Re: PyTables no longer buildable on s390x

Hi Antonio, sure, please go ahead! Best regards Anton Am Mo., 12. Feb. 2024 um 20:12 Uhr schrieb Antonio Valentino < antonio.valent...@tiscali.it>: > Dear Anton, > PyTables > 3.9 depends on c-blosc2 that in not available on s390x. > As a consequence PyTables itself is no longer buildable on

Re: Updating ortools

Hi, sure, welcome to team! it would be also good to fix RC bugs also there. Thanks! Regards, Anton Am Di., 2. Jan. 2024 um 20:15 Uhr schrieb Kari Pahula : > > Hi. > > As the maintainer of minizinc, I have an interest in ortools. I added > ortools-flatzinc as rdep for it with a recent update

Re: How to build compatible packages that use Eigen?

Hi Dima, I have been maintaining the Eigen library in Debian for over 12 years, and I cannot recall the specific bug ticket related to this topic. However, it seems that the question you have raised is indeed valid. If patching Eigen in those two places would help resolve the issue, please

Re: Packaging liblsl

Hi Enrico, from my point of view it is totally fine to upload the package under the Debian Science umbrella. Regards Anton Am Di., 14. März 2023 um 10:56 Uhr schrieb Enrico Zini < enr...@enricozini.org>: > Hello, > > I've been needing to use liblsl[1] for a personal project, I noticed >

Re: MRs on salsa and letting janitor automate things

Hello Stuart, thanks for the information! I am personally OK with the idea of committing directly to the Science packages, not sure about the opinions of other team members. But if it improves the overall package quality - I am totally for this. Otherwise, I did not find an opportunity to

Re: Veusz update to 3.5.3

Hi Jeremy! Looks good. Some notes: - overriding lintian "veusz source: source-is-missing [Documents/manual/html/searchindex.js]" please drop it from the source and use dh --sphinxtools to symlink it. - d/rules: override_dh_auto_build: export http_proxy=127.0.0.1:9 override_dh_auto_build:

Re: RFS: solvespace/3.1+ds1-2 [RC] [Team] -- Parametric 2d/3d CAD

Ok, uploaded! Thanks! Anton Am Di., 20. Sept. 2022 um 18:35 Uhr schrieb Ryan Pavlik < ryan.pav...@gmail.com>: > Ah, thanks for the reminder. I have submitted that request. > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 12:11 AM Anton Gladky > wrote: > > > > Hi Ryan, > > &

Re: RFS: solvespace/3.1+ds1-2 [RC] [Team] -- Parametric 2d/3d CAD

Hi Ryan, thanks for update. I will sponsor the package. But please note, just dropping the arch from the list of supported one is not enough to get the package into the archive. You have to request the binary removal from the archive on a specific arch, filling the bug against ftp.debian.org.

Re: ITA: glm -- C++ library for OpenGL GLSL type-based mathematics

Hi Andrea, thanks for taking care of this package! Really appreciate it. Please, follow an advices given by Pierre and we will upload the package, giving you permissions to upload it in the future. It could also be good if you add salsa-CI to be sure that the package is building aod passing all

Re: coinor packages

Hi Håvard, thanks for your contribution efforts! I have just added you into the salsa group of the debian science team. Feel free to move your repos into it. I will review your packages ASAP. Best regards Anton Am Fr., 22. Juli 2022 um 09:10 Uhr schrieb Håvard F. Aasen <

Re: Request for sponsorship - SolveSpace 3.1

Uploaded, thanks for contributing! Anton Am Mo., 11. Juli 2022 um 16:08 Uhr schrieb Ryan Pavlik : > Hello all, > > I've updated the team-maintained SolveSpace package following the > recent upstream release, and have pushed it to mentors as well as > updated on salsa. > > The previous RC1

DebConf22, Debian Science BoF

Dear all, this year we are organizing Debian Science BoF during Debconf22. It is scheduled [0]: Type: BoF (45 minutes) Room: Ereniku Time: Jul 22 (Fri): 15:00 Please use this link to add some topics to discuss [1]. It is planned to have an informal talk about Debian Science Team activities

Re: [RFS] resampy

Hi Antonio, I do not have enough permissions to move the package away from python team. I would just propose to let the package be there. The only thing which should be fixed is the binaries in the code. Regards Anton Am Di., 28. Juni 2022 um 07:49 Uhr schrieb Antonio Valentino : > > Dear

