Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:58 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; > > Release apr-1.6.3 [ X ] +1 looks good All good, reviewed on 3x flavors linux and Windows testing httpd 2.4.29 > Release apr-util-1.6.1 > [ ] +1

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

> On 18 Oct 2017, at 15:58, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; > > Release apr-1.6.3 > [ ] +1 looks good > [ ] +/-0 since > [ ] -1 because +1 > > Release apr-util-1.6.1 > [ ] +1 looks good > [ ] +/-0 since

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 4:58 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > Release apr-1.6.3 [X] +1 looks good > > Release apr-util-1.6.1 [X] +1 looks good > > Release apr-iconv-1.2.2 [X] +1 looks good Tested on debian(s). Thanks Bill!

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

Good to go all three on Windows. Thanks Bill for RM, and the expat notes we can solve. > Op 18 okt. 2017 om 16:58 heeft William A Rowe Jr het > volgende geschreven: > > Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; > > Release apr-1.6.3 > [ ] +1 looks

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

On 10/19/2017 1:49 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: Now, seeing Steffen's problems and what Michal had to go through to get this to build for him, so I'm -1 with apu 1.6.1. Sorry, I meant -0 as I'm not going to stop this from going out. I am still quite unhappy this was done midstream. I'll

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

On 10/18/2017 7:41 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: Two additional footnotes... On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 10/18/2017 7:58 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; I'm not there to vote yet, my

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

Am 18.10.2017 um 16:58 schrieb William A Rowe Jr: Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; Release apr-1.6.3 [XX] +1 looks good [ ] +/-0 since [ ] -1 because Release apr-util-1.6.1 [XX] +1 looks good [ ] +/-0 since [ ] -1 because Release

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

I put in under the xml folder. To get libexpat.lib double click the included lib/expat.vcxproj and convert it. Build expat The .dll and lib is created in expat/win32/bin To reduce the size of the libexpat.dll set in properties/linker/debugging/generate debug info to No. For the C99 issue

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

I've built and tested on macOS 10.12. All good. +1 (binding) Thx for RMing! > On Oct 18, 2017, at 10:58 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; > > Release apr-1.6.3 > [ ] +1 looks good > [ ] +/-0 since > [ ] -1

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 09:58:59 -0500 William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; > > Release apr-1.6.3 > [ ] +1 looks good > [ ] +/-0 since > [ ] -1 because All good on Linux. Pending testing on Mac and static review of

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

Two additional footnotes... On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: > On 10/18/2017 7:58 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> >> Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; > > > I'm not there to vote yet, my question is how did you expect us to build APU >

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

On 19/10/2017 00:58, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; > > Release apr-1.6.3 > [ ] +1 looks good > [ ] +/-0 since > [ ] -1 because > > Release apr-util-1.6.1 > [ ] +1 looks good > [ ] +/-0 since > [ ] -1 because These two all good used

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

See CHANGES, which points you to the contents of Makefile.win which documents a new variable pointed out in CHANGES, XML_PARSER, which is the name of whatever library you like. As documented everywhere, if you want to use dbm or dbd or openssl linkages, you add these to the INCLUDE and LIB paths

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

On 10/18/2017 11:13 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: > On 10/18/2017 7:58 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; > > I'm not there to vote yet, my question is how did you expect us to build APU > with a precompiled lib and this lib put where? > > Looking

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

On 10/18/2017 7:58 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; I'm not there to vote yet, my question is how did you expect us to build APU with a precompiled lib and this lib put where? Looking at both makafile.win and libaprutil.mak I see not

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:58 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; > > Release apr-1.6.3 > [ ] +1 looks good > [ ] +/-0 since > [ ] -1 because > > Release apr-util-1.6.1 > [ ] +1 looks good > [ ] +/-0 since >

[Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; Release apr-1.6.3 [ ] +1 looks good [ ] +/-0 since [ ] -1 because Release apr-util-1.6.1 [ ] +1 looks good [ ] +/-0 since [ ] -1 because Release apr-iconv-1.2.2 [ ] +1 looks good [ ] +/-0 since [ ] -1 because