Permissions are good - file is owned by assp user. Contents of file:
2.2.1(12221)
Your version.txt is from the public version 2.2.1(12221) not from the dev
version 2.2.2(12221).
stop assp
delete the file version.txt
start assp
Thomas
Von:Daniel L. Miller dmil...@amfes.com
An:
Hi all,
2012-08-14
fixed in assp 2.2.2 build 12227:
added:
'EmailAdminDomains','Restrict Email Admins to Domains*',
Use this parameter to restrict users registered in EmailAdmins,
EmailAdminReportsTo and EmailBlockTo to a
list of domains or users, for which they can request BlockReports.
Hello
I am seeing some spam passing in a server with a way I can't explain me , like
this below
Aug-13-12 18:27:11 id-34489-05168 83.167.236.63 seeks...@download-college.com
to: e...@eb.com Message-Score: added 5 for SpamFriends, total score for this
message is now 5;
Aug-13-12 18:27:11
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schrei
bt:
83.167.236.63 seeks...@download-college.com to: e...@eb.com message
ok [Sale Specials ... New Savings!] - /usr/local/assp/okmail/Sale_S
pecials_New_Savings__411.eml;
seeks...@download-college.com and 83.167.236.63 are
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schrei
bt:
/usr/local/assp/okmail/S
Forget my first respone.
There is a cosmetic bug, because ASSP is seeing a local string. Will
be fixed-
--
Live
Hi all,
I've just done a small statistic about the installed V2 development
versions. There are too many old and very and very very old dev versions
installed.
It does not help to test and to improve assp, if the test list users are
not following the development steps.
If you use any of the
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schrei
bt:
It does not help to test and to improve assp, if the test list users a
re
not following the development steps.
If you use any of the old versions below, please upgrade to the latest
development version.
I propose a
after nn days it
will warn , after nn+10 it will stop working
Hmm.., 'stop working' would be a problem if assp is running as daemon or
service - it will be started over and over again and will fillup the disk
writing the maillog.txt and possibly other system logs.
I don't want to cow somebody
Hi
I having trouble with slow senders and large email and ASSP_AFC_Plugin
the problem is this,
The slow sender initiates the the conversation and Assp´s opens a session
to the MTA behind ASSP,
But no real data is sent to to the MTA, as the mail must be saved in Assp
for the AV scan and during
Slow senders with bigmail
O .. how i love it. That's like going shopping in Moscows GUM in the
1980's.
and large email and ASSP_AFC_Plugin
There are some more possible reasons to queue the complete mail, not only
the AFC plugin.
I can only set this timeout to 600 secs
Why ? In assp
V1 only
I did some testing for the relevance of a failing PTR and/or MXA. Sice
two weeks i even disabled the checks. The results were as expected: AS
SP worked nicely without PTR/MXA checks - the results were even better
, because the new Bayesian filter scoring sees SPAM/NOTSPAM more exact
ly.
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schrei
bt:
Attached is a screenshot of how it
looks.
Did he try to click to see the mail in a browser?
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live
Yes I do check every one of them new ones.
Keep in mind: ASSP provides no way back in versions (only forward). It is
possible that you have to backup and to restore all file and databases to
get a way back!
If you only exchange the assp.pl to go back in versions, the behavior of
assp could be
Yes, she did. It looks the same (also missing the attached pictures).
It is configured to be in HTML format only. Also, to only show the link
on the left. It's always worked for us that way.
I'm looking in her mailbox and I don't see a report for today (which
already ran for the day). I'm
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schrei
bt:
Ive seen this since it was introduced but was told it was my mail clie
nt.
Well since then i have tried all mail clients i can get my hands on fo
r mac or windows and they all show these exact same symtoms since day
one.
Nope latest v2 dev on win2k8r2sp1
Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [f...@iworld.de]
Received: Tuesday, 14 Aug 2012, 7:52am
To: ASSP development mailing list [assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net]
Subject: Re: [Assp-test]
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schrei
bt:
Nope latest v2 dev on win2k8r2sp1
Then please give some information about the problem in V2.
We are discussing here an V1 Problem.
