Re: Re: Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.6.0

2021-10-22 Thread Josh Innis
Hi All, I am closing this vote. We will announce the results shortly. We create value for our clients by connecting the world's data. Josh Innis Software Engineer Core R Team *P*: (831)278-0327 3945 Freedom Circle #260, Santa Clara, CA 95054

Re: Re: Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.6.0

2021-10-18 Thread Josh Innis
What would be the definition of minor modification? AGE in general tries to conform to the ideas in Postgres as much as possible. Which means we are constantly calling Postgres functions to do work and at runtime queries will switch between Postgres source code and AGE source code often. When we

RE: Re: Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.6.0

2021-10-17 Thread Felix Cheung
In such case, the inclusion of the license is required. Also, ideally, the 3rd party source code should be retained as separate source files so we could keep the license header on each file. If they are code snippet, then it is a bit of a grey area and we should attribute the source in license (a

Re: Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.6.0

2021-10-13 Thread Josh Innis
We resigned the files using an @apache.org account. There is source code from Postgres in AGE. There are no files but there are some snippets. We create value for our clients by connecting the world's data. Josh Innis Software Engineer Core R Team *P*: (831)278-0327 3945 Freedom Circle #260, Santa

RE: Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.6.0

2021-10-10 Thread Felix Cheung
There bundle also applies to the source release. However, if you are certain none of the source code file or snippet is from the Postgres code base, then, correct, you don’t need to include Postgres license info. You might want to amend the license and notice, and re-sign with a key with

Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.6.0

2021-10-05 Thread Josh Innis
Hi Felix, We do not have any binary code from Postgres. The key phrase I saw was " LICENSE and NOTICE need only be modified to accommodate them *only if their bits are bundled*." The Apache AGE repository does not have any binary source files in it. After reading the links you sent, it appears we

RE: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.6.0

2021-10-03 Thread Felix Cheung
Checking this release, not a blocker but a question: - incubating in name - signature and hash fine KEYS file - you should try to sign files with @apache.org issuer email - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE The PostgreSQL license - is it because of code file taken from the project

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.6.0

2021-09-24 Thread Kevin Ratnasekera
+1 I checked the following. - Incubating in name. - PGP Signatures. - SHA512 Checksums. - DISCLAIMER exists. - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine. - ASF headers on source files. Regards Kevin On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 8:52 PM Eya Badal wrote: > +1, I checked the follwoing: > > > x] Download

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.6.0

2021-09-21 Thread Eya Badal
+1, I checked the follwoing: x] Download links are valid. [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. [x] LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER files are correct. [x] All files have license headers if necessary. Best, Eya Badal Abdisho On 2021/09/15 16:11:47, Josh Innis wrote: > Dear Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.6.0

2021-09-21 Thread Joe Fagan
+1 On Tue, 21 Sep 2021 at 00:47, John Gemignani wrote: > +1 > >- Download links are valid. >- Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. >- LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER files are correct. >- All files have license headers if necessary. > > John > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 4:55 AM

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.6.0

2021-09-20 Thread John Gemignani
+1 - Download links are valid. - Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. - LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER files are correct. - All files have license headers if necessary. John On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 4:55 AM Juan Pan wrote: > +1, My check list, > > > > x] Download links are

Re:[VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.6.0

2021-09-19 Thread Juan Pan
+1, My check list, x] Download links are valid. [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. [x] LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER files are correct. [x] All files have license headers if necessary. Best, Trista --

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.6.0

2021-09-16 Thread John Gemignani
+1 On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 12:21 AM Joe Fagan wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, 15 Sep 2021 at 17:12, Josh Innis wrote: > > > Dear Apache Community, > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache AGE version > > 0.6.0 > > > > > > The vote is open now and until September 18th at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.6.0

2021-09-16 Thread Muhammad Shoaib
+1 On Thu, Sep 16, 2021, 16:21 Joe Fagan wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, 15 Sep 2021 at 17:12, Josh Innis wrote: > > > Dear Apache Community, > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache AGE version > > 0.6.0 > > > > > > The vote is open now and until September 18th at 10:30

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.6.0

2021-09-16 Thread Joe Fagan
+1 On Wed, 15 Sep 2021 at 17:12, Josh Innis wrote: > Dear Apache Community, > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache AGE version > 0.6.0 > > > The vote is open now and until September 18th at 10:30 AM PST and passes if > a majority +1 votes are cast, with a minimum of 3

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.6.0

2021-09-15 Thread Andrew Ko
Thank you +1 2021년 9월 16일 (목) 오전 1:12, Josh Innis 님이 작성: > Dear Apache Community, > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache AGE version > 0.6.0 > > > The vote is open now and until September 18th at 10:30 AM PST and passes if > a majority +1 votes are cast, with a minimum