[Bug 2064187] Re: llvm-18-linker-tools does not include LLVMgold.so

2024-05-09 Thread Shengjing Zhu
** Also affects: llvm-toolchain-18 (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: llvm-toolchain-18 (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: llvm-toolchain-18 (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in:

[Bug 2063085] [NEW] Sync ccls 0.20240202-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-04-22 Thread Shengjing Zhu
llvm-18. Changelog entries since current noble version 0.20230717-1ubuntu2: ccls (0.20240202-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release 0.20240202 + Supports LLVM-18 -- Shengjing Zhu Sun, 21 Apr 2024 00:03:33 +0800 ** Affects: ccls (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist

Bug#1069368: Updating golang-github-golang-protobuf-1-5 to fix FTBFS

2024-04-20 Thread Shengjing Zhu
un testing for any build regressions with the newer version yet. > This is a known regression in 1.5.3, see https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/1596#issuecomment-1981208282 -- Shengjing Zhu

Bug#1068136: Updating golang-github-golang-protobuf-1-5 to fix FTBFS

2024-04-20 Thread Shengjing Zhu
un testing for any build regressions with the newer version yet. > This is a known regression in 1.5.3, see https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/1596#issuecomment-1981208282 -- Shengjing Zhu

Re: Updating golang-github-golang-protobuf-1-5 to fix FTBFS

2024-04-20 Thread Shengjing Zhu
un testing for any build regressions with the newer version yet. > This is a known regression in 1.5.3, see https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/1596#issuecomment-1981208282 -- Shengjing Zhu

Bug#1069310: FTBFS: tests failed

2024-04-19 Thread Shengjing Zhu
org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061659 and https://github.com/hanwen/go-fuse/issues/502 which is only fixed on i386. -- Shengjing Zhu

Bug#1069310: FTBFS: tests failed

2024-04-19 Thread Shengjing Zhu
org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061659 and https://github.com/hanwen/go-fuse/issues/502 which is only fixed on i386. -- Shengjing Zhu

[pkg-go] Bug#1069310: FTBFS: tests failed

2024-04-19 Thread Shengjing Zhu
org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061659 and https://github.com/hanwen/go-fuse/issues/502 which is only fixed on i386. -- Shengjing Zhu ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[Bug 2061932] Re: fakeroot: FTBFS on armhf and armel: symbol `__lstat64_time64' is already defined

2024-04-18 Thread Shengjing Zhu
** Changed in: fakeroot (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Shengjing Zhu (zhsj) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061932 Title: fakeroot: FTBFS on armhf and armel: sym

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2062157] Re: kmod: FTBFS on arm{el, hf}: /usr/include/features-time64.h:26:5: error: #error "_TIME_BITS=64 is allowed only with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64"

2024-04-18 Thread Shengjing Zhu
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~zhsj/ubuntu/+source/kmod/+git/kmod/+merge/464608 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to kmod in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062157 Title: kmod:

[Bug 2062157] Re: kmod: FTBFS on arm{el, hf}: /usr/include/features-time64.h:26:5: error: #error "_TIME_BITS=64 is allowed only with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64"

2024-04-18 Thread Shengjing Zhu
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~zhsj/ubuntu/+source/kmod/+git/kmod/+merge/464608 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062157 Title: kmod: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2062157] [NEW] kmod: FTBFS on arm{el, hf}: /usr/include/features-time64.h:26:5: error: #error "_TIME_BITS=64 is allowed only with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64"

2024-04-18 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Public bug reported: Imported from Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/1065973: Source: kmod Version: 32-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org

[Bug 2062157] [NEW] kmod: FTBFS on arm{el, hf}: /usr/include/features-time64.h:26:5: error: #error "_TIME_BITS=64 is allowed only with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64"

2024-04-18 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Public bug reported: Imported from Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/1065973: Source: kmod Version: 32-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org

[Bug 2061664] Re: Appdata metainfo XML not in main pkg, breaking Appstream software install

2024-04-18 Thread Shengjing Zhu
** CVE removed: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2024-3094 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061664 Title: Appdata metainfo XML not in main pkg, breaking Appstream