Re: [RFS] resampy

Hi Antonio, the package looks good. I would only propose to drop "resampy/data/" because they are binaries. Is there any opportunity to replace it with the text version maybe? And you are going to put it into the python-team (which I think is totally OK), but you are asking in the debian-science

Re: Migration from vtk7 to vtk9

Hi François, thanks for working on this! Yes, those bugs are filed against packages, depending on vtk6 and vtk7. I would firstly recommend finding out, whether the package has a newer version and maybe vtk9 support is provided. If not - it makes sense to contact upstream about migration to vtk9,

Re: gmp: machine-readable d/copyright and new repack

Hi Bastian, thanks for the contribution! I have just uploaded a new version with your changes and repacked upstream tarball. Best regards Anton Am So., 12. Juni 2022 um 02:09 Uhr schrieb Bastian Germann : > > Hi, > > I have just pushed some git commits that convert gmp's d/copyright file to

Re: SolveSpace update ready for review and sponsor

I have reviewed and uploaded the package! Thanks! Anton Am Mo., 16. Mai 2022 um 19:32 Uhr schrieb Ryan Pavlik : > > Hello Debian Science! > > I have prepared an updated package for SolveSpace, which I help > develop/maintain, which recently put out its 3.1~rc1 release with > substantial

Re: SolveSpace update ready for review and sponsor

Hi Ryan, thanks for the update and contribution! I will review and upload a package within the next few days. Best regards Anton Am Mo., 16. Mai 2022 um 19:32 Uhr schrieb Ryan Pavlik : > > Hello Debian Science! > > I have prepared an updated package for SolveSpace, which I help >

Re: Google Summer of Code, Debian Science

ngProjects/QualityAssuranceDebianScience Thanks Anton Am Mo., 21. Feb. 2022 um 17:42 Uhr schrieb Anton Gladky : > Dear all, > > Google Summer of Code call for Debian is announced [1]. > I am going to apply Debian Science Team as one of the projects. > > Main topic is QA-Work:

Re: Google Summer of Code, Debian Science

Hi Nilesh, yes, thanks for the reminder. I will do it today. News from the last few days beated me personally. So, it is difficult to concentrate on the work. Regards Anton Am Di., 1. März 2022 um 14:51 Uhr schrieb Nilesh Patra : > > On 2/22/22 5:36 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: > >

Re: Google Summer of Code, Debian Science

Hello Andreas, thank you very much for offering a help! Yes, it would be fine if you run the script. Best regards Anton Am Di., 22. Feb. 2022 um 11:28 Uhr schrieb Andreas Tille : > > Hi, > > Am Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 05:42:56PM +0100 schrieb Anton Gladky: > > Google S

Re: Google Summer of Code, Debian Science

a text for that. Thanks again! Regards Anton Am Di., 22. Feb. 2022 um 12:52 Uhr schrieb Drew Parsons : > > On 2022-02-21 17:42, Anton Gladky wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > Google Summer of Code call for Debian is announced [1]. > > I am going to apply Debian Scien

Google Summer of Code, Debian Science

Dear all, Google Summer of Code call for Debian is announced [1]. I am going to apply Debian Science Team as one of the projects. Main topic is QA-Work: Autopkgtests for high-popcon packages, gitlab-CI for most of packages, bringing not-in-testing packages into the proper shape to let them

Re: RFS faber - build dependency for boost-python

Hi Steffen, thanks for your work and packaging effort. I will take a deeper look into the package within the next few days. On behalf of the Debian Boost Team. Best regards Anton Am Di., 8. Feb. 2022 um 18:07 Uhr schrieb Steffen Möller : > > Hello, > > This is about > >

Re: RFS: opm-common/2021.10-3 [QA] -- Tools for Eclipse reservoir simulation files

can't see. Maybe it just needs more > time for processing? > > Markus > > Am Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:14:45PM +0100 schrieb Anton Gladky: > >Hi Markus, > > > >done! > > > >Best regards > > > >Anton > > > >Am Mi., 26. Jan. 2022 um 1

Re: RFS: opm-common/2021.10-3 [QA] -- Tools for Eclipse reservoir simulation files

