?
It's definitely there. Format
tag 1068479 + moreinfo
tag 1068479 + unreproducible
severity 1068479 important
thanks
Hi,
Am 06.04.24 um 00:34 schrieb José Luis González:
The setting for spacing between paragraphs is missing in the spacing
and indentation tab of the paragraph dialog.
?
It's definitely there. Format
severity 1036805 important
thanks
Hi,
> Serious severity because it has a major effect on the usability of the
> package without rendering it completely unusable, not minor
No, it's not.
"serious" has it's own meaning though and that's not it.
At most it's important but I don't buy this
severity 1036805 important
thanks
Hi,
> Serious severity because it has a major effect on the usability of the
> package without rendering it completely unusable, not minor
No, it's not.
"serious" has it's own meaning though and that's not it.
At most it's important but I don't buy this
severity 1036805 important
thanks
Hi,
> Serious severity because it has a major effect on the usability of the
> package without rendering it completely unusable, not minor
No, it's not.
"serious" has it's own meaning though and that's not it.
At most it's important but I don't buy this
Hi again,
sorry, missed a part of a sentence.
Am 04.04.24 um 18:13 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
This is it. gcc and/or ld got killed from the outside.
...by the OOM killer I guess.
Regards,
Rene
Hi,
well..
Am 03.04.24 um 19:45 schrieb Andreas Mantke:
On 2024-03-24 00:17, Andreas Mantke wrote:
I try to compile LibreOffice core on Debian 12 -x64 but the process
ended with an error.
Here the messages in the shell at the end of the build process:
[MOD] unoxml
Hi,
Am 30.03.24 um 08:49 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
That would mean a bin-NMU of liborcus would work and then a rebuild of
libreoffice (gb, but I need a new upload anyway)
So we probably missed a rename? (Or more for stuff silently using
time-date?)
boost1.83 (iostream)? liborcus? Both?
I
Hi,
I got
qahelper.cxx:580:Assertion
Test name: testContentGnumeric::TestBody
assertion failed
- Expression:
xServiceInfo->supportsService("com.sun.star.sheet.SpreadsheetDocument")
Failures !!!
Run: 64 Failure total: 1 Failures: 1 Errors: 0
make[3]: ***
Hi,
Also see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977857
Regards,
Rene
Hi,
Also see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977857
Regards,
Rene
reassign 1068023 libreoffice-gtk4
thanks
Hi,
Am 29.03.24 um 21:04 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Package: libreoffice
if it happens only with gtk4, isn't it better suited at libreoffice-gtk4?
I use other gtk applications (e.g. evince, audacity, inkscape, firefox)
in this same environment
reassign 1068023 libreoffice-gtk4
thanks
Hi,
Am 29.03.24 um 21:04 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Package: libreoffice
if it happens only with gtk4, isn't it better suited at libreoffice-gtk4?
I use other gtk applications (e.g. evince, audacity, inkscape, firefox)
in this same environment
Package: libreoffice
Version: 4:24.2.0-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: Daniel Kahn Gillmor
I have qtwayland5 5.15.10-2+b1 installed. I do not have XWayland
installed at all. I'm running from within a Wayland session, using sway
1.9-1 as a compositor.
When i try to launch libreoffice using
Package: libreoffice
Version: 4:24.2.0-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: Daniel Kahn Gillmor
I have qtwayland5 5.15.10-2+b1 installed. I do not have XWayland
installed at all. I'm running from within a Wayland session, using sway
1.9-1 as a compositor.
When i try to launch libreoffice using
Hi,
Am 25.03.24 um 19:17 schrieb Julian Gilbey:
* Reading and writing file formats (like CSV, Apache ORC, and Apache
Parquet)
liborcus supports this (Apache Parquet) if built with Apache Arrow. And
thus makes LibreOffice being able to handle it.
I didn't invest any time in Apache
Hi,
Am 25.03.24 um 19:17 schrieb Julian Gilbey:
* Reading and writing file formats (like CSV, Apache ORC, and Apache
Parquet)
liborcus supports this (Apache Parquet) if built with Apache Arrow. And
thus makes LibreOffice being able to handle it.
I didn't invest any time in Apache
Hi,
Am 25.03.24 um 19:17 schrieb Julian Gilbey:
* Reading and writing file formats (like CSV, Apache ORC, and Apache
Parquet)
liborcus supports this (Apache Parquet) if built with Apache Arrow. And
thus makes LibreOffice being able to handle it.
I didn't invest any time in Apache
Hi,
Am 25.03.24 um 19:17 schrieb Julian Gilbey:
* Reading and writing file formats (like CSV, Apache ORC, and Apache
Parquet)
liborcus supports this (Apache Parquet) if built with Apache Arrow. And
thus makes LibreOffice being able to handle it.
