think you should understand that 802.11s will not scale.
So really use it just for small parts of the network, you then combine
with L3 routing protocol together.
Mitar
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Valent Turkovic
<val...@otvorenamreza.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 6:20 PM
the 7 second range or is
> that an artifact of something else?
I do not know. Maybe it is an artifact of flapping route?
Valent?
Also, ping is from a central location, so this is accumulative over
multiple hops.
Mitar
--
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https:
Foneras. When you
have a lot of fiber you tend to like using it all, if you can. :-)
Mitar
--
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_m
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
my knowledge for multicast you should use ETX = 1 /
d_f (as described in the
High-Throughput Multicast Routing Metrics in Wireless Mesh Networks paper).
So we know ETX equations for both unicast and multicast. Maybe Babel
should support both?
Mitar
--
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_
t work on the wired links as well
as on WiFi?
Mitar
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek
<j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote:
>> BTW, how should VPN links be handled in this case? They are currently
>> marked as wired, but they can also experience packet loss. Does t
Hi!
But it will be more complicated with upgrades, and more complicated
assuring that things are really the same (same patched version of
Babel, same kernel version, TCP/IP stack, sysctl settings, etc.).
Mitar
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek
<j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot
l
> addresses to only those which are actually used by babeld. Because
> currently I just have to report them all (I could cross-reference that
> with interfaces in babeld configuration, but I think this would be too
> much added complexity, so I just report all of them).
Was this addresse
it is not really production grade?
We had to turn of Babel in the network and go back to OLSRv1. So much
for smooth transition.
Mitar
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Jernej Kos <jer...@kos.mx> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On 11. 12. 2015 18:47, Matthieu Boutier wrote:
>> Did you know wh
Hi!
https://github.com/jech/babeld/blob/master/CHANGES is not updated?
Is default route in a special routing table patch in?
Mitar
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek
<j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Babeld-1.6.3 is available
Hi!
Any progress on this? I know that not yet many days have passed, but
it is pretty urgent for us, because the network grew to the stage
where OLSR routing is unstable so we would need to switch to Babel as
soon as possible.
Mitar
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Jernej Kos <jer...@kos
Hi!
I think that putting routes of both routing protocols in the same
table gets really messy and hard to debug. And prevents any policy
routing rules we might want to apply.
Mitar
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek
j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr wrote:
Then we can have
Mitar
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Jernej Kos jer...@kos.mx wrote:
Hello!
Is it possible to specify the routing table of exported routes in
babeld? So for example that the default route would be put into a
separate routing table from the other exported routes?
Jernej
interface you want to run
on the same channel, and for client interface you want to run on
different channels.
Mitar
--
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_m
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
Hi!
In the future we may implement roaming support which will let people keep
their IP as they move around the city, but it will still switch after e.g.
10 minutes, so tracking people becomes much harder.
What are ideas to implement roaming on L3?
Mitar
--
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https
this multi-channel roaming-enabled pockets of the network?
Mitar
--
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_m
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel
system selects the channel so that the link is possible. This
second approach has a benefit that also backbone connections could be
done through the same system.
Mitar
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek
j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr wrote:
Your understanding is correct
1500 MTU. No?
Mitar
--
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_m
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
it benefits society, in the
monitoring of various infrastructures
in a secure fashion within reason.
Am I smelling security through obscurity here? Securing the code
should never be the way for securing the system. If you are doing
this, then you just add a false *sense* of security.
Mitar
the code without he getting anything
from that. He really found that rude. Not paying him? How they dare!
Mitar
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
will be
created dynamically, so we will have to setup Babel to work on top of
that as tunnels are created and removed. Can Babel handle this?
Mitar
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin
, this IP is also announced on node
A with /32 announce and once it moves to B, B starts announcing it.
Sorry if my terminology is not correct. I am not a network guy. But I
hope you will still understand what I asking. Or educate me what is
proper terminology. Thanks.
Mitar
Hi!
Juliusz thank you for your explanations. Now I think I understand a bit more.