Hi Markus, done! Best regards Anton Am Mi., 26. Jan. 2022 um 14:44 Uhr schrieb Markus Blatt : > > Hi, > Am Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 07:26:09AM +0100 schrieb Anton Gladky: > > > >I will upload it in the evening. Please prepare all other involved > >packages if any. T

Re: RFS: opm-common/2021.10-3 [QA] -- Tools for Eclipse reservoir simulation files

Hi Markus, I will upload it in the evening. Please prepare all other involved packages if any. Thanks. Regards Anton Am Di., 25. Jan. 2022 um 00:00 Uhr schrieb Markus Blatt : > > Hi, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "opm-common" to do a source upload: > > * Package name:

Re: Continuing packaging effort (was: Bug#994272: RFS: opm-{common|material|grid|models|simulators|upscaling}/2021.04-1 [ITP] -- opm -- Open Porous Media Software Suite)

Uhr schrieb Markus Blatt : > > Hi Anton, > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 11:53:21PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > >I have not uploaded simulators yet. So I reverted to the -1 version. > > > > Cool, I will adjust the tags accordingly if you don't mind. > > All package

Re: Continuing packaging effort (was: Bug#994272: RFS: opm-{common|material|grid|models|simulators|upscaling}/2021.04-1 [ITP] -- opm -- Open Porous Media Software Suite)

Hi Markus, I have not uploaded simulators yet. So I reverted to the -1 version. Regards Anton Am Di., 16. Nov. 2021 um 23:47 Uhr schrieb Markus Blatt : > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 11:22:02PM +0100, Markus Blatt wrote: > >Turned out I introduced two typos in the manpage in opm-simulators. >

Re: Continuing packaging effort (was: Bug#994272: RFS: opm-{common|material|grid|models|simulators|upscaling}/2021.04-1 [ITP] -- opm -- Open Porous Media Software Suite)

Hi Markus, thanks for this effort! I am also interested in this software and will review it within the next few days. Best regards Anton Am Do., 4. Nov. 2021 um 18:17 Uhr schrieb Markus Blatt : > > Hi, > > just to keep debian-science up to date (I am sorry for not CCing with the > original

Re: Request to join

Hi, Welcome on board! Added to the salsa-group. Regards Anton Am Mi., 3. Nov. 2021 um 20:39 Uhr schrieb Jose Manuel Abuin Mosquera : > > Hello. > > My name is Jose Manuel Abuin, I am a scientific software developer and a > Debian user since a long time ago. I would like to join the group and >

Re: Debian Math Team

I think we all have a very limited free time to work on Debian. At least it is my situation. Newcomers are looking for reviewers/uploaders, trying to reach a relatively large audience in d/science, sometimes for a very long time without success. How will it work in a smaller team? Doing some

Re: Debian Math Team

I do not see any benefits from creating a one-more team. It decreases definitely bus-factor of the package, will unlikely increase their quality and for end-users it is mostly not visible, in what team it is maintained. Sure, feel free to create it, if you want, but please do not move any

Re: Debian Math Team

Hi Doug, well, I think that it just increases a fragmentation. But it is up to you. Best regards Anton Am Fr., 29. Okt. 2021 um 22:04 Uhr schrieb Torrance, Douglas : > > During the Debian Science BoF at this year's DebConf, there was some > discussion of creating a team devoted to packaging

Re: Joining the team

Hi Roland, Welcome on board! I have added you into the team. Regards Anton Am So., 10. Okt. 2021 um 16:36 Uhr schrieb Roland Mas : > Hi all, > > I've been contracted by Synchrotron SOLEIL to work on packaging > scientific applications and libraries and other software used in > scientific

Re: Update Ceres Solver to 2.0.0

Hi François, thanks for the update! I will definitely check it within the next few days. Best regards Anton Andrius Merkys schrieb am Mo., 4. Okt. 2021, 08:29: > Hi François, > > On 2021-10-03 12:50, François Mazen wrote: > > I've just packaged the last version of ceres package and I've

Re: upgrading numerical libraries and sundials

Hello Drew, yes, I will prepare a newer sundials update within the next few days. Regards Anton Am Fr., 1. Okt. 2021 um 02:23 Uhr schrieb Drew Parsons : > I'm preparing the numerical library upgrade to push to unstable. > That's superlu-dist hypre mumps petsc slepc. > > I discovered that

