+1, I think 5.0.0 can go out and we can continue working on things for
5.0.1, 5.0.2, ..., 5.1, etc. :)
Thanks Andy!
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 at 13:49, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Status:
>
> There's code for safe compaction on MS Windows now.
>
> https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/2321
>
> There are
+1
Thanks!
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 at 20:27, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>
> On 12/02/2024 14:18, Rob @ DNR wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Built and verified on OS X
> >
> > Review notes:
> >
> >
> >* Some of the NOTICE files (specifically the one that ends up in
>
Thank you Marco!!!
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023, 10:34 Marco Neumann, wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
> Ok I will try the github issue approach here. dev@ would be too noisy I'd
> say. BTW well done with the new UI work for fuseki!
>
> Best,
> Marco
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 5:17
Hi Marco,
For things like this an issue in GitHub (I think we have labels for fuseki
and/or UI) would work IMO. And I think what you suggest is a good idea!
Some time ago we migrated to this JavaScript web application for Fuseki and
a slightly new UI. Slightly as we intentionally didn't change
I think it depends. Sometimes I approve things that look good to me, but
you might still want to request an extra review from Andy or Rob as they
know the code base a lot better.
In the same manner, if you modify the UI and Rob, Andy, or anybody else
reviews it, I am always happy to be added as a
[x] +1 Approve the release
Building OK on Ubuntu LTS + Java 17.
Cheers,
Bruno
On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 at 14:53, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a vote on the release of Apache Jena 4.10.0.
> This is the first release candidate.
>
> The deadline is
>
> Friday, 27th October
to bump it
to Jena 4, warning that there will be a jena5 soon too.
Cheers,
Bruno
On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 at 11:11, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>
> On 21/10/2023 22:51, Bruno Kinoshita wrote:
> > Thanks Andy!
> >
> > I had a go at the UI dependencies upgrade, and found some depr
).
Cheers,
Bruno
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 11:56, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>
> On 19/10/2023 22:21, Bruno Kinoshita wrote:
> > Great progress Andy!
> >
> > I saw that you created several issues for Jena5.
>
> Sorry - because it's a branch, github hasn't closed them wh
Great progress Andy!
I saw that you created several issues for Jena5. Are there any easy ones
that you need help with?
Cheers
Bruno
On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 at 17:15, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>
> On 12/10/2023 10:05, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> >
> > On 06/10/2023 11:47, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> >> There's
(Maybe we can also change the base branch of any existing pull request to
that Jena4 branch, so even in the future after we merge Jena5 into main,
those PR's could be left reviewed for Jena4 if needed?)
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Bruno Kinoshita
wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> Maybe we s
Hi Andy,
Maybe we should use rebase and merge" for PRs from now on?
>
I try to use rebase and merge as it works best for me to keep the git
commit tree in order, so I'm +1 for that.
I'd like to bring the PR in as a branch and setup Jenkins to produce
> snapshot artifacts.
>
> The branch might
+1
Building OK for me from tag on
Apache Maven 3.8.5 (3599d3414f046de2324203b78ddcf9b5e4388aa0)
Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.8.5
Java version: 17.0.7, vendor: Private Build, runtime:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd64
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: "linux", version:
+1 and I confirm the tests are now all passing on my environment
Apache Maven 3.8.5 (3599d3414f046de2324203b78ddcf9b5e4388aa0)
Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.8.5
Java version: 17.0.6, vendor: Private Build, runtime:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd64
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding:
I should have mentioned the release when I reviewed your PR too, Claude. I
think that one is OK to be included but let's wait for Andy.
Cheers
Bruno
On Tue, 18 Apr 2023, 8:54 am Claude Warren, wrote:
> I was not following the dev list and made a change to main while a release
> vote was
l to catch some bugs - when it worked!
Bruno
On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 at 21:04, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> On 17/04/2023 19:28, Bruno Kinoshita wrote:
> > BTW, for this test I deleted my ~/.m2/repository, deleted the `jena` dir
> > from my workspace. git cloned it again, checked out the 4.
:26, Bruno Kinoshita
wrote:
> Same error. Saved the log here (mvn -v output as well):
>
> https://gist.github.com/kinow/ce0435d4ffd1e4a2fcfede53735cd03e
>
> On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 at 17:42, Bruno Kinoshita
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andy,
>>
>> I am on Ubuntu 22
Same error. Saved the log here (mvn -v output as well):
https://gist.github.com/kinow/ce0435d4ffd1e4a2fcfede53735cd03e
On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 at 17:42, Bruno Kinoshita
wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> I am on Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS. I will delete my git repo, clone again, delete
> my Maven cache, a
sh order
>
> There has been one TDB1 change recently ... but why it affects the build
> in a non-deterministic way is difficult to explain.
