Bug#1060259: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#1060259: zfs-dkms: Fails to build after upgrade to linux-image-6.1.0-17-amd64

2024-01-08 Thread 陈 晟祺
Control: tags -1 + unreproducible
Control: severity -1 normal

Hi,

> Building DKMS modules for zfs started to fail after upgrading to the latest 
> (6.1.0-17) kernel available for 
> Bookworm preventing successful configuration of following packages:
> 
> linux-image-6.1.0-17-amd64
> linux-headers-6.1.0-17-amd64

I tried to install zfs-dkms 2.11-1 on 6.1.0-17-amd64 and no errors were found.
I wander whether the source in dkms was somehow altered, and a reinstall may 
solve the problem.
And installing a new version from bpo is, of course, a way of reinstallation.

Thanks,
Shengqi Chen



Bug#1060305: libifd-cyberjack6: Package is out of date. 3 new hardware devices are not supported, which are already supported in upstream

2024-01-08 Thread Oliver C.
Package: libifd-cyberjack6
Version: 3.99.5final.sp14-2
Severity: important
Tags: a11y upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: s...@kernelport.com, siret...@tauware.de, kreuzritter2...@gmx.de

The current version available in the Debain Stable's (12) repository is
3.99.5final.sp14-2 and 3.99.5final.sp14-2+b1 in unstable (SID). But the
manufacturer's version is 3.99.5final.sp16.

See here for the upstream deb package:
https://support.reiner-sct.de/downloads/LINUX/V3.99.5_SP16/libifd-
cyberjack6_3.99.5final.sp16_amd64_d12.deb

And the source release:
https://support.reiner-sct.de/downloads/LINUX/V3.99.5_SP16/pcsc-
cyberjack-3.99.5final.SP16.tar.bz2

The changelog of this much newer version 3.99.5final.sp16 shows the following:

 Begin changelog:
pcsc-cyberjack (3.99.5final.sp16) unstable; urgency=low
  * add REINER SCT cyberJack RFID standard EN

 -- Frank Neuber   Thu, 26 Oct 2023 22:46:54 +0200

pcsc-cyberjack (3.99.5final.sp15) unstable; urgency=low
  * add REINER SCT cyberJack wave HUN
  * add REINER SCT cyberJack RFID komfort FON

 -- Frank Neuber   Fri, 01 Oct 2021 08:11:04 +

pcsc-cyberjack (3.99.5final.sp14) unstable; urgency=low
  * Update to the Reiner-SCT repository rev cyberJack@1454

 -- Frank Neuber   Mon, 02 Dec 2019 16:57:46 +0100
### End changelog

This means, that the devices:
* REINER SCT cyberJack RFID standard EN
* REINER SCT cyberJack wave HUN
and
* REINER SCT cyberJack RFID komfort FON
are not supported in the current version of Debian.

The device REINER SCT cyberJack RFID komfort FON device is for users with
disabilities.
As of now, all three devices are not supported by Debian 12 because this
package is out of date.

You should also read bug report:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1010675
It might be related to this bug #1010675, because the new upstream version
ships as .bz2 file and in the other
bug report has someone mentioned, that the old uscan filter does only search
for .tar.gz files.
But this is definitely not a minor bug, like the this other bug report claims,
when you can't use these new three devices.

The devices
* REINER SCT cyberJack wave HUN
and
* REINER SCT cyberJack RFID komfort FON
got a patch in upstream on Fri, 01 Oct 2021. Debian stable was released in June
10, 2023.

So it's high time that the new version is added to Debian SID and a Debian
backport version for Debian 12 or an update with the next Debian 12 point
release is added. After all, this is about driver support and support for new
hardware.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.4
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-17-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, 
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages libifd-cyberjack6 depends on:
ii  libc6 2.36-9+deb12u3
ii  libgcc-s1 12.2.0-14
ii  libstdc++612.2.0-14
ii  libusb-1.0-0  2:1.0.26-1
ii  pcscd 1.9.9-2

libifd-cyberjack6 recommends no packages.

Versions of packages libifd-cyberjack6 suggests:
ii  pcsc-tools  1.6.2-1

-- no debconf information


changelog.Debian.gz
Description: application/gzip


Bug#1058083: Before I try to tackle this bug - can we move the package to DPT

2024-01-08 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Ulises,

Am Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 09:18:46AM -0300 schrieb Ulises Vitulli:
> Feel free to go ahead with my blessing right away!

Bug fixed in a team upload on behalf of Debian Python Team.

Kind regards
   Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Bug#1059484: rasdaemon: autopkgtest failure: cannot access '/var/lib/rasdaemon/ras-mc_event.db'

2024-01-08 Thread Taihsiang Ho (tai271828)
I am enlightened by Paul
https://lists.debian.org/debian-ci/2024/01/msg0.html and Simon
https://lists.debian.org/debian-ci/2024/01/msg4.html . I will try
to resolve this issue by introducing iso-machine and more portable
tests. -tai

On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 9:46 PM Taihsiang Ho (tai271828)  
wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> Thanks for reporting the issue. I will take a look.
>
> -tai
>
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 7:09 PM Paul Gevers  wrote:
> >
> > Source: rasdaemon
> > Version: 0.8.0-1
> > Severity: serious
> > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: fails-always
> >
> > Dear maintainer(s),
> >
> > You recently added an autopkgtest to your package rasdaemon, great.
> > However, it fails. Currently this failure is blocking the migration to
> > testing [1]. Can you please investigate the situation and fix it?
> >
> > I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report.
> >
> > More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
> > https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > [1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=rasdaemon
> >
> > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/rasdaemon/40156577/log.gz
> >
> >   34s ls: cannot access '/var/lib/rasdaemon/ras-mc_event.db': No such
> > file or directory
> >   34s autopkgtest [11:52:08]: test ras-mc-ctl



Bug#1060259: Acknowledgement (zfs-dkms: Fails to build after upgrade to linux-image-6.1.0-17-amd64)

2024-01-08 Thread Juhamatti Niemelä
Tried upgrading to backports as suggested in Debian Wiki:
https://wiki.debian.org/ZFS#Installation and issue seems to be fixed there.
Using version (2.2.2-3~bpo12+1)

After: apt install -t bookworm-backports zfsutils-linux zfs-dkms

DKMS module builds for both 6.1.0-15-amd64 and 6.1.0-17-amd64 succeeded.


Bug#1060303: iperf3: a new version has released is 3.16 not 3.16-beta1

2024-01-08 Thread Boyuan Yang
X-Debbugs-CC: ro...@debian.org

On Tue, 09 Jan 2024 05:58:52 + Poao  wrote:
> Package: iperf3
> Version: 3.15-1+b1
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-Cc: zongb...@icloud.com
> 
> this package latest version 3.16 is not beta since 2023-11-30. and its
> upstream has released it since 2023-12-02. 

The proposed patch for debian/watch file is provided in the attachment.
I am not tagging the "patch" tag since a new upload with new version
is needed anyway.

Meanwhile, it would be great if v3.16 is packaged given its new
multithreading support and improved OpenSSL 3 support. Please check
upstream release notes for details.

Thanks,
Boyuan Yang
From b6e7c7bf0feb3403d452672d3be3a55ba318db5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Boyuan Yang 
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 01:40:18 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] debian/watch: Handle version with dash

---
 debian/watch | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/debian/watch b/debian/watch
index 2506a87..1a9d743 100644
--- a/debian/watch
+++ b/debian/watch
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 version=4
-opts=filenamemangle=s/.+\/v?(\d\S+)\.tar\.gz/iperf-$1\.tar\.gz/ \
+opts="uversionmangle=s/-/~/,filenamemangle=s/.+\/v?(\d\S+)\.tar\.gz/iperf-$1\.tar\.gz/" \
   https://github.com/esnet/iperf/tags .*/v?(\d\S+)\.tar\.gz
-- 
2.43.0



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#1060304: zenity: bring back preselection of nonexisting file names with --save

2024-01-08 Thread Rainer Schwarzbach
Package: zenity
Version: 4.0.1-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: rz49...@gmx.net

Dear Maintainer,

having used zenity sporadically (ie. in a self-written script wrapping
scanimage and PDF generation from the scans for archiving of documents), I
recently noticed that it is not possible anymore to preselect a not-yet-
existing filename using the options combination --file-selection --save
--filename=path/to/new-file (assuming the path/to directory exists) using
zenity from sid. The file name field stays empty.
I noticed this bevaviour in the past few days, so it had already been present
in version 4.0.0-1.

In the zenity version contained in bookworm (3.44.0), the suggested new file
name appears in the dialog as expected, so this might be a regression caused by
upstream changes.

Kind regards
Rainer


-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.6.9-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages zenity depends on:
ii  libadwaita-1-0  1.4.2-1+b1
ii  libc6   2.37-13
ii  libglib2.0-02.78.3-1
ii  libgtk-4-1  4.12.4+ds-3
ii  libpango-1.0-0  1.51.0+ds-3
ii  zenity-common   4.0.1-1

zenity recommends no packages.

zenity suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



Bug#1060288: locales: Please allow selection of C.UTF-8 when (re)configuring locales

2024-01-08 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi,

On 2024-01-08 22:06, Axel Scheepers wrote:
> Package: locales
> Version: 2.36-9+deb12u3
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: d-i l10n
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> It would be nice to have C.UTF-8 in the list which dpkg-reconfigure locales
> shows; When installing a desktop I usually select the C locale since the

C.UTF-8 is not shown on purpose, because it doesn't need to be
generated, it is always available on the system. What you want is
probably to be able to select it as a default locale.

The real issue is that the menu to select the default locale is only
shown if there is a locale to generate.

> others don't really apply and I'm unable to use a different locale setting
> for date and lang. This however breaks gnome since it requires a utf-8
> locale and I'm unable to select C.UTF-8 at installation.
> A workaround is to uncomment the C.UTF-8 locale in /etc/locale.gen
> and run dpkg-reconfigure locales after installation.

A better workaround is probably to select a random locale to be
generated, then you should be able to select the C.UTF-8 locale as
default.

Regards
Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno  GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net



Bug#1052902: yosys: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Makefile:971: docs/gen_images] Error 2

2024-01-08 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 03/12/23 at 19:00 +0100, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
> 
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 09:45:53AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > As an additional data point, I can still reproduce this.
> > I cannot provide the buildinfo, as sbuild outputs it at the end of
> > successful builds.
> 
> Doh! Didn't think of that. Something to improve in sbuild I guess :)
> 
> > However, in the build log there's the list of installed packages, which
> > might be sufficient...
> 
> Since I've sucessfully rebuilt yosys agains unstable and it's still failing
> for you it's pretty much moot. I just thought you'd have the buildinfos at
> hand.
> 
> I'm essentially waiting for make 4.4 to make it into Debian as Santiago
> pointed out it may help track this down, but if I can't repro this (and I
> have still never seen this) there's not much I can do without access to a
> system this repros on.
> 
> If you can reliably reproduce this could you try doing a -j1 rebuild? That
> should at least tell us if it's a concurrency issue or not.

Hi,

I confirm that it still fails, but succeeds when building with
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=1

So yes, it's a concurrency issue.

Lucas



Bug#1060303: iperf3: a new version has released is 3.16 not 3.16-beta1

2024-01-08 Thread Poao
Package: iperf3
Version: 3.15-1+b1
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: zongb...@icloud.com

this package latest version 3.16 is not beta since 2023-11-30. and its
upstream has released it since 2023-12-02. 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.5.0-5-cloud-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages iperf3 depends on:
ii  adduser3.137
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.83
ii  init-system-helpers1.66
ii  libc6  2.37-13
ii  libiperf0  3.15-1+b1

iperf3 recommends no packages.

iperf3 suggests no packages.

-- debconf information:
* iperf3/start_daemon: false



Bug#1060299: libboost1.83-dev: After installing libboost-all-dev I can't perform an upgrade anymore

2024-01-08 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi,

thanks for the bugreport. You have a nice mix of many third-party repos
in the /etc/apt/sources.list, which can break the installation.

Regards

Anton


Am Di., 9. Jan. 2024 um 03:00 Uhr schrieb Harald 
:

> ~# apt-get update && apt-get upgrade
> Get:1
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/hawkeye116477:/waterfox/Debian_Unstable
> InRelease [1,594 B]
> Hit:2 http://security.debian.org testing-security InRelease
> Get:3
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/stevenpusser/Debian_10
> InRelease [1,547 B]
> Hit:4 https://noone.org/conkeror-nightly-debs sid InRelease
> Hit:5 https://deb.opera.com/opera-stable stable InRelease
> Hit:6 http://packages.microsoft.com/repos/code stable InRelease
> Hit:8 https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian trixie InRelease
> Hit:9 https://updates.signal.org/desktop/apt xenial InRelease
> Hit:10 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sid InRelease
> Hit:7 https://debian.qgis.org/debian-nightly sid InRelease
>
:


Bug#1060302: RFS: quickemu/4.9.2-1 [RFP] -- quickly create and run optimised virtual machines

2024-01-08 Thread Maytham Alsudany
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: 1018...@bugs.debian.org, ben...@debian.org

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "quickemu":

 * Package name : quickemu
   Version  : 4.9.2-1
   Upstream contact : https://github.com/quickemu-project/quickemu/issues
 * URL  : https://github.com/quickemu-project/quickemu
 * License  : Expat
 * Vcs  : https://salsa.debian.org/Maytha8/quickemu
   Section  : utils

The source builds the following binary packages:

  quickemu - quickly create and run optimised virtual machines

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/quickemu/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/quickemu/quickemu_4.9.2-1.dsc

Changes for the initial release:

 quickemu (4.9.2-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
 .
   * Initial release. (Closes: #1018072)

Kind regards,
Maytham


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#1060300: virt-v2v: needs to update OVMF x86_64 pflash images path to match the new 4MB images

2024-01-08 Thread Santiago Ruano Rincón
Source: virt-v2v
Version: 2.2.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: Lee Garrett 

Dear maintainer,

With edk2 2023.11-2, the OVMF 2MB pflash images have been removed and
replaced with their 4MB counterparts.
See 
https://salsa.debian.org/qemu-team/edk2/-/blob/76f721d51f93647a8f3650f9f26593ff82089ad0/debian/ovmf.NEWS

Currently, virt-v2v is unable to convert a Win 11 image (from ova to
qcow2) since it is not able to find the UEFI files. ovmf 2023.11-3 is
currently installed on my system.

virt-v2v -v -x -i ova -o libvirt -of qcow2 -oo compressed -oc 
'qemu:///system' ~/.cache/ansible_bootstrap_win11_vm/win11.zip -on win11

fails with:

virt-v2v: error: cannot find firmware for UEFI guests.

You probably need to install OVMF (x86-64), or AAVMF (aarch64)

I can provide a full log, if needed

A fix can be found in 
https://salsa.debian.org/santiago/virt-v2v/-/commits/OVMF-4M

Cheers,

 -- Santiago

-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers stable-security
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 
'oldstable-security'), (500, 'oldoldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldoldstable'), 
(500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.5.0-5-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

-- no debconf information


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1060274: RFS: python-acora/2.4-1.1 [NMU] [RC] -- fast multi-keyword text search engine (Python 2)

2024-01-08 Thread Bo YU
tags -1 - moreinfo


Hi,

On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 5:15 AM Bastian Germann  wrote:
>
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo

>
> Please check the archive before posting NMUs based on old versions.
> Also, a new upstream version needs the NMU revision -0.1, not -1.1.

Thanks for pushing updated upload to debian salsa repo. This is become
easy to update upstream release. so

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-acora":

 * Package name : python-acora
   Version  : 2.4-0.1
   Upstream contact : [fill in name and email of upstream]
 * URL  : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/acora
 * License  : BSD-3-Clause
 * Vcs  : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/python-acora
   Section  : python

The source builds the following binary packages:

  python3-acora - fast multi-keyword text search engine (Python 3)

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-acora/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-acora/python-acora_2.4-0.1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 python-acora (2.4-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   [ Bastian Germann ]
   * Remove .git suffix from Vcs-Browser
 .
   [ Bo YU ]
   * New upstream version 2.4. (Closes: #1056849, #1055707)

Please let me know any issues.

BR,
Bo

>



Bug#1058106: python-ml-collections: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'imp'

2024-01-08 Thread Yogeswaran Umasankar

Hi,
I have modified the previous patch in my last report to fix the
autopkgtest errors. Attaching the updated debdiff file.
Cheers!
diff -Nru python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/changelog 
python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/changelog
--- python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/changelog2023-04-01 
05:59:28.0 +
+++ python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/changelog2024-01-08 
20:00:00.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+python-ml-collections (0.1.1-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+  * Team upload.
+  * Included a patch for ml_collections/config_flags/config_flags.py
+to replace deprecated imp with importlib to fix ModuleNotFoundError
+in Python 3.12. (Closes: #1058106)
+  * Added python3-absl, python3-contextlib2, python3-yaml, python3-six
+to tests-depends.
+  * Added python3-six to Build-Depends and Depends in d/control.
+  * Disabled 2 bazel tests in autopkgtest.
+
+ -- Yogeswaran Umasankar   Mon, 08 Jan 2024 20:00:00 +
+
 python-ml-collections (0.1.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Team Upload.
diff -Nru python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/control 
python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/control
--- python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/control  2023-04-01 05:59:04.0 
+
+++ python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/control  2024-01-08 20:00:00.0 
+
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
dh-python,
python3-all,
python3-setuptools,
+   python3-six,
python3-absl ,
python3-contextlib2 ,
python3-yaml 
@@ -22,7 +23,8 @@
 Depends: ${python3:Depends}, ${misc:Depends},
  python3-absl,
  python3-contextlib2,
- python3-yaml
+ python3-yaml,
+ python3-six
 Suggests: python-is-python3
 Description: collections designed for ML usecases
  The package provices two classes called ConfigDict and FrozenConfigDict that
diff -Nru 
python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/patches/002_imp-module-replacement.patch 
python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/patches/002_imp-module-replacement.patch
--- python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/patches/002_imp-module-replacement.patch 
1970-01-01 00:00:00.0 +
+++ python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/patches/002_imp-module-replacement.patch 
2024-01-08 20:00:00.0 +
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+Description: Implemented importlib to fix ModuleNotFoundError with Python 3.12.
+Author: Yogeswaran Umasankar 
+Last-Update: 2024-01-08
+
+--- a/ml_collections/config_flags/config_flags.py
 b/ml_collections/config_flags/config_flags.py
+@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
+ """Configuration commmand line parser."""
+ 
+ import errno
+-import imp
++import importlib.util
+ import os
+ import re
+ import sys
+@@ -450,8 +450,9 @@ def _LoadConfigModule(name: str, path: s
+ 
+   # Works for relative paths.
+   with ignoring_errors.Attempt('Relative path', path):
+-config_module = imp.load_source(name, path)
+-return config_module
++  spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location(name, path)
++  config_module = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec)
++  spec.loader.exec_module(config_module)
+ 
+   # Nothing worked. Log the paths that were attempted.
+   raise IOError('Failed loading config file {}\n{}'.format(
diff -Nru python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/patches/series 
python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/patches/series
--- python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/patches/series   2023-04-01 
05:50:43.0 +
+++ python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/patches/series   2024-01-08 
20:00:00.0 +
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 noRequirements.patch
+002_imp-module-replacement.patch
diff -Nru python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/tests/control 
python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/tests/control
--- python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/tests/control2023-04-01 
05:56:46.0 +
+++ python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/tests/control2024-01-08 
20:00:00.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 Tests: run-unit-test
-Depends: @, bazel-bootstrap, python3-mock, python-is-python3
+Depends: @, bazel-bootstrap, python3-mock, python-is-python3, python3-absl, 
python3-contextlib2, python3-yaml, python3-six
 Restrictions: allow-stderr, skip-not-installable
diff -Nru python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/tests/run-unit-test 
python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/tests/run-unit-test
--- python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/tests/run-unit-test  2023-04-01 
05:50:43.0 +
+++ python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/tests/run-unit-test  2024-01-08 
20:00:00.0 +
@@ -22,5 +22,6 @@
 cp ${CUR_DIR}/debian/tests/data/BUILD.flags_examples 
${pkg}/config_flags/examples/BUILD
 cp ${CUR_DIR}/debian/tests/data/BUILD.test_flags 
${pkg}/config_flags/tests/BUILD
 
-bazel test ml_collections/...
+bazel test ml_collections/... 
--test_filter=-//ml_collections/config_dict/examples:examples_test,-//ml_collections/config_flags/tests:config_overriding_test
+#For time being disabled two tests in bazel to avoid autopkgtest error.
 echo "PASS"


signature.asc
Description: PGP 

Bug#1060299: libboost1.83-dev: After installing libboost-all-dev I can't perform an upgrade anymore

2024-01-08 Thread Harald
Package: libboost1.83-dev
Version: 1.83.0-2
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

after installing libboost-all-dev I can't perform an upgrade anymore.

