Incomplete, but here's one for PostgreSQL as well
https://github.com/tshprecher/antlr_psql
--
Michael Mior
mm...@apache.org
Le jeu. 22 août 2019 à 14:38, Julian Feinauer
a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> there are some SQL dialect grammars online here (for ANTLR4)
>
>
Hi,
there are some SQL dialect grammars online here (for ANTLR4)
https://github.com/antlr/grammars-v4/tree/master/mysql
https://github.com/antlr/grammars-v4/tree/master/plsql
https://github.com/antlr/grammars-v4/tree/master/sqlite
https://github.com/antlr/grammars-v4/tree/master/tsql
They could
If you are going to do all that work to translate to ANTLR, one thing that may
help is to re-use SqlParserTest.java. (Shouldn’t be hard to translate that into
javascript, or your could use a harness that calls the javascript code from
java.) Your code may be entirely different, but the tests
It is not using ANTLR. Since our goal is specifically to support parsing
and manipulation of SQL in the frontend, we use
https://sap.github.io/chevrotain/docs/ . We're quite happy with that. We
have some pretty big ANTLR grammars for other (non-SQL) use cases and this
approach definitely feels
Create ！ Do you have the ANTLR.g4 file that can be shared ?
Best,
Danny Chan
在 2019年8月22日 +0800 PM5:45，Michael Franzkowiak ，写道：
> Danny, what is your web / frontend use case exactly?
> We've started to create some frontend helpers which you can find at
> https://github.com/contiamo/rhombic . It's
Danny, what is your web / frontend use case exactly?
We've started to create some frontend helpers which you can find at
https://github.com/contiamo/rhombic . It's all in a very early state but
we'll likely spend some more time on it in the next months. Parsing is here
I once needed to fix this issue [1] but the fix was rejected because it
introduced worse performance than it ideally should. As mentioned in the
comments, the current approach followed in the current parser is the reason
for that. I mean if we designed the grammar differently, we could've had
Thanks, Julian.
I agree this would be a huge work, but I have to do this, I’m just wondering if
any fellows here have the similar requests.
Best,
Danny Chan
在 2019年8月22日 +0800 PM2:15，Julian Hyde ，写道：
> ANTLR isn’t significantly better than, or worse than, JavaCC, but it’s
> different. So
Now some of our fellows want to do the syntax promote in the WEB page, and they
what a parser in the front-page; The ANTLR4 can generate JS parser directly but
JAVACC couldn’t.
So I’m wondering do you have the similar requests ? And do you think there is
necessity to support ANTLR4 g4 file in
