particular updates don't come from Debian; I think the one you
want is this one from security.debian.org:
http://security-cdn.debian.org/debian-security/pool/main/s/sudo/sudo_1.8.10p3-1+deb8u6_amd64.deb
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
Paul Wise:
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 1:32 PM Chris Knadle wrote:
>
>> A logical place to check or the lack of BIOS virtualization features and
>> show an
>> error message for this would be within the .postinst script for the
>> virtualbox
>> package
neither AFAICT.]
Filing a bug on src:virtualbox with severity 'wishlist' or 'normal' for this
issue to discuss it with the maintainer of the virtualbox package(s) seems a
logical thing to do.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
urces.list file and add an apt Pin-Priority in /etc/apt/preferences.d/ for
that repository (of say priority 150) such that any installed packages from the
additional repository get updated, but any not-already-installed packages from
the additional repository aren't automatically used for upgrades.
See '
nd now "feels similar" to the error you're receiving.
If by chance you've run into the same issue, that would be interesting.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
ore this process there wasn't a known path of how to deal with that. Matter
of fact that's how I started getting into Debian development in the first place.
It is unfortunately not uncommon to find a package [un|under]maintained such
that the pacakge in Debian needs salvaging.
I hope thi
ve reviewed the resulting document sections
and it looks great to me.
Thanks very much.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
real start, thereby being able to evaluate what code to run in the shell
script, but nobody likes doing that.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
um after checking a
replacement .md5sum file that comes with the overlay package. [This idea
comes from exploits on local Debian packages that I've heard about, BTW.]
The catch is that there'd need to be some way of triggering a
re-installation of the overlay if the package that the overlay is for is
reinstalled.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
that GPG keys installed by eid-archive are
signed by a DD or DM. As the debian-keyring package would come from the
main archive, that would at least have a trust path to the signing key
of the main distribution repository.
That's what I can think of at the moment anyway.
-- Chris
--
Chris
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 11:12:52 Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Am 24.02.2014 20:50, schrieb Chris Knadle:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
This package hasn't been orphaned, but there hasn't been any activity from
the maintainer
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
with maintaining this
package -- I put together the current 1.2.4-0.2 package in sid and jessie.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive
]. I don't personally think
this was because of malice or conspiracy -- it's far more likely to be some
kind of technical misunderstanding or a design issue than anything else.
[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/2/303
[2]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/3/484
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
On Friday, February 07, 2014 17:09:27 Ian Jackson wrote:
Chris Knadle writes (Re: Packaging of stunnel / MIA for Luis Rodrigo
Gallardo Cruz): ...
Well, here's the typical scenario:
- maintainer stops maintaining a package, for whatever reason,
and doesn't respond to communication
recommend requesting a new version via a 'wishlist' bug, then releasing a new
version as a -0.1 NMU. Others (myself included) have done this successfully.
As always, thanks for your continued work in Debian. ;-)
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
signature.asc
Description
Adding Gregor Herrmann to this because he and I were looking to work on
#672198 but we both were swamped with other work.
On Friday, February 07, 2014 00:02:16 Sebastian Reichel wrote:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 03:27:51PM -0500, Chris Knadle wrote:
On Thursday, February 06, 2014 13:59:59
Leaving off the MIA team on this reply, mainly because I don't think this is
news to them per se and I'd rather not spam them.
On Friday, February 07, 2014 02:54:09 Sebastian Reichel wrote:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 06:56:04PM -0500, Chris Knadle wrote:
I know; I agree with you and I think
On Friday, June 14, 2013 02:31:45, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:42:15 -0400, Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us wrote:
So right now I think that I probably just didn't know that this had been
fixed, because I haven't been using the split file configuration for
along time. I
of the fix doesn't matter much -- what matters is
that it's fixed. ;-)
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
GPG Key: 4096R/0x1E759A726A9FDD74
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thursday, June 13, 2013 08:16:02, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 07:25:34 -0400, Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us wrote:
On Thursday, June 13, 2013 06:41:16, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 08:17:11 +0100, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk
wrote:
I've just tried
-, but this
funtionality might be able to be added to the run_parts() function that
cat_parts() uses.
