Hello,
On 02/03/2024 09:28, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
Besides, upstream is introducing a PKG-MAINTAINERS file to
indicate the package maintainers in different distros. According to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/devel/pahole/pahole.git/commit/?id=554c5e6a2736e0b6108077c7697637f6542dd2ed
,
On 11/17/18 12:01 PM, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> you could try adding it to https://salsa.debian.org/profile/keys
Thanks, this, along with install gnome-ssh-askpass, did the trick.
I pushed the repo to salsa:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dwarves
Regards,
Thomas
I am unable to push to salsa despite my renewal of SSH keys to the LDAP
gateway.
I'll try again this week-end. If I fail I'll upload to github.com.
Hello,
Sorry I have been busy.
I am doing it today.
Hello
On 10/10/18 6:11 PM, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
Sorry for the late reply. I have been quite busy for a while but now my
available bandwidth should be hopefully better.
how is it going? ;)
I have found my git repo and I am about to create the Salsa repo. You
suggested renaming the
Hello,
Sorry for the late reply. I have been quite busy for a while but now my
available bandwidth should be hopefully better.
On 9/11/18 6:23 PM, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
Hi Thomas,
my plan would be:
0. get in some action
1. create a project on Samba
2. upload the existing git
Hello,
On 11/07/2015 03:49 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 02:36:38PM +0100, Johnny Willemsen wrote:
Hi,
Please create a pull request for the necessary changes, ACE is hosted
upstream at https://github.com/DOCGroup/ATCD/.
https://github.com/DOCGroup/ATCD/pull/156
I think we
tags 715095 + confirmed pending
tags 715113 + confirmed pending
tags 715114 + confirmed pending
tags 715115 + confirmed pending
tags 715116 + confirmed pending
thanks
Hello,
Sorry for the delay before replying these.
I am packaging latest delivery and I now understand the issues you reported.
Hello,
On 19/05/2015 18:06, alex bodnaru wrote:
Package: libace-dev
Version: 6.2.8+dfsg-1
Severity: important
hello friend,
when trying to build JAWS on i686 32bit,
the size of ACE_OFF_T is 32bit,
as opposed to the size calculated at the build
time of the library, when it is
tag 767423 + moreinfo
thanks
Hello,
the stacktrace you provide shows two messages that could explain the error:
(tracker-extract:18870): libmediaart-CRITICAL **: media_art_process_buffer:
assertion 'artist != NULL || title != NULL' failed
(tracker-extract:18870): Tracker-WARNING **: Could
Yes, that's fine. Thanks for doing it.
Original message
Subject: [Pkg-ace-devel] Bug#723856: rebuild
From: Barak A. Pearlmutter ba...@cs.nuim.ie
To: 723...@bugs.debian.org
CC:
With the binary ace packages in sid, ivtools fails to build.
Ivtools has been booted from
Original message
Subject: Re: [Pkg-ace-devel] Bug#701300: ld weak symbols or ACE problem?
From: Agustin Martin agmar...@debian.org
To: ?? ?? pashev.i...@gmail.com,701...@bugs.debian.org
CC: Debian ACE+TAO maintainers pkg-ace-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On 23/01/2013 22:16, Ralf Treinen wrote:
the source package is now available at
http://people.debian.org/~treinen/ace/
I would appreciate if you could check that everything is fine
before I will upload it to sid. If possible I would
Hello,
On 22/01/2013 23:30, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
I'm afraid Johnny was not CC'ed in your mail, do not forget to add
pkg-ace-devel to the CC list
There's no need to add pkg-ace-devel@ since bug #697848 is on ace, the
maintainer (pkg-ace-devel@) gets all mail about it.
Regards,
Thomas
Hello,
On 23/01/2013 08:33, Ralf Treinen wrote:
Relicensing is probably the best solution, generally speaking, but I suppose
it will come too late for wheezy.
Ack.
On 23/01/2013 09:08, Johnny Willemsen wrote:
Agreed, but I believe Sun intent here was to ensure that
standardization and
Hello,
On 23/01/2013 08:39, Ralf Treinen wrote:
OK. Here is what I will try tonight when I get back from work:
- repack the orig.tar.gz without the two windows executables, the TAO
source tree, and the files in examples/ that are under Addison Wesley
licence.
There is something slightly
Hello,
On 22/01/2013 13:55, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Ralf Treinen trei...@free.fr
mailto:trei...@free.fr wrote:
I may help with uploading an ace with a repackaged source if necessary.