On 2023-12-27 I installed libboost-all-dev and removed everything from previous 
boost
versions without getting an error or even a warning:

>From /var/log/apt/history:
"""
Start-Date: 2023-12-27  14:20:04
Commandline: apt-get install libboost-all-dev
...
Start-Date: 2023-12-27  14:23:48
Commandline: apt-get autoremove
...
Start-Date: 2023-12-27  14:34:28
Commandline: apt-get remove libboost-filesystem1.74.0 libboost-iostreams1.74.0 
libboost-thread1.74.0
...
Start-Date: 2023-12-27  14:23:48
Commandline: apt-get autoremove
...
Start-Date: 2023-12-27  14:34:28
Commandline: apt-get remove libboost-filesystem1.74.0 libboost-iostreams1.74.0 
libboost-thread1.74.0
...
Start-Date: 2023-12-27  14:41:09
Commandline: apt-get autoremove
"""

~# apt-get update && apt-get upgrade
Get:1 
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/hawkeye116477:/waterfox/Debian_Unstable
  InRelease [1,594 B]
Hit:2 http://security.debian.org testing-security InRelease
Get:3 http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/stevenpusser/Debian_10  
InRelease [1,547 B]
Hit:4 https://noone.org/conkeror-nightly-debs sid InRelease
Hit:5 https://deb.opera.com/opera-stable stable InRelease
Hit:6 http://packages.microsoft.com/repos/code stable InRelease
Hit:8 https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian trixie InRelease
Hit:9 https://updates.signal.org/desktop/apt xenial InRelease
Hit:10 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sid InRelease
Hit:7 https://debian.qgis.org/debian-nightly sid InRelease
Fetched 3,141 B in 1s (3,176 B/s)
Reading package lists... Done
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 libboost1.83-dev : Conflicts: libboost1.81-dev but 1.81.0-7+b1 is to be 
installed
E: Broken packages

-
additional information:

~# apt-cache policy libboost1.83-dev
libboost1.83-dev:
  Installed: 1.83.0-2
  Candidate: 1.83.0-2
  Version table:
 *** 1.83.0-2 500
500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sid/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

~# apt-cache policy libboost1.81-dev
libboost1.81-dev:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 1.81.0-7+b1
  Version table:
 1.81.0-7+b1 500
500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sid/main amd64 Packages


Actually I don't have a single package from boost1.81 or earlier installed.
All installed boost-packages contain 83:

~# dpkg -l *boost* |grep "^ii" |grep -v 83
~#

-

Trying a dist-upgrade would seemingly fix the libboost issue. At least the "E:
Broken packages" doesn't appear there. However, dry-running
it (apt-get -s dist-upgrade), reveals the process would remove the package
initscripts.

It seems too risky to me to do so. Can I even be sure the systemwould come up?
(Both /usr/sbin/init and /sbin/init are symlinks to /lib/systemd/systemd, so I 
assume I'm
on systemd.)

Since I'm not a weathered sysadmin I'm not sure whether I'd be able to
handle a fully dysfunctional system.

Can you please advise me on how to proceed?

Thanks and cheers
Harald

PS: reportbug created this message but tried to send it with sendmail (not 
configured 
for remote sending)-

So I reassembled the email from /var/spool/exim4

I hope I didn't miss anything important.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 6.6.8-amd64 (SMP w/24 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_WARN, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, 
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages libboost1.83-dev depends on:
ii  libstdc++-13-dev  13.2.0-9

libboost1.83-dev recommends no packages.

Versions of packages libboost1.83-dev suggests:
ii  libboost-atomic1.83-dev   1.83.0-2
ii  libboost-chrono1.83-dev   1.83.0-2
ii  libboost-container1.83-dev1.83.0-2
ii  libboost-context1.83-dev  1.83.0-2
pn  libboost-contract1.83-dev 
ii  libboost-coroutine1.83-dev1.83.0-2
ii  libboost-date-time1.83-dev1.83.0-2
ii  libboost-exception1.83-dev1.83.0-2
ii  libboost-fiber1.83-dev1.83.0-2
ii  libboost-filesystem1.83-dev   1.83.0-2
ii  libboost-graph-parallel1.83-dev   1.83.0-2
ii  libboost-graph1.83-dev1.83.0-2
ii  

Bug#1060298: pocl: update llvm version in debian/control

2024-01-08 Thread Zhang Na
Source: pocl
Version: 4.0-3
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: zhan...@loongson.cn

Dear Maintainer,

  Please update llvm version in debian/control, thanks! The latest
  version of LLVM is 16 in Debian. Convenient support for more new
  architectures.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers unreleased
  APT policy: (500, 'unreleased'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: loong64 (loongarch64)

Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-60.96.0.126.oe2203.loongarch64 (SMP w/32 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=zh_CN.UTF-8 (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) 
(ignored: LC_ALL set to C), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: unable to detect
>From 318a56cba2c1fe681fc453fdf91858f6ca66e993 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zhang Na 
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 10:02:05 +
Subject: [PATCH] update llvm-16 in  debian/control

---
 debian/control | 8 
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index db25d45..a732143 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -7,10 +7,10 @@ Uploaders: Vincent Danjean ,
 Build-Depends:
  debhelper-compat (= 13),
  gcc (>= 4:13),
- clang-15,
- libclang-15-dev,
- libclang-cpp15-dev,
- llvm-15-dev,
+ clang-16, 
+ libclang-16-dev,
+ libclang-cpp16-dev,
+ llvm-16-dev,
  cmake,
  libhwloc-dev,
  ocl-icd-dev,
-- 
2.43.0

--- debian/libpocl2.symbols (libpocl2_4.0-3_loong64)
+++ dpkg-gensymbolsd953pV   2024-01-08 10:12:19.307182559 +
@@ -25,40 +25,40 @@
  
_ZGVZNKSt8__detail11_AnyMatcherINSt7__cxx1112regex_traitsIcEELb0ELb1ELb0EEclEcE5__nul@Base
 3.0
  
_ZGVZNKSt8__detail11_AnyMatcherINSt7__cxx1112regex_traitsIcEELb0ELb1ELb1EEclEcE5__nul@Base
 3.0
  _ZN4pocl23eraseFunctionAndCallersEPN4llvm8FunctionE@Base 1.8-3~visibility
-#MISSING: 1.8# 
(optional=templinst)_ZNSt6vectorINSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEESaIS5_EE12emplace_backIJS5_EEEvDpOT_@Base
 0.11
-#MISSING: 1.8# 
(optional=templinst)_ZNSt6vectorINSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEESaIS5_EE17_M_realloc_insertIJRKS5_EEEvN9__gnu_cxx17__normal_iteratorIPS5_S7_EEDpOT_@Base
 0.13-9~llvm3.8+gcc7
-#MISSING: 1.8# 
(optional=templinst)_ZNSt6vectorINSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEESaIS5_EE17_M_realloc_insertIJS5_EEEvN9__gnu_cxx17__normal_iteratorIPS5_S7_EEDpOT_@Base
 0.13-9~llvm3.8+gcc7
-#MISSING: 1.8# 
(optional=templinst)_ZNSt6vectorIPKcSaIS1_EE17_M_realloc_insertIJS1_EEEvN9__gnu_cxx17__normal_iteratorIPS1_S3_EEDpOT_@Base
 0.13-9~llvm3.8+gcc7
-#MISSING: 1.8# 
(optional=templinst|subst)_ZNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEE10_M_replaceE{size_t}{size_t}PKc{size_t}@Base
 1.6-2~hardening
+#MISSING: 4.0-3# 
(optional=templinst)_ZNSt6vectorINSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEESaIS5_EE12emplace_backIJS5_EEEvDpOT_@Base
 0.11
+#MISSING: 4.0-3# 
(optional=templinst)_ZNSt6vectorINSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEESaIS5_EE17_M_realloc_insertIJRKS5_EEEvN9__gnu_cxx17__normal_iteratorIPS5_S7_EEDpOT_@Base
 0.13-9~llvm3.8+gcc7
+#MISSING: 4.0-3# 
(optional=templinst)_ZNSt6vectorINSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEESaIS5_EE17_M_realloc_insertIJS5_EEEvN9__gnu_cxx17__normal_iteratorIPS5_S7_EEDpOT_@Base
 0.13-9~llvm3.8+gcc7
+#MISSING: 4.0-3# 
(optional=templinst)_ZNSt6vectorIPKcSaIS1_EE17_M_realloc_insertIJS1_EEEvN9__gnu_cxx17__normal_iteratorIPS1_S3_EEDpOT_@Base
 0.13-9~llvm3.8+gcc7
+#MISSING: 4.0-3# 
(optional=templinst|subst)_ZNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEE10_M_replaceE{size_t}{size_t}PKc{size_t}@Base
 1.6-2~hardening
 #MISSING: 1.8# 
(optional=templinst|arch=mipsel)_ZNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEE12_M_constructIPKcEEvT_S8_St20forward_iterator_tag@Base
 1.1-6~llvm6.0+gcc8
  
(optional=templinst|subst)_ZNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEE15_M_replace_coldEPc{size_t}PKc{size_t}{size_t}@Base
 4.0-2~gcc13
-#MISSING: 1.8# 
(optional=templinst)_ZNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEE4swapERS4_@Base
 1.6-2~hardening
-#MISSING: 1.8# 
(optional=templinst|subst)_ZNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEE9_M_appendEPKc{size_t}@Base
 1.6-2~hardening
-#MISSING: 1.8# 
(optional=templinst)_ZNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEE9_M_assignERKS4_@Base
 1.6-2~hardening
-#MISSING: 4.0-2~gcc13# 
(optional=templinst|subst)_ZNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEE9_M_mutateE{size_t}{size_t}PKc{size_t}@Base
 4
- (optional=templinst|arch=amd64 arm64 mips64el ppc64el riscv64 
sparc64)_ZNSt8_Rb_treeIN3spv10DecorationES1_St9_IdentityIS1_ESt4lessIS1_ESaIS1_EE16_M_insert_uniqueIRKS1_EESt4pairISt17_Rb_tree_iteratorIS1_EbEOT_@Base
 4
-#MISSING: 1.8# 
(optional=templinst)_ZNSt8_Rb_treeINSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEES5_St9_IdentityIS5_ESt4lessIS5_ESaIS5_EE24_M_get_insert_unique_posERKS5_@Base
 1.0
-#MISSING: 1.8# 

Bug#1060297: acmetool's systemd timer is stopped when the package is upgraded

2024-01-08 Thread Timothy Allen
Package: acmetool
Version: 0.2.2-2+b1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

I installed acmetool a while ago, with the systemd timer unit to keep my
certificates refreshed, and I've generally been very happy with it.
However, sometimes Let's Encrypt emails me that my certificates are
about to expire, and when I check, the systemd timer unit is stopped,
and I have been unable to figure out why.

Today there was an updated acmetool package, and I caught it in the act.

Before I ran "apt upgrade", acmetool was scheduled:

```
$ sudo systemctl list-timers --all
NEXT LEFT LAST  PASSED UNIT
   --- 
--
Tue 2024-01-09 12:27:46 AEDT 1h 18min Tue 2024-01-09 00:21:01 AEDT 10h ago 
acmetool.timer
```

I then ran "apt upgrade", which completed successfully without errors or
warnings. Suddenly, the timer unit had been deactivated:

```
$ sudo systemctl list-timers --all
NEXT   LEFT LAST  PASSED UNIT
 --  --- --
- - Tue 2024-01-09 00:21:01 AEDT 10h ago acmetool.timer
```

And sure enough, although the unit was still loaded and "enabled" (which
I understand means "automatically activated") it was now inactive:

```
$ sudo systemctl status acmetool.timer
○ acmetool.timer - Reconcile Let's Encrypt certificates twice daily
 Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/acmetool.timer; enabled; preset: 
enabled)
 Active: inactive (dead) since Tue 2024-01-09 11:09:26 AEDT; 1min 59s ago
   Duration: 3d 22h 57min 44.320s
Trigger: n/a
   Triggers: ● acmetool.service

Jan 05 12:11:41 boombah systemd[1]: Started acmetool.timer - Reconcile Let's 
Encrypt certificates twice daily.
Jan 09 11:09:26 boombah systemd[1]: acmetool.timer: Deactivated successfully.
Jan 09 11:09:26 boombah systemd[1]: Stopped acmetool.timer - Reconcile Let's 
Encrypt certificates twice daily.
```

I'm open to the possibility that I have somehow misconfigured systemd in
a way that causes this unit (and no others) to be deactivated, but I did
follow the instructions in the README.Debian.gz file to set it up.

Thank you for packaging such a useful tool!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.4.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages acmetool depends on:
ii  libc62.37-13
ii  libcap2  1:2.66-4+b2

Versions of packages acmetool recommends:
ii  dialog  1.3-20231002-1

acmetool suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


Bug#1060296: virt-v2v: Wrong dependency on nbdkit-pthon-plugin

2024-01-08 Thread Santiago Ruano Rincón
Package: virt-v2v
Version: 2.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: Lee Garrett 

Dear maintainer,

virt-v2v 2.4.0-1 is not installable since it depends on a wrongly listed
package: nbdkit-python-plugin. The correct name is nbdkit-plugin-python.

I also suggests nbdkit-vddk-plugin, that doesn't exist.

I am preparing a MR that includes this fix. But the following simple
change solves the issue:

diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 313dba7..08de83e 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Architecture: any
 Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends},
  libnbd-bin,
  nbdkit,
- nbdkit-python-plugin,
+ nbdkit-plugin-python,
  qemu-utils,
 Suggests: rhsrvany, nbdkit-vddk-plugin


-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers stable-security
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 
'oldstable-security'), (500, 'oldoldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldoldstable'), 
(500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.5.0-5-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages virt-v2v depends on:
ii  libc62.37-13
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.78.3-1
ii  libguestfs0  1:1.50.1-4+b3
ii  libjansson4  2.14-2
ii  libnbd0  1.18.1-1
ii  libosinfo-1.0-0  1.11.0-2
ii  libpcre2-8-0 10.42-4
ii  libvirt0 9.10.0-1
ii  libxml2  2.9.14+dfsg-1.3+b1

virt-v2v recommends no packages.

virt-v2v suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1060295: boost1.83: not have sufficient long double support issue on ppc64le

2024-01-08 Thread Jerome Georges Benoit
Source: boost1.83
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: calcu...@rezozer.net

Dear Maintainer,

it appears that the current graph-tool package (version 2.59+ds-1) fails
to build on ppc64le arch because a `static assertion (fails)`.
The message from the compiler is:

  /usr/include/boost/math/tools/promotion.hpp:267:27: error: static assertion 
failed: \
  Sorry, but this platform does not have sufficient long double support for the 
special \
  functions to be reliably implemented.

Best,
Jerome

System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: ppc64el (ppc64le)

Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-27-powerpc64le (SMP w/4 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: unable to detect



Bug#1057498: Additional information

2024-01-08 Thread Vladimir Petko
Control: retitle 1057498 cryptacular: FTBFS with bouncycastle 1.72
Control: usertag 1057498 -default-java21

Dear Maintainers,

 The issue with ftbfs was caused by the API changes in bouncycastle 1.72.
 There are no Java 21 specific changes needed.

  Would it be possible to consider a merge request[1] that addresses this issue?

Best Regards,
 Vladimir.

 [1] https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/cryptacular/-/merge_requests/1



Bug#1057497: Additional information

2024-01-08 Thread Vladimir Petko
Dear Maintainers,

  Would it be possible to consider a merge request[1] that addresses this issue?

Best Regards,
 Vladimir.

 [1] https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/commons-pool/-/merge_requests/2



Bug#1051018: spectrwm: please set XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP and use it to configure xdg-desktop-portal

2024-01-08 Thread Andrea Bolognani
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 12:06:40PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Package: spectrwm
> Version: 3.4.1-3
> Severity: normal
> User: xdg-desktop-por...@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: portals.conf

Hi Simon,

apologies for taking a while to get back to you. I'm actively looking
into this now.

> Suggested fix
> =
> 
> Add a sequence of semicolon-separated desktop environment names to
> /usr/share/xsessions/spectrwm.desktop, most likely just "spectrwm":
> 
> DesktopNames=spectrwm;

This makes perfect sense, and would also be totally suitable for
upstream, where spectrwm.desktop already lives. I'll prepare a patch
and propose it there.

Just out of curiosity, is there any advantage to having the trailing
semicolon in this case? We only have a single item in the list after
all.

> And then create a /usr/share/xdg-desktop-portal/spectrwm-portals.conf
> with whatever portal backends are desired for a spectrwm session,
> for example perhaps this:
> 
> [preferred]
> default=gtk;

This feels more suitable for a downstream patch, would you agree?

Gtk is probably the most reasonable choice: not only it matches the
existing default, but it's also somewhat more lightweight in that it
doesn't drag in a dozen libraries like the KDE implementation does.

Honestly, neither quite fits with spectrwm's aesthetic... We'd
probably want an old school, unthemed Gtk 2 implementation or
something like that. Shame it doesn't seem to exist. Oh well :)


By the way, while playing around with this to understand how the
various pieces fit together I noticed that there seems to be a
significant amount of caching going on.

