On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 22:07:26 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review a change to add `@spec` tags (and remove some equivalent
>> `@see` tags) to the main "core-libs" packages in `java.base` module.
>>
>> This is similar to, and a subset of, PR #11073. That PR was withdrawn, and
>>
On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 16:28:14 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
> I didn't see any changes to security APIs - are they coming in a follow-on
> issue?
Yes, this is _Add `@spec` tags in java.base/java.* (part 1)_
The rest of `java.base` will be in part 2.
-
PR Comment:
> Please review a change to add `@spec` tags (and remove some equivalent `@see`
> tags) to the main "core-libs" packages in `java.base` module.
>
> This is similar to, and a subset of, PR #11073. That PR was withdrawn, and
> based on the ensuing discussion and suggestion, is now being handled
On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 10:45:39 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote:
> > Hi Jon,
> > This looks fine. I was wondering if we should do the same for java.util.zip
> > and the PKWare Zip Spec or where java.sql references the JDBC Spec?
>
> Well, I must need coffee this morning as obviously JDBC is in the
On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 17:14:01 GMT, Iris Clark wrote:
>> Jonathan Gibbons has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> address review feedback
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/ObjectOutputStream.java line 165:
>
>> 163: * @see
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 20:45:08 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review a change to add `@spec` tags (and remove some equivalent
>> `@see` tags) to the main "core-libs" packages in `java.base` module.
>>
>> This is similar to, and a subset of, PR #11073. That PR was withdrawn, and
>>
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 20:45:08 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review a change to add `@spec` tags (and remove some equivalent
>> `@see` tags) to the main "core-libs" packages in `java.base` module.
>>
>> This is similar to, and a subset of, PR #11073. That PR was withdrawn, and
>>
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 20:45:08 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review a change to add `@spec` tags (and remove some equivalent
>> `@see` tags) to the main "core-libs" packages in `java.base` module.
>>
>> This is similar to, and a subset of, PR #11073. That PR was withdrawn, and
>>
On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 10:33:50 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> This looks fine. I was wondering if we should do the same for java.util.zip
> and the PKWare Zip Spec or where java.sql references the JDBC Spec?
Well, I must need coffee this morning as obviously JDBC is in the java.sql
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 20:45:08 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review a change to add `@spec` tags (and remove some equivalent
>> `@see` tags) to the main "core-libs" packages in `java.base` module.
>>
>> This is similar to, and a subset of, PR #11073. That PR was withdrawn, and
>>
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 20:45:08 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review a change to add `@spec` tags (and remove some equivalent
>> `@see` tags) to the main "core-libs" packages in `java.base` module.
>>
>> This is similar to, and a subset of, PR #11073. That PR was withdrawn, and
>>
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 20:38:13 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> The initial assumption was "after the @param/@return/@throws group". Overall,
> as I said in the description for this PR, the block tags are not very
> consistent about ordering. I was thinking we might want to recommend an
> overall
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 20:45:08 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review a change to add `@spec` tags (and remove some equivalent
>> `@see` tags) to the main "core-libs" packages in `java.base` module.
>>
>> This is similar to, and a subset of, PR #11073. That PR was withdrawn, and
>>
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 20:28:52 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Thread.java line 1960:
>>
>>> 1958: * thread.
>>> 1959: *
>>> 1960: * @spec jni/index.html Java Native Interface Specification
>>
>> The link to the JNI spec in this
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 20:45:08 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review a change to add `@spec` tags (and remove some equivalent
>> `@see` tags) to the main "core-libs" packages in `java.base` module.
>>
>> This is similar to, and a subset of, PR #11073. That PR was withdrawn, and
>>
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 20:45:08 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review a change to add `@spec` tags (and remove some equivalent
>> `@see` tags) to the main "core-libs" packages in `java.base` module.
>>
>> This is similar to, and a subset of, PR #11073. That PR was withdrawn, and
>>
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 17:24:11 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> Please review a change to add `@spec` tags (and remove some equivalent `@see`
> tags) to the main "core-libs" packages in `java.base` module.
>
> This is similar to, and a subset of, PR #11073. That PR was withdrawn, and
> based on
> Please review a change to add `@spec` tags (and remove some equivalent `@see`
> tags) to the main "core-libs" packages in `java.base` module.
>
> This is similar to, and a subset of, PR #11073. That PR was withdrawn, and
> based on the ensuing discussion and suggestion, is now being handled
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 19:42:33 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Please review a change to add `@spec` tags (and remove some equivalent
>> `@see` tags) to the main "core-libs" packages in `java.base` module.
>>
>> This is similar to, and a subset of, PR #11073. That PR was withdrawn, and
>> based
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 17:24:11 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> Please review a change to add `@spec` tags (and remove some equivalent `@see`
> tags) to the main "core-libs" packages in `java.base` module.
>
> This is similar to, and a subset of, PR #11073. That PR was withdrawn, and
> based on
Please review a change to add `@spec` tags (and remove some equivalent `@see`
tags) to the main "core-libs" packages in `java.base` module.
This is similar to, and a subset of, PR #11073. That PR was withdrawn, and
based on the ensuing discussion and suggestion, is now being handled with a
21 matches
Mail list logo