On servers I'm still using the abstraction via the single config method, but
I've repeatedly been tempted to use a straight exim4.conf file. [I probably
should.]
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna
On Wednesday, June 05, 2013 15:35:14, Marc Haber wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 19:53:59 -0400, Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us wrote:
On Sunday, June 02, 2013 17:10:02, Marc Haber wrote:
Exim's default in the packages is not to send authentication data over
a non-encrypted connection
On Thursday, June 06, 2013 13:18:39, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us [130606 14:53]:
I'm glad you asked this, because it prompted me to investigate further.
This was something I was told was commonly done, but it looks now like
it might be a misnomer. I'm
On Thursday, June 06, 2013 16:30:48, Roger Lynn wrote:
On 06/06/13 14:00, Chris Knadle wrote:
On Wednesday, June 05, 2013 15:35:14, Marc Haber wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 19:53:59 -0400, Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us wrote:
Attempting to use an FQDN is also troublesome, because
On Tuesday, June 04, 2013 06:31:37, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On 04-06-13 04:48, Chris Knadle wrote:
Unfortunately no: the Postfix source package looks like it's in 1.0
format, so there aren't any quilt patches.
That's not necessarily true as a result of it being a 1.0 format package
On Tuesday, June 04, 2013 13:40:56, Russ Allbery wrote:
Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us writes:
On Tuesday, June 04, 2013 06:31:37, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
That's not necessarily true as a result of it being a 1.0 format
package (there were ways to use quilt patches with the 1.0 format
Hi Pol,
probably you should patch the package using quilt.
Unfortunately no: the Postfix source package looks like it's in 1.0 format, so
there aren't any quilt patches.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
GPG Key: 4096R/0x1E759A726A9FDD74
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
-files
... [many other files patched]
The last set of lines above list the upstream postfix files that got patched.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
GPG Key: 4096R/0x1E759A726A9FDD74
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sunday, June 02, 2013 17:10:02, Marc Haber wrote:
On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 15:06:40 -0400, Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us wrote:
I can understand why one would want this, but I can also understand why it
hasn't been done. Without first setting up TLS, this would involve
passing
On Friday, May 31, 2013 07:15:36, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, 30 May 2013 19:51:04 -0400, Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us wrote:
For Exim, the one thing I would want to change would be to ship a
configuration that by default created an SSL certificate and enabled
MAIN_TLS_ENABLE
the pony. Or an otter, I like otters.
Otters are pretty cute looking. They remind me of gophers.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
GPG Key: 4096R/0x1E759A726A9FDD74
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 20:02:42, Russ Allbery wrote:
Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us writes:
On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 15:46:15, Russ Allbery wrote:
That's exactly the point, and is why I would prefer not to write those
notifications into a file that no one ever looks at. (Which
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 05:11:06, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us [130529 08:29]:
- Exim configuration is more human readable than Postifx's, IMHO.
Postfix configuration is concise but terse, and there are typically
blocks of options
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 15:48:14, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
On 29/05/13 08:18, Chris Knadle wrote:
On Monday, May 27, 2013 21:02:22, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Now that we are done with systemd for the time being, can we have the
flame war about replacing Exim with Postfix
divide that ends up
causing an electronic communications divide.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
GPG Key: 4096R/0x1E759A726A9FDD74
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
preferred solution here is to
increase the local storage enough to run exim4-daemon-light, because that's
been reliable for me.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
GPG Key: 4096R/0x1E759A726A9FDD74
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
to itself repeatedly which makes it more difficult
to grep the logs for a complete transaction.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
GPG Key: 4096R/0x1E759A726A9FDD74
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
this to 'no' will also disable queueruns from /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/exim4
QUEUERUNNER='combined'
The 'queueonly' option has a daemon that processes the queue for mail sent
locally via 'sendmail', yet has no listening port at all.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
GPG Key: 4096R
appealing, since the average
desktop user is never going to look there either.)