By this I mean that I have configured spectrwm to prefer Gtk and
WindowMaker to prefer KDE, and after using one of the two, logging
out and switching to the other one doesn't seems to be enough to get
the other implementation to run: I have to reboot the machine, or at
the very least kill all user processes even remotely related to the
desktop portal.

Is this expected? It certainly took me a bit to wrap my head around
it, but I guess it's fine as long as users don't constantly hop
between different sessions...

-- 
Andrea Bolognani 
Resistance is futile, you will be garbage collected.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1060294: python-cryptography: Please update for rust-pem 1.1

2024-01-08 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: python-cryptography
Version: 41.0.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-CC: kapo...@melix.org

rust-pem 1.1 is now in Debian Unstable. Please drop the rust-pem 1.0
patch and update Build-Depends to build with this new version.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1060236: openjdk-8 adds zero build for loong64

2024-01-08 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi,

>I hope this email finds you well. We would like to add openjdk-8 zero
>build support for loong64.

thank you, queued (in the next days there will be an update of that
anyway).

Why do you disable pulse? Does it not work? Or is it just because
libpulse-dev was not available until yesterday? Or did something
(like icedtea-sound) not build?

Thanks,
//mirabilos
-- 
I believe no one can invent an algorithm. One just happens to hit upon it
when God enlightens him. Or only God invents algorithms, we merely copy them.
If you don't believe in God, just consider God as Nature if you won't deny
existence.  -- Coywolf Qi Hunt



Bug#1059694: filezilla 3.63.0-1+deb12u3 flagged for acceptance

2024-01-08 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
package release.debian.org
tags 1059694 = bookworm pending
thanks

Hi,

The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into 
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm.

Thanks for your contribution!

Upload details
==

Package: filezilla
Version: 3.63.0-1+deb12u3

Explanation: prevent 'Terrapin' exploit [CVE-2023-48795]



Bug#1059693: filezilla 3.52.2-3+deb11u1 flagged for acceptance

2024-01-08 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
package release.debian.org
tags 1059693 = bullseye pending
thanks

Hi,

The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into 
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye.

Thanks for your contribution!

Upload details
==

Package: filezilla
Version: 3.52.2-3+deb11u1

Explanation: prevent 'Terrapin' exploit [CVE-2023-48795]



Bug#1060209: [Debian-iot-maintainers] Bug#1060209: libopenzwave1.6 install hundreds of data files and images in /etc

2024-01-08 Thread Nicolas Mora

Hello,

Le 2024-01-07 à 10 h 42, Gioele Barabucci a écrit :


libopenzwave1.6 currently installs 1489 in /etc, including 635 PNG 
images, 9 JPEG images, and 1 Zip file.


These files are obviously not conffiles but are treated as such.

Could they be moved under /usr, for example under /usr/share/openzwave?

I suggest instead not to install images or zip files, they are not 
relevant I think.


I've updated the package in salsa with other changes, I'll run some 
tests on my own to make sure it works fine with my use cases. If all 
good, I'll upload the fixed package later then.


/Nicolas



Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 09:17:52PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Steve,

> On 05-01-2024 17:36, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Also a problem is that experimental also might already contain totally
> > unrelated updates like new upstream versions...

> I share this worry. Have you thought about how to handle the cases where you
> don't have experimental to upload to? How big is this problem?

> Another worry, how will you provide the required changes to the maintainers
> of the packages? Via BTS? For those working on salsa: MR? Both? Something
> else? Obviously we should not end in the situation that a new upload goes
> back to the old name (or are the ftp-masters so keen on this transition that
> that won't happen? But what about newer versions with the old name already
> in experimental, conform the former worry?). I've seen NMU's being ignored
> by subsequent uploads by the maintainer, even when they fixed RC issues
> which were then reintroduced.

I would intend to provide diffs via the BTS.  This remains the standard
policy for NMUs in Debian per the Developer's Reference, and as far as I
know has worked effectively for all such previous ABI transitions.

I think it is reasonable to expect maintainers to pay attention to their bug
mail as our defined Debian process.  I don't think it would be reasonable to
expect people working on cross-archive toolchain transitions to cater to
individual maintainer preference in this regard.

If a maintainer ignores the NMU and drops the rename, they'll be introducing
a new library transition again on 32-bit archs.  Won't they also be caught
again in binary NEW, for those packages that don't have the same runtime
library package name in experimental?  It seems to me there's ample
opportunity to catch such mistakes if they happen.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer   https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1060292: Flash-kernel add Sipeed Lichee Pi 4A - merge request

2024-01-08 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt

Merge request:

https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/flash-kernel/-/merge_requests/54



Bug#1060293: gnome-nettool: Aborts with assert failure: *** stack smashing detected ***

2024-01-08 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Package: gnome-nettool
Version: 42.0-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: sudipm.mukher...@gmail.com

Dear Maintainer,

gnome-nettool crashes with the message "assert failure: *** stack smashing 
detected ***".

Steps to reproduce:
1. Open gnome-nettool
2. Select the lookup tab
3. Enter "codethink.co.uk" in the space for Network address.
4. In the information type dropdown menu select "Any / All Information"
5. Click the "Lookup" button.

Note:
Other options in the "information type dropdown menu" works without any error.
The issue is seen only with "Any / All Information".


-- 
Regards
Sudip



Bug#1060274: RFS: python-acora/2.4-1.1 [NMU] [RC] -- fast multi-keyword text search engine (Python 2)

2024-01-08 Thread Bo YU
Hi,

On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 5:15 AM Bastian Germann  wrote:
>
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 23:13:52 +0800 Bo YU  wrote:
> >  python-acora (2.4-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
> >  .
> >* Non-maintainer upload.
> >* New upstream version 2.4. (Closes: #1056849, #1055707).
> >* Remove python2 on B-D and pybuild.
> >* Add extend-diff-ignore to fix dpkg-source -b check issue.
>
> Please check the archive before posting NMUs based on old versions.
I guess the problem was raised by not pushing the update to the slasa
repo with before several times NMUs. I just the do NMUs based on salsa
repo.

> Also, a new upstream version needs the NMU revision -0.1, not -1.1.
Okak, thanks for reminding me.

BR,
bo
>



Bug#1060292: Flash-kernel add Sipeed Lichee Pi 4A

2024-01-08 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt

Package: flash-kernel
Version: 3.107
Severity: wishlist

Please, add the Sipeed Lichee Pi 4A to the database:

Machine: Sipeed Lichee Pi 4A
Kernel-Flavors: any
Boot-Script-Path: /boot/boot.scr
DTB-Id: thead/th1520-lichee-pi-4a.dtb
Boot-Script-Path: /boot/boot.scr
U-Boot-Script-Name: bootscr.uboot-generic
Required-Packages: u-boot-tools

Best regards

Heinrich



Bug#1060233: libc6: Missing libdl.so

2024-01-08 Thread Paul Szabo
Dear Aurelien,

Thanks for the help. Please close this bug report.

Thanks, Paul
-- 
Paul Szabo   p...@maths.usyd.edu.au   www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz
School of Mathematics and Statistics   University of SydneyAustralia

Join the Union and fight for a better University: www.nteu.au/join



Bug#1055955: transition: perl 5.38

2024-01-08 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed

On 2024-01-09 00:08:09 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 01:15:26PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 08:28:01PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > 
> > > this has taken me much longer than necessary for various reasons, but I
> > > think we're almost ready to push Perl 5.38 to sid now.
> > 
> > >   
> > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=perl-5.38-transition;users=debian-p...@lists.debian.org
> 
> > I think we're as ready as can reasonably be, assuming you're OK with the
> > above testing removals. Please let me know when a suitable transition
> > slot becomes available.
> 
> Hi, gentle ping on this?

Please go ahead.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher



Bug#1060291: ITP: python-nh3 -- Python bindings to the ammonia HTML sanitization library.

2024-01-08 Thread Alexandre Detiste
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexandre Detiste 
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org

* Package name: python-nh3
  Version : 0.2.15
  Upstream Contact: 
* URL : https://github.com/messense/nh3
* License : MIT
  Programming Lang: Pytthon
  Description : Python bindings to the ammonia HTML sanitization library.


 NH3 is an HTML sanitizing library that escapes or strips markup and
 attributes based on a white list. NH3 can also linkify text safely,
 applying filters that Django's urlize filter cannot, and optionally setting
 rel attributes, even on links already in the text.
 .
 NH3 is intended for sanitizing text from untrusted sources. If you find
 yourself jumping through hoops to allow your site administrators to do lots of
 things, you're probably outside the use cases. Either trust those users, or
 don't.



Bleach is deprecated, NH3 is seen a valid successor.

NH3 is neead to package the latest version of 'python-readme-renderer'

https://github.com/mozilla/bleach/issues/698

https://daniel.feldroy.com/posts/2023-06-converting-from-bleach-to-nh3



Bug#1059891: linux-image-6.1.0-17-amd64: netfilter (nftables) breaks since bookworm

2024-01-08 Thread Daniel Haryo Sugondo

Hi,

thank you for your answer.

On 1/5/24 20:18, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 07:35:23AM +0100, Daniel Haryo Sugondo wrote:

Package: src:linux
Version: 6.1.69-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

since Debian 12 (Bookworm) the nft with named set ends with kernel trace and the
nft stalled (D)
# ps aux
root   82373  0.0  0.0  0 0 ?DJan02   0:00 [nft]

The message looks like:
[ 3566.525419] [ cut here ]
[ 3566.525424] kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:419!
[ 3566.529834] invalid opcode:  [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
[ 3566.535474] CPU: 19 PID: 8146 Comm: kworker/19:0 Not tainted 6.1.0-17-amd64 
#1  Debian 6.1.69-1
[ 3566.545182] Hardware name:  /0X3D66, BIOS 2.2.2 01/16/2014
[ 3566.551304] Workqueue: events nf_tables_trans_destroy_work [nf_tables]
[ 3566.558609] RIP: 0010:__slab_free+0x118/0x2d0
[ 3566.563474] Code: 74 35 49 8b 06 48 89 4c 24 20 48 c1 e8 36 4c 8b a4 c3 d8 00 00 
00 4c 89 e7 e8 74 6a 71 00 48 8b 4c 24 20 48 89 44 24 18 eb 8f <0f> 0b f7 43 08 
00 0d 21 00 75 cd eb c6 80 4c 24 53 80 e9 75 ff ff
[ 3566.584431] RSP: 0018:a76066effdb0 EFLAGS: 00010246
[ 3566.590262] RAX: 95430ba21930 RBX: 952b80043300 RCX: 802a001a
[ 3566.598223] RDX: a76066effdd8 RSI: eed9a22e8840 RDI: a76066effe18
[ 3566.606189] RBP: 95430ba21900 R08: 0001 R09: c0d89ecc
[ 3566.614152] R10: 0013 R11: 0001 R12: a76066effe50
[ 3566.622114] R13: 95430ba21900 R14: eed9a22e8840 R15: 95430ba21900
[ 3566.630079] FS:  () GS:955a9fa4() 
knlGS:
[ 3566.639107] CS:  0010 DS:  ES:  CR0: 80050033
[ 3566.645518] CR2: 7f255e9eb3d8 CR3: 002a6d410006 CR4: 001706e0
[ 3566.653479] Call Trace:
[ 3566.656210]  
[ 3566.658552]  ? __die_body.cold+0x1a/0x1f
[ 3566.662928]  ? die+0x2a/0x50
[ 3566.666144]  ? do_trap+0xc5/0x110
[ 3566.669848]  ? __slab_free+0x118/0x2d0
[ 3566.674029]  ? do_error_trap+0x6a/0x90
[ 3566.678211]  ? __slab_free+0x118/0x2d0
[ 3566.682393]  ? exc_invalid_op+0x4c/0x60
[ 3566.686676]  ? __slab_free+0x118/0x2d0
[ 3566.690857]  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
[ 3566.695529]  ? nf_tables_trans_destroy_work+0x1cc/0x250 [nf_tables]
[ 3566.702532]  ? __slab_free+0x118/0x2d0
[ 3566.706714]  ? obj_cgroup_uncharge_pages+0xd0/0xd0
[ 3566.712066]  nf_tables_trans_destroy_work+0x1cc/0x250 [nf_tables]
[ 3566.718874]  process_one_work+0x1c7/0x380
[ 3566.723351]  worker_thread+0x4d/0x380
[ 3566.727436]  ? rescuer_thread+0x3a0/0x3a0
[ 3566.731908]  kthread+0xda/0x100
[ 3566.735417]  ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
[ 3566.740763]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[ 3566.744759]  
[ 3566.747195] Modules linked in: xt_conntrack xt_MASQUERADE 
nf_conntrack_netlink xfrm_user xfrm_algo xt_addrtype nft_compat br_netfilter 
bridge 8021q garp stp mrp llc overlay bonding tls nft_nat nft_chain_nat nf_nat 
nft_log qrtr nft_limit nft_ct nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 
nf_tables libcrc32c nfnetlink_log nfnetlink binfmt_misc intel_rapl_msr 
intel_rapl_common sb_edac x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp nls_ascii 
nls_cp437 coretemp kvm_intel vfat fat kvm ipmi_ssif irqbypass 
ghash_clmulni_intel sha512_ssse3 sha512_generic sha256_ssse3 sha1_ssse3 
aesni_intel crypto_simd cryptd ipmi_si iTCO_wdt rapl intel_pmc_bxt ipmi_devintf 
joydev intel_cstate iTCO_vendor_support ipmi_msghandler sg acpi_power_meter 
watchdog intel_uncore mei_me mei pcspkr evdev parport_pc ppdev lp parport 
efi_pstore dm_mod fuse loop configfs efivarfs ip_tables x_tables autofs4 ext4 
crc16 mbcache jbd2 crc32c_generic hid_generic usbhid hid sr_mod cdrom sd_mod 
t10_pi crc64_rocksoft crc64 crc_t10dif
[ 3566.747268]  crct10dif_generic mgag200 i2c_algo_bit drm_shmem_helper ahci 
drm_kms_helper libahci ehci_pci ehci_hcd libata crct10dif_pclmul megaraid_sas 
drm crct10dif_common crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel usbcore tg3 scsi_mod lpc_ich 
libphy usb_common scsi_common wmi button
[ 3566.870202] ---[ end trace  ]---
[ 3566.878075] RIP: 0010:__slab_free+0x118/0x2d0
[ 3566.882954] Code: 74 35 49 8b 06 48 89 4c 24 20 48 c1 e8 36 4c 8b a4 c3 d8 00 00 
00 4c 89 e7 e8 74 6a 71 00 48 8b 4c 24 20 48 89 44 24 18 eb 8f <0f> 0b f7 43 08 
00 0d 21 00 75 cd eb c6 80 4c 24 53 80 e9 75 ff ff
[ 3566.903925] RSP: 0018:a76066effdb0 EFLAGS: 00010246
[ 3566.909772] RAX: 95430ba21930 RBX: 952b80043300 RCX: 802a001a
[ 3566.917752] RDX: a76066effdd8 RSI: eed9a22e8840 RDI: a76066effe18
[ 3566.925747] RBP: 95430ba21900 R08: 0001 R09: c0d89ecc
[ 3566.933714] R10: 0013 R11: 0001 R12: a76066effe50
[ 3566.941694] R13: 95430ba21900 R14: eed9a22e8840 R15: 95430ba21900
[ 3566.949670] FS:  () GS:955a9fa4() 
knlGS:
[ 3566.958717] CS:  0010 DS:  ES:  CR0: 80050033
[ 3566.965144] CR2: 

Bug#1060290: bullseye-pu: package django-mailman3/1.3.5-2

2024-01-08 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Hello,

Some users brought to my attention that in bullseye, django-mailman3
doesn't scrub messages properly before passing them to any archiver, and
therefore some messages are not archived.

This PU patches django-mailman3 so that it processes messages having a
null-byte in their body properly.

[ Reason ]
The bug probably has existed all the time before the patch made upstream
there:
https://gitlab.com/mailman/django-mailman3/-/commit/5bc1f6e8ca4d95ea4e2be861821cb17f168f8d1b?merge_request_iid=121

[ Impact ]
Messages received by mailman3 might not be archived properly archived.

[ Tests ]
Tests were designed upstream, but require binary files to be added to
the code, which can't be done through a quilt patch, so I have not
included the tests.

[ Risks ]
The patch works properly. Should a bug arise due to the new code,
archiving would be broken.

