On 07/04/2013 08:49 AM, Gianni Fioretta wrote:
Hi, we have a faxserver with Asterisk, IAXModem and Hylafax.
Faxes come from a SIP trunk to Asterisk, then are forwarded throught 5
IAXModems managed with Hylafax.
Hylafax users can also send faxes to these modems and Asterisk send them
throught
On 11/05/2012 04:18 PM, Roy Abshire wrote:
What is the best way for me to setup Fax Capability with VOIP only.
You can use T.38, perhaps, if your VoIP provider supports it and you can
get it working. But unless you need faxes to go through the telephony
system (i.e. you have fax machines
On 10/04/2012 09:27 AM, Carlos Alvarez wrote:
However I'd just suggest that you look at the business case for
screwing around with fax at all. As a society, if we had decided to
stop supporting this dead technology years ago, with all the time and
money we've collectively wasted we could have
On 08/17/2012 04:58 AM, Steve Underwood wrote:
On 08/17/2012 06:08 AM, Eric Wieling wrote:
Has anyone experimented with increasing the DAHDI chunk size in
improve fax reliability? If so, did it help, hurt, or not make any
difference?
I haven't found issues related to the DAHDI chunk size.
On 07/23/2012 09:23 AM, motty.cruz wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying get fax working over VOIP lines. I'm running Asterisk 1.8.12
server, working fine, however I would like to get rid of our anolog fax
lines and integrate with our fax to our Asterisk Server.
Any recomendataion from this list? I had done
On 07/01/2012 01:46 AM, Petros Moisiadis wrote:
Hello,
On http://pastebin.com/AP5GBWUR you may see an excerpt from asterisk
full log that includes a failing fax sending session. As you can see in
line 328, the transmission fails with error Received bad response to
DCS or training. It seems that
On 06/07/2012 06:18 AM, Daniel Seagraves wrote:
On Jun 6, 2012, at 10:47 PM, Lee Howard wrote:
Unless you're going to move to an internet fax service provider you'll
probably not want to attempt to switch your fax line to a VoIP line and still
attempt to fax over it. And even
On 06/06/2012 12:40 PM, Daniel Seagraves wrote:
The boss wants to move from landline service to VOIP service as a cost-cutting
measure. We have one voice line and one fax line. The telco is billing over
$100 a month for the two. We're using Hylafax for faxing and a PBX for the
voice line.
On 05/18/2012 04:45 AM, Sebastian Gutierrez wrote:
with FFA I may get 70% of faxes ok.
Nobody that I work with would consider that acceptable.
Lee.
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
On 05/17/2012 07:40 AM, gincantalupo wrote:
That could seem counter-intuitive but it is not. Not to mention the
fact that information technology is not science, the solution to
broken faxes is to lower down speed.
The DSP algorithms change slightly between bitrates and considerably
between
On 05/17/2012 07:53 AM, Andrew Furey wrote:
we use ActiveFax for sending (interfaced from an ERP package) and
often get Comm Error 283 and incomplete faxes. If it's just making a
bad situation worse, how is it that our solution of turning off ECM
mode fixes it 98% of the time? I'm curious.
On 05/03/2012 01:28 PM, Bruce B wrote:
I want to send out 1000 faxes. I have an excel sheet of numbers and I
have Asterisk 1.8 installed from repository. I don't want to use a fax
machine or any ATAs or analogue equipment. How would Asterisk help me
with faxing these? and what add-ons do I
me?
thanks
--
From: Lee Howard fax...@howardsilvan.com
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 6:29 PM
To: ales...@asistar.it
Cc: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] problems
kirsten du toit wrote:
You should try disabling ecm..
This seems crazy to me. Why are you recommending it?
Lee.
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live
Steve Underwood wrote:
On 09/01/2011 11:50 PM, Lee Howard wrote:
kirsten du toit wrote:
You should try disabling ecm..
This seems crazy to me. Why are you recommending it?
Because its the industry standard last resort of anyone who doesn't
understand FAX and is using T.38.
Even HP
Alessio wrote:
I have 2 computers in the lan, one is the Asterisk PBX and the other
is the server with hylafax and iaxmodem installed.
.
Sep 1 16:50:11 FAXServer FaxGetty[6225]: -- [4:RING]
Sep 1 16:50:11 FAXServer FaxGetty[6225]: ANSWER: Call ID 1 06654321
Sep 1 16:50:11 FAXServer
Ryan McGuire wrote:
Unless your network is under load and you are seeing dropped packets
and high jitter, I would absolutely not do T.38. The cheapest and
easiest approach that I have found is to buy yourself an FXS gateway
and just make sure you are using ulaw.