Somehow this problem reminds me of the event log used on a popular
operating system. Most users don't read that log either.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
GPG Key: 4096R/0x1E759A726A9FDD74
is interactive interface. Am I right?
Yes. aptitude has an interactive interface available, apt-get does not.
I think the point of the note in the release-notes is to point users to
aptitude for an interactive terminal package manager, rather than dselect.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna
can understand why you do. It can
sometimes be tricky to work around package conflicts.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
GPG Key: 4096R/0x1E759A726A9FDD74
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 07:39:44, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 27.02.2013 00:50, Chris Knadle wrote:
When this was brought up in the bug report, the response was
network-manager can be installed, then disabled, but how to do that
wasn't documented anywhere in the network-manager package
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 07:39:44, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 27.02.2013 00:50, Chris Knadle wrote:
When this was brought up in the bug report, the response was
network-manager can be installed, then disabled, but how to do that
wasn't documented anywhere in the network-manager package
/releases/testing/amd64/install.txt.en
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
built via
a buildd rather than on a DD's local machine?
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org
On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 12:45:14, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:28:14PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 05:04:55, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org [2012.10.16.0945
+0200]:
We have not cared enough
On Thursday, October 04, 2012 10:44:10 PM Philipp Kern wrote:
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 03:10:01PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
Last I looked into this [which has admittedly been a while], Bind 9 was
the
only DNS server that had actually implemented DNSSEC, and the others I
looked
://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ap-pkg-alternatives.html
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
GPG Key: 4096R/0x1E759A726A9FDD74
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive
On Monday, August 20, 2012 03:29:05, Stephan Seitz wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 07:59:00PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
Related note: I likewise repeatedly have confusion over how to deal with
testing Network Status from within shell scripts for doing operations that
require network access
/events/953.en.html
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
GPG Key: 4096R/0x1E759A726A9FDD74
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
think is worth watching.)
Finally, I want to make it clear that none of the above is meant as criticism
of any kind -- it's meant purely as an attempt to help.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serenity_Prayer
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhgtGFPTeMY
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
* what will be the *default* init system. Just
that we are open to a new alternative.
If and when there are Debian packages available for OpenRC I'd like to try it.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
GPG Key: 4096R/0x1E759A726A9FDD74
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Saturday, August 11, 2012 18:02:04, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 03:38:25PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
systemd may seem better in /most/ cases because it does have some nice
features, but I don't think it's better in *all* cases. systemd doesn't
allow shutdown/reboot
, so these seem like they'd be important to
track rather than something to ignore.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
GPG Key: 4096R/0x1E759A726A9FDD74
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thursday, May 17, 2012 10:52:02, Gergely Nagy wrote:
Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us writes:
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 06:38:49, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:10:28AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 03:17:17PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote
On Thursday, May 17, 2012 10:54:15, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:41:37AM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
I'm confused concerning the above; the point of a VCS in this context is
to track changes to the source package, and the patches are themselves
important changes
and obsolete Debian distro releases.
Just to let you know:
debian-multimedia.org has just switched domain names to deb-multimedia.org
I think this was done to comply with Debian's policy on domain name usage.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
GPG Key: 4096R/0x1E759A726A9FDD74
were new.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
GPG Key: 4096R/0x1E759A726A9FDD74
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sunday, May 13, 2012 13:41:13, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 12-05-13 at 10:51am, Chris Knadle wrote:
On Sunday, May 13, 2012 06:28:03, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 12-05-13 at 11:49am, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Mike Hommey, le Sun 13 May 2012 11:16:13 +0200, a écrit :
The versions
that works in most cases shouldn't be terribly hard
to implement. People abusing the shortcomings of the solution can still
be banned on a case-by-case basis.