[Bug 2061745] Re: Please demote golang-1.21 to universe

2024-04-16 Thread Shengjing Zhu
sadly component-mismatches now complains o golang-1.21: golang-1.21-doc [Reverse-Depends: Rescued from golang-1.21] After recheck the germinate-output, I finally understand what I have missed. I missed containerd-app and runc-app packages. When I talked to @lucaskanashiro last time, I thought

[Bug 2061932] [NEW] fakeroot: FTBFS on armhf and armel: symbol `__lstat64_time64' is already defined

2024-04-16 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Public bug reported: Imported from Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/1065552: Source: fakeroot Version: 1.34-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Hi, fakeroot fails to build on armhf and armel when compiled with the time64 flags:

[Bug 2061920] [NEW] Sync golang-1.22 1.22.2-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-04-16 Thread Shengjing Zhu
://github.com/golang/go/issues/64650 -- Shengjing Zhu Tue, 16 Apr 2024 16:13:31 +0800 ** Affects: golang-1.22 (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: New ** Changed in: golang-1.22 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a mem

[Bug 2061921] [NEW] Sync molly-brown 0.0~git20230820.2068c3b-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-04-16 Thread Shengjing Zhu
in autopktest to match certificates (LP: #2059312) -- Shengjing Zhu Tue, 16 Apr 2024 19:12:11 +0800 ** Affects: molly-brown (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: New ** Changed in: molly-brown (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notificat

[Bug 2061745] Re: Please demote golang-1.21 to universe

2024-04-16 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Currently reverse deps for golang-1.21 $ reverse-depends -r noble -b src:golang-1.21 Reverse-Testsuite-Triggers == * runc-app (for golang-1.21-go) Reverse-Build-Depends = * containerd-app(for golang-1.21-go) *

[Bug 2061745] [NEW] Please demote golang-1.21 to universe

2024-04-16 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Public bug reported: golang-defaults has pointed to 1.22, but looks like golang-1.21/source and golang-1.21-doc/binary are still in main. $ rmadison -u ubuntu -S golang-1.21 |grep noble golang-1.21 | 1.21.9-1| noble | source golang-1.21 | 1.21.9-1

[Bug 2061742] Re: frequent TestCrashDumpsAllThreads failures on linux/s390x

2024-04-16 Thread Shengjing Zhu
upstream issue https://github.com/golang/go/issues/64650 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061742 Title: frequent TestCrashDumpsAllThreads failures on linux/s390x To manage

[Bug 2061742] [NEW] frequent TestCrashDumpsAllThreads failures on linux/s390x

2024-04-16 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Public bug reported: --- FAIL: TestCrashDumpsAllThreads (0.29s) crash_unix_test.go:149: found 1 instances of main.crashDumpsAllThreadsLoop; expected 4 crash_unix_test.go:150: SIGQUIT: quit PC=0x1013c6 m=0 sigcode=0 goroutine 21 gp=0xc82a80 m=0 mp=0x20d0c0

[Bug 2060892] Re: Sync golang-github-hashicorp-golang-lru-v2 2.0.7-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-04-10 Thread Shengjing Zhu
this flaky test prevents golang-github-hashicorp-golang-lru-v2/2.0.7-1 to migrate autopkgtest for golang-github-hashicorp-golang-lru-v2/2.0.7-1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: Pass, i386: Not a regression, ppc64el: Regression ♻ , s390x: Pass ** Tags added: update-excuse -- You received this

[Bug 2060892] [NEW] Sync golang-github-hashicorp-golang-lru-v2 2.0.7-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-04-10 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Public bug reported: Please sync golang-github-hashicorp-golang-lru-v2 2.0.7-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current noble version 2.0.7-1: golang-github-hashicorp-golang-lru-v2 (2.0.7-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Disable flaky ExampleLRU test -- Shengjing

[Bug 2060890] [NEW] autopkgtest fails with golang-github-coreos-go-systemd 22.5.0-1

2024-04-10 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Public bug reported: https://objectstorage.prodstack5.canonical.com/swift/v1/AUTH_0f9aae918d5b4744bf7b827671c86842/autopkgtest- noble/noble/amd64/r/runc/20240407_064433_8e120@/log.gz 1367s github.com/seccomp/libseccomp-golang: exec: "pkg-config": executable file not found in $PATH

