According to the genealogy of bahai-library, I SUPPOSE Krishna and Buddha possibly descent from Japheth (Aryan people) son of Noah. And Zoroaster, from Keturah Jokshan DedanPatti Goebel [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribi:
Interesting question. I guess Keturah's children might get little
mention because it doesn't seem like promises are associated with them
in the same way.
Also, I've heard that in some rabbinic commentaries Keturah actually
*is* Hagar. Basically the idea is that Hagar was a concubine when she
had
Does that need to be understood literally? I think the common Baha'i
belief that Zoroaster, Buddha and Krishna are from the seed of Abraham
is probably a myth.
warmest, Susan
Susan,
With so much focus on Issac and Ishmael many people sometimes forget (or
never hear about) the other children of
If the Manifestation can convince so wicked and spiritually blind a man as
the Sultan in ten minutes; surely the next Manifestation will be able to
prove His or Her mission to the House of Justice.
Brent,
If, as some might interpret it to, the Tablet of the Holy Mariner, at
least on one level,
Dear Susan, I said I don't know. But this quotes says "Prophets":'Abdu'l-Bah, in one of His Tablets, has given to, and the emphasis He has placed upon, the hereditary principle and the law of primogeniture as having been upheld by the Prophets of the past (Shoghi Effendi, The World
Dear Hasan,I was speaking of the Manifestation to come. Will there be false claimants? There might be. If a claimant comes to light who bases his claim solely upon a genealogy then I would refrain from following him unless I was convinced his words proved his station. The best proof of the
I showed you evidence for my claims about your beliefs which was also
another option which you offered.
Gilberto,
I specifically asked you to show me where *I* said anything like that
about the Jews. You did not do so.
But in addition I also made a
statement which constituted an apology.
I sent it again, my message ddidn't arriveI give less positivism and more credit to traditions and genetic lines, Shoghi Effendi and Nabil liked to draw Holy trees on religion and monarchs trees, explaining much times meanings within (the Bible contains a lot).Personally, I like to
I am not trying to upset you. I am not joking. Think of it
this way: In the future someone appears CLAIMING to be the next
Manifestation and produces a family tree showing he is descended
from Baha`u'llah.
Dear Scott,
A family tree showing he is a descendent from Baha'u'llah would
Dear Gilberto,
Khazeh persuaded me to rethink my position and accept what you felt to
be an apology.
You're welcome to stay.
Susan
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto (e-mail)
is sent by the Johnson County Community College (JCCC) and is intended to
I see your point and agree, but would point out that we have accepted Shoghi Effendi before we read his family tree. In the future when a false claimant might arise, why should we accept his "genealogy as "true", when it could have been forged?Its just a document, and we all know documents can
Well, I think it would be neutral in effect. We do not, after all, believe in original sin. I think we will see any number of descendants of covenant breakers come to the faith over the next centuries. Is their forebear's sin there's as well?Regards, Scott[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am not
I don't know Scott I suppose next Prophet will be from Bah'u'llh's line, but nothing is written so far I think.Scott Saylors [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribi:I see your point and agree, but would point out that we have accepted Shoghi Effendi before we read his family tree. In the future
We don't have any basis of decision other than the spiritual decision when it comes down to it. We made the decision to follow Baha`u'llah because our spirit recognized Him, in the future that wil be the answer for anyone else as well.Regards, ScottHasan Elias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see your point and agree, but would point out that we have
accepted Shoghi Effendi before we read his family tree. In the
future when a false claimant might arise, why should we accept his
genealogy as true, when it could have been forged?
Where does Baha'u'llah indicate that acceptance
Well, I think it would be neutral in effect. We do not, after all,
believe in original sin.
If that's the case then what difference should it make if the next
Manifestation descends from Baha'u'llah or not?
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto (e-mail)
It doesn't, Susan. We will be faced with the same choice that we all had - the reliance on our own rational soul to choose the truth and follow it.Regards, Scott[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see your point and agree, but would point out that we have accepted Shoghi Effendi before we read his
Susan,I don't think it is necessary at all. I think He will be descended from Abraham, but then I am probably descended from Abraham and you too, as you have pointed out. A geneaology is no proof at all - the only proof could be spiritual, the only means of decision would be on perceived
Scott, you may know 'Abdu'l-Bah mentioned four ways to get the truth (senses, reason, traditions, inspiration or faith), but He says the only "infallible" way is through the Holy Ghost. I know most of them are subjective, but...You wrote: "A geneaology is no proof at all"That
"That was a special indication (among others) from Siyyid Kazim Rashti to
recognize the Qaim remember?"
