[Assp-test] MaintBayesCollection

I just realized I've had MaintBayesCollection set to off for some time - but the rebuildspamdb log shows deletion of files at each execution. -- Daniel -- vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.

[Assp-test] Secondary Interface Header Links

The Mail Analyzer, View Maillog Tail, and Shutdown Secondary have the secondary port in the links - while the White/Redlist/Tuplets, SMTP Connections, and Info Stats have the primary port. Is this intentional? -- Daniel

Re: [Assp-test] Strip out last MTA IP/host for checks?

On 5/20/2011 9:58 AM, Michelle Dupuis wrote: We have an MTA on the edge through which all mail flows (and ASSP is behind it). Is there a way for Assp to strip off the last MTA IP/Hostname for bad host checks, etc? (I posted this a month ago to the -test list but got no response...sorry to

[Assp-test] Feature request: independent maillog interface

My apologies for any typos - doing this from my phone.  I just had an instance where my office was complaining about blocked senders while I was out. I tried to remotely access assp via my phone vpn, but couldn't get the page to load.  Falling back to ssh, I found in the log that aol had been

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Feature Request: Scoring Stats

Working great! Thanks!  Sent from my Samsung Epic™ 4G Touch Daniel Original message Subject: Antwort: Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Feature Request: Scoring Stats From: Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com To: dmil...@amfes.com,ASSP development mailing list

[Assp-test] TNEF

I believe TNEF conversions were working - but I just received an email with a winmail.dat that appears unconverted. I see the mail in ASSP's log, messages include good HELO, Whitelisted Sender Domain, and noProcessing. My settings include doInFixTNEF and convertNP, while keepInTNEF is

Re: [Assp-test] TNEF

On 10/20/2013 9:34 PM, Thomas Eckardt wrote: noProcessing - do not process !!! no conversion will be done on such mails Thomas But I have selected convertNP - doesn't that override? -- Daniel -- October Webinars:

[Assp-test] Links in log

I notice that sometimes in my log the IP's and email addresses are clickable links - and sometimes they are not. What determines if a link is supposed to be generated vs just text? -- Daniel -- CenturyLink Cloud:

[Assp-test] Selectively strip headers on sent mail

Is there any option that would let me strip a header (in particular, the return-receipt request) from outgoing mails based on the recipient? -- Daniel -- Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7

[Assp-test] Recipient Replacement

I just saw a popup - coding error: config value is not equal config hash in ReplaceRecpt - please report to development! -- Daniel -- Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out: #149;

[Assp-test] IP's from router

I just realized, that apparently for some time now I'm not seeing external IP's in my ASSP logs - just the IP of my router. Suggestions on where I should look to find the problem? -- Daniel -- Time is money. Stop

[Assp-test] Unsupported bDat

Having trouble sending an attachment - never seen this error before: Jun-30-1407:14:3837678-11881[Worker_1][TLS-in][TLS-out]*98.167.72.49**dmil...@amfes.com*info:foundmessagesizeannouncement:3.26MByte

[Assp-test] Regex blocking exempted senders

I've been having ongoing problems this past month with bomb matches. Previously it was against remote senders - now it hit me trying to send a valid email. I had disabled the header regex checks previously - now I've disabled all the regex blocks. I'm a valid authenticated sender. It

Re: [Assp-test] ClamAV - ASSP version 2.4.4(15004)

Does this mean the senders in question are still in NoProcessingDomains? Daniel On 1/19/2015 2:17 AM, Doug Lytle wrote: Thomas Eckardt wrote: noScanIP I can't reproduce this issue - it works for me. After moving the 2 IP addresses out of the web interface and into a file

Re: [Assp-test] Huh? Remote Support option

requiring constant firewall access. -- Daniel -- Original Message -- From: K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com To: Daniel Miller dmil...@amfes.com; ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: 2/10/2015 2:21:31 PM Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Huh? Remote Support option Thanks Daniel

Re: [Assp-test] BombHeaderRe/BombSuspiciousRe matching against Noprocessing Whitelist