Bug#1063077: syslog-ng: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs

2024-04-09 Thread Shengjing Zhu
>=, << dependencies which did not account for > +the possibility of ABI skew in a binNMU, which is exactly what happens > +with the 64-bit time_t transition. > > And my question is again, is the rules really changed or we bend the > rules just because of one transition? -- Shengjing Zhu

Bug#1063077: syslog-ng: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs

2024-04-09 Thread Shengjing Zhu
>=, << dependencies which did not account for > +the possibility of ABI skew in a binNMU, which is exactly what happens > +with the 64-bit time_t transition. > > And my question is again, is the rules really changed or we bend the > rules just because of one transition? -- Shengjing Zhu

Re: syslog-ng: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs

2024-04-09 Thread Shengjing Zhu
>=, << dependencies which did not account for > +the possibility of ABI skew in a binNMU, which is exactly what happens > +with the 64-bit time_t transition. > > And my question is again, is the rules really changed or we bend the > rules just because of one transition? -- Shengjing Zhu

[Bug 2060195] [NEW] Sync golang-1.22 1.22.2-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-04-04 Thread Shengjing Zhu
when receiving too many headers * Revert "Backport patch to fix external link on riscv64" (applied in 1.22.2) -- Shengjing Zhu Thu, 04 Apr 2024 04:23:15 +0800 ** Affects: golang-1.22 (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: New ** Changed in: golang-1.22 (Ubuntu)

[Bug 2060192] [NEW] Sync golang-1.21 1.21.9-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-04-04 Thread Shengjing Zhu
when receiving too many headers -- Shengjing Zhu Thu, 04 Apr 2024 04:16:59 +0800 ** Affects: golang-1.21 (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: New ** Changed in: golang-1.21 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 2060018] Re: Sync golang-github-weppos-publicsuffix-go 0.30.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-04-02 Thread Shengjing Zhu
This is a leaf package, no reverse-deps. The new version should help golang-github-google-go-github/60.0.0-1 to migrate. ** Summary changed: - Sync golang-github-weppos-publicsuffix-go 0.30.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) + [FFe] Sync golang-github-weppos-publicsuffix-go 0.30.1-1

[Bug 2060018] [NEW] [FFe] Sync golang-github-weppos-publicsuffix-go 0.30.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-04-02 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Public bug reported: Please sync golang-github-weppos-publicsuffix-go 0.30.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current noble version 0.15.0-5: golang-github-weppos-publicsuffix-go (0.30.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Team upload. * New upstream version

[Bug 2059896] [NEW] Sync golang-github-gopacket-gopacket 1.2.0-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-04-01 Thread Shengjing Zhu
-- Shengjing Zhu Fri, 29 Mar 2024 06:25:50 +0800 ** Affects: golang-github-gopacket-gopacket (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: New ** Changed in: golang-github-gopacket-gopacket (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because

Bug#1068056: ccls: FTBFS on armhf,i386 (test_response failures)

2024-03-30 Thread Shengjing Zhu
fails to build on armhf, i386. > As explained in 1068055. -- Shengjing Zhu

Bug#1068056: ccls: FTBFS on armhf,i386 (test_response failures)

2024-03-30 Thread Shengjing Zhu
fails to build on armhf, i386. > As explained in 1068055. -- Shengjing Zhu

Bug#1068055: ccls: FTBFS on armel (undefined reference to symbol '__atomic_load_8@@LIBATOMIC_1.0')

2024-03-30 Thread Shengjing Zhu
linking against with -latomic) It's fine, as it never successfully built before. Even if it builds, the test will fail. See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934408 -- Shengjing Zhu

Bug#1068055: ccls: FTBFS on armel (undefined reference to symbol '__atomic_load_8@@LIBATOMIC_1.0')