Thanks for offering your help. I have requested a refresh on my
On 22/01/2013 21:40, Ralf Treinen wrote:
I'm more annoyed by #697848. The first two issues raised by Ansgar were
not yet discussed with upstream because I need a confirmation on what
is exactly the issue. If this is what I underlined in my reply then I
am afraid we will have no easy solution
Hello,
thanks for the report.
On 10/01/2013 12:30, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Package: src:ace
Severity: serious
[...]
the following license conditions (from 6.1.2-1's d/copyright) look quite
non-free as they restrict how the program may be modified:
I assume you are referring to DFSG#3
tags 697847 + confirmed
thanks
On 10/01/2013 12:26, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
The source for
bin/LabVIEW_RT/*.exe
seems to be missing from the source package (at least from 6.0.3-5
and 6.1.2-1). As they seem to be related to LabVIEW I suspect they
cannot be built in Debian either.
Hello,
Hello,
On 02/12/2012 18:43, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Package: libace-dev
Version: 6.0.3-5
Control: affects libdiagnostics-dev
diagnostics FTBFS on hurd (only), because ACE_OS lacks, e.g., getpid. See
tags 691880 + confirmed fixed-upstream
thanks
On 30/10/2012 18:14, Jakub Pavlík jn. wrote:
there seems to be some discrepancy between the current interface of some
underlying C library
and the Smalltalk layer that uses it.
Starting gst-browser without arguments results in a crash. Output
reassign 544035 ftp.debian.org
retitle 544035 RM: stlport5.2 -- ROM; RC-buggy; unmaintained
thanks
Hello,
2 years later no adopter stepped in, and I had no time co-maintaining
it properly.
Given that there is no longer remaining rdeps on this on I suggest that
we remove stlport5.2.
Thanks,
tags 665054 + confirmed
thanks
On 22/03/2012 13:24, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/build'
/usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_report
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/build/CMakeFiles 1
[ 50%] Building C object CMakeFiles/codiff.dir/codiff.o
Hello,
On 26/09/2011 22:24, Didier Raboud wrote:
dpkg-source: info: using source format `3.0 (quilt)'
dpkg-source: info: building dwarves-dfsg using existing
./dwarves-dfsg_1.9.orig.tar.bz2
dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, the modified files are:
dwarves-dfsg-1.9/CMakeLists.txt
Hello,
On 18/05/2012 20:51, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 08:49:39PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
Hi,
Could you point at which part of the page talks about a license change?
Urg, just saw it. They are now selling licenses...
Filing for removal of bouml then... (because the
Hello,
Thanks for your report, and sorry for the late reply.
On 18/01/2012 04:14, Ken Gregson wrote:
I believe I discovered the root cause after downloading and building ACE
and TAO libraries from the upstream sources, an experience that has
caused me to appreciate Even More the work of Debian
tags 657844 + confirmed pending
thanks
On 29/01/2012 12:11, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Source: ace
Version: 6.0.3-2
Severity: important
* debian/rules: prevent long generation of doxygen documentation in arch-dep
build by defining binary-arch: and binary-indep: targets. This requires
tags 654743 + confirmed
block 654743 by 644722
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tags 653642 + confirmed patch
thanks
Hello,
Le 29/12/2011 23:59, peter green a écrit :
unfortunately it seems that the internal compiler error mentioned in bug
644826 hits armhf (a port which afaict was in it's infancy at the time I
filed the original bug report) as well as armel. Sorry I
tags 644826 + pending
unblock 644826 by 644722
thanks
Building now with a patch similar to the one proposed here.
Regards,
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
forwarded 644722 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48660
tags 644722 + confirmed upstream
tags 644826 + confirmed
block 644826 by 644722
thanks
The issue was reported to upstream by Ubuntu maintainers (thanks to
them). Also trackable here:
fixed 630897 ace/6.0.1-1
thanks
Le 21/11/2011 04:21, peter green a écrit :
Currently this bug is marked as fixed in stable but unfixed in testing
and unstable.
There is a comment in the bug report log saying This file has already
been removed from the latest ace versions. and the file does
Message transféré
De: Thomas Girard thomas.g.gir...@free.fr
À: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Cc: pkg-ace-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Sujet: Re: [Pkg-ace-devel] Bug#636945: pu: package ace/5.7.7-4
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:20:57 +0200
Hello,
I'll make a new package
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
as per #630897 ace needs to be repackaged in stable only.