Re: [Fwd: Bug#988474: RFS: freefem++/3.61.1+dfsg1-5.2 [NMU] [RC] -- Provides the binaries of the FreeFem++ FE suite]

should be fine. > > Let me know if I'm missing something. > > Best, > François > > > [1] https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/f/freefem++.html > [2] https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/m/mumps/changelog-5.3.5-2 > > > Le jeudi 13 mai 2021 à 22:31 +0200, Anton G

Re: [Fwd: Bug#988474: RFS: freefem++/3.61.1+dfsg1-5.2 [NMU] [RC] -- Provides the binaries of the FreeFem++ FE suite]

Your upload is fine. It fixes the FTBFS. But piuparts identified some problems with the installation of libfreefem++-dev [1]. Could you please verify whether the problem really exists or not? [1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/freefempp/-/jobs/1640984 Thanks Anton Am Do., 13. Mai

Re: [Fwd: Bug#988474: RFS: freefem++/3.61.1+dfsg1-5.2 [NMU] [RC] -- Provides the binaries of the FreeFem++ FE suite]

Control: tags -1 +pending Hi François, thanks for fixing this issue. I am testing it and if it works, I will upload it. I am not sure, whether it will be possible to reintroduce this package in testing on this stage of the freeze. Please contact the release team about that. Welcome to join

Re: [RFS] Re: Bug#987921: linbox FTBFS on 32bit with gcc 10

Your changes look good. Let's wait for approval by release team not to pollute unstable by unapproved uploads. Regards Anton Am Mo., 10. Mai 2021 um 11:40 Uhr schrieb Torrance, Douglas < dtorra...@piedmont.edu>: > On Sun 09 May 2021 05:16:38 PM EDT, Anton Gladky wrote: > >

Re: [RFS] Re: Bug#987921: linbox FTBFS on 32bit with gcc 10

Hi Doug, I will review/upload the package tomorrow, Please file a pre-approval request against release.debian.org. Thanks Regards Anton Am So., 9. Mai 2021 um 22:48 Uhr schrieb Torrance, Douglas < dtorra...@piedmont.edu>: > Control: tags -1 pending > > On Sun 02 May 2021 12:46:50 AM EDT,

Re: Packaging Open Porous Media (OPM) software suite

Hi Markus, Welcome on board! I have added you to the salsa group of the Debian Science Team. Feel free to push your projects there. I did not have a deep look into the packaging, but have some notes: - Try to use the newer compat-version. 11 is a little bit outdated. - Please add autopkgtests

Re: VTK and ParaView parallelization

Hi François, thanks for a suggestion! I have added you to Debian Science Team on salsa. Feel free to contribute! Best regards Anton Am Do., 22. Apr. 2021 um 21:46 Uhr schrieb François Mazen : > Hello, > > I'm wondering why VTK and ParaView are build with the "Sequential" > default backend

Re: ortools package

Hi Romain, thanks for interest to work inside of the Debian science team. I have added you to salsa, please push your changes there and let us know when the package is being ready to be reviewed. Best regards Anton Am Fr., 19. März 2021 um 17:36 Uhr schrieb Romain Porte : > Hello Debian

Re: freefem-sources upload

Hi Dimitrios, I have enabled the CI-pipeline for freefem. It builds, but it looks like there are some problems with piuparts, blhc and lintian [1]. Some of errors seems to be relevant (missing breaks+replaces?). Also I have shortly looked in the package and it seems d/copyright should definitely

Re: Sponsoring of packages for the next stable release

You are welcome! There is a build problem on arm64 "96 - ContactTest (Timeout)". Please fix or disable this only test. I have restarted the build but it did not succeed. Regards Anton Am So., 24. Jan. 2021 um 17:54 Uhr schrieb Stephen Sinclair : > > Great, thank you Anton, I don't think I

Re: Sponsoring of packages for the next stable release

it is not an easy one. In the meantime the package > is very useful for x86_64 users, who are in the majority. > > regards, > Steve > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 10:36 PM Anton Gladky wrote: > > > > Hi Stephen, > > > > I have enabled the salsa-pipeline on siconos pac