I didn't invest any time in Apache
Hi,
Am 25.03.24 um 19:17 schrieb Julian Gilbey:
* Reading and writing file formats (like CSV, Apache ORC, and Apache
Parquet)
liborcus supports this (Apache Parquet) if built with Apache Arrow. And
thus makes LibreOffice being able to handle it.
I didn't invest any time in Apache
vcl/unx/generic/window/salframe.cxx |6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 10831c8b7b39f058452e640ba804f5a928441ed9
Author: Rene Engelhard
AuthorDate: Sun Mar 17 17:42:43 2024 +0100
Commit: Michael Weghorn
CommitDate: Thu Mar 21 09:04:08 2024
Hi,
Am 16.03.24 um 17:23 schrieb Sophia Schröder:
then I probably misunderstood the ESC minutes from 2024/02/29:
Yes.
+ cmake find modules for SDK examples (Hossein)
+ Set of patches from Konstantin (WIP)
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/162978
+ Similar structure is
block 1058545 by 1058653
tag 1058545 + patch
thanks
Hi,
This is due to
> dh_installdocs: error: Cannot find (any matches for) "doc/Esnacc.pdf"
(tried in .)
which is due to
(cd /home/rene/esnacc-1.8.1/doc && unzip eSNACCManuals.zip &&
libreoffice --headless --convert-to pdf Esnacc.doc)
block 1058545 by 1058653
tag 1058545 + patch
thanks
Hi,
This is due to
> dh_installdocs: error: Cannot find (any matches for) "doc/Esnacc.pdf"
(tried in .)
which is due to
(cd /home/rene/esnacc-1.8.1/doc && unzip eSNACCManuals.zip &&
libreoffice --headless --convert-to pdf Esnacc.doc)
block 1058545 by 1058653
tag 1058545 + patch
thanks
Hi,
This is due to
dh_installdocs: error: Cannot find (any matches for) "doc/Esnacc.pdf"
(tried in .)
which is due to
(cd /home/rene/esnacc-1.8.1/doc && unzip eSNACCManuals.zip &&
libreoffice --headless --convert-to pdf Esnacc.doc)
block 1058545 by 1058653
tag 1058545 + patch
thanks
Hi,
This is due to
> dh_installdocs: error: Cannot find (any matches for) "doc/Esnacc.pdf"
(tried in .)
which is due to
(cd /home/rene/esnacc-1.8.1/doc && unzip eSNACCManuals.zip &&
libreoffice --headless --convert-to pdf Esnacc.doc)
Source: esnacc
Version: 1.8.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
esnacc FTBFS:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I./asn1specs
-I./asn1specs -I./c-lib/inc -g -O2
Source: esnacc
Version: 1.8.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
esnacc FTBFS:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I./asn1specs
-I./asn1specs -I./c-lib/inc -g -O2
Source: esnacc
Version: 1.8.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
esnacc FTBFS:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I./asn1specs
-I./asn1specs -I./c-lib/inc -g -O2
tag 1066473: + pending
thanks
Hi,
Am 13.03.24 um 12:53 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Interesting. I almost wanted to tag it unreproducible since it didn't
happen in my already-existing chroot... But it definitely
tag 1066473: + pending
thanks
Hi,
Am 13.03.24 um 12:53 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Interesting. I almost wanted to tag it unreproducible since it didn't
happen in my already-existing chroot... But it definitely
Hi,
Am 12.03.24 um 15:17 schrieb Raphaël Halimi:
Are we supposed to report bugs against packages ending up with "t64"
and missing the "Provides: " for affected
architectures like armhf ?
That Provides: is there for archs where the transition *doesn't* make a
difference.
In Debian:
Hi again,
Am 10.03.24 um 19:59 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
BTW, What is the replacement for it? setuptools._distutils? As in the
following patch?
OK, so discussion on IRC gave:
19:51 < tumbleweed> _rene_: distutils is removed in 3.12
19:51 < tumbleweed> if you need distutils, tr
Hi again,
Am 10.03.24 um 19:59 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
BTW, What is the replacement for it? setuptools._distutils? As in the
following patch?
OK, so discussion on IRC gave:
19:51 < tumbleweed> _rene_: distutils is removed in 3.12
19:51 < tumbleweed> if you need distutils, tr
Hi,
Am 10.03.24 um 19:44 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
and similar stuff in upstreams configure.
python_include=`$PYTHON -c "import distutils.sysconfig;
print(distutils.sysconfig.get_config_var('INCLUDEPY'));"`
python_version=`$PYTHON -c "import distutils.sy
Hi,
Am 10.03.24 um 19:44 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
and similar stuff in upstreams configure.
python_include=`$PYTHON -c "import distutils.sysconfig;
print(distutils.sysconfig.get_config_var('INCLUDEPY'));"`
python_version=`$PYTHON -c "import distutils.sy
tag 1065893 - ftbfs
tag 1065893 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Am 10.03.24 um 18:49 schrieb Graham Inggs:
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Nope. As demonstrated below it does NOT FTBFS if I ran it to the end.