2024-03-30 Thread Shengjing Zhu
linking against with -latomic) It's fine, as it never successfully built before. Even if it builds, the test will fail. See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934408 -- Shengjing Zhu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2059417] Re: Sync xz-utils 5.6.1-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-03-28 Thread Shengjing Zhu
It's reverted in Debian https://tracker.debian.org/news/1515519/accepted-xz- utils-561really545-1-source-into-unstable/ Though from the changelog I didn't see the reason. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Bug 2059417] Re: Sync xz-utils 5.6.1-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-03-28 Thread Shengjing Zhu
It's reverted in Debian https://tracker.debian.org/news/1515519/accepted-xz- utils-561really545-1-source-into-unstable/ Though from the changelog I didn't see the reason. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2059732] [NEW] Sync gopacket 1.1.19-6 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-03-28 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Public bug reported: Please sync gopacket 1.1.19-6 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current noble version 1.1.19-4build1: gopacket (1.1.19-6) unstable; urgency=medium * Fix missing endif -- Shengjing Zhu Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:51:11 +0800 gopacket (1.1.19-5

Bug#1067390: ITP: watcher -- watch for files or directory changes without using filesystem events

2024-03-20 Thread Shengjing Zhu
r the package name. But the cli /usr/bin/watcher is already taken by python3-watcherclient. -- Shengjing Zhu

Bug#1067390: ITP: watcher -- watch for files or directory changes without using filesystem events

2024-03-20 Thread Shengjing Zhu
r the package name. But the cli /usr/bin/watcher is already taken by python3-watcherclient. -- Shengjing Zhu

[Bug 2058222] [NEW] FTBFS: _FORTIFY_SOURCE redefined

2024-03-18 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Public bug reported: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kronosnet/1.28-2 https://launchpadlibrarian.net/718935265/buildlog_ubuntu-noble- amd64.kronosnet_1.28-2_BUILDING.txt.gz Making all in . make[4]: Entering directory '/<>/libnozzle' /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc

[Bug 2058222] Re: FTBFS: _FORTIFY_SOURCE redefined

2024-03-18 Thread Shengjing Zhu
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~zhsj/ubuntu/+source/kronosnet/+git/kronosnet/+merge/462394 ** Tags added: ftbfs update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Bug#1066778: golang-github-containerd-go-runc: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 8 github.com/containerd/go-runc returned exit code 1

2024-03-14 Thread Shengjing Zhu
gt; console_test.go:42: mkdir /tmp/foo: not a directory > > --- FAIL: TestTempConsoleWithXdgRuntimeDir (0.00s) I wonder if your chroot doesn't have the /tmp directory? -- Shengjing Zhu

Bug#1066778: golang-github-containerd-go-runc: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 8 github.com/containerd/go-runc returned exit code 1

2024-03-14 Thread Shengjing Zhu
gt; console_test.go:42: mkdir /tmp/foo: not a directory > > --- FAIL: TestTempConsoleWithXdgRuntimeDir (0.00s) I wonder if your chroot doesn't have the /tmp directory? -- Shengjing Zhu

[Bug 2056309] [NEW] Sync golang-1.21 1.21.8-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-03-06 Thread Shengjing Zhu
: errors returned from MarshalJSON methods may break template escaping + CVE-2024-24784: net/mail: comments in display names are incorrectly handled * Update upstream signing key -- Shengjing Zhu Wed, 06 Mar 2024 15:14:10 +0800 ** Affects: golang-1.21 (Ubuntu) Importance

[Bug 2056310] [NEW] Sync golang-1.22 1.22.1-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-03-06 Thread Shengjing Zhu
: errors returned from MarshalJSON methods may break template escaping + CVE-2024-24784: net/mail: comments in display names are incorrectly handled * Update upstream signing key * Backport patch to fix external link on riscv64 (Closes: #1065368) -- Shengjing Zhu Wed, 06 Mar

[Bug 2056154] Re: Please build with golang-1.21 or golang-1.22

2024-03-06 Thread Shengjing Zhu
** Also affects: docker.io-app (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056154 Title: Please build with golang-1.21 or golang-1.22 To

[Bug 2056154] [NEW] Please build with golang-1.21 or golang-1.22

2024-03-05 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Public bug reported: I'd like to remove golang-1.20 from noble, but containerd-app still build-deps on it. Could you please move to a newer version. ** Affects: containerd-app (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a

Bug#1055439: RM: golang-github-docker-go-plugins-helpers [all] -- RoQA; NBS; renamed to golang-github-docker-go-plugins-helpers-dev

2024-03-01 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 04:47:22AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: ftp.debian.org > Severity: normal > > The badly named arch:all binary package has been renamed. This has been removed. = [Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023