Details available at [1]; just let me know if something is missing or
unclear.
Are you OK with uploading this to s-p-u?
Thanks,
(please leave pkg-ace-devel@ in CC:)
Hello,
Le 07/08/2011 17:31, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 12:54 +0200, Thomas Girard wrote:
as per #630897 ace needs to be repackaged in stable only.
Details available at [1]; just let me know if something is missing or
unclear
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Girard thomas.g.gir...@free.fr
* Package name: combat
Version : 0.8.1
Upstream Author : Frank Pilhofer com...@fpx.de
* URL : http://www.fpx.de/Combat/
* License : BSD-2
Programming Lang: Tcl
Description
Hello,
Le 02/07/2011 18:40, Thomas Girard a écrit :
Should I upload a new ace-dfsg_5.7.7.orig.tar.gz without the pdf file
to s-p-u, and request for its inclusion in the next stable update?
Yes, please rebuild the .orig tarball to remove the file, note that fact
in debian/{copyright
Hello,
Le 02/07/2011 17:35, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
It's not just non DFSG-free - it's completely non-distributable. From
the quote in #630897:
(2) the use of the specifications is for informational purposes and
will not be copied or posted on any network computer or broadcast in any
Hello,
Le 13/06/2011 19:39, Hector Oron a écrit :
Could you please push the patch to Vcs? I am trying to see what's
going on armel build, which produces an ICE on the compiler.
I am preparing an upload of ACE+TAO 6.0.3+2.0.3 to experimental. I
completely forgot to mention that upload of
tags 630897 + confirmed fixed-upstream
thanks
Hello,
Le 18/06/2011 21:04, Johnny Willemsen a écrit :
This file has already been removed from the latest ace versions.
Good to know. But since Debian stable version 5.7.7-4 includes it, I
think we'll need a stable update for this.
Regards,
Hello,
ace_5.7.7.orig.tar.gz includes a non DFSG-free specification .pdf file:
ptc_09-10-26 DDS4CCM v1-0 WCB.pdf
Sam reported bug #63097[1] about this issue, thanks to him for pointing
this out.
ace packages 5.7.7-4 are distributed in Debian stable. The non-free
.pdf is not distributed in the
Hello,
(please keep the bug in CC:; the team is not subscribed to
debian-l10-englidh mailing list)
Le 08/10/2010 20:41, Gerfried Fuchs a écrit :
It would be nice if the long description of your packages could consist
of full sentences[1]. It somehow gives the impression like the first
Hello,
Le 11/06/2011 15:01, Thomas Girard a écrit :
I'm testing a fix for this bug.
The patch is working fine. I'm having a look at another, unrelated,
IPv6 possible bug before uploading a new release.
Regards,
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hello,
Le 13/06/2011 19:39, Hector Oron a écrit :
Could you please push the patch to Vcs? I am trying to see what's
going on armel build, which produces an ICE on the compiler.
Done in branch 6.0.1-x:
Hello,
Le 13/06/2011 20:07, Justin B Rye a écrit :
Justin B Rye wrote:
Well, there are quite a few other changes I'd apply if we were giving
it a standard d-l-e review...
Here's a patch applying most but not all of them.
Thank you very much Justin.
I need some time to read and understand
tags 629657 + confirmed pending
thanks
Hello,
thanks for the report. This is caused by libc6 2.13-5 multiarch[1]
switch; librt is now installed in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/librt.so
on i386.
I'm testing a fix for this bug.
Regards,
Thomas
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch
--
To
tags 628572 + confirmed fixed-upstream
thanks
Hello,
Le 30/05/2011 12:35, Johnny Willemsen a écrit :
The default is now error, this is correct in 6.0.2, which says:
-aeError if anonymous type is seen (default)
-awWarning if anonymous type is seen
Hello,
Le 14/05/2011 21:22, Kike a écrit :
I can confirm that after removing the file /etc/sysctl.d/bindv6only.conf and
rebooting, it works.
Thanks. I've uploaded the fix so that omniORB works with this setup as
well.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
tags 626099 + pending
thanks
Hello,
Le 11/05/2011 00:37, Duncan Grisby a écrit :
RFC 2553 ( http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2553.txt ) tells us that IPv6
sockets should accept IPv4 connections.