[ Checklist ]
  [x] *all* changes are documented in the d/changelog
  [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  [x] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable
  [x] the issue is verified as fixed in unstable

[ Changes ]
Explicit replacement of nullbyte characters by '' in a message body when
scrubbing.
dpkg-source: avertissement: extraction d'un paquet source non signé 
(/home/peb/git/debian/mailman-team/django-mailman3/django-mailman3_1.3.5-2.dsc)
dpkg-source: avertissement: extraction d'un paquet source non signé 
(/home/peb/git/debian/mailman-team/django-mailman3/django-mailman3_1.3.5-2+deb11u1.dsc)
diff -Nru django-mailman3-1.3.5/debian/changelog 
django-mailman3-1.3.5/debian/changelog
--- django-mailman3-1.3.5/debian/changelog  2021-03-04 00:23:46.0 
+0100
+++ django-mailman3-1.3.5/debian/changelog  2024-01-08 22:32:29.0 
+0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+django-mailman3 (1.3.5-2+deb11u1) bullseye; urgency=medium
+
+  * d/p/0001: Fix archiving issues due to nullbytes in message body
+(Closes: #1033256)
+
+ -- Pierre-Elliott Bécue   Mon, 08 Jan 2024 22:32:29 +0100
+
 django-mailman3 (1.3.5-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Compile django LC messages at build time
diff -Nru 
django-mailman3-1.3.5/debian/patches/0001-Scrubber-now-removes-null-bytes-from-the-scrubbed-me.patch
 
django-mailman3-1.3.5/debian/patches/0001-Scrubber-now-removes-null-bytes-from-the-scrubbed-me.patch
--- 
django-mailman3-1.3.5/debian/patches/0001-Scrubber-now-removes-null-bytes-from-the-scrubbed-me.patch
1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ 
django-mailman3-1.3.5/debian/patches/0001-Scrubber-now-removes-null-bytes-from-the-scrubbed-me.patch
2024-01-08 22:32:29.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+From: =?utf-8?q?Pierre-Elliott_B=C3=A9cue?= 
+Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 22:40:38 +0100
+Subject: Scrubber now removes null bytes from the scrubbed message body.
+
+---
+ README.rst   |   1 +
+ django_mailman3/lib/scrub.py |   5 -
+ 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+diff --git a/README.rst b/README.rst
+index 775b158..98264be 100644
+--- a/README.rst
 b/README.rst
+@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ NEWS
+ * Add a new method get_django_user to return Django User model. (See !99)
+ * Add ``delete_archives`` field to ``mailinglist_deleted`` Signal.
+ * Replaced deprecated ``ugettexy_lazy`` with ``gettext_lazy``. (Closes #37)
++* Scrubber now removes null bytes from the scrubbed message body.
+ 
+ 
+ 1.3.4 (2020-06-05)
+diff --git a/django_mailman3/lib/scrub.py b/django_mailman3/lib/scrub.py
+index f35761b..2be66c9 100644
+--- a/django_mailman3/lib/scrub.py
 b/django_mailman3/lib/scrub.py
+@@ -248,6 +248,8 @@ class Scrubber():
+ next_part_match = NEXT_PART.search(result)
+ if next_part_match:
+ result = result[0:next_part_match.start(0)]
++# MAS Remove any null butes from the result.
++result = re.sub('\x00', '', result)
+ return result
+ 
+ def _get_text(self):
+@@ -276,6 +278,7 @@ class Scrubber():
+ if not part_content.endswith('\n'):
+ part_content += '\n'
+ text.append(part_content)
+-return '\n'.join(text)
++# MAS remove any null bytes from the text.
++return re.sub('\x00', '', '\n'.join(text))
+ else:
+ return self._get_text_one_part(self.msg)
diff -Nru django-mailman3-1.3.5/debian/patches/series 
django-mailman3-1.3.5/debian/patches/series
--- django-mailman3-1.3.5/debian/patches/series 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 
+0100
+++ django-mailman3-1.3.5/debian/patches/series 2024-01-08 22:32:29.0 
+0100
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+0001-Scrubber-now-removes-null-bytes-from-the-scrubbed-me.patch


Bug#1058106: python-ml-collections: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'imp'

2024-01-08 Thread Yogeswaran Umasankar

Hi,
Made a patch to fix the ModuleNotFoundError with Py 3.12. Attaching the
debdiff file.
Cheers!
diff -Nru python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/changelog 
python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/changelog
--- python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/changelog2023-04-01 
05:59:28.0 +
+++ python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/changelog2024-01-08 
20:00:00.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+python-ml-collections (0.1.1-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+  * Team upload.
+  * Included a patch for ml_collections/config_flags/config_flags.py
+to replace deprecated imp with importlib to fix ModuleNotFoundError
+in Python 3.12. (Closes: #1058106)
+  * Added python3-absl, python3-contextlib2, python3-yaml to test-deps.
+
+ -- Yogeswaran Umasankar   Mon, 08 Jan 2024 20:00:00 +
+
 python-ml-collections (0.1.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Team Upload.
diff -Nru 
python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/patches/002_imp-module-replacement.patch 
python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/patches/002_imp-module-replacement.patch
--- python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/patches/002_imp-module-replacement.patch 
1970-01-01 00:00:00.0 +
+++ python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/patches/002_imp-module-replacement.patch 
2024-01-08 20:00:00.0 +
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+Description: Implemented importlib to fix ModuleNotFoundError with Python 3.12.
+Author: Yogeswaran Umasankar 
+Last-Update: 2024-01-08
+
+--- a/ml_collections/config_flags/config_flags.py
 b/ml_collections/config_flags/config_flags.py
+@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
+ """Configuration commmand line parser."""
+ 
+ import errno
+-import imp
++import importlib
+ import os
+ import re
+ import sys
+@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ def _LoadConfigModule(name: str, path: s
+ 
+   # Works for relative paths.
+   with ignoring_errors.Attempt('Relative path', path):
+-config_module = imp.load_source(name, path)
++config_module = importlib.load_source(name, path)
+ return config_module
+ 
+   # Nothing worked. Log the paths that were attempted.
diff -Nru python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/patches/series 
python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/patches/series
--- python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/patches/series   2023-04-01 
05:50:43.0 +
+++ python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/patches/series   2024-01-08 
20:00:00.0 +
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 noRequirements.patch
+002_imp-module-replacement.patch
diff -Nru python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/tests/control 
python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/tests/control
--- python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/tests/control2023-04-01 
05:56:46.0 +
+++ python-ml-collections-0.1.1/debian/tests/control2024-01-08 
20:00:00.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 Tests: run-unit-test
-Depends: @, bazel-bootstrap, python3-mock, python-is-python3
+Depends: @, bazel-bootstrap, python3-mock, python-is-python3, python3-absl, 
python3-contextlib2, python3-yaml
 Restrictions: allow-stderr, skip-not-installable


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1057495: ca-certificates-java: FTBFS with default Java 21

2024-01-08 Thread Vladimir Petko
Dear Maintainers,

  Would it be possible to consider a merge request[1] that addresses this issue?

Best Regards,
 Vladimir.

 [1] https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/ca-certificates-java/-/merge_requests/11



Bug#1060289: linphone: why are there ringtones in mkv encapsulated opus and the only thing it is able to use are wav files?

2024-01-08 Thread Mr. T

Package: linphone
Version: 4.2.5-3
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@treaki.tk

Dear Maintainer,

i tried to change the ringtone, because the default one was a big basic,
i tried those wich are also there at /usr/share/sounds/linphone/rings
but the only one tht worked was the default one

i assumed that the one there would work, there where no error message
but it wasnt ringing anymore eiterh. So i tryed to convert one of them
using ffmpeg, to mp3 and opus (without some mkv container) but both
didnt work, only thing that worked was converting it to microsoft .wav
file so, strage i guess that it didnt work with anything else then the
most basic audio file and the one provided with are more elaborated then
anything normally there, i mean opus on its own is high but then also in
an matroska container. At least i guess it should support de facto
standarts like an basic mp3 files..

please fix that and if you cant, just convert those mkv files to wav

thanks and keep up the good work


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.8
APT prefers oldstable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldstable-security'), 
(500, 'oldstable')

Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-26-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE 
not set

Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages linphone depends on:
ii linphone-desktop 4.2.5-3

linphone recommends no packages.

linphone suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



Bug#1060246: perl: proposed patch for perl ABI change due to 64-bit time_t

2024-01-08 Thread Niko Tyni
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 12:35:32AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Package: perl
> Version: 5.36.0-10
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
> User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
> Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
> 
> Hi Niko, Dominic,
> 
> Please find attached a prospective patch for perl that would annotate the
> perlapi provides for perl-base after a 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit
> architectures, on perl 5.36.0.  I've tested that this does what's expected,
> both for the Provides: of perl-base and the behavior of dh_perl.

Thanks! Glad the perlabi thing is still working. It hasn't had much use.

> It tries to retain compatibility with perlapi-5.36.0 on architectures where
> this is appropriate (64-bit architectures + i386); it covers Debian release
> architectures + riscv64, but does not attempt to be complete for all
> architectures dpkg knows about.

Is there a reason you're bumping the abi for all the architectures rather
than just the affected ones? I'd expect this to be "opt in" so perlabi
would be defined just for armhf, hppa and so forth.

I'm thinking something like what we did for the s390x jmp_buf thing

  ifeq (s390x-linux-gnu,$(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE))
  perlabi = 5.18.2d
  else
  perlabi =
  endif

as per 
https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/interpreter/perl/-/commit/a66f196c13108b04909f9ec0e05986983cb2ed19

> This is entirely optional anyway, as perl
> 5.38 is just around the corner, at which point this patch should be dropped
> completely (assuming time_t lands before perl 5.38 does).

TBH I was hoping 5.38 would land first :) I'm just waiting for a
transition slot. (Hm, it's been a month now, guess I should ping the bug.)

OOC, have you got the perl test suite passing with time64? I just did
a quick try on i386 with just DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=abi=+time64 and I'm
seeing 

Failed 7 tests out of 2623, 99.73% okay.
../cpan/DB_File/t/db-btree.t
../cpan/DB_File/t/db-hash.t
../cpan/DB_File/t/db-recno.t
../cpan/DB_File/t/db-threads.t
../cpan/Memoize/t/errors.t
../cpan/Memoize/t/tie.t
porting/libperl.t

but I guess that's because things like libdb5.3 need to be rebuilt first?

-- 
Niko



Bug#1055955: transition: perl 5.38

2024-01-08 Thread Niko Tyni
On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 01:15:26PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 08:28:01PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> 
> > this has taken me much longer than necessary for various reasons, but I
> > think we're almost ready to push Perl 5.38 to sid now.
> 
> >   
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=perl-5.38-transition;users=debian-p...@lists.debian.org

> I think we're as ready as can reasonably be, assuming you're OK with the
> above testing removals. Please let me know when a suitable transition
> slot becomes available.

Hi, gentle ping on this?
-- 
Niko



Bug#977177: mm-common: reproducible builds: Generated tarball includes user, group and file mode

2024-01-08 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
Control: found 977177 1.0.6-1

Hi, it seems the changes in the 1.0.5-1.1 NMU were not included in the
most recent upload... would you please consider including them?

live well,
  vagrant

On 2023-12-05, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2023-11-29, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2020-12-12, Simon McVittie wrote:
>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 20:45:09 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> With the patch, I managed to produce a bit-for-bit identical
>> skeletonmm.tar.xz with the patch applied, both in a test environment
>> where the umask was varied, and with a fairly "normal" umask which was
>> bit-for-bit identical to the skeletonmm.tar.xz in the mm-common package
>> in the Debian archive. So it should not cause regressions!
>>
>> With this patch applied, mm-common should become reproducible on
>> tests.reproducible-builds.org infrastructure!
>>
>> Would an upload including this patch be considered soon, or would the
>> maintainers be open to an NMU in the near future?
>
> Uploaded to DELAYED/10 using dgit, debdiff follows:
>
> diff -Nru mm-common-1.0.5/debian/changelog mm-common-1.0.5/debian/changelog
> --- mm-common-1.0.5/debian/changelog  2022-12-15 12:25:29.0 -0800
> +++ mm-common-1.0.5/debian/changelog  2023-12-05 15:03:37.0 -0800
> @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
> +mm-common (1.0.5-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
> +
> +  [ Vagrant Cascadian ]
> +  * Non-maintainer upload.
> +
> +  [ Simon McVittie ]
> +  * util/meson_aux/skeletonmm-tarball.py: Use consistent mode on files in
> +the generated tarball. (Closes: #977177)
> +
> + -- Vagrant Cascadian   Tue, 05 Dec 2023 15:03:37 -0800
> +
>  mm-common (1.0.5-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>  
>[ Jeremy Bicha ]
> diff -Nru mm-common-1.0.5/debian/patches/series 
> mm-common-1.0.5/debian/patches/series
> --- mm-common-1.0.5/debian/patches/series 2022-12-15 12:25:29.0 
> -0800
> +++ mm-common-1.0.5/debian/patches/series 2023-12-05 15:03:37.0 
> -0800
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +utilmeson_auxskeletonmm-tarball.py-use-c.patch
> diff -Nru 
> mm-common-1.0.5/debian/patches/utilmeson_auxskeletonmm-tarball.py-use-c.patch 
> mm-common-1.0.5/debian/patches/utilmeson_auxskeletonmm-tarball.py-use-c.patch
> --- 
> mm-common-1.0.5/debian/patches/utilmeson_auxskeletonmm-tarball.py-use-c.patch 
> 1969-12-31 16:00:00.0 -0800
> +++ 
> mm-common-1.0.5/debian/patches/utilmeson_auxskeletonmm-tarball.py-use-c.patch 
> 2023-12-05 15:03:37.0 -0800
> @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
> +From: Simon McVittie 
> +Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 16:57:13 -0800
> +X-Dgit-Generated: 1.0.5-1.1 77d8a907867d87eb56f57cfd5d3226aba19355d8
> +Subject: util/meson_aux/skeletonmm-tarball.py: Use consistent mode on files 
> in
> +
> +the generated tarball. (Closes: #977177)
> +
> +Signed-off-by: Vagrant Cascadian 
> +
> +---
> +
> +diff --git a/util/meson_aux/skeletonmm-tarball.py 
> b/util/meson_aux/skeletonmm-tarball.py
> +index 138184c..a87590e 100755
> +--- a/util/meson_aux/skeletonmm-tarball.py
>  b/util/meson_aux/skeletonmm-tarball.py
> +@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ import os
> + import sys
> + import shutil
> + import tarfile
> ++import stat
> + 
> + if sys.argv[1] == 'check':
> +   # Called from run_command() during setup or configuration.
> +@@ -42,6 +43,10 @@ else:
> + def reset(tarinfo):
> + tarinfo.uid = tarinfo.gid = 0
> + tarinfo.uname = tarinfo.gname = "root"
> ++if tarinfo.isdir() or (tarinfo.mode & 0o111) != 0:
> ++tarinfo.mode = stat.S_IFMT(tarinfo.mode) | 0o755
> ++else:
> ++tarinfo.mode = stat.S_IFMT(tarinfo.mode) | 0o644
> + return tarinfo
> + 
> + 
>
>
> live well,
>   vagrant


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1050547: Info received (Similar stacktrace for this issue.)

2024-01-08 Thread Mark Bryars
This seems to be the same issue as this one upstream:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/2815

The latest debian update made wayland work for me again, and I found the
accessibility zoom feature was somehow active for my greeter session, some
curious kids may have clicked on things. Turning it off and then disabling
wayland has fixed it for me.

I suspect this might be mitigated for other broken users with:
mv
/var/lib/gdm3/greeter-dconf-defaults /var/lib/gdm3/greeter-dconf-defaults.old

On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 at 23:51, Debian Bug Tracking System <
ow...@bugs.debian.org> wrote:

> Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
> this Bug report.
>
> This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
> has been received.
>
> Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
> interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.
>
> Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
>  Debian GNOME Maintainers 
>
> If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
> send it to 1050...@bugs.debian.org.
>
> Please do not send mail to ow...@bugs.debian.org unless you wish
> to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.
>
> --
> 1050547: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1050547
> Debian Bug Tracking System
> Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
>

>


Bug#1060274: RFS: python-acora/2.4-1.1 [NMU] [RC] -- fast multi-keyword text search engine (Python 2)

2024-01-08 Thread Bastian Germann

Control: tags -1 moreinfo

On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 23:13:52 +0800 Bo YU  wrote:

 python-acora (2.4-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * New upstream version 2.4. (Closes: #1056849, #1055707).
   * Remove python2 on B-D and pybuild.
   * Add extend-diff-ignore to fix dpkg-source -b check issue.


Please check the archive before posting NMUs based on old versions.
Also, a new upstream version needs the NMU revision -0.1, not -1.1.



Bug#1060155: dbus: please usrmerge in unstable

2024-01-08 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: tags -1 + pending

On Sat, 06 Jan 2024 at 15:47:34 +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> I was about to send a patch for dbus to move libdbus into /usr, but
> then noticed it's already done in experimental.
> 
> Do you know about any open blockers to apply this in unstable? If
> not, could I ask you to upload to unstable, please?

No particular blockers, I was just letting it bake in experimental for
a while, since any failure here would break end-user systems quite
extensively (and I particularly didn't want to upload this while on
vacation).

smcv



Bug#1060288: locales: Please allow selection of C.UTF-8 when (re)configuring locales

2024-01-08 Thread Axel Scheepers
Package: locales
Version: 2.36-9+deb12u3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i l10n

Dear Maintainer,

It would be nice to have C.UTF-8 in the list which dpkg-reconfigure locales
shows; When installing a desktop I usually select the C locale since the
others don't really apply and I'm unable to use a different locale setting
for date and lang. This however breaks gnome since it requires a utf-8
locale and I'm unable to select C.UTF-8 at installation.
A workaround is to uncomment the C.UTF-8 locale in /etc/locale.gen
and run dpkg-reconfigure locales after installation.

Kind regards,
Axel Scheepers

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.4
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-17-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages locales depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.82
ii  libc-bin   2.36-9+deb12u3
ii  libc-l10n  2.36-9+deb12u3

locales recommends no packages.

locales suggests no packages.

-- debconf information:
* locales/locales_to_be_generated: C.UTF-8 UTF-8
* locales/default_environment_locale: C.UTF-8



Bug#1059892: qa.debian.org: uscan version too old and not using recent @ANY_VERSION@ expansion

2024-01-08 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi,

Some more info in this IRC discussion

09:15 < adsb> without having checked the specifics, the likely answer is "get a 
newer devscripts into bullseye-backports", I suspect
09:46 < manphiz> adsb: I see.  Would be great to upgrade the server to Bookworm 
to get more newer tools, but I guess that probably requires more work.
09:47 < doge-tech> manphiz: Yep, I was just taking a look at that but as a 
minimum it would require upgrading from postgresql 13 to 16. I may take 
   another look when I've got a bit more time, unless lucas 
already has.
09:47 < doge-tech> Backporting devscripts will be easier and quicker, for sure
09:48 < adsb> well lucas also can't actually do the upgrade :)
09:49 < adsb> but yes, with the DSA hat on installing a single package backport 
is a thing we can easily do. upgrades are still a little less so sadly
09:49 < manphiz> ah db upgrade...
09:52 < doge-tech> Looks like there's already an updated devscripts in 
bullseye-backports-sloppy
09:54 < adsb> presumably from testing
09:54 < adsb> if bookworm's version is sufficient, then that could go to 
bullseye-backports, afair the policies
09:55 < adsb> and ullmann (udd.d.o) will already be configured to support that
09:55 < adsb> -sloppy less so
09:57 < doge-tech> bookworm has 2.23.4, which includes the "v?" check but not 
the "[Vv]?". Still a worthwhile improvement, IMO.
09:58 < adsb> if people care that much then maybe udd actually wants to run a 
local uscan copy. but I'm not a service admin, just a machine one
09:58 < adsb> (there are reasons not to do that as well of course)
10:00 < doge-tech> Not a bad idea. UDD could pull the latest uscan from the 
devscripts repo and use that instead. I'm not an anything admin though 
   (just a guy who's interested), so I'm always happy to be 
shot down. :)
10:02 < doge-tech> There would be a risk to the stability of UDD in doing that, 
of course
10:06 < adsb> well, it's work for lucas, so he might not want to :)

Lucas



Bug#1060222: aide-common: 31_aide_php-fpm defines PHPVERSION 2.2 instead of 8.2

2024-01-08 Thread Marc Haber
Control: tag -1 confirmed

Hi,


On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 09:10:17PM +0100, Frederik Himpe wrote:
> The config file 31_aide_php-fpm defines PHPVERSION as 2.2 instead of 8.2.

thanks for spotting this. Pardon the stupid question, all PHP packages
in a Debian version us the same PHP version, right? Maybe it would be a
good idea to deliver PHPVERSION it its own config snippet just in case
that multiple PHP related rules have to refer to the versioN?

Greetings
Marc

-- 
-
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany|  lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
Nordisch by Nature |  How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421



Bug#1058083: yapsy: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'imp'

2024-01-08 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/tibonihoo/yapsy/issues/18

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Bug#1060275: asterisk: Codec translation notice

2024-01-08 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting List Support via Pkg-voip-maintainers (2024-01-08 19:35:12)
> Le 08/01/2024 à 19:26, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> > If it is possible for you to try test your setup with
> > upstream-distributed Asterisk, then it would help ensure that truly what
> > you experience is a bug introduced by a Debian patch.
> Yes, I have a test asterisk running Debian12+asterisk 20.5.2 compiled 
> from source, I could install a debian upstream Asterisk on it

Sorry, I don't follow.

Are you saying that when you build Debian-distributed Asterisk 20.5.2
the same way as Debian builds it, then this reported problem disappears?

Or are you saying that when you build Debian-distributed Asterisk 20.5.2
somehow omitting to apply any of the Debian patches, then this reported
problem disappears?

Or some other scenario?