Thank you - I never read that section before. I've added !!!N-W-LI-!!! To the top of all my regex files. Hopefully this gives me the results I want. -- Daniel On 1/11/2015 12:07 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote: Hi Daniel, files/suspiciousre.txt[line 1]): What is the content of line 1 of this

Re: [Assp-test] BombHeaderRe/BombSuspiciousRe matching against Noprocessing Whitelist

Or did I get that wrong...should have been !!!N-W-L-I-!!! -- Daniel On 1/11/2015 12:29 AM, Daniel Miller wrote: Thank you - I never read that section before. I've added !!!N-W-LI-!!! To the top of all my regex files. Hopefully this gives me the results I want. -- Daniel On 1/11

Re: [Assp-test] BombHeaderRe/BombSuspiciousRe matching against Noprocessing Whitelist

, every mail will be blocked - regardeless any setting Thomas Von: Daniel Miller dmil...@amfes.com An: Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com Datum: 11.01.2015 09:44 Betreff: Re: [Assp-test] BombHeaderRe/BombSuspiciousRe matching against Noprocessing Whitelist

Re: [Assp-test] Huh? Remote Support option

Remote support is for temporary admin access. -- Daniel -- Original Message -- From: K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: 2/10/2015 7:51:03 AM Subject: [Assp-test] Huh? Remote Support option How does the Remote Support

[Assp-test] BombHeaderRe/BombSuspiciousRe matching against Noprocessing Whitelist

Not sure why - I sender I used to receive from regularly is now being blocked by regexes. They are in NoProcessing, sometimes also Whitelist. I can see the noprocessing whitelist matches in the log - and then the regex scores it high enough to block it. bombReNP, bombReWL, bombReLocal are

Re: [Assp-test] Prevent certain domains to be used with amiguous origin (as anti-phishing)

The question is can you define a static list of sending IP's for a domain? If you can then ASSP can be told only to accept email for a domain from those IP's. There are several options for this. One option is use SPFoverride, and define a strict policy for the domain(s) in question -

[Assp-test] Rollback changes from hacked account

I have a whitelisted sender, an internal account, that was recently compromised.  As a result, quite a few garbage mails got sent out - I found out when my own messages were getting blocked by DNSBL checks and found 5000+ messages in the queue. So...changed the password, deleted the queue,

[Assp-test] Remove headers by recipient

Is there a way to strip headers from outgoing messages based on recipient?  In particular, I want to be able to remove return-receipt requests sent to a particular external recipient even from whitelisted senders. -- Daniel

[Assp-test] Detect URL spoofing

Is there an existing test that will detect "false labels" in URL's? Where there's a link like: http://bad.com/tracking=12345;>https://good.com -- Daniel -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's

[Assp-test] test

-- Daniel L. Miller, VP - Engineering, SET AM Fire & Electronic Services, Inc. [AMFES] dmil...@amfes.com 702-312-5276 -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites,

Re: [Assp-test] Possible feature requests

wrote: :: On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 08:38:34 -0700 :: <amfes.93522e7ae3.15cef5aa0a8.27fe.f870105bb83edc7531c2ac44777e3...@amfes.com> :: Daniel Miller <dmil...@amfes.com> wrote: Again, my request is to auto-block *IPs* of *failed* auths. Not lock the account. Not block valid auths. Regular use

[Assp-test] Possible feature requests

I'm not saying either of these are good ideas - just wondering. Like everybody I see a lot of hack attempts. One possibility I'm considering is when a given local account name is tried - but with wrong passwords - that account is flagged and all further invalid logins are added to a

Re: [Assp-test] Possible feature requests

if it is valid. - Bob On 6/27/2017 3:21 PM, Daniel Miller wrote: I'm suggesting having settings MaxAUTHErrorsAllIPs (number of bad logins for a given user across ALL IP's) -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one

Re: [Assp-test] Possible feature requests

on so that users didn't enable it blindly. Just my thoughts. Peter -Original Message----- From: Daniel Miller [mailto:dmil...@amfes.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 2:10 PM To: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Possible feature requests

Re: [Assp-test] Possible feature requests

Exactly. Just opening a discussion on whether such might be beneficial integrated in ASSP. Daniel On June 28, 2017 8:32:52 AM Doug Lytle via Assp-test wrote: My initial reaction to this was "cool idea!", but then I thought about the implications to valid

