> Please reconsider. Otherwise the project's sole alternative may be to
> replace the Project Secretary.
>
Let me get this straight --
You (a seconder of the winning option) now believe that we need to stop and
re-open
discussion on a closed matter that the whole project voted on (which I
I agree. I also don't know if this is something we can just do with the DPL
or not.
The name master isn't great, as is ftp.
No one has suggested a name yet. If this was my proposal, I'd suggest the
debian archive team.
Why can't we just change the name without a GR between the ftpteam and DPL?
Confirmed.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021, 5:33 PM Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:16:44PM +0100, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 01:54:16PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote :
> > > Under 4.1.5 of the Constitution, the developers by way of GR are the
> body
> > > who
this mess. I don't
think trying to comapre and contrast is helpful or even relevant to this
vote at all. The technical merits are largely not in play and shouldn't
factor in to the vote too much.
Please can we stop this discussion and getting baited into talking about
the technical merits of pid 1?
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019, 4:41 PM Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > X<
> > Title: Reaffirm our commitment to support portability and multiple
> implementations
>
> ... so how does this help the project? We are all wasting lots of time
> in discussing policy and if we want to support init and
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 03:27:56PM +0200, Margarita Manterola wrote:
>
> The Debian Constitution is very well written, in a way that is almost
> completely
> ungendered. The only gendered word left is the Chairman of the Technical
> Committee. There is no reason for this position to be
system for Linux in jessie stands
undisturbed.
However, the TC resolution is altered to add the additional text above
in sections #1, #2 and #3.
** End Proposal **
Seconded.
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer
: :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C
policy via GR strikes me as awkward. I'd rather see
the maintainers in question attempt to resolve this.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer
: :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`. `'` http://people.debian.org
]: parliamentary monitoring organization
[2]: http://sunlightfoundation.com/
[3]: campaign contributions and lobbying data might do some good to try
to disspell all the evil redhat is apparently buying us all off
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer
need to consider
adding such requirement to the policy.
Getting tired of these threads :(
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer
: :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag
`- http
around.
Getting tired of these threads :(
True that. But at least this is about an actual point. (IMHO)
Word.
Still on VAC-ly yours,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer
: :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`. `'` http
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer
: :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 09:38:02PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
I second Wouter's proposal and I second both these amendments by Neil.
I also second Wouter's proposal and amendments by Neil.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer
. As much as I disagreed, I
respected the fact you always had technical grounds.
Clearly such blatent politicking tarnishes that respect, and I'd imagine
this is becoming a popular point of view.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer
: :' : 4096R
the TC decision with a GR that mentions the word init is
absurd.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer
: :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
in that resolution at all.
Why isn't this just a standalone GR asserting a position statement
about issues of the day on the coupling question?
Ian's backdoor would then trigger and abort the TC decision, so he says.
Bdale
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud
as vacating the default init TC decision is nuts. This would be a position
statement about coupling, not default init, and it seems that this is to
be interpreted as triggering the clause, as noted by it's author.
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer
,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer
: :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 06:06:12PM +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
PS: BTW, Guillem what's a status of this GR-proposal?
No seconds. Many objections.
The TC has a decision. The flame is finally smoldering out. Can we move
on as a project?
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul
is premature.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer
: :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt
signature.asc
, not for me.
Thanks,
Guillem
Much love,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer
: :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:34:08AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 03:35:40PM -0700, Don Armstrong a écrit :
-private is notified so DDs are aware.
How is the state of -private those days ? When I unsubscribed, it was still
mixing informations that are really
Hello, DPL'ers,
What work will you be doing to continue Zach's efforts to negotiate with
the FSF over Debian's status as a Free Software Distribution?
Will you treat this issue as a priority? Can we expect continued open
dialogue with the FSF on this issue? Would you be willing to help find
the
I'd ask the DPL candidates to speak a bit about how they intend to
represent Debian externally -- both in terms out downstream outreach, as
well as upstream (or even side-stream) relations.
What sort of plans do you have to collaborate with other F/OSS
communities? Other distros?
Realtedly, what
24 matches
Mail list logo