Actually did once.
This package has dependencies, build-dependencies and/or autopkgtest
tag 1065893 - ftbfs
tag 1065893 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Am 10.03.24 um 18:49 schrieb Graham Inggs:
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Nope. As demonstrated below it does NOT FTBFS if I ran it to the end.
Actually did once.
This package has dependencies, build-dependencies and/or autopkgtest
Hi,
Am 08.03.24 um 08:23 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Can you have a look, please? I had a brief one, but that is a simple
define which shoudln't break. Then the switch does
switch (aFileStatFs.f_type) {
which uses
struct statfs aFileStatFs;
So it probably is a type difference
Hi,
see
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice=i386=4%3A24.2.2~rc1-1=1709881487=1:
/<>/sal/osl/unx/file.cxx: In function ‘void
osl_file_adjustLockFlags(const rtl::OString&, int*, sal_uInt32*)’:
/<>/sal/osl/unx/file.cxx:71:26: error: narrowing conversion
of ‘4283649346’
Hi,
Am 08.03.24 um 00:12 schrieb Eric Valette:
On 07/03/2024 21:16, Rene Engelhard wrote:
ct more people.
But not so much for dependency issues like this. Which is my sole
point. In 99,9% of cases this won't even migrate to testing. And
unstable won't be released - testing will.
What
Am 08.03.24 um 00:12 schrieb Eric Valette:
On 07/03/2024 21:16, Rene Engelhard wrote:
ct more people.
But not so much for dependency issues like this. Which is my sole
point. In 99,9% of cases this won't even migrate to testing. And
unstable won't be released - testing will.
What is your
Hi,
Am 07.03.24 um 21:07 schrieb Eric Valette:
On 07/03/2024 20:55, Rene Engelhard wrote:
unstable is unstable. Don't use it if you can't handle stuff like
this. And yes, be it even for more days or however it takes.
The usual mantra. However, if no one use unstable and debug it to make
Hi,
Am 07.03.24 um 20:33 schrieb Eric Valette:
On 07/03/2024 19:58, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> My point also was that your reopening of the bug is wrong since the
maintainer can't do anything about it.
E.g. if libreoffice wasn't rebuilt against most t64 r-deps since it a)
also has librar
Am 07.03.24 um 19:21 schrieb Eric Valette:
On 07/03/2024 18:57, Rene Engelhard wrote:
That one is tracked and will get appropriate bin-NMUs from the
release team, I am sure.
It is right that this uninstallability is "being part of the normal
things due to transition".
Am 07.03.24 um 09:55 schrieb Eric Valette:
On 07/03/2024 07:25, Kevin Bowling wrote:
As of this evening these are the packages that currently have broken
deps on amd64 for me:
gstreamer1.0-plugins-good gstreamer1.0-pulseaudio
libkf5akonadisearch-bin libkf5akonadisearch-plugins occt-misc
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1065461 in libreoffice reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Hi,
Am 05.03.24 um 00:47 schrieb Andreas Beckmann:
Preparing to unpack .../libreoffice-common_4%3a24.2.1-3_all.deb ...
Unpacking libreoffice-common (4:24.2.1-3) over (4:24.2.0-1) ...
dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt/archives/libreoffice-common_4%3a24.2.1-3_all.deb
Hi,
Am 05.03.24 um 00:47 schrieb Andreas Beckmann:
Preparing to unpack .../libreoffice-common_4%3a24.2.1-3_all.deb ...
Unpacking libreoffice-common (4:24.2.1-3) over (4:24.2.0-1) ...
dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt/archives/libreoffice-common_4%3a24.2.1-3_all.deb
Hi,
Am 05.03.24 um 00:47 schrieb Andreas Beckmann:
Preparing to unpack .../libreoffice-common_4%3a24.2.1-3_all.deb ...
Unpacking libreoffice-common (4:24.2.1-3) over (4:24.2.0-1) ...
dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt/archives/libreoffice-common_4%3a24.2.1-3_all.deb
:28.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+winff (1.6.3+dfsg-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ * only build-depend on needed libreoffice-draw, libreoffice-writer;
+remove extraneous libreoffice, ure-java, default-jre
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard Mon, 04 Mar 2024 20:50:28 +
+
winff (1.6.3+dfsg-1
1 - 100 of 26061 matches
Mail list logo