But this post suggests that Debian has chosen to violate the RFC and
disable it:
Hello,
Le 11/05/2011 18:20, Steve Huston a écrit :
Thomas, is this issue in Bugzilla? If not, please enter it there.
It is:
http://bugzilla.dre.vanderbilt.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=3958
I don't have an immediate reaction to the choices, but off-the cuff I
tend to favor b under configuration
Hello Duncan,
Le 11/05/2011 00:37, Duncan Grisby a écrit :
RFC 2553 ( http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2553.txt ) tells us that IPv6
sockets should accept IPv4 connections.
But this post suggests that Debian has chosen to violate the RFC and
disable it:
Hello,
Le 10/05/2011 00:24, Kike a écrit :
/omniORB: (0) 2011-04-30 17:27:38.347771: Version: 4.1.2
^
|
-- is this supposed to be 4.1.3? --+
I think version
(adding omniorb support mailing list)
Hello,
your title is rather unclear: which version 3.0 are you referring to?
Le 08/05/2011 21:14, Kike a écrit :
Package: omniorb-dfsg
Version: 4.1.5-1 http://packages.debian.org/source/stable/omniorb-dfsg
Severity: important
Hi,
latest omniorb
forwarded 622074 http://bugzilla.dre.vanderbilt.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=3958
tags 622074 + upstream
thanks
Hello,
because SSLv2 is considered dangerous, it was disabled from Debian
openssl packages[1].
This causes ace 6.0.1 packages to fail to build from source (FTBFS)[2].
We are requesting you
reassign 624893 qt-x11-free
forcemerge 624893 611255
thanks
Hello,
this is caused by #611255.
Thanks,
Regards,
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
/python-omniorb, so someone needs to
upload this now. Usually Thomas Girard does this but I don't know how
much time he has (we don't tend to be the fastest team ;-)) so if this
is urgent for the transition then maybe someone else could upload this
after checking with him?
I'll upload the fix
Package: monotone
Version: 0.48-3
Severity: wishlist
Hello, monotone 1.0 got released on March, 26th. Can you please package
it?
Thanks,
Regards,
Thomas
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture:
Hello,
regarding bug #621170 filed against gnu-smalltak for *.la removal, here
is the current situation:
gnu-smalltalk packages contains /usr/lib/gnu-smalltalk/libc.la
I'm attaching it here for the reference.
Please note that the .la file is *not* in a -dev package. It's not
intended to be
Hello,
Le 07/04/2011 09:10, Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
On 04/06/2011 09:28 PM, codeh...@debian.org wrote:
gnu-smalltalk appears in this list as a source package because one or
more of the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain .la
files.
I believe this is just the libc.la which is
Package: libsigsegv2
Version: 2.9-1
Severity: grave
Hello,
the 2.9-1 package release does not contain any library on i386:
me@machine:~$ dpkg -L libsigsegv2
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/libsigsegv2
/usr/share/doc/libsigsegv2/changelog.Debian.gz
Hello,
Le 07/12/2010 15:59, Benoît Knecht a écrit :
Hi,
I just installed bouml and tested this:
- Run bouml;
- Click OK on the greeting dialog;
- Close bouml;
- Repeat.
I get the greeting dialog every time, probably because I'm not loading
any project, and I have to admit it's
Hello,
Le 16/08/2010 15:50, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
On 08/16/2010 03:44 PM, Johnny Willemsen wrote:
Hi,
Looks a problem with visibility. What is the exact GCC version used?
That's indeed a visibility issue, since deactivating it makes the build
process complete.
I'll commit a patch for this
Le 04/08/2010 11:26, Johnny Willemsen a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Looks like the wrong config file is included.
Yes, that's Linux config file. Since Debian GNU/kFreeBSD[0] is not yet
supported upstream, we'll have to provide a working file ourselves (and
then
Hello,
Le 04/08/2010 20:22, Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
I don't know whether this info helps, but maybe it does:
From r430 until r458 you had a script debian/generate_pkgconfig.sh which took
care of the pkg-config stuff. Maybe it suffices to revive it?
Hmmm... thanks for digging into this!
Package: epiphany-browser
Version: 2.30.2-1
Severity: normal
Trying to save a file with a / in its title fail, because the default proposal
for the page
filename is the the title.
