Anyone have any info on open source projects with javax.comm? Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30188.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30193.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30194.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30188.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23255.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30188.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 13:15:45 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote:
Personally, I want to stay focused on the code part first, and
would prefer someone more familiar with Maven and xml-html
transformations would focus on the site module.
What I'm thinking is that we should use an infrastructure
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:48:35 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote:
I was just following the usual conventions in the Subversion book,
and am not attached to the location (svn move and svn copy are *
sweet*). But first, a question ... if we are thinking about
actually keeping the end result, wouldn't it
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:05:14 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:48:35 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote:
I was just following the usual conventions in the Subversion book,
and am not attached to the location (svn move and svn copy are *
sweet*). But first, a question
Hi All,
I am currently using for loops and iterators for traversing arrays and coolections in
JSP.
I am planning to use this logic : iterate tag in place of this.
I need to know if there is any advantage of using this tag in terms of performance or
reduction in Java code in JSP etc.
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 08:52:21 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 14:56:45 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote:
* Separate modules for independently releaseable artifacts.
* Modules can depend on each other (i.e. pretty much all will
depend on core), but we should
+1 to all of this. :-)
One point about dependencies on 'core', though. It's seldom likely to
be as clear cut as depending on core or not. For example, it's likely
that, once we split out Tiles, there will still be some glue that
depends on 'core', even if Tiles per se does not. Then the question
13 matches
Mail list logo
