Re: systemd-dev package in bookworm?

2024-05-15 Thread Sirius
In days of yore (Wed, 15 May 2024), Sirius thus quoth: > Thank you. I will update later with results for kernel 6.9.0 and Xen > 4.18.2, how they work together. Quick feedback: it works, although I am seeing some weird log-spewing when I run things like aptitude and apt-get search. I will p

Re: systemd-dev package in bookworm?

2024-05-15 Thread Sirius
In days of yore (Wed, 15 May 2024), Simon Richter thus quoth: > Hi, Hello Simon, > On 5/15/24 10:31, Sirius wrote: > > >Where is the systemd-dev package for regular Bookworm? The only package > >that show up is systemd-dev/stable-backports 254.5-1~bpo12+3 al

systemd-dev package in bookworm?

2024-05-14 Thread Sirius
Good morning/day/evening, TL;DR version Where is the systemd-dev package for regular Bookworm? The only package that show up is systemd-dev/stable-backports 254.5-1~bpo12+3 all and if I try and install that, it seems like it wants to uninstall most of my system in the process. Roundabout

Re: Debian 12 released with two RC bugs in Sylpheed

2024-04-07 Thread Sirius
In days of yore (Sun, 07 Apr 2024), José Luis González thus quoth: > Hi, > > Debian 12 was released with two Release Critical bugs I filed on May > 20th 2023 (#1036424 and #1036388) on Sylpheed about issues that I > found on stable, and remain, with Debian 12 released later on June 10th > 2023.

Re: xz backdoor

2024-04-05 Thread Sirius
In days of yore (Fri, 05 Apr 2024), Daniel Leidert thus quoth: > Am Freitag, dem 29.03.2024 um 23:20 +0100 schrieb Moritz Mühlenhoff: > > Russ Allbery wrote: > > > I think this question can only be answered with reverse-engineering of the > > > backdoors, and I personally don't have the skills

Re: Debian openssh option review: considering splitting out GSS-API key exchange

2024-04-01 Thread Sirius
In days of yore (Tue, 02 Apr 2024), Colin Watson thus quoth: > TCP wrappers > Not used hosts.{allow,deny} for the last 17 years (since I started my current employment) so I am biased. Honest opinion is that firewall and fail2ban have pretty much obsoleted TCP wrappers. > SELinux >

Re: xz backdoor

2024-03-31 Thread Sirius
In days of yore (Sun, 31 Mar 2024), Colin Watson thus quoth: > On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:10:42AM +0200, Sirius wrote: > > Not worth boiling the ocean over, but is there an estimate of how many > > packaged projects have customisations to their autoconf that is not found >

Re: xz backdoor

2024-03-31 Thread Sirius
In days of yore (Sun, 31 Mar 2024), Bastian Blank thus quoth: > On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 08:15:10PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 05:12:17PM +0100, Sirius wrote: > > > I have seen discussion about shifting away from the whole auto(re)conf > > >

Re: xz backdoor

2024-03-30 Thread Sirius
In days of yore (Fri, 29 Mar 2024), Russ Allbery thus quoth: > Russ Allbery writes: > > Sirius writes: > > >> This is quite actively discussed on Fedora lists. > >> https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/ > >> https://www.openwall.com/lists/

xz backdoor

2024-03-29 Thread Sirius
Hi there, This is quite actively discussed on Fedora lists. https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/ https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/29/4 Worth taking a look if action need to be taken on Debian. -- Kind regards, /S