>
> I'll try some changes and see if the GH action for Windows can be made
> to behave differently.
>
> Andy
>
> On 16/04/2023
I wonder if I have to check out from scratch again, or maybe I need to
update Maven or JDK, or use a different command?
I'm trying to build it with Java 17 (OpenJDK) with `mvn clean test install
-Pdev`, `mvn clean install -Pdev`, and `mvn clean install`. It always fails
on TDB1, failing to run
> There are some Fuseki UI PRs - which can be put into this release?
Sorry, hadn't realized there were so many UI PRs.
- https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/1792
I hadn't had time to test it, but I can start working on this one
(shouldn't be too hard, just manually test it, and then try to
Hi,
We have a new sidebar in the jena.apache.org website, that is automatically
built by Hugo - https://github.com/apache/jena-site/pull/144
The sidebar is not displayed on the landing page, and it has a different
behavior for large screens and for mobile screens.
Let us know if you have any
Not using Lucene at the moment, but the changelog doesn't seem to include
any breaking changes, only good improvements as you mentioned. I had a look
at their JIRA sorting by updated, and found no regressions recently posted
there
Hi all,
This is a FYI that the Jena website, which had been using Bootstrap 3.x,
has been upgraded to Bootstrap 5.x.
https://jena.apache.org/ (you may have to force-reload your browser tab).
Let us know if you find anything broken, or have any questions or
suggestions. I started this work
+1
Built from tag, with mvn clean install. Failed the first time, then
restarted the build and it passed.
mvn clean install
mvn -rf :jena-fuseki-core
>From what I saw yesterday, it appears to be an issue with my networking,
and others cannot replicate it. You can also disable javadoc building
I'm using same java17 version to compile, mvn 3.8.6 which is x.x.1 ahead.)
>
> GeoSPARQL isn't "core" -
>
> Andy
>
>
> On 24/12/2022 16:14, Bruno Kinoshita wrote:
> > Ok, confirmed I haven't voted. Fetched upstream, including tags. Checked
> > out jena-4.
,
n=that's not a blocker for the release I believe.
Cheers
Bruno
On Sat, 24 Dec 2022 at 10:58, Bruno Kinoshita wrote:
> I don't think I voted yet... I will have time in 5 or 6 hours when I
> return home to confirm I haven't and then test and vote.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Sat, 24 De
I don't think I voted yet... I will have time in 5 or 6 hours when I return
home to confirm I haven't and then test and vote.
Thanks!
On Sat, 24 Dec 2022, 10:14 am Andy Seaborne, wrote:
> Would any PMC member have a moment to cast a third vote?
>
> Andy
>
> On 20/12/2022 16:39, Andy
PR created to fix the port allocation. In another PR we can change how e2e
tests are executed.
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/1630/
Cheers
Bruno
On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 at 10:56, Bruno Kinoshita
wrote:
> Ah, that makes sense. The e2e tests are indeed using 3030
>
>
> https:
Ah, that makes sense. The e2e tests are indeed using 3030
https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/748fc2d0c2b3e397bd2571a29c71106f840505ae/jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-ui/src/services/mock/json-server.js#L18
If I recall correctly, there is a way to configure it so the port is
dynamic. And I'd be OK with
Looks good to me! +1
On Mon, 12 Sept 2022 at 09:18, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Like this?
>
> https://github.com/afs/jena/blob/reorg/archived-modules.md
>
> On 10/09/2022 13:30, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 09/09/2022 00:17, Bruno
> So I suggest we do not upgrade, wait to see what happens in the rest of
> the world, and close dependabot PR #1506.
>
Sounds good to me. We updated it in some Commons components recently, but
it hasn't been released yet and not sure if we will have the same issue
with the service loading.
Sounds good.
Is there a reason for not removing the directories, instead of moving to
archive? If we have a note in the README telling users who came looking for
these modules that they are now in the archive folder; we could instead
tell them to use git? Maybe point to the last commit or tag,
[X] +1
Thanks!!
On Fri, 2 Sep 2022, 3:42 am Marco Neumann, wrote:
> [x] +1
>
> Yes, issue 1499 looks like a real show stopper to me.
>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 3:55 PM Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is a vote on the release of Apache Jena 4.6.1
> > This is a bugfix release for
+1 ready to test and vote on that release. Happy to code-review that
change too (sounds easy to code-review, although hard to test and try to
reproduce the resource starvation).
Thanks Andy!
On Thu, 1 Sep 2022, 9:19 am Andy Seaborne, wrote:
> There is a serious bug in TDB2:
>
>
[x] +1 Approve the release
Tested building from tag, and then running the FusekiCmd from Eclipse, and
Jena Fuseki UI from the command line.
Added a dataset, uploaded data, queried it, and finally deleted the dataset.
No issues found.
Thanks!