--
Live
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schrei
bt:
By chance, did blockreport.css get updated? The modified date on mine
is 3-9-2012.
Download ASSP_1.9.4.0-Install.zip, there should be the newst image fol
der.
I will send a screenshot after chemo. And to the correct list sorry. Brains
fuddled
Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [f...@iworld.de]
Received: Tuesday, 14 Aug 2012, 8:05am
To: ASSP development mailing list
indeed the email contains this string with local
one choice for locals looking
Graziano
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schrei
bt:
/usr/local/assp/okmail/S
Forget my first respone.
There is a cosmetic bug, because ASSP is seeing a local string. Will
be
Well, It was working in at least 1.9.7.3(0.0.01). See pictures:
http://imgur.com/QkrCR (Top of email)
http://imgur.com/uvDrd (Bottom of email)
Kind Regards,
Brett
-Original Message-
From: Steve Moffat [mailto:st...@optimum.bm]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 7:48 AM
To:
Hi there!
First out, the ASSP-server(ASSP version 2.2.2(12164)) does not run Ipv6 and
it's not active in ASSP.
Now to the problem:
Our ASSP got a mail with the following headers (some info exchanged with x's
and a y)
Received: from x.x.net ([xx.xxx.xx.xxx] helo=x.x.net)
by smtp.x.se with
Will do!
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:f...@iworld.de]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 8:03 AM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.9.7.3(0.0.04) Block Reports
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schrei
bt:
Although you didn't provide the entire IPv6, I am guessing that it is the v4
tunneling over v6 format (e.g. v6 encapsulated v4 address). Therefore
processing the 42.157.66.61 as a v4 42.157.66.61 address is correct.
Tom
On Aug 14, 2012, at 7:41 AM, Pontus Hellgren wrote:
Hi there!
First
disable 'enhancedOriginIPDetect' if you don't want this behavior
but this
Received: from y.x.net
([:::::x:42.157.66.61])
looks like y.x.net has used this IP and has attached the IPv4 Part - which
is black and should be blocked.
How ever - assp behaves like expected.
You
From: Fritz Borgstedt f...@iworld.de
I propose a retention period for developer versions, after nn days it
will warn , after nn+10 it will stop working.
uh... turn ASSP into some kind of time-bombed kids game ? Are you serious ?
I see this message during rebuild:
Aug-14-12 06:11:33 warning: 'useDB4Rebuild' is set to on, but 'BerkeleyDB' nor
'DB_File' are available - the rebuild spamdb process uses the internal
'orderedtie' and will possibly require more time and a large amount of memory -
check
Manny thanks!
Love quick answers!
Regards,
Pontus
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Eckardt [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com]
Sent: den 14 augusti 2012 14:40
To: pontus.karls...@scandinavianhosting.se; ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Antwort: [Assp-test] Valid ipv4 mail droped
(I'm running Activestate 64 bit on Win 2003 Server). Any idea why it's
not working?
Seems you don't read install instructions! The ASSP-V2 module installer
would have installed all required modules and if not, it would have shown
why.
Don't use a 64 Bit Perl on windows - this leads in to a
I installed ASSP-V2 early on in it's life, and didn't think it automatically
installed all required perl modules! (Or I just didn't realize it). I had to
compile some perl modules manually to get them to install...
I confirmed that according to AS Perl, I have DB_File 1.820 installed.
Isn't blockstrictSPFRe independent of whether or not SPFWL is checked
(meaning it will always check)? I don't know why, but I thought it was.
Thanks,
Brett
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Hickman [mailto:nhick...@dtechlabs.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 8:57 AM
To: ASSP
There is a file 'assp/moduleLoadErrors.txt' - if a module could not be
loaded, the reason could be found there.
Or in GUI-Module Setup - click at the small 'i' right beside the
headline.
Or in GUI-Infos and Stats-Perl Modules - click at 'show module load
errors' in the second line
I think
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schrei
bt:
I installed ASSP-V2 early on in it's life, and didn't think it automat
ically installed all required perl modules! (Or I just didn't realize
it). I had to compile some perl modules manually to get them to insta
ll...
Just
33 matches
Mail list logo