Re: [Assp-test] Possible feature requests

On June 28, 2017 8:40:31 AM Daniel Miller <dmil...@amfes.com> wrote: Exactly. Just opening a discussion on whether such might be beneficial integrated in ASSP. Daniel On June 28, 2017 8:32:52 AM Doug Lytle via Assp-test <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: My init

[Assp-test] iPhone SSL connections

I'm having problems with some iPhone clients. I do see the following message in my logs: warning: got an unexpected SSLv3/TLS handshake Client-Helo-Frame of version (03.01) from IP '192.168.0.114' at local IP '192.168.0.4' and Port '25' - this frame is ignored Does this mean anything? --

[Assp-test] dmarc rejections

Having enabled DMARC checking I receive a number of failed delivery responses from (I assume) badly configured servers. Is there an another way of dealing with this besides manually adding such domains to noDMARCReportDomain? -- Daniel

Re: [Assp-test] Postfix (or probably any SMTP server) logs

On 7/26/2017 11:25 AM, Doug Lytle via Assp-test wrote: Is there something I can adjust to have the "true" external sender IP and the attempt login name exposed in my mail server logs? I run fail2ban on the ASSP server and it drops the connections That's actually where I'm going - I just wanted

[Assp-test] Postfix (or probably any SMTP server) logs

Looking in my mail server's logs, I see a lot of entries similar to: Jul 23 06:34:34 daisy assp/smtpd[20956]: connect from localhost[127.0.0.1] Jul 23 06:34:38 daisy assp/smtpd[20956]: warning: localhost[127.0.0.1]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6 Jul 23 06:34:38 daisy

Re: [Assp-test] (no subject)

I apologize for the spam send - obviously the wrong reporting address was used! Daniel -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

[Assp-test] (no subject)

Forwarded Message Subject:DCAA/FAR Gov't Accnting/Audit Seminar-August 22-23 2017 Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:24:37 -0400 From: Gov-Con Solutions Reply-To: agehr...@gov-con.com To: dmil...@amfes.com DCAA/FAR Government Compliance

[Assp-test] Fwd: [MessageLimit] Three pieces of good news

-- Daniel L. Miller, VP - Engineering, SET AM Fire & Electronic Services, Inc. [AMFES] dmil...@amfes.com 702-312-5276 -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!

[Assp-test] DMARC report rejections

It seems there are more than a few sites with bad DMARC implementations - they define a reporting address and then reject mail sent to it.  At the moment, the only options I know of are either to turn off "DoDMARC" or manually update "noDMARCReportDomain". Is there a way to enable DMARC

Re: [Assp-test] Generate DKIM signatures

What else can I check or post to try to fix this?  I still do not have DKIM signatures. -- Daniel On 1/17/2018 2:06 PM, Daniel Miller via Assp-test wrote: Nope. Looks like a clean startup. -- Daniel On 1/17/2018 1:37 PM, Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp. wrote: Daniel - any module

Re: [Assp-test] Generate DKIM signatures

ple: Algorithm=rsa-sha1 Method=relaxed/relaxed Headers=Message-ID:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type KeyFile=full_path_to_your_privat_key.pem Mode=DKIM that's all - really simple Thomas Von: "Daniel Miller via Assp-test" <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> An: "

Re: [Assp-test] Generate DKIM signatures

Nope.  Looks like a clean startup. -- Daniel On 1/17/2018 1:37 PM, Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp. wrote: Daniel - any module load errors in moduleLoadErrors.txt? - Bob On 1/16/2018 2:36 PM, Daniel Miller via Assp-test wrote: I thought I had DKIM configured & enabled - obvio

[Assp-test] Generate DKIM signatures

I thought I had DKIM configured & enabled - obviously that's not the case as my messages aren't being signed.  Mail::DKIM is installed (both Ubuntu Xenial package and local CPAN compiled install).  I have a DKIMgenConfig defined, genDKIM is enabled, and a key has been generated and saved. In