As SIP is usually running over
Steve Totaro wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Lee Howard fax...@howardsilvan.com wrote:
Ryan McGuire wrote:
Unless your network is under load and you are seeing dropped packets
and high jitter, I would absolutely not do T.38. The cheapest and
easiest approach that I have found
Here are a few guidelines that I think may serve you well...
Firstly, every network port that is being listened-to on any
publicly-reachable system MUST be carefully protected - typically by
firewalling. So, for example, you're likely going to want to block SSH
from all but certain IPs. In
David Backeberg wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:00 PM, A J Stiles
asterisk_l...@earthshod.co.uk wrote:
(For my part, I'm actually surprised that nobody came up with a proper
protocol for encapsulating the stream of zeros and ones that make up a fax
transmission but rely on the precise
Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
I don't think I have a prayer of hacking iaxmodem to do what is
needed to emulate a modem though :)
I can't pretend to know what an alarm system needs out of a modem, but
as far as iaxmodem acquiring data-modem capabilities that part is
already developing. IAXmodem
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
On 05/04/2010 06:30 AM, Miguel Amez wrote:
I'm experiencing the same problem with t38modem and hylafax.
My problem is that on the re-Invite phase it syncs lower than 2400 bpps
and the connection hangs on the second page.
The patch I'm talking about won't
Mike Diehl wrote:
I could probably get hylafax configured, but I'm not sure how reliable it is.
If it is considered reliable, would someone let me know?
It's reliable as long as you're not using FoIP (i.e. as long as you're
faxing with PSTN lines).
Thanks,
Lee.
--
Kingsley Tart wrote:
DEBUG[18902] chan_dahdi.c: Detected digit 'f'
This happens just after the initial fax negotiation has started and
seems to correspond with the sending fax machine giving up.
Turn off fax detection.
Thanks,
Lee.
--
Kingsley Tart wrote:
Jan 14 12:44:49.39: [ 3403]: -- [9:AT+FRH=3\r]
Jan 14 12:44:56.39: [ 3403]: -- [0:]
Jan 14 12:44:56.39: [ 3403]: MODEM Empty line
Jan 14 12:44:56.39: [ 3403]: MODEM TIMEOUT: waiting for v.21 carrier
Jan 14 12:44:56.39: [ 3403]: -- data [1]
Jan 14 12:44:56.39: [ 3403]: --
Miguel Molina wrote:
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but AFAIK spandsp based fax
applications for asterisk only support a maximum of 9600bps.
No. V.17 (speeds up to 14400 bps) are supported.
Thanks,
Lee.
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided
In your sip.conf file allowguest defaults to yes. This means that
anyone that can reach the SIP ports on that system has access to make
unauthenticated calls, by default. The administrator actually has to go
in and turn it off to prevent unauthenticated SIP calls (in whatever
context
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Thursday 12 November 2009 07:47:34 Lee Howard wrote:
In your sip.conf file allowguest defaults to yes. This means that
anyone that can reach the SIP ports on that system has access to make
unauthenticated calls, by default. The administrator actually has to go
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Thursday 12 November 2009 09:53:17 Lee Howard wrote:
These people should need to deliberately use allowguest=yes. I would
venture to guess that these people already know who they are and
deliberately have this set. I would venture to guess that there are
far, far
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
The issue in question was suspended, while the reporter makes the case on the
Asterisk-dev mailing list, which is not this list. The opinions there
amongst
contributors (meritocracy, not democracy) are that keeping the sample
configuration as it is now is probably
Danny Nicholas wrote:
Gentlemens clubs usually don't have any. While LH probably has a valid
point, jumping on Til isn't the way to bring it home. You can't protect the
stupid or lazy from themselves. If you can't do this right, pay someone
else to.
You're suggesting that if I pay someone
Michiel van Baak wrote:
When I started working with asterisk, and found my first issue, I
created a patch, put it on the tracker, followed up on the comments, and
stuff got in.
I'm sincerely pleased to know that you've had a different experience
than have I.