[Bug 2055528] Re: ftbfs with golang-1.22: missing crosscall_amd64 symbol

2024-03-01 Thread Shengjing Zhu
https://github.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-report/pull/61 ** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055528 Title: ftbfs with golang-1.22: missing crosscall_amd64 symbol To manage

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2055528] Re: ftbfs with golang-1.22: missing crosscall_amd64 symbol

2024-03-01 Thread Shengjing Zhu
https://github.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-report/pull/61 ** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-report in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055528 Title: ftbfs with golang-1.22: missing

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2055528] [NEW] ftbfs with golang-1.22: missing crosscall_amd64 symbol

2024-03-01 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Public bug reported: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/708934179/buildlog_ubuntu-noble- amd64.ubuntu-report_1.7.2_BUILDING.txt.gz dpkg-gensymbols: error: some new symbols appeared in the symbols file: see diff output below dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns disappeared in the symbols

[Bug 2055528] [NEW] ftbfs with golang-1.22: missing crosscall_amd64 symbol

2024-03-01 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Public bug reported: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/708934179/buildlog_ubuntu-noble- amd64.ubuntu-report_1.7.2_BUILDING.txt.gz dpkg-gensymbols: error: some new symbols appeared in the symbols file: see diff output below dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns disappeared in the symbols

[Bug 2055357] [NEW] Sync etcd 3.4.30-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-02-28 Thread Shengjing Zhu
): Clearing password after authenticating the user. + CVE-2023-32082 (fixed in 3.4.26): LeaseTimeToLive API may return keys to clients which have no read permission on the keys -- Shengjing Zhu Wed, 28 Feb 2024 17:43:49 +0800 etcd (3.4.23-6) unstable; urgency=medium * Team upload

Bug#1064954: RM: golang-1.20 -- ROM; EOL; superseded by golang-1.21 & golang-1.22

2024-02-28 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: golang-1...@packages.debian.org, z...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:golang-1.20 User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove With the release of golang-1.22, golang-1.20 is EOL now.

[pkg-go] Bug#1064825: RM: golang-github-appc-spec -- RoQA; upstream discontinued 4 years ago

2024-02-26 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: golang-github-appc-s...@packages.debian.org, z...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:golang-github-appc-spec User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove This package is forgotten to be removed when rkt and its related

Bug#1064825: RM: golang-github-appc-spec -- RoQA; upstream discontinued 4 years ago

2024-02-26 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: golang-github-appc-s...@packages.debian.org, z...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:golang-github-appc-spec User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove This package is forgotten to be removed when rkt and its related

Bug#1064498: autopkgtest fails with golang-1.22

2024-02-23 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Source: ycmd Version: 0+20231230+git9e43034+ds-1 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: z...@debian.org Control: fowarded -1 https://github.com/ycm-core/ycmd/commit/492a771df3c3248185e8fe3a82392efe8773250e Hi, I'm going to change golang-defaults to Go 1.22, and your package's test fails to run. It

golang-defaults on ppc64

2024-02-21 Thread Shengjing Zhu
://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=891746 -- Shengjing Zhu

golang-defaults on ppc64

2024-02-21 Thread Shengjing Zhu
://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=891746 -- Shengjing Zhu

Re: grpc transition

2024-02-18 Thread Shengjing Zhu
My last attempt for the grpc-go transition is stuck at the protobuf things. One thing that might help is gprc-go is finally going to use the new protobuf library, https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/pull/6961 So we could decouple the grpc-go transition from the protobuf things. -- Shengjing Zhu

Bug#1061659: Fwd: Bug#1061659: src:golang-github-hanwen-go-fuse: fails to migrate to testing for too long: i386 autopkgtest regression

2024-01-28 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/hanwen/go-fuse/issues/502 On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 1:42 AM Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Hi Nilesh, > > You did the last upload of this package - do you have any idea about > this bug? > See https://github.com/hanwen/go-fuse/issues/502 -- Shengjing Zhu

Bug#1061659: Fwd: Bug#1061659: src:golang-github-hanwen-go-fuse: fails to migrate to testing for too long: i386 autopkgtest regression