Re: [Assp-test] large domain SPF failures

I'm sure this works - but I don't understand how. Where did you come up with that single IP address? --- Daniel On 2018-09-26 22:14, Thomas Eckardt wrote: I use efax.com=>v=spf1 ip4:66.52.2.3 -all in 'SPFoverride' Thomas Von: "Daniel Miller via Assp-test" An:

[Assp-test] large domain SPF failures

We've received a quantity of junk impersonating good domains - not sure how to handle it. An example: efax.com SPF record v=spf1 mx include:_spf.salesforce.com -all So they're depending on salesforce. Ok...what do they have? v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.salesforce.com

Re: [Assp-test] Submission with Postfix & ASSP

On 12/10/2018 5:06 AM, James Brown via Assp-test wrote: I’m trying to properly setup Postfix, ASSP, and Dovecot are on the same machine. My problem is with users submitting emails. I think Postfix needs to listen on port 465 and send to ASSP on port 25. ASSP then sends back to Postfix on

Re: [Assp-test] Submission with Postfix & ASSP

On 12/10/2018 2:59 PM, James Brown via Assp-test wrote: On 11 Dec 2018, at 8:55 am, Daniel Miller via Assp-test <mailto:assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>> wrote: On 12/10/2018 5:06 AM, James Brown via Assp-test wrote: I’m trying to properly setup Postfix, ASSP, and Dovecot are on

Re: [Assp-test] Submission with Postfix & ASSP

Based on your ASSP log it seems it's not reaching Postfix. First, verify Postfix is listening.     lsof -i :126 You're showing your master.cf has port 126 open for all IP's - I'd suggest explicitly declaring it for the localhost:     127.0.0.1:126    inet    n    etc. But regardless - make

Re: [Assp-test] Submission with Postfix & ASSP

, Daniel Miller <mailto:dmil...@amfes.com>> wrote: Ok - so you have Postfix listening.  There's a few different choices available to have Postfix forward to ASSP.  I would recommend using Postfix's before-queue content filter method. The entries you've setup in master.cf already are

Re: [Assp-test] Submission with Postfix & ASSP

Um...where's your port 125 listener? Daniel On 12/16/2018 3:56 PM, James Brown wrote: master.cf (non-commented out stuff only): pickup    unix  n     -       n       60      1       pickup cleanup   unix  n     -       n       -       0       cleanup qmgr      unix  n     -       n       300

Re: [Assp-test] Submission with Postfix & ASSP

0025 & 10026 - but let's leave that for later when everything else is working if you really want it. Daniel On 12/14/2018 8:28 AM, Daniel Miller via Assp-test wrote: Ok - so you have Postfix listening.  There's a few different choices available to have Postfix forward to ASSP.  I wo

[Assp-test] variable TLS support?

I just setup a new server with the latest ASSP, Postfix, Dovecot on Ubuntu 18.04 Bionic.  It's been a while since I had to adjust parameters since things have Just Worked for quite a while.  But now... TLS really gave me a headache - I believe some default behaviors changed in Postfix that

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.2 *Fortress* build 18361

On 1/24/2019 6:20 AM, K Post wrote: Daniel, What value do you have for DoNoFromSelect? I use 61, exactly for the reasons you mentioned.  63 is the default in your version.  Thomas changed this default in 19015 - the default value for 'DoNoFromSelect' is changed from 63 to 59

[Assp-test] ccSpamNeverRe not working

Version 2.6.4b19019.  I've set ccSpamNeverRe to "file:files/ccSpamNeverRe" which now contains: bad attachment DNSBL Blocked IP-Country .*DNSBL.* Yet my sendAllSpam recipient continues to receive messages.  Am I using them incorrectly? -- Daniel

Re: [Assp-test] Searchin maillog, highlight -> context selection error

This is an historic issue.  The log parser shows the matches via html - those tags confuse the log parser which generates the address links.  Some significant work would be required to avoid this - which I imagine is why the authors haven't implemented it. The workaround is after a successful

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.2 *Fortress* build 18361

On 12/27/2018 5:56 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote: - 'DoNoFromRemovesNPWL' is now moved to the GUI 'DoNoFromRemovesNPWL','DoNoFrom Removes NP, WL Flag','0:disabled|1:whitelisted|2:noprocessing|3:both'  'If the combination of DoNoFrom , DoNoFromSelect , DoNoFromWL and DoNoFromNP gives more than one

[Assp-test] Per sender+recipient attachment permission

The following userAttach isn't quite doing what I need: ~opendocument => odt|ods *@mydomain.com => block-out => ~opendocument *@mydomain.com => good-in => .* This blocks any outgoing opendocuments - but doesn't allow sending within my domain.  Is that possible? -- Daniel

Re: [Assp-test] DKIMpassAction use case?