If you read the page about
Michael Wyres wrote:
The way I see it, the reason you have encountered some resistance to your
opinion in regards to whether guest access should be allowed by default or
should not be, is not because your opinion is right or wrong - everyone
is entitled to an opinion - and your stance has
I've heard of people who go to casinos and come home with a couple
thousand bucks winnings, too. But the truth is that invariably the vast
majority of people who gamble don't win.
http://hylafax.sourceforge.net/docs/fax-over-voip.pdf
Everyone wants to see if they're lucky. The smart ones,
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Lee Howard wrote:
I've heard of people who go to casinos and come home with a couple
thousand bucks winnings, too. But the truth is that invariably the vast
majority of people who gamble don't win.
http://hylafax.sourceforge.net/docs/fax-over-voip.pdf
Jason Aarons (US) wrote:
Anyone have a customer sending/receiving multi-page faxes over Verizon
Business SIP trunk/g711 ?
Verizon Business indicates they don’t support it, and I have 2 recent
customers that it doesn’t work for, and 1 current large customer
telling me he’s going to make
Gordon Henderson wrote:
Not FAX over VoIP, but testing 2 FAX machines back to back ...
The scenario is that a client has one of my asterisk VoIP only systems
which they're happy with, but need to test FAX machines, so rather than
plug in a TDM card with FXS ports, I'm suggesting something
Johann Steinwendtner wrote:
Lee Howard schrieb:
fred wrote:
That’s being said, before going through the T38 Gateway tests, I’ve
tried first the Fax2mail and Mail2fax solution with (Hylafax +
Iaxmodem + Asterisk), to make a well-tested Asterisk solution working
and I’m already
fred wrote:
That’s being said, before going through the T38 Gateway tests, I’ve
tried first the Fax2mail and Mail2fax solution with (Hylafax +
Iaxmodem + Asterisk), to make a well-tested Asterisk solution working
and I’m already facing some problems. Receiving faxes is ok but
sending
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
What's the use case for the Digium
driver? Am I missing something by not using it?
While they accomplish the same goal, the commercial driver is based upon
a different codebase,
Ok.
provides support for patented fax protocols,
Really? V.34-fax (33,600 bps) is
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Sunday 07 June 2009 19:39:50 Lee Howard wrote:
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
What's the use case for the Digium
driver? Am I missing something by not using it?
While they accomplish the same goal, the commercial driver is based upon
a different codebase
Todd S wrote:
Our call path is Sip trunk from MAX TNT - Asterisk - T1 - Adtran
endpoint converting sip trunk to copper line for house wiring.
Users at the endpoint can receive faxes without a problem. However,
sending faxes are not so friendly. 1 out of 5 faxes will send
Michael wrote:
Anyway this is a great example of why MICROSOFT is worth billions, and Linux
has to be given away. Not because Microsoft is L33T but because the majority
of the stuff sold for Windows works out of the box.
For what it's worth, their fax software doesn't work very well out of
Michael wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 03:40:12 you wrote:
Slightly off topic, but M$ is worth billions because they started in 1976
or so, became the de facto standard, and were pretty cutthroat in the way
they do business. They have a profit motive and have always taken the path
that makes
D Tucny wrote:
2009/4/22 Michael mich...@networkstuff.co.nz
mailto:mich...@networkstuff.co.nz
I use GPL Ghostscript 8.6.2 to produce the TIFF files for faxing.
Does anyone know of a way, either while producing the file, or
after, to tell
how many pages have been produced?
Marco wrote:
I've IAXModem and asterisk Asterisk 1.4.24 running on the same machine.
They are linked together through localhost. I've turned qualify on for the
iax peer. Periodically I've this message:
[Apr 20 23:47:46] NOTICE[4641]: chan_iax2.c:9049 __iax2_poke_noanswer:
Peer 'iaxfax' is
Steve Underwood wrote:
I wonder how much demand there is for colour FAXing.
It's quite niche. When it's available people will have their fun with
it for a few times, and after the novelty quickly wears off they never
use it again.
I have quietly enabled color receiving support on high-volume
Marshall Henderson wrote:
However, when a fax is complete on
that modem and another call comes into it, the modem is still in a
state of 'settling down' from the last call and I'd like to have it
ring a different channel if possible.
iaxmodem stays busy for 5 seconds after going on-hook and
David Backeberg wrote:
It may be possible to use hylafax, but
I don't know how or why you would.
The reason *why* is generally due to support issues.
For one, HylaFAX probably has a better T.30 implementation in its Class
1 driver than does app_fax. At least that historically has been true.
Steve Underwood wrote:
Lee Howard wrote:
David Backeberg wrote:
It may be possible to use hylafax, but
I don't know how or why you would.
The reason *why* is generally due to support issues.
