You're joking, right?
On 10/27/09, Bayan Sardari bayan.sard...@yahoo.com wrote:
hi all
thanks for your good comments but if 2950 doesen't support more than one ip
why does it support 64 vlans?it means we coulden't have more that one vlan
on it?we coulden't link it to a router (2621 for
Hi Bayan,
In 2950, the IP is only for mangement.
Vlan is Vlan, not to confuse with Vlan interface which is used for mangement
only in L2 Sw. You cannot do intervlan routing within 2950. You need trunk to
L3 device/router to do it.
You don't even need IP address to use 2950 Sw and Vlan. You can
And for the limitation of 64 VLANs, remember that you can have multiple
switches daisy-chained with trunks and that could mean that you have
traversing a lot of VLANs.
--
Regards,
Rick Mur
CCIE2 #21946 (RS / Service Provider)
Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
AFAIR the 64 VLAN limitation applies only if you're not using MST.
Kaj
From: Rick Mur r...@ipexpert.com
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:18:59 -0700
To: Aung Phyo Lwin aungphyol...@yahoo.com
Cc: ccie_rs@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] so why 2950 supports 64 vlans?
And for
/article.aspx?id=823454
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20091027/b48c1e3d/attachment-0001.htm
--
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:41:29 -0700
From: Mark Holloway
Guys,
One quick question.I saw in ipexpert labs that we should not
use show run during debugging/troubleshooting.Is it so ? In real lab
does that matter whether we resolve the teacat or it too matters how we
resolve it.For example: Does the script expect us to use so and so show
Nice feedback jmangawang, thank you very much for sharing your exerience
with us.
wish you thrive on your next try.
regards,
Fábio
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Dande Rajasekhar (drajasek)
draja...@cisco.com wrote:
Guys,
One quick question.I saw in ipexpert labs that we
The lab definitely allows you to use show run. And, if you can click
on a device on the diagram and it comes up with a terminal window,
then you've got full access to that device. As far as I could tell, I
had all my commands. There's a documentation section that tells you
what you are allowed
Thank you for sharing your 4.0 lab experience. I know I've been
incredibly curious about what they have changed so this was helpful.
One thing that you (and others) have mentioned about the exam that I
don't care for is the lack of a printed lab manual. I like that they
have a large monitor, but
Thanks for sharing and keep up the spirit Good luck next time!!
Angel.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:39 PM, jmangawang jmangaw...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I took the v4.0 lab last week and even though I walked out
knowing I failed, I was actually quite impressed with the test as a
whole. I
Ditto! We will all be thinking of you dude...I hope you are the FIRST we
hear about passing CCIE v4.0 : ) Best of luck, and can't wait to hear about
your experience.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:04 PM, nickst...@yahoo.com wrote:
Countdown! Hey Michael I know tomorrow is the day of your lab. go
I am struggling with the concept of address-family's. Does creating an
address-family create like a virtual router? Not sure why I would be using it.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20091027/ecef2fa0/a
ttachment-0001.htm
--
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:06:11 +0100
From: Kim Pedersen k.jun...@gmail.com
Subject: Re
was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20091027/ecef2fa0/a
ttachment-0001.htm
--
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:06:11 +0100
From: Kim Pedersen k.jun...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Countdown to your lab
Simple answer there is it can... But not always. The virtual router
thing happens when you use address-family ipv4 vrf xxx where the vrf
is your routing instance.
In all other instances it is a way of separating bits and pieces.
Namely the session info (how the neighbours are set up) and the
Hey Ed,
Every address family essentially has it's own BGP RIB. We have a BGP table for
every address family such as ipv4, ipv6, vpnv4, ipv4 vrf , etc...
--Original Message--
From: Bodnar, Edward
Sender: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
To: CCIE OSL
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS]
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 6:06 AM, Kim Pedersen k.jun...@gmail.com wrote:
Good Luck Michael,
Will be rooting for you!
Kim
Sorry, but we won't be rooting for you in Australia. We all really
hope you pass, but I don't think anyone's keen enough to *root* for
you.
I'll stand corrected. I
What are you saying?
I rather enjoy rooting. Are you saying you don't?
Cheers,
Matt
CCIE #22386
CCSI #31207
2009/10/28 Dale Shaw dale.shaw+cci...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 6:06 AM, Kim Pedersen k.jun...@gmail.com wrote:
Good Luck Michael,
Will be rooting for you!
Kim
All I'm sayin' is some other guy's CCIE journey isn't at the front of my mind.
So you ARE that kind of guy! Oh well, whatever it takes I guess.
I never want to see your *O*SPF face.
cheers,
Dale
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Matt Hill mayd...@gmail.com wrote:
What are you saying?
I
I think he was referring to the literal definition of 'root' which is
something that a pig generally does.
=-)
-Original Message-
From: BODA, BRIAN [mailto:brian.b...@hp.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 6:46 PM
To: Dale Shaw; Matt Hill
Cc: CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList;
Brian,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:45 PM, BODA, BRIAN brian.b...@hp.com wrote:
Wow Dale!
So disappointing that you cannot bring yourself to be happy that someone else
is trying to climb the mountain.
How did you really feel when Joe Astorino pasted earlier this year?
Actually, in that
21 matches
Mail list logo
