On Wed, Feb 21, 2018, at 4:36 PM, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:09:28 -0500 John Gabriele
> wrote:
>
> > How about instead adding a link to its online repo (at github, gitlab,
> > bitbucket, ...)? Is there a way to add those links to
Hi John,
On 2018-02-21 16:09, John Gabriele wrote:
> How about instead adding a link to its online repo (at github, gitlab,
> bitbucket, ...)? Is there a way to add those links to the eggs index
> page? That would be an excellent improvement.
Authors are encouraged to link to sources on the
I think that would be a mistake for the reason you give: it's often the
case that an egg hasn't been updated in a long while because it's complete
and nobody has found any bugs in it. Lisp/Scheme code tends to be
extremely durable: McCarthy's theorem prover from 1958 is still runnable
with only a
Hi all,
Haven't played around with scheme in a while, but recently was motivated to
take a peek at what eggs were currently available. I noticed at the [egg
index](http://wiki.call-cc.org/chicken-projects/egg-index-4.html) that although
there is much useful info provided (such as description,
How about instead adding a link to its online repo (at github, gitlab,
bitbucket, ...)? Is there a way to add those links to the eggs index
page? That would be an excellent improvement. When I look at a project's
online repo, seeing recent commits, issues, available docs, number of
Hi John,
On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:09:28 -0500 John Gabriele wrote:
> How about instead adding a link to its online repo (at github, gitlab,
> bitbucket, ...)? Is there a way to add those links to the eggs index
> page? That would be an excellent improvement. When I look at