It's always a judgement call. Not all judgements are going to be correct.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
GPG Key
-private: Private discussions among developers
and this list is not archived.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
GPG Key: 4096R/0x1E759A726A9FDD74
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
as they drive around.
The rigs used in cars likely aren't running a Linux OS, but the base station
nodes that receive and report the APRS traffic probably are, and as Debian has
been friendly to hams it's one of the more likely to be used there.
-- Chris, KB2IQN
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
On Thursday, May 03, 2012 17:28:29, Patrick Ouellette wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 05:13:09PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
Drat. I forgot about APRS. APRS has become fairly popular among hams, so
much so that it now comes built-in to several radios, and even HTs
(Handy-Talkies).
APRS
in getting DMA to send mail using SMTP AUTH over TLS to port
587. [The only snag was that I had to reconfigure Mutt to set
envelope_from=yes, otherwise the sending email address was invalid, but this
isn't DMA's fault. :-P]
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
GPG Key: 4096R
On Tuesday, May 01, 2012 04:53:03, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 12:48:10AM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
I think it would be useful to describe what issue(s) there are concerning
8BITMIME and why this is important. I've found some information [1]
about this, but it isn't clear
On Tuesday, May 01, 2012 11:55:20, Riku Voipio wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 12:48:10AM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
...
The quoted 2010 survey [2] showed Exim was the most popular MTA (which I
found surprising), deployment of Exim growing just slightly faster than
Postfix, and everything
, and to notify the sender on a permanent failure. Thusfar I've only
been able to find all of that in a full-fledged MTA.
[1] http://cr.yp.to/smtp/8bitmime.html
[2] http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/man.201007/mxsurvey.html
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
GPG Key
were also slow. [The
early 90's is when I was doing packet radio.]
[1] http://www.timewave.com/support/PK-232/PK232DSP.html
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle, KB2IQN
chris.kna...@coredump.us
GPG Key: 4096R/0x1E759A726A9FDD74
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Friday, April 27, 2012 03:54:51, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 05:18:35AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
This is getting OT and a better question for debian-user, so this will
be my last post regarding this issue.
On 27.04.2012 04:34, Chris Knadle wrote:
AFAICT I really
://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/openrc.git
[4] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/openrc/
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
GPG Key: 4096R/0x1E759A726A9FDD74
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
the 'quiet'
option is used, however the startup messages don't seem to be the same as when
'quiet' is turned off, even when also passing 'systemd.log_color=true'. I'll
investigate this further when I don't have something more pressing to do.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
On Thursday, April 26, 2012 16:45:08, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Chris Knadle
The default of passing 'quiet' to the kernel is also apparently picked
up by systemd, which then suppresses the daemon startup messages. If
'quiet' is removed, systemd gives colorized daemon startup messages
On Thursday, April 26, 2012 20:39:56, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 27.04.2012 02:29, Chris Knadle wrote:
Specifically I'm looking to see the daemon startup console *text*
messages, but without verbose kernel bootup noise that is gotten if the
'quiet' option is removed.
echo kernel.printk = 3
On Thursday, April 26, 2012 23:18:35, Michael Biebl wrote:
This is getting OT and a better question for debian-user, so this will
be my last post regarding this issue.
Agreed. Same.
On 27.04.2012 04:34, Chris Knadle wrote:
AFAICT I really want the 'quiet' linux command line parameter
it contains. For starters
I'm going to email this suggestion to the Developer's Reference Team.
Thanks very much.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/04/msg00486.html
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
GPG Key: 4096R/0x1E759A726A9FDD74
signature.asc
Description
.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
GPG Key: 4096R/0x1E759A726A9FDD74
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 10:21:45, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:00:43AM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
Debian has NMUs (Non-Maintainer Uploads) -- however this is mainly meant
for uploading critical bug fixes without having to resort to hijacking
the package
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 11:42:33, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:28:33AM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
The way section 5.11 is written, it implies NMUs are for bug fixes only.