For one, HylaFAX probably has a better T.30 implementation in its Class
Hi Steve,
Steve Underwood wrote:
In chan_dahdi.c there is now code that extends the buffering inside
dadhi when a FAX is detected, and puts the buffering back to normal at
the end. This isn't really a cure - its more of a bandaid. However, I
expect it has the desired effect if they have
Steve Underwood wrote:
Hi Lee,
Lee Howard wrote:
Hi Steve,
Steve Underwood wrote:
In chan_dahdi.c there is now code that extends the buffering inside
dadhi when a FAX is detected, and puts the buffering back to normal
at the end. This isn't really a cure - its more of a bandaid
Steve Totaro wrote:
IAX2 has been a lemon since it's inception. Sure, some people have
success. It seems to work OK for IAXModem.
I chose to use IAX2 in developing IAXmodem because IAX2 is relatively
simple compared to SIP and because at the time I didn't know of any
easy-to-use SIP
Marco Signorini wrote:
Analyzing your answers, seems that fax handling is still today
problematic with IAXModem and Hylafax... or I'm wrong?
A single server that I administer, receiving 12,000 pages and sending
1,000 pages daily would seem to contradict your conclusions.
Thanks,
Lee.
stoffell wrote:
I wanted to switch from my current setup (mISDN) to the native dahdi
with b410p support (wcb4xp). All works fine for normal phone calls but
not for faxing. Faxes are distorted, if arriving at all, and hylafax
logs the usual bad stuff (HDLC frame not byte-oriented.)
Make
James Lamanna wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use iaxmodem against a very old version of asterisk
(1.0.7 - its a debian sarge embedded system),
yet when asterisk gets a call from iaxmodem, it says that the format
for the call is unknown.
Does anyone know if there is a minimum version of asterisk
voip crazy wrote:
This calls arrive the asterisk box, asterisk detect that this calls
are fax, asterisk answer the call, and then Hangup the call. But
hylafax do not receive nothing.
What does the CLI say about this call?
Thanks,
Lee.
___
--
Matt Watson wrote:
I'd probably be a little pissed if I were Steve Underwood if somebody
pocketed over 10k $USD for taking credit for a product that my free library
did the bulk of the work for.
I can't speak for Steve at all, but any major contributor to an
open-source project faces this, so
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 08:02:24AM -0500, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
One of the most frequent security issues comes not in the form of a
software flaw, but simply in people choosing easy-to-guess passwords
on the root account. There are two suggestions I have to reduce
Benny Amorsen wrote:
Now, what's the story on Hylafax+? How is that different from Hylafax?
See:
http://hylafax.sourceforge.net/about.php
Thanks,
Lee.
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing
Gordon Henderson wrote:
Something that's always confused me - IAXmodem is built on spandsp. RxFAX
is also built on spandsp. RxFAX gets one step closer to the data stream
(no copper/IP in the way), so why are people using ( suggesting) Hylafax
over RxFAX?
spandsp includes a lot of
Sanjay Rajdev wrote:
We are using Asterisk 1.4.13 on FC6 and have a T1 card with 20 DID's.
We are wanting to use one of the DID's for Fax, is this possible or do
we have to add some addition Hardware and what is the best way to do this.
http://iaxmodem.sourceforge.net
Thanks,
Lee.
Steve Totaro wrote:
You may need an additional
server just to handle faxes if you are running many instances as they
are CPU intensive.
iaxmodem is not CPU intensive. 100 of them aren't. You can put that
many on a typical modern machine and have them all faxing simultaneously
and not see a
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
It turns out their SIP provider doesn't support the T.38 protocol for faxing.
Their statement is if you really need it, use ulaw and AstraFax? I don't
understand
how AstraFax makes a difference in the process?
It doesn't make a difference. uLaw over SIP/UDP still
Benny Amorsen wrote:
Lee Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Note that if you have a fax machine that performs some variant of T.37
(fax-over-email) and you have an on-line service provider that is
willing to work with you... then you can rather easily get your fax
machine faxing through
Andreas van dem Helge wrote:
Cisco gateway with T.38 support. That's the only real way to do faxing
through asterisk.
Although this statement has marginally more truth to it given the
SIP-only context that the original poster provided, it is still
substantially inaccurate.
There are several
James Finstrom wrote:
elastix
*shivers*
Lee.
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
mark morreny wrote:
I am simulating the sending of fax using sendfax through voip
Ooops. Please see:
http://hylafax.sourceforge.net/docs/fax-over-voip.pdf
Thanks,
Lee.
