Bug#785329: lintian: Add check for CMake private files

2015-05-17 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Friday 15 May 2015 23:53:36 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: But I find title misleading and description too short. Moreover you should add link to normative or documentation. Why it is bad for instance to carry cmake file here ? The main practical reason why it is bad to carry a cmake file in

Bug#756158: lintian: Please make an error if Depends or Build-Depends is qt5-default or qt4-default

2014-07-26 Thread Sune Vuorela
Package: lintian Version: 2.5.24 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, In the Qt/KDE team, we have provided a couple of 'user oriented' configuration packages that sets the system up to have either qt4 or qt5 as the default Qt when invoking qmake and similar tools. But these are end user oriented

Bug#540484: lintian: new check + tag: desktop-entry-missing-recommended-key

2009-09-13 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Sunday 13 September 2009 03:45:17 you wrote: Sune Vuorela s...@vuorela.dk writes: Please don't implement this wish. (This is about having Lintian diagnose all packages that don't have a StartupNotification key in .desktop.) Not being involved in desktop package maintenance, I have

Bug#462635: lintian: Please warn if maintainer is a list and uploaders is empty

2008-01-26 Thread Sune Vuorela
Package: lintian Version: 1.23.42 Severity: normal Hi! It would be nice to get a warning of some kind if 1) maintainer is a list and 2) uploaders is empty It is quite nice to be able to see which persons is behind a package. A empty uploaders field and a list as maintainer effectively hides

Bug#458831: lintian: extra-license-file detects non-license files

2008-01-03 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Thursday 03 January 2008, Russ Allbery wrote: I'm not sure what to do with these, since they really are extra copies of the licenses without any useful change (unlike the *.html versions): W: kdelibs-data: extra-license-file usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/common/fdl-license W: kdelibs-data:

Bug#457513: N: - lintian too noisy

2008-01-02 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Thursday 03 January 2008, Russ Allbery wrote: When I add a override, I do not want to be bugged with it. This setting might be reasonable when there is just 1 binary package - but most of my packages produces many binary packages, most got some kind of lintian override, so now it is

Bug#458831: lintian: extra-license-file detects non-license files

2008-01-02 Thread Sune Vuorela
Package: lintian Version: 1.23.41 Severity: normal kdelibs-data contains a bunch of docbook snippets used to point to licenses for different licenses and languages. Such one: cat /usr/share/apps/ksgmltools2/customization/en-GB/entities/underArtisticLicense.docbook paraThis program is licensed

Bug#457513: N: - lintian too noisy

2007-12-22 Thread Sune Vuorela
Package: lintian Version: 1.23.41 Severity: normal It seems that someone filed 452804 and it is now fixed. I really disagree in that because I don't want to see output from lintian if there is nothing interesting. When I add a override, I do not want to be bugged with it. This setting might be

Bug#446097: lintian: desktop files check over strict for kde packages

2007-10-10 Thread Sune Vuorela
Package: lintian Version: 1.23.34 Severity: important Hi! KDE has a history of using desktop files for all sorts of things, not only for applications and such. for example kdegraphics, a fairly minor kde package, there is now around 10 errors and 60 warnings. If at least those checks could