2024-01-28 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/hanwen/go-fuse/issues/502 On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 1:42 AM Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Hi Nilesh, > > You did the last upload of this package - do you have any idea about > this bug? > See https://github.com/hanwen/go-fuse/issues/502 -- Shengjing Zhu

[pkg-go] Bug#1061659: Fwd: Bug#1061659: src:golang-github-hanwen-go-fuse: fails to migrate to testing for too long: i386 autopkgtest regression

2024-01-28 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/hanwen/go-fuse/issues/502 On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 1:42 AM Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Hi Nilesh, > > You did the last upload of this package - do you have any idea about > this bug? > See https://github.com/hanwen/go-fuse/issues/502

Re: Add Salsa pipeline to default Go pipeline?

2024-01-24 Thread Shengjing Zhu
alsa runner too. I've asked on > #salsa to see if there are any guidelines. > I'm not a salsa admin, so it's not accurate. We don't lack the runner resource, because it's on Google cloud, and we (the Debian project) have budgets for it. The Gitlab CI not only needs runner resources, but also resources on the scheduler, which is the main Gitlab instance. -- Shengjing Zhu

Re: Request removal of cadvisor?

2024-01-24 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 10:56 PM Simon Josefsson wrote: > > Shengjing Zhu writes: > > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 7:30 PM Simon Josefsson wrote: > >> Shengjing Zhu, what do you think, can we request removal of this package > >> from unstable? > >>

Re: Request removal of cadvisor? (was: Re: golang-opentelemetry-contrib-dev: Upload to unstable)

2024-01-24 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 7:30 PM Simon Josefsson wrote: > Shengjing Zhu, what do you think, can we request removal of this package > from unstable? > Why would you bother with packages that are only in unstable? I'm not sure how best to handle removal for team maintained packages. I'm no

Re: Add Salsa pipeline to default Go pipeline?

2024-01-24 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 4:07 PM Simon Josefsson wrote: > > Shengjing Zhu writes: > > >> >> How do you all QA test Go packages before uploading them without a Salsa > >> >> pipeline? Manually on local developer machine? > >> >> > >&g

Re: Add Salsa pipeline to default Go pipeline?

2024-01-22 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 3:00 AM Simon Josefsson wrote: > > Shengjing Zhu writes: > > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 11:18 PM Simon Josefsson > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi. I read about the Go teams CI/CD pipeline here: > >> > >> https://go-te

Re: Add Salsa pipeline to default Go pipeline?

2024-01-19 Thread Shengjing Zhu
s. The "test_the_archive" job would still run on the go > runner since the job is tagged, and that job would not run on the normal > shared runners either. > > /Simon -- Shengjing Zhu

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2049737] Re: autopkgtest schroot fails with network access

2024-01-18 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Skia told me the autopkgtest itself is already fixed in upstream https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/-/merge_requests/268 ** Description changed: on armhf, the schroot test was skipped previously, because it fails to create the tarball. 222s autopkgtest [16:35:34]: test

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2049737] Re: autopkgtest fails with network access

2024-01-18 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Currently the failure in autopkgtest prevents debootstrap migration. But this is not debootstrap fault. So can we ignore the failure and force debootstrap to migrate? ** Summary changed: - autopkgtest fails with network access + autopkgtest schroot fails with network access -- You received

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2049737] [NEW] autopkgtest schroot fails with network access

2024-01-18 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Public bug reported: on armhf, the schroot test was skipped previously, because it fails to create the tarball. 222s autopkgtest [16:35:34]: test schroot: [--- 224s mknod: /var/lib/schroot/unpack/tmp.b5GEblfCFW/test-dev-null: Operation not permitted 224s E: Cannot install

Bug#1060839: ITP: golang-github-adamkorcz-go-fuzz-headers-1 -- helper functions for Go fuzzing (library)

2024-01-15 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 4:28 AM Simon Josefsson wrote: > > Shengjing Zhu writes: > > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 8:51 PM Simon Josefsson wrote: > >> > >> Package: wnpp > >> Severity: wishlist > >> Owner: Simon Josefsson > >> > &

Bug#1060839: ITP: golang-github-adamkorcz-go-fuzz-headers-1 -- helper functions for Go fuzzing (library)