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
Louwrens Benadé wrote:
NDID=s
What the hell!? Why is 'NDID=s'?
Probably because at the point when your dialplan sends the call to
iaxmodem ${EXTEN} is s.
Thanks,
Lee.
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
Joshua Kinard wrote:
So I'm trying to work on this complex fax server setup, and part of it
involves connecting my asterisk server to my Rolm CBX switch, via a T1 line.
I plan on using Asterisk simply as a T1-PRI Bridge to IAXmodem (which in
turn, activates HylaFax+ to handle the faxing).
Joshua Kinard wrote:
Another attached text file shows what iaxmodem is doing during all of this.
Something about adjusting skew.
[2008-02-15 17:11:12] Adjusting skew to -50.
[2008-02-15 17:11:12] Adjusting skew to -100.
[2008-02-15 17:11:12] Adjusting skew to -150.
[2008-02-15
Jonn R Taylor wrote:
One of the things that I found is you need to add nojitterbuffer to the
iaxmodem config file
The reason that you need the nojitterbuffer in the iaxmodem config file
is because you're actually getting at least some jitter.
IAXmodem's jitterbuffer simply fills-in gaps due
Al lists wrote:
what method is preferred:
haylafax and Iaxmodem or spnadsp for faxing.
I think that you mean to say HylaFAX and IAXmodem or txfax/rxfax ...
because spandsp is but a DSP/DCE library, and it cannot work alone, and
iaxmodem uses spandsp.
Thanks,
Lee.
Giedrius Augys wrote:
I have problems with asterisk and hylafax+ iaxmodem. I can
successfully send faxes to Panasonic KX-FT932 fax, but with Xerox
WorkCentre M20i I have problems: No carrier. This is hylafax log,
maybe you can suggest me where to find ...
Oct 17 07:38:48.22: [22428]:
Matthew Fredrickson wrote:
Not to ignite any fires, but I don't think I've *ever* knowingly
received a patch to libpri or chan_zap from them. And I've fixed a few
protocol related bugs in libpri for people with Sangoma cards. It'd be
nice if they at the very least supported the protocol
Joe Acquisto wrote:
As I understand it, I must have faxdetect = incoming to enable detection of
the fax tone.
Then, I must have a [fax] context to pickup the line and send it to whatever
extension the FAX device is on.
It's a fax extension in the context where the call is at... not a fax
Christian Peter wrote:
Can anybody help me with this issue. Please no switch to Hylafax
mails, because I'm very happy with SpanDSP, it integrates nicely and
works most time.
*chuckle*
Lee.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
Thomas Kenyon wrote:
The weird thing is, looking at the motherboard manual for my test
machine, The lower the Interrupt does not neccesarily mean the higher
the priority. Eg. 8 to 15 have a higher priority than 3 to 7.
Correct. IRQ 2 bridges to IRQ 8. Thus the priority order is:
0, 1, 2,
Thomas Kenyon wrote:
My zttest results weren't quite as bad as the previous poster.
Home Machine.
--- Results after 113 passes ---
Best: 100.00 -- Worst: 99.987793 -- Average: 99.994452
This should be perfectly fine.
Work Machine.
--- Results after 115 passes ---
Best: 100.00 --
Faris Raouf wrote:
The problem is that when I run faxstat, it does not show hylafax connected
to any tty.
You're probably not running faxgetty (and your later comments below
confirm this...)
And when I try to run faxaddmodem (just to see what might happen) and select
ttyIAX, I get an error
The site lists openh323.org, but that's the old t38modem I think. The
new one should be coming out here sometime:
http://www.voxgratia.org/downloads.html
However, right now I think that the SIP-compatible version is only in CVS:
cvs -z9 -d
:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/openh323 co
marek cervenka wrote:
hi,
i have problem with pass-through faxing
with this scenario
hylafax(iaxmodem) - iax - asterisk1 1.2.22 - sip - asterisk2 1.2.X(xen
virtual) - linksys ATA
i can fax to fax2mail on hylafax
but after upgrade asterisk2 to 1.4 faxing is not working
hylafax(iaxmodem) - iax
Michael Rice wrote:
Hello.
We are running Asterisk 1.2.23 iaxmodem-0.2.1 and hylafax-4.3.3
When we send faxes the people who receive the faxes complain that they
look wrinkled or smashed up. Sometimes they are missing random lines.
Has anyone seen this happen, or know how to fix it?
Well,
http://www.asterisk.org/node/48327
I mean, really... you're kidding me, right?