Re: Sponsoring of packages for the next stable release

ools to all. >* Add debian/upstream/metadata. >* Replace debian/compat with debhelper-compat package. > > > regards, > Steve > > On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 9:27 PM Anton Gladky wrote: > > > > Dear members of Debian Science Team, > > > > we are approac

Re: Sponsoring before freeze

an example of a package that uses autopkgtest in a > cmake with ctest context in mind, this could help. > > Kind regards > > Thomas > > Le 18/01/2021 à 22:24, Anton Gladky a écrit : > > Hi Thomas, > > > > uploaded! Thanks for your contribution. > > >

Re: Sponsoring of packages for the next stable release

e a review and sponsoring. I've > > done basic testing of the package myself, especially the parts that are > > affected by patches/repack, and it seems to work well to me. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Ryan > > > > On 1/16/2021 12:09 PM, Anton Glad

Re: Sponsoring before freeze

Hi Thomas, uploaded! Thanks for your contribution. Please consider adding autopkgtest for the next upload. If you prepare them before freeze, please let me know and I will upload it. Regards Anton Am Do., 14. Jan. 2021 um 00:39 Uhr schrieb Thomas Schiex : > > Dear Anton, > > I have tried to

Re: python-rioxarray

Hi Magnus, there are only recommendation, how do I usually deal with such kind of problems: > * the upstream tar ball comes with the egg-info directory. Presumably > I should remove that since it gets generated? Yes, remove. Put the wildcard in d/copyright under Files-Excluded section and do

Re: RFS: macaulay 1.17.1

Hi, I will take care of it. Anton Am So., 17. Jan. 2021 um 13:13 Uhr schrieb Torrance, Douglas : > > On 1/11/21 7:54 PM, Doug Torrance wrote: > > A new release of Macaulay2 was just announced. I've packaged it for > > Debian, and I think it's ready for upload to unstable: > > > >

Re: Sponsoring of packages for the next stable release

let me know. Best regards Anton Anton Am Do., 14. Jan. 2021 um 00:33 Uhr schrieb Ryan Pavlik : > > > On 1/9/2021 2:27 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: > > Dear members of Debian Science Team, > > > > we are approaching to a new stable release freeze. If youhave some > >

Re: RFS: robot-testing-framework/2.0.1-1 [ITP] -- Robot Testing Framework

OK, uploaded! Please add manual page for the binary for the next upload. Regards Anton Am Di., 12. Jan. 2021 um 22:46 Uhr schrieb Daniele E. Domenichelli < ddomeniche...@drdanz.it>: > On 12/01/2021 19:19, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote: > > Should I remove it from the source tarball as well?

Sponsoring of packages for the next stable release

Dear members of Debian Science Team, we are approaching to a new stable release freeze. If youhave some packages to be sponsored, please let us know. I have a very limited time, but I will try to review/sponsor someof packages. Best regards Anton OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP

Re: RFS: robot-testing-framework/2.0.1-1 [ITP] -- Robot Testing Framework

Hi Daniele, thanks for your contribution! Your package looks fine to me. I have just a couple of minor notes. Please fix them and I will upload the package. - please go through ALL files and put license information, if the copyright is different from default one (check files in cmake-folder

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new debianisation 7.1-3 of the Rheolef package

Hi Pierre, sure, I will! Please push your changes in master-branch. It looks only the tags were pushed. Regards Anton Am Sa., 2. Jan. 2021 um 19:41 Uhr schrieb Pierre Saramito : > > Hi Anton, hi all, > > I just commit with git a new release 7.1-3 of the debianisation > of the rheolef package:

Re: RFS: macaulay2 1.16.99 (experimental)

Hi Doug, I have uploaded the package into experimental. However CI-pipelines are failing for the package [1]. Could you please have a look, whether the package really fails to build or it is a CI-issue? [1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/macaulay2/-/pipelines/211610 Regards Anton Am

Re: Veusz updated to 3.3.1: please review and upload

Uploaded! Thanks for contribution! Regards Anton Am Mi., 16. Dez. 2020 um 17:37 Uhr schrieb Jeremy Sanders : > > Dear all > > Would it be possible to review and upload the update to veusz (3.3.1) > from the repository? Not much has changed since the last update except > for the upstream

Re: Veusz updated to 3.3.1: please review and upload

Hi, please push pristine-tar branch for .3.3.1. Thanks Anton Am Mi., 16. Dez. 2020 um 17:37 Uhr schrieb Jeremy Sanders : > > Dear all > > Would it be possible to review and upload the update to veusz (3.3.1) > from the repository? Not much has changed since the last update except > for the