To reproduce, open the following webpage:
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS
then try to save it using
Hello Torsten,
On 27/02/2010 11:01, Torsten Werner wrote:
Thomas Girard schrieb:
as reported in #571417 omniorb4 is obsoleted by omniorb-dfsg and hence should
be removed from Debian.
just upload omniorb-dfsg without the binary package omniorb and wait for
the semi-automatic cruft-removal
Hello Niels,
On 11/11/2009 11:51, Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi Thomas
Considering that I have already added most of the dependencies for
eclipse-cdt to my list of ITA/ITPs I might as well go all the way.
Any news on this?
Thanks,
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
as reported in #571417 omniorb4 is obsoleted by omniorb-dfsg and hence should
be removed from Debian.
Thanks,
Regards,
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Hello,
Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
It's mostly because of the images and the search capabilities. What
follows is an explanation of the growth but I cannot come with a good
solution to shrink the size.
* Images:
As ACE 5.6.3-6 did not include graphviz as a dependency, images were
not being
Hello,
Do you use the .doxygen files under /etc to generate doxygen, or do you do
generate everything? For regular distributions we only use the .doxygen
files in each /etc directory.
We use (ACE_ROOT)/bin/generate_doxygen.pl -is_release
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
tags 533809 + pending
tags 550629 + pending
tags 552899 + pending
thanks
Hello,
those bugs are fixed in the SVN repo. I'm waiting for my gpg key update
to be propagated on the keyring so that I can upload them.
Regards,
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hello,
I'd like to request an adopter for eclipse-cdt, since I don't have enough
time to dedicate this package.
Current package status:
- it needs to be updated to the lastest eclipse release available in Debian
(#441313 and possibly root cause for RC bug
Package: ace
Version: 5.6.3-5
Severity: normal
Tags: pending
Hello,
I have found out what was causing #552899, and I'm currencly testing a fix
for this.
Regards,
Thomas
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1,
Luk Claes wrote:
Hi
Any further progress in getting this FTBFS fixed?
I'm tempted to remove ace from testing if this bug does not get fixed
soon. The only reverse dependency which prevents the removal will soon
be diagnostics (maintainer Cc-ed).
Please don't. I am currently busy but I will
Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Johnny Willemsen jwillem...@remedy.nl wrote:
Hi,
Is there anyone at debian who has experience with opensuse build service? If
someone can take x.7.4 and see what has to be done to the
ACE_wrappers/debianbuild package in the
Package: omniorb4
Severity: normal
Version: 4.1.0-1
The bug was fixed upstream and included in Debian package version 4.1.0-1.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel:
Package: libace-dev
Version: 5.6.3-5
Severity: normal
Hello Marek,
Hi,
Lately, I tried to compile OpenDDS from OCI using debian (well..
ubuntu) development packges. I failed because MPC generated makefiles
assumed that PerlACE/Run_Test.pm module is installed.
I propose to include
Package: ace
Version: 5.6.3-5
Severity: normal
Hello Pascal,
Pascal Giard a écrit :
If i use a protocol other than iiop, the Naming_Service throws an
error
e.g.
$ Naming_Service -ORBListenEndpoints 'uiop:///tmp/mylocalsock'
TAO (2512|3077675232) no usable transport protocol was found.
Hello Thomas,
Have you tried reproducing yur bug with dwarves 1.7? I am currently
packaging it. Maybe you can send me a test case program so that I can
close this bug report if it is fixed?
Thanks,
Regards,
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Package: ftp.debian.org
Hello,
please remove frysk from Debian; it's obsoleted by Archer[1] and no
longer maintained.
Regards,
Thomas
[1] http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/ProjectArcher
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Package: ftp.debian.org
Hello,
please remove cairo-java from Debian; it's obsoleted by java-gnome[1]
and it's no longer maintained.
frysk is an rdep for this package but I've also requested for its
removal since it is obsolete too.
Regards,
Thomas
[1] http://java-gnome.sf.net
--
To
Package: ftp.debian.org
Hello,
please remove glib-java from Debian; it's obsoleted by java-gnome[1]
and it's no longer maintained.
frysk is an rdep for this package but I've also requested for its
removal since it is obsolete too.
Regards,
Thomas
[1] http://java-gnome.sf.net
--
To
Package: ftp.debian.org
Hello,
please remove libgconf-java from Debian; it's obsoleted by java-gnome[1]
and it's no longer maintained.
frysk is an rdep for this package but I've also requested for its
removal since it is obsolete too.