OK, so such daemon which would allow roaming in combination with Babel
in the sense I am hoping for does not yet exist. Do you maybe know if
there is already some project hoping to implement that?
Mitar
On Thu
write it immediately. We are still
evaluating possibilities. :-)
Mitar
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
probably use the same schema internally in your control panel
in a distributed way so that maybe some centralized system in your
network could still fetch this data and use it (for example to draw a
map or something).
Mitar
___
Babel-users mailing list
Hi!
and our control panel application
What do you use for your control panel application?
can pseudo-randomly choose RFC-1918 IP addresses for mesh interfaces
if the user selects it.
You do know birthday paradox? ;-)
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Birthday_problem
Mitar
be enough.
In IPv4 is problem, that if you will take big address space you will
have problems peering with other mesh networks. If this will be one day
interesting to you. (At least in Europe we are slowly trying to connect
all networks together.)
Mitar
Hi!
Port 6697. Looks like IRC. ;-)
Mitar
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
about paths to other nodes.
Mitar
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
C. And
when A runs its run and the shortest path between B and C is already
found/calculated and it is not recalculated again (what would be if
you would say that runs are independent). No?
Mitar
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users
.
Thanks for all the answers.
Mitar
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
information about
how is best for other nodes to send it packets. But this is not really
useful. I would need information in other direction.
Mitar
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman
with
moving.
To stir things even more: why not Mercurial? ;-)
Mitar
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
understand correctly you are inviting me to /tmp/lab? Uh, I am
from Slovenia, so this would require some traveling I do not believe
by budget allows me. Sadly. I would be glad to visit you.
Mitar
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Gioacchino Mazzurco
gmazzurc...@gmail.com wrote:
there is some plan to implement multicast routing on babel
in short terms?
+1
Mitar
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
Hi!
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek j...@pps.jussieu.fr
wrote:
Juliusz Chroboczek. /The Babel routing protocol/. To appear as
RFC 6126. 2011.
Hm, will try to convert that into bibtex.
Mitar
___
Babel-users mailing list
Hi!
How can I cite Babel in my thesis? Is there an article or at least
(published) whitepaper I could cite?
Mitar
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
.
Mitar
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
Hi!
Do you know how does Babel compare to Predictive Wireless Routing
Protocol (PWRP)?
http://www.tropos.com/technology/scalability.html
Mitar
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman
be an interesting social routing approach. Useful
for some 1 April RFC. ;-)
Mitar
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
a Parisian dialect. ;-)
Mitar
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
that a good hash function
based on MAC which would produce this temporary IP address would have
a collision in this short time-span (while two nodes are trying to get
their IP) is slim, isn't it? Once it gets a real IP it would just
start using the same link-local IP address as others.
Mitar
-local addresses in IPv4? The we-all-know-and-love
169.254.* addresses?
Mitar
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
be fine.
But we would also like to support 2.0 versions. So is there no way
it would work on just IPv4 or was this just something nobody cared for
so there is no implementation for it?
Mitar
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users
connecting
that the node you are connecting is really yours and not MiM node
trying to get your password?
Mitar
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
Hi!
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Gabriel Kerneis kern...@pps.jussieu.fr wrote:
Choose one of your stations to act as an ahcpd server.
What happens if there is a network split?
Mitar
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users
(necessary to survive a network split).
OK. But what is then difference with running a dnsmasq on every node
with DHCP where every node has its own IPv4 pool for clients? dnsmasq
does not yet support IPv6 but is this then the only difference?
Mitar
___
Babel
only one path which is the best for both
directions.
Is there some reason why would be prefer in our networks paths which
are the same for both directions?
Mitar
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
the routing protocol and auto-configure
itself and starts using it.
Mitar
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
routes? Does it support asymmetric links?
As I understand currently it is possible to define your own ETX
metrics but I do not see a clear way of adding bandwidth information
to ETX without also changing the way (not just shortest path) routes
are calculated.
Mitar
49 matches
Mail list logo