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new debianisation of the Rheolef package

Hi, I will take care of it. Regards Anton Am Mi., 16. Dez. 2020 um 21:57 Uhr schrieb Pierre Saramito : > > Hi all, > > This is a kind reminder. > I just commit with git a new release 7.1-2 of the debianisation of the > rheolef package. > > It fixes a FTBFS bug #971933 (see d/changelog): >

Re: thank you for VTK9 and paraview

Hi, Ben, Matthieu thanks for your advices! It seems we have managed to compile vtk9 builds for most of platforms [1] (thanks to Adrian for that!). For GLES-compilation 4 patches were backported [2]-[5]. And for armel, armhf and mips issues this commit [6] did a trick. If you plan to release the

Re: MeshLab update ready to review/sponsor

gt; This will fix https://bugs.debian.org/975157 - the lone bug, a FTBFS and > thus serious. > > I'd also like to acknowledge the help of Anton Gladky in getting the > previous 2020.06 release out. > > Thanks for your reviews and sponsorship! > > Ryan Pavlik > >

Re: thank you for VTK9 and paraview

I also have problems with vtk9 on armel, armhf and mipsel [1]. On armel and mipsel it fails with: == /usr/bin/ld: ../../lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/libvtkCommonDataModel-9.0.so.9.0.1: undefined reference to `__atomic_fetch_add_8' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status == and on armhf: ==

Re: RFS: gfan

No problem, please fix it and let me know. Regards Anton On 12/3/20 10:24 PM, Torrance, Douglas wrote: > Thanks, Anton! > > Some of the builds are failing after one of my changes, so I'll likely > be making another sponsorship request again soon.  :) > > Doug > OpenPGP_signature

Re: RFS: gfan

OK, uploaded! Thanks for contribution! Best regards Anton On 11/22/20 4:57 AM, Torrance, Douglas wrote: > Hello! > > Would anyone be able to review and sponsor a new upload of gfan?  Among > other things, it fixes a failing autopkgtest on 32-bit architectures [1]. >

Re: RFS: saclib and mpsolve

Uploaded! Best regards Anton Am Di., 27. Okt. 2020 um 11:06 Uhr schrieb Torrance, Douglas : > > Hi everyone, > > I worked on two math packages, saclib and mpsolve, that recently have > gone through the NEW queue and have been accepted into unstable. > > Both of them need source-only uploads to

Re: RFS: siconos 4.3.0+dfsg-1

ill seems to build and passes autopkgtest, so I feel confident. > > kind regards, > Steve > > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 12:33 PM Stephen Sinclair wrote: > > > > Thank you Anton, much appreciated. Open to any comments. > > > > kind regards, > >

Re: RFS: siconos 4.3.0+dfsg-1

Hello, I will take care of it. Anton Am Di., 8. Sept. 2020 um 08:55 Uhr schrieb Stephen Sinclair < radars...@gmail.com>: > Dear Debian Science members, > > I am looking for a sponsor for this update to the Siconos package. I > was unfortunately unable to find a sponsor (on mentors) when I

Re: Introduction to causal dynamics

like to join the team. > > BR Ralph > > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 9:35 PM, Anton Gladky > wrote: > > Hi Ralph, > > thanks for the introduction. Could you please shortly formulate how the > Debian Science Team can be useful for

Re: Introduction to causal dynamics

Hi Ralph, thanks for the introduction. Could you please shortly formulate how the Debian Science Team can be useful for you? Best regards Anton Am So., 30. Aug. 2020 um 14:13 Uhr schrieb Ralph Alexander Bariz < ralph.ba...@pm.me>: > Hi all, > > My name is Ralph Alexander Bariz. I've written

Re: [COVID-19 Hackathon] Bazel build system pending NEW

Hi, > eigen: sometimes TF relies on new features that debian's libeigen3-dev >does not provide. In that case we have to use an embedded >tarball again. The new 3.3.8 release seems to be scheduled on 7th of september [1]. If it has features that you need, please just wait a couple