On 6/6/2019 6:53 AM, K Post wrote: Now that DKIMpassAction is no longer just a hidden option, can you explain use scenarios again?  I understand what the GUI is saying, I just can think of reasons why anyone would want anything other than the (newly) 0 default. DKIMWL and DKIMNP has been

Re: [Assp-test] localaddresses_flat vs localdomains

rote: it means: don't do VRFY definitions in LocalAddresses_Flat - do them in localDomains If both parameters contain a VRFY definition for the same domain, the one in localDomains has a higher priority (and is used). Thomas Von: "Daniel Miller via Assp-test" An: "assp-te

[Assp-test] localaddresses_flat vs localdomains

I'm confused by the help text for LocalAddresses_Flat - "NOTICE: The VRFY definition described below is deprecated in this configuration parameter - use localDomains instead!" Does this mean when using VRFY only localDomains is required? Or does it mean the help text for LocalAddresses_Flat

Re: [Assp-test] Fwd: Happening again: specific DNS query keeps hanging ASSP

Even though I'm probably way off - can I ask you to clarify a couple items? Is the problem a specific domain, i.e. spopessentials2.com? Because I can't find that domain, or any of the hosts you've listed, via my own lookups. Host/Dig/Nslookup return immediately (with no result). What are

[Assp-test] Testing new server - gmail/hotmail timeout with TLS

I'm now more confused than usual. I've setup a new server - and it *was* working fine...but then I actually really truly enabled TLS in ASSP (Note to all - if you're going to use certbot's "live" certs directly from any other program make sure you have proper read/enter access to the "live"

Re: [Assp-test] Testing new server - gmail/hotmail timeout with TLS

On 4/19/2019 9:11 PM, MK wrote: Are you using fullchain.pem or cert.pem?  It sounds like you’re missing an intermediate certificate which fullchain.pem includes. “fullchain.pem: All certificates, *including* server certificate (aka leaf certificate or end-entity certificate). The server

Re: [Assp-test] Testing new server - gmail/hotmail timeout with TLS

On 4/20/2019 12:25 AM, Daniel Miller via Assp-test wrote: Part of my confusion comes from the fact that some senders were able to communicate - including my primary server. I just figured out that by default - Postfix does not *send* via tls. That has to be explicitly enabled by a settings

Re: [Assp-test] Testing new server - everybody timeout with TLS

On 4/20/2019 1:39 PM, Daniel Miller via Assp-test wrote: On 4/20/2019 12:25 AM, Daniel Miller via Assp-test wrote: Some more digging... Shutting down ASSP and setting Postfix to listen directly to port 25 (by simply editing the listener formerly on port 125 for ASSP's smtpDestination

Re: [Assp-test] Fwd: Happening again: specific DNS query keeps hanging ASSP

information is thin here. *Thoughts appreciated*. DNSretrans: 1 also DNSReuseSocket is checked. On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 12:00 PM Daniel Miller via Assp-test <mailto:assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>> wrote: What are your settings for: UseLocalDNS DNSServers (obfuscate i

Re: [Assp-test] Testing new server - everybody timeout with TLS

On 4/21/2019 8:29 AM, Doug Lytle wrote: On 4/21/19 10:51 AM, Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp. wrote: cert.pem is used for SSLCertFile privkey.pem is used for SSLKeyFile fullchain.pem is used for SSLCAFile I am doing this as well. I've tried this - no different. So there's