Dear Hasan,
Indeed I do. But that was the Manifestation before this One. We are talking about She who is to come.
"Just curious: Do you thinkImanate is not "a proof at all"
In the letter David Bowie sent, the House call next Prophet "Him", but I don't know "He" is generic. [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribi: But that was the Manifestation before this One. We are talking about She who is to come.
The information contained in this e-mail and any
I don't know, really. But, I wonder if a no-descendant could attain that "hereditary principle" which sustains the law of God as the Master said.Susan, why a man or woman has to be shamed because of their ancestry of covenant-breaking? Why not (if he/she is a good person) to be
I'm talking about the proof that Imams are descendants of the
Prophet,
because they claimed authority and you know they were, indeed,
the legitimate
successors of Muhammad. Nobody never confirm scientifically
ADN's chains.
Dear Hasan,
Ali was an Imam even though he was not a
?
In the letter David Bowie sent, the House call next Prophet Him,
but I don't know He is generic.
Dear Hasan,
Yes, the House consistently uses the male form for the generic when it
writes in English. Persian, however, has no gender.
warmest, Susan
The information contained in
I don't know, really. But, I wonder if a no-descendant could
attain that
hereditary principle which sustains the law of God as the
Master said.
How about Ali and Peter?
Susan, why a man or woman has to be shamed because of their
ancestry of
covenant-breaking? Why not (if
I don't know, really. But, I wonder if a no-descendant could attain that "hereditary principle" which "sustains the law of God" as the Master said.This whole heredity issue becomes irrelevant after a few hundred years because, as others have said, everyone is related to everyone
the Covenant was also crystal clear about a continuing line of Guardians, so I don't think that really addresses Hasan's question about badaa. The Will and Testament is clear about how future Guardians were to be chosen, but that document does not guarantee that there will always be a
I am curious about the purpose of discussing this topic, given that none of us will be around in 900 years to see what happens.If in a discussion, someone raises the possibility that the House of Justice might lose its infallibility after the thousand years have passed, how does that
Tim Nolan [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribi:I am curious about the purpose of discussing this topic, given that none of us will be around in 900 years to see what happens. Hi Tim,To talk about Four and Seven Valleys, doesnt actually means that any of us could reach the last valleys? (At
Sunday, January 29, 2006, 11 Sultán 162 BE
In 1997 a friend of mine wrote to the House of
Justice about the recognition (or not) of the
next Manifestation. He received this reply.
David
MESSAGE:
The Universal House of Justice has received your
email message of 24 May 1997 inquiring
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or peharps 1511 or 2001. ;-}///Hey Susan, good point, most of Shaykhs and Azalis (about Ghiyath 1511) confine the interpret!
ation of
their respective messianic prophecies into intrinsic numerological tricks to reject the Bb and Bahullh respectively. A
I am curious about the purpose of discussing this topic, given
that none of us will be around in 900 years to see what happens.
Dear Tim,
Well, it didn't start with speculation about what would happen in a
thousand years. It started with Hasan's questions as to whether, given
the doctrine
Hey David, this letter is splendid, thanks for quoting it here; you saved much much time quoting it!!!I hope many of us follow this noble action, quoting letters we receive from the House with absolute detachment.As to the letter,
Dear Susan,Bah'u'llh forbids us to interpret the holy verse of the Aqdas about 1000 or more years the next Coming.I wonder if this BADAH (the possibility of a Prophet before 1000 years) is broking that command.[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribi: I am curious about the purpose of
A scholar said me that in Tablets
not yet translated, Bahá'u'lláh links Mustaghath and its number
2001 with the numbers 9 and 19. I know great scholar Stephen
Lambden (http://www.hurqalya.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/BAHA'-ALLAH/L-
Khalil%20Shirazi.htm) explains about this issue, saying this could
Bahá'u'lláh forbids us to interpret the holy verse of the Aqdas
about 1000 or more years the next Coming.
I wonder if this BADAH (the possibility of a Prophet before 1000
years) is broking that command.
Dear Hasan,
Except what you are actually asking is not if the verse in question
Maybe I'm exaggerated about the importance of genetic lines, but I would like to follow the Muhammad, the Bb and Bah'u'llh genetic lines. From Adan to Shoghi Effendi, there is a continuous blood line, that is why I ask about the importance of "spiritual genes".[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribi:
From Adan to Shoghi Effendi, there is a continuous blood line,
that is why I ask about the importance of spiritual genes.