Kind regards, and thanks for your help here,

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
 * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

signature.asc
Description: signature


Bug#1060287: awscli: new upstream (2.15.1) available

2024-01-08 Thread Matt Barry
Package: awscli
Version: 2.15.8-1
Severity: important
Tags: newcomer

I would have this as wishlist, but the current version in unstable
(2.14) fails to install because of a versioned dependency on python-
cryptography, is therefore unusable.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 6.6.9-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE,
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages awscli depends on:
ii  groff-base1.23.0-3
ii  python3   3.11.6-1
ii  python3-awscrt0.19.19+dfsg-1
ii  python3-colorama  0.4.6-4
ii  python3-cryptography  41.0.7-1
ii  python3-dateutil  2.8.2-3
ii  python3-distro1.9.0-1
ii  python3-docutils  0.20.1+dfsg-3
ii  python3-jmespath  1.0.1-1
ii  python3-prompt-toolkit3.0.43-1
ii  python3-pyasn10.4.8-4
ii  python3-ruamel.yaml   0.17.21-1
ii  python3-ruamel.yaml.clib  0.2.8-1
ii  python3-urllib3   1.26.18-1

awscli recommends no packages.

awscli suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



Bug#1053128: This is Bug 15170 on bugzilla.samba.org

2024-01-08 Thread Michael Tokarev

Control: found -1 2:4.19.4+dfsg-2
Control: tag -1 + confirmed upstream

On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 20:46:25 +0400 Dmitry Telegin  
wrote:

I found this bug in samba:
Bug 15170 - smbtree seg fault if using -N option.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15170

I checked this error in CentOS Stream 9 (samba 4.18.6-100.el9) -
successfully reproduced.


This is still happening with 4.19.4, fwiw.

/mjt



Bug#1060202: glibc - autopkgtest flacky on arm64

2024-01-08 Thread Paul Gevers


Hi,

On 08-01-2024 01:45, Aurelien Jarno wrote:

I am still not sure why it got killed on arm64 and not on other debci
workers, there as still swap available. Actually looking at the munin
plot, it seems that the arm64 debci workers stopped using swap around
September 2023 contrary to the other architectures.


This does seem to align with us upgrading from the bookworm kernel to 
the backports kernel because of bug 1050256.


That still doesn't explain while the problem with glibc seems to 
have started one week ago.

Indeed, but 4 GB of swap looks like it would help.

Paul


OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1058924: gnome-software: does not list or find any apt package

2024-01-08 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 3:27 PM Patrice Duroux  wrote:
> Nop. Same after a reboot, here are the journalctl messages if it may help:

Could you create a new bug? The original bug is fixed for me on both
Ubuntu 24.04 and Debian Testing (after I installed gnome-software
45.3-2).

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1060286: nextcloud-spreed-signaling: Not able to connect to MCU (payload does not contain a valid sdp)

2024-01-08 Thread Gerald

Package: nextcloud-spreed-signaling
Version: 1.2.2-1~bpo12+1
Severity: normal


Dear Maintainer,

The backports version of nextcloud-spreed-signaling seems not to be able 
to connect to janus-gateway, while the self-built signaling server from 
the same version (1.2.2) works fine.



* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)?
Installation of package (bookworm-backports) and testing the signaling 
server with janus and nats-server, configured as described in the readme.


* What was the outcome of this action?
The nextcloud-spreed-signaling server as packed in the Debian package 
cannot establish connection to MCU.


* What outcome did you expect instead?
Signaling server connecting to janus as MCU.

I tried to set up nextcloud-spreed-signaling server in conjunction with 
janus (1.1.2-1) and nats-server (2.9.10-1).

The configs are as follows:

/etc/janus/janus.transport.websockets.jcfg contains:

general: {
    json = "indented"
    ws = true
    ws_port = 8188
    ws_interface = "lo"
    wss = false
}

and the signaling configuration in 
/etc/nextcloud-spreed-signaling/server.conf


[mcu]
type = janus
url = ws://127.0.0.1:8188

(Same with localhost:8188 as ws url) Janus seems to work as intended. I 
have build nextcloud-spreed-signaling from source of the latest release 
(1.2.2) which is the same version as the packed version. When running 
the self-built signaling server with the same config files the signaling 
server works fine.


When using the signaling server from the Debian (bookworm-backports) 
package and attempting to connect, janus seems to work, reading from the 
logs (when debug logging is turned on):


mcu_janus.go:292: Connected to Janus WebRTC Server 1.1.2 by Meetecho s.r.l.
mcu_janus.go:298: Found JANUS VideoRoom plugin 0.0.9 by Meetecho s.r.l.
mcu_janus.go:303: Data channels are supported mcu_janus.go:307: 
Full-Trickle is enabled

mcu_janus.go:309: Maximum bandwidth 1048576 bits/sec per publishing stream
mcu_janus.go:310: Maximum bandwidth 2097152 bits/sec per screensharing 
stream

mcu_janus.go:316: Created Janus session 6409739776862493
mcu_janus.go:323: Created Janus handle 2619322330759171
main.go:263: Using janus MCU
hub.go:387: Using a timeout of 10s for MCU requests
backend_server.go:98: Using configured TURN API key
backend_server.go:99: Using configured shared TURN secret
...


However, the nextcloud-spreed-signaling server shows not to be able to 
connect:


clientsession.go:281: Permissions of session XY changed: [publish-audio 
publish-video publish-screen control]
hub.go:2161: Session XY sent unsupported offer video, ignoring (payload 
does not contain a valid sdp)

room.go:665: Session joined call XX
hub.go:2193: No MCU publisher found for session XY to send ...


As the self-built signaling server from the same version works fine, I 
suspect there might be an error in the Debian package of the 
nextcloud-spreed-signaling.



Best regards,
Gerald



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.4
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 
'stable')

Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-17-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE 
not set

Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages nextcloud-spreed-signaling depends on:
ii adduser 3.134
ii libc6 2.36-9+deb12u3

Versions of packages nextcloud-spreed-signaling recommends:
ii janus 1.1.2-1
ii nats-server 2.9.10-1+b3

nextcloud-spreed-signaling suggests no packages.

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/nextcloud-spreed-signaling/server.conf changed [not included]

-- no debconf information



Bug#1058924: gnome-software: does not list or find any apt package

2024-01-08 Thread Patrice Duroux
Nop. Same after a reboot, here are the journalctl messages if it may help:

$ journalctl -xe | grep gnome-software
janv. 08 21:19:01 kos-moceratops dbus-daemon[2728]: [session uid=1001
pid=2728] Activating via systemd: service
name='org.freedesktop.portal.Desktop'
unit='xdg-desktop-portal.service' requested by ':1.61' (uid=1001
pid=3467 comm="/usr/bin/gnome-software --gapplication-service")
janv. 08 21:19:03 kos-moceratops dbus-daemon[889]: [system] Activating
via systemd: service name='org.freedesktop.fwupd' unit='fwupd.service'
requested by ':1.109' (uid=1001 pid=3467 comm="/usr/bin/gnome-software
--gapplication-service")
janv. 08 21:19:09 kos-moceratops gnome-software[3467]: Only 0 apps for
recent list, hiding
janv. 08 21:19:09 kos-moceratops gnome-software[3467]: failed to get
featured apps: no apps to show
janv. 08 21:19:09 kos-moceratops gnome-software[3467]: Only 0 apps for
curated list, hiding
janv. 08 21:20:01 kos-moceratops gnome-software[3467]: GtkLabel
0x556a105c2490 (label) reported min width 15 and natural width 14 in
measure() with for_size=57; natural size must be >= min size
janv. 08 21:20:01 kos-moceratops gnome-software[3467]: GtkLabel
0x556a1051f6a0 (label) reported min width 15 and natural width 14 in
measure() with for_size=57; natural size must be >= min size

Le lun. 8 janv. 2024 à 21:06, Jeremy Bícha
 a écrit :
>
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 2:57 PM Patrice Duroux  
> wrote:
> > I do not see any change after the last update on my Sid system.
>
> Please try logging out and logging back in.
>
> Or you could run   pkill gnome-software   and then start the Software app 
> again.
>
> Thank you,
> Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1060233: libc6: Missing libdl.so

2024-01-08 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2024-01-08 12:24, Paul Szabo wrote:
> Dear Aurelien,
> 
> > Starting with glibc 2.34, libdl is an empty library. Therefore only a
> > libdl.a is provided to support linking with -ldl.
> 
> At bullseye, I explicitly needed to use libdl e.g. with constructs like
> 
>   export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/somewhere
>   export LD_PRELOAD='libdl.so gconf_client_get_string.so'
> 
> with code using dlopen() to then replace (modify?) library calls.
> You suggest that there is no longer a need to explicitly preload libdl:
> great, will simplify all my instances. (Until then, the useless symlink
> allows the scripts to work as before.)

It's not clear to me what is this gconf_client_get_string.so and why
libdl.so need to be preloaded before. It could be because
gconf_client_get_string.so is not properly linked.

In any case, that should not be needed anymore, and I guess a try should
confirm that.

> Also: why provide the "empty" libdl.so.2 object, still?

It's empty in the sense it doesn't provide any function, given they have
all been moved to libc.so.6. But some binaries still reference it
because they haven't been rebuilt since the change, and we need to
ensure they still work.

Regards
Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno  GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net



Bug#1060285: mptcpd: FTBFS with a segmentation fault in the testsuite when SCTP disabled and no /etc/protocols

2024-01-08 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Source: mptcpd
Version: 0.12-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs upstream
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: riscv64
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org

Dear maintainer,

On riscv64, mptcpd fails to build from source with a segmentation fault
in the test-mptcpwrap test:

| ===
|mptcpd 0.12: tests/test-suite.log
| ===
| 
| # TOTAL: 19
| # PASS:  17
| # SKIP:  1
| # XFAIL: 0
| # FAIL:  1
| # XPASS: 0
| # ERROR: 0
| 
| .. contents:: :depth: 2
| 
| SKIP: test-start-stop
| =
| 
| Running non-interactive sudo check...
| sudo: a password is required
| fail, skipping the test
| SKIP test-start-stop (exit status: 77)
| 
| FAIL: test-mptcpwrap
| 
| 
| Test case 0: PASS
| Test case 1: Segmentation fault
| FAIL test-mptcpwrap (exit status: 139)

A full build log is available here:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mptcpd=riscv64=0.12-2%2Bb1=1704714971=0

Investigation shows that 3 conditions are needed to trigger this issue:
- A recent kernel that supports mptcp, to be checked with
  /proc/sys/net/mptcp/enabled
- Something that prevents SCTP to be used, for instance on the build
  daemons /proc/sys/kernel/modules_disabled is set to 1, preventing the
  sctp.ko module to be loaded
- A system without /etc/protocols, for instance without the netbase
  package installed.

With this three conditions, this triggers the following code path from
the mptcpwrap-tester.c file:

| static void test_socket_data(struct socket_data const *data)
| {
| int const fd = socket(data->domain, data->type, data->protocol);
| 
| if (fd == -1) {
| if (errno == EPROTONOSUPPORT) {
| struct protoent const *const p =
| getprotobynumber(data->protocol);
| 
| fprintf(stderr,
| "WARNING: Ignoring unsupported "
| "protocol: %d - %s\n",
| data->protocol,
| p->p_name);
| 
| return;
| }

The output of getprotobynumber() is used directly, without checking for
a NULL pointer in case of error, for instance because /etc/protocols
does not exist. This causes a segmentation fault when trying to
dereference it. A workaround is to build-depends on netbase, and a
proper fix to test for this error.

In the latest rebuild of mptpcd, the conditions where met only on the
riscv64 buildd, and riscv64 is not a release architecture. That said a
few mips64el buildds also met the 3 conditions and it will be the case
of more and more buildds once they are upgraded to bookworm. I am
therefore filling this issue as severity serious.

Regards
Aurelien



Bug#744843: john: amd64 fallback binaries

2024-01-08 Thread Alexander Inyukhin
Package: john
Version: 1.9.0-2
Followup-For: Bug #744843
Tags: patch

Dear maintainer!
I've developed a patch that allows the package to generate fallback
binaries during the building process. Could you kindly review and
incorporate this update?
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index 455a0b9..acfb6ab 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ else ifeq ($(CPU),i386)
CFLAGS += -DCPU_FALLBACK
 else ifeq ($(CPU),amd64)
TARGET := $(OS)-x86-64
+   # enabling amd64 fallbacks
+   CFLAGS += -DCPU_FALLBACK
 else ifeq ($(CPU),powerpc)
TARGET := linux-ppc32
 else ifeq ($(CPU),ppc64)
@@ -74,17 +76,13 @@ else
CFLAGS += -DCFG_FULL_NAME=\\\"/etc/john/john.conf\\\"
 endif
 
-# testing i386 for mmx instructions and sse2 extensions
 ifeq ($(CPU),i386)
ifneq ($(OS),hurd)
-   MMX := $(shell grep -c '^flags.* mmx' /proc/cpuinfo)
-   ifneq ($(MMX),0)
-   HAVEMMX := 1
-   endif
-   SSE := $(shell grep -c '^flags.* sse2' /proc/cpuinfo)
-   ifneq ($(SSE),0)
-   HAVESSE := 1
-   endif
+   I386_FALLBACK := 1
+   endif
+else ifeq ($(CPU),amd64)
+   ifneq ($(OS),hurd)
+   X86_64_FALLBACK := 1
endif
 endif
 
@@ -94,17 +92,20 @@ endif
 override_dh_auto_build:
# building the selected target
dh_auto_build -- clean $(TARGET)
-ifeq ($(HAVEMMX),1)
-   # renaming the non-mmx binary
+ifeq ($(I386_FALLBACK),1)
mv run/john run/john-non-mmx
-   # building i386-mmx optimized binary
dh_auto_build -- clean $(OS)-x86-mmx
-endif
-ifeq ($(HAVESSE),1)
-   # renaming the non-sse2 binary
mv run/john run/john-non-sse
-   # building i386-sse2 optimized binary
dh_auto_build -- clean $(OS)-x86-sse2
+else ifeq ($(X86_64_FALLBACK),1)
+   mv run/john run/john-non-avx
+   dh_auto_build -- clean $(OS)-x86-64-avx
+   mv run/john run/john-non-xop
+   dh_auto_build -- clean $(OS)-x86-64-xop
+   mv run/john run/john-non-avx2
+   dh_auto_build -- clean $(OS)-x86-64-avx2
+   mv run/john run/john-non-avx512
+   dh_auto_build -- clean $(OS)-x86-64-avx512
 endif
 
 override_dh_auto_install:
@@ -115,11 +116,14 @@ override_dh_auto_install:
mv -f '{}'.utf8 '{}' \;
 
# install fallbacks as needed
-ifeq ($(HAVEMMX),1)
+ifeq ($(I386_FALLBACK),1)
dh_install run/john-non-mmx /usr/lib/john
-endif
-ifeq ($(HAVESSE),1)
dh_install run/john-non-sse /usr/lib/john
+else ifeq ($(X86_64_FALLBACK),1)
+   dh_install run/john-non-avx /usr/lib/john
+   dh_install run/john-non-xop /usr/lib/john
+   dh_install run/john-non-avx2 /usr/lib/john
+   dh_install run/john-non-avx512 /usr/lib/john
 endif
 
 override_dh_auto_clean:


Bug#1060202: glibc - autopkgtest flacky on arm64

2024-01-08 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2024-01-08 19:50, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 08-01-2024 01:45, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > I am still not sure why it got killed on arm64 and not on other debci
> > workers, there as still swap available. Actually looking at the munin
> > plot, it seems that the arm64 debci workers stopped using swap around
> > September 2023 contrary to the other architectures.
> 
> Can you tell me how you saw that? I neither spotted that, nor is not having
> swap a conscious act, so rather a mistake.

From the log you send, I was surprised that OOM happened while none of
the swap has been used at all. So I looked at the munin link you gave me
by IRC and realized that the Swap in/out plot is stuck as 0.00 for
min/avg/max values since September 2023. This is not the case of the
workers of the other architectures which use a bit of swap from time to
time, and this have a maximum different of 0.00.

That still doesn't explain while the problem with glibc seems to have
started one week ago.

Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno  GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1056380: AW: Bug#1056380: AW: Bug#1056380: Same issue under Ubuntu 22.04, reprepro hangs on Ubuntu package, unzstd process waiting

2024-01-08 Thread Fiehe, Christoph
Yes, of course. The following modification should be enough to solve the 
hanging issue:

--- uncompression.c.orig2024-01-08 21:07:23.0 +0100
+++ uncompression.c 2024-01-08 21:07:52.0 +0100
@@ -1430,7 +1430,7 @@
0
};
unsigned char buffer[4096] = {};
-   while ((e = poll(, 1, 0)) > 0) {
+   while ((e = poll(, 1, -1)) > 0) {
e = read(file->fd, buffer, 4096);
if (e <= 0)
break;

Regards,
Christoph

>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: Bastian Germann 
>Gesendet: Montag, 8. Januar 2024 19:49
>An: Fiehe, Christoph ; 1056...@bugs.debian.org
>Betreff: Re: Bug#1056380: AW: Bug#1056380: Same issue under Ubuntu 22.04, 
>reprepro hangs
>on Ubuntu package, unzstd process waiting
>
>Hi Christoph,
>
>Would you please post your change proposals as patches or Merge Requests?
>That makes it much more easy to review.
>
>Thanks,
>Bastian


Bug#1060284: ITP: laniakea -- Repository management suite for Debian-based OSes

2024-01-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Package: wnpp
Owner: Matthias Klumpp 
Severity: wishlist

 Package name: laniakea
 Version : 0.1
 Upstream Contact: Matthias Klumpp 
 URL : https://github.com/lkhq/laniakea
 License : LGPL-3.0
 Programming Lang: Python
 Description : Repository management suite for Debian-based OSes

Laniakea is a software suite to manage Debian derivatives. It provides
tooling to maintain an APT archive (and multiple individual package
repositories), perform QA on it, autobuild packages, and provides
various tools for better insight into the archive, such as web
applications to view archive details, a Matrix bot and a ZeroMQ-based
message bus to plug in custom tooling.

In order to make this useful as a Debian package, quite a bit of
preparation still has to be done upstream, especially some crucial
parts need better documentation, so the project can be used by people
outside its two original Debian derivatives, Tanglu and PureOS. Having
a package for it will make the project a lot more accessible though.
I expect packaging this to take a while, some dependencies like
Mautrix are not yet in Debian, and JavaScript components are always a
pain (fortunately, Laniakea only has few of those).