Lee.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
I was wondering if there is any plan to support fully faxing in
Asterisk, I.E.: A T38 Gateway of sorts.
You can use Asterisk 1.4's T.38 pass-through support in combination with
the new OPAL-using t38modem (currently CVS) which now supports SIP (and
not just H.323) to
Andrew Nowrot wrote:
I am trying to build reliable fax solution with asterisk, iaxmodem and
hylafax. I am attempting to do this on Compaq DL-360 with 2 pentium 3
1.2 GHz (512 cache) and 2GB of RAM. I am using a Sangoma A101. After
installing the newest zaptel and wanpipe-3.1.0 beta I did
Don Kelly wrote:
I've tried timing faxes two ways:
From a fax machine on a station port of an AltiGen PC/PBX served by an MCI
PRI calling back into the same PRI and reaching a RightFax server on a
station port behind the AltiGen.
From the same fax machine on the same station port of the AltiGen
Steve Totaro wrote:
Please qualify your usage. A couple faxes a day, a couple hundred, a
couple thousand, or a couple hundred thousand?
Couple hundred thousand per month - at least on one installation.
Are you running asterisk and hylafax on the same machine? What is
your TDM
Gordon Henderson wrote:
The downside of iaxmodem is that (to my knowledge) you can't easilly
implement an auto-answer/detect fax/voice/ auto attendant/voicemail
system. The channel must be dedicated to faxing, and that's that. This
may or may not be an issue for you though.
If you needed
Luki wrote:
So essentially you need a pool of iaxmodems running on different
ports, and then Dial() them until you find one that accepts your call.
Or did I get that wrong? That seems really like a drawback to me
The biggest drawback with
app_rxfax is that if it crashes for whatever reason
Luki wrote:
So you are saying a pool if iaxmodems and a loop through Dial() to
find an open one is the way to go?
Yes. You could launch iaxmodems on-demand - as well as the
corresponding faxgetty and wait for the initialization to finish - but
it is better to just have a bunch of modems
And 10,545 downloads in 33 releases. Crazy people!
nik600 wrote:
its in a beta state with only one member... is it a stable project?
thanks
On 4/23/07, Lee Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nik600 wrote:
i have a PRI connected to a TE205P.
Actually, can i send and receive FAX through
, where the most important Voip
problems are minimized...
thanks
On 4/23/07, Lee Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And 10,545 downloads in 33 releases. Crazy people!
nik600 wrote:
its in a beta state with only one member... is it a stable project?
thanks
nik600 wrote:
i have a PRI connected to a TE205P.
Actually, can i send and receive FAX through Asterisk using stable
solutions?
Or shall i connect an ATA to Asterisk and then a modem with Hylafax?
I would suggest that using IAXmodem with HylaFAX would be more stable
than using an
Wiley Siler wrote:
Can anyone recommend software that will allow me to utilize my VoIP
provider and send fax over IP?
No, but I can recommend that you read this to see why you shouldn't bother:
http://hylafax.sourceforge.net/docs/fax-over-voip.pdf
Lee.
Wiley Siler wrote:
Basically, I want to send bulk faxes to a list of my clients.
It is time consuming for a person to individually fax so a blast type
solution seems best.
Over IP is of course to save money...
Thanks for the link, reading now...
Any suggestions for the blast then?
My
Joe Acquisto wrote:
AFAIK, the FAX targets are normal FAX machines, on the PSTN.
What happens is, there appears to be a dial out, and a FAX negotiation, but it
always fails.
What does zttest say about your zap card configuration/installation? If
it's not always 99.98% or better then it's
Joe Acquisto wrote:
Lee Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wrote: 4/6/2007 2:15 PM:
Joe Acquisto wrote:
AFAIK, the FAX targets are normal FAX machines, on the PSTN.
What happens is, there appears to be a dial out, and a FAX negotiation, but
What it always fails.
What does zttest say
LKS GMAIL wrote:
Does anybody know how to receive send faxes throw mISDN? It's almost
impossible!
I know that IAXmodem users are doing it. They have to get the right
version of the mISDN stuff, though, I think.
Lee.
___
--Bandwidth and
younss azzayani wrote:
and this is the /var/spool/hylafax/log/c1:
http://pastebin.ca/403282
cat /var/spool/hylafax/log/c3 ::
http://pastebin.ca/403291
What does zttest say? If it's below 99.98% then hardware configuration
is where the problem is.
Lee.
1 - 100 of 318 matches
Mail list logo