Re: Introduction and joining the debian-science/robotics team

Hello Daniele, welcome to the team! Feel free to create an account on salsa, request an access to the Science team and you can safely work on your packages there. When you are ready or have a question, you can always ask in a team. You will definitely find someone to communicate. Almost all

Re: joining the science team to package spaCy & gensim

Hello Paul! I have approved your request. Welcome on board! Please contact the team if you need an assistance or help. Best regards, Anton Paul Wise schrieb am Do., 27. Aug. 2020, 13:55: > Hi all, > > My employer is interested in having spaCy and gensim in Debian. > > https://spacy.io/ >

Re: RFS: python-jdata and python-bjdata - JData/BJData encoders and decoders for python

Hi, uploaded yesterday. Now it is waiting for review in NEW queue. Best regards Anton Am Mo., 27. Juli 2020 um 22:15 Uhr schrieb Qianqian Fang : > On 7/22/20 4:33 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: > > > I currently have "Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-python" in control and "

Re: RFS: python-jdata and python-bjdata - JData/BJData encoders and decoders for python

Up to you. Qianqian Fang schrieb am Do., 23. Juli 2020, 17:57: > On 7/23/20 11:39 AM, Anton Gladky wrote: > > Qianqian Fang schrieb am Do., 23. Juli 2020, 01:17: > >> https://github.com/Iotic-Labs/py-ubjson/tree/dev-contrib/test >> >> I can make a new r

Re: RFS: python-jdata and python-bjdata - JData/BJData encoders and decoders for python

Qianqian Fang schrieb am Do., 23. Juli 2020, 01:17: > https://github.com/Iotic-Labs/py-ubjson/tree/dev-contrib/test > > I can make a new release to get rid of this file, is that ok? or I need to > do a repack? > Yes, please. Anton

Re: RFS: python-jdata and python-bjdata - JData/BJData encoders and decoders for python

EST_ARGS=test/" in rules, the CI pipeline seems to be ok with autopkgtest for pybj Ah, OK. I missed it. Please fix the binary inclusion (do not forget to rename the tarball then). Best regards Anton Am Mi., 22. Juli 2020 um 01:41 Uhr schrieb Qianqian Fang : > On 7/21/20 4:39 PM, Anton Gladky

Re: RFS: python-jdata and python-bjdata - JData/BJData encoders and decoders for python

know if you have any additional questions regarding these two > packages. > > Qianqian > > On 7/14/20 6:07 PM, Qianqian Fang wrote: > > On 7/14/20 5:11 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: > > Hi. > > Thanks for your contribution to Debian. I have just some doubts about > usefu

Re: RFS: python-jdata and python-bjdata - JSON/BJData encoders and decoders for python

Hi. Thanks for your contribution to Debian. I have just some doubts about usefulness for Debian and possible popularity of those two projects. Do you know how many people can be interested in these two libraries? It looks like at least one of them duplicates the functionality of the built-in

Debian Science BoF, Debconf20

Dear members of Debian Science Team, I am going to submit a proposal for a BoF (birds of feather) for a DebConf20, where Debian Science Team members and other people can meet and discuss topics, connected to the Debian Science and similar. If somebody wants to join as a co-author, feel free to

Re: MeshLab package ready for review and sponsorship

Hi Ryan, I have uploaded the package. But it would be good if you have a look at some small notes: * I have enable gitlab-ci on this repo. And it looks like CXXFLAGS are ignored by the build system [1]. Please try to find the reason for this and enable vlhc test again [2]. * Please consider

Re: RFS: keras/2.3.1+dfsg-2 [RC] -- deep learning framework running on Theano or TensorFlow

Hi Stephen, I will take a look within the next few days. After meshlab. Best regards Anton Am Mi., 24. Juni 2020 um 18:48 Uhr schrieb Stephen Sinclair : > > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: important > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "keras" > > *

Re: MeshLab package ready for review and sponsorship

Hi Ryan I will take a look within the next few days. Regards Anton Ryan Pavlik schrieb am Mo., 22. Juni 2020, 21:50: > Hello all! > > I've finished up the most recent MeshLab release (2020.06) and it's now > on Mentors ready to upload. > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/meshlab > > It's

Re: [RFS] python-pweave

Hi, uploaded! Regards Anton Am So., 21. Juni 2020 um 19:56 Uhr schrieb Nilesh Patra : > > Hi, > python-pweave has a RC bug: #962104 filed against it. I've fixed this > My changes are pushed here[1]. > Needs review and sponsorship. > > [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/python-pweave >

