Cyril Brulebois writes:
> Philip Hands (2024-04-15):
>> On the other hand, it's taken over a month so far. Rather than living in
>> hope for another month, I thought it might be worth removing this as a
>> blocker (I've had to tell a couple of people that they'll need to wait
>> before they can
Philip Hands (2024-04-15):
> On the other hand, it's taken over a month so far. Rather than living in
> hope for another month, I thought it might be worth removing this as a
> blocker (I've had to tell a couple of people that they'll need to wait
> before they can do their salsa-CI tests :-/ )
Cyril Brulebois writes:
> Philip Hands (2024-04-14):
>> I realised that there might be a way to kludge around the current D-I
>> build failures, so I gave it a try and it seems to work:
>>
>>
>> https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_requests/45
>>
>> That creates
Philip Hands (2024-04-14):
> I realised that there might be a way to kludge around the current D-I
> build failures, so I gave it a try and it seems to work:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_requests/45
>
> That creates dummy udebs with the missing names,
Hi,
I realised that there might be a way to kludge around the current D-I
build failures, so I gave it a try and it seems to work:
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_requests/45
That creates dummy udebs with the missing names, where each depends upon
the matching
Hi!
On Thu, 2024-03-21 at 23:13:31 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois (2024-03-21):
> > I'm a bit conflicted about what to do here. At the moment, libaio1-udeb
> > is the only udeb with t64 (at least according to the output of
> > `apt-file search -Iudeb t64`); but a rebuild of the
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois (2024-03-21):
> I'm a bit conflicted about what to do here. At the moment, libaio1-udeb
> is the only udeb with t64 (at least according to the output of
> `apt-file search -Iudeb t64`); but a rebuild of the reverse dependencies
> would be sufficient (and might happen at some
Hi,
Roland Clobus (2024-03-21):
> On 21/03/2024 15:58, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[…]
> The diagram shows nicely that the t64-transition is affecting the
> installer, with currently 1 major bottleneck, libpng16-16t64-udeb:
> https://d-i.debian.org/dose/graph-unstable-amd64.png
Glad you like it,
Hello Cyril, list,
On 21/03/2024 15:58, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2024/03/msg00102.html
The diagram shows nicely that the t64-transition is affecting the
installer, with currently 1 major bottleneck, libpng16-16t64-udeb:
Roland Clobus (2024-03-19):
> For the other images, the installer is currently failing to build from
> source, as some dependencies (in the udebs) are still missing (due to
> the t64-transition).
>
> The latest message (from my local build_cdrom_gtk.log) is:
>
> The following packages have
Hello list,
Since two days the live images based on sid can be generated again
(hurray!), now that debootstrap is able to generate a bootstrap again.
The smallest image is generated properly now, because it does not have
an installer.
For the other images, the installer is currently failing
11 matches
Mail list logo