Bruno
On Sat, 20 Aug 2022 at 22:48, Andy
The reply looks really good. That's the same way I feel. It looks like it
has brought more users, and that users do not mind being asked to create
issues in GH for pull requests.
Thanks Andy!
-Bruno
On Thu, 30 Jun 2022, 4:35 am Andy Seaborne, wrote:
> In the last board report, we got a request
Great improvement IMO. It should reduce the number of iterations between
dev & reporter to ask for information. And that part about the ICLA & the
link to the ASF code of conduct are also really good.
Thanks Andy!
Bruno
On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 at 04:40, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Now we are using
[x] +1 Approve the release
Thanks
Bruno
On Mon, 2 May 2022 at 03:18, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a vote on the release of Apache Jena 4.5.0.
> This is the first release candidate.
>
> The deadline is
>
> Wednesday, 4th May 2022 at 18:00 UTC
>
> Please vote to approve
Sounds good to me. +1
Thanks
Bruno
On Sun, 1 May 2022, 7:39 am Andy Seaborne, wrote:
> https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/1273
>
> PR 1273 is a contribution of a new implementation of Graph to replace
> the current GraphMem.
>
> It's faster in nearly every case and takes up less memory. There
Hi Andy,
Many are simple incremental updates so I guess we ought to just do them.
>
> fontawesome-svg-core is a huge jump but v1 is so EOL it isn't even
> mentioned on their front page. And 1.3.0 does not seem to exist asfar as
> they are concerned.
>
+1
The other big one is vue itself. Too big
+1! Thanks!!
On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 at 02:57, wrote:
> +1, thanks Andy!
>
> Adam
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2022, 7:19 AM Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
> >
> > ## Description:
> > The mission of Jena is the creation and maintenance of software related
> > to Java framework for building Semantic Web applications
+1
Thanks
On Mon, 7 Mar 2022, 04:19 Andy Seaborne, wrote:
> This is a decision by lazy consensus[*].
>
> Closes: Wednesday 9th March 2022 at 18:00 UTC.
>
>
> 1/ Enable the github issues feature, and add mailing lists
>
> GH issues -> issues@jena (new list)
> GH pull requests -> pr@jena
antly
> quieter and maybe encourage discussions as they are a little easier to
> see and track. (And have to be explain in the board report!)
>
> Andy
>
> On 17/02/2022 20:08, Bruno Kinoshita wrote:
> > I think this would be a good experiment, but definitely not the p
I think this would be a good experiment, but definitely not the place for
project decisions to be recorded (if a discussion there generates some
decision, then we'd still have to move it & document in the mailing list I
think).
But that might increase the user interaction and contribution. Will
+1 (binding)
Thanks!
Bruno
On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 at 05:32, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a vote on the release of Apache Jena 4.4.0.
> This is the second proposed release candidate.
>
> == Changes RC1 -> RC2:
>
> JENA-2265 (Fuseki UI)
> Use window.location.pathname for the Fuseki URL,
Hi Marco,
Is there a write-up or a research paper on the new UI work by Bruno for
> reference?
>
Nothing yet, sorry.
I thought about that. My initial plan was to convert it first to Vue,
address any security issues in the update, then add tests, and finally
suggest some user interface/user
reak
anything else ™, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2265
Thanks!
Bruno
On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 at 00:01, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>
> On 28/01/2022 23:43, Bruno Kinoshita wrote:
> > Build passed from tag, with:
> >
> >
> > Apache Maven 3.8.2 (ea9
Kinoshita wrote:
> Sorry, forgot to include information on how I'm building and running the
> container.
>
> ```
> docker build . -t jena-test
> docker run --rm --name jena -p 8080:8080 jena-test
> ```
>
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 at 12:43, Bruno Kinoshita wrote:
Sorry, forgot to include information on how I'm building and running the
container.
```
docker build . -t jena-test
docker run --rm --name jena -p 8080:8080 jena-test
```
On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 at 12:43, Bruno Kinoshita wrote:
> Build passed from tag, with:
>
>
> Apache
Build passed from tag, with:
Apache Maven 3.8.2 (ea98e05a04480131370aa0c110b8c54cf726c06f)
Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.8.2
Java version: 11.0.13, vendor: Ubuntu, runtime:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: "linux", version:
during lunch time,
or later this afternoon (~10AM here).
Cheers
Bruno
On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 08:55, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>
> On 24/01/2022 18:46, Bruno Kinoshita wrote:
> > Taking a look at it today. In another project I bumped the version of
> Yarn
> > to v3 (we
Taking a look at it today. In another project I bumped the version of Yarn
to v3 (we are using v1 I think, v2 is stable, v3 is the greatest and
latest). Will see if that solves the changes in the lock file, and also
look why the build is failing.
On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 06:38, Andy Seaborne
52 matches
Mail list logo