Re: RFS: topcom

Any way - uploaded! Thanks for your contribution. Anton Am Do., 18. Juni 2020 um 20:01 Uhr schrieb Anton Gladky : > > Could you please check, what is wrong with pristine-tar file? > > gbp:error: Pristine-tar couldn't verify > "topcom_0.17.8+ds.orig.tar.xz": pristin

Re: RFS: topcom

g Torrance : > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:53 PM Anton Gladky wrote: > > I will take care of it within the next few days. > > Wonderful, thank you! >

Re: RFS: topcom

Hi Doug, I will take care of it within the next few days. Best regards Anton Am Di., 16. Juni 2020 um 00:45 Uhr schrieb Doug Torrance : > > Hi everyone, > > I've been looking for a sponsor for topcom for a few weeks now. I've > asked on the Sponsoring of Blends page and the Sage list, but I

Re: [RFS] Compyle v0.6

Hi, uploaded! Anton Am Mi., 17. Juni 2020 um 07:35 Uhr schrieb Antonio Valentino < antonio.valent...@tiscali.it>: > > Hi list, > I'm looking for a sponsor to upload the new version (v0.6) of compyle [1]. > The source code package is on salsa [2] but I an quickly upload it on > mentors.d.n if

Re: [RFS] setzer/0.2.5-1 [ITP] -- simple yet full-featured LaTeX editor

Hi Stephan, thanks for your work on a new package. I have shortly reviewed it and there are have some very minor notes:: - Please use the git-packaging schema, described in Debian Science Policy [1]. Usually we do not pull upstreams commits, but import tarball with pristine-tar. [1]

Re: RFS: lasagne update

Hi Stephen, I have reviewed this package, made some more minor changes and uploaded it. Thanks for contribution! Anton Am Do., 30. Apr. 2020 um 17:13 Uhr schrieb Stephen Sinclair < radars...@gmail.com>: > Hello science team, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the deep learning package

Re: PyZoltan (Was: RE: [RFS] zarr, numcodecs and asctree)

Valentino : > > Dear Anton, > thank you again for sponsoring the upload of pyzoltan. > I would like yo kindly ask you to make a source-only upload to allow the > migration of the package into testing. > > > kind regards > antonio > > Il 02/03/20 22:16, Anto

Re: RFS: keras, keras-applications, keras-preprocessing

: > > Hi Anton, > > Thanks for checking the package. > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 7:48 AM Anton Gladky wrote: > > > > Hello Stephen, > > > > I started from keras yesterday, made some minor changes. > > But it seems some tests are failing: > > &g

Re: RFS: keras, keras-applications, keras-preprocessing

Hello Stephen, I started from keras yesterday, made some minor changes. But it seems some tests are failing: = 14 failed, 812 passed, 252 skipped, 87 warnings in 3054.59 seconds = Please check, whether they can be skipped or the tolerance should

Re: RFS: keras, keras-applications, keras-preprocessing

Hi Stephen, I am reviewing packages and preparing uploads. Best regards Anton Am Sa., 21. März 2020 um 15:40 Uhr schrieb Stephen Sinclair : > > Dear Science team, > > I decided to check up on my packages and found that there are errors > that have cropped up due to recent updates to Python and

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

Hi Pierre, I have sponsored your package. Please consider the migration to compat-level 12. 10 is outdated. Best regards Anton Am Mo., 23. März 2020 um 18:43 Uhr schrieb Anton Gladky : > > I think I sponsored this package some time ago and I will try to have > a look again. > &g

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

I think I sponsored this package some time ago and I will try to have a look again. Anton Am Mo., 23. März 2020 um 18:33 Uhr schrieb Pierre Saramito : > > Hi Andreas Tille, > > > From Andreas: > > Currently I can only support Covid-19 related > > packages (which we try to assemble in Debian Med

Re: [RFS] Meshlab

Hi Ryan, thanks for the contribution! I will have a look at your changes within the next few days. Regards Anton Am Mo., 16. März 2020 um 17:14 Uhr schrieb Ryan Pavlik : > > The current version has some FTBFS, some DFSG issues, as well as an > issue with installing but not actually running.

  1   2   3   4   >