Dear Hasan,
It is not a blood line that can really be traced historically. Give a
few hundred years and everyone is related to everyone else anyhow.
warmest, Susan
Susan, do you think next Prophet will be a descendent of Abraham through Aghsán or Afnán lines?If the answer is yes, then how can we sure He/She is? Historically, Siyyid Kazim said the Qaim (the Báb) was of pure lineage, people can easy recognize it because of siyyids denomination.If
Dear Susan, do you know any text on whichtheCentral Figures or the Guardian mention the word badaa/badah? I would like to see the context/meaning of this word. [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribi: Bah'u'llh forbids us to interpret the holy verse of the Aqdas about 1000 or more years the next
Possibly from past lines.
I don't think you would like, but we can do this for Afnán and
Aghsán.
Dear Hasan,
I expect in a few hundred years everyone will have some Afnan blood in
their veins. As for those who descend from Covenant breakers, they are
more likely to want to hide their
Susan, do you think next Prophet will be a descendent of Abraham
through Aghsán or Afnán lines?
If the answer is ?yes?, then how can we sure He/She is?
Dear Hasan,
As a historian I can't even be sure that Abraham ever existed. But if
He did then I expect everyone will be a
I think that this is one of the instances of bada'a in the Writings. Here is is
translated as creation: . . . the Beauty of the Unseen hath shone forth
above the horizon of creation Prayers and Meditations p. 311.
Khazeh Fananapazir once said that bada'a is from the same root as Badi’. I
10. QUESTION: Shaving the head hath been forbidden in the
Kitáb-i-Aqdas but enjoined in the Suriy-i-Hajj.
ANSWER: All are charged with obedience to the
Kitáb-i-Aqdas; whatsoever is revealed therein is
the Law of God amid His servants. The injunction
on pilgrims to the sacred House to shave the
Khazeh Fananapazir once said that bada'a is from the same root as
Badi’.
Dear Brent,
My recollection is that he said they had a different root.
Unfortunately, we can't access the archives any more to check.
Khazeh jan, are you out there?
warmest, Susan
The information contained
My understanding is that this badAA concept/doctrine is a Shi`ii thing. I
don't know if Sunni Muslims have a particular emphasis on it. For Shi`ah
Muslims badAA is when God chnages His mind. The successor the the Shi`ah
6th Imam (Imam J`afar the Truthful) was supposed to be his son Ismael
Yes, I think the cut of Guardians line is about badaa, maybe because unworthiness of humans, and this unworthiness because we dont reach the high standard. If a hypothetically future living Guardian could easily recognize next Prophet, it will be ate bread (pan comido), humanity, thus wont
I'm not sure.[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribi: Possibly from past lines. I don't think you would like, but we can do this for Afnn and Aghsn. Dear Hasan, I expect in a few hundred years everyone will have some Afnan blood in their veins. As for those who descend from Covenant breakers, they are
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribi: As a historian I can't even be sure that Abraham ever existed. But if He did then I expect everyone will be a descendent from Abraham by the time the next Manifestation arrives. That is just the way demographics work. /For you a historian is the
So who do we dig up to get the DNA baseline? The Bab, since we have no direct descendants left, for sure - we need both his "Y" Chromosome DNA and his matrilineal mitochondrial material. Then we'll need the same for the line of Baha`u'llah - so we'll need to disinter either Bahas`u'llah or Abdu'l
too extreme no? you must be kidding,I thougtht there was another way like follow genealogical family tree but never desecrate holy tombs!...Scott Saylors [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribi:So who do we dig up to get the DNA baseline? The Bab, since we have no direct descendants left, for sure
Family trees are proof of nothing, really. They are at best a "contention". No, desecrating a tomb is not an answer, and getting actually genetic proof of anything is not going to be a possibility. The choice will have to be what it has always been, a spiritual decision, reached by taking free
You still joke? If family trees are nothing for you, then the hereditary principle (including our beloved Guardian in it) should be nothing but NOTHING for you until you check it in a laboratory! The same for the Imanate until you be sure or desecrate Imams holy tombs. The glorious lineage
I am not trying to upset you. I am not joking.Think of it this way: In the future someone appears CLAIMING to be the next Manifestation and produces a family tree showing he is descended from Baha`u'llah. Why can that family tree NOT be falsified? So, in that instance, it would prove nothing by
At 11:52 AM -0600 1/29/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From Adan to Shoghi Effendi, there is a continuous blood line,
that is why I ask about the importance of spiritual genes.