Packaging will be maintained at https://salsa.debian.org/laniakea-team/laniakea

Cheers,
Matthias



Bug#1034891: closed by Timo Aaltonen (Re: [Pkg-freeipa-devel] Bug#1034891: 389-ds-base: CVE-2023-1055)

2024-01-08 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi,

On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 07:06:10PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 06:56:40PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > Source: 389-ds-base
> > > Version: 2.3.4+dfsg1-1
> > > 
> > > Moritz Mühlenhoff kirjoitti 26.4.2023 klo 20.43:
> > > > Source: 389-ds-base
> > > > X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org
> > > > Severity: important
> > > > Tags: security
> > > > 
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > The following vulnerability was published for 389-ds-base.
> > > > 
> > > > CVE-2023-1055[0]:
> > > > | A flaw was found in RHDS 11 and RHDS 12. While browsing entries LDAP
> > > > | tries to decode the userPassword attribute instead of the
> > > > | userCertificate attribute which could lead into sensitive information
> > > > | leaked. An attacker with a local account where the cockpit-389-ds is
> > > > | running can list the processes and display the hashed passwords. The
> > > > | highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality.
> > > > 
> > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173517
> > > > 
> > > > If you fix the vulnerability please also make sure to include the
> > > > CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id in your changelog entry.
> > > > 
> > > > For further information see:
> > > > 
> > > > [0] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2023-1055
> > > >  https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1055
> > > > 
> > > > Please adjust the affected versions in the BTS as needed.
> > > 
> > > this was fixed upstream in 2.3.2
> > 
> > Do you have a reference to an upstream issue and/or upstream changes
> > in 2.3.2 which fixes the issue?
> 
> Or is it actually more related to
> https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/5687 which then would be
> in 2.3.5 instead? (and inline with fedora importing 2.3.5 and
> addressing the CVE?)

Looks it is
https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/commit/8483d60de374be78ce3dd423ac7ad7a3cdc5eaca#diff-2cf572ab2e20b5e58a2f66fc7b07b00cd2781cd376aaf52e6d82bb351ed0d0e9L364-L371
in 2.3.3, and first included in 2.3.4+dfsg1-1.

Regards,
Salvatore



Bug#1058083: yapsy: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'imp'

2024-01-08 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Thibauld,

Debian has packaged yapsy.  We try to migrate to Python3.12.  When testing yapsy
with Python3.12 in our CI[1] it fails with:

testActivationAndDeactivation 
(test.test_SimplePlugin.SimpleTestCase.testActivationAndDeactivation)
Test if the activation procedure works. ... Unable to import plugin: 
/builds/python-team/packages/yapsy/debian/output/source_dir/test/plugins/SimplePlugin
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File 
"/builds/python-team/packages/yapsy/debian/output/source_dir/yapsy/PluginManager.py",
 line 518, in loadPlugins
candidate_module = PluginManager._importModule(plugin_module_name, 
candidate_filepath)
   
^^^
  File 
"/builds/python-team/packages/yapsy/debian/output/source_dir/yapsy/PluginManager.py",
 line 584, in _importModule
candidate_module = 
imp.load_module(plugin_module_name,plugin_file,candidate_filepath+".py",("py","r",imp.PY_SOURCE))

 ^
AttributeError: type object 'Loader' has no attribute 'PY_SOURCE'
FAIL
...

You can find the full log in our CI[1].

It would be great if you could port yapsy to Python3.12.

Kind regards
Andreas.


[1] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/yapsy/-/jobs/5132141#L1187

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Bug#1058924: gnome-software: does not list or find any apt package

2024-01-08 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 2:57 PM Patrice Duroux  wrote:
> I do not see any change after the last update on my Sid system.

Please try logging out and logging back in.

Or you could run   pkill gnome-software   and then start the Software app again.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1060283: node-babel7: missing dependency node module '@nicolo-ribaudo/eslint-scope-5-internals'

2024-01-08 Thread Wolfgang Sourdeau
Package: node-babel7
Version: 7.20.15+ds1+~cs214.269.168-6
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,


Using eslint and specifying "@babel/eslint-parser" as parser in the 
configuration, eslint crashes with the following exception :

Error: Failed to load parser '@babel/eslint-parser' declared in 
'../../../.eslintrc': Cannot find module 
'@nicolo-ribaudo/eslint-scope-5-internals'
Require stack:
- /usr/share/nodejs/@babel/eslint-parser/lib/analyze-scope.cjs
- /usr/share/nodejs/@babel/eslint-parser/lib/index.cjs
- /usr/share/nodejs/eslint/lib/cli-engine/config-array-factory.js
- /usr/share/nodejs/eslint/lib/cli-engine/cascading-config-array-factory.js
- /usr/share/nodejs/eslint/lib/cli-engine/cli-engine.js
- /usr/share/nodejs/eslint/lib/cli-engine/index.js
- /usr/share/nodejs/eslint/lib/cli.js
- /usr/share/nodejs/eslint/bin/eslint.js
at Module._resolveFilename (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1134:15)
at Module._load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:975:27)
at Module.require (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1225:19)
at require (/usr/share/nodejs/v8-compile-cache/v8-compile-cache.js:159:20)
at Object. 
(/usr/share/nodejs/@babel/eslint-parser/lib/analyze-scope.cjs:14:5)
at Module._compile 
(/usr/share/nodejs/v8-compile-cache/v8-compile-cache.js:192:30)
at Module._extensions..js (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1414:10)
at Module.load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1197:32)
at Module._load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1013:12)
at Module.require (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1225:19)

This, of course, prevents me from usint "babel" as parser.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 6.6.9-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=fr_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages node-babel7 depends on:
ii  node-ampproject-remapping   2.2.0+~cs5.15.37-1
ii  node-babel-plugin-add-module-exports1.0.4+dfsg1~cs5.8.0-4
ii  node-babel-plugin-polyfill-corejs2  0.3.3~0~20220913+ds1-1
ii  node-babel-plugin-polyfill-corejs3  0.6.0~0~20220913+ds1-1
ii  node-babel-plugin-polyfill-regenerator  0.4.1~0~20220913+ds1-1
ii  node-babel7-runtime 7.20.15+ds1+~cs214.269.168-6
ii  node-browserslist   4.22.1+~cs6.1.27-1
ii  node-chalk  5.3.0-1
ii  node-clone-deep 4.0.1+~cs7.0.2-1
ii  node-commander  9.4.1-1
ii  node-convert-source-map 1.9.0+~1.5.2-1
ii  node-core-js3.33.2-1
ii  node-core-js-compat 3.33.2-1
ii  node-core-js-pure   3.33.2-1
ii  node-debug  4.3.4+~cs4.1.7-1
ii  node-esutils2.0.3+~2.0.0-1
ii  node-find-cache-dir 3.3.2+~3.2.1-1
ii  node-fs-readdir-recursive   1.1.0+~1.1.0-1
ii  node-glob   8.0.3+~cs8.4.15-4
ii  node-globals13.23.0-1
ii  node-js-tokens  8.0.0-2
ii  node-jsesc  3.0.2+~3.0.1-1
ii  node-json5  2.2.3+dfsg-1
ii  node-lodash 4.17.21+dfsg+~cs8.31.198.20210220-9
ii  node-lodash-packages4.17.21+dfsg+~cs8.31.198.20210220-9
ii  node-make-dir   3.1.0-3
ii  node-quick-lru  6.1.1-4
ii  node-regenerator-transform  0.15.2+~0.10.8-1
ii  node-regexpu-core   5.2.2-3
ii  node-resolve1.22.1+~cs5.31.10-1
ii  node-semver 7.5.4+~7.5.0-2
ii  node-slash  4.0.0-3
ii  node-source-map 0.7.0++dfsg2+really.0.6.1-15
ii  node-source-map-support 0.5.21+ds+~0.5.4-1
ii  node-to-fast-properties 3.0.1-3
ii  node-v8flags3.2.0+~3.1.1-1
ii  nodejs  18.19.0+dfsg-6

node-babel7 recommends no packages.

Versions of packages node-babel7 suggests:
pn  node-babel-plugin-polyfill-es-shims  
pn  node-babel7-debug

-- no debconf information



Bug#1058924: gnome-software: does not list or find any apt package

2024-01-08 Thread Patrice Duroux
Package: gnome-software
Version: 45.3-2
Followup-For: Bug #1058924

Dear Maintainer,

I do not see any change after the last update on my Sid system.
There is still this suspicious message in journalctl:

janv. 08 20:35:32 kos-moceratops gnome-software[34353]: plugin 'packagekit'
failed to list apps: Unsupported query

Could it be related?

Thanks for all!
Patrice


-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 
'oldstable-security'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (1, 
'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 6.6.9-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages gnome-software depends on:
ii  appstream1.0.1-3
ii  apt-config-icons 1.0.1-3
ii  dconf-gsettings-backend [gsettings-backend]  0.40.0-4+b1
ii  gnome-software-common45.3-2
ii  gsettings-desktop-schemas45.0-2
ii  libadwaita-1-0   1.4.2-1+b1
ii  libappstream51.0.1-3
ii  libc62.37-13
ii  libcairo21.18.0-1+b1
ii  libfwupd21.9.11-1
ii  libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0  2.42.10+dfsg-3
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.78.3-1
ii  libgtk-4-1   4.12.4+ds-3
ii  libgtk3-perl 0.038-3
ii  libgudev-1.0-0   238-3
ii  libjson-glib-1.0-0   1.8.0-2
ii  libmalcontent-0-00.11.1-1+b1
ii  libpackagekit-glib2-18   1.2.8-1+b1
ii  libpango-1.0-0   1.51.0+ds-3
ii  libpolkit-gobject-1-0123-3
ii  libsoup-3.0-03.4.4-2
ii  libxmlb2 0.3.14-2
ii  packagekit   1.2.8-1+b1
ii  software-properties-gtk  0.99.30-4

Versions of packages gnome-software recommends:
ii  fwupd  1.9.11-1

Versions of packages gnome-software suggests:
pn  apt-config-icons-hidpi 
pn  gnome-software-plugin-flatpak  
pn  gnome-software-plugin-snap 

-- no debconf information



Bug#1060251: valgrind: apt autopkgtests on armhf fail with: Access not within mapped region

2024-01-08 Thread Emanuele Rocca
I've added more context to https://bugs.debian.org/1059352#38, but just to have
some info here too this is the error:

722s ==221367== Copyright (C) 2002-2022, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
722s ==221367== Using Valgrind-3.20.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright 
info
722s ==221367== Command: /usr/bin/apt-get update -o Acquire::Queue-Mode=access
722s ==221367== 
722s ==221367== 
722s ==221367== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
722s ==221367==  Access not within mapped region at address 0xFE7F2A9C
722s ==221367==at 0x4938838: ReadMessages(int, 
std::vector, 
std::allocator >, std::allocator, std::allocator > > >&) (in 
/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libapt-pkg.so.6.0.0)
722s ==221367==  If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
722s ==221367==  overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
722s ==221367==  possible), you can try to increase the size of the
722s ==221367==  main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag.
722s ==221367==  The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608.
722s ==221367== 
722s ==221367== HEAP SUMMARY:
722s ==221367== in use at exit: 119,915 bytes in 1,882 blocks
722s ==221367==   total heap usage: 11,673 allocs, 9,791 frees, 868,849 bytes 
allocated
722s ==221367== 
722s ==221367== LEAK SUMMARY:
722s ==221367==definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
722s ==221367==indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
722s ==221367==  possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
722s ==221367==still reachable: 119,915 bytes in 1,882 blocks
722s ==221367== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
722s ==221367== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
722s ==221367== 
722s ==221367== For lists of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -s
722s ==221367== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 42821 from 
965)
722s Segmentation fault
722s FAIL: exitcode 139



Bug#1060208: ITP: dds-ktx -- header-only library for reading KTX format textures

2024-01-08 Thread David James
On further inspection, I have noticed that several commits have been made since 
1.1. To maintain compatibility with Citra I will therefore be bumping the 
version to 1.1~git20211021.c3ca8fe.

Bug#1012752: unattended-upgrades: regularly stuck in loop, eating CPU

2024-01-08 Thread Tomáš Szaniszlo
Package: unattended-upgrades
Version: 2.9.1+nmu3
Followup-For: Bug #1012752
X-Debbugs-Cc: tomaxu...@gmail.com

Hello, I have also stumbled upon this bug. The strace is quite the same
as the original reporter mentions. Although without debugging symbols,
I got a backtrace with GDB:

0x7feac853a096 in debVersioningSystem::CheckDep(char const*, int, char 
const*) () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libapt-pkg.so.6.0
b(gdb) bt
#0  0x7feac853a096 in debVersioningSystem::CheckDep(char const*, int, 
char const*) () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libapt-pkg.so.6.0
#1  0x7feac85510e8 in pkgDepCache::CheckDep(pkgCache::DepIterator 
const&, int, pkgCache::PkgIterator&) () from 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libapt-pkg.so.6.0
#2  0x7feac85517c0 in 
pkgDepCache::DependencyState(pkgCache::DepIterator const&) () from 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libapt-pkg.so.6.0
#3  0x7feac8551bf4 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libapt-pkg.so.6.0
#4  0x7feac8558a95 in pkgDepCache::Update(OpProgress*) () from 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libapt-pkg.so.6.0
#5  0x7feac855907a in pkgDepCache::Init(OpProgress*) () from 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libapt-pkg.so.6.0
#6  0x7feac87ace12 in ?? () from 
/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apt_pkg.cpython-311-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
#7  0x005206c8 in ?? ()
#8  0x00536950 in PyObject_Vectorcall ()
#9  0x00528559 in _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault ()
#10 0x0057d132 in ?? ()
#11 0x0057c9c4 in ?? ()
#12 0x00563868 in PyObject_Call ()
#13 0x0052c731 in _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault ()
#14 0x006046ff in PyEval_EvalCode ()
#15 0x0061e85b in ?? ()
#16 0x0061af33 in ?? ()
#17 0x0062d666 in ?? ()
#18 0x0062d3d1 in _PyRun_SimpleFileObject ()
#19 0x0062d1e8 in _PyRun_AnyFileObject ()
#20 0x0062b6bb in Py_RunMain ()
#21 0x005f7cab in Py_BytesMain ()
#22 0x7feaca6326ca in __libc_start_call_main (main=main@entry=0x5f7c10, 
argc=argc@entry=3, argv=argv@entry=0x7ffd8ec55da8) at 
../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
#23 0x7feaca632785 in __libc_start_main_impl (main=0x5f7c10, argc=3, 
argv=0x7ffd8ec55da8, init=, fini=, 
rtld_fini=, stack_end=0x7ffd8ec55d98)
at ../csu/libc-start.c:360
#24 0x005f7b41 in _start ()

So it seems that the problem is actually in the libapt-pkg6.0 package.
I have installed libapt-pkg6.0-dbgsym if this repeats again. The
untattended-upgrades.log contains this:

2024-01-08 09:07:18,617 INFO Starting unattended upgrades script
2024-01-08 09:07:18,624 INFO Allowed origins are: 
origin=Debian,codename=trixie,label=Debian, 
origin=Debian,codename=trixie,label=Debian-Security, 
origin=Debian,codename=trixie-security,label=Debian-Security
2024-01-08 09:07:18,624 INFO Initial blacklist:
2024-01-08 09:07:18,624 INFO Initial whitelist (not strict):
2024-01-08 19:59:49,586 WARNING SIGTERM received, will stop

My /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades contains this:

Unattended-Upgrade::Origins-Pattern {
"origin=Debian,codename=${distro_codename},label=Debian";
"origin=Debian,codename=${distro_codename},label=Debian-Security";

"origin=Debian,codename=${distro_codename}-security,label=Debian-Security";
};
Unattended-Upgrade::Package-Blacklist {
};
Unattended-Upgrade::Mail "root";
Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies "true";

I think this is all I can provide now.

Best wishes,
TomaS

-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers testing-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.5.0-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, 
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages unattended-upgrades depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.83
ii  lsb-base   11.6
ii  lsb-release12.0-2
ii  python33.11.4-5+b1
ii  python3-apt2.7.0+b1
ii  python3-dbus   1.3.2-5+b1
ii  python3-distro-info1.7
ii  sysvinit-utils [lsb-base]  3.08-5
ii  ucf3.0043+nmu1
ii  xz-utils   5.4.5-0.3

Versions of packages unattended-upgrades recommends:
ii  anacron 2.3-39
ii  cron [cron-daemon]  3.0pl1-181
ii  systemd-sysv255.2-2

Versions of packages unattended-upgrades suggests:
pn  bsd-mailx  
ii  exim4-daemon-light [mail-transport-agent]  4.97-3
ii  needrestart3.6-7
ii  powermgmt-base 1.37
ii  python3-gi 3.46.0-1+b1

-- 

Bug#1060202: glibc - autopkgtest flacky on arm64

2024-01-08 Thread Paul Gevers

Hi all,

On 08-01-2024 19:50, Paul Gevers wrote:
Can you tell me how you saw that? I neither spotted that, nor is not 
having swap a conscious act, so rather a mistake.


I just checked and it seems that on ci-worker-arm64-08 was not having 
swap. We did have /swap created as our other workers, but apparently 
that was never made a swap file and mounted.


After fixing, now $(cat /proc/meminfo | grep SwapTotal) says:
  ci-worker-arm64-02: SwapTotal:   4084220 kB
  ci-worker-arm64-03: SwapTotal:   4084220 kB
  ci-worker-arm64-04: SwapTotal:   4084220 kB
  ci-worker-arm64-06: SwapTotal:   4084220 kB
  ci-worker-arm64-05: SwapTotal:   4084220 kB
  ci-worker-arm64-07: SwapTotal:   4084220 kB
  ci-worker-arm64-11: SwapTotal:   4084220 kB
  ci-worker-arm64-10: SwapTotal:   4084220 kB
  ci-worker-arm64-08: SwapTotal:   4084220 kB
  ci-worker-arm64-09: SwapTotal:   4084220 kB

Paul


OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1060275: asterisk: Codec translation notice

2024-01-08 Thread TOOTAi
FYI we are running other servers with thé samedi setup but codec configuration 
is !all, alaw and alaw on provider side -eg no g722 involved- and they don' t 
show those notices

Le 8 janv. 2024 à 19:30, à 19:30, Jonas Smedegaard  a écrit:
>Hi Daniel,
>
>Quoting Daniel via Pkg-voip-maintainers (2024-01-08 16:22:19)
>> after upgrading from Debian11/asterisk 18.20.2 compiled from source
>to Debian12/Asterisk 20.5.2 from unstable, we receive lots of NOTICE
>logs like
>>
>> [2024-01-08 11:35:31] NOTICE[58221][C-028a]: translate.c:603
>ast_translate: 18182 lost frame(s) 48240/30057 (alaw@8000)->(ulaw@8000)
>> [2024-01-08 11:35:31] NOTICE[58710][C-0298]: translate.c:603
>ast_translate: 1253 lost frame(s) 1254/0
>(slin@16000)->(slin@8000)->(alaw@8000)
>>
>> doesn't matter IAX2 or PJSIP endpoints. We are surprised to see such
>notice between alaw & ulaw. Codecs used for PJSIP and IAX customers EP
>are
>> !all,g722,ulaw,alaw and for providers !all,ulaw,alaw
>>
>> We checked translation and tried by adding slin,slin16 on both sides,
>no changes. On 18.20.2 we didn't have this behaviour.
>>
>> Answer we get from asterisk community list "If you’re using the
>Debian package, then that includes patches which are not present in
>Asterisk mainline.
>> Those log messages, and some codec translation behavior, is from one
>of those patches."
>
>Thanks for your bugreport.
>
>It is true that Debian-distributed Asterisk includes patches which may
>indeed affect the above.  But only possibly, not certainly.
>
>If it is possible for you to try test your setup with
>upstream-distributed Asterisk, then it would help ensure that truly
>what
>you experience is a bug introduced by a Debian patch.
>
>
> - Jonas
>
>--
> * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
> * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
> * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones
>
> [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


Bug#1060282: rtpengine: install files into /usr (DEP17 M2)

2024-01-08 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
Source: rtpengine
Version: 11.5.1.14-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: dep17m2

Your package currently hard-codes the install path for two systemd
unit symlinks. Attached is a patch to have this based on systemd.pc.
The motivation for this is the currently ongoing UsrMerge effort
[1], and I figured you likely want the same source package to work
on earlier releases.

