Hello,
On Sun 01 Dec 2019 at 11:06AM +02, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I'm sorry for the delay. Maybe this reply is moot now that proposal C
> has been withdrawn but I wanted to share my personal view of why
> another proposal was needed.
>
> [...]
>
> Like I said, proposals B and D have a lot of
Hi,
On 01.12.19 10:06, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> So there's a lot about proposal B that I like, but at the end of the
> day the proposal doesn't sound that different to the status quo.
> While it says systemd, there's no 100% commitment (there's no clear
> preference over Debian kludges for
* Moritz Mühlenhoff [2019-11-30 11:48]:
> - Less ambigious, C only talks about service units and preferring other
> facilities "if they have clear and obvious advantages" (but we have no
> good method to clarify whether e.g. systemd-sysusers fulfills that over
> adduser), while F actively
* Sean Whitton [2019-11-29 17:52]:
> I would be grateful for an informal summary of why proposal F is
> thought to be needed on the ballot in addition to proposal C. What
> is thought not captured well by Sam's text, but is thought to be
> captured well by Martin's text?
I'm sorry for the
> I'd like submit the following proposal:
> Proposal: Focus on systemd to promote standardization and cross-distribution
> cooperation
Seconded.
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 10:16:10PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I'd like submit the following proposal:
I guess my second is not really needed anymore for this, but it's good to
have it on the ballot.
> Proposal: Focus on systemd to promote standardization and cross-distri
Sean Whitton schrieb:
> I would be grateful for an informal summary of why proposal F is thought
> to be needed on the ballot in addition to proposal C. What is thought
> not captured well by Sam's text, but is thought to be captured well by
> Martin's text?
>From my PoV:
- Less ambigious, C
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 01:44:08AM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 18:12:48 -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to figure out if the new proposal is redundant with proposal
> > C. The text is obviously very different, but I'm trying to figure out
> > if there are any
> "gregor" == gregor herrmann writes:
gregor> On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 18:12:48 -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> I'm trying to figure out if the new proposal is redundant with
>> proposal C. The text is obviously very different, but I'm trying
>> to figure out if there are any
Hello Martin, and seconders of proposal F,
On Fri 29 Nov 2019 at 10:16PM +02, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I'd like submit the following proposal:
>
> Proposal: Focus on systemd to promote standardization and
> cross-distribution cooperation
I would be grateful for an informal su
On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 18:12:48 -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out if the new proposal is redundant with proposal
> C. The text is obviously very different, but I'm trying to figure out
> if there are any practical differences. Understand this is not a
> criticism of this
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 10:16:10PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I'd like submit the following proposal:
>
> Proposal: Focus on systemd to promote standardization and cross-distribution
> cooperation
>
> This resolution is a position statement under section 4.1 (
On 11/29/2019 9:16 PM, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Proposal: Focus on systemd to promote standardization and cross-distribution
> cooperation
>
> This resolution is a position statement under section 4.1 (5) of the
> Debian constitution:
>
> Cross-distribution stan
Hi.
I'm trying to figure out if the new proposal is redundant with proposal
C. The text is obviously very different, but I'm trying to figure out
if there are any practical differences. Understand this is not a
criticism of this proposal, but if there are no significant practical
differences I
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 10:16:10PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I'd like submit the following proposal:
>
> Proposal: Focus on systemd to promote standardization and cross-distribution
> cooperation
Seconded.
--
Jordi Mallach
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 09:17:58PM +, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 10:16:10PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Proposal: Focus on systemd to promote standardization and
> > cross-distribution cooperation
>
> Seconded.
The message was nog signed.
Kurt
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 09:17:58PM +, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 10:16:10PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Proposal: Focus on systemd to promote standardization and
> > cross-distribution cooperation
>
> Seconded.
Let me sign this before Kur
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 10:16:10PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I'd like submit the following proposal:
>
> Proposal: Focus on systemd to promote standardization and cross-distribution
> cooperation
So I counted enough seconds and it's on the website now.
Kurt
> I'd like submit the following proposal:
> Proposal: Focus on systemd to promote standardization and cross-distribution
> cooperation
Seconded.
--
intrigeri
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 10:16:10PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Proposal: Focus on systemd to promote standardization and
> cross-distribution cooperation
Seconded.
--
Luca Filipozzi
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 04:01:38PM -0500, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
> Seconded
That wasn't signed.
Kurt
I second the below amendment.
Martin Michlmayr writes:
> Proposal: Focus on systemd to promote standardization and cross-distribution
> cooperation
> This resolution is a position statement under section 4.1 (5) of the
> Debian constitution:
> Cross-distribution standards
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 10:16:10PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I'd like submit the following proposal:
>
> Proposal: Focus on systemd to promote standardization and cross-distribution
> cooperation
>
> This resolution is a position statement under section 4.1 (
Seconded
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019, 3:54 PM Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 10:16:10PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Proposal: Focus on systemd to promote standardization and
> cross-distribution cooperation
> >
> > This resolution is a position statem
Am 29.11.19 um 21:16 schrieb Martin Michlmayr:
> I'd like submit the following proposal:
>
> Proposal: Focus on systemd to promote standardization and cross-distribution
> cooperation
>
> This resolution is a position statement under section 4.1 (5) of the
> Debian con
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 10:16:10PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I'd like submit the following proposal:
> Proposal: Focus on systemd to promote standardization and cross-distribution
> cooperation
Seconded.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 En
Martin Michlmayr writes:
> Proposal: Focus on systemd to promote standardization and cross-distribution
> cooperation
>
> This resolution is a position statement under section 4.1 (5) of the
> Debian constitution:
>
> Cross-distribution standards and cooperation
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 10:16:10PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Proposal: Focus on systemd to promote standardization and cross-distribution
> cooperation
>
> This resolution is a position statement under section 4.1 (5) of the
> Debian constitution:
>
> Cross-d
Am 29.11.19 um 21:16 schrieb Martin Michlmayr:
> I'd like submit the following proposal:
>
> Proposal: Focus on systemd to promote standardization and cross-distribution
> cooperation
>
> This resolution is a position statement under section 4.1 (5) of the
> Debian con
I'd like submit the following proposal:
Proposal: Focus on systemd to promote standardization and cross-distribution
cooperation
This resolution is a position statement under section 4.1 (5) of the
Debian constitution:
Cross-distribution standards and cooperation are important factors
30 matches
Mail list logo