Dear Hasan,
It is not a blood line that can really be traced historically. Give a
few hundred years and everyone is
On 1/29/06, Hasan Elias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Susan, do you think next Prophet will be a descendent of Abraham through
Aghsán or Afnán lines?
If the answer is 'yes', then how can we sure He/She is? Historically, Siyyid
Kazim said the Qaim (the Báb) was of pure lineage, people can easy
Gilberto,
Did I miss your post apologizing to me, or did I not make it clear
that you are not welcome here without one?
Susan
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto (e-mail)
is sent by the Johnson County Community College (JCCC) and is intended to be
He used to say that in Baha'i theology, badAA simply means
that a
every 1000 years or so, a new manifestation of God comes and
changes/abrogates some Divine laws of the preceding Manifestaion
of God.
To me, this has always made a lot of sense. BadAA is nothing but
Progressive Revelation.
Regardless of how you spell it, badaa or
bada, the list vowel is a long"A" as in "fAther". You can trasliterate it
badA or badAA, or badaa, orbada, or whatever. The second letter is a short
"a" as in "bad". But I should have deferred to our very erudite Khazeh
...
Iskandar
Dear
On 1/30/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gilberto,
Did I miss your post apologizing to me, or did I not make it clear
that you are not welcome here without one?
I showed you evidence for my claims about your beliefs which was also
another option which you offered. But in
*/[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/* escribió:
...badaa signifies a change in the Divine Will. So theoretically
it would be possible. But given the strong language Baha'u'llah
used in that regard, I think it about as likely as God changing
the law of gravity (which
Is Badaa related Bidaa (Inovation)? Just curious.
Dear Rich,
They have a slightly different root.
warmest, Susan
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto (e-mail)
is sent by the Johnson County Community College (JCCC) and is intended to be
confidential
The quotes the Guardian gathered in the Dispensation state as explicitly as
any subject in the Baha'i Writings that it will be not less than 1000 years
before the next Manifestation. The Covenant, unlike other subjects in the
Faith (like the mystical teachings) are not hidden and waiting to be
The quotes the Guardian gathered in the Dispensation state as explicitly as
any subject in the Baha'i Writings that it will be not less than 1000 years
before the next Manifestation. The Covenant, unlike other subjects in the
Faith (like the mystical teachings) are not hidden and waiting to be
The Covenant is absolutely crystal-
clear, in
explicit verses. Not only Baha'u'llah's written Covenant to turn
to the
Master; and the Master's Covenant to turn to the House and the
Guardian; but
in addition Baha'u'llah's Covenant regarding the appearance of the
next
Manifestation.
Can anyone explain what "badaa" means? Is it that the will of God can change anytime? In other forum one said because of this badaa, the nextProphet may come BEFORE one thousand years. I think it is not possible. If yes: why yes?, if not: why not? Thanks, Hasan
The information
Yes, I believe this is the explanation the Hands gave for the ending of
the Guardianship. Marleen
Hasan Elias wrote:
Can anyone explain what "badaa" means?
Is it that the will of God can change anytime?
The information contained in this e-mail and any
Can anyone explain what badaa means? Is it that the will of God
can change anytime?
In other forum one said because of this badaa, the next
Prophet may come BEFORE one thousand years. I think it is not
possible. If yes: why yes?, if not: why not?
Dear Hasan,
I suppose you could say it
Susan, thanks for answer. I think it is NOT possible (not because God is not able to do that, but because of His Will); I have other personal reasons, but they are not scholar reasons, they are very "mine". Anyway, your reasoning of responsibility is pretty valid for me. Also, I would like
I didn't know,what was that explanation based on badaa???M Chase [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribi: Yes, I believe this is the explanation the Hands gave for the ending of the Guardianship. MarleenHasan Elias wrote: Can anyone explain what "badaa" means? Is it that the will of God can
Yes, I believe this is the explanation the Hands gave for the
ending of
the Guardianship. Marleen
Dear Marleen,
Actually they never did, though that would have been a logical
explanation. The Remeyites claim that the Hands declared the
Guardianship badaa, but they were not in the
Susan, thanks for answer. I think it is NOT possible (not because
God is not able to do that, but because of His Will);
Dear Badi,
Except badaa signifies a change in the Divine Will. So theoretically
it would be possible. But given the strong language Baha'u'llah used
in that regard, I
I hope that the Baha'is of the time will accept Him whenever He appears.