Regards,
Thomas
[1] http://java-gnome.sf.net
--
To
Package: ftp.debian.org
Hello,
please remove libglade-java from Debian; it's obsoleted by java-gnome[1]
and it's no longer maintained.
frysk is an rdep for this package but I've also requested for its
removal since it is obsolete too.
Regards,
Thomas
[1] http://java-gnome.sf.net
--
To
Package: ftp.debian.org
Hello,
please remove libgnome-java from Debian; it's obsoleted by java-gnome[1]
and it's no longer maintained.
frysk is an rdep for this package but I've also requested for its
removal since it is obsolete too.
Regards,
Thomas
[1] http://java-gnome.sf.net
--
To
Package: ftp.debian.org
Hello,
please remove libgtk-java from Debian; it's obsoleted by java-gnome[1]
and it's no longer maintained.
frysk is an rdep for this package but I've also requested for its
removal since it is obsolete too.
Regards,
Thomas
[1] http://java-gnome.sf.net
--
To
Package: ftp.debian.org
Hello,
please remove libvte-java from Debian; it's obsoleted by java-gnome[1]
and it's no longer maintained.
frysk is an rdep for this package but I've also requested for its
removal since it is obsolete too.
Regards,
Thomas
[1] http://java-gnome.sf.net
--
To
tags 480132 + help
thanks
Le lundi 12 mai 2008 à 06:47 +0200, Marcus Better a écrit :
AspectJ does compile with gcj and run with gij. But the testsuite has
many failures when launched with gij; that's why aspectj is in contrib.
Oh. Can we upload it to main nevertheless with disabled
Package: diagnostics
Version: 0.2.2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
a binary NMU rebuild of diagnostics shows diagnostics FTBFS on s390[1].
A NMU will follow, as requested by the maintainer.
Regards,
Thomas
[1]
/changelog 2008-07-05 13:58:09.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+diagnostics (0.2.2+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload, as requested by Michael.
+ * Work-around a g++ 4.3 bug on s390 causing the package to FTBFS on this
+arch (closes: #489386)
+
+ -- Thomas Girard [EMAIL PROTECTED
found 432541
tags 432541 - confirmed help
close 432541
thanks
That bug got fixed with the gcc-4.3/4.3.0-2 upload.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 486373 RM: java-gnome [alpha] -- RoM; default-jdk-builddep is not
available on alpha
tag 486373 -moreinfo
thanks
Hello,
there was a copy-paste typo in my bug submission. Thanks for pointing
this out.
Regards,
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Package: ftp.debian.org
Please remove the architecture dependent binaries built from
java-gnome for the alpha architecture. It is no longer built
because default-jdk-builddep is not available on arm.
Thanks
Regards,
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
tag 481668 + confirmed
thanks
Hello Jiří,
Le samedi 17 mai 2008 à 21:45 +0200, Jiří Paleček a écrit :
Hello,
I was just about to test and close #470803, but I've found out I couldn't
even run frysk. The error message is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/dfsbuild$ frysk
libgcj failure: gcj
Hello,
Le mardi 13 mai 2008 à 11:42 -0400, clement R. a écrit :
Package: libace-dev
Version: 5.6.3-3
Severity: important
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
libace-dev does not ship with /usr/include/ace/Timer_Heap.h (which is
included by
Hello,
Le mercredi 07 mai 2008 à 07:49 +0200, Michael Koch a écrit :
sparc is not officially supported by Eclipse. What we did in the eclipse
package is to copy the native parts from another arch. Apply some sed
magic to rename packages, etc. and build the result. This should be
possible with
Hello,
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 10:49:24AM +0200, Marcus Better wrote:
I think aspectj is suitable for main, unless I missed
something. Please upload it at the next opportunity. (By the way,
1.6.0 has been released.)
AspectJ does compile with gcj and run with gij. But the testsuite has
many
forwarded 477312 http://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/issue/213
thanks
Hello,
I've just tried backporting the Swazoo race patch (that is git commit
dfd82e2fef20429c40f0deaedc2154e9c10f5802) but test 120 still fails.
The bug report continues on http://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/issue/213
Regards,
Hello,
Selon Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The old binaries from previous versions stay in unstable. So yes, you're
wrong and they should be removed from unstable.
Thanks to you and to Thomas for correcting this mistake. I've retitled the RM
bugs.
Regards,
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
1 - 100 of 271 matches
Mail list logo