It literally states Fixing cosmetic issues or changing the packaging
style in NMUs is discouraged
that is currently working on the package(s) and notifiying the
current maintainer(s) that this has been done seems reasonable.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
GPG Key: 4096R/0x1E759A726A9FDD74
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 04:04:49 PM Russ Allbery wrote:
Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us writes:
I think the above is reasonable and fits the Debian do-acracy
methodology.
At the same time, I also understand that this is a tough call to make.
Removing the current maintainer
for someone motivated, and likely to be longer. I believe
that timeframe makes the assumption that the work is correct, i.e. meets the
QA/multiarch/backportability requirements.
My personal conclusion to all this is simply something's gotta give.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wednesday, April 11, 2012 05:14:34, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 04/11/2012 06:12 AM, Chris Knadle wrote:
- if the init script left behind was part of a Debian package, deleting
the init script means removing part of the configuration from the Debian
pacakge, yet not purging the package
of whether the init script can be deleted has a
satisfactory answer, but an answer of 'no' will presumably cause an issue for
dependency-based bootup.
Any thoughts on the above?
--
-- Chris
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
a custom-built kernel (and have been for a long time).
Any idea why wicd would prevent your laptop from suspending? The best first
guess I have is perhaps a bug with the wireless card driver or firmware such
that it won't enter the suspend state.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
,
(because hijacking an ITP is just rude) before working through debian-mentors
to get a sponsored upload. This isn't simply theoretical, as a package I've
been slowly working on is in this very situation.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
it best during one of the talks
during DebConf10: Debian is software, and software can be changed. i.e
there's no reason to fear, regardless of which direction is chosen.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Friday, March 23, 2012 18:26:37, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 23.03.2012 20:07, Chris Knadle wrote:
Right now the situation may be somewhat reversed, because in the general
case, daemons need to be patched to work correctly with systemd.
This is simply not true.
Only if you want to use
On Friday, March 23, 2012 19:06:48, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 23.03.2012 23:59, Chris Knadle wrote:
Lennart Pottering during his talk said that daemons needed to be patched
to fully work with systemd, but didn't say specifically what they needed
to be patched for. If he had qualified it, I
On Friday, March 23, 2012 19:23:11, Michael Banck wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 06:59:52PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
On Friday, March 23, 2012 18:26:37, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 23.03.2012 20:07, Chris Knadle wrote:
Right now the situation may be somewhat reversed, because
AFAIK.
The bottom line is that even though it sounds like a reasonable idea in
theory, it's probably not practical to do in practice.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
it again repeatedly to no avail. [I have not yet tried systemd to test
for this kind of behavior -- if someone knows how systemd would behave in this
case I'd be interested to know.]
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201203230014.16807.chris.kna...@coredump.us
root access, and at the point an attacker has local root access
security is already moot.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive
On Sunday, March 18, 2012 04:51:10, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us writes:
On Saturday, March 17, 2012 21:53:18, Russ Allbery wrote:
Hence the Debian patent policy.
We can't just ignore
On Sunday, March 18, 2012 13:23:13, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 03/18/2012 09:50 PM, Chris Knadle wrote:
Some public discussion with the repository maintainer about this might be
warranted. Such would be worhwhile even if the outcome is not what is
desired, because at least
On Sunday, March 18, 2012 17:13:55, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 12-03-18 at 04:48pm, Chris Knadle wrote:
On Sunday, March 18, 2012 13:23:13, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 03/18/2012 09:50 PM, Chris Knadle wrote:
Some public discussion with the repository maintainer about this
might
with project goals.
The above explains the whole reason d-m.o exists.
However perhaps it also might explain the tenuous relationship d.o has with
d-m.o because d.o may need to distance itself from the work d-m.o does.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Friday, March 16, 2012 13:13:30, Patrick Ouellette wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:20:22PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
On Thursday, March 15, 2012 16:11:00, Patrick Ouellette wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 09:48:02AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Why so? If I make a copy for backup
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
