Hi Eric,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:24:06AM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
>
> We could have a meeting tomorrow, but attendance is often low when a
> meeting is announced on such short notice. I would suggest trying to
> settle on a schedule today, then set and announce the next meeting for
Hi all
I would suggest those who can, join in the meeting.
The agenda is a basic progress report, and then maybe we can also start
working on the 'web presence' points in wiki format that had such a good
start in another thread. I would also like to have names connected to
teams, as I am quite
(I didn't get Tassia's mail below for some reason ...)
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 09:26:34AM +0200, Bernelle Verster wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I would suggest those who can, join in the meeting.
Ok.
> Regards
> B
>
> On Wednesday, September 16, 2015, Tassia Camoes Araujo
> wrote:
>
Hi Eric,
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 08:27:58AM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015, Tassia Camoes Araujo
> > wrote:
> > Hi Eric,
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:24:06AM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> > > We could have a
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 09:28:00AM -0400, Tassia Camoes Araujo wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 08:27:58AM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015, Tassia Camoes Araujo
> > > wrote: Hi Eric, On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at
> > > 10:24:06AM
On 15/09/2015 13:13, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> On 15/09/2015 12:54, Bernelle Verster wrote:
>> It looks like Wednesdays 19:00 UTC (21:00 SAST/local event time) still
>> seems good. If there's no massive objections, can we then make the
>> meeting tomorrow night? Please add agenda items on the wiki
On 15/09/2015 12:54, Bernelle Verster wrote:
> It looks like Wednesdays 19:00 UTC (21:00 SAST/local event time) still
> seems good. If there's no massive objections, can we then make the
> meeting tomorrow night? Please add agenda items on the wiki (currently
> still blank) [1].
>
> Two things:
>
Hi Bernelle (2015.09.15_12:54:48_+0200)
> It looks like Wednesdays 19:00 UTC (21:00 SAST/local event time) still
> seems good. If there's no massive objections, can we then make the
> meeting tomorrow night? Please add agenda items on the wiki (currently
> still blank) [1].
Yeah, that sounds
Hi Jonathan (2015.09.15_13:33:45_+0200)
> *ahem*, make that "Alternating between Wednesday and Thursday sounds
> reasonable".
So, looking at the dudle, 2 chairs who can make Wednesdays can't make
Thursdays. And the only person that seems to benefit from Thursday is
Jan-Marek.
Is the complication
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 12:54:48PM +0200, Bernelle Verster wrote:
> It looks like Wednesdays 19:00 UTC (21:00 SAST/local event time) still
> seems good. If there's no massive objections, can we then make the
> meeting tomorrow night? Please add agenda items on the wiki (currently
> still blank)
So.. who's making a call on the dudle?
It looks like Wednesdays 19:00 UTC (21:00 SAST/local event time) still
seems good. If there's no massive objections, can we then make the
meeting tomorrow night? Please add agenda items on the wiki (currently
still blank) [1].
Two things:
* Daylight savings
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Bernelle (2015.09.15_12:54:48_+0200)
>> It looks like Wednesdays 19:00 UTC (21:00 SAST/local event time) still
>> seems good. If there's no massive objections, can we then make the
>> meeting tomorrow night? Please
>There will be one more meeting on the old schedule: #debconf16-capetown,
>at 18:30 UTC on Wednesday 9th:
>https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16/Meetings/2015-09-09
Perfect thanks Stefano for clearing that up.
Regards
Tammy
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Stefano Rivera
While work on the DC15 final report continues, our focus starts to shift
to the next DebConf, DC16.
Until now, the DC16 team has been meeting on Wednesdays at 18:30 UTC.
However, that may not work for the rest of the broader DebConf team, so
we are re-polling on the best time for meetings:
14 matches
Mail list logo