2024-01-15 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 4:28 AM Simon Josefsson wrote: > > Shengjing Zhu writes: > > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 8:51 PM Simon Josefsson wrote: > >> > >> Package: wnpp > >> Severity: wishlist > >> Owner: Simon Josefsson > >> > &

Re: Sigstore rekor current status and request for help

2024-01-15 Thread Shengjing Zhu
rt version upgrade between Debian releases. -- Shengjing Zhu

Bug#1060839: ITP: golang-github-adamkorcz-go-fuzz-headers-1 -- helper functions for Go fuzzing (library)

2024-01-15 Thread Shengjing Zhu
fuzz tests. For packaging rekor, I think all these fuzz tests can be stripped by file names. It seems upstream just puts all fuzz tests in "fuzz_test.go". -- Shengjing Zhu

Bug#1060839: ITP: golang-github-adamkorcz-go-fuzz-headers-1 -- helper functions for Go fuzzing (library)

2024-01-15 Thread Shengjing Zhu
fuzz tests. For packaging rekor, I think all these fuzz tests can be stripped by file names. It seems upstream just puts all fuzz tests in "fuzz_test.go". -- Shengjing Zhu

Bug#1060840: ITP: golang-k8s-sigs-release-utils -- utilities for kubernetes Go release engineering (library)

2024-01-15 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 10:25 PM Simon Josefsson wrote: > > Shengjing Zhu writes: > > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 9:27 PM Simon Josefsson wrote: > >> > >> Package: wnpp > >> Severity: wishlist > >> Owner: Simon Josefsson > >> > >

Bug#1060840: ITP: golang-k8s-sigs-release-utils -- utilities for kubernetes Go release engineering (library)

2024-01-15 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 10:25 PM Simon Josefsson wrote: > > Shengjing Zhu writes: > > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 9:27 PM Simon Josefsson wrote: > >> > >> Package: wnpp > >> Severity: wishlist > >> Owner: Simon Josefsson > >> > >

Bug#1060840: ITP: golang-k8s-sigs-release-utils -- utilities for kubernetes Go release engineering (library)

2024-01-15 Thread Shengjing Zhu
s://github.com/kubernetes/release/). > Which package will need this library? It looks strange by the name and description. We certainly don't do the release stuff for kubernetes. -- Shengjing Zhu

Bug#1060840: ITP: golang-k8s-sigs-release-utils -- utilities for kubernetes Go release engineering (library)

2024-01-15 Thread Shengjing Zhu
s://github.com/kubernetes/release/). > Which package will need this library? It looks strange by the name and description. We certainly don't do the release stuff for kubernetes. -- Shengjing Zhu

Bug#1055087: golang-1.21: Add support for loong64

2024-01-06 Thread Shengjing Zhu
19 version, and currently > > all dependencies for building golang-1.21 package on debian sid have been > > met. Golang-1.21 on loong64 can now be built. > Could you look at the failures when bootstrapping Go 1.22? https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=golang-1.22=loong64=1.22%7Erc1-2=170456=0 -- Shengjing Zhu

Re: google/mock -> go.uber.org/mock ?

2024-01-05 Thread Shengjing Zhu
.6.0 -> 0.4.0). If we reuse old packages, we need to introduce epochs, which is not ideal. So new source and binary packages are preferred. > it's needed by quick-go 0.40 and surely soon many others. > > Jérémy -- Shengjing Zhu

Bug#1059860: ITP: golang-github-quic-go-quic-go -- A QUIC implementation in pure go

2024-01-03 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 6:14 PM Félix Sipma wrote: > > On 2024-01-02 22:32+0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > >On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 10:27 PM Félix Sipma wrote: > >> > >> Package: wnpp > >> Severity: wishlist > >> Owner: Félix Sipma > >&g

Bug#1059860: ITP: golang-github-quic-go-quic-go -- A QUIC implementation in pure go

2024-01-03 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 6:14 PM Félix Sipma wrote: > > On 2024-01-02 22:32+0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > >On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 10:27 PM Félix Sipma wrote: > >> > >> Package: wnpp > >> Severity: wishlist > >> Owner: Félix Sipma > >&g

Bug#1059860: ITP: golang-github-quic-go-quic-go -- A QUIC implementation in pure go