The patch has been build-tested and checked by dumat, piuparts and
autopkgtest.

If you don't need to support earlier releases, you can just
hard-code the path in /usr/lib.

Please consider uploading this sooner than later, but in any case it
should go in for trixie.

Chris

[1] https://wiki.debian.org/UsrMerge
diff -Nru rtpengine-11.5.1.14/debian/changelog rtpengine-11.5.1.14/debian/changelog
--- rtpengine-11.5.1.14/debian/changelog	2023-11-17 13:29:29.0 +0100
+++ rtpengine-11.5.1.14/debian/changelog	2024-01-08 14:11:28.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+rtpengine (11.5.1.14-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Honor systemdsystemunitdir from systemd.pc (DEP17 M2) (Closes: #-1)
+
+ -- Chris Hofstaedtler   Mon, 08 Jan 2024 14:11:28 +0100
+
 rtpengine (11.5.1.14-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * New upstream version 11.5.1.14
diff -Nru rtpengine-11.5.1.14/debian/control rtpengine-11.5.1.14/debian/control
--- rtpengine-11.5.1.14/debian/control	2023-11-17 13:29:29.0 +0100
+++ rtpengine-11.5.1.14/debian/control	2024-01-08 14:09:18.0 +0100
@@ -52,8 +52,10 @@
  libxtables-dev (>= 1.4) | iptables-dev (>= 1.4),
  markdown,
  pandoc,
+ pkgconf,
  python3,
  python3-websockets,
+ systemd-dev | systemd,
  zlib1g-dev,
 Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-dkms
 
diff -Nru rtpengine-11.5.1.14/debian/rtpengine-daemon.links rtpengine-11.5.1.14/debian/rtpengine-daemon.links
--- rtpengine-11.5.1.14/debian/rtpengine-daemon.links	2023-11-17 13:29:29.0 +0100
+++ rtpengine-11.5.1.14/debian/rtpengine-daemon.links	2024-01-08 14:10:41.0 +0100
@@ -1 +1 @@
-/lib/systemd/system/rtpengine-daemon.service	/lib/systemd/system/rtpengine.service
+${env:deb_systemdsystemunitdir}/rtpengine-daemon.service	${env:deb_systemdsystemunitdir}/rtpengine.service
diff -Nru rtpengine-11.5.1.14/debian/rtpengine-recording-daemon.links rtpengine-11.5.1.14/debian/rtpengine-recording-daemon.links
--- rtpengine-11.5.1.14/debian/rtpengine-recording-daemon.links	2023-11-17 13:29:29.0 +0100
+++ rtpengine-11.5.1.14/debian/rtpengine-recording-daemon.links	2024-01-08 14:11:07.0 +0100
@@ -1 +1 @@
-/lib/systemd/system/rtpengine-recording-daemon.service	/lib/systemd/system/rtpengine-recording.service
+${env:deb_systemdsystemunitdir}/rtpengine-recording-daemon.service	${env:deb_systemdsystemunitdir}/rtpengine-recording.service
diff -Nru rtpengine-11.5.1.14/debian/rules rtpengine-11.5.1.14/debian/rules
--- rtpengine-11.5.1.14/debian/rules	2023-11-17 13:29:29.0 +0100
+++ rtpengine-11.5.1.14/debian/rules	2024-01-08 14:10:17.0 +0100
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@
 export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_SET =
 endif
 
+export deb_systemdsystemunitdir = $(shell pkg-config --variable=systemdsystemunitdir systemd)
+
 %:
 	dh $@
 


Bug#1060202: glibc - autopkgtest flacky on arm64

2024-01-08 Thread Paul Gevers

Hi,

On 08-01-2024 01:45, Aurelien Jarno wrote:

I am still not sure why it got killed on arm64 and not on other debci
workers, there as still swap available. Actually looking at the munin
plot, it seems that the arm64 debci workers stopped using swap around
September 2023 contrary to the other architectures.


Can you tell me how you saw that? I neither spotted that, nor is not 
having swap a conscious act, so rather a mistake.


Paul


OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1056380: AW: Bug#1056380: Same issue under Ubuntu 22.04, reprepro hangs on Ubuntu package, unzstd process waiting

2024-01-08 Thread Bastian Germann

Hi Christoph,

Would you please post your change proposals as patches or Merge Requests?
That makes it much more easy to review.

Thanks,
Bastian



Bug#1060255: Instead of certain text, squares are displayed in the interface

2024-01-08 Thread Rene Engelhard

tag 1060255 + unreproducible

tag 1060255 + moreinfo

thanks


Hi,

Am 08.01.24 um 11:32 schrieb Артём:

Package: libreoffice-l10n-ru
Version: 4:7.4.7-1+deb12u1
Severity: |important|
|Tags: ||l10n|
|
|
For example, in LibreOffice Start Center, some text in the options

Which "text in the options"? You mean the buttons?

does not display correctly.


Works fine here, (assuming LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8. You omitted all of the 
helpful information reportbug would give.)



FWIW, I just looked, for cyrillic languages I don't see "default fonts" 
defined.  Neither in the configs inside libreoffice-l10n-ru:


$ grep -i font /etc/libreoffice/registry/Langpack-ru.xcd 
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/fcfg_langpack_ru.xcd 
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name="private:resource/toolbar/fontworkobjectbar">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name="private:resource/toolbar/fontworkshapetype">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name="private:resource/toolbar/fontworkobjectbar">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name="private:resource/toolbar/fontworkshapetype">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name="ooo-emphasis-font">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name="ooo-emphasis-font-color">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name="ooo-emphasis-font-size">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name="ooo-emphasis-font-style">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkGalleryFloater">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkSameLetterHeights">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkAlignmentFloater">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkCharacterSpacingFloater">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType.fontwork-plain-text">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType.fontwork-wave">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType.fontwork-inflate">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType.fontwork-stop">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType.fontwork-curve-up">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType.fontwork-curve-down">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType.fontwork-triangle-up">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType.fontwork-triangle-down">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType.fontwork-fade-right">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType.fontwork-fade-left">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType.fontwork-fade-up">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType.fontwork-fade-down">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType.fontwork-slant-up">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType.fontwork-slant-down">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType.fontwork-fade-up-and-right">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType.fontwork-fade-up-and-left">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType.fontwork-chevron-up">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType.fontwork-chevron-down">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType.fontwork-arch-up-curve">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType.fontwork-arch-down-curve">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType.fontwork-arch-left-curve">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType.fontwork-arch-right-curve">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType.fontwork-circle-curve">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType.fontwork-open-circle-curve">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType.fontwork-arch-up-pour">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    oor:name=".uno:FontworkShapeType.fontwork-arch-down-pour">
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/registry_ru.xcd:    

Bug#1060275: asterisk: Codec translation notice

2024-01-08 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Daniel,

Quoting Daniel via Pkg-voip-maintainers (2024-01-08 16:22:19)
> after upgrading from Debian11/asterisk 18.20.2 compiled from source to 
> Debian12/Asterisk 20.5.2 from unstable, we receive lots of NOTICE logs like
> 
> [2024-01-08 11:35:31] NOTICE[58221][C-028a]: translate.c:603 
> ast_translate: 18182 lost frame(s) 48240/30057 (alaw@8000)->(ulaw@8000)
> [2024-01-08 11:35:31] NOTICE[58710][C-0298]: translate.c:603 
> ast_translate: 1253 lost frame(s) 1254/0 
> (slin@16000)->(slin@8000)->(alaw@8000)
> 
> doesn't matter IAX2 or PJSIP endpoints. We are surprised to see such notice 
> between alaw & ulaw. Codecs used for PJSIP and IAX customers EP are
> !all,g722,ulaw,alaw and for providers !all,ulaw,alaw
> 
> We checked translation and tried by adding slin,slin16 on both sides, no 
> changes. On 18.20.2 we didn't have this behaviour.
> 
> Answer we get from asterisk community list "If you’re using the Debian 
> package, then that includes patches which are not present in Asterisk 
> mainline.
> Those log messages, and some codec translation behavior, is from one of those 
> patches."

Thanks for your bugreport.

It is true that Debian-distributed Asterisk includes patches which may
indeed affect the above.  But only possibly, not certainly.

If it is possible for you to try test your setup with
upstream-distributed Asterisk, then it would help ensure that truly what
you experience is a bug introduced by a Debian patch.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
 * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

signature.asc
Description: signature


Bug#1060280: linux-image-4.19.0-25-cloud-amd64: PCI ATS quirk patch needed for IDPF

2024-01-08 Thread Bastian Blank
Control: tags -1 moreinfo

On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 05:48:46PM +, Andrew Jorgensen wrote:
> The patch was released in Linux 6.7:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?h=v6.7=a18615b1cfc04f00548c60eb9a77e0ce56e848fd
> It's been backported to 5.15 in the LTS kernels, but customers may need
> it in older kernels for Debian.

It has been backported to 6.1, so Debian Bookworm will get it.  Debian
Bullseye will get a backport of the whole kernel.

Further backports need at least
f18b1137d38c091cc8c16365219f0a1d4a30b3d1.  Please also do them via
stable@

Bastian

-- 
Each kiss is as the first.
-- Miramanee, Kirk's wife, "The Paradise Syndrome",
   stardate 4842.6



Bug#1034891: closed by Timo Aaltonen (Re: [Pkg-freeipa-devel] Bug#1034891: 389-ds-base: CVE-2023-1055)

2024-01-08 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi,

On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 06:56:40PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Source: 389-ds-base
> > Version: 2.3.4+dfsg1-1
> > 
> > Moritz Mühlenhoff kirjoitti 26.4.2023 klo 20.43:
> > > Source: 389-ds-base
> > > X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org
> > > Severity: important
> > > Tags: security
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > The following vulnerability was published for 389-ds-base.
> > > 
> > > CVE-2023-1055[0]:
> > > | A flaw was found in RHDS 11 and RHDS 12. While browsing entries LDAP
> > > | tries to decode the userPassword attribute instead of the
> > > | userCertificate attribute which could lead into sensitive information
> > > | leaked. An attacker with a local account where the cockpit-389-ds is
> > > | running can list the processes and display the hashed passwords. The
> > > | highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality.
> > > 
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173517
> > > 
> > > If you fix the vulnerability please also make sure to include the
> > > CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id in your changelog entry.
> > > 
> > > For further information see:
> > > 
> > > [0] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2023-1055
> > >  https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1055
> > > 
> > > Please adjust the affected versions in the BTS as needed.
> > 
> > this was fixed upstream in 2.3.2
> 
> Do you have a reference to an upstream issue and/or upstream changes
> in 2.3.2 which fixes the issue?

Or is it actually more related to
https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/5687 which then would be
in 2.3.5 instead? (and inline with fedora importing 2.3.5 and
addressing the CVE?)

Regards,
Salvatore



Bug#1034891: closed by Timo Aaltonen (Re: [Pkg-freeipa-devel] Bug#1034891: 389-ds-base: CVE-2023-1055)

2024-01-08 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
> Source: 389-ds-base
> Version: 2.3.4+dfsg1-1
> 
> Moritz Mühlenhoff kirjoitti 26.4.2023 klo 20.43:
> > Source: 389-ds-base
> > X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: security
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > The following vulnerability was published for 389-ds-base.
> > 
> > CVE-2023-1055[0]:
> > | A flaw was found in RHDS 11 and RHDS 12. While browsing entries LDAP
> > | tries to decode the userPassword attribute instead of the
> > | userCertificate attribute which could lead into sensitive information
> > | leaked. An attacker with a local account where the cockpit-389-ds is
> > | running can list the processes and display the hashed passwords. The
> > | highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality.
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173517
> > 
> > If you fix the vulnerability please also make sure to include the
> > CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id in your changelog entry.
> > 
> > For further information see:
> > 
> > [0] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2023-1055
> >  https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1055
> > 
> > Please adjust the affected versions in the BTS as needed.
> 
> this was fixed upstream in 2.3.2

Do you have a reference to an upstream issue and/or upstream changes
in 2.3.2 which fixes the issue?

Regards,
Salvatore



Bug#1053449: visidata package still has missing dependence on python3-pkg-resources

2024-01-08 Thread Anja
Yayyy! I'll be reaching out this weekend most likely. =))

On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 08:24, Martin  wrote:

> Quoting Anja :
> > I am planning to package version 3 in the next week. When is the deadline
> > for Debian12?
>
> Debian 12.4 has been released on 2023-12-10 and I'm not aware of fixed date
> for 12.5. Anyway, version 3 cannot go into Debian 12 ("bookworm"), it can
> only target Debian 13 ("trixie").
>
> For Debian 12, we can do two things:
>
> 1. Fix the missing dependency in a package 2.11-1+deb12u1 for Debian 12.5
> (or, if things go wrong badly, for 12.6)
>
> 2. Prepare a backport of version 3, as soon as the package is in Debian
> testing (typically five days after upload to unstable)
>
> I can guide you through this jungle and later sponsor the uploads, np.
> It's easier than it might sound!
>
> Cheers, Martin
>


Bug#1060281: ITP: r-cran-marginaleffects -- GNU R predictions, comparisons, slopes, marginal means, and hypothesis

2024-01-08 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

Subject: ITP: r-cran-marginaleffects -- GNU R predictions, comparisons, slopes, 
marginal means, and hypothesis
Package: wnpp
Owner: Andreas Tille 
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: r-cran-marginaleffects
  Version : 0.17.0
  Upstream Author : Vincent Arel-Bundock, Marcio Augusto Diniz,
* URL : https://cran.r-project.org/package=marginaleffects
* License : GPL-3+
  Programming Lang: GNU R
  Description : GNU R predictions, comparisons, slopes, marginal means, and 
hypothesis
 Tests Compute and plot predictions, slopes, marginal means, and
 comparisons (contrasts, risk ratios, odds, etc.) for over 100 classes of
 statistical and machine learning models in R. Conduct linear and non-
 linear hypothesis tests, or equivalence tests. Calculate uncertainty
 estimates using the delta method, bootstrapping, or simulation-based
 inference.

Remark: This package is maintained by Debian R Packages Maintainers at
   https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-cran-marginaleffects



Bug#1060280: linux-image-4.19.0-25-cloud-amd64: PCI ATS quirk patch needed for IDPF

2024-01-08 Thread Andrew Jorgensen
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.19.289-2
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

Intel has introduced a new network card. They have submitted the driver
to the upstream kernel. We don't know if it's reasonable to ask that
this driver be backported to Debian, or to older versions of Debian, but
in order to use an out-of-tree driver on older versions, a PCI ATS
quirks patch is needed for some early versions of the hardware. Thus
we're asking if it's possible to backport that quirks patch to older
versions of Debian, so that users can use the out-of-tree driver.

The patch was released in Linux 6.7:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?h=v6.7=a18615b1cfc04f00548c60eb9a77e0ce56e848fd

It's been backported to 5.15 in the LTS kernels, but customers may need
it in older kernels for Debian.

-- Package-specific info:
** Kernel log: boot messages should be attached


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.13
  APT prefers oldoldstable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'oldoldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldoldstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-24-cloud-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=C.UTF-8 
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages linux-image-4.19.0-25-cloud-amd64 depends on:
ii  initramfs-tools [linux-initramfs-tool]  0.133+deb10u1
ii  kmod26-1
ii  linux-base  4.6

Versions of packages linux-image-4.19.0-25-cloud-amd64 recommends:
ii  apparmor 2.13.2-10
ii  firmware-linux-free  3.4

Versions of packages linux-image-4.19.0-25-cloud-amd64 suggests:
pn  debian-kernel-handbook  
ii  grub-pc 2.06-3~deb10u4
pn  linux-doc-4.19  

Versions of packages linux-image-4.19.0-25-cloud-amd64 is related to:
pn  firmware-amd-graphics 
pn  firmware-atheros  
pn  firmware-bnx2 
pn  firmware-bnx2x
pn  firmware-brcm80211
pn  firmware-cavium   
pn  firmware-intel-sound  
pn  firmware-intelwimax   
pn  firmware-ipw2x00  
pn  firmware-ivtv 
pn  firmware-iwlwifi  
pn  firmware-libertas 
pn  firmware-linux-nonfree
pn  firmware-misc-nonfree 
pn  firmware-myricom  
pn  firmware-netxen   
pn  firmware-qlogic   
pn  firmware-realtek  
pn  firmware-samsung  
pn  firmware-siano
pn  firmware-ti-connectivity  
pn  xen-hypervisor

-- no debconf information



Bug#1060279: ITP: r-cran-nanoarrow -- GNU R interface to the 'nanoarrow' 'C' Library

2024-01-08 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

Subject: ITP: r-cran-nanoarrow -- GNU R interface to the 'nanoarrow' 'C' Library
Package: wnpp
Owner: Andreas Tille 
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: r-cran-nanoarrow
  Version : 0.3.0.1
  Upstream Author : Dewey Dunnington,
* URL : https://cran.r-project.org/package=nanoarrow
* License : Apache-2.0
  Programming Lang: GNU R
  Description : GNU R interface to the 'nanoarrow' 'C' Library
 Provides an 'R' interface to the 'nanoarrow' 'C' library and the
 'Apache Arrow' application binary interface. Functions to import and
 export 'ArrowArray', 'ArrowSchema', and 'ArrowArrayStream' 'C' structures
 to and from 'R' objects are provided alongside helpers to facilitate zero-copy
 data transfer among 'R' bindings to libraries implementing the 'Arrow' 'C'
 data interface.

Remark: This package is maintained by Debian R Packages Maintainers at
   https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-cran-nanoarrow



Bug#1060278: gnome-backgrounds: Update to 46

2024-01-08 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: gnome-backgrounds
Version: 45.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Control: block -1 by 1001786
Control: affects -1 src:gsettings-desktop-schemas

gnome-backgrounds 46 is switching several of its provided wallpaper
images to the JPEG XL format. These wallpapers will not be displayed
in the GNOME 46 desktop unless the jpeg-xl gdk-pixbuf support is
installed.

Therefore, we need to have something depend on the jpeg-xl gdk-pixbuf
package once it's available in Debian Unstable (it is not available
yet).

