From: Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/24/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe the intent was that Standalone Tiles should rely on Servlets
2.3 and JSP 1.2, as does Struts Classic. I hope that's still the case,
and that we just need to fix up Tiles to conform to that.
Martin-
there is also an issue with the Maven build for Tiles standalone.
the dtds are not inside the jar file, *after* maven build
see here:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36096
-Matthias
-Original Message-
From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18981.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22633.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25023.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project struts-core has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project struts-core has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
Do we even care about gump failures? (See below)
I have 3 line fix for this.
$svn mv build.xml build.legacy.xml
$maven ant
$svn add build.xml
Then doing ...
$ant dist
...(which is what gump is doing) takes me 1 min and 4 seconds if it
has to download the dependencies.
Craig, I believe
+1
That's pretty much my experience too.
So, with that said, can we move standalone to subproject level or are
we waiting on something?
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance
EdgeTech, Inc.
http://www.edgetechservices.net/
On Aug 25, 2005, at 12:28 AM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
However, I've got a separate / semi-related question. Given that
we're changing package names anyway, it would be really cool to
abstract away the servlet API specific calling sequences, so that
standalone Tiles could work equally
On Aug 25, 2005, at 1:44 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Martin-
there is also an issue with the Maven build for Tiles standalone.
the dtds are not inside the jar file, *after* maven build
Make sure you're svn copy is up to date. I believe Wendy fixed that.
If I run maven jar I get the DTDs
So, with that said, can we move standalone to subproject
level or are
we waiting on something?
A sublevel project of Struts sounds fine,
but here is also a proposal from Ted, since Tiles
is used by others like Velocity or MyFaces
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/TilesTopLevel
-Matthias
ok, fine.
:-)
I'll look at it, thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Reddin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 3:26 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Standalone Tiles - JSP version tld file
On Aug 25, 2005, at 1:44 AM, Matthias Wessendorf
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36096.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
fine,
I'll close that bug
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 4:17 PM
To: Matthias Wessendorf
Subject: Re: Standalone Tiles - JSP version tld file
From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
there is also an issue with the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36037.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36037.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 8/25/05, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we even care about gump failures? (See below)
I have 3 line fix for this.
$svn mv build.xml build.legacy.xml
$maven ant
$svn add build.xml
Then doing ...
$ant dist
...(which is what gump is doing) takes me 1 min and 4
On 8/25/05, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 25, 2005, at 12:28 AM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
However, I've got a separate / semi-related question. Given that
we're changing package names anyway, it would be really cool to
abstract away the servlet API specific calling
On 8/25/05, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
That's pretty much my experience too.
So, with that said, can we move standalone to subproject level or are
we waiting on something?
One interesting wrinkle is that Integrated Tiles (the version that
has org.apache.struts.tiles
On 8/25/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My preference would definitely be to support only one version, with
that version being the one we expect to support in future releases.
So, +1 for supporting Standalone Tiles only.
+1
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by GaryVanMatre:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease100
--
||
Dakota Jack wrote:
First, comparing Struts and JSF is like comparing C++ and Visual
Basic. Struts is REQUEST-DRIVEN MVC and JSF (Shale) is PAGE CENTRIC
RAD (rapid development with tools as in VB). Anyone that cannot see
they don't go together, frankly, is not that insightful, in my
opinion.
I'll go ahead and commit what I have. Mine should be up to date.
If not, we can always fix it later. But 'almost up to date and
working' is always better than 'broken' :)
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance
EdgeTech, Inc.
Author: jmitchell
Date: Thu Aug 25 11:36:19 2005
New Revision: 240115
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=240115view=rev
Log:
build.xml - maven generated (part 1)
Added:
struts/core/trunk/build.legacy.xml
- copied unchanged from r234507, struts/core/trunk/build.xml
Removed:
Author: jmitchell
Date: Thu Aug 25 11:37:16 2005
New Revision: 240116
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=240116view=rev
Log:
build.xml - maven generated (part 2)
Added:
struts/core/trunk/build.xml (with props)
Added: struts/core/trunk/build.xml
URL:
On 8/25/05, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we even care about gump failures? (See below)
We certainly should, yes.
--
Martin Cooper
I have 3 line fix for this.
$svn mv build.xml build.legacy.xml
$maven ant
$svn add build.xml
Then doing ...
$ant dist
...(which is
Le 05-08-25 à 10:53, Craig McClanahan a écrit :
On 8/25/05, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 25, 2005, at 12:28 AM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
However, I've got a separate / semi-related question. Given that
we're changing package names anyway, it would be really cool to
abstract
On 8/25/05, David Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 05-08-25 à 10:53, Craig McClanahan a écrit :
On 8/25/05, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 25, 2005, at 12:28 AM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
However, I've got a separate / semi-related question. Given that
we're changing
On Aug 25, 2005, at 1:55 PM, David Geary wrote:
I'm +1 for this, but should we make plugging standalone Tiles back
into Struts
a priority and tackle this once that's done? Perhaps it's unfounded,
but I'm
concerned that the current Tiles will change if we don't act quickly.
If Tiles needs
Ok, i just checked in the new build.xml, so this should make gump
happy (for core at least). I'm not sure if this will bomb for the
other projects. If it does, then I'll do the same for the others.
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
Consulting / Mentoring /
On 8/25/05, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 25, 2005, at 1:55 PM, David Geary wrote:
I'm +1 for this, but should we make plugging standalone Tiles back
into Struts
a priority and tackle this once that's done? Perhaps it's unfounded,
but I'm
concerned that the current Tiles
On 8/25/05, David Durham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, I'm following this list off and on, but fairly regularly, I
don't recall anyone else saying hey, this shouldn't be in struts. I
have no doubt that others feel the way you do, just interested in some
names that's all. I don't think
Le 05-08-25 à 13:24, Craig McClanahan a écrit :
On 8/25/05, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 25, 2005, at 1:55 PM, David Geary wrote:
I'm +1 for this, but should we make plugging standalone Tiles back
into Struts
a priority and tackle this once that's done? Perhaps it's
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by CraigMcClanahan:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsShale
The comment on the change is:
Add some resource pointers for pure JSF help
(Moving to dev.)
I already started to take a look at this sometime ago. (In fact, I
had to make sure I didn't check in changes I shouldn't while I was
working on those deprecations.) The thing I ran into was, the result
I'd get wasn't always fully reliable. If a forward of an action had a
At 3:20 PM -0500 8/25/05, Hubert Rabago wrote:
(Moving to dev.)
I already started to take a look at this sometime ago. (In fact, I
had to make sure I didn't check in changes I shouldn't while I was
working on those deprecations.) The thing I ran into was, the result
I'd get wasn't always
On 8/25/05, Hubert Rabago [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll revisit the work I've already done one of these days and share my
observations.
...but don't let me keep you from working on this! If you have the
itch then by all means go ahead and take it on!
Hubert
On 8/25/05, Joe Germuska [EMAIL
On 8/25/05, Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure that's part of it -- but in my book, even just telling
people which file has the problem would help a lot; at least, in my
case, where we make a myriad of config files to make things easier to
manage. There are also probably just
If you guys are ready to do the work, I'd say let's just do it, and we
can use Tiles subproject with Classic 1.3.x. We're shipping
subprojects in this release series, and we might as well just ship
them all and be done with it. Having two versions of Tiles is likely
to cause more confusion than
40 matches
Mail list logo
