DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31293.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31291.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Date: 2004-09-21T06:13:12
Editor: NiallPemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsUpgradeNotes11to124
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsUpgradeNotes11to124
no comment
Change Log:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31340.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
You know Martin, I was all set to reply with two or three points that I
THOUGHT were valid against this, but as I started writing them up (I think
three or four messages began and aborted!) I decided what you've done I
actually DO like! :)
The one comment that remains is this... The approach I
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31291.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Date: 2004-09-21T07:17:10
Editor: KrisSchneider [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: JavaBeans
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/JavaBeans
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -2,6 +2,9 @@
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31340.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Thanks for your comments, Michael. If you've been following the dev
list lately, you've seen some beginning discussions on a Struts 2.0
rearchitecting that would indeed leverage everything we've all learned
in the four years since Struts was first created. I have some
specific proposals to make
Date: 2004-09-21T07:32:49
Editor: NiallPemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsDeprecatedActionErrors
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsDeprecatedActionErrors
no comment
Change Log:
Date: 2004-09-21T07:35:03
Editor: NiallPemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsUpgradeNotes11to124
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsUpgradeNotes11to124
no comment
Change Log:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31340.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Date: 2004-09-21T07:59:48
Editor: KrisSchneider [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: ExposedBeanProperties
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ExposedBeanProperties
no comment
New Page:
##language:en
#pragma section-numbers off
Here's a utility class that will dump
Date: 2004-09-21T08:50:56
Editor: NiallPemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsRelease12
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease12
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -1,8
Date: 2004-09-21T08:55:31
Editor: NiallPemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsNewFaqs
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsNewFaqs
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -24,7 +24,7
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31293.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31320.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Craig,
In the near future, you'll also see the initial release
candidate of the Struts-Faces integration library (packaged
separately from the rest of Struts) that allows JavaServer
Faces to be used with Struts 1.1 or 1.2 based applications,
including the use of the Tiles Framework and
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Craig,
Btw. like Michael, I am interessted in your proposals on
Struts 2.0 too :)
Checkout this:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-chain
.V
--
Please post on Rich Internet Applications User Interface (RiA/SoA)
http://www.portalvu.com
Since the thread I originally started with regard to a BLOB download
Action kind of veered off into a different territory, I was hoping
starting a new thread could the discussion get back on topic. I have a
bit of a vested interest in this now because I started the discussion and
I hate leaving
Date: 2004-09-21T11:29:13
Editor: KrisSchneider [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: BeanPropertyNames
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/BeanPropertyNames
no comment
New Page:
##language:en
#pragma section-numbers off
The rules for property names are really
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31348.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
+1
We have have graph generating actions using JFreeChart and pdf generating
actions using iText and none of them use any of the attributes that your
blob action has - so leaving that abstract is a good idea IMO.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: Deadman, Hal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
fixed
- robert
On 21 Sep 2004, at 15:50, Vic wrote:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.cgi
It be great if it.. did something else.
.V
--
Please post on Rich Internet Applications User Interface (RiA/SoA)
http://www.portalvu.com
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31351.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
You won't need to make all the action mappings have to be the same type.
You can use the action className= attribute to change the type of
one particular action mapping. (I think, haven't done it myself)
action
className The fully qualified Java class name of the ActionMapping
(1) Extend ActionMapping and have accessors and mutators for all the
extra attributes needed (whatever they may actually be, still open for
debate)
Admitting that I haven't been following this thread closely...
please, base the Action on an interface, not a concrete subclass of
ActionMapping
Why are you asking questions with a bug tracking system?
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
EdgeTech, Inc.
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 3:43 PM
Subject: DO NOT
Did you really mean to say don't base the ACTION on a concrete subclass?
If so, I'm a bit confused (which is my usual state of being, so all is
well)...
The way I am looking at it, the only thing I'm extending is the
ActionConfig, which is a class. The Action Martin wrote of course extends
Looking at the RequestProcessor code there are some casts to
ActionMapping so you probably need to extend that rather than
ActionConfig. You will also be extending Martin's DownloadAction
abstract class to write a version that knows how to instantiate a
StreamInfo from mapping properties. I don't
At 4:42 PM -0400 9/21/04, Deadman, Hal wrote:
Looking at the RequestProcessor code there are some casts to
ActionMapping so you probably need to extend that rather than
ActionConfig. You will also be extending Martin's DownloadAction
abstract class to write a version that knows how to instantiate
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26127.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Date: 2004-09-21T15:08:03
Editor: MichaelMcGrady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsCatalogFiveMultipleButtonSolutions
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogFiveMultipleButtonSolutions
no comment
Change Log:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31212.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Date: 2004-09-21T15:33:24
Editor: MichaelMcGrady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsCatalogMultipleImageButtonsWithNoJavaScript
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogMultipleImageButtonsWithNoJavaScript
1092259842
Change Log:
Date: 2004-09-21T15:37:26
Editor: MichaelMcGrady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsCatalogFiveMultipleButtonSolutions
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogFiveMultipleButtonSolutions
no comment
Change Log:
Date: 2004-09-21T17:48:47
Editor: WendySmoak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: FrontPage
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/FrontPage
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -24,8 +24,8 @@
*
Date: 2004-09-21T17:49:25
Editor: WendySmoak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsFunStuff
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsFunStuff
no comment
New Page:
* StrutsPoetry
* StrutsGmail
Date: 2004-09-21T17:50:24
Editor: WendySmoak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsFunStuff
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsFunStuff
Attempting to get each entry on a separate line...
Change Log:
Editor: WendySmoak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ * StrutsGmail
Well... it sounded like a good idea to get all the back-and-forth about
GMail off the users list, until I got this far and realized that it would
all come HERE instead!
What's the policy on the Wiki? Keep it professional, minimal fun
Wow, I didn't expect my quick little abstract class to generate quite
this much discussion! ;-) But since my name is now in the Subject
line, I guess I should say something...
My thinking was that the class I put up for perusal was about as much
as I think we should add to Struts itself, in the
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Wendy Smoak wrote:
Editor: WendySmoak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ * StrutsGmail
Well... it sounded like a good idea to get all the back-and-forth about
GMail off the users list, until I got this far and realized that it would
all come HERE instead!
What's the policy on the Wiki?
Date: 2004-09-21T22:36:39
Editor: MichaelMcGrady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsCatalogFiveMultipleButtonSolutions
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogFiveMultipleButtonSolutions
no comment
Change Log:
43 matches
Mail list logo