Richard.
I suppose you could say it was possible, but then we could not be held
responsible for failing to follow Him given the fact that we were told
to regard anyone who appeared before that time as a lying imposter.
They may not have said this publicly, but multiple Hands, including
Ruhiyyih Khanum, seem to have accepted this explanation, and I believe
some Persian Bahais were aware of this, but I cannot cite any Persian
sources. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable about Persian sources can
comment. Is
)
(Compilations, The Compilation of Compilations vol. I, p. 123)
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Baha'i Studies bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 1:53 PM
Subject: Re: badaa: a Prophet before one thousand years?
Yes, I believe this is the explanation
By the light of the surprising clarity of this prophecy, then:
what would be the difficulty for people (most of them bahá'ís) in
the year 2852-53? In another quote Bahá'u'lláh lamented about the
next Prophet's sufferings.
Dear Hasan,
Saying that a prophet will not appear until the
So far I know the House said nothing about badaa (they said it
was legally impossible to them designate another Guardian,
according to 'Abdu'l-Bahá's Will and their own powers).
That's correct. I personally think that the end of the line of living
Guardians was a case of Badaa just as
They may not have said this publicly, but multiple Hands,
including
Ruhiyyih Khanum, seem to have accepted this explanation, and I
believe
some Persian Bahais were aware of this, but I cannot cite any
Persian
sources.
Dear Marleen,
Although we have no documentation on this it
Dear Susan, you call "She" with capital S! uhmmm... you hope next Prophet be a woman?"She" or "He" whatever, I have no problems with it (but according to religious history, itcould be not a woman)my logic sense sayme that people will have many problems in one thousand years (about this
What a perfect example! ;-)
Jeanine
Hasan Elias wrote:
Dear Susan, you call "She" with
capital S! uhmmm... you hope next Prophet be a woman?
"She" or "He" whatever, I have no
problems with it (but according to religious history, itcould be not a
woman)...
At 4:27 PM -0600 1/27/06, Hasan Elias wrote:
By the light of the surprising clarity of this
prophecy, then: what would be the difficulty for
people (most of them bahá'ís) in the year
2852-53?
In general terms, it will be just like previous
times - people, including 'good Baha'is', will
In all past dispensations (the prophetic cycle), there were many signs,
prophecies, indications, etc.,concerning the One to come at the time of
the end, including where and how He would appear. He has come. I
have found very littlethe Writings concerning the One followin
notless than
At 10:22 PM -0500 1/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then, too, this is the day that shall not be followed by night.
Yeah, but as theologian Nels Ferre has suggested, when the Sun gets
too bright, we put up umbrellas.
The guidance will be there (Universal House of Justice), but that
Dear Susan, you call She with capital S! uhmmm... you hope next
Prophet be a woman?
LOL. Well, it would certainly explain the next Manifestation's
suffering!
She or He whatever, I have no problems with it (but
according to religious history, it could be not a woman)
Religious
I thought it would make my point. ;-}
What a perfect example! ;-)
Jeanine
Hasan Elias wrote:
Dear Susan, you call She with capital S! uhmmm... you hope
next
Prophet be a woman?
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto (e-mail)
is sent by the
The guidance will be there (Universal House of Justice), but that
doesn't mean we'll follow it
Dear Don,
I'm not sure if the Universal House of Justice would maintain its
authority once the next Manifestation appears. When Abdu'l-Baha was
asked about the meaning of whoso layeth a claim to
Maybe not all will follow it because they know the guidance will be there "until" the next Revelation, if I'm not wrong after that event, the House will be fallible. But, as the quote indicates the unity of followers is assured.All agreein that time it wont be easy for people to
Dear Susan dont you think I believe women can't do the job.The women in Bah' Faith are the example of excellence, for instance we had Bahyyih Khanm who was at the headship of the Guardians affairs for almost a year (a perfect job!). [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribi: Religious history is
Dear Susan, 1000 B.E. is only 2844 AD,the Aqdas's notes says we have to count from Islamic year nine = 15 October 1852 which match the period when Bah'u'llh was at Siyah-Chal. For solar years is from 15 October 2852 or from Ramadan 10th 2299 AH. Convert dates here:
89 matches
Mail list logo