Meanwhile, we need to revert the gsettings-desktop-schemas default
wallpaper filename to continue using the GNOME 45 version until
gnome-backgrounds 46 is in Debian Unstable.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1059352: src:apt: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression on armhf

2024-01-08 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Control: retitle -1 valgrind: Access not within mapped region on armhf

Hello Paul and Julian,

On 2023-12-24 07:31, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 23-12-2023 20:40, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > the logs for well known bugs so that you don't end up filing bugs
> > against every package broken by valgrind's missing support for the new
> > NOP sequences in binutils.
> 
> I do *some* minor triaging, but I didn't know this to be a common problem.

Note that there are three distinct valgrind problems mentioned here:

- on armhf, flagging accesses below the stack pointer as illegal. This
  came up after enabling stack-clash-protection on armhf. I added a
  suppression for this problem in valgrind 1:3.20.0-2, so we shouldn't
  be seeing those anymore. For reference:
  https://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2023/12/msg7.html

- on i386, valgrind was failing due to new nop patterns that it didn't
  know about. This is https://bugs.debian.org/1057693 and was fixed by
  Aurelien in 1:3.20.0-2.1

- on armhf, a segfault when testing apt. I don't think this issue is
  widespread at all: in fact I'm not aware of any other instances except
  for apt. After going through all armhf CI failures caused by segfaults, apt
  seems to be the only one with valgrind in the picture. Just to be
  clear: I'm not saying that the problem is trivial, just that AFAIK it's
  not widespread. I'm including the relevant CI logs below for
  reference. Also I'm attaching the horrible script I've written to fetch
  all armhf CI failures in case anyone wants to poke around.

722s ==221367== Copyright (C) 2002-2022, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
722s ==221367== Using Valgrind-3.20.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright 
info
722s ==221367== Command: /usr/bin/apt-get update -o Acquire::Queue-Mode=access
722s ==221367== 
722s ==221367== 
722s ==221367== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
722s ==221367==  Access not within mapped region at address 0xFE7F2A9C
722s ==221367==at 0x4938838: ReadMessages(int, 
std::vector, 
std::allocator >, std::allocator, std::allocator > > >&) (in 
/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libapt-pkg.so.6.0.0)
722s ==221367==  If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
722s ==221367==  overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
722s ==221367==  possible), you can try to increase the size of the
722s ==221367==  main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag.
722s ==221367==  The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608.
722s ==221367== 
722s ==221367== HEAP SUMMARY:
722s ==221367== in use at exit: 119,915 bytes in 1,882 blocks
722s ==221367==   total heap usage: 11,673 allocs, 9,791 frees, 868,849 bytes 
allocated
722s ==221367== 
722s ==221367== LEAK SUMMARY:
722s ==221367==definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
722s ==221367==indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
722s ==221367==  possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
722s ==221367==still reachable: 119,915 bytes in 1,882 blocks
722s ==221367== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
722s ==221367== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
722s ==221367== 
722s ==221367== For lists of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -s
722s ==221367== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 42821 from 
965)
722s Segmentation fault
722s FAIL: exitcode 139


armhf-ci-segfaults.sh
Description: Bourne shell script


Bug#1060269: /lib/cryptsetup/askpass: coordinated move to /usr for DEP17

2024-01-08 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 02:56:16PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> I've done a similar conversion for molly-guard/systemd and have prepared
> patches for cryptsetup-nuke-password and cryptsetup. Notably:

I actually forgot to attach the patches (thanks Raphael), so here go the
patches.

What I also forgot to mention is that I applied quite some testing. You
cannot test these patches with piuparts, because they need to be
upgraded in lockstep, so I wrote a kind of mini-piuparts based on
debhelper that specifically validates all kinds of upgrades and checks
for correct diversions. Also attaching the tests.

Hope this is good to upload now.

Helmut
diff --minimal -Nru cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/changelog 
cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/changelog
--- cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/changelog   2023-12-05 17:48:58.0 +0100
+++ cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/changelog   2024-01-05 18:56:40.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+cryptsetup (2:2.6.1-6.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * DEP17: Move fles to /usr. (Closes: #-1)
+
+ -- Helmut Grohne   Fri, 05 Jan 2024 18:56:40 +0100
+
 cryptsetup (2:2.6.1-6) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   [ Kevin Locke ]
diff --minimal -Nru cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/control 
cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/control
--- cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/control 2023-12-05 17:48:58.0 +0100
+++ cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/control 2024-01-05 18:56:40.0 +0100
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@
 Architecture: linux-any
 Multi-Arch: foreign
 Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}
+Conflicts: cryptsetup-nuke-password (<< 4+nmu2~)
 Description: disk encryption support - command line tools
  Cryptsetup provides an interface for configuring encryption on block
  devices (such as /home or swap partitions), using the Linux kernel
diff --minimal -Nru cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/cryptsetup-bin.install 
cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/cryptsetup-bin.install
--- cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/cryptsetup-bin.install  2023-12-05 
17:48:58.0 +0100
+++ cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/cryptsetup-bin.install  2024-01-05 
18:56:40.0 +0100
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-sbin/cryptsetup
-sbin/integritysetup
-sbin/veritysetup
+usr/sbin/cryptsetup
+usr/sbin/integritysetup
+usr/sbin/veritysetup
 usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/cryptsetup.conf
 usr/share/locale/*/*/*
diff --minimal -Nru cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/cryptsetup-ssh.install 
cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/cryptsetup-ssh.install
--- cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/cryptsetup-ssh.install  2023-12-05 
17:48:58.0 +0100
+++ cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/cryptsetup-ssh.install  2024-01-05 
18:56:40.0 +0100
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-lib/${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}/cryptsetup/libcryptsetup-token-ssh.so
-sbin/cryptsetup-ssh
+usr/lib/${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}/cryptsetup/libcryptsetup-token-ssh.so
+usr/sbin/cryptsetup-ssh
diff --minimal -Nru cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/cryptsetup-suspend.install 
cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/cryptsetup-suspend.install
--- cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/cryptsetup-suspend.install  2023-12-05 
17:48:58.0 +0100
+++ cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/cryptsetup-suspend.install  2024-01-05 
18:56:40.0 +0100
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-debian/scripts/suspend/cryptsetup-suspend /lib/cryptsetup/scripts/suspend/
-debian/scripts/suspend/cryptsetup-suspend-wrapper 
/lib/cryptsetup/scripts/suspend/
-debian/scripts/suspend/cryptsetup-suspend.shutdown 
/lib/systemd/system-shutdown/
+debian/scripts/suspend/cryptsetup-suspend /usr/lib/cryptsetup/scripts/suspend/
+debian/scripts/suspend/cryptsetup-suspend-wrapper 
/usr/lib/cryptsetup/scripts/suspend/
+debian/scripts/suspend/cryptsetup-suspend.shutdown 
/usr/lib/systemd/system-shutdown/
 debian/scripts/suspend/suspend.conf /etc/cryptsetup/
-debian/scripts/suspend/systemd/cryptsetup-suspend.conf 
/lib/systemd/system/systemd-suspend.service.d/
+debian/scripts/suspend/systemd/cryptsetup-suspend.conf 
/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-suspend.service.d/
diff --minimal -Nru cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/cryptsetup-udeb.install 
cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/cryptsetup-udeb.install
--- cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/cryptsetup-udeb.install 2023-12-05 
17:48:58.0 +0100
+++ cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/cryptsetup-udeb.install 2024-01-05 
18:56:40.0 +0100
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-debian/askpass  /lib/cryptsetup/
-debian/checks/* /lib/cryptsetup/checks/
-debian/cryptdisks-functions /lib/cryptsetup/
-debian/functions/lib/cryptsetup/
-debian/scripts/decrypt_*/lib/cryptsetup/scripts/
-debian/scripts/passdev  /lib/cryptsetup/scripts/
-sbin/cryptsetup
+debian/askpass  /usr/lib/cryptsetup/
+debian/checks/* /usr/lib/cryptsetup/checks/
+debian/cryptdisks-functions /usr/lib/cryptsetup/
+debian/functions/usr/lib/cryptsetup/
+debian/scripts/decrypt_*/usr/lib/cryptsetup/scripts/
+debian/scripts/passdev  /usr/lib/cryptsetup/scripts/
+usr/sbin/cryptsetup
diff --minimal -Nru cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/cryptsetup.install 
cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/cryptsetup.install
--- cryptsetup-2.6.1/debian/cryptsetup.install  2023-12-05 

Bug#1060100: r-cran-rstanarm: FTBFS: Error: segfault from C stack overflow

2024-01-08 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: tags -1 unreproducible

Hi Sebastian,

I tried to reproduce the problem in a (pbuilder) chroot locally but here
all went fine.  Please note that r-cran-rstanarm is a quite
resource-hungry build.  Could you please make sure there are sufficient
resources available for the build?

Kind regards
Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Bug#1060277: pdfproctools: typo in setpdfmetadata man page

2024-01-08 Thread Sam Lee
Package: pdfproctools
Version: 1.9.4-1
Severity: minor

Dear Maintainer,

There is a typo in man page of setpdfmetadata:

 title Subject
    Sets the document subject to the given value.

It should probably be "subject Subject" instead of "title Subject".


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.4
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-17-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages pdfproctools depends on:
ii  ghostscript   10.0.0~dfsg-11+deb12u3
ii  libpdf-api2-perl  2.044-1
ii  perl  5.36.0-7+deb12u1
ii  qpdf  11.3.0-1+deb12u1

pdfproctools recommends no packages.

pdfproctools suggests no packages.



Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 04:12:42PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > - once these packages have all cleared binary NEW, the new dpkg defaults
> >   will be uploaded to unstable

> What happened to the plan to workaround this by doing dak database
> shenanigans prior to uploading to avoid binary-NEW altogether, that
> I chatted about with mhy/#debian-ftp and you? Did that not work out?

That wasn't called out here but is part of the implementation details of the
plan.  The intention is still to go through binary NEW in experimental
before copying to unstable, because it will take time to get all the binary
uploads done (longer than it will take to get the sourceful uploads to
unstable done), so it's better to stage in experimental to minimize the
window in unstable when uploads can be broken.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer   https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1053449: visidata package still has missing dependence on python3-pkg-resources

2024-01-08 Thread Martin

Quoting Anja :

I am planning to package version 3 in the next week. When is the deadline
for Debian12?


Debian 12.4 has been released on 2023-12-10 and I'm not aware of fixed date
for 12.5. Anyway, version 3 cannot go into Debian 12 ("bookworm"), it can
only target Debian 13 ("trixie").

For Debian 12, we can do two things:

1. Fix the missing dependency in a package 2.11-1+deb12u1 for Debian 12.5
   (or, if things go wrong badly, for 12.6)

2. Prepare a backport of version 3, as soon as the package is in Debian
   testing (typically five days after upload to unstable)

I can guide you through this jungle and later sponsor the uploads, np.
It's easier than it might sound!

Cheers, Martin



Bug#1056471: python-fabio: debdiff with patch from upstream recommendation

2024-01-08 Thread Jerome Kieffer
This looks good to be. Thanks for your contribution.
Cheers,
-- 
Jérôme Kieffer



Bug#1053449: visidata package still has missing dependence on python3-pkg-resources

2024-01-08 Thread Anja
I am planning to package version 3 in the next week. When is the deadline
for Debian12?

On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 06:21, John  wrote:

> Package: visidata
> Version: 2.11-1
> Followup-For: Bug #1053449
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 12  up to date at 13:00 1Jan2024
>
> After installing the visidata package, the command vd gave output
> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pkg_resources'
>
> The visidata pkg should have a dependence on python3-pkg-resources
> With that package installed, it works.
>
> This was reported 4 Oct 2023 Debian Bug report #1053449
>
> Anja  wrote on 15 Dec 2023
> We actually are going to address this in the next release:
> v3.0 is slated for in the next 2-4 weeks.
>
> Will Debian12 get version 3?  If not, the bug will persist in Debian12.
>
> John
>


Bug#1060276: pygalmesh: autopkgtest regression in testing

2024-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: pygalmesh
Version: 0.10.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression

Hi Maintainer

Sometime between 2023-11-08 and 2023-12-06, pygalmesh's autopkgtests
started to fail in testing [1][2].  I've copied what I hope is the
relevant part of the log below.

Regards
Graham


[1] https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/pygalmesh/testing/amd64/
[2] https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/pygalmesh/testing/armhf/


98s === FAILURES
===
98s ___ test_inr
___
98s
98s def test_inr():
98s this_dir = pathlib.Path(__file__).resolve().parent
98s # mesh = pygalmesh.generate_from_inr(
98s # this_dir / "meshes" / "skull_2.9.inr",
max_cell_circumradius=5.0, verbose=False
98s # )
98s with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
98s out_filename = str(pathlib.Path(tmp) / "out.vtk")
98s pygalmesh._cli.cli(
98s [
98s "from-inr",
98s str(this_dir / "meshes" / "sphere.inr"),
98s out_filename,
98s "--max-cell-circumradius",
98s "1.0",
98s "--quiet",
98s ]
98s )
98s mesh = meshio.read(out_filename)
98s
98s vals_refs = [
98s (max(mesh.points[:, 0]), 9.00478554e00),
98s (min(mesh.points[:, 0]), -4.25843196e-03),
98s (max(mesh.points[:, 1]), 9.00332642e00),
98s (min(mesh.points[:, 1]), -4.41271299e-03),
98s (max(mesh.points[:, 2]), 9.00407982e00),
98s (min(mesh.points[:, 2]), -3.98639357e-03),
98s ]
98s for val, ref in vals_refs:
98s > assert abs(val - ref) < 1.0e-3 * (1.0 + abs(ref)), f"{val:.8e}
!= {ref:.8e}"
98s E AssertionError: -4.99461079e-03 != -3.98639357e-03
98s E assert 0.0010082172201632787 < (0.001 * (1.0 + 0.00398639357))
98s E + where 0.0010082172201632787 = abs((-0.004994611 - -0.00398639357))
98s E + and 0.00398639357 = abs(-0.00398639357)
98s
98s tests/test_inr.py:38: AssertionError



Bug#1060275: asterisk: Codec translation notice

2024-01-08 Thread Daniel
Package: asterisk
Version: 1:20.5.2~dfsg+~cs6.13.40431414-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream

Dear Maintainer,

after upgrading from Debian11/asterisk 18.20.2 compiled from source to 
Debian12/Asterisk 20.5.2 from unstable, we receive lots of NOTICE logs like

[2024-01-08 11:35:31] NOTICE[58221][C-028a]: translate.c:603 ast_translate: 
18182 lost frame(s) 48240/30057 (alaw@8000)->(ulaw@8000)
[2024-01-08 11:35:31] NOTICE[58710][C-0298]: translate.c:603 ast_translate: 
1253 lost frame(s) 1254/0 (slin@16000)->(slin@8000)->(alaw@8000)

doesn't matter IAX2 or PJSIP endpoints. We are surprised to see such notice 
between alaw & ulaw. Codecs used for PJSIP and IAX customers EP are
!all,g722,ulaw,alaw and for providers !all,ulaw,alaw

We checked translation and tried by adding slin,slin16 on both sides, no 
changes. On 18.20.2 we didn't have this behaviour.

Answer we get from asterisk community list "If you’re using the Debian package, 
then that includes patches which are not present in Asterisk mainline.
Those log messages, and some codec translation behavior, is from one of those 
patches."

Thanks for your support

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.4
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 
'stable'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-17-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to fr_FR.UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages asterisk depends on:
ii  adduser  3.134
ii  asterisk-config  1:20.5.2~dfsg+~cs6.13.40431414-1
ii  asterisk-core-sounds-en  1.6.1-1
ii  asterisk-modules 1:20.5.2~dfsg+~cs6.13.40431414-1
ii  init-system-helpers  1.65.2
ii  libc62.36-9+deb12u3
ii  libcap2  1:2.66-4
ii  libcrypt11:4.4.33-2
ii  libedit2 3.1-20221030-2
ii  libjansson4  2.14-2
ii  libpopt0 1.19+dfsg-1
ii  libsqlite3-0 3.40.1-2
ii  libssl3  3.0.11-1~deb12u2
ii  libsystemd0  252.19-1~deb12u1
ii  liburiparser10.9.7+dfsg-2
ii  libuuid1 2.38.1-5+b1
ii  libxml2  2.9.14+dfsg-1.3~deb12u1
ii  libxslt1.1   1.1.35-1

Versions of packages asterisk recommends:
ii  asterisk-moh-opsound-gsm  2.03-1.1
ii  sox   14.4.2+git20190427-4

Versions of packages asterisk suggests:
pn  asterisk-dahdi   
pn  asterisk-dev 
pn  asterisk-doc 
pn  asterisk-ooh323  
pn  asterisk-opus

-- no debconf information


Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-08 Thread Julian Andres Klode

Hey Steve,

On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 07:38:42PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 09:25:52AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Hi,
> 
> > Am 06.01.24 um 06:51 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> > > > > - dpkg will be uploaded to experimental with 64-bit time_t in the 
> > > > > default
> > > > > flags
> > > [...]
> > > What about the suggestion to not push changes to experimental for packages
> > > that already have new versions in experimental, and do the binary package
> > > renames in unstable instead, leaving the package in experimental alone?
> 
> > How does that play together with the needed dpkg only in experimental?
> 
> > You can't build stuff for unstable involving experimental packages (except
> > manually with binary upload, which would block testing migration)
> 
> The ordering here would be:
> 
> - dpkg will be uploaded to experimental with 64-bit time_t in the default
>   flags
> 
> - the source packages which need an ABI change
>   ("source-packages"+"lfs-and-depends-time_t") and do not already have
>   versions in experimental, will have sourceful NMUs to experimental with
>   the new binary package names in order to clear binary NEW, in coordination
> 
> - once these packages have all cleared binary NEW, the new dpkg defaults
>   will be uploaded to unstable

What happened to the plan to workaround this by doing dak database
shenanigans prior to uploading to avoid binary-NEW altogether, that
I chatted about with mhy/#debian-ftp and you? Did that not work out?

-- 
debian developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free software dev
ubuntu core developer  i speak de, en


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1060274: RFS: python-acora/2.4-1.1 [NMU] [RC] -- fast multi-keyword text search engine (Python 2)

2024-01-08 Thread Bo YU
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-acora":

 * Package name : python-acora
   Version  : 2.4-1.1
   Upstream contact : [fill in name and email of upstream]
 * URL  : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/acora
 * License  : BSD-3-Clause
 * Vcs  : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/python-acora.git
   Section  : python

The source builds the following binary packages:

  python-acora - fast multi-keyword text search engine (Python 2)
  python3-acora - fast multi-keyword text search engine (Python 3)

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-acora/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-acora/python-acora_2.4-1.1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 python-acora (2.4-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * New upstream version 2.4. (Closes: #1056849, #1055707).
   * Remove python2 on B-D and pybuild.
   * Add extend-diff-ignore to fix dpkg-source -b check issue.


-- 
Regards,
--
  Bo YU



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1060265: Acknowledgement (ITP: python-django-ansible-base -- Reusable base for Ansible applications using Django)

2024-01-08 Thread Jérémy Lal
django-ansible-base is not yet published on pypi, so for now it'll stay
embedded in awx.


  1   2   >