On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 04:48:44PM -0800, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> > > About the execution of this change repository-wide:
> > >
> > > Is anyone working on feeding
> > > https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/blob/master/data/fields/obsolete-packages
> > > to
> > About the execution of this change repository-wide:
> >
> > Is anyone working on feeding
> > https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/blob/master/data/fields/obsolete-packages
> > to https://janitor.debian.net/scrub-obsolete/ so that at least
> > Salsa-maintained packages would swiftly get
On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 12:53:17PM -0800, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 at 09:00, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> >
> > On 2023-01-18 Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> > > Lintian just started erroring on 'depends-on-obsolete-package
> > > lsb-base'
Hi!
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 at 09:00, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>
> On 2023-01-18 Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> > Lintian just started erroring on 'depends-on-obsolete-package
> > lsb-base' on many of my packages yesterday. There are no new uploads
> [...]
> > Does
On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 at 15:52:34 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> I think that it is time to upgrade the warning, because I understand
> that interest in continuing to maintain systemd-sysv-generator is
> waning.
>
> I will be happy to assist maintainers who want to add a .service unit to
> their
On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 at 14:53, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
> On Jan 20, Simon McVittie wrote:
>
> > For the systemd-sysv-generator case, the LSB init script is only run if
> > there is no native systemd unit of the same name, which itself triggers
> > a Lintian warning (albeit quite a common one); so
On Jan 20, Simon McVittie wrote:
> For the systemd-sysv-generator case, the LSB init script is only run if
> there is no native systemd unit of the same name, which itself triggers
> a Lintian warning (albeit quite a common one); so hopefully if maintainers
> are removing lsb-base dependencies
On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 at 12:15:31 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> I don't think it is redundant though? Just removing the lsb-base
> Depends can break packages on partial upgrades in the same way lsb-base
> broke stuff before it grew a versioned dependency on sysvinit-utils.
Yes, ish.
The vast
On Wed, 2023-01-18 at 18:23:16 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 08:19:15AM -0800, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> > Lintian just started erroring on 'depends-on-obsolete-package
> > lsb-base' on many of my packages yesterday.
>
> It's a very low priority
Adam Borowski writes:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 08:19:15AM -0800, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
>> Does somebody know what is going on?
>>
>> Example:
>> E: mariadb-server: depends-on-obsolete-package Depends: lsb-base (>= 3.0-10)
> The severity of this warning is
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 08:19:15AM -0800, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Lintian just started erroring on 'depends-on-obsolete-package
> lsb-base' on many of my packages yesterday.
It's a very low priority cleanup; the Depends is redundant but
harmless.
> There are no new uploads of lsb-base
On 2023-01-18 Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Lintian just started erroring on 'depends-on-obsolete-package
> lsb-base' on many of my packages yesterday. There are no new uploads
[...]
> Does somebody know what is going on?
> Example:
> E: mariadb-server: depends-on-obsolete-package De
Hi!
Lintian just started erroring on 'depends-on-obsolete-package
lsb-base' on many of my packages yesterday. There are no new uploads
of lsb-base recently and I did not find any news about this topic. The
Lintian page https://lintian.debian.org/tags/depends-on-obsolete-package
is only about
13 matches
Mail list logo