Re: [Assp-test] Testing new server - everybody timeout with TLS

I'm now officially as confused as I can get. I *thought* the problem was related to SSL_version - and I *thought* I had it fixed. Nope. As I write this - TLS is working. With the default SSL_version & SSL_cipher_list. And it was working yesterday. Test sites like Hardenize.com and

Re: [Assp-test] Testing new server - everybody timeout with TLS

On 4/22/2019 1:46 AM, Doug Lytle wrote: On 4/22/19 12:07 AM, Daniel Miller via Assp-test wrote: Do I need to add anything to smtpDestinationSSL - even though I'm not using listenPortSSL? My TLS and SSL settings below.  Just to also make sure, that your DNS destination matches your

Re: [Assp-test] Testing new server - everybody timeout with TLS

On 4/22/2019 1:46 AM, Doug Lytle wrote: On 4/22/19 12:07 AM, Daniel Miller via Assp-test wrote: Do I need to add anything to smtpDestinationSSL - even though I'm not using listenPortSSL? My TLS and SSL settings below.  Just to also make sure, that your DNS destination matches your

[Assp-test] Run external script on report

I use the unofficial clamav signature update script from: https://github.com/extremeshok/clamav-unofficial-sigs And the resulting databases have been catching a few more spams. However, recently I had an issue with false positives. Using the block-report feature I'm able to allow

Re: [Assp-test] noPB and NoPBWhite based on reverse dns

On 9/14/2019 2:26 PM, K Post wrote: Daniel, I don't think that using only the MX records (inbound addresses) for yahoo is going to cut it, plus yahoo uses different IP's for the same hostname based on geolocation. Ok...but (here's another opportunity to display my ignorance) what's the

Re: [Assp-test] Run external script on report

-users can't possibly implement. Is there presently any hook where an external program can be called via the email interface? Daniel On 9/13/2019 2:49 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote: use SuspiciousVirus Thomas Von: "Daniel Miller via Assp-test" An: "ASSP development maili

Re: [Assp-test] noPB and NoPBWhite based on reverse dns

On 9/13/2019 9:31 AM, K Post wrote: This hit us again yesterday.  Lot's of yahoo spam, from Yahoo mail servers, slipping through because of pbWhite. Quick summary: I want to be able to block any yahoo mail based on HMM /bayes alone, and I don't want a PB white listing for the sending IP to

Re: [Assp-test] Trouble removing from whitelist (global and personal)

moval syntax since the introduction of the personal whitelists all those years ago   Maybe so and I never noticed because the gui seems to say I was successful on submit. Verify says otherwise. On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 7:49 PM Daniel Miller via Assp-test <_assp-test@lists.sourceforge.n

Re: [Assp-test] Trouble removing from whitelist (global and personal)

On 9/24/2019 9:25 AM, K Post wrote: Our users got a CEO spoofing email from a Gmail address.  One user replied, whitelisting the gmail address.  All is reported, now I just want to remove the address from the whitelist. I can't get the address out of the whitelist.  I've got no idea why.

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.6 *SPAM-Evaporator* build 21328

On 11/24/2021 5:08:00 AM, "Thomas Eckardt" wrote: changed: - In rare cases it was possible to overload assp by sending a large mail to many recipients. This can now prevented by configuring the hidden parameter 'maxSMTPipRelaySessions' - if used, it should be set one less than the

[Assp-test] Auto plugin update

Is a subscription to the global penalty box service required for auto-updates of the ASSP plugins? -- Daniel___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

[Assp-test] Empty folder created on startup

At some point soon after ASSP starts a folder is created in the main assp folder. It's named "dbe254..." looks like it's over 60 characters long. It's empty - I never see anything in it. I can remove the folder but it's always re-created. What is this? --

Re: [Assp-test] Empty folder created on startup

encrypted folder name. Thomas Von: "Daniel Miller via Assp-test" An:"ASSP development mailing list" Kopie:"Daniel Miller" Datum:09.03.2022 03:26 Betreff:[As

Re: [Assp-test] Empty folder created on startup

e: Looks like your assp.cfg contains an invalid encrypted folder name. Thomas Von:"Daniel Miller via Assp-test" An:"ASSP development mailing list" Kopie:"Daniel Miller" Datum:09.03.2022 03:26