Okay. Well, again, if I were talking about a particular human reality, I
would call it a particular. If I were talking about the reality of man (a
structurization, or dynamic power of naming, for humans collectively), I
would call it a universal.
Good. Thank you. I needed that specific
Hi Mark,
To Richard you wrote: Reality is constructed through the
dynamic process of naming.
By Reality do you iintend percieved reality ? And, if so,
can it be assumed that the process of naming is based on
recognizable attributes of a particular or universal ?
(and because Reality as
Hi, Sandra,
At 01:47 PM 11/3/2004, you wrote:
By Reality do you iintend percieved reality ? And, if so, can it be assumed that
the process of naming is based on recognizable attributes of a particular or
universal ?
By reality, I am referring to divinely and socially constructed reality, not
Yes, any system is, in my view, constructed through naming.
In this case, naming refers to
the *attribution* of characteristics.
Hi Mark,
Could you give an example of naming by attribution in each -
Particulars; Universals; and Structurizations...
And, include: who/what is
Hi, Sandra,
At 10:06 PM 11/3/2004, you wrote:
Could you give an example of naming by attribution in each - Particulars;
Universals; and Structurizations...
As I am using these terms, naming particulars by attribution would be identical to
universals or structurization. For instance, gender
