On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 10:09:40AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-08-06 at 13:54 +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
>
> > I am late to the party but as i mentioned a couple times on debian-mips
> > already i'd like to keep mipsel as a debian-port - and i'd like to
> > revert away from mips32r2
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 10:53:02AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> From what I have understood from YunQiang plans, it is currently not
> planned to import mipsel on debian-ports. Are you volunteering for
> maintaining such a port?
I am not interested in mips32r2 as i have no hardware for
Hi,
On 2023-08-06 13:54, Florian Lohoff wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 12:45:51PM +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> > Hi, folks,
> >
> > Welcome to era of Trixie, and let's talk about the future of mipsel.
>
> > So I consider to suggest drop mipsel support from the list of official
> >
On Sun, 2023-08-06 at 13:54 +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> I am late to the party but as i mentioned a couple times on debian-mips
> already i'd like to keep mipsel as a debian-port - and i'd like to
> revert away from mips32r2 back to mips2/mips3 - That change (with
> stretch) basically dropped
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 12:45:51PM +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> Hi, folks,
>
> Welcome to era of Trixie, and let's talk about the future of mipsel.
> So I consider to suggest drop mipsel support from the list of official ports.
> (And let's keep mips64el port).
I am late to the party but
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 06:24:49PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2023-07-24 23:07, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 08:36:53PM +0100, Mark Hymers wrote:
> > > On Sun, 23, Jul, 2023 at 08:36:15PM +0200, Paul Gevers spoke thus..
> > > > Speaking as a member of the Release
Hi,
On 2023-07-24 23:07, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 08:36:53PM +0100, Mark Hymers wrote:
> > On Sun, 23, Jul, 2023 at 08:36:15PM +0200, Paul Gevers spoke thus..
> > > Speaking as a member of the Release Team, but without having consulted
> > > with
> > > the others, I think
On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 08:36:53PM +0100, Mark Hymers wrote:
> On Sun, 23, Jul, 2023 at 08:36:15PM +0200, Paul Gevers spoke thus..
> > Speaking as a member of the Release Team, but without having consulted with
> > the others, I think we're OK with the removal.
> >
> > I have not been involved in
On Sun, 23, Jul, 2023 at 08:36:15PM +0200, Paul Gevers spoke thus..
> Speaking as a member of the Release Team, but without having consulted with
> the others, I think we're OK with the removal.
>
> I have not been involved in removal of an architecture before, I think it's
> the Release Team
Hi,
On 23-07-2023 17:51, Mark Hymers wrote:
On Tue, 18, Jul, 2023 at 12:45:51PM +0800, YunQiang Su spoke thus..
So I consider to suggest drop mipsel support from the list of official ports.
(And let's keep mips64el port).
Is there consensus on this point? If so, should we start making
On Tue, 18, Jul, 2023 at 12:45:51PM +0800, YunQiang Su spoke thus..
> So I consider to suggest drop mipsel support from the list of official ports.
> (And let's keep mips64el port).
Is there consensus on this point? If so, should we start making
arrangements to remove mipsel from the archive?
Aurelien Jarno 于2023年7月19日周三 14:43写道：
>
> On 2023-07-19 11:23, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-07-18 at 12:45 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> >
> > > As CIP United, we do maintain an unofficial port of mipsel.
> > > So I wish that Debian can still accept our patch to support mipsel
> > > port
On 2023-07-19 11:23, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-07-18 at 12:45 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
>
> > As CIP United, we do maintain an unofficial port of mipsel.
> > So I wish that Debian can still accept our patch to support mipsel
> > port (source only).
> > https://repo.oss.cipunited.com/debian/
Paul Wise 于2023年7月19日周三 11:23写道：
>
> On Tue, 2023-07-18 at 12:45 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
>
> > As CIP United, we do maintain an unofficial port of mipsel.
> > So I wish that Debian can still accept our patch to support mipsel
> > port (source only).
> > https://repo.oss.cipunited.com/debian/
>
On Tue, 2023-07-18 at 12:45 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> As CIP United, we do maintain an unofficial port of mipsel.
> So I wish that Debian can still accept our patch to support mipsel
> port (source only).
> https://repo.oss.cipunited.com/debian/
The closest Debian has to source-only ports are
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 12:45:51PM +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> Known supported hardwares:
> MIPS P5600
> Ingenic X2000
> Loongson 3A4000
This sounds reasonable, but do you have a list of hardware currently
supported by the mipsel port that would be left unsupported by this?
Hi, folks,
Welcome to era of Trixie, and let's talk about the future of mipsel.
mipsel port has some problems as somebody may know:
1. 2G user RAM space make some packages FTBFS, especially with LTO enabled.
2. Y2038 problem, which requires almost rebootstrap.
3. The current hardwares, include
17 matches
Mail list logo