2024-01-02 Thread Shengjing Zhu
should be better to rename the Debian package when upstream moved their code location. But I was too lazy to go through NEW when I updated the package. -- Shengjing Zhu

Bug#1059860: ITP: golang-github-quic-go-quic-go -- A QUIC implementation in pure go

2024-01-02 Thread Shengjing Zhu
should be better to rename the Debian package when upstream moved their code location. But I was too lazy to go through NEW when I updated the package. -- Shengjing Zhu

Re: go-team/packages/golang-k8s-client-go

2024-01-02 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 6:24 PM Jérémy Lal wrote: > > > > Le mar. 2 janv. 2024 à 11:18, Shengjing Zhu a écrit : >> >> On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 5:58 PM Jérémy Lal wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > Le mar. 2 janv. 2024 à 06:50, Shengjing Zhu a é

Re: go-team/packages/golang-k8s-client-go

2024-01-02 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 5:58 PM Jérémy Lal wrote: > > > > Le mar. 2 janv. 2024 à 06:50, Shengjing Zhu a écrit : >> >> On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 2:34 AM Jérémy Lal wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > Le lun. 1 janv. 2024 à 19:29, Domenico Andreol

Re: go-team/packages/golang-k8s-client-go

2024-01-01 Thread Shengjing Zhu
ward would be to drop it so I can re-create it. > No, the repo is good, please don't force push it. Please use the `gbp import-orig --upstream-vcs-tag` option to import upstream new versions. -- Shengjing Zhu

[Cross-toolchain-base-devs] Bug#1025521: FTBFS: cannot change owner and permissions of 'debian/...'

2024-01-01 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Source: cross-toolchain-base Version: 62 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: z...@debian.org https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rbuild/unstable/amd64/cross-toolchain-base_62.rbuild.log.gz dh_installdirs -plinux-libc-dev-amd64-cross \ usr/share/doc/linux-libc-dev-amd64-cross \

Bug#1058795: installing docker.io makes all qemu guests lose internet connection

2023-12-28 Thread Shengjing Zhu
e with existing firewall rules. For example, in my case I use > nftables, and after docker.io is installed, I had to > Does the suggestion on https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865975 help? TLDR, please enable net.ipv4.ip_forward before starting docker. -- Shengjing Zhu

Re: RFS: golang-google-grpc + golang-github-google-s2a-go

2023-12-25 Thread Shengjing Zhu
protobuf and grpc-go. For safety, yes please upload to experimental, and people can try rebuilding their packages and test them. > I realise I'm speaking at a very surface level so I am adding in Shengjing > (zhsj) to the > thread and recluse myself from any uploads for this package meanwhile. > > Best, > Nilesh -- Shengjing Zhu

Re: RPS: golang-github-go-jose-go-jose.v3

2023-12-10 Thread Shengjing Zhu
e the salsa repo with command `dh-make-golang create-salsa-project`, as it will do the right settings for you. -- Shengjing Zhu

Bug#1056223: abydos autopkg tests fail with Python 3.12

2023-11-30 Thread Shengjing Zhu
X-Debbugs-CC: j...@debian.org Control: tags -1 patch On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 11:39:31AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:abydos > Version: 0.5.0+git20201231.344346a-6 > Severity: important > Tags: sid trixie > User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: python3.12 > > abydos

Bug#1057043: RFS: goauthing/2.2.1-1 [ITP] -- CLI authentication utility for srun4000 systems

2023-11-29 Thread Shengjing Zhu
t -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/goauthing/goauthing_2.2.1-1.dsc > > Changes for the initial release: > > goauthing (2.2.1-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium > . > * Initial release (Closes: #1057029) > The name goauthing is too generic. The cli name is auth-thu, could the package name be renamed to auth-thu as well? -- Shengjing Zhu

Bug#1057043: RFS: goauthing/2.2.1-1 [ITP] -- CLI authentication utility for srun4000 systems

2023-11-29 Thread Shengjing Zhu
t -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/goauthing/goauthing_2.2.1-1.dsc > > Changes for the initial release: > > goauthing (2.2.1-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium > . > * Initial release (Closes: #1057029) > The name goauthing is too generic. The cli name is auth-thu, could the package name be renamed to auth-thu as well? -- Shengjing Zhu

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >